reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We anticipate significant reductions in the federal government, including the outright elimination of certain agencies. There will be mass layoffs in areas deemed bloated, along with substantial cuts to federal contractors who are overcharging. We expect to implement these changes swiftly, aided by the legal framework provided by the Supreme Court.

The President told me to be more aggressive, so we sent out an email to all employees asking what they do. We got a partial response, so we're sending another email. Our goal isn't to be unfair. Employees can simply respond that their work is too sensitive to describe. We want to keep essential employees who do their jobs well. If a job isn't essential or done well, those people shouldn't be on the payroll. Those million employees who haven't responded are on the bubble. Maybe they don't exist, or we're paying people who don't exist. A lot could have happened. The prior administration wasted money.

The people want an active government that doesn't waste money. To deliver change, we're reorganizing the government to save taxpayer dollars. We're cutting the federal bureaucracy by 100,000 positions through attrition and reducing administrative costs by 12%. Unproductive advisory commissions will be eliminated, and agencies can't create new ones without approval. Government regulations and procurement rules hurt the system, so we will cut waste, streamline bureaucracy, and change these rules to make government work better. This includes downsizing the government, improving customer service, and overhauling federal procurement and personnel systems. The goal is to make government work for the people, eliminate unnecessary programs, and reduce the federal workforce. We're committed to cutting spending and reducing the deficit to ensure a stronger economy for the future.

The federal government isn't a company to dismantle. It requires constitutional adherence, not a Shark Tank takeover approach. The government is fat and hasn't been scrutinized in a century. An individual is willing to do this work for free, but isn't cutting enough. In private equity, when dealing with a broken company, you cut deep and fast, then rehire. He should cut 20% more. It's all fat and waste. You can't be surgically precise, you have to cut more because you don't know. We've never audited government for a hundred years.

I want key positions in the federal government, like the Office of Personnel Management and the Office of Management and Budget, filled by individuals who share my anti-government, anti-bureaucratic mindset. The Trump experience taught me that appointing those aligned with the managerial class is a mistake. I aim to cut 75% of the federal bureaucracy and need to identify the top 25% of performers to retain. We're developing a comprehensive screening process to select for excellence based on psychological assessments, knowledge, and work ethic. Additionally, I recognize the importance of acting quickly in the first year, focusing on executive actions rather than legislative agendas, and starting preparations before the election.

On day 1, the speaker suggests cutting 75% of the federal bureaucracy and implementing mass firings. They emphasize the need for drastic measures, comparing it to using a chainsaw instead of a chisel. The speaker mentions their support for a figure in Argentina and their philosophy as a libertarian internationalist. They advocate for shutting down administrative agencies that represent a combination of state and corporate power. They propose using the military to protect the country's own border instead of getting involved in foreign affairs. The speaker concludes by stating that they can implement these changes as commander in chief on day 1.

Budget reform isn't an option; it's essential. The American people deserve transparency and accountability to see where their tax dollars go. We must ensure funds are used as intended. We're committed to scrutinizing the federal budget, line by line, eliminating wasteful programs and ensuring cost-effectiveness. It should be easy to cut pointless waste that benefits no one. We aim to establish a new culture of efficiency, not just within our administration, but for every administration that follows. No amount of waste is acceptable when it's your money. We all know government inefficiency exists. Reorganizing and finding efficiency is challenging, and frankly, some of these necessary changes are overdue.

To reduce the size of government, I plan a 75% reduction in federal employees during my first term, with 50% cut in the first year. This includes shutting down agencies like the FBI, IRS, ATF, CDC, and Department of Education. Reviving the integrity of our constitutional republic requires this action. If elected president, I believe in term limits for bureaucrats, just as I would have a limit on my own term. As a CEO, I know that if employees can't be fired, they don't truly work for you. This approach will ensure accountability and efficiency in government.

There's a lot of inefficiency in government that needs addressing. When it comes to which agencies to shut down, I'll let Elon Musk share his thoughts, as he's eager to discuss this. Musk is not just known for his work in science and rockets; he's also an excellent businessman and cost cutter. He often shares innovations, like a new titanium screw he's developed, which showcases his focus on efficiency and improvement.

