reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: Vaccines date back to 1626 poisoning the people. Okay? Poisoning the people since 1626. This is not new. They're not like, oh, we got some new stuff, and it's not the snake venom or anything else. It's just poison is what it is. They've been poisoning the people since 1626 with vaccines. So no child, no adult, no grandma, no grandpa, no mother, no nothing needs any shots, whether it be tetanus, whether it be rabies, whether it be anything. You do not need to put any shots into your animal, your grandma, your father, your mother, your children. That's it. It's straight poison. And there's a great picture from 1885, and it says, vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate. There is money in the side effects. That's it. That is all vaccines. Money in the side effects for the pharmaceutical companies to poison the people and just keep making money off of them. You go back into the nineteen hundreds and doctors used to claim there were no cases of cancer in an unvaccinated person. How about the Amish? The Amish don't put a single vaccine into their body, And you notice that the Amish look pretty darn healthy. Well, altogether. Why? They're not injecting themselves with poison. It makes no sense. So there's all these cultures who didn't use this garbage. And then as they now become like modernized and they start putting this garbage into them their body, then all of a sudden, people start coming down with all the same illnesses. I got autoimmune, lupus. I got allergies. I got this. I got that. Right? Right? All those things. Where do you think they're all stemming from? They get you as you're young because you don't have the ability to consent. Right? Tell that tell the doctor to take the needle and stick it in themselves. Give themselves their own boosters and vaccines. You don't need to do that. And I think people need to stand the ground with that because there has never been a single vaccine that has ever helped helped anybody.

There are thousands of pets out there dining out every day. While we sat at this table, five, six pets died in The United States from a rabies vaccine they didn't need. Anybody can walk in here, sit down and say whatever they want, but I gave you silence. I said to the state board, if I had to kill an animal to obey that law, would I have to do They said yes. One rabies vaccine is good for life. All this is unnecessary if that dog had a titer check, it would not need a vaccination. So this is the real problem here. I had put upstairs in the public health department 45 articles that show vaccines are dose dependent. Titers indicate immunity. It's been proven. Okay. But who's the we? Who's the we? The researchers. The researchers. These are the researchers. They're the ones who do the research. Okay. I spent a career the pharmaceutical. And I spent a career being a veterinarian watching the animals die. See. Think that happened before. But I completely don't agree with what you're saying. Do you know of any studies that the vaccine can sometimes create other health concerns for animals? Can you talk a little bit about that? Absolutely. You get tumors at the injection sites. You get autoimmune diseases that start later in life, but you get the immediate reactions. Some dogs die immediately of anaphylaxis. Others get just serum sickness and they vomit. Maybe you hide under the bed for a day or two. But if I lower my dose to protect the animal, then I'm in trouble. So I have to do what the manufacturer says. And like the State Board of Connecticut said, if I have to kill my pet, I have to kill my pet. It's the law. Well, guess what? I have a Hippocratic oath that is greater than any law that's passed in the state of Connecticut that would make me kill my patient. I won't do it.

The transcript discusses a plan attributed to the U.S. Department of Agriculture to airdrop oral rabies vaccines into six states over the course of a month, continuing a process that started in August in other states. The states named are Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, all of which are expected to receive these vaccines. The plan involves dropping edible satchels of food that are designed to attract wildlife. These satchels are described as containing an oral rabies vaccine, so that when wildlife consumes them, the animals are vaccinated against rabies. It is stated that this vaccination occurs without the animals’ consent, noting that animals cannot give consent. A key question raised is what would come next after this initial distribution. The speaker asks about the implications if these satchels are spread across the stated areas and whether there will be any impact on domestic pets. The transcript asserts that the satchels are intended for wildlife vaccination and that if cats and dogs end up consuming one of the satchels, it should be okay for them and they would simply be vaccinated against rabies. The speaker contends that many people have presumably already vaccinated their animals against rabies, so the program is framed as not causing harm to pets. The speaker then reflects on the broader pattern, asserting that this is how such programs begin. The argument is made that the authorities start with animals, referencing a history of starting with animals when a rabies problem is presented as an epidemic in wildlife. The speaker notes that people are concerned about wild animals biting dogs and other animals, and that the plan is presented as a measure to prevent rabies transmission in the animal population. Finally, the transcript asserts a claim about the progression of this approach, stating that this is how it begins and arguing that there is a suggestion of eventual vaccination or interventions targeting the human population, asserting that “they’ve already started to do this” with humans. The overall content centers on the described vaccination plan, its intended wildlife focus, its effects on pets, and concerns about potential expansion to humans.

