reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Congestion pricing in New York City began on the 5th, imposing fees for vehicles entering Manhattan below 60th Street. The MTA aims to raise $15 billion for mass transit improvements. A resident expressed frustration over the $9 toll affecting his daily commute. Critics highlight that the pricing disproportionately impacts lower-income workers, with some facing an additional $200 monthly cost. Uber and Lyft lobbied for congestion pricing, benefiting from reduced competition. The low-income discount is deemed inadequate. The discussion raises concerns about class dynamics and the management of public resources, emphasizing the need for equitable transportation solutions.

Buses are a bureaucratic afterthought in a car culture, with only about 5% of Americans riding them and service arriving hourly. Buses are slow, averaging 7.9 mph, prompting a demonstration where a cross town bus was outpaced by a street crawler moving at 5.5 mph. Proposals for fast and free buses hinge on marked upgrades: more bus lanes, signal priority, and shorter stops. The point of free transit is to reduce congestion, make transport affordable for workers, and disproportionately help the poor, women, and others who bear costs. Support for free transit rests on funding questions. Kansas City's failed free bus program followed COVID relief money, while New York City faces a $600 million price tag. Advocates point to administrative savings from eliminating fare checks and argue higher taxes on wealth could cover the gap, noting fare revenue is a small share of budgets. The piece cites comparisons with the Staten Island Ferry, school buses, and a funded streetcar system, arguing that free, well-funded transit can be politically feasible and beneficial even for non-riders.

Dave Rubin announces a shift of the Friday Roundtable to Thursdays, welcoming guests John Cardillo and Spencer Claven. They discuss President Biden's apparent cognitive decline, suggesting that his inability to read a teleprompter reflects broader concerns about his leadership. Cardillo notes the Democrats' dilemma regarding Biden's replacement, while Claven emphasizes the seriousness of the situation, likening it to elder abuse. The conversation shifts to college campuses, where protests have erupted in support of Hamas, with Rubin criticizing the media's handling of anti-Semitism. They highlight the role of outside agitators and the failure of university administrations to maintain order. Cardillo expresses frustration with the NYPD's limitations under current leadership, while Claven argues that the far-left's tactics are destructive and rooted in a hatred of America and Israel. They also touch on the implications of progressive policies in cities like Los Angeles, where crime is rising amid calls to reduce prison populations. The hosts conclude that the consequences of such policies are dire, with cities like San Francisco serving as cautionary tales for the future.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the recent revelations about two alleged rapes at Stanford University that were later proven to be false claims. She questions why this story hasn't received more media attention and highlights the protests on campus demanding accountability from the university. Kelly also addresses comments made by second gentleman Doug Emhoff, who compared upset parents at school board meetings to the hatred that led to the Holocaust, suggesting that dissent over school policies is being equated with historical atrocities. The discussion shifts to the case of Jennifer Greece, a Stanford employee accused of fabricating the rape allegations. Greece has been charged with perjury and inducing false testimony after a lengthy investigation that cost the university $300,000. The hosts express skepticism about the initial claims, noting the lack of evidence and the unusual circumstances surrounding the allegations, including the fact that the same woman reported two separate incidents within a short time frame. Kelly and her guests criticize the campus response, which included increasing security measures that students protested against, arguing that the focus should be on actual safety rather than perceived biases. They discuss the broader implications of false accusations and the potential harm to legitimate victims of sexual assault. The conversation then moves to the state of free speech on college campuses, particularly at Stanford Law School, where students disrupted a speech by a conservative judge. The hosts lament the decline of open discourse in academic settings, comparing current student protests to historical movements that sought to silence opposing viewpoints. In a related segment, Kelly discusses the backlash against Robin DiAngelo and the anti-racism movement, noting that some activists are admitting that businesses are becoming wary of their messages. The hosts reflect on the changing landscape of corporate America regarding diversity and inclusion initiatives, suggesting that there is growing resistance to the extreme rhetoric associated with these movements. Finally, they touch on the topic of reparations in San Francisco, where a proposal for significant payments to Black residents has been put forward. The hosts express skepticism about the feasibility and fairness of such measures, questioning the criteria for eligibility and the broader implications for society. Throughout the episode, Kelly and her guests emphasize the importance of due process, the need for skepticism in allegations of misconduct, and the dangers of allowing narratives to overshadow facts in discussions about race and justice.