The speaker says they are aligned with Elon Musk's actions and that moving fast is necessary to overcome vested interests in Washington D.C., where 25% of the U.S. GDP pulsates. Musk believes he's taking back the American people's cheese, not just moving someone's cheese. Changes cause immediate perception of cuts, while benefits take months to materialize. The speaker clarifies it's the Department of Government Efficiency, not extinction, aiming to improve operations without demonizing federal employees. Major savings will come from reducing reliance on contractors. One firm, Booz Allen, receives 98% of its revenue from the government, indicating poor risk management. Despite rules for six-month contracts, some individuals have been in place for twenty years through continuous renewals. The administration's transparency is crucial for taxpayers to understand the extent of the "grift."

The American people want effective government without wasted money. To deliver this, we're overhauling how government operates, beginning with a 25% reduction in White House staff and $10 million in savings. These steps will save taxpayers $9 billion. We're reducing the federal bureaucracy by at least 100,000 positions through attrition and cutting administrative costs by 12%. We're also eliminating unproductive advisory commissions. We aim to cut inessential spending and tackle the growing deficit and debt. Government programs should be efficient, and overhead must be reduced. These changes are crucial because debt consumes tax dollars and hinders private sector growth. We're also working to cut waste, streamline processes, improve customer service, and reform procurement and personnel systems. We need a government that works better, costs less, and treats taxpayers like customers.

The speaker states that eliminating the deficit requires cutting billions from valued programs, but eliminating pointless waste should be easy, even if the cuts are small. The federal government funds a website for the Fiddling Foresters, a folk music ensemble of forest rangers, and hundreds of similar sites should be consolidated or eliminated. Taxpayers also fund thousands of unused buildings, including a massive, empty warehouse in Brooklyn that the government has owned for a decade. Red tape and Washington politics have prevented the sale of these buildings, but the speaker claims they are cutting through the red tape and plan to get rid of the buildings in the months ahead. The speaker has asked the Vice President to lead a renewed effort to hunt down misspent tax dollars in every agency, calling it the campaign to cut waste.

I've issued a deadline for agencies to submit waste reduction plans. Failure to comply will result in tech support intervention, which is essentially what my team is doing – fixing outdated government computer systems. We aim to find a trillion dollars in savings to prevent national bankruptcy. Every agency will have a "mini Elon Musk" to justify spending. We're freezing government credit cards for 30 days and doing a pulse check via email to see if employees are real and responsive, we suspect some are dead or even fictional. Some people are upset with our aid to Ukraine which has been spent on things like fashion shows, wine, and cheese puffs. Providing money to LGBTQ individuals in Serbia is also coming under fire. Some are questioning the loyalty of Elon Musk because of this. The Biden years proved we don't even need an active president, because institutions are running everything behind the scenes.

The speaker says they are aligned with Elon's actions and that moving fast is necessary to overcome vested interests. Within a ten-mile radius, 25% of the US GDP pulsates, and everyone wants to "skim a little." Elon believes he's moving the American people's cheese, not someone else's. Changes cause people to come after Elon and the administration, and the benefits of cuts aren't immediately visible, creating a perception challenge. The speaker clarifies that it's the Department of Government Efficiency, not extinction, aiming to improve government operations without demonizing federal employees. Two significant savings will come from cutting contractors. One organization, Booz Allen, receives 98% of its revenue from the government, indicating a risk management failure and entrenched interests. Despite a six-month contract limit, some individuals have been in place for twenty years through repeated contracts. The administration's transparency in exposing this "grift" is crucial for taxpayers to understand the extent of the issue.

This report outlines how to cut waste, streamline bureaucracy, change procurement and personnel rules, and create a more efficient and cost-effective government. Where the report recommends action, I will act. This includes eliminating 12% of the federal workforce, merging agencies like the FBI, DEA, and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, and closing hundreds of government offices outside of Washington. From day one, I committed to rooting out wasteful spending. We must systematically eliminate waste, even if it means cutting worthy programs we can't currently afford. While much action requires congressional approval, we don't need to wait. We've launched our campaign to cut waste independently because Congress hasn't acted enough. We will continue finding ways to cut waste, regardless of congressional action.

To understand Elon Musk's actions with the federal government, look at his Twitter takeover. He implemented cost-cutting measures: mass layoffs, reduced real estate, and employee buyouts—similar to a recent federal government email. This mirrors his "zero-based budgeting" approach. While Twitter's revenue decreased after these changes (partially due to an advertising boycott), its profitability increased significantly. Adjusted EBITDA rose from $682 million to $1.25 billion, even with reduced revenue. This demonstrates that eliminating unnecessary spending can increase profitability, leading to taxpayer savings and reduced government debt. Ignoring the negative narrative, Musk's methods could benefit the federal government, resulting in lower taxes and improved services for the American people.