The USDA approved self-amplifying mRNA injections for rabies and other diseases in cats and dogs. These injections are authorized, widely available for online purchase, and administered by veterinarians. The speaker claims that these injections can possibly shed onto humans. The platform, Nobivac NXT developed by Merck, is available for purchase online. According to the speaker, if pets receive Nobivac NXT, they might shed self-amplifying RNA or antigens onto owners through bodily fluids. The speaker asserts that this was not tested and was authorized regardless. The effects are currently unknown.

The transcript discusses the book Vaccinations Do Not Protect by Eleanor McBean, claiming that vaccination goes against the constitution to take this “garbage.” It asserts that most people don’t know that doctors do not take the shots themselves or give them to their own children, yet they administer them to other people’s children because they receive a commission. It notes that certain physicians have observed patterns such as paralysis within twenty-four hours after the injection, up to six months after, cancer near the injection area, and diseases such as TB within twenty years. The speaker claims that Edward Jenner, the father of vaccination, noticed a similar pattern in 1796, describing it as poisoning the people. The question is posed: why do they do this? The answer given is that vaccination is a big business, and that it is protected by the government. The speaker asserts that vaccination was protected by the government in 1986 so that people cannot sue. It is stated as part of the argument that vaccination is the leading cause of why children die under the age of 15.

Speaker 0 asserts that there is no safe vaccine on the childhood schedule and labels themselves an anti-vaxxer because no vaccine has been properly tested for safety. They state that, in the book Vax Facts, you are more likely to die from the vaccine than from the disease for which there is a vaccine, and that this is true for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule. They acknowledge that death from the vaccine is still a death and “super rare,” but claim you are much more likely to die from the vaccine. They ask which do you want: a greater chance of dying from the vaccine or a lesser chance of dying from the disease, noting that for many of these diseases, the risk is zero.

According to the speaker, most vaccines have never been tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate their safety. The speaker claims that vaccines contain aluminum compounds because many dead vaccines don't mount an immune response without them. The speaker alleges that in a Gardasil vaccine study, the placebo group received an aluminum adjuvant instead of a true placebo, resulting in similar side effect profiles between the active vaccine and placebo groups. The speaker asserts that Merck used a novel aluminum compound and that data suggests aluminum in vaccines is profoundly toxic. The speaker states that the only true randomized controlled trial involving a vaccine was conducted on sheep with blue tongue disease. The results allegedly showed that the aluminum in the vaccine was toxic, causing the sheep to become sick, unsociable, and, in some cases, die. The speaker concludes that the assumption that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines are safe is unfounded and has never been tested.

The speakers discuss rabies and vaccinations in a provocative, conspiratorial frame. They claim rabies is nonexistent and that the treatment, the vaccine, is worse than the disease. They question the idea of compulsory vaccination, asserting that mandates are voluntary until you agree to them, and describe mandates as a game. They compare the rabies test to the pandemic-era testing method, suggesting the test for rabies relies on tests that produced positive results for illnesses, implying deception. They note that in the early 1900s, rabbits were the primary diagnostic tool: brain tissue from a suspected dog injected into two rabbits; if the rabbits died, rabies was proven. They present the vaccine as having many side effects and cite an instance where 38 dogs and cats given a Merck vaccine experienced seizures, aggression, and death, labeling the vaccine “Safe and effective” as something they dispute. They propose solutions: finding a holistic veterinarian who can grant a medical exemption, or simply saying no to vaccination. They claim it’s possible to make a vet sign a vaccination guarantee that nothing will happen to an animal after the injection, and suggest vets won’t sign such a guarantee. The conversation closes with a clip asserting that if you are unvaccinated, the virus will hunt you out or find you, repeating the claim that the virus will locate unvaccinated individuals. Overall, the dialogue presents a skepticism toward rabies biology and vaccination, asserts that vaccines have harmful side effects, questions mandates, and promotes exemptions or refusals, culminating in the assertion that viruses target the unvaccinated.

