reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript discusses several intertwined points about the FDA's funding, information sources, and a personal health journey. It states that the FDA gets 47% of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry, and that this information was released only after a rumor claimed 50% of their funding came from big pharma. The speaker notes, “the people that you’re supposed to be making rules and regulations for are the same people that are paying you money,” describing this as a conflict of interest and urging readers to consider the implication of funding influencing regulatory decisions. The speaker then shifts to their personal experience with health issues and the challenge of finding valid information that isn’t paid for by big pharma. They share a statistic attributed to women with similar issues: “85 to ninety percent of the women who experience the same issues that I experience notice changes in their symptoms or alleviation completely from their symptoms simply by changing their diet, namely going gluten free.” Although the speaker says they personally are not inclined to adopt gluten-free changes, they are cutting out refined carbs and sugars from their diet and report progress: “I've been on this diet for two days now, and I already feel a ton different.” This personal anecdote is presented in the context of comparing diet-driven symptom changes to pharmaceutical influence. The speaker mentions ongoing changes to their living space and routines as part of their broader stance. They say, “we're putting up our squat rack again in our home gym,” signaling a strengthening or lifestyle shift. They also report, “we did get some egg laying birds,” suggesting new household activities. Throughout, there is a reiterated sentiment directed at big pharma: “basically saying a big to big pharma,” underscoring their stance against pharmaceutical influence. Finally, the speaker emphasizes the surprising nature of the 47% funding figure and reiterates, “I still can't believe it's 47% of their funding, and they think that's okay.” They invite audience engagement, closing with, “as always, I look forward to hearing your thoughts about all of this down below.”

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker points out that the media is controlled by a few corporations and suggests that there should be regulation by the FTC. They mention that network TVs rarely report anything negative about the nuclear industry, such as the case of Westinghouse being pursued for fraud.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Particularly the new evening news shows are just bracketed one after the other by pharmaceutical ads. Brought to you by Pfizer. Making a difference. Brought to you by Pfizer. CNN tonight. Brought to you by Pfizer. Anderson Cooper three sixty brought to you by Pfizer. And so, you know, you look at somebody like Anderson Cooper, I think Anderson Cooper makes about $20,000,000, you know, give or take. If you say he's got a $20,000,000 salary and 75% of that or 80% of that is coming from the pharmaceutical companies, that's who his real boss is.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
A network president revealed that allowing certain voices on air could lead to the host's firing due to advertiser pressures, particularly from pharmaceutical companies. During non-election years, up to 70% of news revenue can come from pharma ads, which serve as a public relations tactic rather than simply promoting drugs. This funding influences the media, making it reluctant to investigate pharmaceutical practices, even when there are serious concerns about vaccine safety and corporate misconduct. The media often dismisses legitimate questions as anti-science, silencing discussions about vaccine injuries. There's a growing need to reconsider trust in the pharmaceutical industry, especially with the increasing government funding for drugs like Ozempic.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker had a long-standing, if politically opposed, friendship with the founder of Fox News, stemming from time spent together in Africa. Despite their disagreements, the founder was loyal and ensured the speaker, an environmentalist, appeared on Fox News programs with hosts like Sean Hannity. In 2014, the speaker presented the founder with a documentary about mercury in vaccines, which resonated with him due to a personal connection. However, the founder said he couldn't allow the speaker to discuss it on air because doing so would lead to repercussions from Rupert Murdoch and potential firings, as pharmaceutical companies accounted for 75% of the evening news division's advertising revenue. The founder stated that 17 out of 22 ads on a typical evening news show were pharmaceutical ads, a primary revenue source vital for the financially struggling networks.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm an investigative reporter who initially trusted the medical establishment, but I've uncovered conflicts of interest and financial incentives that corrupt health research. The pharmaceutical industry legally launders taxpayer money through universities to produce unchallenged, biased studies. For example, a researcher who found a chemical feminizing frogs faced immense pressure to suppress his findings. Scientific journals are also compromised; former editors admit they couldn't stop industry-tainted studies. Drug companies ghostwrite articles for doctors to promote their products. They also influence medical schools, doctor education, media, and federal agencies, prioritizing profit over public health. This has led to a rise in chronic diseases, especially among children, that the medical establishment largely ignores. There's pressure to normalize these outcomes rather than address the root causes, as that is more profitable. Informed consent is also threatened, with the FDA loosening requirements for disclosing study risks.