reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Megan Kelly reports breaking news from a federal courthouse in New York, where Shawn Combmes has been found not guilty on most charges, guilty only of two counts related to transportation to engage in prostitution. The prosecution faces a significant defeat as the jury acquitted him of serious charges, including racketeering and sex trafficking, which carried minimum sentences of 15 years. Evidence against Combmes included receipts and testimonies from escorts, indicating he paid for their services. The jury appeared to accept the defense's argument that the women had agency and were not coerced, despite evidence of threats and violence. The potential sentencing for Combmes could range from 21 to 27 months, but enhancements for coercion may apply. His defense team is seeking his release pending sentencing, arguing he poses no flight risk. Legal experts discuss the implications of the verdict, emphasizing the difficulty of proving coercion beyond a reasonable doubt. The judge's decision on bail is pending, with considerations of public safety and the nature of the convictions weighing heavily. The courtroom atmosphere shifted dramatically as Combmes celebrated the verdict, while the legal community reflects on the broader implications for victims and the justice system.

The Murdoch double murder trial concluded with Alec Murdoch found guilty on all counts, including two counts of murder and related weapons charges. He was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. During the trial, Murdoch maintained his innocence, but the case captivated the nation due to its exploration of human nature and the shocking transformation of a respected attorney into a murderer. The prosecution's case was bolstered by a videotape taken by Murdoch's son shortly before the murders, which contradicted Murdoch's claims of being elsewhere. The discussion highlighted the gripping nature of the trial, with witnesses expressing disbelief over Murdoch's dual life as a family man and a criminal. The panel, including legal experts, analyzed the implications of the verdict and the potential for an appeal, noting that the defense might argue against the circumstantial evidence presented. The jurors' deliberations were swift, influenced significantly by the videotape evidence. The conversation also touched on the emotional toll of the trial, particularly for Judge Clifton Newman, who had recently lost his own son. The panelists speculated on Murdoch's future in prison and the psychological impact of his life sentence. They discussed the broader implications of the case, including the potential for appeals based on the introduction of prior bad acts and the challenges of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in circumstantial cases. In a separate segment, the panel shifted focus to the upcoming defamation trial against Fox News by Dominion Voting Systems. The case centers on allegations that Fox knowingly aired false claims about Dominion's involvement in election fraud. Legal experts debated the merits of Dominion's case, the challenges of proving actual malice, and the implications for First Amendment protections in journalism. They discussed the potential for the trial to reshape media accountability and the standards for defamation, emphasizing the complexities of the legal arguments involved. Overall, the discussions underscored the intertwining of legal proceedings with societal reflections on morality, accountability, and the responsibilities of media in reporting contentious issues.

Megyn Kelly discusses the latest developments in the high-profile murder trial of Alec Murdoch, who is accused of killing his wife and son on June 7, 2021. The prosecution argues that Murdoch, a former prosecutor facing financial ruin due to embezzlement and lawsuits, murdered his family to gain sympathy and deflect attention from his financial crimes. Testimony revealed that Murdoch initially lied about his whereabouts during the murders, claiming he was napping at home instead of being at the kennels where the murders occurred. A Snapchat video captured just before the murders confirmed his presence at the scene, prompting him to change his story on the stand. Kelly interviews trial lawyers Mark Geragos and Ronnie Richter, who analyze Murdoch's decision to testify. Geragos expresses skepticism about the defense's strategy, suggesting that Murdoch had little to lose given his dire situation. Richter critiques the prosecution's cross-examination techniques, noting that they allowed Murdoch to evade direct questions and present a sympathetic narrative. Both lawyers highlight the emotional impact of Murdoch's testimony on the jury, with reports of jurors crying during his statements. The discussion also touches on Murdoch's shifting accounts regarding his financial crimes and his attempts to downplay confrontations with his law firm. The lawyers emphasize the importance of credibility in the trial, suggesting that Murdoch's admissions about his financial misdeeds could undermine his defense against the murder charges. They express concern that the prosecution has not effectively challenged Murdoch's narrative, allowing him to connect with the jury. As the trial continues, Kelly and her guests anticipate further developments, including the potential for a verdict. The conversation underscores the complexities of the case, the strategies employed by both sides, and the emotional weight of the testimony presented in court.

