TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

525 hogs were given a live mRNA vaccine, resulting in 25 deaths, 55 near-death anorexic cases, lameness in 20, loss of condition in 12, and near-death symptoms in 25 more. Autopsies revealed remnants of the vaccine in the meat. This poses risks for consumers and producers, affecting both health and business. The concern is the presence of live virus in meat for consumption and the impact on animal health and business sustainability. Share thoughts in the comments and spread awareness. Support local and American products.

The speaker discusses the use of mRNA in food and mentions a presentation about genetically engineering mosquitoes to deliver vaccines through mosquito bites. They mention that the Gates Foundation is funding this research, although they don't have proof of its viability. The speaker clarifies that they are not suggesting that the mosquitoes are currently injecting anyone with anything, but they have evidence that efforts are being made to enable mosquito injections.

There is a concerning loophole in the law regarding the food supply. If a cow or pig receives an mRNA gene therapy, they can still be labeled as organic. This means that organic food can potentially contain these therapies. The issue arises if the therapy alters their DNA, can be transmitted to humans, or remains in their system. These factors make it possible for consumers to unknowingly consume these substances in their organic food.

The USDA approved self-amplifying mRNA injections for rabies and other diseases in cats and dogs. These injections are authorized, widely available for online purchase, and administered by veterinarians. The speaker claims that these injections can possibly shed onto humans. The platform, Nobivac NXT developed by Merck, is available for purchase online. According to the speaker, if pets receive Nobivac NXT, they might shed self-amplifying RNA or antigens onto owners through bodily fluids. The speaker asserts that this was not tested and was authorized regardless. The effects are currently unknown.

I support my amendment to prevent funding for transgenic edible vaccines. This concept is not far-fetched; research is underway to turn plants like lettuce and spinach into mRNA vaccine producers. The goal is for individuals to grow these plants in their gardens, which raises safety concerns. Past incidents, such as vaccine contamination in corn meant for livestock, highlight the risks of cross-contamination. We need to prioritize food safety and ensure the public knows what’s in their food. Contaminating our food supply with foreign DNA poses unknown dangers. Given recent experiences, we should be cautious about funding this research. I urge support for my amendment.

mRNA technology, used in COVID vaccines, raises ethical concerns about potential control. Multiple genes and regulatory elements can be inserted, allowing for different vaccinations and antigens to be regulated. This could lead to unknown protein expression when consuming certain foods. S. Matthew Liao, a philosopher, suggests using human engineering to address global issues like meat consumption. By making people intolerant to certain proteins, it could reduce meat consumption and benefit the planet. Doctor Christina Parkes expresses ethical concerns about the regulation of genetic information through hormones, airborne substances, and the food supply. These discussions highlight the potential dangers and ethical implications of mRNA technology and human engineering.

Technology is being rapidly advanced and implemented in humans, particularly messenger RNA vaccines. These advancements are being fast-tracked, and it's important to acknowledge that our food species will also be affected by these vaccines.

In 2022, the first mRNA vaccine for pigs was approved, developed by Zoetis (formerly part of Pfizer), but meat labeling isn't required. Consumers eating pork may unknowingly consume meat from mRNA-vaccinated animals. The vaccine targets porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), common in confined pigs on industrial farms. Pasture-raised pigs, with fresh air, space, and natural disease resistance, don't typically have this issue. mRNA technology is approved for pigs but is still being researched for cattle and poultry, so long-term risks in livestock and humans are not fully understood. To avoid mRNA in pork, consumers should know their farmer and choose pasture-raised options. No vaccines or mRNA vaccines are used in nourished pork production.

The speaker states that mRNA in food is a critical issue, but also highlights the potential for transgenic mosquitoes to deliver vaccines via saliva. They reference a presentation about producing a transgenic mosquito as a "flying syringe" to deliver protective vaccines. The speaker claims the Gates Foundation is funding genetic engineering of mosquitoes with the intention of using mosquito bites for vaccination. While they don't have definitive proof of its viability, they assert that this research is underway. The speaker clarifies they are not claiming current mosquitoes are injecting people with anything. However, they state they have indisputable evidence that efforts are being made to enable mosquitoes to inject people with substances in the future.

The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines contain fragments of DNA, which can integrate into the genomic DNA of cells and become a permanent part of the cell. This poses a potential risk of autoimmune attacks and future cancer. The DNA contamination occurred during the production process, where a plasmid vector was used to scale up the production of the RNA template. The regulatory threshold for DNA in vaccines is outdated and not suitable for this new type of vaccine. The speaker believes that DNA sequencing should be done on vaccinated individuals' stem cells to determine if this theoretical risk has occurred. Informed consent is necessary, and the lack of transparency regarding the DNA contamination is concerning.

