reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Former employees acknowledge the significant influence of the pharmaceutical industry on media. They argue that shaping the message allows them to shape the world. They highlight the use of Ivermectin in various countries, including India and Argentina, where it has shown success in treating COVID-19. However, others dismiss its effectiveness and label it as a horse dewormer. The speakers criticize the pharmaceutical industry for manipulating clinical studies and influencing research grants. They also express concerns about censorship and the withholding of information, which they believe misleads the public.

The speaker discusses how CNN portrayed them as taking horse medication, specifically Ivermectin, which is actually a medication used more commonly in humans. They mention that Ivermectin has been prescribed to billions of people and even won a Nobel Prize for its efficacy in humans. The speaker believes that Ivermectin had to be discredited because of a federal law that states emergency use authorization for vaccines cannot be issued if there is an existing medication proven effective against the target illness. They argue that acknowledging the effectiveness of Ivermectin would have jeopardized the multi-billion dollar vaccine industry.

The speaker discusses Ivermectin, a Merck product, and its ingredients, including benzo alcohol, glycols, and polysorbate 80, which is also used in vaccines to help heavy metals cross the blood-brain barrier. Propylene glycol, also found in antifreeze, is another ingredient. The speaker claims parasites accumulate due to heavy metal pollution, and while Ivermectin may kill the worms, it doesn't address the underlying heavy metal issue. The speaker alleges the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has rights to Ivermectin pills. The speaker suggests using natural foods like pumpkin seeds, papaya seeds, beets, carrots, and dragon's blood to remove heavy metals from the body instead of funding big pharma.

The speaker discusses a CNN segment where they portrayed him as taking horse medication. He criticizes the repeated claims and believes it shows a conspiracy. He clarifies that the medication, Ivermectin, is commonly used in humans and has even won a Nobel Prize for its efficacy. The speaker suggests that Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were discredited to protect the vaccine industry, as federal law prohibits emergency use authorization if there is an existing effective medication. Acknowledging the effectiveness of these medications would have jeopardized the multi-billion dollar vaccine enterprise.

The speaker discusses a CNN segment where they portrayed him as taking horse medication. He believes this is evidence of a conspiracy, as the medication in question, Ivermectin, is commonly used in humans and has even won a Nobel Prize for its efficacy. He suggests that Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were discredited to protect the vaccine industry, as federal law prohibits emergency use authorization for vaccines if there are existing effective medications. Acknowledging the effectiveness of these medications would have undermined the multi-billion dollar vaccine industry.

The FDA now approves the use of Ivermectin for COVID treatment, which surprises the speaker. They discuss their previous conversations about finding alternative treatments for COVID and express frustration with the FDA's actions. They believe that many lives could have been saved if Ivermectin had been widely available. They mention the importance of truth and courageous reporting to counter the mainstream media's narrative. The speaker warns about the dangerous path the country is heading towards, with an elite group seeking control over people's lives. They highlight government expansion, WHO amendments, and the need for people to wake up to the current dangers.

The speaker argues that ivermectin is part of a “diabolical plan” attributed to the Rockefeller organization. They claim the plan was organized in 2010 and that the Rockefellers “knew that people aren’t going to take vaccines after 2020,” so “they’ll take a different pharmaceutical product.” They contrast this with the claim that ivermectin is “safe,” saying that looking at reported side effects—including blindness, liver failure, infertility, and “all types of horrible things”—raises the question of how it could be safe. They also say that when people claim they purchased ivermectin from a different country, this does not matter because “Rockefellers, their medical system, they own the entire medical system across the world.” The speaker describes this as a “quite a plan,” and connects it to the “alternative health push,” stating that on platforms like Rumble there are ads for ivermectin and that marketing pharmaceuticals on an alternative health platform is used as a reason to “wonder” why it is being promoted. The speaker further claims that alternative health discussions about “parasites” are actually “just heavy metal overload,” and that ivermectin “has heavy metals inside of it.” They state that people interpret symptom improvement from ivermectin as proof it “fixed” them, and they frame this as similar to antibiotics that suppress symptoms. They then describe a broader industry framing: they say alternative health promotions and podcasts helped grow ivermectin into “a 32 billion dollar industry.” They also assert that the companies producing ivermectin include the same major pharmaceutical corporations said to make vaccines in 2020. The speaker says that when they looked up who makes ivermectin, they found Merck, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, and Bayer, and they argue this shows that “the pharmaceutical companies who are making the vaccines in 2020 are the same ones making the ivermectin,” calling it a “bait and switch.” The speaker characterizes the overall strategy as one in which Rockefellers allegedly assume people will not put a vaccine in their body, yet “will still put pharmaceuticals into your body.” They also reference ingredients they claim to have found in ivermectin formulations, including polysorbate 80 “which… breaks down the whole blood brain barrier,” GMO cornstarch, maltodextrin, artificial flavors, hexane, and glycols, describing them as “petroleum based things.” Finally, they dispute the argument that ivermectin “came from nature,” saying it “came from a golf course in Japan,” and stating that golf courses are sprayed with pesticides, so the substance was “toxic” and was then “resold… to the people as it came from nature.”

