reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Please take your seat. Because some members are still disrupting decorum, I am directing the sergeant at arms to restore order, and remove this gentleman from the chamber.

The events on Friday were unacceptable and embarrassing to the House and Canadians. The speaker should listen to members and step down. Translation: What happened on Friday was not okay and brought shame to the House and Canadians. The speaker should heed the members' calls and resign.

I request unanimous consent to remove the recognition given by the Speaker of the House to an individual present in the gallery during a joint address to parliament by Volodymyr Zelensky. This removal should be done from the House of Commons Debates of September 21, 2023, and any House multimedia recording. Thank you.

Speaker 0 asks what bible verse the other person posted that led to criminal prosecution. Speaker 1 responds: it was from Romans chapter 1, verses 24 to 27. Speaker 0 asks why that passage was chosen. Speaker 1 explains that the apostle Paul teaches in these verses about marriage and same-sex relationships, and he defines them as sinful and shameful. Speaker 0 asks what message they were trying to convey. Speaker 1 says they wanted to make it clear that if the leadership of the church is supporting the pride event, it is in contradiction with the Bible. Speaker 0 notes that after posting the verse, the person was charged under Finland's war crimes and crimes against humanity law. Speaker 1 confirms that there is a law in that section about agitation against minorities. Speaker 0, speaking as a pastor with thirty-seven years of experience, expresses deep concern that someone can be criminally charged for posting a Bible verse in an EU and NATO country. The person notes the panel’s prior statements and offers a blessing to the speaker, expressing a prayer that it causes people to wake up to threats against the right to free expression.

Speaker 0 requests unanimous consent to remove recognition of an individual from the House of Commons Debates and multimedia recording. Speaker 1 asks for unanimous consent but is met with opposition. Speaker 2 expresses disappointment and compares the incident to the importance of learning from history. Speaker 1 interrupts, stating that the discussion is becoming more of a debate.

I request to remove the recognition of an individual during a joint address to Parliament by Volodymyr Zelensky from the House of Commons Debates and Multimedia Recording. Unanimous consent is not achieved.

I request unanimous consent to remove the recognition given by the Speaker of the House to an individual present in the gallery during a joint address to parliament by Volodymyr Zelensky. This removal should be done from the appendix of the House of Commons Debates on September 21, 2023, as well as from any House multimedia recording. Thank you.

Please show respect by not talking while others are speaking. Let's have a level playing field and show respect both ways. Thank you.

Friday's events were unacceptable and embarrassing to the House and Canadians. The speaker should listen to members and step down.

Speaker 0 launches a confrontation about books, insisting that new books should be purchased and that she must get rid of “the 500 filthy books that you have.” She says she will read one aloud and warns that if there are children in the audience, they need to leave. Speaker 1 interrupts, stating this is a public hearing and that the book content must not be read if it is not appropriate in public. Speaker 0 objects, asking why the content is in schools, claiming the content is in public schools. Speaker 0 continues, asserting, “This this book your time,” and references DeBakey, Furr, and Heights High School, saying, “His cock was enormous.” Speaker 1 responds firmly, declaring that this is not allowed and that Speaker 0 is out of order, issuing a first warning and threatening removal with one more word. Despite the warning, Speaker 0 persists. Speaker 0 then describes explicit actions connected to the content: “She wrapped her hand around his cock.” Speaker 1 reiterates that it is not permitted and maintains the order that Speaker 0 is out of order. Speaker 0 further describes explicit sexual action: “head tongue sliding into the small slip,” continuing to read or reference the material in a manner that violates the presiding rules of the public hearing. Speaker 1 again instructs that if the content is not to be allowed, it should be removed, so that the children do not have access to it, and warns that Speaker 0 is being removed, thanking the people present and acknowledging the authority to remove them. The exchange ends with Speaker 0 muttering, “My name is,” before the transcript cuts off, leaving the final identification incomplete. Summary of key points: - Speaker 0 demands the purchase of new books and the removal of “500 filthy books,” and declares she will read one aloud, telling children to leave if present. - Speaker 1 enforces public hearing decorum, arguing some content is not appropriate for public display in schools. - Speaker 0 references sexual content tied to books allegedly in DeBakey, Furr, and Heights High School, including explicit phrases: “His cock was enormous.” - The exchange escalates with explicit descriptions, and Speaker 1 issues warnings and orders removal to maintain safety and propriety for the audience, especially children. - The session ends with Speaker 0 interrupted before finishing their identification.