A person knows a kid who works at a feedlot in Nebraska. The feedlot was bought out by a company, leading to an increase in vaccine use. The company plans to implement mRNA vaccines for cattle, which was trialed on pigs. The pigs experienced negative effects, with some dying and traces of the vaccine found in their meat. This raises concerns about the potential impact on humans.

The mRNA in vaccines can replicate, including the replication engine, leading to potential spread from person to person. Concerns exist about the inability to stop this replication, with unknown consequences for humanity. The spike protein in these vaccines can be toxic, affecting various tissues. Deployment of this technology in vaccines for humans is already happening, with over 4,000 people injected in Japan.

Speaker 0 notes that vaccines are entering the food chain in several species. He mentions that currently, all farmed shrimp are being vaccinated with mRNA, and that pork is an unknown amount being vaccinated with mRNA. He references Merck, described as one of the originators of ivermectin, and asks why they didn’t make a big fuss about the money they lost during COVID because of the inability to sell ivermectin into the whole thing, suggesting they could have been a kingpin in this, and they were silent. He says this is because they own a lot of mRNA companies. He notes that some of the companies state on their advertising, “we put the right gene in your livestock vaccine.” He states there are vaccines going into the swine industry, but there is no data on how much is being sold, where, and who the buyers are, so the volume remains speculative. The technology is described as customized vaccines where, on a farm, they take samples of the diseases on the farm, then go into the lab, and a few days later, they produce an mRNA vaccine customized to the farm’s diseases. He emphasizes that there’s no testing, no research, nothing. They have a general understanding of the mRNA aspect of it on a general standpoint, but for each of these antigens, there is known no understanding.

A study involving 525 hogs injected with a live mRNA vaccine revealed concerning outcomes. After 21 days, 25 hogs died, 55 became severely anorexic, 20 experienced lameness, and 12 showed loss of condition. Overall, 30% of the animals either died or exhibited near-death symptoms. Autopsies revealed remnants of the live virus vaccine in the meat of deceased hogs, raising consumer health concerns regarding the presence of a live virus in meat products. For producers, this situation poses risks to animal health, herd viability, and business sustainability. It’s important to spread awareness about these findings and support local American products.

The USDA last year approved self amplifying mRNA injections for our cats and our dogs for rabies and a few other things. And these are authorized and they're widely available for online purchase. And so veterinarians across the country are currently injecting self amplifying mRNA into our pets. If you look up Nobivac Nex NXT, it's the platform developed by Merck. You will find it online, and you can even buy it. It's possible if their dogs or cats receive the Nobivac NXT self self amplifying RNA particles. It's possible they are either shedding the self amplifying RNA or the antigen products that the dogs or cats are now producing onto the owners through bodily fluids. And so, none of this was tested by the way. They just authorized it anyways because they don't care.

In 2022, Zhang and colleagues reportedly stabilized a segment of the spike protein receptor binding domain in an exosome and immunized mice by feeding them milk containing it, suggesting mRNA can cross the GI tract. The USDA is allegedly co-developing genetic vaccines for the food supply, including vegetables, fruits, and livestock. Self-replicating RNA vaccines are already used in pork to prevent porcine diseases. Despite some experts believing conventional veterinary vaccines are sufficient, Merck is advancing the technology for livestock, with proposals for use in cattle. Missouri has attempted to legislate transparency regarding the use of genetic vaccines to protect the food supply.

There's a Pfizer subsidiary called ZOTIS that has mRNA injected over 100 million wildlife in the U.S., including pets. This initiative, funded by Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, has been ongoing for the past year and a half. Hunters were the primary source of information about this, as it was published in their magazines. A study on Staten Island involved injecting 100 white-tailed deer with Pfizer's mRNA vaccines, leading to widespread administration across the country without public knowledge. Concerns arise about hunters consuming venison, believing it to be organic. Additionally, mRNA technology is being used on vegetables and cattle, raising further worries about food safety.

Lobbyists for cattlemen and pork associations will use mRNA COVID vaccines on livestock. Attorney Tom Rens warns there are no laws requiring informed consent for vaccinated food, nor are there laws requiring disclosure of food being vaccinated with the spike protein clot shot. The UK passed the Genetic Technology Precision Breeding Bill of 1990 to exclude references to precision bred organisms, another term for gene edited. Gene edited food can be legally marketed in the UK and can be labeled non-GMO in America. If butchered in America, it can be labeled Product of USA.