Someone said Matt loves to rip into fenben and ivermectin. The speaker argues that these are pharmaceutical drugs being put into the body and claims that ivermectin and fenben represent “the whole entire pharmaceutical industry,” tying it to companies like Merck, which they call a vaccine company. They say that using ivermectin and fenben may “fix” someone by suppressing symptoms rather than addressing the underlying problem, and they claim that months and years later people become “poisoned” and develop significant issues. The speaker describes repeated accounts from “hundreds of messages” from people who say they felt great after using ivermectin and fenben but later reported new symptoms, including lumps all over the body. They claim these lumps are side effects from the pills, saying that instead of breaking down a tumor, the tumor spread throughout the body and began appearing as small lumps or growths coming out through the skin. The speaker attributes this to failing to “get to the root cause,” stating that the root cause is “heavy metals and toxicities and poisons” being introduced into the body, which they say leads the body to react and worsens outcomes. They also claim the speaker’s page receives “big pharma bots” that spam similar promoted content, encouraging people to buy products. The speaker questions the idea that if the products were truly life-saving and fixing everyone, the medical system would not be needed because everyone would be fixed. They further claim that these products make billions of dollars and add that one source they mention is a “toxic golf course” sprayed with glyphosate.

The speaker discusses a CNN segment where they portrayed him as taking horse medication. He believes this is evidence of a conspiracy, as the medication in question, Ivermectin, is commonly used in humans and has even won a Nobel Prize for its efficacy. The speaker suggests that Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were discredited to protect the vaccine industry, as federal law prohibits emergency use authorization for vaccines if there are existing effective medications. Acknowledging the effectiveness of these medications would have undermined the multi-billion dollar vaccine industry.

The discussion centers on a federal law allegedly affecting Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for vaccines. The claim is that a little-known federal law says you cannot give an EUA to a vaccine if there is no medication that has been approved for any purpose and is shown effective against the target disease. The speaker argues that if Tony Fauci or anyone had admitted that hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin were effective against COVID, it would have been illegal for them to give EUA to the vaccines. The speaker further claims that under that scenario, they would have been unable to get the vaccines approved, and that the vaccine rollout would have collapsed into what is described as “a two hundred billion enterprise” that would have fallen apart. The speaker describes this as something they found “fascinating,” stating that they had been covering the topic for “all of the two years” and that this was “the first I’ve heard” of the idea, saying it was “in your book.” The speaker continues by stating that Tony Fauci would not have obtained EUA for the vaccine if the medical community had been saying that ivermectin works and is an effective treatment for COVID. The transcript then asserts that many doctors were in fact saying ivermectin works, describing “seventeen thousand doctors” who supposedly signed a petition and noting “so many peer-reviewed publications” that “consistently say” it. Despite that, the speaker says Fauci “had to aggressively crusade against it” to “drown out those reports,” and lists specific criticisms Fauci allegedly made, including that it was a “horse medication,” that it was dangerous, that people were taking it, and that overdosing was occurring. A question is raised about why Fauci kept saying it after he got authorization. The response offers two main points. First, the speaker claims that even if there is an EUA, “the law appears to say you can’t have it anymore if there’s a functioning medication.” Second, the speaker suggests there may be a “very, very strong incentive” for Fauci to “kill ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine,” without claiming direct inner thoughts beyond describing it as speculation. The transcript names several doctors and claims they consistently say—based on their experience treating COVID patients—that ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are effective. It references Harvey Risch (described as a leading biostatistician and epidemiologist at Yale), Peter McCullough (described as “the most published doctor in the history of the world in his specialty”), and Pierre Corey, stating that these doctors have treated “tens of thousands of COVID patients successfully.” The speaker concludes with the claim that “Half a million Americans didn’t need to die.”

Ivermectin was initially demonized during COVID, but now it's being recognized as safe and effective by the clinical community. Many clinicians were using it successfully, despite the initial fear surrounding it. The speaker's doctor used it on her family and patients with positive results. The speaker believes it's important to report on this now, even though they were initially hesitant due to conflicting information. It's crucial to question and reevaluate beliefs, even if they were previously in favor of vaccines.

