reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Pharmaceutical giants like GSK, Sanofi, Novartis, and Baxter have been given the green light by the WHO to sell millions of vaccines, resulting in billions of euros in revenue. However, concerns have been raised about the WHO's handling of the pandemic. The organization is accused of easily declaring a pandemic by changing the definition, removing the criteria of a high number of cases and deaths. This change has allowed the pharmaceutical companies to profit from the situation. It is revealed that contracts for vaccines were signed between wealthy countries and the companies in 2005, with the condition that the WHO declares a pandemic. Furthermore, conflicts of interest are highlighted, as many experts advising the WHO also work for these pharmaceutical companies. The race for vaccine production is now underway.

They hijacked the Canadian healthcare system through agile regulations, pre-marketing campaigns, media influence, and funding experts. Nassy, responsible for immunization approval, received millions in research funding, potentially compromising their objectivity. The head of Nassy got $2.6 million when the pandemic started, then $10 million later. Another Nassy co-chair received $3.5 million to promote vaccine readiness before their effectiveness was known.

The pandemic created 40 new big pharma billionaires. Companies like Moderna and Pfizer profited $1,000 per second from the COVID vaccine. Over 2/3 of congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies in 2020. Pfizer made $100 billion in profit in 2022, funded by the public. The system benefits from crises, leading to perpetual emergencies for ordinary people, separate from the elite's interests.

A biopharmaceutical complex has formed, with various organizations and individuals colluding to take advantage of medical emergencies. They meet in Davos, Switzerland and have realized that during a crisis, governments will pour money into the complex. The complex includes the World Health Organization, Gates Foundation, Welcome Trust, Rockefeller Foundation, UN, Gavi, UNITATE, CEPI, and regulatory agencies like the FDA and CDC. Key figures like Scott Gottlieb and Steven Hahn are involved, with Gottlieb now on Pfizer's board and Hahn supporting Moderna. Even high-ranking officials like Deborah Birx have joined biotech companies. The Gates Foundation's investment in BioNTech yielded massive returns. Overall, it's a money-driven operation.

The pandemic created at least 40 new big pharma billionaires. Pharmaceutical corporations like Moderna and Pfizer made a $1,000 of profit every second from the COVID-19 vaccine. More than 2/3 of Congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies in the 2020 election. Pfizer chairman Albert Bourla told Time Magazine in July 2020 that his company was developing a COVID vaccine for the good of humanity, not for money; Pfizer made $100 billion in profit in 2022. The American public funded the development of the Pfizer vaccine, and the German public funded the BioNTech vaccine. It is possible that these reading capitalists made a lot of money, and also there are a lot of people who did need the vaccine and would be dead without it. If you have an economic system in which pharmaceutical companies benefit hugely from medical emergencies, where a military industrial complex benefits from war, where energy companies benefit from energy crisis, you are going to generate states of perpetual crisis for the interest of ordinary people, separate from the interest of the elite.

The Gates Foundation was established after an undisclosed settlement for antitrust violations by Microsoft. It started funding the World Health Organization, along with other major foundations. These foundations formed the global preparedness monitoring board, including members from Gates Foundation, NIAID, and Wellcome Trust. This collaboration raises questions about who the FDA and CDC were truly taking orders from, hinting at a criminal conspiracy involving antitrust violations and racketeering.

A biopharmaceutical complex, consisting of organizations like the World Health Organization, Gates Foundation, and Rockefeller Foundation, has formed a syndicate to exploit medical emergencies for financial gain. They meet in Davos, Switzerland, and have the support of regulatory agencies worldwide. The complex invests in itself, colludes with others, and rewards them with future jobs. Examples include Scott Gottlieb, former FDA commissioner now on Pfizer's board, and Deborah Birx, who went from being a public health official to CEO of a biotech company. The Gates Foundation's investment in BioNTech yielded massive returns. This complex operates for profit.

The pandemic created numerous new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry, with companies like Moderna and Pfizer making massive profits from the COVID-19 vaccine. Many members of Congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies. Pfizer's chairman claimed they developed the vaccine for the benefit of humanity, but the company still made a staggering $100 billion in profit. This raises questions about an economic system where pharmaceutical companies profit from emergencies, similar to how the military-industrial complex benefits from war and energy companies benefit from energy crises. Such a system perpetuates states of crisis, prioritizing the interests of the elite over ordinary people.

