TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

If we're gonna make America healthy again, we can't allow public health to be undermined. So could you explain what steps you're gonna be taking to ensure vaccine guidance is clear, evidence based, and trustworthy? We're going to make it clear evidence based and trustworthy for the first time in history. Only one of those 19 vaccines, 92 doses, only one of those vaccines has ever been tested against an inert placebo. And what we're doing now is any new vaccine that before it's approved and licensed will have to show demonstrate safety against inert placebo. And we're going to go back and do observational studies on the existing vaccines to see if they're linked to any of these chronic disease epidemics so that people can understand the risk profile of those products and make good assessments for their own health.

We need comprehensive double-blind, long-term placebo studies to properly evaluate vaccines. Vaccines work by tricking the immune system into thinking it has encountered a disease, which raises concerns given the rising autoimmune diseases we see today. Our immune systems appear confused, attacking our own bodies. While some may question whether environmental factors like air, food, or water are to blame, it's crucial to note that vaccines are specifically designed to manipulate the immune response. Unlike past vaccination schedules, children today receive numerous vaccines—up to 72 times—far exceeding what previous generations experienced. This trend is negatively impacting the health of our children, and we must address this issue urgently.

Paul Offit said that I'm going to do everything I can to make vaccines less available and affordable, which will hurt the vaccine infrastructure in this country. I'm supposedly joining hands with Donald Trump to march into measles land. But I'm not going to take away anyone's vaccines. People should be able to get them if they want. I want to give people good science. We don't have good safety studies on almost any of the 72 vaccines mandated for children. HHS admitted there are no pre-licensing safety studies for any of them, except the COVID vaccine. We need to know the risk profiles of these products. We also don't have good data on adverse effects from the COVID vaccine, which is a crime. The CDC's surveillance system captures less than one percent of vaccine injuries. Congress and the National Academy of Sciences have repeatedly ordered the CDC to put together a better vaccine. We will do that right away.

I serve on the FDA's vaccine advisory committee because I don't have relationships with pharmaceutical companies, as that would be a conflict of interest. I actually agree with some of the things my counterpart says, such as we are too obese as a country, and we overmedicate our children. I wrote a book about this called Overkill When Modern Medicine Goes Too Far. However, I don't agree with claims that vaccines are harmful, as has been said. RFK Jr. continues to claim that vaccines cause autism, which is untrue, and he's now targeting childhood vaccines, which will only hurt children.

I believe in safe vaccines, robust science, and independent regulators. The problem with vaccines is that they have become profitable, leading to an increase in the number of vaccines given to children. In 1986, a law was passed that protects vaccine companies from being sued, removing their incentive to make vaccines safer. The four companies that make all 72 mandated vaccines have a history of wrongdoing. There is a body of science that supports my position, but I won't go into it here. The few studies that exist are flawed and written by industry and the CDC. The Institute of Medicine has criticized the CDC for not properly studying the link between autism and vaccines. Big tech companies like Facebook are censoring vaccine information. I am not anti-vaccine, but I advocate for safe vaccines.

I made it clear that my children were immunized with childhood vaccines. Public health failed to explain that COVID vaccines are different. Childhood vaccines, like for many diseases, provide immunity after one dose by giving children the disease without the deadly consequences. The COVID vaccine wasn't designed to prevent infection. Vaccine hesitancy has doubled since COVID, and we need to address these concerns. The mRNA vaccine should have been prioritized for those at high risk of severe disease, as the science and data indicated. We should have protected the elderly and those with comorbidities first. It went into young people before the elderly and nursing homes. We need to align public health actions with science and data. When we don't, we fracture trust with the American people.

We aim to reverse the chronic disease epidemic and restore the nation's health. The very people dictating our food production and healthcare are those who instigated the crisis in the first place. Many defending this system and pharmaceutical profits are heavily funded. I was asked to clean up corruption and conflict. If confirmed, I recognize the CDC's critical role for Georgia, our country, and global health. Concerns have been raised regarding my previous promotion of "junk science" and potential conflicts of interest due to book deals and vaccine-related lawsuits. People need assurance that I can be independent and science-based. I will support vaccine development and distribution if the evidence supports it. I am aware of vaccine safety data resources, but question the accessibility and integrity of the data.

I support focusing on issues like obesity and overmedicating children. Bobby Kennedy is fighting against the incentive for pharma to profit from sick children. Hospitals benefit from full beds, and chronic disease is good for the health industry's economics. I'm lobbying for SNAP bills to remove soda, highlighting a conflict where public health may not prioritize children's interests. When the data doesn't support their argument, RFK Jr. resorts to personal attacks. My Merck chair is defined by Penn, with no obligations. This is a tactic used when the science doesn't support anti-vaccine claims. The science continually proves he's wrong about vaccines.

