TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In November 2022, the speaker investigated a Muslims-only mosque and migrant shelter near the Tijuana wall. They discovered individuals from Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Chechnya, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and other countries known for terrorist activities. These individuals, referred to as special interest aliens, were brought in without proper vetting. The speaker believes that the government is not conducting thorough screenings for these people. They also mention the recent influx of Haitians. Another report reveals that over 220,000 immigrants have been allowed to fly directly into the US from their home countries. The speakers express their frustration and call for criminal charges against those responsible, referring to the situation as an invasion and an act of treason against the country.

We're seeing a unified effort across President Trump's national security team and the Department of Homeland Security to ensure a safe, free, and prosperous society for Americans. Over 21 million people have crossed our borders illegally under the Biden administration, many unvetted. For example, over 4,000 people from Central Asia, affiliated with an ISIS network, crossed our borders. Hundreds were identified as known terrorists or associated with known terrorists. This information was provided to the Biden administration, yet only a fraction of those arrested were deported or remained in custody; the rest were released into our country. We're working with the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI to keep Americans safe. Our counterterrorism center is focused on vetting to identify and remove those who pose a threat. The president's designation of cartels as foreign terrorist organizations is crucial, especially with their tactics mirroring those of Islamist terrorists. Our mission is clear: to keep the American people safe.

Nobody in this country cares about watching bombs go off, but they are interested in the Mexican border, which I just visited for three days. Mexico is a cesspool of barbarism and criminality, and that's our existential threat, not China, Russia, or Iran. The cartels run everything in Mexico, and everyone knows the truth. My son was just in Mexico City, and people told him where not to go and what not to do to avoid the cartels. If you cross them, you're dead. The cartels also take care of their own, providing healthcare and other benefits. The weapons they have are serious, including RPGs and Javelin missile systems. Border patrolmen and Texas guard people have seen them just across the border. Some of these weapons may have come from Ukraine, where corruption is rampant and a lot of the aid we send ends up on the black market.

We're still inadvertently funding the Taliban through NGOs in Afghanistan and supporting Islamist rebels in Syria. Our focus should be on enhancing security at home. With Donald Trump about to take office, I'm bringing my family to the inauguration, as Sean has been nominated for Secretary of Transportation. However, I lack confidence in the FBI, DOD, and Homeland Security, especially with the open border allowing terrorists to enter. Instead of addressing this threat, they've prioritized targeting political dissidents from January 6. Additionally, there's concern within the military about flagging individuals as extremists based on superficial criteria, like tattoos.

I spoke with a Denver police officer who revealed that over 50 Al Qaeda members were arrested in Denver in the last 2 months. We discussed budget issues, lack of police cars, and the influx of migrants affecting major cities. The officer mentioned sleeper cells in Colorado from various regions, which authorities are aware of but unable to act on. The officer questioned the impact of open borders, especially for those with left-leaning views.

We're sending millions in cash to Afghanistan, even weekly shipments of $40-80 million, to folks like the Haqqani network. This is on top of the $697 million annually, funding madrasas, ISIS, Al Qaeda, and terrorist training camps. Programs like the Women's Scholarship Endowment aren't helping women; they're funding terrorism through USAID. We're essentially paying welfare to Taliban martyrs' families, while American families who lost loved ones get nothing. Some argue this prevents them from joining ISIS, but it's a lie to justify funding our enemies. The US government has been backing these groups since the late '70s, using them against other countries and even against us. It's a setup for America's collapse.

According to security analyst Tony Saruga, there has been a significant infiltration of saboteurs and terrorists over the past three years. He estimates that at least 100,000 terrorists have crossed the border, including individuals from Qatar, Lebanon, Iran, Somalia, and more. Saruga's main concern is a deeply embedded group called Hezbollah unit 9 of 10, which has been in the country for a decade. This well-funded sleeper cell could target major landmarks like the Empire State Building and Washington DC, as well as bridges and power stations. Saruga fears they could also contaminate the water supply and destroy power substations. He believes it is too late to address the border issue effectively.

