reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 1 administered COVID-19 vaccinations but is unsure of the number. Speaker 0 suggests COVID is a hoax for depopulation, causing deaths and disabilities worldwide. Speaker 1 took responsibility to protect their company. Speaker 0 finds the revelations interesting.

The speaker claims the vaccine saved hundreds of thousands of lives but acknowledges side effects and breakthrough infections. The speaker argues that the vaccine was claimed to stop transmission and infection, but it did not. An argument ensues with someone who disagrees, with accusations of being crazy and shutting up. The speaker denies using ad hominem attacks.

The discussion revolves around the safety and efficacy of COVID vaccines. Speaker 0 believes vaccines have done more good than harm, citing personal experiences. Speaker 1 argues that vaccines did not reduce severity, hospitalization, or death, as the virus became milder and early treatment improved outcomes. They claim misclassification bias in reporting vaccine-related deaths and point to high post-vaccine mortality rates. Calls are made to remove vaccines due to safety concerns.

Speaker 1 expresses skepticism about the COVID-19 vaccine due to lack of clarity and the speed at which it was developed. Speaker 2 counters by explaining that 20 years of scientific research contributed to its creation. Speaker 0, who is vaccinated, argues that if more people refuse the vaccine, the virus will continue to spread. Speaker 1 questions the accuracy of COVID-19 death numbers and suggests ulterior motives behind vaccine incentives. Speaker 0 emphasizes the importance of protecting health and the city. Speaker 1 accuses the pandemic of being fear-driven.

Speaker 0 criticizes Dr. Peter Hotez, a pediatrician known for his views on COVID. They claim that Hotez's statements are disconnected from reality and discredit American medicine. They accuse him of spreading misinformation and politicizing medicine. Speaker 1 agrees, stating that anti-science beliefs are harmful and that various government agencies should address this issue. Speaker 0 concludes by urging Baylor, the organization associated with Hotez, to distance themselves from him. They argue that Hotez's opponents should be targeted by the justice department.

The speaker argues that looking up “FDA licensed vaccines” and reviewing “6.1” in vaccine inserts on the FDA website shows that placebo trials “never” occurred, including for childhood vaccines. The speaker claims that these placebo trial details are contained in insert text that was “wrapped around a vaccine” but allegedly not shown to people due to lack of “informed consent,” and that experts may cite studies that the speaker says did not exist. The speaker further alleges that Tony Fauci lied about “six foot distancing,” and that “everyone at the CDC and the regulatory agencies” lied. The speaker also claims that Robert Kennedy Jr. stated that COVID vaccine efficacy claims about stopping transmission were lied about, referencing Rachel Maddow’s claim that if you take the vaccine “it stops with you,” and the speaker asserts “the virus stops with you bull crap” and “it does. And you heard that here,” followed by a claim that it “does not” based on what “we know.” The speaker says that FDA “has already admitted” these points and emphasizes a call to “start asking people to show their work” and to “see the evidence,” saying “Do not trust experts any longer” because “we’ve been lied to long enough.” The speaker expresses hope that a documentary will not be the last made and claims they do interviews by giving their opinions directly and not worrying about being edited “to make me look crazy,” arguing that audiences will decide for themselves. The speaker then discusses the “vaxxed versus unvaxxed” study, saying they worked to build a relationship with someone who wanted to “prove me wrong.” The speaker claims they took a risk and promised to trust whatever the study shows if it is published, and asserts that the study results will show “how bad it is when you do this study the right way.” The speaker claims the CDC has “done this study a thousand times” trying to prove vaccinated people are healthier and that it “can’t” be done, and that doing it “the right way” will reveal worse outcomes. Finally, the speaker frames the “inconvenient” study as inconvenient for panels, for the pharmaceutical industry that allegedly owns television stations, and for CDC and HHS leadership, concluding that they “aren’t going to take it anymore” and claiming “evidence like they have never, ever had before.”

