reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 argues that the system is a scam, noting that retirees living on $2,000–$3,000 a month is impossible because money is spent as it comes in. He cites $35 trillion in debt and $2 trillion in American taxpayers’ credit card debt, warning of a looming run on the city and questioning why Social Security money is taxed again. He reflects on personal pension and union involvement and asserts that people will need to work longer. Speaker 1 counters by outlining the history and current state of Social Security. He notes that Social Security began as a 2% tax with a promise it would never exceed 6% of income, but now it takes 12.4%, with projections (CBO or Social Security trustees) suggesting 15.8% to 17.5% in the future. He states that originally promised tax caps were not maintained and that money taken from workers’ paychecks has been spent immediately to pay promised benefits for the past thirteen years. He argues that the system benefits higher earners disproportionately and imposes a larger burden on lower-income workers, who have less left to save for retirement, and highlights disparities in life expectancy, noting that one in four African American men may die between 45 and 64 after paying into the system. He asserts that lower-income and African American workers risk receiving little or nothing in return. Speaker 0 asks for a solution. Speaker 1 proposes shifting toward a universal benefit system, bending benefits for middle and upper income earners while increasing them for lower-income earners, indexing retirement age to life expectancy, and using a more accurate inflation index. He suggests workers should have an option to invest money in something that earns a positive return and cannot be spent by Congress. Speaker 0 shares a personal perspective about his two young sons paying into Social Security and questions whether they will receive any benefits. Speaker 1 responds that younger workers will likely see some benefits, but not what has been promised. Speaker 2 adds that pensions and Social Security both provide guaranteed income, and introduces protected retirement solutions with step-ups and lock-ins that address market volatility. He credits Secure Act 1.0 and 2.0 for enabling these options and advocates adding at least one of four types of plans—401(k), 457, 403(b)—to provide Americans with retirement options and assurances about what they will get in retirement. Speaker 0 notes that young people ask why they can’t invest in their own 401(k) instead of Social Security, and Speaker 2 responds positively, stating there is a place for Social Security, pensions, and 401(k) plans, and that the right questions about savings are being asked.

The speaker states that everywhere people go, they’re asked for a Social Security card, and that proving you’re a bonafide person who can have a job involves asking for a driver’s license and a Social Security card. This is described as an anti-fraud amendment. The speaker notes that people ask why we can’t stop illegal immigrants or others from coming here, and to constituents, the number one answer given is that when they come here, they can get jobs and benefits against the law because of fraud.

Former President Biden will deliver his first major speech since leaving office tonight, reportedly focusing on Social Security under the current administration. Democrats have been claiming that there are office closures, longer wait times, and difficulty accessing benefits for seniors and people with disabilities. In response, it is claimed that President Trump is committed to protecting Social Security benefits for law-abiding, tax-paying American citizens and seniors who have paid into the program. He campaigned on this promise, protected it during his first term, and intends to continue protecting it.

We need to protect Americans' privacy and Social Security. Social Security is crucial for many Americans; for 40% it's the foundation of their retirement savings, and for 28 million, it's their sole retirement income. We must ensure its protection. No one in the Republican-controlled House and Senate will challenge us on this.

The speaker asserts that Social Security payments are essential for some people's survival, such as their mother, who relies on the deposit to feed herself. They contrast this with Donald Trump, who they claim doesn't care if his Social Security check arrives. The speaker dismisses the idea that Donald Trump understands the needs of people who depend on Social Security.

Fraudsters are stealing social security by calling in, posing as retirees, and convincing Social Security personnel to redirect payments. This happens constantly, causing legitimate recipients to miss their payments due to fraud loopholes. Doge's work will help people's benefits. Legitimate people will receive more Social Security, not less, as a result of Doge's work. Legitimate recipients of Social Security will receive more money, not less money. This claim will be proven true.

We need to protect Americans' privacy and Social Security. Social Security is crucial for many Americans; for 40% it's the foundation of their retirement savings, and for 28 million, it's their sole retirement income. We must ensure its protection. No one in the Republican-controlled House and Senate will challenge us on this.

This system is flawed, especially for retirees relying on $2,000 to $3,000 monthly. With $35 trillion in debt and $2 trillion in taxpayer credit card debt, we face a crisis. Social Security, initially a 2% tax, now takes 12.4% of income, with projections suggesting it could rise to 17.5%. The funds have been spent immediately, leaving future generations in jeopardy. Lower-income workers, particularly African Americans, often receive little in return despite years of contributions. A solution involves shifting to a universal benefit system, reducing benefits for higher earners while increasing them for lower-income individuals. Additionally, workers should have options for investments that yield returns. Young people question why they can't manage their own retirement savings instead of relying on Social Security, highlighting the need for diverse savings options.