Megyn Kelly discusses two significant elections in California that could signal a shift in public sentiment against rising crime and homelessness. The primary race for Los Angeles Mayor features Democratic Congresswoman Karen Bass and billionaire developer Rick Caruso, who recently switched parties. The other critical election is the recall of San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin, a progressive known for his lenient policies towards crime, which have led to increased lawlessness in the city. Guests David Sacks and Jason Calacanis, both influential figures in Silicon Valley, have been active in the effort to recall Boudin. They highlight that Boudin's election in 2019 was facilitated by low voter turnout and ranked-choice voting, and since then, his policies have resulted in chaos, with many residents feeling unsafe. Sacks notes that recent polling indicates a strong likelihood of Boudin's recall, as many San Franciscans express dissatisfaction with his approach to crime. Calacanis addresses criticisms that the recall effort is driven by wealthy Silicon Valley elites, asserting that the movement is fundamentally about local voters wanting to reclaim safety in their communities. He emphasizes that the majority of San Francisco is Democratic, and the recall is a grassroots response to Boudin's failure to enforce laws effectively. Both guests recount specific incidents that have outraged the public, particularly within the Asian American community, where violent crimes against elderly individuals have gone unpunished under Boudin's administration. They argue that the progressive agenda of decarceration, which Boudin embodies, has led to a dangerous environment, with criminals not facing appropriate consequences for their actions. The discussion also touches on broader implications for California politics, suggesting that a successful recall could indicate a shift away from extreme progressive policies towards more moderate approaches. They express hope that this could lead to a more balanced political landscape in the state. As the conversation shifts to the national context, they discuss the influence of George Soros in funding progressive district attorneys across the country, which has contributed to a nationwide trend of leniency towards crime. The guests argue that this trend has disproportionately affected marginalized communities, contradicting the intended goals of social justice. The episode concludes with a focus on the economic implications of these political shifts, particularly in light of rising crime rates and public safety concerns, which could impact voter behavior in upcoming elections.

In this episode of the All In podcast, hosts Chamath Palihapitiya, Jason Calacanis, David Sacks, and David Friedberg discuss their recent controversial episode featuring Vlad Tenev from Robinhood. Chamath expresses his dissatisfaction with the content, feeling it lacked substance and was more of a PR stunt. The group debates the role of guests on the podcast, agreeing that they should focus on discussions rather than interviews, as they are not journalists but commentators. The conversation shifts to the political climate in San Francisco, particularly focusing on District Attorney Chesa Boudin. The hosts criticize Boudin's approach to criminal justice, arguing that his policies of decarceration have led to increased crime rates and repeat offenders being released without prosecution. They highlight specific cases, including recent violent incidents involving repeat offenders, attributing these issues to Boudin's failure to hold criminals accountable. The hosts also discuss the broader implications of Boudin's policies and the rise of similar approaches in other cities, such as Los Angeles. They express concern about the growing number of authoritarian regimes globally and the decline of democracies, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to criminal justice reform that includes accountability. The episode concludes with a discussion on the future of vaccinations in the U.S., with Friedberg noting that supply is not the issue but rather the distribution and policy surrounding vaccinations. The hosts express optimism about the potential for life to return to normal as vaccination efforts ramp up, while also addressing the psychological impact of the pandemic on people's willingness to return to pre-COVID activities. They end with a light-hearted discussion about future podcast plans and the importance of maintaining their unique voice.

On March 9, 2021, Dave Rubin discusses several pressing issues, starting with Joe Biden's apparent cognitive difficulties, highlighting his inability to remember names and locations, which he argues poses a national security risk. He criticizes mainstream media for not addressing these concerns, suggesting a reality disconnect for those only consuming traditional news sources. Rubin then critiques Don Lemon's commentary on racism within the British royal family, expressing concern over the dangerous implications of unchallenged accusations of racism. He also targets a New York Times piece on Senator Josh Hawley, arguing it unfairly relies on opinions from his past acquaintances rather than substantive evidence. Lastly, he addresses the closure of Walgreens in San Francisco due to rampant shoplifting, attributing it to lenient laws that treat theft under $950 as a misdemeanor, which he believes exacerbates crime and societal decay in progressive cities.