reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Secretary of State Raffensperger sent a contractor to Fulton County, known for its voting issues. The contractor witnessed double scanning of ballots, unidentified individuals taking election materials, and discussions about disrupting the election. A 29-page report detailing errors, mismanagement, and chaos in the election was known to state officials since November. This contradicts Raffensperger's claims during a phone call with President Trump. It is unlikely that Raffensperger's office was unaware of the report.

Who determined the number 420,987,987 regarding failed signatures from the 2020 election? That figure comes from analyzing a quarter of the 1,900,000 mail-in ballots in Maricopa County. We had 150 trained workers review the envelopes based on the secretary of state's guidelines, examining each voter record individually. After analyzing 25% of the ballots, we extrapolated the data to arrive at the final number. It's important to note that this analysis only pertains to Maricopa County, which had over 2 million ballots in total, with around 1.9 million being mail-in votes. Yes, that is correct. Thank you. Proceed.

Based on an analysis of voter rolls, it was found that there were 364,000 ineligible voter records in Georgia. The speaker met with Secretary Raffensperger on December 16th to discuss this issue. During the meeting, Secretary Raffensperger acknowledged the large number of ineligible records, stating that about 14% of Americans move every year, making it difficult to clean the rolls due to a lawsuit. However, despite the certification and audits, they never investigated how these ineligible voters actually voted. It was later discovered that 67,000 of them did vote. The speaker believes this was a cover-up and suggests that the GOP should have addressed this issue earlier.

Georgia owes President Donald J. Trump an apology for election fraud. Evidence shows 17,852 votes were counted without ballot images, and 3,930 ballots were scanned and counted twice intentionally. The process involved randomly selecting and rescanning ballots on different days. This deliberate duplication was not an administrative error but human intervention, constituting election fraud. The speaker urges Secretary Raffensperger to investigate independently.

An expert was asked their opinion on the validity of election numbers certified by the secretary of state and the governor. The expert stated that if they were an executive at a publicly traded company, they would never sign off on those numbers, citing the risk of jail time and financial penalties from lawsuits. They concluded that they would never have certified the results and would have resigned instead.