Social Security is a program Americans pay into during their working lives, with 73 million people depending on it for financial security in retirement. It is claimed that Elon Musk and Donald Trump are breaking the "sacred promise" of Social Security. While Congress created Social Security and only Congress can cut benefits, it is alleged that Republicans are attempting to cut Social Security through the "backdoor" by making it harder to correct errors, apply for benefits, or get help when checks don't arrive. Social Security offices are reportedly closing, requiring people to travel hours for assistance, and even then, they may not receive help due to understaffing. It is asserted that these actions impose misery on people so that Elon Musk and Donald Trump can pay for tax giveaways to billionaires and corporations. The speaker urges honoring Social Security promises and requiring billionaires and corporations to pay their fair share.

The speakers claim the Social Security system is a "scam" and the U.S. is "dead broke" with $35 trillion in debt. Taxpayers also have $2 trillion in credit card debt. One speaker says they could have invested their Social Security money in the market and it would be worth $8-10 million today. Social Security originally taxed 2% of income, with a promise to never exceed 6%, but now taxes 12.4%. It may need to increase to 15.8-17.5%. For the past 13 years, incoming money has immediately paid promised benefits. Lower-income and African American workers are most likely to get nothing back due to lower life expectancies. A shift to a universal benefit system is suggested, bending down benefits for middle and upper-income earners while increasing them for lower-income earners. Workers need an option for investments with positive returns that Congress cannot spend. Solutions have been developed that address guaranteed income and market volatility. Encouragement is given to add these solutions to 401k, 457, and 403b plans. Savings in any way is good. There is a place for Social Security, pensions, and 401k plans.

We need to discuss raising the retirement age, increasing the tax on social security, and cutting benefits for people who are currently 30 years old.

We need to protect Americans' privacy and Social Security. For a significant portion of Americans, Social Security is their retirement foundation; for millions, it's their sole retirement income. With Republicans controlling the House and Senate, there's little opposition expected, but protecting Social Security is crucial. We must ensure its preservation.

Someone is allegedly going to be arrested for stealing 400,000 social security numbers and personal information from the Social Security database. This information was reportedly being sold to enable people to steal money from Social Security. The fraud is allegedly connected to illegal immigrants and voter fraud, as Social Security is the main way identification is established in the United States. Compromising the Social Security system can purportedly allow non-citizens to register to vote and obtain benefits. The speaker claims Democrats are using parts of the government to provide financial incentives for illegal immigrants to come to and remain in the United States, citing Social Security disability, Medicare, unemployment, and IRS refunds without income. FEMA funds meant for Americans in distress from natural disasters were allegedly diverted to pay for luxury hotels in New York for illegal immigrants, who are purportedly still there.

Good morning, everyone. I want to address Bernie Sanders' recent criticism regarding Social Security. He tweeted that one of us has fought to cut Social Security, referencing a 1995 statement of mine about freezing federal spending, including Social Security. However, that context is often overlooked. I was focused on preventing a government shutdown, not cutting benefits. It's surprising to revisit statements from decades ago, especially when they are taken out of context. Throughout my career, I've consistently supported Social Security. I worked with other Democrats to ensure its solvency during the Reagan years. Our obligation is to protect the youngest and oldest among us, and I have never wavered in that commitment.

Let's admit the truth. Everywhere people go, they're asked for a Social Security card. In fact, one way to prove you're a bonafide person who can have a job is to ask for a driver's license and a Social Security card. This is an anti fraud amendment. All the over where we go, people say, well, why can't you stop illegal immigrants or others from coming here? And the number one answer we give our constituents is when they come here, they can get jobs, get benefits against the law because of fraud.

The speaker asserts that no one on the Republican side in the House and Senate, who control both chambers, will speak up to challenge them. The central priority highlighted is protecting Americans’ privacy and their Social Security. The speaker emphasizes the significance of Social Security in Americans’ lives by citing two specific statistics: for 40% of all Americans, Social Security is the basis for their retirement and their retirement savings, and for 28,000,000 Americans, Social Security is the only thing that they have. Because of these the speaker argues that it is essential to ensure the protection of Social Security. The speaker notes that the time for the discussion has ended for the moment, with “The gentleman's time has expired. In the letter that” beginning a concluding fragment, suggesting a transition to the next point or document in the debate.