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker had a close but politically opposed relationship with the founder of Fox News, stemming from a shared experience in Africa. Despite their differences, the founder, whom the speaker describes as witty, engaging, paranoid, and brilliant, would have Fox News hosts put the speaker on air to discuss environmental issues. In 2014, the speaker presented the founder with a documentary about mercury in vaccines, which the founder was convinced by, especially because he believed a family member had been affected. However, he couldn't allow the speaker to discuss it on air because pharmaceutical companies provided 75% of the evening news division's advertising revenue. The founder stated that 17 out of 22 ads on a typical evening news show were pharmaceutical ads, which was the principal source of revenue for many television networks.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Pharmaceutical companies buy TV ads not to influence people to ask for specific drugs, but to manipulate the news industry. The ads are a tactic to buy off the news and prevent them from investigating the pharmaceutical industry. The news acts as a referee, labeling anyone who questions vaccine safety as anti-science, while the two largest vaccine makers have been involved in criminal activities. People who have experienced vaccine injuries are silenced and labeled as anti-science. The media is funded by pharmaceutical companies at all levels, creating a dark reality. The speaker believes it is empowering to recognize this and calls for a shift away from trusting pharmaceutical companies, especially considering the massive government funding they receive.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Government regulators are influenced by big pharma, with FDA employees receiving royalties from approved vaccines and drugs. FDA's budget heavily relies on pharmaceutical industries, leading to agency capture. For instance, NIH owns half of the Moderna vaccine, with high-level deputies under Fauci receiving $150,000 annually from it indefinitely. This conflict of interest is not widely discussed in mainstream media, as speaking out can lead to censorship.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
In the United States, the standard model of journalism, which relies on corporate advertising, imposes severe restraints on media outlets. Journalists are limited in what they can say to avoid offending corporate advertisers. This restricts the opinions, perspectives, and reporting that can be aired. It is ironic that journalists, who should value their freedom to speak, are shocked when someone like Elon Musk tells corporations to go fuck themselves for trying to control political content. The problem lies with journalists who serve establishment power instead of challenging it. The corporatization of media has imported a culture of avoiding controversy and pleasing powerful people, leading to a lack of courage among journalists.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a lot of corruption in politics due to money, bribes, and backdoor deals. One major mistake was allowing drug companies to advertise on television, which only two countries, the United States and New Zealand, permit. These commercials often make exaggerated claims and list potential side effects very quickly. It's concerning how they can make something seem great one moment and then mention serious side effects like suicidal thoughts and rectal bleeding. Personally, I haven't taken many medications, but when I tried SSRIs, I found the last 20 seconds of the commercial more impactful than the rest, and I didn't experience any benefits from them.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript claims that around the same time John B. Rockefeller seized US media, he also “hijacked US medicine.” It says that once it was discovered drugs could be produced from petroleum, Rockefeller ordered propagandists to “invert reality” so that medicines used for thousands of years were classified as alternative, while new petroleum-based, highly addictive, and patentable drugs were declared the gold standard. It further claims that after buying a German pharmaceutical company that manufactured chemicals of war for Adolf Hitler, Rockefeller leveraged political influence by pressing Congress to declare natural healing modalities unscientific “quackery.” The transcript says Rockefeller took control of the American Medical Association, then offered massive grants to top medical schools with a mandate that only his approved curriculum be taught. It states that references to the healing powers of herbs, plants, and diet were erased from most medical textbooks, and that doctors and professors who objected to Rockefeller’s plan were crucified by the media, removed from the AMA, and stripped of their license to teach and practice medicine. It adds that those who spoke out were arrested and jailed. When evidence emerged that petroleum-based medicines were causing cancer, the transcript says Rockefeller founded the American Cancer Society through which he suppressed that information. It states that John D. Rockefeller is credited as the founder of the pharmaceutical industry and attributes the idea of ongoing medical error as the third leading cause of death in America to that history, while specifying “This is not an indictment against doctors.” Finally, the transcript argues that doctors are under the “stranglehold” of the single largest lobbying power in Washington and claims that every year the pharmaceutical industry spends at least twice the amount as big oil to influence laws, policies, and public perception. It concludes that “No industry has more power over our lives than big pharma.”