The Chinese lab in Wuhan is linked to GlaxoSmithKline, which owns Pfizer. Dr. Fauci funded the lab, promoting the vaccine. BlackRock manages GlaxoSmithKline, which is tied to Soros Foundation. Soros owns companies involved in Wuhan lab. Allianz, with Vanguard as a shareholder, is connected. BlackRock, controlling central banks, has ties to Microsoft, owned by Bill Gates. Gates is linked to BioNTech and Pfizer, sponsors of WHO. A bat in Wuhan led to a global outbreak.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is claimed to be a criminal racketeering organization violating the Sherman and Clayton Acts due to interlocking directorates, racketeering, market domination, and market controls. Since 1953, the WHO has allegedly been a vaccine-promoting enterprise benefiting those with commercial interests in vaccines. The Rockefeller Foundation and the Welcome Trust funded the WHO's establishment, allegedly not for information sharing, but to force drugs onto countries, including the dumping of drugs from Germany, the UK, and the US. While monitoring health conditions globally is important, the speaker argues that a financially disinterested party should make these determinations. The claim is that those with a financial incentive to declare a pandemic will collect data to justify their existence. The speaker asserts that the same group of people from the Eugenics office at Carnegie Mellon in 1913 established the World Health Organization in 1953 and are making these decisions.

The WHO's role seems to be disadvantageous in both cases. It operates within a complex biopharmaceutical syndicate that has formed over time. This syndicate includes the WHO, the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, the Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, Gavi, SEPI, Innovation, the Gates Foundation, and the WAF, most of which were established by the US State Department, the National Institutes of Health, the CDC, the FDA, the MHRA in the UK, the TGA in Australia, SAFRA in South Africa, and the EMA in Europe. This collaboration of non-governmental organizations and state health authorities works as a unified entity, but the outcomes have been negative.

The Chinese lab in Wuhan is linked to GlaxoSmithKline, owned by Pfizer. BlackRock manages GlaxoSmithKline and is tied to Soros, who owns Wintershall, the lab builder. Allianz bought Wintershall and has BlackRock as a shareholder. BlackRock also owns a share of Microsoft, linked to Bill Gates, a Pfizer shareholder and WHO sponsor. This shows how a bat in China led to a global pandemic.

