TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the media covers up violence by Antifa and ignores violence against Trump supporters. The speaker says that after a White House press briefing, they asked assembled journalists why they wouldn't cover violence against Trump supporters or demand that Democratic leaders disavow violence from Antifa, as they demanded of Trump regarding his supporters. The speaker states the journalists laughed at them, which the speaker took as proof that the media laughs at violence against people they don't like.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
24% of people who identify as very liberal think that political violence is acceptable. That number is only 3% for conservatives. That's not an American problem. That's a left wing problem. Yes, everybody should be able to condemn political violence. On the left and the right, I certainly do. But this is a problem that we're seeing predominantly from the left.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the concerns raised by Trump's critics, comparing them to the actions of the Biden Harris administration. They highlight the danger of labeling Trump as a modern-day Hitler and the implicit call for violence against him. The speaker argues that this message is alarming and goes against the principles of the United States. They criticize those in positions of power for abusing their authority and undermining democracy in their pursuit of their desired outcome.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the left has been trying to impose Marxism, socialism, and communism on Americans for generations. Unable to do so during the Cold War, the Democratic Party allegedly shifted tactics, using migration as a weapon to break down the middle class and gain political power. Migration is purportedly used to destroy public education, healthcare, wages, working conditions, and social cohesion, creating chaos that allows the left to advocate for more government control and import voters who do not believe in limited government or the Constitution. The speaker asserts that the Democratic Party is engaging in a violent insurrectionist revolt against ICE, with Democrat shock troops attacking ICE officers and border patrol, including assassination attempts. They claim the Democrat rhetoric, which calls ICE officers Nazis and demands ICE leave communities, inspires domestic terror attacks against law enforcement. The speaker believes the West is at a hinge point.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
One month ago today, I witnessed my friend of ten years, someone who I considered a brother, a loving husband, a devoted father, a generational leader, get assassinated on a livestream by a left wing radical. Approximately one year ago, I witnessed the president of The United States get shot in the head by a left wing radical who also took the life of a transporter in front of his daughters and wife. Two months ago, Christian children kneeling and praying in a church Were slaughtered. By a left wing extremist. If it's happening every single week, is it that extreme, or has the Democrat party mainstreamed violence as a political tool? Violence has been mainstreamed by the Democrat Party. It is not extremist. Is any Democrat courageous enough to disavow violence? The Trump administration making America safe again. God bless them.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker describes a "dirtbag coalition of leftist violent so called protest" as a growing problem, mentioning similarities to BLM, free Palestine, and other protest movements. Another speaker notes the lack of outrage from Democrats regarding the destruction, contrasting it with their outrage over ICE officials. Five figures—Karen Bass, Gavin Newsom, Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell, and Nancy Pelosi—are called out for allegedly attacking ICE officials instead of condemning the attacks. It is claimed this inaction from California officials amounts to "war" on federal agents. A speaker warns of a bad look if leaders don't intervene and stop the protests, especially with city leaders allegedly encouraging resistance.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
We are on Capitol Hill with helicopters flying around, a rare sight due to left-wing violence. The streets are closed off near the US Capitol, not for peaceful protests but to incite violence and target police. The Biden administration treats these violent left-wing groups differently than those involved in January 6. Charges like conspiracy, sedition, or insurrection are unlikely due to the administration's alliance with them. Unfortunately, we may see more violence from the left leading up to the election, supporting terrorists who harm Americans abroad.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses shock at the level of violence and hatred they perceive as coming from the left, questioning how it aligns with their claimed image of empathy. They cite examples such as burning Teslas, shooting up dealerships, and calls for the death of the president and themselves. The speaker states that while people have a right to not buy a product, they shouldn't resort to violence like burning it down, as it affects other people's property.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
At the core of the left, at the core of a liberal, is someone that would use the sword if they had it. They are very violent people at their core. They always have it. They can't debate. They can't have conversation. So they'll resort to these tactics. They're gonna do everything they possibly can to try to murder this movement because they can't beat us. So they're gonna try to take weapons. And now we're very aware of that. I'm aware of it. We have to have full time security. This is not a joke. This is who these people are.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
