reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The problem with Islam is that Islam is an absolutist religion where Muslims believe this is the word of God aka Allah and no man can ever question the word of Allah which is extremely problematic and it has no place in any civilized culture. Chapter two verse 98. Allah is an enemy of non muslims. Chapter three verse 85: No other religion is accepted other than Islam. Chapter eight verse 12: Allah will instill fear in the hearts of those who disbelieve Islam and Muslims. You cut their limbs by hitting their necks. Chapter three verse 118. Make only Muslims your intimate friends. Chapter three verse 28 and chapter nine verse 23, do not make friends with non Muslims. Chapter eight verse 39. Fight non Muslims until the faith of Allah is fully established. Chapter 22 verse 30. Idols are filth. Chapter nine verse five, ambush and kill the idolaters and wherever and whenever you can find them. Chapter 33 verse 61, wherever the faithful and the idolaters are caught, they will be brutally killed. Chapter three verse 62, chapter two verse two fifty five, chapter 27 verse 61, and chapter 35 verse three. There is no other god than Allah. Chapter 21 verse 98 Those who worship anyone other than Allah are the fuel of hell. Idolaters are pure and unholy. Chapter four verse 101 Kafirs are open enemies and kafirs are basically sinners so anyone that doesn't believe in Islam will. Chapter nine verse 14: Allah will punish the disbelievers at the hands of the believers. Be cruel to the prisoners of war. Chapter eight verse 69: All spoils including women are halal, and that refers to the fact that Muhammad said that if Muslims go and conquer the land, then the women in that land are halal or permissible to the soldiers. Chapter nine verse 29 by humiliating infidels make jizya from them so if you don't know what jizya is, jizya is basically a tax imposed on non muslims when muslims govern the land so what used to happen was is that muslims attacked such 10 countries and they established a caliphate, so they either killed people that didn't convert to Islam, but some groups they were like okay if you don't want to convert to Islam you have to pay us an extra tax and that was called the jizya. Chapter 66 verse nine Do jihad war with the infidels and the beneficiaries. Chapter four verse 56: Will cook the skin of the disbeliever and you see that sometimes you know it happens in Pakistan, happens in Afghanistan when someone is blasphemous towards the Quran or Muhammad, they burn them to death, and it actually happened recently to some girl that was accused of ripping up the Quran and they burned her to death in public. Chapter eight verse 57: Be cruel to the prisoners of war. Chapter eight verse 69: All spoils including women are halal. Chapter nine verse 14: Allah will punish the disbelievers at the hands of the believers. Chapter thirty two verse 22: take revenge on those who leave islam so as you know the punishment for apostasy is death in islam and I'm considered an apostate because I'm an ex muslim so I just went through these verses okay to just spread awareness first of all but at the same time I want to know from the Labour government and from Kyrgyzstanbul are we as a homophobic if we question these things? It says in the Quran right and I didn't go for the hadiths because the hadiths are a thousand times worse. Are we as a homophobic if we question the life of Muhammad? Because he took part in 29 offensive battles.

"Perhaps thousands of young women have been drugged, raped, and beaten across dozens of UK cities by men belonging to so called grooming gangs." "December 2020, British authorities charged 32 men in a grooming gang with 200 sexual exploitation offenses against eight girls, some as young as 13." "Most perpetrators convicted so far are reportedly Muslim. The majority of their victims are white." "because she was white, a non Muslim, a virgin, and didn't dress modestly, that she deserved to be punished." "She escaped a year later, becoming part of The UK's largest ever child sexual abuse investigation." "In her new book, Pray, Somali born women's rights activist Ayan Hirsi Ali argues that immigration and Islam are major factors threatening women's safety."