The transcript presents a critical examination of Bill Gates, portraying him as transforming from a software magnate into a global health power broker whose wealth and influence have reshaped public health, vaccine development, and population policy. It argues that Gates’ philanthropic activities are not purely charitable but are deployed to extend control over health systems, global research agendas, and even the reproductive choices of people worldwide. Key claims and points are detailed across several strands: - Public image and power shift: Bill Gates is described as no longer a “public health expert” yet becoming a central figure in billions of lives, guiding medical actions and vaccine strategies. The program asserts that Gates’ reinvention through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been aided by a sophisticated public relations apparatus and by directing media coverage of global health issues. - Foundation scale and reach: The Gates Foundation is depicted as the world’s largest private foundation, with assets reported as tens of billions of dollars and a broad remit in global health, development, growth, and policy advocacy. Its influence extends to funding media outlets, think tanks, and reporting units across multiple outlets (BBC, NPR, Our World in Data, ABC, among others), creating what the program calls “tentacles” across global health. - Partnerships and funding of global health initiatives: Gates is credited with initiating and funding major global health vehicles, including: - Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, with seed funding and ongoing commitments that have shaped vaccination markets. - The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and other public-private partnerships that coordinate vaccine development and immunization programs. - Support for CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations), the World Health Organization’s vaccine initiatives, and other pandemic preparedness efforts. - The World Health Organization’s funding profile, described as heavily dependent on Gates Foundation support, with Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus noted as a non-medical doctor connected to Gates-backed initiatives. - The “Decade of Vaccines” and vaccine policy: Gates is credited with launching a decade-long vaccine initiative, including a pledge of billions of dollars to vaccine development and distribution. This is linked to the creation of a global vaccine action plan and to Gavi’s role in establishing vaccine markets. The narrative asserts that vaccines have been used to steer global health policy and to secure roles for private firms in public health decision-making. - Vaccine development concerns: The program raises concerns about the safety and speed of vaccine development, criticizing the eighteen-month timeline Gates advocates for a universal vaccine, and questioning the use of new technologies (DNA and mRNA platforms) and rapid deployment with limited testing. It highlights potential safety risks, including historical vaccine-associated disease enhancement and concerns about broad immunization in a short period. - Vaccine safety and regulation: It is claimed that vaccine safety at scale is hard to guarantee and that liability protections for vaccine makers and public health officials have been enacted (e.g., a U.S. declaration granting liability immunity for COVID-19 countermeasures), a point framed as enabling risk-bearing without accountability. - Population control framing: A central thread is the assertion that Gates seeks to reduce population growth through health improvements, vaccines, and reproductive health services. The transcript traces Gates’ interest in contraception and population issues to his family background and to Rockefeller-era eugenics historical contexts, arguing that discussions about fertility, contraceptive technologies, and demographic trends have long-term population implications. It cites specific Gates Foundation activities in reproductive health, including funding for innovative birth-control delivery methods, depot injections, implanted devices, and efforts to develop digital identity tied to health services as tools within a broader population-control framework. - Digital identity and biometric ID: The narrative emphasizes Gates’ involvement with biometric identification through Gavi and ID2020, noting partnerships with Microsoft and the Rockefeller Foundation, the Aadhaar system in India, and the World Bank’s ID4D initiative. It argues that vaccination programs, biometric identity, and cashless payments are being integrated into a comprehensive “population control grid,” enabling state and private actors to track, truncate, or deny access to services based on identity and health status. - Data, surveillance, and privacy concerns: The piece contends that the push for digital IDs, digital health records, and biometrics will erode privacy and enable broad government and corporate surveillance, linking health data to financial services, voting, housing, and welfare. It highlights projects involving digital certificates, immunity passports, and real-time health data collection via microneedle patches and barcode-like skin markers, suggesting these innovations could be used to control access to services. - Epstein connections and broader conspiracy context: The program references alleged connections between Gates and Jeffrey Epstein, including flight logs and involvement in philanthropic funding discussions, framing these ties as part of a broader pattern of influence. It also points to prior associations with notable figures (Buffett, Rockefeller, Soros) and critiques of Gates as aligning with a “population control” ideology. - The underlying motive and conclusion: Throughout, the narrative asserts that Gates’ wealth is being used not for charity alone but to build an overarching system of control—over health institutions, research funding, public policy, identification, and financial systems. It contrasts his public image as a generous philanthropist with alleged hidden agendas, suggesting that the real aim is to shape global governance and human behavior through vaccination, identification, and digital infrastructure. - Final framing and call to action: The closing sections urge viewers to recognize Gates’ influence as part of an ideology rather than a single person’s plan. It frames the situation as a broader movement that could continue beyond Gates personally, urging awareness and action to resist what the program deems a population-control regime embedded in global health and digital identity initiatives. In sum, the transcript portrays Bill Gates as a central figure driving a multifaceted, globally interconnected program—through the Gates Foundation, Gavi, CEPI, and related partnerships—that allegedly reconfigures vaccine policy, global health governance, reproductive health, biometric identification, and digital payments into a cohesive system of population control and surveillance, using philanthropy as a veneer for power and control.

Speaker 0 argues that the world has been lied to for 110 years by a small group of criminal industrial conspirators who aim to subjugate humanity to enrich themselves, impoverish and kill others, and that the words “acceptable death rate” have become an industrial norm. They claim this is not just a political disagreement but a crime, asserting that the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies authorized to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. The speaker declares this is a criminal cartel and states they will show documents proving it, insisting this is not an allegation but something that is provable by their own words. The four-step process alleged for executing nefarious plans is: 1) they begin by planning an exercise, 2) they fund that exercise, 3) they create the rationale for what they will do, and 4) they deploy and profit from it. They claim this violates 15 U.S. code section 19 (and connect it to the Clayton Act and the early formation of WHO in 1947), and they claim violation of the TFEU (the treaty for the functioning of the European Union), asserting Article 101 sets out that this was never public health but racketeering to instill terror to adapt population behavior. Data from Zurich is used to argue there was no pandemic: the speaker notes that during the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance claims fell by $30,000,000,000, stating that the data is unambiguous and that there was genocide rather than a pandemic. They pivot to the 2011 WHO, Welcome Trust, PATH, and Gates Foundation malaria vaccine program for children under six months, highlighting that 66 children in the vaccine group were murdered and 28 in the control group were murdered, with the control described as a cocktail of pathogenic injections rather than saline. The speaker references Article five, section 13, claiming immunity from arrest or legal process was designed as permanent immunity for a criminal organization formed in 1947; they connect the first WHO director general, Renee Sand (sic) from the Dachau-era milieu, to Brock Chisholm, who allegedly advocated population control as a primary objective. The claim extends to funding and influence: Gates Foundation allegedly provides 88% of WHO’s foundation donations, which the speaker says constitutes a tax and competition law violation in Europe and the United States. The four-step process is illustrated again with sourcing: to sustain funding beyond the crisis, to increase public understanding for medical countermeasures like pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccines, and to use media hype to attract investors who see profit at the end of the process, as documented by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and Peter Daszak’s partnerships. The 2014 Rand Paul–Anthony Fauci correspondence is cited, showing a letter from NIAID to UNC Chapel Hill stating that gain-of-function research would continue during a moratorium with a budget funded by DARPA and NIH. The speaker quotes that the Wuhan virus was anticipated, citing a 2016 publication stating SARS-like Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one is poised for human emergence, implying foreknowledge and manipulation of the virus in Wuhan and UNC Chapel Hill. The talk shifts to the characterization of the work as biological warfare enabling technologies, referencing Ralph Baric’s 2005 DARPA/MITRE presentation and subsequent NIAID and DARPA funding, concluding that the project was to produce biological warfare enabling technologies rather than public health measures. They highlight substantial profits for Pfizer and Moderna from public funds and accuse the WHO of laundering money via a budget expansion request of 11%. In closing, the speaker maintains this is not a public health crime or constitutional crime, but a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers. They call for ending the criminal organization itself and urge everyone to destroy the WHO.