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The medical industry is based on a lie because John D. Rockefeller bought major universities and media companies early on. He created his own curriculum for medicine based on pharmacology, which was rooted in the extraction of substances from oil. These medicines extracted from oil were found to cause cancer. Rockefeller used his power and media influence to debunk all forms of natural therapy. Doctors who spoke against him were discredited, their lives were destroyed, and some were assassinated. If you think you need pills, you'll be controlled by pharmaceutical companies.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
In the United States, the standard model of journalism, which relies on corporate advertising, imposes severe restraints on media outlets. This limits the hiring of certain journalists and restricts the opinions, perspectives, and reporting that can be aired. Journalists should value their freedom to speak, but many are afraid to challenge corporate advertisers. The recent controversy involving Elon Musk telling corporations to "go fuck yourself" for trying to control political content highlights the lack of journalists willing to stand up to such limitations. The corporatization of media has led to a culture of avoiding controversy and pleasing powerful people, resulting in a lack of courage among journalists.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The media is controlled by a few corporations like Disney, Fox, Westinghouse, and GE. They can say whatever they want and silence those who disagree. They rarely talk about the negative aspects of the nuclear industry, like Westinghouse being sued for fraud or GE operating nuclear bomb plants. These corporations receive billions in subsidies from the government and use tax money to support congressmen. They also dump toxic waste and GE made the bullets that shot JFK. When you buy products sponsored on this show, you contribute to this chain. McDonald's was ignored because they made jokes about O.J. Simpson. Lord Michael and Barry went to the same high school.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
In the United States, the standard model of journalism, which relies on corporate advertising, imposes severe restraints on media outlets. This restricts the hiring of certain journalists and limits the opinions, perspectives, and reporting that can be aired. Journalists should value their freedom to speak, but many are afraid to challenge corporate advertisers. The recent controversy involving Elon Musk telling corporations to "go fuck yourself" for trying to control political content highlights the lack of journalists willing to stand up to such limitations. The corporatization of media has led to a culture of avoiding controversy and pleasing powerful people, resulting in a lack of courage and integrity among journalists.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Media is controlled by a few corporations, regulated by the FCC. Disney, Fox, and Westinghouse are involved. Westinghouse faced a fraud lawsuit. There were unreported crimes and boycotts for operating nuclear plants.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The media in our country is heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical industry, with 75% of advertising revenues on mainstream media coming from pharma. The evening news, where pharmaceuticals are advertised, has an even higher ratio. Anderson Cooper, with a $12,000,000 annual salary, receives $10,000,000 from Pfizer. His allegiance lies with Pfizer, not CNN. They openly acknowledge this partnership, as seen in the "brought to you by Pfizer" tagline. Consequently, Cooper is unlikely to provide unbiased information about Pfizer's products. Instead, he aims to sell them and instill fear by suggesting that not using them could be fatal.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Home media is controlled by a few corporations due to FCC deregulation. These corporations own networks like CVS and CNBC, allowing them to control narratives and suppress dissenting opinions. PCBs come from electric power plants. GE was boycotted for operating nuclear bomb plants. A footnote protects you from folks who doubt what you say.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The medical industry is based on a lie. John D. Rockefeller bought major universities and media companies, creating his own medical curriculum based on pharmacology, which extracts substances from oil. These medicines were found to cause cancer. Rockefeller used his power to debunk natural therapies, discredit doctors who spoke against him, destroy their lives, and even assassinate some. If you think you need pills, pharmaceutical companies will control you.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker reflects on being fired and acknowledges that there were many factors at play. They mention that being a high-rated host doesn't guarantee job security and that there are complex dynamics within big companies. They express that they weren't shocked by the firing and understood that they couldn't defy everyone and expect to keep their job. The speaker also discusses the influence of advertisers on news coverage, particularly in the pharmaceutical industry. They state that while they personally never faced pressure to shape their views, they were always clear that they would speak their truth. The speaker acknowledges that their positions on certain issues were unpopular within their company but appreciates that they were allowed to express them. They also discuss the lack of communication and explanation from the company regarding their firing. The second speaker finds it strange that a top performer would be fired without any feedback and believes it to be self-destructive from a business standpoint. The first speaker agrees and emphasizes the importance of explaining disagreements and delivering uncomfortable news. They mention that they weren't too upset about being fired as they were aware of the harsh realities of the industry.