We don't need to build a wall; it's not an emergency. The idea that terrorists are invading through the southern border is false. Recent reports indicate that some individuals with suspected ties to ISIS crossed the border over a year ago. Alarmingly, during a three-year period, over 100 people on the terrorist watch list were released into the U.S. under the Biden administration. Among the record number of migrants crossing the border, one was linked to an Afghan terror organization. Border patrol agents encountered at least 375 illegal migrants on the terror watch list, with 99 released into American communities, including thousands from Afghanistan, China, Iran, Syria, and Uzbekistan. The notion of a wall is not a solution to this issue.

Speaker 0: In February and March 2026, I'll be back on the road in Hull, Gateshead, Derby, and Colchester. 2026 is when they want to cross the line as fast as they can into an AI controlled humanity. We stand up now or we regret it forever. That's four dates. Speaker 0: I recorded an edition of a show for iconic.com called Legacy, relating the content of my books to today. A central concept is what I labeled in the 1990s as problem reaction solution, also known as a false flag. The idea is to create a situation—war, terrorist attack, banking collapse, or something similar—then present the version of the problem you want the public to believe to provoke outrage and urgency. Then you covertly create the problem, evoke a public reaction, and openly offer the solutions you’ve already prepared. Speaker 0: Nine-Eleven is given as a classic example: attack on New York and Washington, blame Arab terrorists, claim Osama bin Laden and the Taliban orchestrated it. The reaction is “do something,” followed by the invasions of Afghanistan and other Middle Eastern countries. In response to Bondi Beach, the point is made that representatives may not truly represent the people, and a global network I call the global cult drives dystopia through digital AI means, operating through governments, intelligence agencies, and militaries worldwide. Even leaders such as presidents or prime ministers may not serve their nations’ people but the global cult’s interests. Speaker 0: One center of this global cult’s operations is Israel, established in 1948 for that purpose. The claim is that leadership claiming to represent Jewish people operates for the global cult rather than Jewish communities, and may even sacrifice Jewish lives to advance its aims through problem reaction solution. The Gaza crisis since October 7 is described as the world’s large-scale trauma, with statements about the Israeli government’s psychopathy and a super psychopathology characterized by a complete lack of empathy and deletion of compassion. The question is whether such leaders can truly have compassion for fellow Jews if they are driven by a broader agenda. Speaker 0: Regarding October 7, the Gaza border fence is described as the world’s most defended border, with sensors so sensitive that even a small animal would be detected. Yet Hamas breached the fence in multiple places, and there were reports of a stand-down by the Israeli defense forces, allowing the cross-border assault and hostage-taking. The outcome, it’s claimed, was used by Netanyahu to justify mass slaughter and destruction in Gaza, with talk of plans to take over land and expel Palestinians. The narrative then shifts to global perception, with some Christian Zionists wavering in support due to Gaza atrocities, and Israel allegedly funding influence campaigns to restore its global image, including money to American politicians and media interests. Speaker 0: When a new attack—Bondi Beach in Australia—occurs, Netanyahu publicly notes a Jewish man disarmed one of the attackers (though a Muslim did so), before retracting. This is presented as part of a pattern: calls to crack down on anti-Semitism, equating anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel and Zionism. The claim is that the only beneficiary is those who use such events to justify censorship and control of information, while the victims, including Jewish people who died or were injured, gain nothing. Speaker 0: The discussion reiterates that mind-control techniques exist and could drive individuals to commit mass violence without full awareness, referencing mind-control concepts like Manchurian candidates. The speaker urges asking “who benefits?” and considering elements of problem reaction solution and false flags in analyzing events, recognizing that appearances of representation do not guarantee genuine representation. For readers interested in more, the speaker directs to their books and content.