Some people are refusing the COVID vaccine and instead taking horse dewormer, which has no evidence of effectiveness and can be dangerous. The speaker got COVID and tried various medications, including Ivermectin, which is commonly used for deworming horses. The mention of Ivermectin as a horse dewormer is not flattering. The speaker believes there is clear evidence that Ivermectin can be effective and that people should be informed about it.

Ivermectin, once considered a conspiracy theory, is now reportedly curing diseases like cancer, diabetes, MS, and Parkinson's by addressing parasites. The speaker prefers the dura mectin version, a white paste, over the ivermectin yellow gel. According to the speaker, no one has ever died from ivermectin overdose, unlike aspirin and acetaminophen. Ivermectin won a Nobel Prize in 2015 for its effectiveness against diseases like malaria. Positive effects were seen for COVID, but its use was discouraged to maintain the emergency declaration. The speaker takes a full capsule of ivermectin daily for two weeks, followed by a week off, as a prophylactic. They wash it down with a sweat tonic containing quinine, which is hydrochloroquine. Hydrochloroquine and ivermectin were allegedly dismissed by organizations like the WHO, despite being effective. Links to more information are provided in the comments.

The discussion centers on ivermectin and various claims about its origins, promotion, and effects. One speaker asserts that ivermectin is made by big pharma, specifically naming Merck and vaccine companies, and that people are using it because influencers told the public to take pharmaceutical pills after the pandemic, while not disclosing that cell phone towers are in front of their houses. The speaker claims that people took ivermectin instead, and states that ivermectin is linked to liver toxicity, jaundice, brain damage, and infertility, suggesting these risks are part of a broader strategy to reduce fertility in the population. The other speaker counters by describing ivermectin as having productive toxicity, noting this is observed in animal studies, including rabbits and other mammals, and rejecting the idea that its toxicity is limited to arthropods like crabs or cockroaches. This speaker claims it is a well-proven reproductive toxic substance for many mammals. They reference another video discussing the neurotoxic effect of ivermectin and mention that veterinarians discuss routine use and continued use of ivermectin, associating it with various adverse outcomes.

The video discusses the controversy surrounding the use of Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. While some claim it is a safe and effective medicine, others argue that it is a horse dewormer with no clinical evidence of its efficacy. The video highlights the smear campaign against Ivermectin and suggests that powerful forces, including pharmaceutical companies, may be suppressing its use. It also mentions the positive results seen in countries like India and Peru where Ivermectin was used as part of a multi-drug approach. The video raises concerns about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on the media and the manipulation of clinical studies. Overall, it presents Ivermectin as a potentially effective treatment that has been unfairly maligned.

Speaker claims ivermectin is part of a diabolical Rockefeller plan devised in 2010, predicting people would reject vaccines after 2020 and turn to another pharmaceutical. They question ivermectin’s safety by listing side effects such as blindness, liver failure, and infertility. They argue the Rockefellers own the entire medical system worldwide, so buying from a different country is ineffective. The discussion notes ads for pharmaceuticals on alternative-health platforms, suggesting a marketing push. They say parasites are really heavy metals in the body, and that ivermectin contains heavy metals. The claim is that ivermectin, like antibiotics, suppresses symptoms. They describe a $32,000,000,000 industry fueled by this narrative, and when they researched producers, they found Merck, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, and Bayer. The same companies making vaccines in 2020 allegedly also make ivermectin, framing it as a bait-and-switch.

I'm excited about the recent bill in Arkansas aiming to make ivermectin an over-the-counter medication; all states should follow suit. Ivermectin, despite being an antiviral, antimicrobial, and anti-parasitic medicine, was villainized during COVID. When I contracted COVID in 2020, I decided against the under-researched options and tried ivermectin. My symptoms vanished within 24 hours. Ivermectin's benefits extend beyond COVID. I know three people who had stage four cancer that were cured after taking ivermectin. It is strange that effective treatments are often suppressed due to profit motives. The medical industry wants to keep you sick. Get ivermectin now from a reliable US-based source like All Family Pharma before it becomes more expensive and harder to find. You never know when you might need it.

The speaker claims both vaccines and ivermectin fund big pharma, starting with a "graphene oxide rabbit hole" from 2015. Manufacturers of both include Bayer, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Merck, Pfizer, and Johnson and Johnson. The speaker alleges ivermectin and injections share ingredients that break down the blood-brain barrier. The Rockefeller Foundation, funded by the Rothschilds, owns the entire medical system, according to a document removed from Google and research by Eustace Mullins. For "parasites," which are supposedly heavy metal overloads, the speaker suggests alternatives like dragon's blood, pumpkin seeds, papaya seeds, fasting, borax, baking soda, turpentine, chili shots, cilantro, wormwood, or black walnut to remove heavy metals instead of funding big pharma. The speaker believes that funding big pharma perpetuates a harmful cycle.