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker reflects on being fired from their show and acknowledges that there were many factors at play. They mention having unpopular opinions and speculate that this may have influenced the decision. They also discuss how being a top-rated host doesn't guarantee job security and that there are complex dynamics within big companies. The speaker admits to not being shocked by the firing and expresses no hard feelings. They mention the influence of advertisers on news coverage, particularly in the pharmaceutical industry. The speaker states that they were never explicitly told what to say, but they were always clear that they would speak their mind. They believe their willingness to express unpopular views may have contributed to their dismissal. The speaker also comments on the lack of communication and explanation from the company regarding their firing. They conclude by acknowledging the harsh realities of the industry and accepting the consequences.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker points out that major media outlets like CNBC, Fox, and CNN are owned by Vanguard and BlackRock, who are also the top shareholders of Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, and Moderna. They mention that Vanguard and BlackRock are also the top shareholders of flight companies and junk food manufacturers. The speaker suggests that this control extends to social media platforms like Meta, Snapchat, Twitter, and Google, which they claim are pushing the same narrative as the media. They emphasize that these companies are profit-driven.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1999, claims of a connection between autism and vaccines were met with media backlash. It's alleged that pharmaceutical companies, a major revenue source for media companies, buy protection. The U.S. is purportedly one of two countries allowing this. A Supreme Court case gave pharmaceutical advertising First Amendment protection, treating it as political speech. Direct-to-consumer advertising exploded after changes in the 90s. Roger Ailes, despite political differences, allowed the speaker to discuss the environment on Fox News. However, Ailes refused to air a documentary about mercury in vaccines, fearing repercussions from Rupert Murdoch. Pharma ads allegedly constitute 75% of evening news revenue, with 17 out of 22 ads being pharmaceutical. This revenue is purportedly keeping many television networks afloat amidst financial struggles.

This Past Weekend

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. | This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von #370
Guests: Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
reSee.it Podcast Summary
On this episode, Theo Von welcomes Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whose book The Real Anthony Fauci is a central topic of discussion. Kennedy describes his research process, including a 300‑plus‑member email list of actors, MDs, and scientists that lets him see new studies in real time and hear critical analyses of them. He argues that agency capture taints public health and environmental regulators, with the FDA funded largely by pharmaceutical companies and fast‑track approvals turning regulators into partners of industry. He contends the COVID response prioritized profits over lives, noting that early treatment was minimized and hospitalizations and ventilator use followed Fauci’s regimens. He cites hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin as effective in early treatment, says NIH studies in 2005 and later showed HCQ's potential, and accuses Gates and others of funding studies designed to discredit these drugs by using hospitalized patients and overdosing. He claims there were coercive incentives for hospitals to code deaths as COVID and to use Remdesivir, driving up counts and profits. Kennedy criticizes social and traditional media for pharma‑driven censorship, recounting his experience with Fox News where advertising revenue from pharma influenced editorial choices. He links Big Tech to the pharmaceutical industry, claiming Google and Facebook manage vaccine content and data to protect profits. He asserts direct‑to‑consumer advertising fueled this power and notes the lack of liability for vaccine manufacturers under the EUA framework, arguing that the Pfizer trial’s six‑month data showed vaccines did not clearly prevent death or transmission and appeared to increase all‑cause mortality. The discussion covers Event 201, gain‑of‑function research funded through USAID and DARPA, and the Wuhan lab network. Kennedy connects these to broader concerns about surveillance, vaccine passports, programmable money, and the erosion of civil liberties, urging three daily acts of civil disobedience to reclaim rights. He highlights autism links with vaccines in some studies and defends publishing with extensive references. The interview closes with praise for the book, a call to resist, and thanks to Kennedy for joining.
View Full Interactive Feed