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 engage in a discussion about allegations surrounding vaccines. Speaker 0 asserts that, up until about a year and a half ago, he would not have endorsed such views, but now, after considering what is happening, he feels compelled to admit that colleagues and friends who have claimed this is genocide may be right. He states, “There is no other agenda. There is no other explanation,” insisting that there can be no alternative interpretation for current events. He contends that these vaccines, described as gene-based vaccines, are not needed because we are not dealing with a killer virus that is destroying mankind, and that anyone who says otherwise is lying to one’s face. He further claims that the so-called vaccines could never have protected against infection because the antibodies are not present when they are needed. He adds that resistance and immunity to these viruses is not antibody-based but is based on T cells that are present in every human being. He then makes a grave assertion about the vaccines, describing them as “the most terrible instruments that have ever been introduced into the human body to destroy humans,” asserting that they affect “the mind, going to the heart, going to the organs and to the entire body,” and concluding that these vaccines are going to destroy mankind. Speaker 1 frames the discussion by highlighting that Michael Yiddin described the situation as genocide and criminal, and asks Speaker 0 to explain, noting that Speaker 0 had stated the same views. The exchange centers on whether the situation constitutes genocide and criminal acts, with Speaker 0 acknowledging the possibility but using strong language to emphasize his conclusions about the vaccines’ necessity, mechanism of immunity, and potential harm. Overall, the dialogue presents a trajectory from initial reluctance to endorsement of genocide claims, driven by claims that gene-based vaccines are unnecessary, not protective against infection due to lack of antibodies, rely on T-cell-based immunity, and may cause widespread harm to the mind, heart, and other organs, culminating in the assertion that such vaccines could destroy mankind.

Speaker 0 asserts that the design of the molecular structures in vaccines and injections has no purpose other than to injure and kill. Drawing on 30 years of experience in rational drug design, they say every component in a vial is chosen by someone with specific objectives (e.g., how quickly absorbed, how long it lasts, where it distributes in the body) and that these components are not random or natural products. They declare the ingredients to be toxic by design and intentionally harmful. This, they claim, fits with what they call “the lie” about the pandemic, arguing there wasn’t a real pandemic. According to Speaker 0, the pandemic’s purpose was to damage the economy, train people to comply under a mock emergency, and compel people to get vaccinated. They warn that if people do nothing, speak up less, and simply follow directives, they will lose their freedom and then their lives. They allege that a self-appointed group of very rich people desires a much smaller global population than 8,000,000,000 people, and they claim to be able to deduce the script behind these events. The speaker urges listeners to start talking to anyone and everyone relentlessly, insisting that this situation is not going away. They warn that without protest and refusal, people will first lose their freedom and then their lives.

The speaker claims that the COVID vaccine is toxic and could have caused the deaths of 17 million people worldwide. They suggest that there is a temporary increase in all-cause mortality following vaccine rollouts, which is consistent across different countries. Another speaker points out that normally, deaths decrease in the summer, but during the vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality, even in the Southern Hemisphere where it should be low. They mention that this pattern is seen during booster rollouts as well. This phenomenon is described as unprecedented.

The speaker claims that searching the FDA website for “FDA licensed vaccines” and checking section 6.1 on vaccine insert documents will show that placebo trials “never did” occur, including for childhood vaccines. They argue that placebo trial details are included in insert materials for vaccines where the public “never got to see” certain information due to lack of informed consent, and they say experts would claim those studies were done because they rely on what the insert language indicates or what they assert based on expert testimony. The speaker further asserts that Tony Fauci lied about six-foot distancing and that “Everyone at the CDC and the regulatory agencies” lied about COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, specifically claiming the vaccine “would stop transmission” was false and that if vaccinated people contract and transmit the virus, “the virus stops with you” and they claim it “does not” stop with you. They say the FDA has “already admitted it,” and they call for people to “start asking people to show their work,” to seek evidence, and to “not trust experts any longer,” stating they have been lied to “long enough.” They express that they hope a documentary is not the last one and say they take interviews without concern about edits that could make them look “crazy,” because they believe viewers will agree. The speaker then discusses the “vaxxed versus unvaxxed study,” saying they have been addressing it “forever” and that they took a risk by agreeing to trust the study’s results if the other party published them. They say the CDC has “done this study a thousand times” in ways meant to prove vaccinators are healthier and “they can’t do it,” and they claim that results become “bad” when the study is done “the right way.” They describe an “inconvenient study” that they say is inconvenient for panelists, for the pharmaceutical industry that they say owns television stations, and for CDC leadership and HHS officials they claim were involved in “covering up the real science.” They conclude that people will “not take it anymore” and that they now have evidence “like they have never, ever had before.”