Why did the number of vaccines triple after 1989? Are all of them necessary, or is it about profit? The US gives twice as many shots as other Western countries. Parents should educate themselves, and decide what is absolutely necessary. Do we need the chicken pox vaccine, or the hepatitis B shot on the second day of life? We can't assume public health officials always have our best interests at heart. Parents need to make educated decisions and look at the information. Space out vaccines, delay them, and clean out the toxins. Why wouldn't doctors want to learn more about preventing disease? The AAP and medical schools are financed by drug companies, and vaccines are the fastest-growing part of the pharmaceutical industry, a 13 billion dollar business. We're asking them to take a loss for the good of our children, which is a tough sell.

I raised concerns about investing NIH resources to re-examine the link between the measles vaccine and autism, given the extensive existing research and limited resources. It's impossible to prove a negative, and re-plowing already examined ground distracts from addressing unknown causes or solutions to the chronic disease crisis. We risk children dying from preventable diseases if we keep pretending this link is an issue. I agree that we need to address the rise in autism. While I believe the literature shows no connection between the MMR vaccine and autism, distrust in medicine exists post-pandemic. Providing good data is key to addressing concerns, but I'm unsure what constitutes "good data" when it already exists. The focus should be on pressing childhood health problems like diabetes and obesity, which should be the priorities of the NIH director.

I defend public health leaders and question why cuts are bad for health at HHS. Distrust stems from conflicts of interest, like Dr. Offit taking money from pharmaceutical companies while recommending drugs. He claims science is settled, yet approved vaccines have been recalled. I want focus on real issues: 38% of children having prediabetes. Measles deaths were high before vaccines, but chronic conditions are a bigger threat now. RFK Jr. isn't anti-vaccine but wants vaccine studies. I question why media covers measles over obesity and diabetes. Sixteen percent of COVID deaths were American, but the CDC didn't discuss metabolic links. I support measures like removing soda from SNAP, aiming for better health policies. Pharma profits from sick children, incentivizing chronic disease.

Avoid politics; this is about Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who promotes misinformation and conspiracy theories. Experts in the medical community express significant concerns about him potentially taking a role in health, particularly as Secretary of Health and Human Services, which oversees the CDC, FDA, and NIH. His proposals, like cutting funding for infectious diseases, are alarming, especially post-pandemic. While there are valid criticisms of the healthcare system, many of his views are not alternative but false. For instance, the myth linking vaccines to autism has been debunked through extensive studies showing no connection, and some studies even suggest unvaccinated children may have a higher autism risk. These persistent falsehoods are a major concern regarding his influence on public health.

Public health officials may not always prioritize our best interests. Parents should make their own decisions. Doctors should be open to learning about life-saving options. The pharmaceutical industry heavily influences medical education and the healthcare system. We need doctors to prioritize children's well-being over profits, even if it means taking a financial hit.

I'm preparing to shake up the Department of Health and Human Services by dismissing vaccine advisors with conflicts of interest. The medical industry has undue influence over regulators and government policy. We aim to remove conflicts of interest from committees and research partners or balance them with other stakeholders. The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices is a clear target, and their meeting was recently postponed indefinitely. Medical professionals have urged me to preserve the meeting, emphasizing the importance of vaccines in responding to public health threats. Panels advising the FDA are also being targeted. I've vowed to reassess the childhood vaccination schedule and suggested that certain vaccines, like the COVID-19 vaccines, could be taken off the market. The CDC has already withdrawn its "wild to mild seasonal" campaign for the flu vaccination.

the corruption of science, which I believe you just said. That is almost your number one goal. Right? Is try to bring integrity and credibility back to science, which has been corrupted by the people who pay for it, by federal health agencies being captured by pharmaceutical industries, by big pharma, by big food. In 02/2002, CDC did an internal study of Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia children looked at children who got the MLR vaccine on time and compared those to kids who got them later. The data from that study showed that black boys who got the vaccine on time had a two sixty percent greater chance of getting an autism diagnosis than children who waited. The chief scientist on that, Doctor. William Thompson, the senior vaccine safety science at CDC, was ordered to come into a room with four other co authors by his boss, Frank DeStefano, who’s the head of the immunization safety press, ordered to destroy that data. And then they published it without that fact. It happens all the time. We are being lied to by these agencies. And we're going to change that right now.

A prototype vaccine is being deployed to the public without actually preventing transmission, which is keeping the disease more dangerous than necessary. This is a concerning public health response. The problem is that even if we acknowledge this issue, we don't know how to change it. People tend to believe that public health authorities are doing the right thing because the alternative seems hopeless. It's difficult to discredit them without sounding like they are deliberately harming public health. People find it hard to accept that medical officials in charge of our lives may have bad motivations.

There is a discussion about how public trust in vaccination has changed since the pandemic. The speaker notes that years ago there were “five people in the world who were prepared to talk about the thorny issue of vaccination.” Post COVID, however, “half the adult population of the world are now saying, hold on, we don't trust you. You lied to us. It's not what you told us, safe and effective.” This skepticism extends to vaccines given to children, with the question, “Does this apply to all the other vaccines you're putting into my kids?” The speaker then asserts that “safety studies haven't been done,” suggesting that important research behind vaccines is incomplete or lacking. This leads to the claim that “they've created this mess for themselves.” Despite the frustration, the speaker emphasizes the moral weight of deception, stating, “it's really tough to lie. I mean, lying gets you into real trouble.”