The speaker discusses Ivermectin, a Merck product, and its ingredients, including benzyl alcohol, glycols, and polysorbate 80, which is also used in vaccines to help heavy metals cross the blood-brain barrier. Propylene glycol, also found in antifreeze, is another ingredient. The speaker claims parasites accumulate due to heavy metal pollution, and while Ivermectin may kill the worms, it doesn't address the underlying heavy metal issue. The speaker states that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has rights to these pills. The speaker suggests using natural foods like pumpkin seeds, papaya seeds, beets, carrots, and dragon's blood to remove heavy metals from the body instead of funding Big Pharma.

The speaker expresses frustration with CNN for portraying them as taking horse medication and conspiring against them. They argue that the medication, ivermectin, is commonly used by humans and has even won a Nobel Prize for its efficacy in humans. They believe that there is a deliberate effort to discredit ivermectin and other medications like hydroxychloroquine to ensure the success of the vaccine industry, which is worth billions of dollars.

Speaker 1 claims ivermectin is made by “big pharma,” specifically that it is made by Merck and “the vaccine companies.” They say people who promote ivermectin are “taking a vaccine product,” and then using it in a way that encourages others to take pharmaceutical pills during and after the pandemic. Speaker 1 describes that they “got a whole bunch of influencers on board to tell people to take pharmaceutical pills after the pandemic and during the pandemic,” and that this is done “without showing them that their cell phone tower is in front of their house,” after which people “have gone and take ivermectin instead.” Speaker 1 further states that ivermectin is “linked to liver toxicity,” listing “jaundice, brain damage, whole bunch of infertility, all that stuff.” They add that “that’s why they push it,” and that “anytime that they can make the population infertile, kinda goes hand in hand.” Speaker 0 responds by asserting that ivermectin has “productive toxicity” and that this is seen “in many different animal studies, rabbit studies, and other mammal studies.” Speaker 0 says the idea that ivermectin is “only toxic to arthropods, crabs, et cetera, cockroaches, is not true.” They say it is “a well-proven and well-known reproductive toxic substance” to “many different kinds of mammals.” Speaker 0 then mentions “the next one is another video on the neurotoxic effect of ivermectin,” and says they “know vets who talk about the routine use of ivermectin and the continual use of ivermectin resulting in all sorts of” effects.

The speaker discusses the vaccine and IV mectin, claiming both fund big pharma. They allege a connection to a "graphene oxide rabbit hole" dating back to 2015. Manufacturers like Bayer, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Merck, Pfizer, and Johnson & Johnson are mentioned. The speaker claims IV mectin and injections share the same ingredients, which allegedly break down the blood-brain barrier. They state the Rockefeller Foundation, funded by the Rothschilds, owns the entire medical system, referencing a document removed from Google and a book by Eustace Mullins. The speaker suggests that parasites are actually heavy metal overloads and recommends solutions like dragon's blood, pumpkin seeds, papaya seeds, fasting, borax, baking soda, turpentine, chili shots, cilantro, wormwood, or black walnut to remove heavy metals instead of funding big pharma.

The speakers discuss the exposure of mainstream media and how it tries to dismiss and discredit them. They mention the framing of Ivermectin as horse medicine and find it amusing. They clarify that they took Ivermectin based on the judgment of a medical professional and list other medications they used for COVID treatment. They mention that 200 congresspeople have also been treated with Ivermectin. They speculate that the demonization of Ivermectin may be motivated by financial interests since it is a generic drug. The video ends with the information that Ivermectin costs around 30¢ per dose.

The video discusses the controversy surrounding the use of Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. While some claim it is a safe and effective medicine, others argue that it is a horse dewormer with no clinical evidence of its efficacy. The video highlights the experiences of doctors who have faced backlash for advocating for Ivermectin and suggests that powerful forces, including pharmaceutical companies, may be suppressing its use. It also mentions studies and success stories from countries like Peru, India, and Japan where Ivermectin has been used effectively. The video raises concerns about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on media and academic research. Overall, it presents Ivermectin as a potentially valuable treatment option that has been unfairly maligned.

The speaker discusses a CNN segment where they portrayed him as taking horse medication. He argues that this portrayal is a clear indication of a conspiracy, as the medication in question, Ivermectin, is commonly used in humans and has even won a Nobel Prize for its efficacy in humans. The speaker believes that Ivermectin had to be discredited in order to promote the COVID-19 vaccines, as federal law prohibits emergency use authorization for vaccines if there is an existing effective medication. Acknowledging Ivermectin's effectiveness would have jeopardized the multi-billion dollar vaccine industry.