I'm holding the Muslim Brotherhood's 1991 plan for the destruction of the United States, revealed as evidence in the Holy Land Foundation trial, which resulted in 108 guilty verdicts. This plan outlines a "civilization jihadist process" with the goal to sabotage western civilization from within, so that Islam may be victorious. The document lists 29 Islamic front organizations in the US created to undermine America, including ISNA, now advisors to president Obama on Middle East policy, the MSA, which has chapters on American college campuses, and NAIT, which owns the deeds to over 90% of American mosques. These organizations focus on publishing, media, and education with the specific purpose of sabotage. We have 50 known terrorist organizations currently operating within the United States.

In November 2022, the speaker visited a mosque and migrant shelter in Tijuana near the border wall. They met people from Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Chechnya, Kyrgyzstan, Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and other countries. These individuals are known as special interest aliens and are not supposed to cross the border without proper screening. The speaker believes that the government is not effectively vetting these individuals. They also criticize the administration for allowing immigrants to fly directly from their home countries to the US. Another speaker calls for criminal charges against those responsible, referring to the situation as an invasion and treason against the country.

There are concerns about the infiltration of terrorist organizations into the United States, particularly those sympathetic to the Palestinian cause. The open borders and weak policies of the Biden administration have allowed for potential threats to enter the country. The Mexican cartels, responsible for killing Americans with fentanyl, could also collaborate with terrorists. It is unknown how many sleeper cells or terrorists are present in the US, but the close alliance with Israel suggests that the conflict between Israel and Hamas could spread to American streets. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies are worried, but their ability to address these threats is hindered by distractions and resource limitations. The US is seen as a likely target due to its support for Israel.

I teamed up with Sarah Adams and Scott Bannon to interview Ahmad Massoud, leader of the Northern Alliance resisting the Taliban. After the Taliban took control, they began issuing legitimate passports to terrorists, including Hamza bin Laden, who is marrying into various terrorist networks. These groups now share a common goal of attacking the Western world. They're funneling terrorists through South America into the U.S., and there's no way to track how many have entered. I believe this situation is by design, with the government allowing a porous border for political gain, prioritizing votes over safety. They may not fully grasp the consequences of their actions, but unrest seems to be a tactic they’ve used before.

The domestic war on terror is here. It's coming after half of the country. The helicopters have left Afghanistan, and now they've landed here at home. And the left is hunting the right, sticking them in Guantanamo Bay for American citizens, leaving them there to rot. We are dealing with an insurgency in The United States. Terrorism for white supremacy is the most lethal threat to homeland. I've been told that I'm a white nationalist. Me. FBI, come on. They've begun to fight a new enemy in a new war in terror. Not Al Qaeda, but white supremacy. False flags have happened in this country. One of which may have been January 6.

The borders are open and countries like Venezuela, Iran, Russia, and China are collaborating, including drug trafficking. There are concerns about sleeper cells infiltrating the US and using various pressure points to exert influence. The Securities Exchange Commission is turning a blind eye to hold them accountable due to financial gains. This situation poses a significant threat to American foreign policy.

In November 2022, the speaker investigated a Muslims-only mosque and migrant shelter near the Tijuana wall. They discovered individuals from Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Chechnya, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and other countries known for terrorist activities. These individuals, referred to as special interest aliens, were brought in without proper vetting. The speaker expresses concern about the lack of screening and mentions the recent announcement of Haitians being brought in. Another report reveals that over 220,000 immigrants were allowed to fly directly from their home countries to the US. The speakers call for action, suggesting that criminal charges should be brought against those responsible for this invasion. They view it as treason and a well-planned act against the country.