The speaker claims that "The USDA last year approved self amplifying mRNA injections for our cats and our dogs for rabies and a few other things. And these are authorized and they're widely available for online purchase." They say "veterinarians across the country are currently injecting self amplifying mRNA into our pets." They warn that "This can probably shut on to humans and this this has to be stopped" and ask, "Has it started yet?" "Yes." They cite "Nobivac Nex NXT, it's the platform developed by Merck" and that "you will find it online, and you can even buy it." They claim it is "possible... they are either shedding the self amplifying RNA or the antigen products that the dogs or cats are now producing onto the owners through bodily fluids." They add that "none of this was tested" and "they just authorized it anyways because they don't care," and that "it's completely unknown really at this point."

The speaker claims mRNA is in the food supply. Merck has been injecting mRNA into pigs since 2018 with a product called Sequebiti. They claim to be able to make transmissible mRNA, meaning they can put it in an animal so that it transmits to whoever is ingesting it, effectively vaccinating them. The speaker suggests this could be engineered into plants and animals. Without informed consent laws, people who refused mRNA vaccines may get them through their food.

Doctors and politicians have promoted vaccines, but refuse to acknowledge potential harm. Many Americans who received the vaccine may face unknown risks. The truth must be revealed to prevent future harm from the mRNA platform.

mRNA vaccines are being introduced into the food chain, particularly in farmed shrimp and swine. Merck, known for ivermectin, has remained quiet about its financial losses during COVID, possibly due to its ownership of several mRNA companies. These companies advertise customized vaccines for livestock, created by sampling diseases on farms and producing tailored mRNA vaccines in a matter of days. However, there is a lack of data on the extent of these vaccines' use and no thorough testing or research on the specific antigens involved. The understanding of mRNA technology is general, but detailed knowledge about each antigen is absent.

The discussion centers on pets being used as self-amplifying mRNA vectors. The USDA quietly approved Merck's self-amplifying RNA shots called Novavac NXT for cats and dogs with no real safety testing. It says it gives a small dose of RNA particles delivered in the Novavac NXT vaccine. RNA copies exponentially in the cells, and the copies are transcripted into large amounts of the desired antigen. The antigen stimulates a more robust humular and cellular immune response. All sounds good in theory. However, these injections may shed messenger RNA and synthetic antigens to human owners through breath, saliva, or fluids may cause long term genetic damage similar to that seen in humans may recombine with wild viruses creating dangerous new pathogens. This rollout puts both pets and their owners into an uncontrolled genetic experiment without consent. “So says Nicholas Holcher, Miles per hour. So masters in public health. We don't know. Nobody tested it. Nobody did any studies. We don't have long term studies. We don't have short term studies. We just don't know. I'm a little scared. I really don't want to be a part of this.” And by the way, they're actually talking about spraying messenger RNA on our crops. How are we affecting our I feel like this is the everybody remember the book Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. I think I had to read it in high school. Was one of those required readings. Or what was the other book? 1984? Like, I feel like we're living in this dystopian universe where we just experiment with all these genetic things and we just throw it into the environment and throw it into our pets and throw it into people, and we don't know what the outcome is until we see. Are we all gonna go the way the dinosaurs? I don't know. Now I really sound like a conspiracy theorist. Are we all gonna like, is somebody gonna come along in a few thousand years and find fossil remains and try to figure out why we all died? I don't know. It's fine. It's fine. It's just a little nervous.” One speaker says they homestead: they raise their own chickens. They’re not treated with chemicals. Their dogs and cats don't get vaccinated with things that might shed into the environment, and they’re growing all their own organic fruits and vegetables. “Yep, I'm I'm I'm going that way. Y'all y'all do what you need to do. It's a little scary. I don't recommend that particular vaccine for your dogs. I I guess that's the bottom line. I don't know. Be careful what you eat.”

Transgenic lettuce is being developed to produce mRNA vaccines. The idea is to genetically engineer lettuce and spinach so that consuming them can provide vaccination against biological threats. However, there are scientific problems and potential health risks associated with this proposal. Moreover, it is part of a broader plan to bypass informed consent by incorporating mRNA gene technology into food. Another concerning concept is self-spreading vaccines, where respiratory viruses carry the vaccine and infect others. These proposals are seen as dangerous, reckless, and ethically and scientifically unsound.

Hospital 1169 requires disclosure of gene therapy qualities in products, discusses transmission of gene therapy aspects, and mandates informed consent. However, there is opposition to the bill, particularly from big pharma and agricultural lobbyists. Research reveals that vaccines may be integrated into foods, with a product called Seqevity already on the market. This technology could potentially transmit mRNA gene therapies from animals to humans. Concerns arise due to the removal of country of origin labels on food products, making it uncertain if this practice is already happening in the United States. Opposition to the bill comes from companies like Bayer Monsanto, who are incorporating gene therapy into seeds and livestock. The fight against informed consent is puzzling.