I wanna address this idea that both sides just need to lower the temperature. If you've been watching the news or scrolling on social media, you've probably heard this. Both sides just need to lower the temperature. It's bullshit, and I wanna point out exactly why it's bullshit. First, let's take a look at what these Democrat politicians are saying now that their side has committed many acts of domestic terrorism. They say: “Everybody, right, left, center, I don't care what your politics are, has to speak out strongly against it. But look, I think, and I don't know what's happened here, and I don't know about the guns, but we need better laws on guns.” Then: “I I I just don't even know why there aren't uprisings all over the country, and maybe there will be.” And: “There needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there's unrest in our lives. Enemies of the state.” They add: “Show me where it says that protests are supposed to be polite and peaceful.” They state: “There is no both sides in this. Okay? That is what the left has done over about the last week.” They list alleged incidents: “A leftist murdered Charlie Kirk. A leftist shot an ABC affiliate for not airing Jimmy Kimmel. Imagine shooting up a TV studio because Jimmy Kimmel was not being aired. Somebody on the left shot a wedding while yelling free Palestine. Leftists had mass celebrations and celebrated Charlie Kirk's murder in the streets of New York. And today, a leftist shot an ICE facility.” They conclude: “There is no both sides.” “The right is not the one doing this. The far left, the leftist organizers, activists, the people at the root of the Democratic Party are the ones behind this. They have an insane ideology, and they are making people pay for it in blood.”

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents a highly inflammatory, pro-immigration-enforcement narrative centered on recent unrest in Portland and Chicago, with broad claims about law enforcement, media, and politics. - In Portland, Kristi Noem, the secretary of homeland security, is described as visiting “Rip City,” inspecting what is framed as Antifa’s “mini confederacy,” and interacting with an undocumented migrant in a way likened to a dramatic arrest, with wording implying removal from the country. - The situation at protests is depicted as chaotic and violent, with ICE vans “busting through barricades” and targeting a fentanyl trafficker, a murder suspect, sex predators, and pedophiles “all iced in Oregon.” Protesters are accused of throwing rocks and using lasers and dye, while Democrats are described as saying it’s all “smoke and mirrors.” - Protesters are described as peaceful on the surface but with videographers behind them to create a perception of chaos; a tone is set that the media is biased, and there is contempt for mainstream outlets, including a claim that “Legacy Media doesn’t have any reporters filming the riots.” - Chief Bob Day is introduced as a police chief who is also a DEI consultant, previously working for a DEI nonprofit, and accused of coaching Antifa to avoid arrest. The narrative suggests that Day prioritizes positive media coverage and that his actions reflect a broader strategy to reimagine policing. - The piece asserts a strained relationship between people of color, police, and a broader social order, with speakers claiming that bias and racism within policing have not been adequately addressed and that challenges will increase unless something changes. - There are repeated claims that Antifa is attacking immigration officers for an extended period, while Portland is described as aiding Antifa and resisting ICE. A meeting between Kristi Noem and Bob Day is described as unfavorable to law enforcement, with Day allegedly dissatisfied by the outcome. - Chicago is portrayed similarly: federal agents’ operations are described as being hampered by a stand-down order, with a female rioter who allegedly doxxed ICE agents and rammed a car later described as extremely dangerous; prosecutors reportedly characterize the individual as dangerous, while the left is accused of prioritizing “micro confederacies” to protect alleged criminals. - The transcript ties these events to political figures and themes: mentioning Mayor Johnson and “no ICE zones,” referencing violent crime, and portraying actions by Democrats and certain judges as lenient toward criminals. A Latin King calls for a $10,000 hit on a border patrol commander. - There is a recurring narrative about the 2024-2025 political climate: immigration, crime, media bias, and political power. Claims include that illegal crossings have declined to the lowest level since 1970, that the FBI has arrested thousands in crime sweeps, and that political operatives hope to deploy troops to polling places to “protect the vote.” - The piece ends with criticisms of Kristi Noem and others, accusing them of sensationalism and of inciting actions, and portraying discussions about immigration and policing as deeply adversarial, with calls for stronger enforcement and political maneuvering to influence elections.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they have never promoted violence, but have also never excused violent actors, such as those involved in January 6th. The speaker suggests Pam Bondi should address terrorism with her boss regarding the release of January 6th participants.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker claims, "Brother Charlie got murdered, assassinated a few days ago, but the truth is he was assassinated a few years ago." They argue that electing people who demonize their political opponents leads to violence, adding, "So you might have pulled the trigger yourself." The speaker asks, "Who demonize political opponents? Who call political opponents enemies, Hitler, a threat to democracy, who say because we disagree, if you see someone, walk up to them and if they're eating in a restaurant, tell them they're not welcome, get in their face." They warn, "When you start saying stuff like that, calling your political opponents Nazis, fascists, stuff like that. Well, sooner or later, a kook is gonna hear that. A crazy person is going to hear that, and they're going to act on it."