Speaker 0 argues that billions of people were injected with an experimental vaccine, stating “it wasn't a bloody just no. It wasn't.” He rejects the notion of it being definitive or perfect, emphasizing that “it wasn’t” in terms of being a flawless solution. Speaker 1 counters, asserting “It was no one isn’t,” suggesting confusion or contradiction in the prior claim and challenging the certainty of the statement. He adds that there is a lack of a 100% success rate and questions the ultimate aim, asking what the core purpose is when it comes to giving your body a training of the immune system and technology. Speaker 0 reinforces the complexity, noting that there were “different types” to contend with and that the fact that they weren’t the same technology matters. He agrees there are various types of vaccines or approaches, indicating there is diversity in the technology or formulations used. Speaker 1 concedes the existence of different types and technologies, acknowledging that “there are different types of” vaccines, and that “There are different technologies.” He identifies mRNA as a type of vaccine but Speaker 0 interrupts, insisting “No. It was” and continuing his line of reasoning about the distinctions between the technologies and their evolution. Speaker 1 acknowledges change, saying “like this, and now it's like this,” recognizing a progression or shift in the approach. Speaker 0 rejects the suggestion that the transition is simple or uniform, insisting “No. No. No. It was like this, and now it's like this.” He asserts that the mRNA technology represented a radical, qualitative leap forward in technology, a claim about the significance of the development. Speaker 0 contends that naming the technology as mRNA can be acceptable only in a limited sense; he says “You can call it if if you want to, but it bears very little resemblance to anything that went before that.” The rationale for the term mRNA is tied to branding: “The reason it was called a scene was because was a brand name that had a track record of safety, and shoehorning it in that was one of the ways to make sure that people weren't terrified of the technology.”

Speaker 0 questions the idea that Doctor Fauci is involved in a plot to kill millions, seeking clarity on the claim. Speaker 1 says they are reasonable and that Fauci is not an innocent bystander; he is aware of what he’s doing, but the extent of involvement is not known to them. Speaker 2 cites the Center for Countering Digital Hate, stating Dirashad Bhattar is one of the top spreaders of COVID disinformation, once with more than a million followers. Bhattar allegedly claimed “More people are dying from the COVID vaccine than from COVID,” and that “the Red Cross won’t accept blood from people who have had the COVID nineteen vaccine.” He posted that “most who took COVID vaccines will be dead by 2025,” and promoted the overarching conspiracy that COVID was a planned operation as part of a secret global plot to depopulate the earth. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 2 believes the pandemic was planned; Speaker 2 confirms there is a suspicion of a plan to reduce the population, though Speaker 1 says they have no idea. Speaker 2 criticizes Bhattar, saying it would be laughable if it weren’t so dangerous and that Qatar (Qatar’s commentary) compares COVID and the vaccine to World War II and Doctor Anthony Fauci to Adolf Hitler. Speaker 1 pushes back by asking to what extent Fauci would be equated with Hitler. Speaker 3 asserts that lies cost lives in a pandemic, and that encouraging people not to vaccinate will cause people to lose their lives. Speaker 2 describes Qatar as encouraging distrust of life-saving vaccines and using false, twisted information and unproven conspiracies to do so. Speaker 0 asks if the COVID vaccine works. Speaker 1 states the vaccine is very effective at what it was designed for, but “it’s not preventing death. Certainly not.” Speaker 2 contradicts, claiming that Bhattar believes life-saving vaccines are more dangerous than the virus itself, and Speaker 1 asks why the vaccine would cause more deaths than the problem itself, noting 6,340,000,000 doses administered. Speaker 0 requests the completion of a sentence about what each vaccine is geared up for, but Speaker 1 says he’s not a vaccine developer and mentions “Scientific corruption.” Speaker 2 notes Qatar has been removed from Facebook and Instagram due to disinformation but remains on Twitter, Telegram, and his own site, filled with falsehoods. Speaker 0 recalls a September 5 retweet of a doctored AstraZeneca packaging photo suggesting the vaccine was made in 2018; Speaker 1 says the photo was perhaps fake, and questions why Speaker 0 would challenge the agencies that have caused deaths. Speaker 0 argues it’s reasonable to question agencies, noting Speaker 1 had 1,200,000 followers who received false information; Speaker 1 admits if a tweet with a doctor’s photo was sent in error, it was a mistake, and he cannot make mistakes on the numbers. Speaker 2 notes vaccine studies showing vaccines remain ninety percent effective in preventing hospitalization and death, while Qatar claims the vaccine is the danger. Speaker 1 counters that thousands are dying and the delta variant is “vaccine injured,” citing CDC data, which Speaker 0 disputes as not true. Speaker 1 asserts he does not want to be part of a mass genocide and suggests this era will be remembered as a worst time in history, even worse than World War II. Speaker 0 concludes by calling Speaker 1 crazy. Speaker 2 ends with a reference to North Carolina’s Board of Medicine reprimanding someone prior to COVID.

