reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker criticizes the World Economic Forum, calling it a billionaire's club that shifts wealth upwards and imposes totalitarian controls. They express disbelief at how world leaders follow WEF's directives, mentioning the wealth transfer during COVID. The speaker condemns the collusion between big companies like Home Depot and Google to censor dissenting voices.

The speaker mentions that integrating young leaders has been a part of the World Economic Forum for many years. They highlight leaders like Merkel and Putin who were once young global leaders. They express pride in the current young generation, including Trudeau and the President of Argentina, who are now part of their cabinets. The speaker also mentions that this is true in France as well. Another speaker raises a concern about outside interference in democracy and asks for transparency regarding which cabinet ministers support the World Economic Forum's agenda. However, due to technical issues, the question is not fully heard, and the debate becomes heated.

The transcript claims that some believe Canada is becoming tyrannical, referencing the Emergencies Act and frozen bank accounts of protestors. Some compare current events to a communist dictatorship. The People's World called for massive federal government action. Protests demanding policy changes are considered worrisome. Justin Trudeau is accused of weaponizing the banking system against peaceful trucker protests and is criticized for admiring China's "basic dictatorship." The transcript then shifts to the World Economic Forum (WEF) and Klaus Schwab, claiming his father's company used slave labor for the Third Reich. The WEF is described as a private organization where world leaders and elites meet in Davos. Schwab is said to be proud of shaping world politics and his global young leaders program is accused of infiltrating cabinets. The "Great Reset" is mentioned as Schwab's solution to global issues, with his mission being to replace independent governance with a one-world government and central bank digital currency. This agenda is described as a quasi-communist scheme leading to enslavement due to increasing indebtedness. Millions of Americans are allegedly priced out of buying homes.

In this video, the speaker criticizes a news article and a social media agency funded by corporate donors. They discuss the term "conspiracy theorists" and its use in mainstream news sources. The speaker then delves into the World Economic Forum and its founder, Klaus Schwab, mentioning his connection to Henry Kissinger and the CIA. They highlight the partners of the World Economic Forum and the high fees they pay to be a part of it. The speaker questions the benefits of membership and suggests that these corporations are investing for their own interests. They argue that globalist organizations prioritize corporate interests over democracy and challenge viewers to find a non-evil corporation among the forum's partners. The speaker also mentions their research on the Bilderberg group and the Atlantic Council.

The speakers discuss a dangerous and divided world, citing threats from Iran, Russia, and China, as well as changing security and commercial relationships with the United States. One speaker mentions having obtained top secret security clearance within three weeks to be informed and make decisions. He then points out that another speaker has refused the opportunity to obtain top secret security clearance for 950 days. The other speaker explains that while he previously held top secret clearance as a minister, he refused the recent offer because it would have gagged him under security law, preventing him from speaking freely about foreign interference without fear of prosecution. He claims Canada has experienced Chinese interference in two elections. He says that refusing the clearance allowed him to speak freely about issues such as a candidate who allegedly threatened a political opponent, and a quarter billion dollar loan obtained in China. The first speaker responds that robust debate has occurred despite the situation, and observes that China is not the only country accused of foreign interference.

We are proud to have infiltrated cabinets globally. A constituent asked about outside interference in democracy, referencing Klaus Schwab from the World Economic Forum boasting about infiltrating half of Canada's cabinet. They requested transparency on which ministers support the WEF's agenda. The audio and video quality were poor, causing disruption. Mention of Prime Minister Trudeau's involvement was made. Translation: We are proud to have infiltrated cabinets globally. A constituent asked about outside interference in democracy, referencing Klaus Schwab from the World Economic Forum boasting about infiltrating half of Canada's cabinet. They requested transparency on which ministers support the WEF's agenda. The audio and video quality were poor, causing disruption. Mention of Prime Minister Trudeau's involvement was made.

The speaker mentions the integration of young leaders in the World Economic Forum. They highlight leaders like Merkel, Putin, Trudeau, and the president of Argentina as examples. They mention attending a reception for Prime Minister Trudeau and note that many members of his cabinet are young global leaders of the World Economic Forum. Another speaker agrees and adds that this is also true in Argentina and France. Then, a member of parliament raises a question about outside interference in democracy, specifically mentioning Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum's alleged infiltration of governments. However, the audio quality is poor, and the speaker is asked to repeat the question. Another member accuses the previous member of promoting disinformation.

The speaker discusses the integration of young leaders in the World Economic Forum. They mention prominent figures like Merkel and Putin who were once young global leaders. They express pride in the current young generation of leaders, including Trudeau and the president of Argentina. The speaker also mentions that this trend is observed in Argentina and France. The conversation then shifts to a member of parliament raising concerns about outside interference in democracy, specifically mentioning Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum. However, due to poor audio and video quality, the discussion becomes fragmented and the member's question is not fully addressed.

Good morning, Justin. I want to address your connection with Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum's agenda. It seems you prioritize your own interests over the people of Canada. Many are becoming frustrated with your actions, and it's time we stand up against this. We have the power to reject mandates and decisions imposed on us. I’m out here wanting to live my life peacefully, but I can’t ignore what’s happening. It’s crucial for us to unite, regardless of our backgrounds, and assert that we’ve had enough of being controlled by a select few. I wish everyone a life filled with adventure and happiness, but we need to confront these issues first. God bless you all.