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The dialogue centers on extreme political hostility and radicalization. A speaker advocates violent intimidation against political opponents, suggesting they should be exposed and harmed. He notes there was a “layup” against Herschel Walker, while acknowledging Walker was “prepared very well” and arguing to attract younger viewers on TikTok. A second participant counters by labeling the tactic as “shock” and mentions a Florida opportunity to earn $100,000. Messages left at a candidate’s office are described as threats of violence. The discussion also touches Berkeley housing, suggesting property owners withhold rentals from the poor. The segment closes with explicit calls to violent action against opponents, including killing and murder, and a provocative reference to “red capitalist blood.”

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
A sign in Williamsburg, Brooklyn reads "Who will kill Elon?" The speaker believes this is a serious threat. They claim that a "kill Biden" sign would provoke outrage from the left. The speaker states that this situation is "sick."

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The left has been trying to impose Marxism, socialism, and communism on Americans for generations, but shifted tactics after the Cold War. The Democratic Party now uses migration to break down the middle class and gain political power by destroying public education, healthcare, wages, working conditions, and social cohesion. This creates chaos that allows them to argue for more government control, redistribution, and power, importing voters who don't believe in limited government or the Constitution to support this agenda. The speaker claims the Democratic Party is engaging in a violent insurrectionist revolt against ICE, with Democrat shock troops attacking ICE officers and border patrol, including assassination attempts. They accuse Democrat rhetoric of inciting domestic terror attacks against law enforcement. President Trump won a mandate to empower ICE and Border Patrol, enforce laws, and remove illegal aliens, and is delivering on that mandate. The speaker calls for patriotic Americans to support ICE, Border Patrol, and President Trump.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses the severity of threats and the dangers of vigilantism. They note that someone has been arrested for threatening them with terrorist threats, underscoring that it is no joke to be in the DOJ at this time. In discussing aggressive actions against law enforcement, the speaker highlights a scenario where someone breaks into a car of a law enforcement official and then uses information found inside to dox people and publish their home addresses. They emphasize that this action is not limited to targeting the ICE agent alone; it extends to the agent’s family, including the children, the wife, and the husband, highlighting the broader, more serious impact of such conduct. The speaker characterizes this behavior as a very serious matter. They warn that if someone believes they can operate as a renegade militia to police ICE, that person may spend many years in prison for doing so, labeling such a stance as a bad idea. The message clearly rejects vigilantism as a method of protest. The speaker asserts that protest is legitimate and notes their own history of protesting, framing protests as acceptable when conducted through proper channels. However, they insist that breaking into cars, doxxing individuals, and publishing home addresses are not acceptable forms of protest. The conclusion of the statement urges consideration of different, lawful approaches to expression and dissent. The speaker urges others to think of other ways to protest, emphasizing that the approach described—vigilante actions against ICE and doxxing—does not constitute an appropriate form of protest. The overall message is a strong warning against taking the law into one’s own hands and a call to pursue protests through lawful, nonviolent, and constructive means.