In just under a month, the Department of Government Efficiency has already saved over $55 billion, and this is only the beginning. We're on track to eliminate trillions of dollars in waste, which will lead to significantly lower inflation and interest rates. This will also result in reduced payments on mortgages, credit cards, and car loans, and a much stronger stock market. I anticipate the stock market performing exceptionally well. Our strategy involves rapidly expanding the economy by significantly reducing the size of the federal government, and this is a crucial step we must take.

We need to reduce government size, particularly within the FBI, which has expanded unnecessarily. The FBI's intel operations have caused significant issues, and I would repurpose the Hoover building into a museum while reallocating its 7,000 employees to focus on law enforcement, tackling crime directly. Government reform is essential, and collaboration with Congress is necessary to eliminate redundant positions. During my time as deputy DNI, we identified and cut unnecessary roles, which Congress appreciated as it saved money. Agencies often request more positions without justification, leading to unfilled roles and wasted budgets. It's a misconception that agencies can't return unused funds; they often spend unnecessarily to avoid returning money to Congress.

The speaker credits the president for allowing Elon to bring in a team of young geniuses to analyze departments and cut spending. They reportedly identified $160 billion in potential annual administrative cuts. However, congressional approval is needed to implement these cuts. The speaker acknowledges that some Republicans are not in favor of the level of austerity required to enact these cuts.

We're streamlining the federal bureaucracy, aiming to reduce the workforce. We found a surprising bottleneck: the retirement process. Currently, the maximum number of retirements per month is capped at 10,000 due to a completely manual, paper-based system. The paperwork is stored in a 1950s-era limestone mine, and the speed of the mine shaft elevator limits processing. This antiquated system employs thousands of people whose efforts could be far better utilized elsewhere. The situation is absurd; we need to modernize this process immediately. Imagine the increased efficiency and contribution to the country's goods and services if these employees were redeployed.

The speaker credits the president for allowing Elon to bring in a team of young geniuses to analyze departments and cut spending. They reportedly identified $160 billion a year in administrative cuts. However, these cuts require congressional approval. The speaker acknowledges that some Republicans are soft on spending, making it difficult to achieve the desired austerity and cuts.

We anticipate significant reductions in federal agencies, including potential closures. Certain agencies may be eliminated entirely, and we plan to cut down on bloated areas within the federal government. Additionally, we aim to reduce spending on federal contractors who are overbilling. The changes may happen more swiftly than expected, thanks to the legal framework provided by the Supreme Court.

Speaker 1 confirms he will continue to help Trump if he is selected. He refers to a potential "government efficiency commission" or "Department of Government Efficiency," possibly called "Doge." Speaker 1 states that at Twitter, they cut about 80% of staff and improved the site's features more in the past year and a half than in the previous eight years. Speaker 1 suggests reviewing all federal agencies to determine if all 428 are necessary, noting there are more agencies than years since the US was founded. He believes they should reduce the number of agencies and eliminate overlapping responsibilities. He also advocates for reviewing regulations to remove those that are not sensible, as regulators tend to add more regulations every year. He anticipates needing a significant security team due to potential unpopularity and threats.

In under a month, the Department of Government Efficiency has already saved over $55 billion, and this is only the beginning. We're targeting trillions of dollars in waste, which will lead to significantly lower inflation and interest rates. This will also bring down payments on mortgages, credit cards, and car loans, while boosting the stock market. I believe the stock market is going to perform exceptionally well. Our strategy involves rapidly growing the economy by dramatically reducing the size of the federal government, a necessary step for our nation's prosperity.

The federal government isn't a company to dismantle like on Shark Tank; it must be run constitutionally, and the current administration is restoring services and jobs that have been disrupted. The government is fat and hasn't been scrutinized for a century. Finally, someone is willing to address the waste. However, cuts aren't deep enough. In private equity, when fixing a bankrupt company, you must cut severely and quickly, even 20% more than initially planned, then rehire to minimize trauma. There's so much waste in the federal government that needs addressing. You can't be surgically precise when auditing the government. You have to cut more because you don't know where all the waste is. We've never audited the government before.