A small group of conspirators has manipulated global health organizations for profit, leading to widespread harm. The World Health Organization (WHO) has operated as a criminal cartel since its inception, prioritizing control and profit over public health. They employ a four-step process: planning, funding, creating rationale, and profiting from their actions. Evidence suggests that the WHO and its partners have engaged in unethical practices, including harmful vaccine trials. The funding structure, heavily reliant on the Gates Foundation, raises legal concerns. The narrative surrounding pandemics has been manipulated to instill fear and drive acceptance of vaccines. This situation is characterized as organized crime, requiring a reevaluation of the WHO's role and a call for its dismantlement rather than mere reform. The focus should be on addressing the criminal actions rather than debating public health measures.

The Gates Foundation was formed after Microsoft's antitrust violations settlement. It funneled money to the World Health Organization, influencing its actions. The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board was created with members from Gates Foundation, NIAID, and others. The WHO's funding is mostly from Gates, giving them control. This violates Swiss law. The agenda includes population control, with statements about reducing the global population through vaccinations.

Vanguard Group, a major Pfizer shareholder, has connections to various entities like CCP, Black Stone, and Bill Gates. They control key technologies like Graphene, crucial for medicine ingredients. These powerful families manipulate drug prices, influence medical decisions, and profit from pharmaceutical companies, impacting global health and economy. Their control extends to governments and medical experts, shaping healthcare policies and treatments.

A biopharmaceutical complex, consisting of organizations like the World Health Organization, Gates Foundation, and Rockefeller Foundation, has formed a syndicate. They have been meeting in Davos, Switzerland for years, realizing that during a medical emergency, governments will pour money into the complex. The complex invests in itself, colluding with anyone necessary and rewarding them with future jobs. Regulatory agencies like the FDA and CDC are part of this complex. Notable figures like Scott Gottlieb and Deborah Birx are involved, with connections to Pfizer and Moderna, respectively. The Gates Foundation's investment in BioNTech yielded a massive return. This complex is currently experiencing a financial boom.

Lons seems to play a negative role in two areas. It operates within a complex biopharmaceutical syndicate that has formed over time. This syndicate includes various organizations like the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, the Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Welcome Trust, Gavi, SEPI, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, and more. These NGOs and government health agencies work together as a coordinated unit. However, their impact has been detrimental.

The pandemic has led to the emergence of 14 new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry. Companies like Moderna and Pfizer made massive profits from the COVID-19 vaccine, earning $1,000 per second. In the 2020 election, over two-thirds of Congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies. Despite Pfizer's chairman claiming their vaccine was developed for the good of humanity, the company still made a staggering $100 billion in profit in 2022. This economic system benefits pharmaceutical, military, and energy companies, creating perpetual crises for ordinary people.

The pandemic created 40 new big pharma billionaires. Companies like Moderna and Pfizer profited $1,000 per second from the COVID vaccine. Over 2/3 of congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies in 2020. Pfizer's chairman mentioned developing the vaccine for humanity, not money, but the company made $100 billion in profit. The public funded the vaccine development, but companies took the profits. The system benefits from crises like medical emergencies, war, and energy crises, leading to perpetual crises for ordinary people's interests. Industries profit from these crises, like the COVID testing industry.