The discussion highlights the severe issues of sexual abuse and victimization of young girls, particularly within certain cultural contexts. A 13-year-old girl named Scarlett was drugged and abused, yet no perpetrators have been held accountable. There is a concern that authorities fear confronting the Muslim community, influenced by a culture of victim blaming and extremist ideologies. The existence of Sharia law is criticized for its treatment of victims and acceptance of practices like child marriage. Personal experiences of bullying and harassment are shared, illustrating the dangers faced by those outside the dominant culture. The speaker expresses frustration over the lack of support for victims and the silence surrounding these atrocities. Thank you for sharing your insights.

Selling drugs, murder, adultery, rape, alcohol, and other sins are all bad in the eyes of Allah. However, a person who commits these sins but still prays is better in Allah's eyes than someone who doesn't commit these sins but doesn't pray. Remember, praying is important.

A woman is punished by being stoned to death according to Sharia law. She must be buried up to her waist to prevent her from being seen.

The speaker describes witnessing the victim's injuries, stating they tried to stop the bleeding and saw the victim's soul leave. The interviewer notes the victim's husband publicly forgave the perpetrator soon after the event and asks the speaker how they feel about forgiveness. The speaker says they are angry at the perpetrator and that what happened is not fair. They state that while forgiveness is possible, they are not ready to forgive the perpetrator for taking their brother, who was also their best friend.

If a wife embarrasses herself in public, she may be lusted after. Some men get emails about wives acting this way, which is difficult to deal with. If a husband allows his wife to act in such a manner, he is considered a "dayouth" and will not enter Jannah, nor even smell it. The Prophet said that if he saw someone with his wife, he would kill him. While this doesn't mean one is allowed to kill, the Prophet was praising protective jealousy. Allah has more protective jealousy than him, so it is a praiseworthy attribute. In some cultures, even speaking about someone else's sister is forbidden.

The punishment for transgressing the Noahide laws is death. The laws are complex, covering various aspects such as marriage and idolatry, which differ for Jews and non-Jews. For instance, the implications of bowing down to an idol involve nuanced considerations, including intentions and actions. While some laws are stricter for Jews, non-Jews face different standards. The key point is that the punishment for violating these laws is severe, leading to frustration among some. A non-Jew can be punished without prior warning, unlike a Jew, where a warning is necessary. This distinction is based on logical interpretations of the Torah.

Her that she is punished and she is stoned to death. And according to the sharia again, when it comes to women, they must be there must be a there must be a hole dug in the in the earth, in the in the ground, and she must be covered up to the half of the body. So that her does not appear.

If someone commits rape and murder and the court cannot prove it, but they truly repent, Allah will most probably forgive them if they fulfill five criteria: admitting the sin, stopping it immediately, not repeating it, and sincerely asking Allah for forgiveness. Even murder can be forgiven with true repentance because Allah is merciful. It is not injustice to the victim because both the rapist and the victim are undergoing a test. Allah has given guidelines for women to dress modestly and cover their bodies except for the face. If a girl doesn't dress modestly and is raped, she is partly to blame, though this doesn't give the rapist the right to rape. If she wore obscene clothes that incited the rape, she is responsible. However, if she wore normal clothes and was still raped, it is a test for her to see if she followed Allah's advice on appropriate clothing. If she did not, she is to blame for attracting men.

Rape is a serious issue, and there are concerns about how certain cases are handled, particularly involving Asian men. In some instances, victims feel that police are less likely to pursue cases involving these perpetrators. This raises questions about the fear of being labeled racist, which may hinder proper investigations. There is a need for an open discussion about these issues, as well as a cultural shift regarding female sexuality in Britain. Women should not be judged or blamed for their choices, and the message must be clear: consent is paramount, and rape is unacceptable in any context. It's essential to foster an environment where women feel safe expressing their sexuality without fear.

In Islam, marrying a 100-year-old woman may cause harm, but marrying a developed 13-year-old may not. The speaker believes it's about avoiding harm in relationships. They mention the legality of marrying older vs. younger individuals in different countries, emphasizing the relative nature of pedophilia.

I falsely accused others of rape, which was wrong. I betrayed the trust of many who believed in me and created a false story for validation from people instead of seeking it from God. I acknowledge my wrongdoing and hope for forgiveness.