In this video, a member of parliament raises concerns about outside interference in democracy. They mention Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum (WEF), claiming that the WEF has infiltrated governments worldwide, including Canada's cabinet. The member asks for transparency regarding which cabinet ministers support the WEF's agenda. However, due to poor audio and video quality, the member's question is not fully understood. Another member accuses them of promoting disinformation. Speaker 1 then proudly mentions young leaders like Prime Minister Trudeau and President of Argentina, suggesting that they have influence over cabinet members. The video ends without further elaboration.

The speaker claims that every Canadian prime minister has been compromised by agents of influence working for Chinese intelligence. This poses a significant security risk, raising concerns about who is truly in control of the country. They suggest the need for an independent investigation to protect against future threats, citing Australia's law against foreign interference as a model to follow.

The speaker raises concerns about outside interference in democracy, specifically mentioning Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum (WEF). They question which cabinet ministers in Canada support the WEF's agenda. The speaker's audio and video quality are poor, leading to interruptions and apologies from the speaker. Another member accuses the previous speaker of promoting disinformation, and the debate continues.

The Prime Minister previously supported ENSCOCOP's role in examining foreign interference in Canada's democracy, but there seems to be a shift in stance. Questions arise about whether a recent ENSCOCOP report revealed involvement of Liberals seeking political and financial gain. Is the Prime Minister still committed to transparency and public trust in institutions, or has external influence changed this approach? In response, the Minister for Public Safety emphasizes the importance of oversight, noting that the government established a committee of parliamentarians to monitor security agencies for the first time. This committee includes members from all political parties, and their recommendations have been acted upon to enhance national security and combat foreign interference.

Claims are made that Canada is becoming tyrannical, with a "socialist coup" unfolding, despite previously being hailed as free and democratic. Some view government actions, like invoking the Emergencies Act and freezing accounts of protestors, as evidence of this shift. Concerns are raised about Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's admiration for China's "basic dictatorship" and his government's response to trucker protests. The World Economic Forum (WEF) and its founder, Klaus Schwab, are discussed. Schwab's past, including his father's involvement with a company that used slave labor during the Nazi era, is mentioned. The WEF is described as an influential organization that brings together world leaders and elites in Davos. Schwab is portrayed as aiming to "shape our common future" and having the ability to "penetrate the cabinets" of world governments through the WEF's global young leaders program. The "Great Reset," advocated by Schwab, is presented as a plan for a one-world government and a central bank-controlled digital currency.

Young leaders from various countries, including Angela Merkel, Vladimir Putin, Justin Trudeau, and the President of Argentina, have been integrated into the World Economic Forum. Trudeau's cabinet consists of many young global leaders from the Forum, as does Argentina's. The speaker raises concerns about outside interference in democracy and asks for transparency regarding which cabinet ministers support the Forum's agenda. However, there are audio and video issues, leading to interruptions and debates among the members.

The speaker from Halton Hills accuses the government of neglecting national security, citing documents that show collaboration between Canadian government employees and Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's claim that no sensitive information left the country is contradicted by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still supports those comments. Translation: The speaker criticizes the government for ignoring national security concerns and collaborating with Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's statement that no sensitive information left the country is disputed by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still stands by those remarks.

The speaker discusses a document revealing foreign interference in the 2019 Canadian federal election involving Chinese individuals, community leaders, and politicians. They mention CSIS briefings on PRC interference in the elections, implicating candidates and staff. The panel received briefings on PRC's pragmatic interference tactics. The speaker confirms CSIS briefings to the panel but struggles to recall specific details. The language used in the briefings aligns with public summaries on PRC's activities.

In this video, a member of parliament raises concerns about outside interference in democracy. They mention Klaus Schwab, the head of the World Economic Forum, who allegedly claimed that his organization has infiltrated governments, including Canada's cabinet. The member asks for transparency regarding which cabinet ministers support the WEF's agenda. However, the audio and video quality are poor, leading to interruptions and apologies from the speaker. Another member accuses the first member of promoting disinformation. Then, a third member thanks a colleague for their speech and intends to ask a specific question related to the legislation being discussed.

The speaker discusses the integration of young leaders in the World Economic Forum, highlighting figures like Merkel and Trudeau. They mention how many young leaders are now part of cabinets in countries like Canada and Argentina. Another speaker raises concerns about outside interference in democracy by the World Economic Forum, questioning which cabinet ministers are involved. The debate becomes heated, with accusations of promoting disinformation.

Speaker 0: We are proud to have penetrated the cabinet. Speaker 1: A constituent asked about outside interference in our democracy. Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum, boasted about infiltrating governments worldwide, including over half of Canada's cabinet. Can the member disclose which cabinet ministers support the WEF agenda for transparency? Speaker 2: Sorry for the poor audio and video quality. I'm unsure if the member...