The transcript describes a contentious exchange about the COVID-19 vaccine and the roles of public health figures and political leaders. Key points include: - Speaker 0 asserts there was a “fake vaccine” pushed by Antony Fauci and Deborah Birx, accusing Trump of failing to fire them and allowing them to “destroy the said economy,” impose “fascist restrictions,” and promote a vaccine that Speaker 0 claims has “killed and maimed breathtaking numbers of people.” The vaccine is described as self-replicating and not proven safe or effective, with the period framed as Trump’s Christmas message in 2020 during Operation Warp Speed. - Speaker 1 counters that millions of doses of a safe and effective vaccine were delivered, thanking scientists, researchers, manufacturing workers, and service members, calling it a “Christmas miracle.” - Speaker 0 then reframes Trump’s stance, labeling the vaccine push as aligned with the agendas of Gates, Fauci, Klaus Schwab, and the World Economic Forum, calling them “the deep state” and asserting that Trump was pushing their agenda rather than opposing it. - A year later, in late 2021, Speaker 0 notes ongoing consequences of the vaccine and the pandemic, while Speaker 1 repeats positive messaging about the vaccine’s safety and effectiveness, and asserts that those who do not take the vaccine may experience more severe illness if they become very sick and go to the hospital. Speaker 1 emphasizes that the vaccine “worked” and that taking it provides protection, while non-vaccination is framed as a personal choice. - In the ensuing exchange, Speaker 1 makes a historical analogy, claiming the vaccine is “one of the greatest achievements of mankind,” noting that during the Spanish flu there were no vaccines, and claiming three vaccines were developed in less than nine months, whereas it would normally take five to twelve years. - Speaker 2 interjects, noting that more people died under Biden than under Trump during the year being discussed, and that more people took the vaccine that year, prompting a defense from Speaker 1 that the vaccine is effective and reduces the severity of illness, while if one contracts COVID, the illness is minor with vaccination. - The sequence ends with Speaker 0 labeling what was said as “utter, utter mendacity” and “Lying.” Overall, the transcript centers on a polarized debate over the vaccine’s safety and efficacy, the motivations and actions of public health officials and political leaders, contrasting claims that the vaccine was a dangerous, coerced plot with claims that it was a safe, efficacious public health breakthrough. It also juxtaposes Trump’s mixed public positions from 2020–2021, ranging from criticism of the vaccine push to praise of the vaccine as a major achievement.