In our religion, capital punishment is justified for those who leave and spread corruption. It is not for individuals to take into their own hands, but under an emir's authority in an Islamic state. The Sharia aims to protect society over individual freedoms like drinking alcohol or causing harm. This prioritization is crucial to prevent chaos and maintain order.

Anne Cryer attempted to assist families whose daughters were victims of Asian on-street grooming, where the offenders were primarily from the Pakistani community. She believed the police and social services were hesitant to intervene due to fear of being labeled racist. A local Muslim counselor represented Anne to the elders, hoping they would discourage the behavior as un-Islamic, but they declined. One speaker suggested a possible link to Islam, citing the Quran's allowance of taking sexual slaves, while another speaker refuted this interpretation. He stated that Islam is against grooming, child abuse, and any form of abuse. Another speaker mentioned imams delivering sermons against grooming and highlighted the increasing severity of sentences for such crimes. Anne believes the Muslim community could have done more to address the groomers.

Speaker 0 asks if at some point there will be sharia law everywhere. Speaker 1 replies, “Percent. This is my goal and every Muslim's goal.” Speaker 0 acknowledges the idea of establishing sharia law on earth and asks what would happen to someone like them who is a murtad and believes they should be killed under sharia if such law is universal. Speaker 1 states that the decision is “up to the army.” Speaker 0 questions whether it would be fair under Islamic law for someone to be killed simply because they arrived at the wrong conclusion, asserting they would be killed for being a murtad, and asks if that would be fair. Speaker 1 reiterates, “In the Sharia law, that's what I follow,” and that if sharia is universal, the speaker would follow that rule. Speaker 0 challenges the fairness of a system where their safety hinges on adherence to sharia, noting that if Islam dominates all of earth, there would be no safe haven for them. Speaker 1 confirms this by saying, “That's the plan. And you where.” Speaker 0 asks where their safe haven would be if all of earth is under Islam, and suggests that safety would have to come from Islam itself. Speaker 1 responds that safety would be found within Islam, implying it would be by force if necessary. Speaker 0 contends that safe haven would require conversion to Islam, and if they do not return to Islam, punishment would be death. Speaker 1 concludes that there are two choices, then says “Slam or death,” indicating the binary outcome under the stated framework.

Speaker 0 asks if Allah loves all Christians. Speaker 1 responds that Allah loves the believers. They state that if someone does not believe in Allah, there is no reason why Allah would love them. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 loves Christians. Speaker 1 answers that there is an article of faith in Islam which states that you love the believers and you do not love disbelief.

- The conversation centers on Andrew Tate and a divide in the conservative space about whether he is a “good guy” or a bad guy. A video of Tate is shown to frame the discussion. - A video excerpt from Speaker 1 features Tate describing how he became a multimillionaire by creating a webcam studio. He explains he took girls who lacked experience or equipment and built a system that allowed him to convince them to participate, retain 100% control of their income, and ensure they were effective in a highly competitive industry. He stresses that it’s not easy money and that the process requires many tips and tricks to ensure a girl can make money from home, implying that once trained, a girl could potentially earn unlimited money. He also questions why a girl would stay with him once she can make money independently. - Speaker 0 argues that Tate was a webcam operator who objectified women and acted like a pimp. They reference a separate video showing Tate allegedly whipping a girl and note that if the girl was 15 at the time based on Tate’s stated age, that would be problematic. They ask whether Tate should be given a pass and invite thoughts on fairness in criticizing him. - Speaker 2 weighs in with nuance, saying it is not black-and-white and that they have not done a deep dive into Tate’s entire situation. They acknowledge Tate’s past involvement with encouraging girls to participate in OnlyFans-style content and express disapproval, hoping Tate would publicly acknowledge that this was a mistake and express regret. They note that many women enter porn or stripping due to desperation or trafficking, suggesting vulnerability in those Tate might have preyed upon. They admit uncertainty about whether Tate committed criminal acts, mentioning potential legal age issues (Tate operating in a country where the legal age of consent is 16, and a separate girl possibly being 15) and the absence of victims coming forward. - Speaker 2 also claims Tate has been unfairly persecuted. They describe a prior raid/arrest and a social media “PizzaGate” narrative on X (formerly Twitter), arguing that while PizzaGate itself is real, Tate’s alleged actions do not compare to Hillary Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged activities. They emphasize that Tate is being portrayed unfairly and that redemption would be preferable. - Both speakers discuss redemption and reform: Speaker 2 suggests Tate could seek redemption by stating regret for past actions, condemning the porn/OnlyFans route, and encouraging women to avoid or leave such work, highlighting the need for support, healing, and respect for women who have experienced abuse. They suggest a forgiving community could respond positively to an acknowledgment and a commitment to change, rather than punitive treatment.