Speaker 0: The election was stolen. A graph shows people who worked for ES&S, Hart, Dominion Voting Systems, ClearBallot, and Smartmatic, recycling through companies. People who worked at Dominion Voting Systems are entering the political sphere and taking over election offices; one county in Texas, after hiring someone who worked for Dominion, went blue for the first time. The speaker walks through information: Dominion using “Serbian technology with Chinese characteristics.” Huawei Bank is involved; there’s no public board saying Bank of China funds anything, but research on Roaming Networks—a relatively unknown Serbian company until 2013—shows it signed a value-added contract with Huawei Bank. Huawei is “the Bank of China.” Roaming Networks built ICT infrastructure and data centers in Serbia, with owner Nenad Kovac identified as the enterprise partner. Some Roaming Networks information may come off their site after this presentation. Dominion Voting Systems has a corporate office in Serbia; a screenshot of the office and a developer on their site is noted. A Serbian legislative leader said, “I know Dominion Voting Systems back in November. They have an office here.” Dominion started rapidly removing Serbian coders from their site/LinkedIn. Code is built in Serbia for a system used in the United States, using infrastructure funded by China, not just China but the Bank of China. A slide discusses Dominion’s enterprise partnership with Huawei, added to the restricted list on 05/16/2019. Roaming Networks references show Dominion Voting Systems using a pure flash storage solution in Dominion’s data center. A photo of Sacramento shows Dominion hardware coming from China, with a bill of lading from a Chinese supplier to Dominion’s McKinney, Texas office. Testing and approval of Dominion hardware show similarities with Smartmatic; the same hardware with different branding. They claim a “tail” behind the scenes—evidence of connections among ES&S, Hart, Dominion, ClearBallot, Smartmatic, with people cycling through these companies. People who once worked at Dominion are now entering election offices; in Texas, a county that hired a former Dominion employee “went blue” by accident with ES&S involved. The speaker calls out Gina Griswold for commenting on Tina Peters and Mesa, and Matt Crane’s role as Arapahoe County clerk and recorder, now head of the County Clerks Association; Crane’s wife previously worked for Dominion and Sequoia Voting Systems. The speaker asserts a public breach of trust requires an audit; if there’s nothing to hide, audits should restore trust. They argue, whether Dominion is the bad actor or not, removal of logs, altering code, and a “trusted build” are problematic, and emphasize the need for audits and investigations to restore trust in elections. Speaker 1: Indicators: a senior Dominion vice president’s name appears on patents; a software engineer involved in the Wayne County, Michigan tabulation center is connected to the software. Coincidences accumulate, suggesting there is a preponderance of evidence with affidavits across the country. The speaker asks which computer produced certain files analyzed yesterday; whether it came from the central count or precincts. Speaker 0: Answers with a non-answer, noting they imaged the main EMS and the tabulation system; servers in the county coordinate precinct information and house audit reports, cast vote reports, error reports, adjudication reports, and access logs. Thumb drives can contaminate the county and state systems if connected to a machine; it’s not unique to Dominion or voting systems but a general risk. They emphasize avoiding white noise and focusing on facts: Dominion is in Serbia; Huawei Bank funds the enterprise partnership and Serbia-based data centers; code is written in Serbia; imaging shows fingerprints of this. They call for audits, note deviations in Georgia (ballots appearing identical in different batches, a shredder truck before January 20 in Georgia, and a leaky arena water claim later proven to be a leaky toilet), and point to media silence. They argue against accepting the gold standard claim and highlight perceived connections to Soros-funded groups. They stress deviations in state and county behavior, urge audits, and compare the election system to a serial killer—unacceptable to let foreign systems run it. Speaker 2: Adds that with 100 indicators, a pattern emerges; reiterates the need to examine which files came from which computer, and questions the integrity of the central count. Speaker 3: Notes the risk of a non-internet-connected thumb drive introducing malware; emphasizes auditing all machines for that reason.

Speaker 0 recounts a recent sit-down podcast-style interview with Andrew Callahan for Channel Five. He says the posted video is only an hour long, but the actual conversation lasted around two and a half hours, and he notes that the posted clip does not reflect what happened. He points to a clip where the question is “Why American city is prospering right now?” and a list of cities is discussed, with responses suggesting prosperity correlates with low state taxes and non-Democrat control. He notes that Denver is described as not prospering, and argues that Andrew did not include this response in the posted clip, implying it would upset his audience. Speaker 1 presents the clip and asserts: “Why American city is prospering right now? Austin. Austin? Name another one? El Paso, Texas.” The dialogue continues with “El Paso, Texas is prospering? Yeah. Nashville. Nashville's doing good. Phoenix is doing good.” The claim follows that “Basically, any place with low state tax is getting a lot of” and then another line, “In any place that's not Democrat.” The exchange then asks for a Democrat city that’s prospering, with the response that Denver would have to be affordable and prospering, and Speaker 1 questions, “Denver. Why are you smirking? It’s not prospering.” The two acknowledge that the Democrat-run states are not prospering, and Speaker 0 notes it’s odd Andrew didn’t include this in the post, suggesting a potential bias or misrepresentation. Speaker 0 then shifts to a separate topic about Somalians and fraud in Minnesota. They state, “89% of the fraud that has been charged inside of Minnesota is by Somalians.” Speaker 1 asks for the source: “Where exactly is that statistic from? You can pull it up on the screen.” They discuss verifying the statistic, with Speaker 1 offering to find it, and Speaker 0 emphasizes that the statistic is presented while noting, “I just wanna make sure we have the exact.” There is a moment where Speaker 1 says, “Oh, do you want me to find it right now? For sure. Just so I can I I don’t know? I I I believe you.” The exchange then shows Speaker 0 claiming that Andrew had to redo or correct the segment due to the fraud claim, and that Andrew’s response seemed to misrepresent the fact. Speaker 0 concludes that these are two examples from the interview where Andrew “literally went out of his way to try and make me look bad,” and asserts that, if he interviews anyone, “you’re gonna get the full product,” claiming to be benevolent in allowing full footage. He encourages viewers to watch the full interview on his second channel.