Speaker 0 acknowledges reports of myocarditis and pericarditis associated with the Pfizer vaccine but seems unsure about the mechanism behind it. Speaker 1 asks if the vaccine was tested for its ability to stop virus transmission before being released. Speaker 2 questions if people were forced to get vaccinated to keep their jobs and asks Speaker 0 to retract their statement. Speaker 0 clarifies that everyone had the choice to get vaccinated or not, and they don't believe anyone was forced.

Speaker 0 says 25% of Americans believe they know someone who was killed by a COVID vaccine, emphasizing that this percentage is “killed.” Speaker 0 also states that 52% of Americans believe the vaccines are causing injuries, including death. Speaker 0 then discusses Pfizer clinical trial studies, saying that the released Pfizer study had 22,000 people in the placebo group and 22,000 people who received the vaccine. Speaker 0 claims that, at the end of the study, people who received the vaccine had a 23% higher death rate from all causes. Speaker 0 adds that Moderna has not released its clinical trial studies. Speaker 0 then responds to a question about whether the death rate could be caused by the disease itself, stating, “If it is, then the vaccine doesn't work, does it?” Speaker 0 continues with additional responses that the exchange indicates uncertainty about the implications of the higher death rate.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they personally administered any COVID-19 vaccinations and informs them they may be personally liable and prosecuted under the Nuremberg Code. Speaker 0 claims COVID was a hoax and the shots are for depopulation, having killed or permanently disabled millions. Speaker 1 states the company is liable, not them, because they made sure beforehand that the company would take responsibility and support them administering the shots.

The speakers discuss the potential effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Speaker 1 explains that the idea of DNA fragments and reverse transcription in vaccines is a distinct possibility proven in vitro (in the laboratory) but not as solidly established in real-life humans. He says the machinery exists to reverse transcribe the synthetic mRNA in “these gene products” but notes skepticism about certain public figures and officials who allegedly ignored earlier communications. He cites Denis Rancourt’s data, claiming the vaccine has killed 17 million people and that the injury-to-kill ratio is 34.4. He translates this to global totals of 602 million injured or killed, with approximately 700,000 Americans killed and 2.5 million injured in the United States, describing this as an unprecedented injury-to-kill ratio in medicine and military contexts. He asserts that deadly gene products should have been removed from the market and from Florida two years ago. Speaker 0 asks whether Latipo was alerted two years ago and whether he ignored the warnings. Speaker 1 confirms that Latipo, Ashley Moody, and DeSantis did not respond to communications over the past two years, but notes that Latipo is now taking some action. The conversation shifts to how people can respond health-wise. Speaker 1 contends that health care systems and governments are corrupt, claiming the government has spent trillions of dollars to capture healthcare systems and push dangerous narratives. He urges listeners to leave the conventional healthcare system, describing it as corrupt and implying that healthcare professionals are silenced or fired for speaking out. He promotes an alternative health approach through a parallel system and mentions an emergency medical kit intended to address multiple dangerous diseases and scenarios, asserting that timely access to certain drugs is limited through ordinary medical channels. Throughout, Speaker 1 emphasizes drastic distrust of mainstream medical and governmental institutions, urging viewers to seek alternative health solutions and to prepare for potential health crises. He repeats that the traditional healthcare system is compromised and advocates a shift toward a different healthcare approach and emergency preparedness, including access to medications outside standard channels.

In this video, the speakers discuss Dr. Fauci's alleged involvement in a plot to kill millions of people. Speaker 1 suggests that Dr. Fauci is not innocent and is aware of his actions, but does not have specific information about his involvement. Speaker 2 mentions that Dr. Buttar, known for spreading COVID disinformation, has a large following and promotes conspiracy theories about COVID being a planned operation to depopulate the earth. Speaker 1 also claims that more people are dying from the COVID vaccine than from COVID itself, which Speaker 2 refutes. Speaker 1 compares Dr. Fauci to Hitler, while Speaker 2 emphasizes the importance of vaccines and criticizes Dr. Buttar's false information. The video concludes with Speaker 1 expressing concerns about the vaccine's safety and the potential for a mass genocide.