Social Security needs a closer look. We're finding people listed as recipients who are 50 years old, but I don't know anyone that age receiving benefits. They'd be incredibly old, practically setting a world record. It seems likely many of these individuals have passed away, or they would be very well known. There's a clear problem with the accuracy of the records.

We've identified shocking incompetence and probable fraud in the Social Security program. Government databases list millions of Social Security members at impossible ages: 4.7 million from 100-109 years old, 3.6 million from 110-119 years old, 3.47 million from 120-129, 3.9 million from 130-139, and 3.5 million from 140-149. Money is being paid out to many of these individuals because the payments continue without proper oversight. This hurts Social Security and our country. The databases even list 1.3 million people from 150-159 years old and over 130,000 people over 160 years old. We are currently investigating this issue.

I aim to do something different as a politician by phasing out Social Security completely. My objective is to uproot it and eliminate it entirely.

Republicans should not cut Medicare or Social Security to pay for Biden's spending. Biden has wasted trillions on the Green New Deal and opened our borders to migrants from prisons and mental institutions. Our border is now the worst in the world. Instead of burdening American families and seniors, we should cut spending on corrupt foreign countries, mass releases of illegal aliens, left-wing gender programs in the military, climate extremism, and waste fraud and abuse. We must save Social Security and not let the Democrats destroy it.

It is agreed that a significant amount of money is wasted, with estimates suggesting around a third of all Medicare dollars are spent without providing any useful benefit. The goal is to eliminate this waste, not to cut Medicare benefits. Medicare is a large entitlement program that needs to be maintained without bankrupting the country or denying seniors their entitlements.

The speaker explains Social Security in terms of deductions, retirement timing, and the perceived value of benefits. They state that about $25,000 is taken from each paycheck annually as a non-optional contribution for retirement. This deduction continues for roughly fifty-two years, assuming continued employment. By the time a person reaches retirement age, which the speaker notes “keeps getting pushed back,” the total contributions appear to amount to about $1,300,000 of the individual’s own money. The speaker then describes the retirement period, using an example where retirement occurs at age 65. They claim that after contributing more than a million dollars over a working lifetime, the retiree is given about $1,600 each month in Social Security benefits, which the speaker converts to roughly $19,000 per year. They extend the scenario to cover fifteen more years of life, around age 80, stating that during that entire span Social Security would have paid back roughly $288,000 of the $1,300,000 that was taken. From these numbers, the essential question the speaker raises is: where did the other million dollars go? They argue that the family does not receive it, it is not passed down, and it does not return to the retiree in any other form. Instead, the speaker asserts that the money “disappears into the system.” The claimed mechanism is that Social Security finances are “spread the taking across a lifetime so you never feel robbed,” while the benefits received are labeled as a “benefit,” or a favor, rather than a direct repayment of the contributions. The speaker emphasizes that, per person, the missing money accumulates quickly, and once the math is examined instead of the promise, it becomes difficult to view the program as primarily about helping someone retire. The presentation concludes with a caveat that this is a theory, not a fact, signaling that the statements are presented as a perspective rather than an established truth. Key figures highlighted include: $25,000 annual payroll deduction; approximately $1,300,000 contributed over about 52 years; retirement benefits of about $1,600 per month ($19,000 per year); total benefits over 15 additional years totaling around $288,000; and the assertion that roughly $1,000,000 of the contributed funds do not get returned to the individual or their family. The overarching claim is that the apparent discrepancy between contributions and received benefits calls into question the nature of Social Security as a retirement program, described here as a theory rather than a fact.

It's all a scam, with people retiring on $2-3,000, which is impossible. The country is $35 trillion in debt and broke. Taxpayers have $2 trillion in credit card debt, indicating huge trouble. There will soon be a run on the city with 50 million people demanding their money. Social Security money invested in the market for forty years could be worth $8-10 million today, but the federal government wasted it.

A lot of Americans' money has been stolen through fraud and improper payments. In one of my first hearings, we discovered criminals using social security numbers of dead people or people over 115 years old to get small business loans and steal money from federal programs. We need to work to fix these issues in our legislation, budgets, and appropriations. This is a bipartisan issue; we're addressing money being fraudulently used and stolen. The American people are being robbed blind through improper payments, fraud, and outdated systems. Some federal agencies hire third-party vendors to hold data instead of communicating within the government. We are currently $36 trillion in debt, and we can't afford to keep losing money this way.