TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

"Hey, guys. Just wanted to show you something." "So I've received a ballot from the parliamentary elections from Moldova." "I'm voting by mail this year, here's the thing." "I wanted to vote for the patriarchy block, but it's not on the ballot." "There's no patriarchy block on the list, and it's just insane. Where is it? They are they are supposed to be there. They are not banned. It's not funny." "Who the hell made this ballot? They and I'm supposed to vote for past now. It's not going to happen."

She approached me and said that Donald Trump's wall is meant to keep out women. I asked what he was keeping them out of, and she pointed to how he talks about and treats women, including his wife. She mentioned the inauguration, where he walked ahead and left her behind, showing a lack of care. She expressed that he has disdain for women, citing his infamous comment about grabbing women. I suggested he might have been referring to women who tolerate such behavior, but she had no response to that.

Questioning whether the speaker was kicked out of CPAC, the exchange goes: "And you were kicked out of CPAC. Right?" The reply: "I wasn't kicked out. Or you were disinvited? What what let's there was some kind of drama on Twitter." The other party says: "Don't think so. Tell me everything. There's no drama." The speaker then clarifies: "I, you know, like I said, I came out here I came out here to CPAC last year, had a great time. You know, met my hero, Ben Shapiro. I met my mentor and friend, Casa Dillon. And and so I just came out again this year."

Speaker 0 asks if they can call the officer in case of trouble, but someone questions why they would call the police. Speaker 0 explains that they are here to support women and it is supposed to be a safe event.

We should not ignore global issues and should value women's perspectives. There is a disruption at an academic event and the person is asked to leave for violating university rules. The speaker mentions Cynthia, but the person is still asked to leave. It is important to note something, but the transcript ends abruptly.

You're a poll worker, right? Why did you say Trump is a racist while people were walking in? I'm not a poll worker. But you and others were saying it. How can you tell me that? Whatever. I'll be reporting this to your supervisor.

You're a poll worker, right? What’s the issue? You mentioned Trump is a racist while people were entering. No, I'm not a poll worker. But you all were saying it. No, you were. How can you say that? Whatever. I'll report this to your supervisor.

The speaker reports they have been officially banned from entering the United Kingdom. They state the UK government, under Keirstarmer, deems their presence “not conducive to the public good,” and they express confusion over why being conducive to the public good is a requirement to enter a country. They compare this to thousands of illegal immigrants entering through the Channel daily, noting that “Nobody's asking them to be conducive to the public good,” yet they cannot go to the UK. The speaker mentions they did not apply for an EITA (likely a visa/permit) and had recently returned in September to join the Tommy Robinson rally where they spoke, intending to participate again in May, which now seems impossible. They describe the timing as suspicious, pointing out that three days earlier they posted about Kierst Armour calling out his hypocrisy for wanting to ban X because of women’s safety while allegedly allowing migrant gang rapes to happen. They imply this is connected to the ban as an act to ban free speech. They describe the situation as dystopian and emphasize the severe limitation of their freedom, noting that “as it says in email, I cannot appeal.” They stress they are not convicted of any crime, not under suspicion of any crime, and that the decision was made by Kirstarmer that someone like them is “not welcome in The UK.” The overall claim is that the ban is an abrupt, non-appealable restriction on their entry into the country, framed within accusations of political manipulation and hypocrisy by the UK government and Kier Starmer.

A reporter from the Daily Caller News Foundation approached a woman at her home, stating they were curious about the occupants because of connections to New York Attorney General Leticia James. The woman repeatedly told the reporter they were trespassing and demanded they leave. The reporter asked if she was related to or knew Leticia James, but she gave no comment and continued to insist they were trespassing. The reporter thanked her and left the property.

An individual is confronted on a property and told to leave because it is military property. The individual claims to be a citizen journalist investigating who is staying on the property. They state that the gate is open to the public and that they drove in without issue. They also mention concern for women and children allegedly harmed by unvetted men. The other individual repeatedly demands they leave and threatens arrest, telling them to call the station for information but refusing to provide details themselves. They ask who the journalist represents and who they signed a non-disclosure agreement with.

The speaker and another person are having a conversation about not being able to take a video. The speaker asks why they can't take a video and the other person tells them they are not allowed. The speaker insists they are already there and asks again why they can't take a video. The conversation becomes heated and the other person asks the speaker to leave, accusing them of forcing their way in. The speaker is then asked to leave again and the conversation ends abruptly.

I've uncovered thousands of contributions and spoken with individuals in Maryland who deny making the donations attributed to them. Act Blue is listed as the pass-through for this money on your website. I am asking, do you work for Act Blue? Why the secrecy about your activities? Are you affiliated with the ACLU? Upon showing my OMG press badge, I was immediately asked to leave and threatened with arrest for trespassing. I have the right to be here.

Hey, I'm Adam Gillette with Accuracy and Media. I heard you were coaching a parent on how to break laws regarding biological boys and girls in sports. Is that true? No response. Is there someone else we should talk to? You can check with security downstairs. We're fine waiting here to possibly speak with her further. No? Okay, great.