Speaker 0 states that “there’s 25% of Americans who believe that they know somebody who was killed by a COVID vaccine,” emphasizing “killed” and “killed,” and repeating that the figure is “25% of Americans.” Speaker 0 then says “52% of Americans believe that the vaccines are causing injuries, including death,” and repeats “52%.” Speaker 0 continues by discussing clinical trial studies and what has or has not been released. Speaker 0 says that “if you look at the clinical trial studies, the actual studies that were done that were released of the Pfizer vaccine,” “Moderna has not released it.” Speaker 0 then specifies the Pfizer trial numbers: “If you look at the Pfizer vaccine, there were 22,000 people in the placebo group, 22,000 people who got the actual vaccine.” Speaker 0 presents an outcome claim tied to those groups, saying: “And the people who got the vaccine had a 23% higher death rate from all causes at the end of that study.” Speaker 0 frames a question regarding whether the higher death rate could be related to the disease itself. Speaker 0 says: “But that could not be the disease itself?” and then asks, “No, well... Because we know that...” Speaker 0 then brings up a logical implication, saying: “If it is, then the vaccine doesn't work, does it?” Speaker 0 responds to this with a partial back-and-forth, stating: “Well, it's certainly... Well, no, no, that's not, that's...” ending mid-thought. Overall, the transcript centers on Speaker 0’s reported survey-style figures (25% believing they know someone killed by a COVID vaccine; 52% believing vaccines cause injuries including death) and Speaker 0’s discussion of Pfizer clinical trial study details (placebo group size of 22,000; vaccine group size of 22,000; a claimed 23% higher death rate from all causes for those who received the vaccine at the end of the study), alongside Speaker 0’s statement that Moderna has not released the corresponding clinical trial studies. The transcript also includes a question-and-response exchange about whether the observed death-rate difference could be due to the disease itself and what that would imply.

The speaker believes the population was primed to fear a barely studied vaccine, leading to a reckless drug rollout that would create another wave. They claim the vaccine has likely killed more people than the virus itself. Referencing "John's work," the speaker alleges the vaccine has caused at least 550,000 deaths in the United States. They suggest that reported COVID-19 deaths are inflated due to comorbidities and iatrogenic deaths, estimating the true virus death toll to be a tenth of what is claimed and far less than vaccine deaths.

You think Dr. Fauci is involved in a plot to kill millions? I believe he’s not innocent and knows what he's doing, but I can't confirm the details. Some doctors, like Dheeraj Bhutar, spread dangerous COVID disinformation. He claims more people die from the vaccine than from COVID, which is false. Bhutar believes the pandemic was planned to reduce the population, comparing Fauci to Hitler, which is absurd. He encourages distrust in vaccines, despite evidence showing their effectiveness in preventing hospitalization and death. Bhutar has been banned from social media for spreading falsehoods but continues on other platforms. He insists the vaccine is more dangerous than the virus, despite contradicting data. He claims we’re witnessing a mass genocide, comparing it to World War II, which is a dangerous perspective.

Dr. Bhatar is accused of spreading dangerous COVID disinformation, including conspiracy theories about Dr. Fauci and the pandemic. He suggests that the COVID vaccine is causing more deaths than the virus itself and compares Dr. Fauci to Hitler. Despite being removed from Facebook and Instagram, he continues to spread false information on Twitter, Telegram, and his website. Dr. Bhatar questions the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine, but his claims are refuted by scientific evidence. He also admits to sharing a doctored photo but denies intentionally spreading false information. Overall, his views are widely discredited, and he is criticized for endangering lives by promoting vaccine hesitancy.