Speaker: The way ISIS got there, as I remember from covering the Syrian war, includes reporting from the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOAR), which is based in the UK. SOAR reported that anti-ISIS Western coalition helicopters were airlifting foreign ISIS fighters—not the Syrian ISIS fighters—but out of Deir al-Zor in Syria. And, of course, Western media didn’t report this at all. It was a shock because at the time, nobody could understand where they were taking them or whether they were shuttle them back into the Iraqi theater. Two different sources told me that the US coalition was airlifting foreign ISIS fighters into Afghanistan, which at the time I didn’t understand at all. But in light of what’s happened, the US needed to leave behind a dirty fighting force that would blow up mosques, blow up schools, infrastructure to continue chaos once US forces left to impede the development of pipelines and roadways that would allow China, Russia, Iran, and Pakistan to connect with Afghanistan, to keep the country chaos. Basically, the story of ISIS itself—when we talk about it being potentially a US construct—ISIS K is really absolutely a US CIA specific construct.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the presence and influence of the Taliban within government and international circles, and the U.S. approach to engagement. Speaker 1 suggests that while there may not be overt Taliban infiltration as a formal party, there are lobbyists, supporters, and Taliban in neckties and suits in Washington, pointing to the speech of the U.S. special envoy to Afghanistan, Thomas West, as evidence of whitewashing the Taliban. Speaker 0 counters that the U.S. is in regular, productive dialogue with the Taliban, and believes the Taliban are sincere but frustrated. He notes that no sanctions have been passed against the Taliban since last August, that four Americans have returned, but several remain in Taliban custody. He also highlights that the U.S. has backed the shipment of hundreds of millions of dollars in cash into the country since August, and claims it is actually over $1,000,000,000. Speaker 0 states that the U.S. has cooperated with the Taliban on certain discrete issues, including closing roads and managing crowds to prevent terrorist disruption, and that he has had a series of engagements with senior Taliban leaders. When asked about returning to Afghanistan to meet with the Taliban, he says, “The sooner, the better,” noting that the Taliban want sanctions relief, development aid, and a big seat at the table. He mentions an announced plan to pump in another $308,000,000, and describes mechanisms that are getting hundreds of millions of dollars in cash directly into the banking system. The Taliban purportedly want to seat their permanent representative in New York. ISIS-K is described as a common enemy, with the Taliban maintaining a vigorous and robust effort against it. He asserts that, despite concerns, they are building productive relationships and an honest dialogue with Taliban members, while acknowledging the priority of countering ISIS-K. He references the Doha agreement breach by the Taliban in sheltering Ayman al-Zawahiri in downtown Kabul, which he characterizes as unacceptable and a major breach, and states that even after this event, the U.S. is prepared to engage pragmatically with the Taliban regarding terrorism concerns. Speaker 1 adds that the UN and World Bank are developing a humanitarian exchange facility to move more Afghans into the system, noting that many banknotes have circulated for over ten years and are not accepted by shops or the central bank. He mentions a private-sector arrangement in Europe facilitating the shipment of hundreds of millions in cash into private banks in Afghanistan, with money going to the Afghanistan International Bank (AIB), which allegedly lacks authority to convert dollars to Afghanis and to auction them, and then passes funds to the Taliban-controlled Central Bank of Afghanistan. He asks who is in charge of the Central Bank, identifying Nur Ahmad Ora as the head, described as sanctioned by the U.S. for financing IED attacks that killed American soldiers. He concludes that diplomacy with the Taliban is essential to achieve objectives and asks whether there are Taliban in elections, asserting that they hold official offices and are present, urging the listener to review their statements to determine if they are Taliban sympathizers or whitewashing the Taliban. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 remarking, “Man, that's scary.”

In November 2022, I visited a mosque and shelter in Tijuana with people from various countries, including those linked to terrorist groups. Concerns were raised about lack of proper screening for these individuals. Calls were made to cut off funding and take legal action against those responsible for allowing this invasion. The administration permitted over 220,000 immigrants to fly directly to the U.S. This is seen as a coordinated invasion that warrants criminal charges for those involved.

If I were the governor here, I would be afraid. We see trucks and groups of people crossing the border, and the Border Patrol is watching. There are a lot of people coming in, and this is just the first wave. There are more coming. It's not good that Joe Biden is allowing this. I want Trump back in office because he would deport these people. Islam is terrible for the world, like a new virus. We have a lot of terrorists in America, but I don't have the exact numbers.