A conversation takes place between two individuals. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they are aware that Cobb County has passed multiple audits, including a recent signature audit with a 99.99% accuracy rate. Speaker 1 confirms their awareness and mentions attending a press conference where they received recognition. Speaker 0 then asks if Speaker 1 is aware that the audit was supervised by the secretary of state and the Georgia department GBI. Speaker 1 acknowledges this and recalls witnessing the GBI bringing back boxes of ballots, including an unmarked ballot box. Speaker 0 mentions that both the secretary of state and GBI certified the 99.99% accuracy rate. Speaker 1 expresses skepticism, as there were no observers present during the audit, and they rely on their own observations. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 thanking Speaker 1, who responds with "you're welcome."

The speaker asks who determined the number of failed signatures in the 2020 election. Speaker 1 explains that their organization reviewed a quarter of the 1,900,000 envelopes from the election using 150 trained workers. They followed the guidelines in the secretary of state manual and analyzed each voter record individually. The statistics from the first 25% of the ballots were extrapolated to determine the final number, which is specific to Maricopa County. Speaker 0 acknowledges that Maricopa County alone had over 2 million ballots, with about 1.9 million of them being mail-in ballots. Speaker 1 confirms this and the conversation continues.

We submitted a report and complaint to the state election board, hoping for honesty from the Georgia secretary of state's office. We found manipulated votes in machine counts and falsified hand counts. We want the truth to come out and for them to acknowledge the evidence.

Philip Davis identified approximately 4,000 fake double scan ballots in the Fulton County machine recount. Individuals who filed a case, Joe Rossi and Kevin Moncala, advised by Philip Davis, concluded with evidence that those 4,000 ballots were intentionally counted twice in the Fulton recount. In Georgia 2020, there were 3 vote counts. The first vote count had massive manipulation. In the second hand count, digital votes did not match the ballots, so the hand count was falsified to match the first machine count. In the third machine recount, ballots didn't match digital votes so the third count was falsified by double scanning ballots. The effort was to match the first count.

Speaker 0 notes that Wisconsin was the first state where the evidence he and his associate Chris had put together for Peter was presented under oath in a senate committee. The presentation occurred before the Wisconsin senate committee on election integrity.

In August, the speaker announced a plan that had been worked on for over a year. They traveled to every county in the United States, with a team of over 300,000 people, to address issues related to the 2020 election. They found instances of illegal voting, including people voting in counties where they didn't live or were deceased. The speaker showed evidence to county officials, but faced pushback and excuses. One common excuse was that the voting machines were not connected to the internet, which the speaker believed to be a lie.

I received another certified letter from the state election board, proving that both the hand audit and certified machine count in Georgia violated election law. To those who fought for the truth, I say one word: vindicated. Thank you.