Welcome to Liberty Talk Canada. Bill Gates has been linked to COVID-19 vaccine preparations before the pandemic was officially declared. Through a Freedom of Information request, emails reveal that Gates' foundation was already discussing vaccine development with BioNTech's CEO in early February 2020, even before the WHO labeled it a pandemic in March. The Gates Foundation had also invested in BioNTech in September 2019, suggesting prior knowledge of the virus. Additionally, an email from March 2020 indicated that NIH officials were more concerned about market sentiment regarding vaccines than saving lives, highlighting a profit-driven approach. This raises questions about the NIH's role, suggesting it operates like a for-profit entity, with officials potentially benefiting from vaccine success.

The video presents a sweeping throughline of Epstein “files” and related documents, claiming they reveal a tightly connected elite network that uses philanthropy, health funding, and geopolitical strategy for profit and control. Key points include: - Robert Trivers, a Harvard biologist, is shown in emails to Jeffrey Epstein discussing material the video labels as “sick” and representing elite thinking. The presenter cites a 2014 suspension and a 2015 Reuters interview in which Trivers described Epstein as a person of integrity and suggested Epstein’s acts were not heinous because “by the time girls are 14 or 15, they're like grown women.” The video asserts Trivers criticized Epstein and attempted to discredit him publicly, while continuing to discuss Epstein privately. - The broadcast references additional emails and unread content from Trivers and others, claiming the material demonstrates how elites think and act. It highlights a controversial line about intervening earlier in children’s development with hormones, framed as part of a broader claim about elite dynamics and manipulation. - Tablet magazine is cited as documenting years of foundations, media influence, and funding aimed at spreading the “trans thing” as a social contagion controlled from the top. The presenter claims the average trans person’s life costs and the notion that profit from “a life ruined” could reach up to a million dollars per life. - Norman Finkelstein is praised for criticizing Trevor’s, Alan Dershowitz, and Epstein, with the presenter quoting harsh exchanges and calling out supposed threats and jabs within the Epstein network. - The focus shifts to Bill Gates, JP Morgan, Tony Blair, Boris Nikolik, and others, alleging a shared interest in domestic health, neurotech brain science, and a panel on Global Health Investment Fund and impact investing. The video ties these figures to pandemic planning and profiteering, asserting they coordinated with the World Health Organization on pandemic strategy. - A central claim is that Epstein’s files outline a twenty-year financial architecture to turn pandemics into profit, including offshore vaccine funds, pandemic reinsurance triggers, donor-advised fund structures, and career pipelines into pharma and the World Economic Forum. The narrative ties these structures to events before COVID-19 and to Gates, JPMorgan, and Epstein, with references to a 2019 event and planning for involvement of the WHO and ICRC. - The discussion presents four specific “bombshells” from the Epstein-Gates email chains: (1) a donor-advised fund linked to Gates with an offshore arm for vaccines; (2) Epstein noting the money-making potential of charitable activity requiring arm’s-length arrangements; (3) Boris Nikolik and Gates considering donor-advised funds for energy and pandemics; (4) a Swiss Re parametric trigger development for health products and a pandemic bond trigger later issued by the World Bank. - A fifth bombshell claims an agreement letter where Gates asked Epstein to personally represent Boris Nikolik in Gates’ organization, with broad indemnification and access to elite legal and advisory networks. - The presenter argues that the real question is not whether a pandemic was planned but what safeguards existed to prevent profiteering, and he accuses a globalist network of using Epstein as an agent to manipulate public opinion and finance. - The video ties Epstein to broader conspiratorial narratives about Rothschilds, Davos, the World Economic Forum, cyber and genetics issues, and a globalist power network, asserting that the Epstein files reveal a coordinated, non-organic elite framework. - A closing appeal invites readers to Tragedy and Hope for context on how the network operates, positioning the book as essential for understanding the Epstein revelations and urging wider discussion and dissemination of the linked material.

During COVID, some people saw the actions of figures like Dr. Fauci, Bill Gates, the WHO, and Klaus Schwab, and wondered why more people didn't notice. This narrative has been ongoing since at least 1910, aiming to discredit chiropractors, naturopaths, nutritionists, and functional medicine doctors. Pharmaceutical companies pay doctors kickbacks and fund the schools that educate them. These doctors often sit on government boards, creating a system that protects its members and exploits vulnerable, sick individuals. Pharmaceutical companies, which educate doctors, prioritize profit over people's well-being, and are unconcerned about the millions of deaths they may have caused as long as they profit.