TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Three years after January 6, questions persist about whether the day was a setup. Congressman Clay Higgins pressed FBI Director Chris Wray about confidential human sources; Wray declined to reveal specifics. Higgins says, 'we do have a great deal of evidence compiled' showing 'deep state actors within the federal government to set the stage for what happened in J4,5,6' and that 'FBI assets dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol prior to the doors being opened' with 'well over 200' assets in the crowd, outside and inside guiding entry. He argues the operation aimed to 'destroy the entire mega movement' and to entrap Americans, linking it to a 'compromised election cycle' in 2020. He notes that 'some Republicans cheered the murder of Ashley Babbitt.' He calls for unredacted 'digital files from J4,5,6' to be released to the public, proposing to crowdsource '80,000 hours' of evidence and pursue criminal referrals.

"The January 6 stuff was a culmination of what started many years ago back when Obama was in office." "There were some near the top who knew something was coming, and they prepped for it." "They were going to eliminate Pence." "There were agents out there. There were phony FBI out there. There was phony Secret Service, and there was phony US marshals." "There were people in place for months planning this, and there were there was help from certain intelligence agents and assets in this country, but there was also a foreign country, a couple of them helped." "One of them what we all like for Thanksgiving, yeah, Turkey." "They had people in their intelligence agency over there, MIT." "They were over here to help as well." "So why not come over here and help somebody else who is disloyal to his country and his president?"

- "The January 6 stuff was a culmination of what started many years ago back when Obama was in office." - "They decided to use it for their own self interest." - "There were a few at the very top, both sides, who knew exactly what was coming and tried to add to it." - "Yeah. And it was a coup." - "They were going to eliminate Pence." - "There were phony FBI out there." - "There were phony Secret Service, and there was phony US marshals." - "So the original plan was to take over the sledblade, and the marshals had to come in." - "That's why he was phoning marshals out there."

BuzzFeed has just confirmed that the FBI had a, quote, “hand in nearly every aspect of the alleged plot, starting with its inception. In other words, the FBI helped plan it.” An FBI informant organized meetings to kidnap the governor. Another informant, quote, prodded the alleged mastermind of the kidnapping plot to advance his plan. And text from an FBI agent directed an informant to draw people into the conspiracy. In the end, it looks like there were more FBI snitches, informants, people working with the FBI involved in the plot than weren't. It was an FBI plot. So what does this suggest about January 6? We know there were FBI informants in the crowd. We know that for certain. Why can't we know their involvement in January 6 now that we're getting a sense of their involvement in this fake kidnapping plot? Julie Kelly of American Greatness discussed the Lansing April 2020 protest mirroring January 6, with militia groups in military gear, police stood down, firearms, and viral photographs. She cited the plausibility of FBI infiltration before January 6 and Revolver News Darren Beatty's article. The discussion called for leaders to question Christopher Wray.

Three years after January 6, Rep. Clay Higgins says questions about a setup and that evidence "points to luring Americans to Washington into a trap." He cites a Homeland Security hearing clip: "Did the FBI have confidential human sources embedded within the January 6 protesters...?" Higgins asserts: "there were FBI assets dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol on January 6 prior to the doors being opened" and that "they waved those guys in." He says "a faction within the FBI and within our intelligence services" coordinated with "the most extreme liberal factions within a Democrat party" and that there were "well over 200" FBI assets. He calls for releasing "the j four, five, and six" "unredacted digital files" so the public can review "eighty thousand hours of digital evidence" and promises "criminal referrals." He closes: "Free speech is bigger than any one person or any one organization."

Two things are highlighted: a serious look at charging documents for militia groups, and the Michigan infiltration episode, described as the 'kidnapping plot' and a 'plot to storm the Michigan state capitol'—seen as a dry run for a later action by the same groups. It says no one else mentioned this Michigan event in understanding what may have happened on January 6 until Revolver News, and that this was the thrust of the initial report that opened up the entire Pandora's box. The other speaker adds that this was not covered by the press, calling it potential clickbait about 'a conspiracy plot by our federal government to be involved in a kidnapping operation of a governor,' noting that 'the head of that operation is now in that position here in Washington, D. C. overseeing this January 6 investigation.'