- The speaker presents a checklist for healthy cats and dogs and raises controversial claims about vaccines, diet, and technology used on pets. - Vaccination critique: Vaccines are pushed because “there’s money in the side effects,” and a claim is cited from the book Poison Needle by Eleanor McBean that “Rabies doesn’t even exist, but they poison the animals anyways.” - Diet recommendations: Advocates raw diets for dogs and cats, specifically “Raw meat, raw milk. Not kibble, processed garbage.” Cites Doctor Pottinger (Dr. Pottinger) who fed 900 cats raw meat and raw milk, reporting no parasites, no dewormers, and silky skin and fur. - Personal anecdote: A friend reportedly gave raw meat and “superfoods” to their dog; the dog supposedly showed no teary eyes, no skin allergies, and no deworming. - Parasites and metals claim: The speaker asserts that parasites are caused by heavy metal pollution; kibble is “loaded with metals,” leading animals to develop worms to counter the metals. - Vaccines and implants claim: Vaccines and RFID/chip implants are described as treating animals like lab experiments, allegedly causing tumors in the region where they are placed. - Alternative remedies: Mentions a case where Pearl Powder Shiloh Shot in Dragon’s Blood with a raw diet was given to a puppy, and the puppy was described as happy and healthy with complimenting observations. - Wireless/chemistry claim: Ends with the idea of an “invisible rainbow” (WiFi) that harms animals, suggesting microwave frequencies cook them. List of perceived hazards includes vaccines, kibble, WiFi, RFID chips, and dewormers, all said to contribute to health issues in dogs and cats.

The speaker raises concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine, stating that it skipped animal testing and went straight to human testing. They mention that the animal tests were stopped because the animals were dying. The speaker believes that the American people are now being used as guinea pigs for this experimental vaccine. They express worry about businesses mandating the vaccine for employment despite the rising death count, which they feel is being ignored.

- The speaker asserts that there has never been a single animal with rabies and claims animals are injected to keep veterinarians in business. - If a vet recommends rabies shots, the speaker says you should fire them, alleging the shots promote poison to immunize and then cause a debilitating disease, creating a lifetime patient. - The speaker claims there are no rabid dogs roaming about, and that rabies is fabricated. - They describe the origin of rabies studies as involving rabid dogs kept in cages that went nuts, with the vaccine being placed in the dogs’ heads after they died, and claim this demonstrated the vaccine’s effectiveness. - The speaker asserts that today dogs are still injected for rabies to poison the dogs and create lifelong patients. - Two books are cited as debunking this view: The Contagion Myth by Tom Cowan and The Poison Needle by Eleanor McBean. - The speaker generalizes that professionals, including vets and doctors, are there to keep you as a patient for life.

The speaker raises concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine, stating that it skipped animal testing and went straight to human testing. They claim that the animal tests were stopped because the animals were dying. The speaker suggests that the American people are now being used as guinea pigs for this experimental vaccine. They also criticize businesses that want to make the vaccine mandatory for employees, despite the rising death count associated with it.