Speaker 0 recounts what happened yesterday as it relates to the actual fact pattern of law and a warrant issued by a magistrate judge based on probable cause after evidence was submitted, not a Trump-appointed judge. He notes that the law enforcement process in America works this way. He argues that declarations of perfection of the 2020 election are inconsistent with what happened, and then lays out specifics. He asserts that drop boxes were “invented out of thin air,” with no basis in Georgia law. He says mobile voting units moved through Fulton County to 80% Democrat precincts, 81% Democrat precincts to be precise, and that this was not envisioned in Georgia law. He claims 6,800,000 absentee ballot request forms with a first-class stamp were mailed to every registered voter in Georgia, again “nowhere envisioned in Georgia law.” He adds that if the same ballots are counted three times, the numbers should match, but they did not. Regarding the recount, he states that 3,930 double-scanned ballots were found in Fulton County alone, and thousands of those were confirmed by the state election board. He notes that Governor Kemp raised concerns from the Rossi report and that there were double-scanned ballots, but even after double scanning, the numbers did not match on the second recount, being off by eight hundred fifty ballots. He asks, “Not one person here can answer the question of how that happened.” He says ballot images were deleted and test ballots were included in the recount process, and that this was confirmed. He then discusses Democrats’ response to legitimate questions about the 2020 election. A former constituent, Derek Summerville, former FBI agent, ran data analysis with Mark Davis. They questioned the 6,800,000 absentee ballot request forms (with a first-class stamp), noting that if a national change of address form was filed, forwarding could occur. They identified reasonable cause to question the validity of 39,141 of those ballots cast. They found that 160 people were registered to vote from a single UPS store, 2,138 from one church in Fulton County, and 1,391 from a shuttered 1,000-square-foot building in Fulton County. The transcript states that thousands of people remain registered to vote in Fulton County at UPS stores, storage units, pack mails, and homeless shelters that haven’t been open for over five years. Summerville and Davis filed objections to these voters, but Stacey Abrams sued them in federal court and they won—Judge Jones ruled in their favor, not Stacey Abrams. The speaker notes that since then, “twelve zero” of the 39, zero voters had been removed from the voter rolls because Summerville and Davis were correct that they were no longer eligible to vote; 9,500 had updated addresses outside Fulton County, proving that those voters were ineligible. Ultimately, 84% of the votes whose eligibility Summerville and Davis challenged were proven to have been invalid voters in the 2020 election. The speaker concludes by urging an end to the charade of the most perfect, most secure election in history and advocates cleaning up Fulton County’s voter rolls for future elections.

Speaker 0 opens by saying he tries to be as transparent as possible and offers to share what the text in court filings was about. Speaker 1 asks to know, and Speaker 0 begins to explain. Speaker 0 reflects on his past views: he has no incentive to lie, he runs a business with his college roommate, and he supported the Iraq War vehemently, supported the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett (calling it a huge mistake and that it wasn’t what he thought), and he supports John Roberts. He says the list of “dumb things” he supported is long, and he has spent the last twenty-two years trying to atone for his support for the Iraq War. Speaker 1 acknowledges appreciation for that, and Speaker 0 continues. He says he isn’t seeking affirmation but explains the text in question concerns a discussion with a producer about election integrity. He describes a January post-election conversation with someone at the White House after Trump claimed the election was stolen. He says he was willing to believe allegations and asked for examples. The White House regional contact offered seven or eight dead people who voted, asserting they could be proven because death certificates and obituaries showed they voted and were on voter rolls. He states he did not claim “slam dunk” proof and insists he does not trust campaigns or campaign consultants, but he believed the claim was verifiable. Speaker 0 recounts going on air with the claim that “seven or ten dead people voted” and listing the names to show the evidence. He says, within about twenty-five minutes, some of the deceased people contacted CNN to say they were not dead, and CNN exposed that he had made a colossal error. He emphasizes that there is nothing he hates more than being wrong and humiliated, and that he should have checked whether someone had died; he acknowledges not checking carefully. Speaker 1 asks why he didn’t say these things on Fox News earlier. Speaker 0 says he did the next day. Speaker 1 contends he did not, and asks for the tape. Speaker 0 asserts he went on air the next day and admits he was completely wrong, blaming the Trump campaign for taking their word and also blaming the staffer who provided the information; he says he is still mad at that person. Speaker 1 challenges ownership of the situation and asks about the influence and the value of his career, implying he holds substantial influence with a top-rated show. They clash over sincerity and the magnitude of his earnings. Speaker 0 denies alignment with the accusation of insincerity, but Speaker 1 remains skeptical and asserts a belief that his sincerity is in question and that his views may be financially motivated. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 telling Speaker 1 to stop and declaring they’re done, as Speaker 1 pushes back about the immense wealth and status, prompting Speaker 0 to end the exchange abruptly.