Governor, the Virginia National Guard has been called in, but federal approval is needed for jurisdiction. There are reports of violence and chaos, allegedly instigated by the president. We discovered a previously missing interview where it was noted that Trump offered 10,000 troops for assistance on January 6. Evidence shows that when the Capitol was attacked, Trump’s immediate response was to contact Pelosi and Milley for help. However, it was Pelosi and Bowser who declined the National Guard's assistance. This situation raises concerns about potential cover-ups following January 6, and it’s crucial to uncover the truth, regardless of party affiliations. We will pursue the evidence wherever it leads.

We had full cooperation from the Capitol Police and the speaker's office, but we couldn't show that FBI agents were present in the crowd, which the FBI has admitted. Ray Epps was not a civilian; he encouraged violence, yet the January 6th committee defended him. There were clear signs of federal involvement, like individuals with earpieces breaking things and then fleeing. I didn't want to wrongly label anyone as an agent without proof. The recent Proud Boys trial revealed an FBI agent lied and hid evidence. We need crowdsourcing for the footage, which should be public. The narrative around January 6th has been misrepresented; it was a violent political demonstration, not a deadly insurrection. Intelligence about the event was withheld from Capitol Police, suggesting a deliberate attempt to create chaos for political gain.

The United States military, including Secretary of Defense Miller and General Milley, discussed locking down Washington DC due to concerns of violence at the Capitol on January 6th. They considered revoking permits for demonstrations on Capitol Hill. However, I, the one who issues these permits, was not informed. Instead, on January 4th, Miller restricted the National Guard from carrying any weapons or civil disobedience equipment that could be used during the anticipated demonstrations or violence. This decision seems contradictory, as the military expressed concern about potential violence while limiting the National Guard's ability to respond aggressively.

I was going to discuss the January 6 hostages, but there's a lot of action coming on that front. Today, Joe issued pardons for individuals guilty of serious crimes, and the unselect committee has destroyed much of the evidence, including hearings. They deleted information about Nancy Pelosi rejecting an offer of 10,000 soldiers for security. Even 500 could have made a difference that day, despite the large crowd. There are many great photos from that day that aren't shown, focusing instead on the Capitol. I intended to address this, but was advised to wait until tomorrow. I decided to bring it up now.

We had full cooperation from the Capitol Police and the speaker's office, but we couldn't show that FBI agents were in the crowd, which they admitted. Ray Epps was not just a civilian; he encouraged violence and was defended by the January 6th committee. There were clear signs of federal involvement, but I didn't want to wrongly accuse anyone without proof. Recent trials revealed FBI misconduct, including hiding evidence. We need to crowdsource the footage from January 6th, as it belongs to the public. The narrative of a violent insurrection is misleading; it was a political demonstration among many that year. Intelligence about the event was withheld from Capitol Police, suggesting a motive to create a politically damaging situation.

Steve D'Antwono, the FBI director, received multiple emails warning about the violence expected at the Capitol before January 6th, but nothing was mentioned during a video call with him. The military had discussed locking down Washington DC and revoking permits on Capitol Hill due to concerns about violence. However, on January 4th, the acting secretary of defense issued a memo restricting the National Guard from carrying weapons or equipment for crowd control. This decision hindered the National Guard's response when assistance was desperately needed on January 6th. Governor Hogan even pleaded for help but was denied due to the memo. The situation doesn't make sense.

Speaker 0: Some Republicans argue that Nancy Pelosi staged January 6 and the select committee covered it up. Based on what you know, what are the verifiable events in the lead ups? Speaker 1: I was DoD chief of staff on January 6. We deployed National Guard; in the Oval Office the president, president Trump at the time, authorized pursuant to law up to 10 to 20,000 National Guard. We took that authorization because the law's second part required a request from who? Nancy Pelosi and the Metropolitan Police and the mayor at the time. And what did they say? No. And remember what happened for the next two years? They say, Oh, Kash is lying. Trump’s lying. And what do we find? Letters of their declination of the National Guard refusing to have the National Guard show up. Nancy Pelosi and her team were busy filming a movie on January 6 while this so caused chaos around her was going down. If she had just look at it this way. If she had said yes to the National Guard and we had 10,000 uniformed military officers establish a secure perimeter, do you think January 6 would have gone differently? Speaker 0: It is intriguing that 02/1950 FBI plain clothed agents were inside the Capitol on January 6. Speaker 1: This is a great example of the president's initiative to solve all the answers on January 6, and it's another example of our transparency efforts. Pursuant to the president, we investigated the matter and found out why FBI agents were placed there in the first place. And it turns out, we found documentation and witnesses and whistleblowers that said we were forced to go there to do riot control. Armstrong, do you know what the FBI does not do ever? Riot control. Speaker 0: And you believe them? That's their word, not mine.