Speaker 0 claims that people lie about tetanus and rabies, asserting that rabies doesn’t exist and that dogs are poisoned. They allege veterinarians administer 13 vaccinations to keep the veterinary industry in business, and that the first vaccination against dogs was injected into their brains, followed by more vaccines to sustain the vets. They describe the entire system as intended to keep “these terrorists in business” who constantly poison people and animals, and they state that if a vet truly cared about an animal, they wouldn’t inject it. The speaker asserts that injections of poisons into animals would not lead to health, applying this logic to horses, cats, and wildlife as well. They claim wildlife are vaccinated by the government, referencing deer “spinning around in circles” in the forest as evidence. The call is for people to be aware and to say no, defending their dogs, cats, and even their grandmother, framing it as a constitutional right. They urge listeners to resist vaccination or other medical interventions for family and animals, insisting on a stance of defiance against forced measures. The speaker emphasizes personal agency and the obligation to defend family and animals, portraying vaccination as coercive and harmful. They allude to expressing censored language that would condemn the alleged actions, but refrain from explicit terms. The overall message is a condemnation of vaccines and veterinary practice, framed as a political and constitutional violation, and a directive to resist vaccination and to advocate for personal choice.

The speaker claims that no childhood vaccine has ever undergone a safety trial using a double-blind, placebo-based study. They assert that this type of study, involving a saline injection as a placebo, is the only way to determine the safety of a pharmaceutical product. Furthermore, the speaker states that there has never been a study comparing the health outcomes of children who receive the full schedule of 72 (or potentially up to 90) vaccines to those who receive none. Because of the lack of safety studies and comparative data, the speaker chooses not to inject themselves or their children with vaccines. They want evidence that vaccines are safe and make people healthier.

Pets have died in the US from unnecessary rabies vaccines. The speaker questions the need for these vaccines, suggesting that a tire check would indicate immunity. They mention having provided articles to the public health department that support the idea that vaccines are dose dependent. Another speaker, who has a background in the pharmaceutical industry, disagrees. The first speaker explains that vaccines can cause tumors, immune diseases, and immediate reactions in animals. They express their refusal to follow a law that would require them to harm their patients.

The speaker questions why a large dog and a small dog receive the same volume of rabies vaccine. They suggest over-vaccination may contribute to the rising incidence of cancer in dogs. Bombarding dogs and cats with multiple antigens yearly can cause an inappropriate immune response, preventing the immune system from working correctly, potentially leading to uncontrolled cell growth, like cancer. Some vaccine protocols list up to eight or nine different vaccines given to dogs and cats almost yearly.

Dr. Francis Potenture observed that cats fed cooked food became sick, while those fed raw meat, raw milk, and cod liver oil remained healthy and parasite-free. The speaker claims pet food companies promote cooked food despite its negative effects, arguing that animals would not naturally cook their food. The speaker suggests that cooked food leads to worm infestations, creating a need for medications like ivermectin and heartworm treatments. Furthermore, the speaker alleges that rabies is nonexistent, and vaccinations are administered to keep veterinarians in business. The speaker concludes that feeding pets cooked food causes health issues, leading to unnecessary vaccinations and perpetuating a cycle that benefits the veterinary industry.

The speaker claims that "The USDA last year approved self amplifying mRNA injections for our cats and our dogs for rabies and a few other things. And these are authorized and they're widely available for online purchase." They say "veterinarians across the country are currently injecting self amplifying mRNA into our pets." They warn that "This can probably shut on to humans and this this has to be stopped" and ask, "Has it started yet?" "Yes." They cite "Nobivac Nex NXT, it's the platform developed by Merck" and that "you will find it online, and you can even buy it." They claim it is "possible... they are either shedding the self amplifying RNA or the antigen products that the dogs or cats are now producing onto the owners through bodily fluids." They add that "none of this was tested" and "they just authorized it anyways because they don't care," and that "it's completely unknown really at this point."

The speaker points out that the COVID-19 vaccine was released to the public without completing animal testing, which is unusual, especially for children. The animal testing was stopped because the animals were dying. This means that the American people are essentially being used as guinea pigs for this experimental vaccine. Despite the rising death count, businesses are considering making the vaccine mandatory for employees, which is concerning.