Based on an analysis of voter rolls, it was found that there were 364,000 ineligible voter records in Georgia. The speaker met with Secretary Raffensperger to discuss this issue, and Raffensperger acknowledged the number. However, despite certifying the election and conducting audits, they did not investigate how these ineligible voters actually voted. It was later revealed that 67,000 of them had cast their votes. The speaker believes this was a cover-up and accuses the GOP of negligence.

The speaker asks the woman if she is aware that Cobb County has passed multiple audits, including a recent signature audit with a 99.99% accuracy rate. The woman confirms her awareness and mentions a press conference where they received recognition. The speaker then asks if she knows that the audit was supervised by the secretary of state and the Georgia department GBI. The woman acknowledges this and recalls being present when the GBI brought back boxes of ballots, including an unmarked one that she believes contained military ballots. The speaker mentions that both the secretary of state and GBI certified the 99.99% accuracy rate, but the woman expresses skepticism due to the lack of observers during the audit. The conversation ends with gratitude.

The speaker states that 37 votes were flipped from President Trump to former Vice President Biden in Ware County. This was discovered by Dr. Earl Martin, who provided certified election results and published hand count results as evidence. The elections director of Ware County confirmed this in writing. The speaker suggests a forensic examination of the machines, but the Secretary of State sent a letter prohibiting it.

Speaker 0 warns that what you’re doing is extremely dangerous, and questions why it is dangerous. Speaker 1 challenges this by asking why it would be dangerous, and clarifies that they are not saying people are voting in certain places, but that people are currently registered to vote there. Speaker 2 interjects, referencing a recent sweep around Fulton County. Speaker 1 reiterates: they see that people are currently registered to vote in places like empty lots and homeless shelters that closed ten years ago, and asks what the other speaker would do if they became secretary of state to address that. Speaker 0 responds that the other party will have to reply to conspiracy theories. Speaker 1 counters that it is not a conspiracy, describing it as a current situation: people are currently registered to vote there, and it’s possible to purchase voter rolls for $45 to verify this. They insist they are not saying people are voting there, but that people are currently registered to vote there, and they reference Jason as the person who can verify that. They further state they will gladly take the other speaker to see if it’s true, arguing that if someone is running for secretary of state, they are in charge of maintaining the voter rolls. Speaker 0 continues to label the claim as dangerous and as conspiracy theory. Speaker 1 again emphasizes that they are not alleging people are voting there, but that people are currently registered to vote there. They reiterate that it took $45 to purchase the voter rolls, and that the same could be done for Fulton County. They mention specific locations where people are allegedly registered to vote: empty lots and a MARTA bus station, and ask whether the other speaker will address that instead of labeling it conspiracy theories. They reference the existence of a death address, 205 Elm Street Northwest, described as an empty lot that one could visit to verify the claim. They ask whether the other speaker, as an elected official who might become secretary of state, cares about ensuring clean voter rolls in a county considered one of the most important in the United States. Speaker 0 maintains that the other party’s approach is dangerous. Speaker 1 repeats the core assertion: it’s not a conspiracy, it’s a current condition where people are registered to vote in empty lots, a MARTA bus station, and other locations, and stresses that the issue is about maintaining clean voter rolls. The exchange cycles through insistence that “people are currently registered to vote there,” the availability of voter-roll data for verification, and the imperative for someone who could be secretary of state to address the integrity of the rolls rather than dismissing the claim as conspiracy theory.

The speaker asks who determined the number of failed signatures in the 2020 election. Speaker 1 explains that their organization reviewed 25% of the 1,900,000 envelopes from the election and analyzed each voter record individually. They extrapolated the statistics from the first 25% to determine the final number, which is specific to Maricopa County. Speaker 0 points out that Maricopa County alone had over 2 million ballots, and their group analyzed 25% of the mail-in ballots to arrive at the 420,987 failed signature verification number. Speaker 1 confirms this.