The conversation opens with Speaker 0 making a provocative claim that everything people experience, including rape and addiction, is attracted into their life, and that the people involved in rape or pedophilia are attracted to those acts. Speaker 1 pushes back, asking for clarification about cases of pedophilia and how these dynamics should be understood. Speaker 0 continues by saying that the children are attracted to the pedophile, and Speaker 1 challenges them to pursue the line of thought by asking to go there. They discuss how labels of good and bad are often tied to who one chooses to side with. Speaker 0 expresses discomfort with the implication of the discussion and provides a hypothetical: if someone assaulted his wife at home, he would “forcibly stop” them and would value stopping the act “100% certainly.” He argues that morality at the moment would drive one’s reaction to harm, and asserts that when one sees something as evil, one would act to stop it, emphasizing that it is evil in one’s perception. Speaker 0 then asserts a universal standard: it is not acceptable to beat a child to a pulp or to sexually assault a child. He argues that there is something fundamental inside humans—a driving force toward life, love, freedom, and the experience of living in the world—and when someone intentionally interferes with that, there is an obligation to try to prevent or stop them. He adds that one can override impulses, acknowledging personal temptation to harm that has been resisted. Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of repressing desires and then attacking his customers publicly. He suggests Speaker 0 is taking information that contradicts his stated beliefs and refuses to broadcast it because it conflicts with his system, describing it as a fight that Speaker 0 is ready to engage in. The tension is evident as Speaker 0’s and Speaker 1’s reactions become increasingly heated; Speaker 0 notes that Speaker 1’s hands are shaking. Speaker 1 criticizes the stance of not exposing certain information on the show, arguing that it challenges his beliefs and that he is unwilling to “pacify” his research for anyone. He asserts that there are upsides to events, even to the murder of children, stating that there are upsides to it. Speaker 0 concludes with an abrupt decision to stop the discussion: “I think we’re gonna have to stop here, John.”

There are many young women, including one recently murdered, with the idea that she was murdered by an immigrant. However, many young women are raped by their in-laws, spouses, or siblings, and they can do nothing about it. Attempts are then made to arrest them when they cross state lines.

I didn't think I was just going to be killed; I expected other things to happen to me as well. So, you believed you might also be raped? Yes, I did. And now you understand that this fear stems from your experience? Yes, I think so.

A person expresses their disregard for innocent people in certain situations and their belief that everyone involved is guilty. They mention the need for Iraqis to handle their own problems and express frustration about the loss of lives. They also make derogatory comments about people wearing head coverings. The conversation then shifts to a girl who was involved in a disturbing situation, where she was exploited for money before tragically taking her own life. The reason for her suicide is attributed to cultural disapproval.

Both the rapist and the victim are undergoing a test. Allah has given guidelines for women to dress modestly and cover their bodies, except for the face. If a girl doesn't dress modestly and is raped, she is partly to blame. This doesn't give the boy the right to rape, but the girl also has to follow the Quran's guidance. If she wore clothes that incited the rape, she is responsible. However, if she wore normal clothes and was still raped, it is a test for her to see if she was following Allah's advice by wearing appropriate clothes. If she was not, then she is to blame for attracting the men.