The speaker addressed the Gavi community, stating that public trust in institutions, including medicine, has eroded. They allege that Gavi and the WHO partnered to silence dissenting views during the COVID-19 pandemic and made questionable recommendations regarding COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women. While acknowledging Gavi's success in making medicine affordable, the speaker claims Gavi neglects vaccine safety, treating it as a PR problem rather than a health concern. They cite a 2017 study that found the DTP vaccine, heavily promoted by Gavi in developing countries, may increase all-cause mortality in children. The speaker urges Gavi to re-earn public trust and justify the $8 billion in US funding by taking vaccine safety seriously and considering all available science. They state that the US will not contribute further to Gavi until it prioritizes rigorously measured overall impacts and evidence-based medicine.

The vaccine discussion is overly simplified. People distrust the government because they recommend a Hepatitis B vaccine for one-day-old infants, despite it being contracted through drug use and sexual transmission. I believe in vaccines, but not a one-size-fits-all approach. I delayed my children's Hepatitis B vaccine until they started school. On the COVID vaccine, there's a huge difference in risk between the elderly and children. The science doesn't support mandating it for healthy six-month-olds. For those over 65 or with risk factors, the vaccine was advisable. We should openly debate these issues. There isn't any clear scientific evidence about what causes autism, so shouldn't we keep an open mind about potential causes like vaccines? We need to follow the science without presuppositions.

I support discussing issues like obesity and overmedicating children. Bobby Kennedy is fighting against the incentive for pharma to profit from sick children, and he's supporting efforts to remove soda from SNAP. The problem is that organizations like Merck don't have children's best interests at heart, considering their history of criminal penalties for misleading information. When the data isn't on their side, RFK Jr. and personal injury lawyers attack the person. My Merck chair is defined by Penn, and there's no quid pro quo. The science continually proves RFK Jr. wrong about vaccines.

I made it clear that my children received childhood immunizations. The issue is we failed to communicate that COVID vaccines differ significantly from childhood vaccines, which typically provide lasting immunity after one dose. The COVID vaccine was not designed to prevent infection. Vaccine hesitancy has doubled since COVID, and we must address this. The mRNA vaccines should have prioritized individuals at high risk for severe disease, aligning with the scientific data. We should have protected the elderly and those in nursing homes first. Prioritizing young people in hospitals before the elderly was not following the science. Public health actions must align with scientific data to maintain the trust of the American people.

Why is everyone so focused on measles when so many other health issues plague our country? The media breathlessly covers five measles cases while ignoring the obesity epidemic affecting 50% of teens. Sixteen percent of COVID deaths worldwide were Americans, but our health priorities seem misdirected. The focus on measles is overshadowing other critical health concerns. Bobby Kennedy's stance isn't anti-vaccine; he simply advocates for rigorous studies on vaccines, like any other product. He, and others, are concerned with the chronic conditions responsible for 92% of deaths in the United States, and want to address the bigger picture of health policy.

What we need to do at our agency is to make sure the public believes in the things that we're saying. And the way that we do that is by telling the truth. There are many other countries that actually have a higher vaccination rates than ours where, there are no mandates, and it's because people trust their government. The Americans have lost faith in the federal government. Sixty percent of Americans say that they will not take that vaccine no matter what. And only thirteen percent of children although it's recommended for a hundred percent of children, only thirteen percent are complying. And that's after a billion dollar campaign to persuade people to take. It's the biggest campaign for a pharmaceutical product in history.

I stunned CNN viewers by exposing Dr. Paul Offit's conflicts of interest during a live debate. I questioned why public health leaders are trusted when individuals like Offit profit from pharmaceutical companies while approving their products. I highlighted the media's obsession with measles while ignoring critical health issues like obesity and diabetes affecting a significant portion of the population. I pointed out the Democrats' focus on vaccines while neglecting chronic diseases. I emphasized the need for studies on vaccines and criticized Offit for recommending vaccines that were later recalled. Pharma profits from sick children, and the media pushes narratives instead of reporting honestly. I urged viewers to protect their homes from title theft with Home Title Lock.

If your kids were young now, would you vaccinate them for measles and mumps? No, I had measles as a child, and it was common. In the early 1900s, about 10,000 Americans died from it, mostly malnourished children. Healthy kids rarely die from measles, and studies show childhood measles can lead to better health later on. Regarding Samoa, I didn't convince anyone not to vaccinate; the prime minister had already banned it after vaccine-related deaths. No one died from measles there; it was due to a bad vaccine. I still believe vaccines cause autism. A CDC study showed a 150% increased risk of autism in children who received the hepatitis B vaccine early. Many studies, which I reference in my book, link vaccines to neurological injuries. The CDC's claims against this are propaganda influenced by the pharmaceutical industry.