Philip Davis identified approximately 4,000 fake double-scan ballots in Fulton County's machine recount. Individuals who filed the case, Joe Rossi and Kevin Mokla, advised by Philip Davis, have concluded with evidence that those 4,000 ballots were intentionally counted twice in the Fulton recount. There were three vote counts in Georgia 2020. The first vote count had massive manipulation. In the second count, the digital votes did not match the ballots, so they falsified the hand count to match the first machine count. In the third count, the ballots didn't match the digital votes, so they falsified the third count by double scanning ballots. The whole effort was to match that first count.

A lady called the speaker's Senate office to report that someone had come to her door claiming to update her voter registration, but her card arrived with a Republican affiliation instead of her lifelong Democrat status. The media initially dismissed it as a mistake due to her age. However, after the story was covered, more people started calling the speaker's office with similar experiences. The speaker forwarded these calls to a reporter named Glenna Milberg, who conducted her own investigation. The speaker asked callers to provide information about their neighbors and requested pictures of the individuals who came to their doors. Many people were afraid to speak up due to potential repercussions.

In discussing the 2020 election, the speaker notes that a magistrate judge issued a warrant based on probable cause after evidence was submitted, emphasizing that the process involves a magistrate judge, not a Trump-appointed judge, and that this reflects how the law enforcement process works in America. The speaker then questions the characterization of 2020 as “perfect,” arguing that several irregularities were present in Georgia. - Drop boxes: Claimed to be “invented out of thin air” and not envisioned in Georgia law. - Mobile voting units: Reported to have moved through Fulton County to 80% (81% precisely) Democrat precincts, with the assertion that this was not envisioned in Georgia law. - Absentee ballots: Alleged that 6,800,000 absentee ballot request forms with a first-class stamp were sent to every registered voter in Georgia, a practice the speaker says was not envisioned in Georgia law. - Ballot counting and recount: A recount occurred, with 3,930 double-scanned ballots in Fulton County alone; thousands of those were confirmed by the state election board. Governor Kemp raised concerns about the Rossi report; even after double scanning, the numbers still did not match on the second recount, being off by 850 ballots. The speaker states that no one can answer how that happened. - Ballot images and test ballots: The speaker asserts that ballot images were deleted and test ballots were included in the recount process, with this confirmed. The speaker then discusses responses to legitimate questions about the 2020 election. A former constituent, Derek Summerville, a former FBI agent, worked with Mark Davis on data analysis of the 6,800,000 absentee ballot request forms (sent with first-class stamps). They identified reasonable cause to question the validity of 39,141 of those ballots that were cast. The speaker asserts that 160 people were registered to vote from a single UPS store, 2,138 from one church in Fulton County, and 1,391 from a shuttered 1,000-square-foot building in Fulton County. The claim is made that Fulton County has a messy voter roll, with thousands registered at UPS stores, storage units, pack mails, and homeless shelters that had not been open for over five years. When Summerville and Davis filed objections to these voters, Democrats responded by litigation: Stacey Abrams sued them in federal court, and they won—though the speaker clarifies it was Summerville and Davis who won, not Stacey Abrams. Judge Jones ruled in their favor. Regarding the 39,141 voters deemed questionable, the speaker asserts that twelve zero of them were removed from the voter rolls, and that 9,500 had updated addresses outside Fulton County, corroborating that those voters were ineligible. Ultimately, the speaker claims that 84% of the eligibility challenges made by Summerville and Davis were proven to involve invalid voters in the 2020 election. The remark concludes by urging an end to the narrative of the most perfect, most secure election in history and calls for Fulton County to clean up its voter rolls ahead of future elections.

We counted Georgia's election ballots three times, confirming no consequential fraud. Despite issues with ballot images and scanning errors, the recount showed similar results to the original count. Doubts remain about double scanning and counting of votes, suggesting potential fraud. The Secretary of State's office conducted an exhaustive investigation, but concerns persist about the accuracy of the results. The Georgia State Election Board is commended for their diligence and transparency in addressing election issues.