Speaker 0 introduces Desiree as an outspoken whistleblower who has challenged the Davos elite, asserts that old systems are not fit for the twenty-first century, and asks how Desiree helped build the WEF’s great reset. Speaker 1, Desiree, recounts that in 2020 she obtained her dream job as chief sustainability officer at Deutsche Bank. She states that while in that role she witnessed fraud and describes the annual report as a “legal living document” filled with lies. She says that a couple of weeks after she spoke out, she was fired, and shortly after, the annual report was released with “all the lies.” She describes a subsequent “horrific smear campaign” and notes that within two days, U.S. authorities contacted her, including the SEC, the FBI, and the Department of Justice. She mentions that they asked her questions, implying inquiry or investigation directed at her claims. Speaker 0 questions whether Desiree is advancing the view that “they’re controlling the world.” Speaker 1 asserts that the WEF is vast and that its tentacles affect every part of life. She claims that this situation is not stakeholder capitalism but socialism, accusing the WEF of lying to the public. She contends that the Davos agenda involves more than net zero and asserts that it is connected to a “climate crisis” manufactured by a “multi trillion dollar industrial complex.” She reiterates that the Davos agenda is about more than climate goals and frames it as a broad, powerful economic and political enterprise. Speaker 0 asks Desiree whether she ever met Claus Schwab and whether she has anything to say about the encounter. Speaker 1 responds with a brief affirmative, saying “Yes,” to having met Schwab, and adds “Truthfully” when asked for further remarks about the meeting. Summary of key points: - Desiree’s career move to Deutsche Bank in 2020 as chief sustainability officer and her claim of discovering fraud and a lies-filled annual report. - Her claim of being fired and subjected to a smear campaign, followed by inquiries from U.S. authorities (SEC, FBI, DOJ). - The assertion that the WEF’s influence extends across life, characterizing the Davos agenda as socialism rather than stakeholder capitalism, and alleging a manufactured climate crisis tied to a multi-trillion-dollar industrial complex. - The claim that the Davos agenda encompasses more than net zero and entails broader power and influence. - Desiree confirms she met Claus Schwab, with a brief, candid acknowledgment.

- The speaker found their photo name on the World Economic Forum website under the category “Young Global Leaders,” noting that the list includes people from different political parties worldwide and is described as pushing a super globalist agenda with corporate power among the wealthiest. - It is claimed that even president Putin and others were once “young global leaders,” suggesting the WEF and related networks infiltrate cabinets and governance structures. - The idea is presented that the world oligarchic system holds power in Europe, controlling leaders such as the Bundescanseller (German chancellor) or prime ministers, leading to a perception of a global oligarchy. - The speaker states the Global Shapers community was created as a means to shape the common future, implying an organized effort to influence global policy. - There is a claim that attempts are being made to establish a new world order with rules that supersede and undermine national sovereignty and democracy. - It is argued that UN officials and WEF Davos leaders are in effect the same actors, suggesting the UN is indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum in practice. - The claim is made that these elites claim to know what is best for the people, and that billionaires are driving the agenda, with the danger being that they set the world’s rules and pursue a utopian future while silencing the voices and sovereignty of nations. - A sentiment is expressed that the situation is controlled by the same oligarchic ideas and actors, with the response labeled as “Total. 100%.” - Some participants concede debates about a deglobalizing world, but others argue for reglobalization of the world. - It is asserted that the World Economic Forum creates leaders who are then elected by the public, suggesting a pipeline from WEF to political office. - In the United Nations, there is a description of scrutiny for political correctness; those who are not 100% politically correct cannot participate, and influence can be exerted through salary and offers to control individuals. - There is mention of a global rules-based order aimed at combating dangerous extremist views online and minimizing misinformation, framed within shaping a great reset. - The claim is made that nobody will be safe unless everybody is vaccinated, and that there is a need to confront a deep, systemic, and structural restructuring of the world. - The discussion concludes with the expectation that the world will look different after this transition process.

We are proud of our influence in government. A constituent asked about outside interference in democracy, specifically regarding Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum. He claimed that the WEF has infiltrated over half of Canada's cabinet. In the interest of transparency, could you name the cabinet ministers aligned with the WEF's agenda? Order, please. The question is important, but the audio and video quality are poor. I apologize for that. The younger generation, including Prime Minister Trudeau, is involved.

The member for Oshawa raised concerns about outside interference in democracy by the World Economic Forum. They questioned which Canadian cabinet ministers support the WEF's agenda. The discussion was interrupted due to technical issues. Another member criticized spreading disinformation. A member from Lambton Kent Middlesex thanked a colleague for their speech and asked for more details on the legislation.

The speaker mentions the integration of young leaders in the World Economic Forum and highlights figures like Merkel and Putin who were once young global leaders. They express pride in the current young generation of leaders, such as Trudeau and the President of Argentina. The speaker also mentions their presence in cabinets and refers to a recent reception where many cabinet members were young global leaders. Another speaker acknowledges the same trend in Argentina and France. Later, a member of parliament raises a question about outside interference in democracy and mentions Klaus Schwab's comments about the World Economic Forum infiltrating governments, specifically Canada's cabinet. The audio quality is poor, and the session becomes chaotic with members arguing about disinformation and the need for debate.