The committee will come to order. Individuals disrupting the hearing will be removed by Capitol Police. Disruptions from the audience will not be tolerated while the committee conducts its business. The secretary will resume.

I would like to reclaim my time and address the chairman. It seems that Hunter is afraid of what I have to say. It's unfortunate that I burst their bubble.

Do we know the origins of the individuals we're discussing? They're being treated as lawful US citizens, which they are not. I’m cutting this off because we have no reason to investigate or treat people differently based on appearance. Who said that? I did, and Tiffany mentioned it too. There’s no need to discuss this further. Concerns raised by individuals are valid, but we need to move on. I’m asking everyone to leave. I need a motion to adjourn. I motion. Second? All in favor? Good to know. Good to know. I don’t want to hear the truth. This car.

I am resigning as Speaker of the House of Commons due to my mistake in recognizing an individual during a joint address. I apologize for causing pain to the Jewish community, survivors of Nazi atrocities, and others. My resignation is effective tomorrow to allow for the election of a new speaker. Thank you for your support during my term.

I am resigning as Speaker of the House of Commons due to recognizing an individual during a joint address, causing pain to various communities. My resignation is effective tomorrow to allow for the election of a new speaker. Thank you for your support during my term.

Given continued disruptions, I'm directing the sergeant at arms to restore order and remove this individual from the chamber. Members, please maintain decorum in the House.

I made a mistake in recognizing someone during my speech about the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. I apologize for offending many with my remarks and gestures. This was my own decision, and no one else knew about it beforehand. Thank you for listening. Translation: I made an error in acknowledging someone during my speech about the Russia-Ukraine conflict. I apologize for offending many people with my comments and actions. This was my own choice, and nobody else was aware of it beforehand. Thank you for your attention.

Order must be restored. I've observed persistent and intentional disruptions of decorum. Therefore, I instruct the sergeant at arms to restore order and remove the members who are not following the rules.

Our request for approval of a motion of applause and praise to Elon Musk, owner of the social network X (formerly Twitter), for standing up to unfounded political censorship imposed by the Brazilian justice system on platform users in the country. Those in favor, remain as you are. Approved.

I apologize for recognizing an individual during my speech about the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. I regret my decision and apologize for offending many. This was my own initiative, and nobody else was aware of my remarks beforehand. Thank you for your attention. Translation: I apologize for recognizing someone during my speech about the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. I regret my decision and apologize for offending many. This was my own initiative, and nobody else was aware of my remarks beforehand. Thank you for your attention.

Speaker 0 requests unanimous consent to remove recognition of an individual from the House of Commons Debates and multimedia recording. Speaker 1 asks for unanimous consent but is met with opposition. Speaker 2 expresses disappointment and compares the incident to the importance of learning from history. Speaker 1 interrupts, stating that the discussion is becoming more of a debate.

I request unanimous consent to remove the recognition given by the Speaker of the House to an individual present in the gallery during a joint address to parliament by Volodymyr Zelensky. This removal should apply to the House of Commons Debates of September 21, 2023, and any House multimedia recording. Thank you.

Speaker 0 asks what you are here to talk about, says “Thank you very much,” and asks, “Any votes in the prime minister?”

Speaker 0 requests unanimous consent. Speaker 1 acknowledges the official opposition leader. Confusion arises regarding the request.

The speaker requests unanimous consent to enter a letter by Louisiana attorney general Jeff Landry into the record. The letter denounces political violence and calls for respect for all political viewpoints. The speaker emphasizes that unanimous consents are for documents and presents the letter as evidence. Another speaker interrupts to make a unanimous consent request, but it is unclear what they are requesting. The transcript ends with the chair recognizing the gentleman for unanimous consent.