Town halls are meant for voters, not the press or the moderator. The speaker criticizes Caitlyn for interjecting her own views. They mention spending a significant amount of time discussing January 6th and their involvement in the oversight committee. They state that Donald Trump authorized national guard troops on January 4 and followed up on January 5. They claim that everyone testified in the oversight committee except the Capitol Police, which Nancy Pelosi allegedly prevented.

The denial of the request for national guardsmen on January 6th remains a pivotal moment. The person responsible for that decision is known, but the reason behind it is still unknown. There has been no answer to that question. Additionally, Representative Bennie Thompson stated that Speaker Pelosi was off limits and her records would not be obtained by the J6 committee. However, she was in charge of the House that day. It is important to uncover the truth and understand what truly happened. Otherwise, it seems absurd, like a scene from a play.

That incident happened on the Capitol Steps in front of a Capitol police officer. He was engaged in sexually threatening aggressive behavior in front on the Capitol Steps, and he wasn't even asked to step back. This officer was just cool with it. There was footage of Capitol Police officers helping and being sympathetic to the insurrectionists on January 6, and everyone decided it was too politically difficult to deal with, brushing it under the rug. To this day, there has never been an investigation into that. Never. As a result, we have no idea which officers are safe around, and whether those with massive weapons were with that crowd or not. If you raise questions about that, it's construed as attacking the entire institution of public safety. Riddle me that. We saw that in the State of the Union too, with both parties shoveling money in without accountability.

Senator Tom Tillis cited January 6 as his reason for blocking Ed Martin, which is suspicious because January 6 was a "Fedsurrection" that happened over four years ago, and peaceful protesters have been pardoned. Tillis mentioned apprehension about Martin pursuing a "Fedsurrection" theory, claiming there was no federal involvement. This is curious because North Carolina, Tillis's state, is the heart of the Mark Milley deep state and has a history of domestic interference. North Carolina played an extraordinary role in January 6 itself. Fort Bragg, the special operations and psychological operations center, is located there, and organizing protest activity has been a hotbed for 60 years. North Carolina was the center of the "Fed's erection" logistics for January 6. The Thomas Caldwell complaint details how the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and Three Percenters met in North Carolina days before January 6. The FBI and Justice Department allowed a "quick reaction force" to transport weapons and explosives. This person, "person three," was never charged, despite playing a key role in the Oath Keepers' indictment. Mark Milley told Gina Haspel in November 2020 that there was a right-wing coup afoot, suggesting infiltration of these groups in North Carolina.

Three years after January 6, the speaker questions whether federal agencies played a role in staging the events. In a 2022 Homeland Security hearing, Congressman Clay Higgins asked: 'Did the FBI have confidential human sources embedded within the January 6 protesters and dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol prior to the doors being opened?' The FBI director said such claims are 'categorically false.' Higgins says evidence suggests 'deep state actors within the federal government' lured Americans to Washington and 'set the stage for j four, five, and six'—with 'well over 200' FBI assets in the crowd and inside the Capitol who 'led' protesters inside. He argues the objective was to 'destroy the entire mega movement' and to keep Trump out of office. He calls for releasing unredacted 'digital files from j four, five, and six' and cites those who 'cheered the murder of Ashley Babbitt.'