The transcript centers on a heated discussion about COVID-19 misinformation and prominent figures blamed by conspiracy theories. Key points include: - Speaker 0 questions whether doctor Fauci is involved in a plot to kill millions; Speaker 1 responds that Fauci is not an innocent bystander but is not privy to the full extent of his involvement. The exchange emphasizes uncertainty about Fauci’s exact role. - Speaker 2 describes Dirashad Bhattar (Dr. Bhattar) as one of the top spreaders of disinformation about COVID-19, noting he once had more than a million followers and is cited by the Center for Countering Digital Hate. Bhattar is accused of spreading dangerous misinformation on COVID-19 across social media. - The dialogue presents multiple disinformation claims attributed to Bhattar: - “More people are dying from the COVID vaccine than from COVID.” - “Red Cross won’t accept blood from people who have had the COVID nineteen vaccine.” - A post claiming most who took COVID vaccines will be dead by 2025. - The overarching conspiracy theory that COVID was a planned operation, politically motivated as part of a secret global plot to depopulate the earth. - The participants debate whether the pandemic was planned. Speaker 0 asks if the pandemic was planned; Speaker 1 says yes but admits uncertainty about who organized it and why. Speaker 1 suspects research suggesting population reduction or minimized reproduction rates. - Qatar (Bhattar) is criticized for comparing COVID and the vaccine to World War II and for labeling Fauci as Adolf Hitler; Speaker 1 rejects comparing Fauci to Hitler and references Nazis who killed six million Jews. - The conversation includes a warning from Speaker 3: “Lies cost lives in a pandemic. If you're encouraging people not to vaccinate, you will cause people to lose their lives.” - The dialogue describes Bhattar’s messaging as using “false twisted information and unproven conspiracies” and notes his removal from Facebook and Instagram, while he remains active on Twitter, Telegram, and his own website. - Vaccine effectiveness is debated. Speaker 1 asserts the vaccine is “very effective at what it was designed for perhaps, but it's not preventing death,” and claims “the delta variant is all vaccine injured,” citing CDC data as evidence. Speaker 2 counters that vaccines remained ninety percent effective in preventing hospitalization and death and asserts Bhattar asserts the vaccine is the danger. - A claim about a doctored AstraZeneca packaging photo from September 5 is discussed: Bhattar retweeted a photo that appeared to indicate the vaccine was made in 2018; Speaker 1 labels the image as fake, while Speaker 0 questions why he would share it. The discussion highlights accountability for misinformation and the impact of misrepresentations on followers (Bhattar reportedly had 1,200,000 followers at one point). - The dialogue ends with a remark from Speaker 0 calling Bhattar’s views “crazy,” and a brief, abrupt note that, before COVID, North Carolina’s board of medicine reprimanded (incomplete thought).

Speaker 0 argues that 'the trustworthiness of the information that we actually receive from the news media' is a major problem and notes that 'the easiest thing for our democratic colleagues to do is to scare people.' He asks, 'COVID nineteen was politicized?' Speaker 1 answers, 'the whole process was politicized' and says 'we were lied to about everything... the vaccines would prevent transmission' and 'they prevent infection'—claims he says are contradicted by 'the animal studies and the clinical trial showed.' He accuses the CDC of letting 'the teachers union' write school-closure orders that 'hurt working people all over the country, and then pretend it was science based.' He adds examples: 'Martin Koldor from Harvard' was 'ejected [from COVID]... because he wasn't in the orthodoxy'; 'FDA during COVID' officials 'Gruber and Krausz' criticized Biden mandates; Biden said, 'I would never take that vaccine, the Trump vaccine' then mandated it and fired top FDA officials who said it had not been properly tested.' The exchange ends with 'Yes.'

Speaker 0 raises a concern about the vaccine, asking why every new paper or study seems to claim the vaccine is responsible for a new problem. The question posed is whether the vaccine is really responsible for every negative outcome discussed in the literature, noting rises in cancers and cognitive decline. The speaker questions the blanket attribution of all adverse effects to the vaccine. Speaker 1 responds by suggesting that the world’s population has been poisoned, stating that the protein was devised in the Chinese security lab in Wuhan, China. The speaker claims it is not a natural protein and is not supposed to be in the body. They assert that one can obtain spike protein from having the infection, which almost everyone has had, and from taking the vaccine. The speaker contends that “it’s almost as if we’ve all been poisoned.” They further claim that the spike protein stays in the body and causes disease, listing several specific adverse outcomes: heart disease, neurologic disease, autoimmunity, blood clots, and maybe even cancer.