According to the speaker, vaccines have never been tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate their safety. The speaker claims that vaccines contain aluminum compounds because many dead vaccines don't mount an immune response without them. The speaker alleges that in a Gardasil vaccine study, the placebo group received an aluminum adjuvant instead of a true placebo, so the side effect profiles of the active vaccine and placebo groups were the same. The speaker asserts that Merck used a novel aluminum compound and that data shows aluminum in vaccines is toxic. The speaker states that the only completely randomized controlled trial was on sheep using a vaccine for blue tongue disease. The speaker claims the aluminum was toxic, the sheep became sick, their behavior changed, and many died compared to the placebo group. The speaker concludes that the presumption that aluminum as an adjuvant is safe is unfounded and has never been tested.

The speaker is questioned about his stance on childhood vaccines, with many scientific and medical organizations disagreeing with him. The audience asks how they can help him align with science. The speaker clarifies that he is not anti-vaccine, but believes vaccines should undergo safety testing like other medicines. He criticizes the lack of prelicensing placebo-controlled trials for vaccines and cites examples of potential risks and lack of long-term studies. The other speaker argues that there is evidence of vaccines preventing diseases and highlights the importance of distinguishing between association and causation. The speaker emphasizes the need for good science and questions the trustworthiness of pharmaceutical companies. The conversation ends with a discussion about the speaker's family not supporting his views on vaccines.

Speaker 0 states that there has never been a single animal with rabies and claims animals are injected to keep vets in business. They assert that if your vet tells you your animal needs rabies shots, you should fire them. They claim all they’re doing is promoting poison so they can inject your animal, then your animal can come down with a debilitating disease, and then they have a patient for life. They define rabies as “There is no rabid dogs running around, and they're gonna get you in anything else.” They describe the first studies on rabid dogs as dogs that were locked in cages and went completely nuts, and allege the guy who created the rabies vaccine stuck it in the dog's head and said that the rabies vaccine worked after the dogs died. They assert that to this day, they are still injecting dogs for rabies, calling it a fake illness, to poison the dogs to have patients for life, calling it truly sick and twisted. They cite The Contagion Myth by Tom Cowan and The Poison Needle by Eleanor McBean as debunking this, and claim vets do the same thing as doctors—there to keep you as a patient for life. That is what they’re going to say about.

Somebody said you've opened my eyes to a lot. Our dog continues to struggle since the vet gave her two shots. This is the problem: all of those vets, unfortunately, that's just they that's why they give these animals shots. They're just giving them shots so that they can stay in business. They poison your dog as a puppy or as a kitten, whatever it may be, so that they can stay in business. So what you need to do is need to fire the the vet that you're going to if they're pushing shots onto any of your animals and find yourself a holistic vet or just fire them altogether because all your animal needs is raw meat and raw dairy. That's pretty much it. Because think of animals. When they're out in the wild, that's pretty much all they're eating. They're not cooking anything up. They're not eating kibble. They're not eating, you know, processed foods. They're literally just out there hunting, and they don't definitely don't have a fire to cook up their meals before they eat them. But the whole thing into that, when you get in into the shots, you know, the book, the poison needle, just a phenomenal one so people can be aware of that.

The speaker treats vaccine injuries, stating that 70% of their practice involves them. They claim rabies vaccines are among the worst. They were shocked to learn that there has been no canine strain of rabies in the US for 14 years, suggesting that dogs are being unnecessarily killed or restrained. The speaker believes that over-vaccination is occurring constantly. They assert that no vaccine is safe, and no vaccine is 100% effective.

Dr. Francis Potenture observed that cats fed cooked food became sick, while those fed raw meat, raw milk, and cod liver oil remained healthy and parasite-free. The speaker claims pet food companies promote studies against raw food, despite the absurdity of pets cooking their food in the wild. The speaker suggests that cooked food leads to worm infestations, creating a need for medications like ivermectin and heartworm treatments. Furthermore, the speaker alleges that rabies is nonexistent, and vaccinations are administered to keep veterinarians in business. The speaker claims that vets recommend cooked food, causing health issues, then administer vaccinations for fake illnesses, creating a cycle that benefits the veterinary industry.