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the hatred and violence they perceive from Trump supporters. Speaker 1 claims that Trump supporters hit people, throw urine, and use crowbars. Speaker 0 expresses doubt but acknowledges the possibility of milkshake incidents. Speaker 1 questions if Trump supporters would engage in such behavior, to which Speaker 0 responds that they hope not. Speaker 1 then suggests that Democrats and liberals are actually responsible for these actions. Speaker 0 disagrees, stating that the average Democrat does not support violence. The conversation continues with Speaker 1 mentioning incidents at a Trump rally and accusing liberals of stealing and burning red hats. Speaker 0 dismisses these claims as an attempt to push an agenda. The video ends with Speaker 1 questioning Speaker 0's support for multiple candidates.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker: The Democrat party has become dangerously, violently radicalized. And you're right, Sean. I get death threats every day. My wife gets death threats every day. We've obviously had to deal with pretty extensive doxing campaigns. But the truth is, Sean, that people across the country, across the government, across law enforcement who are fighting for safety, security, prosperity are dealing with radical left communist threats and attacks all day long. And President Trump, of course, came within inches sorry, centimeters of A millimeter. Assassinated one millimeter. On during the middle of his rally on live television by a wicked evil assassin and then only weeks later, a second assassin, if not for a secret service agent spotting the burial of that gun, would have taken president Trump's life, saved by the by the hand of God himself. We are dealing with a party that is so extreme that considers its opponents to be its mortal enemies, that dehumanizes its opposition, that justifies violent attacks against federal law enforcement, assaults against ICE and border patrol that sides over and over again with criminal aliens, MS 13 gang bangers. Look at how they look at how they venerated and worshipped and praised the MS 13 child smuggler that they dubbed the Maryland dad, somebody who beat his wife and smuggled children and was a member of a terrorist organization and they held him up as their hero. This is a dangerous party. This is a dangerous movement. And when you're singing New York City with Mamdani, that is the future. A party that believes in no bail, a party believes in no jail, a party that believes in no borders, but here's one group they do wanna put in jail, their political enemies.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the individuals committing violence are distinct from those peacefully protesting immigration enforcement. These violent individuals are hooded, masked, and move from one civil unrest situation to another, employing similar tactics. The speaker alleges these individuals are connected, often labeled anarchists, and travel from city to city to instigate harm and chaos. The speaker finds it disgusting that many of these people come from other places just to hurt people and to cause havoc.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that "lunatic liberals" and Democrats are destroying and vandalizing Tesla dealerships, harassing Tesla drivers, and inciting violence, but the media is not asking Democrats to denounce these actions, unlike how Republicans were questioned about January 6th. The speaker demands arrests and examples be made of these "radical lunatic terrorists," including Pam Bundy, Cash Patel, Brandon Johnson, and Pritzker, for inciting violence. They contrast the media's portrayal of Trump supporters with the alleged lack of coverage of these actions. The speaker insists that these individuals must be held accountable for their "terrorist attacks" on American companies and citizens, warning that someone will get hurt. They thank Elon Musk and Donald Trump for their work.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
"Do you accept, Carrie, that this is a it's not just a one-sided problem? The political violence and violent rhetoric is a problem on both sides of the divide, and it's incumbent on everybody in a position of authority and influence to take the lead here in trying to to just tone things down." "There's been a few cases where it goes from from the right to the left, but there's been an exorbitant number where it's coming from the left to the right. And you can't deny that. If you add it all up, it's just more violence. I mean, president Trump was nearly assassinated. There's another attempt on his life." "The media has to take credit for what they have caused, the chaos they've caused in our country, and they haven't done it. And until they do, they need to be turned off, canceled, muted. They're absolutely abhorrent."