Speaker 1 is confused about why they are being asked to leave a presidential campaign event. Speaker 0 explains that it is because they are on private property. Speaker 1 questions why they are being kicked out if they work for Nikki's campaign and were told to sign up for the event. Speaker 0 refuses to answer questions and asks Speaker 1 to leave. Speaker 1 insists that they received an email and text instructing them to sign up for the event. Speaker 2 also asks Speaker 1 to leave, but Speaker 1 argues that they are asking nicely too. Speaker 0 reiterates that they don't have answers and that Speaker 1 must leave the premises.

Let's go outside. What's happening, officer? They want you to leave. Why? It doesn't matter; they've asked you to go. We were just recording. I don't know why they said you were uninvited. They asked me to escort you out. Did they say you couldn't record? Everyone's using their phones. I can't answer any more questions, but she's looking into it.

A business owner states she is being harassed for supporting Trump, including having her car scratched. She accuses a woman of wanting her to remove Trump flags and suspects the woman is sleeping with Mayor Ernie. She believes half the country hates her for her political views. The business owner requests a trespass form for the woman. She claims she is in a peaceful space and doesn't understand why people are acting like girls. She feels the harassment is due to election season and her Trump displays. She expresses disbelief at Kamala being on the ballot. She believes police time is being wasted on "Karens" crying over a sign. She wants to go viral with a video of the harassment and is concerned about what the woman has in her bag.

My name is Kian Bexy from the Countersignal, an accredited journalist at the Alberta Legislature. We're in Edmonton, and access is being blocked by someone who doesn't even claim to be part of the campaign. This individual is preventing multiple journalists from entering the building to cover a potential future prime minister's appointment. Is this the kind of country he aims to create? This behavior is unacceptable, especially when a diverse group of journalists, including students and accredited professionals, are waiting to enter.

Laura Lumber and Ashley Lee inform someone that the event is private and they need to leave. The person insists on asking questions at the town hall, but Laura refuses to engage in a conversation. The person threatens to call the police, but Laura tells them to go ahead. The person complains about being put out in the cold weather and accuses Laura of blocking others from attending. Laura dismisses their complaints and asks them to leave again. The person asks one more time to stay, but Laura denies their request.

I just got kicked out of Target for wearing a hat, and I was told to go back to my country. This made me question where freedom of speech and the right to wear what I want are. People can dye their hair or get tattoos without issue, but my hat seems to provoke a reaction. Everyone should want their country to thrive, regardless of political views. If people are so concerned about freedom, why aren't they practicing it? It feels contradictory to advocate for freedom while restricting it based on differing opinions. Can anyone explain this?

An individual was asked to leave a vehicle due to being a Trump supporter. The driver stated they did not want the individual's money and demanded they exit the car immediately, stating they were not welcome. The driver said they were "dead serious" about the demand. The individual questioned if this was discrimination, to which the driver responded dismissively and reiterated the demand to leave.

I'm at the Aqua Water Supply in Bastrop, Texas, where I encountered a woman who was confrontational about voting. She seemed to be pushing her views on me, claiming I was voting against my own interests. I recorded the interaction, and police were called. An elections administrator explained that election workers are appointed by political parties and that they would find a replacement for the woman due to an ongoing investigation. I expressed my concerns about her presence, especially since she was discussing voting based on race. The administrator assured me she would ask the woman to leave, and I was given contact information for further follow-up. The situation concluded with the woman being escorted away.

We were kicked out for wearing Trump gear—hats and shirts—before we could vote. We were told to remove them first. It seems unfair since there were others wearing Harris shirts without any issues. Why is Trump gear such a problem?

We came to this public square for a peaceful protest to share what we believe society needs: the removal of the craziness surrounding multiple genders, because there are only two. We were greeted with hostility by the rainbow community. Some of our guys have bruises and cuts, but the police did nothing about the physical harm we experienced, even refusing to take details for a complaint. Young women also tried to harm our men, and while we didn't touch them, they blocked our access to a community space. We believe that if you have gender confusion, keep it at home. Public spaces should be free for all, with no priority to any one conversation. We should have been able to enter peacefully.

We just got kicked out of a Kamala rally in Tampa. We’re both local voters and had invites, but as soon as we entered, staffers swarmed us and called the cops. We weren’t causing any trouble. This is supposed to be a party that values free speech and diversity, yet they couldn’t tolerate our presence. The event was barely half full, and they clearly needed more attendees. It’s ironic that they claim to support openness while acting like this. The staffers seemed nervous and took photos of us instead of engaging. That was our brief experience at the Kamala event today.

Hello. Are you okay? Why are you bothering her? So she refused. Yes. But then why force if she refused? But that’s not how you hit on a woman. Okay, but that’s none of your business. Me, it’s none of my business, but stop looking. If he doesn’t like that we’re assaulting women, he can look at me. I like you that way, that doesn’t concern him either. Well, after a while, he’ll stop looking, he’ll intervene. I propose we leave; we’ll leave, it’s at our place, we’re going to leave. And why are you like that? We do what we want, go ahead, please move and end it there. Attention.