An individual provided video footage purportedly showing two federal agents attacking the Capitol on January 6th. A defense attorney for the Oath Keepers filed a motion identifying 80 "suspicious actors" and "material witnesses" present at the Capitol on January 6th who have not been arrested or charged. These individuals were concentrated in areas where trouble occurred, including the East Side and the Columbus doors. The attorney alleges some worked in tactical two-man teams and were later seen on the terrace. He seeks to identify them using facial recognition and questions if the events were staged. A radio journalist captured footage of two individuals he believed to be government agents. One was encouraging people to enter the Capitol after a window had been broken, even pulling out a pane of glass himself. When he realized he was being filmed, he blamed a protester and shoved him. The other individual was holding open the Columbus doors with a wooden pole and pushing people inside. The journalist who shot the video said the man shoved him. One person claims that the FBI, not Trump supporters, led the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6th.

On January 6th, the speaker explains that the riot was incited by the feds because they wanted to prevent the debate and adjudication of the election in the Senate. They wanted to take away Trump's presidency and destroy the executive branch. Steve Bannon refused to testify to the committee because of executive privilege, which legally prevented him from sharing his conversations with Trump. The speaker believes that Obama's ego is controlling things behind the scenes, and Joe Biden is not the best person to run the government. The riot disrupted the planned debate, and Pence was never asked to overturn the election, just to send it back to the states for further review.

The speaker claims that the real faces of J6 are leftist Democrats who are against Donald Trump, regardless of the legitimacy of the election. According to an investigation by Milly Weaver, these individuals orchestrated the insurrection, fooling people into believing it was perpetrated by MAGA supporters. Evidence purportedly shows they are the real violent insurrectionists behind J6. One individual is quoted discussing putting pressure on the Democratic National Committee, suggesting taking over buildings, using disguises, and asserting that burning buildings are legitimate forms of resistance. They also discuss a campaign to get Democratic governors to refuse to deploy the National Guard. One speaker states they were in the front and orchestrated it, while also expressing support for Trump 2024.

New information is emerging about January 6th. A new article will reveal that General Mark Milley, during the Trump administration in June 2020, authorized the use of heat and sound directed energy weapons against protesters in Washington, D.C. We have photographic evidence to support this claim, and the article will be released tomorrow, leading to further discussions about January 6th. The sound energy weapons can be set to either super audible, which deters crowds, or sub audible, which can incite chaos and violence, referred to as agitation weapons. This raises concerns about the government's role in events like January 6th, suggesting potential entrapment of citizens by their own agencies.

We had cooperation from the Capitol Police and the speaker's office, but we couldn't show that FBI agents were in the crowd, which they admitted. Ray Epps was not just a civilian; he encouraged violence, yet the January 6th committee defended him. There were clear signs of federal involvement, but I didn't want to wrongly accuse anyone. The recent Proud Boys trial revealed an FBI agent lied and hid evidence, raising questions about their role. We need to crowdsource the footage, as it's publicly owned. The claims about January 6th being a violent insurrection are misleading; it was a political demonstration among many that year. Intelligence about potential violence was withheld from Capitol Police, suggesting a deliberate attempt to create chaos and discredit a political party.

Patriots, if you think you know the full story of January 6, think again, due to 'absolute dereliction of duty of the media in this country.' Darren Beatty of Revolver News says they reported in June that 'federal operatives... provided foreknowledge' and that there were 'federal informants participating in the rally and communicating that day with federal law enforcement.' The New York Times later noted that 'law enforcement had far greater visibility,' which Beatty calls 'a PR operation' to precede 'more damning revelations ahead,' predicting 'many, many informants scattered throughout the various militia groups imputed to one six.' He asks, 'if they had informants... why didn't they do anything to stop it?' He cites Michigan Whitmer, noting 'the head of the Detroit FBI field office' who ran that operation 'was promoted to lead the investigation into one six,' and mentions 'Stuart Rhodes' of the Oath Keepers, who 'has not been indicted' and that 'the feds took a single cell phone from him four months after One Six.'

The United States military, including Secretary of Defense Miller and General Milley, discussed locking down Washington DC due to concerns of violence at the Capitol on January 6th. They considered revoking permits for demonstrations on Capitol Hill. However, I, the one who issues these permits, was not informed. Instead, on January 4th, Miller restricted the National Guard from carrying any weapons or civil disobedience equipment, which doesn't make sense. So, the military expresses worry about potential violence but simultaneously limits the National Guard's ability to take an aggressive stance.