The Rubin Report

‘Real Time’ Crowd Roars for Bill Maher Pointing out Hypocrisy of Protesters
reSee.it Podcast Summary
Dave Rubin discusses current events, starting with Bill Maher's perspective on a group of people in furry costumes protesting against a perceived 'king' figure, which Rubin believes is a coordinated leftist effort to undermine the American government. Rubin critiques Maher for not recognizing the threat clearly, pointing out the hypocrisy of Democrats and socialists protesting against a king while seemingly supporting violence and unrest. He contrasts this with Maher's accurate observation of the hypocrisy of those who protested Israeli actions in Gaza but remained silent on Hamas's violence against Palestinians. Rubin then presents footage from a 'No Kings' rally, highlighting a public school teacher who made violent gestures towards a car with a Charlie Kirk placard. He argues that while people have the right to protest, these individuals are misguided and potentially instigating violence. He shares a clip of a woman at the rally expressing hateful sentiments towards Charlie Kirk, drawing a parallel to Hitler's death. Rubin criticizes the mainstream media, particularly NBC and MSNBC, for their biased coverage and older viewership, which he believes contributes to the brainwashing of people who participate in these protests. He also shows a clip of a person in a unicorn costume expressing joy and community spirit at the rally, which Rubin dismisses as absurd. The podcast transitions to a discussion about Perplexity AI's new web browser, Comet, which automates online tasks. Rubin then criticizes Bernie Sanders for his class warfare rhetoric against billionaires like Elon Musk, highlighting Musk's contributions to free speech, infrastructure, and space exploration. He contrasts Sanders' attacks on Musk with his silence on George Soros and points out Sanders' hypocrisy as a millionaire with multiple houses. Rubin also shows a clip of Nancy Pelosi tearing up an imaginary crown, mocking her actions as performative and disconnected from reality. He presents an image of the sponsors of the 'No Kings' Rally, suggesting that these protests are not organic but rather well-funded and coordinated efforts. Speaker Mike Johnson discusses the 'No Kings' rallies, calling them 'Hate America rallies' and highlighting the irony of protesting against a king while benefiting from the freedoms and openness provided by the Trump administration. Rubin then promotes Cove Pure, a water purifier that removes fluoride and other contaminants. He returns to criticizing the mainstream media, particularly The View, for their biased coverage of the protests and their double standards compared to their coverage of January 6th. He plays a clip of a Democrat strategist suggesting that Trump supporters are trying to provoke violence to invoke the Insurrection Act, which Rubin dismisses as baseless. Rubin shares a disturbing clip of a man in Chicago calling for violence against ICE agents, contrasting it with the Democrats' push to unmask ICE agents. He expresses concern about the increasing normalization of violence and hatred, particularly towards conservatives. He then plays a clip of a man downplaying the concerns about the protests, which Rubin dismisses as absurd. Rubin plays a clip of Donald Trump discussing the FBI's involvement in the January 6th events, suggesting that government instigation may have played a role. The podcast shifts to a discussion about the upcoming mayoral election in New York City, focusing on the rise of socialist candidate Zorhan Mami. Rubin shares a clip of Bill Maher warning about the dangers of socialism and the potential destruction of New York City under Mami's leadership. He criticizes Mami's policies, such as raising taxes on the wealthy and corporations, which he believes will drive businesses and residents out of the city. Rubin also shares a clip of Mami questioning Andrew Cuomo's lack of engagement with the Muslim community, which Rubin sees as a veiled attempt to impose Sharia law. He plays an undercover video of one of Mami's canvassing directors expressing disdain for the New York City Police Department. Mark Cuban defends Mami's political skills, arguing that he is effective at selling his message and using social media to appeal to younger voters. Rubin acknowledges Cuban's point but argues that Mami's message is ultimately gibberish that will destroy New York City. He plays a song from 1972 by Adriano Selentano, which was nonsensical but packaged to sound like English, as an analogy for Mami's political appeal. Rubin concludes by highlighting Donald Trump's efforts to save lives and end wars, contrasting him with the protesters and the media who portray him as a king. He encourages listeners to get involved in fighting for what is right and true, drawing inspiration from Michael Jordan's success despite numerous failures.