An online romance, a Ouija board, and a homicide that rattled Spokane. On August 13, 2020, 911 captured a panicked call from Haley as a man lay mortally wounded in a bedroom and another man lay naked and bleeding nearby. Investigators would later learn that Haley, her husband Anthony, and her online boyfriend, Eddie Martinez, invited Eddie into their home with the aim of summoning a demon. A chaotic sequence followed: Anthony was stabbed multiple times, Haley survived in a blood-soaked robe, and Eddie fled the scene before police arrived. The trio’s tangled relationship and alleged demonic occult elements framed the ensuing investigation. Police later connected the dots through body cam footage, 911 transcripts, and Eddie’s interrogation. Sacramento investigators traced Eddie from California to Spokane after the murder, and he was arrested without incident. In a lengthy interview, Eddie described premeditation that began inside the bedroom, claiming a surge of anger during a sexual encounter that led him to grab a four-inch folding knife from the living room mantle. Haley’s statements at the crime scene painted a different picture, with conflicting accounts about consent and involvement. The recovered knife, blood evidence, and the couple’s fractured dynamics formed the core of the officers’ pursuit of the truth. Jurors would later convict Eddie Martinez of first-degree premeditated murder, sentencing him to 27 years in prison after a trial in April 2023. The defense pressed questions about consent and provocation, but the verdict stood, and an appeal filed in 2025 upheld the conviction and sentence. The case highlighted a volatile mix of online romance, nontraditional relationship dynamics, and a belief in occult influence as factors in a brutal crime. It remains one of Spokane’s most publicized true-crime investigations, with authorities emphasizing the need to scrutinize complex domestic arrangements when violence erupts.

Welcome to the Megyn Kelly Show. Today, we discuss the tragic case of Kaylee Anthony, who was reported missing by her grandmother, Cindy Anthony, on July 15, 2008. Cindy believed Kaylee was with her mother, Casey Anthony, who had been lying about their whereabouts. The situation escalated when Casey's car was found in an impound lot, leading to the discovery that she had not been on vacation as claimed. After five months, Kaylee's body was found, and it was determined she had died by homicide. Guests Cheney Mason, a defense attorney for Casey, and Beth Karas, a former prosecutor, join Megyn to analyze the case. They discuss Casey's behavior during the month Kaylee was missing, including partying and getting a tattoo, which raised suspicions about her involvement. Casey was charged with child neglect, but the prosecution later pursued murder charges after Kaylee's remains were discovered. The discussion highlights the complexities of the case, including the defense's argument that Casey was in a state of denial and did not know her child was dead. Cheney asserts that Casey was not aware of Kaylee's death during the critical 30-day period. The defense also introduced the theory that Kaylee's death was accidental, claiming George Anthony, Casey's father, found her after she drowned. The trial was marked by media frenzy and public scrutiny, leading to a not guilty verdict for Casey on murder charges, which shocked the nation. Jurors later expressed their struggles with the decision, feeling they lacked sufficient evidence to convict her. The conversation touches on the prosecution's failure to prove key elements of the case and the impact of the defense's strategy, including allegations of sexual abuse against George Anthony, which complicated the jury's perception. Overall, the case remains a topic of fascination and debate, with many questioning the justice system's handling of the evidence and the verdict reached.

Megyn Kelly discusses the Jody Arias case, marking 15 years since the murder of Travis Alexander by his ex-girlfriend, Jody Arias. Kelly is joined by criminal defense attorney Mark Iglarsh to analyze the case's details, including the events leading to the murder, Arias's life in prison, and the trial's defense and prosecution strategies. Arias and Alexander met in 2006 at a business conference and dated briefly before their relationship turned physical. Their tumultuous relationship included a staged burglary at Arias's grandparents' house just days before the murder, which suggests premeditation. On June 4, 2008, Arias killed Alexander in a brutal attack, stabbing him 27 times, slitting his throat, and shooting him. The crime scene was gruesome, and Alexander's body was not discovered for five days. During the trial, Arias initially claimed she was innocent and that intruders were responsible. However, she later shifted her defense to self-defense, alleging Alexander had abused her. The prosecution presented strong evidence against her, including photographs taken during the murder. Despite her manipulative behavior and the brutality of the crime, the jury ultimately sentenced her to life in prison without parole after a hung jury could not agree on the death penalty. Both the prosecutor, Juan Martinez, and Arias's defense attorney were later disbarred, highlighting the case's complexities. Arias remains a controversial figure, continuing to attract media attention and manipulate those around her while serving her sentence. The discussion emphasizes the unpredictability of human behavior and the challenges of understanding criminal psychology.

In this special edition of the Megyn Kelly Show, the focus is on the upcoming trial of Brian Colberg, accused of murdering four college students in Idaho. The trial is set to begin in 2024 and will be televised. Colberg maintains his innocence, with his defense team arguing that the prosecution's case is not strong. Key evidence includes DNA found on a knife sheath linked to Colberg's father, but the defense claims the DNA could have been planted. The prosecution also relies on cell phone pings and surveillance footage of Colberg's car near the crime scene, though these connections are not definitive. Eyewitness accounts and the lack of a murder weapon complicate the case further. The defense plans to present an alibi, stating Colberg was driving alone that night, but lacks specific witnesses. Additionally, the defense is exploring potential drug-related motives tied to the local drug scene, raising questions about other suspects. The trial's outcome remains uncertain as both sides prepare for a complex legal battle.