The Megyn Kelly Show

Karine Jean-Pierre Undermines Her Book, "No Kings" Ghouls, and Wind Farm Danger, w/ Burguiere & More
reSee.it Podcast Summary
The podcast begins with Megyn Kelly and Stu Burguiere sharply criticizing White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre's book tour, accusing her of relying on identity politics and being dishonest about her book's content and President Biden's mental acuity. They mock her attempts to portray her book's criticism of a "broken White House" as referring to the Trump administration, despite her not having served in it. Kelly and Burguiere argue that Jean-Pierre's public statements lack substance, often devolving into self-identification rather than factual communication, and that she is uniquely unqualified for her role as a spokesperson. The discussion then shifts to "No Kings rallies," where the hosts highlight what they describe as violent rhetoric and death wishes from left-wing protesters directed at conservatives like Charlie Kirk and former President Donald Trump. They present videos and accounts of protesters celebrating Kirk's alleged murder and expressing desires for harm against Trump, including a Chicago public school teacher who mocked Kirk's death. Kelly expresses deep disturbance over the widespread nature of these sentiments and calls for accountability, particularly for individuals in positions of trust like teachers. A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to an investigative report on offshore wind farms, featuring a special correspondent, Molly Moran, and Congressman Jeff Van Drew. They detail the negative impacts of these wind turbines, including their role in the deaths of endangered North Atlantic right whales due to constant sonar noise and turbulence, harm to other wildlife (birds), aesthetic degradation of coastlines, and the environmental challenge of disposing of toxic, non-recyclable blades. The hosts praise President Trump for halting new wind projects and revoking permits, contrasting his actions with the Biden administration's promotion of what they deem an inefficient and environmentally damaging energy source. Finally, the hosts touch upon the ongoing government shutdown, citing CNN's Harry Enten's analysis that public blame is not falling on Donald Trump as it did in previous shutdowns, suggesting a potential end to the stalemate. They also discuss the concept of "lawfare" and the perceived weaponization of the justice system against political opponents, with Joe Scarborough's warnings about setting precedents being ironically applied to current events. The episode concludes with a strong critique of what they see as the Democratic party's misguided policies and rhetoric, particularly concerning energy and identity.

The Megyn Kelly Show

Vile "No Kings" Protests, Hilarious Anti-Trump Boomers, and KJP Begins Book Tour, w/ Emily Jashinsky
Guests: Emily Jashinsky
reSee.it Podcast Summary
Megyn Kelly and Emily Jashinsky discuss the disturbing trend of leftist protesters expressing violent fantasies and hatred towards conservatives, particularly focusing on incidents following a 'No Kings' protest. Kelly presents numerous examples of protesters wishing death upon President Trump, his family, and other prominent conservatives like Charlie Kirk and Steven Miller. The discussion highlights a perceived double standard in media coverage, where similar expressions of hatred from the right would be heavily scrutinized and condemned, while leftist extremism is often downplayed or ignored. The conversation delves into specific instances of alarming behavior, including a child being encouraged to stab an effigy of President Trump, protesters celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and individuals expressing a desire for violence against ICE agents. Kelly and Jashinsky criticize the mainstream media for failing to adequately cover these incidents and for often portraying leftist protests as peaceful and joyful, despite evidence to the contrary. They argue that this biased coverage contributes to a dangerous polarization and creates a climate where political violence becomes normalized. Jashinsky draws a parallel to the Tea Party era, noting that any similar displays of extremism at conservative rallies would have been met with widespread condemnation and used to discredit the entire movement. They discuss the challenges of engaging with individuals who hold such extreme views and the importance of defeating them electorally. The conversation also touches on the role of education and the influence of leftist ideology in schools, which they believe contributes to the radicalization of young people. The discussion shifts to Karine Jean-Pierre's new book and her claim of leaving the Democratic Party due to its treatment of Joe Biden. Kelly and Jashinsky express skepticism, pointing out Jean-Pierre's unwavering support for Biden and her history of defending his administration. They criticize her attempt to portray herself as an independent voice, arguing that her views are still firmly aligned with the Democratic Party. The segment concludes with a broader critique of the mainstream media's bias and its role in perpetuating political division.
View Full Interactive Feed