reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The video shows a fire truck being repositioned multiple times, with bodies being dragged and manipulated like dummies. The bodies are placed on the front of the fire truck and in a police car, which is revealed to be part of a drill involving over 90 agencies. The event is portrayed as a staged scenario used to push an agenda. The bodies are clearly shown to be dummies, not real people. This reveals the truth behind the event being a drill, not a real emergency.

The speaker is discussing the search for a PCR report in the fire department database. They mention that the report is not found for a specific date and explain that they need to obtain letters of administration first. The other speaker mentions that the person in question was found on the same day and provides photographs of them in the hospital. They express confusion as to why the report is not in the database. The first speaker suggests that the fire department personnel may not have provided documentation. The second speaker insists that they were told to get the PCR report by the fire department. The first speaker reiterates that the computer does not have a record of the report and they are unsure why.

Caller reports a male drowning at the back of the property. Rescue swimmers are attempting to reach him. The caller requests an ambulance and mentions a rescue swimmer getting a boat. The dispatcher confirms sending an ambulance and will contact the fire chief for further instructions. The caller asks for a callback number and the dispatcher provides it. The caller confirms the victim is a 40-year-old male wearing all black on a paddleboard. The rescue swimmers have located the paddleboard and hat but not the victim. The victim was not wearing a life vest. Additional responders are on their way to assist.

Captain Leonardo Vega, who was a hunting and fishing companion to Alejandro Carranza, the Colombian family says is the person who died in the bombing on September 15, clarifies the situation. They note there is confusion or an attempt to confuse people, and they are referring to the bombing carried out on September 15. Captain Vega thanks for accepting the invitation and explains the concern. Captain Vega and Captain Leon*ardo Vega’s colleagues from the maritime fishing guild describe their reaction to the news. They say they are worried because the fishing community is scared and nervous about the fishing operations they intended to carry out, and this has been a very hard blow for Alejandro’s family, whom they know well as a close colleague within a maritime captains association in Santa Marta. The atmosphere is tense and very nervous. Regarding the video, Captain Vega asks what is seen and what deductions can be made. The other speaker explains that the video shows the vessel adrift with its engine raised, which indicates the vessel is damaged and in an emergency. By international law, when a vessel is in an emergency and adrift, it is a situation that obligates others to come to assist.

The speaker introduces Emmanuel Bearer as someone they consider extremely shady and outlines a request to obtain explicit footage of him, specifically who he was with in the crowd, and to identify every person in attendance. The speaker claims Bearer is a former Oracle engineer, likely from Germany, and notes that Bearer attended the event. They question how Bearer, a relatively obscure figure, became an eyewitness who appeared in Salt Lake City in coverage by the mainstream media, specifically mentioning PBS. The speaker asks how PBS or other media outlets knew to reach out to Bearer and whether Bearer tweeted or otherwise indicated he was there. The speaker describes a desire to understand the process by which Bearer was selected for media interviews and to replicate a method of on-the-ground reporting at the UVU campus rather than relying on Bearer’s account. They reference a prior incident involving Tiffany Barker to illustrate concerns about how media connections are made and how certain individuals gain attention. The speaker asks for clarification on how Emmanuel Bearer was chosen as an eyewitness and why mainstream media pursued him. The speaker then presents a clip of Bearer testifying on PBS, quoting Bearer: “I hear this loud sound, and I'm like, that wasn't what I thought it was, is it? I was like, no. This can't be happening right now. And we all ducked.” They note that Bearer appeared on nearly every news channel and mention that there may be a longer clip they could locate. Finally, the speaker appeals to anyone who attended the UVU event with Bearer to come forward to clarify who Bearer was with, to send photos, and to explain how Bearer became an eyewitness that the mainstream media wanted to speak to, expressing strong suspicion about the unattended appearance and coverage of Bearer.

The speaker is praying that someone is pulling the missing person out of the river. The last communication was a text message indicating they were landing in twenty minutes. The speaker shared the text message about landing. Subsequent texts were not delivered, which made the speaker realize something might be wrong.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 address a viral video about Charlie’s chief of staff, Mikey, and explain why they are discussing it. - The video in question attacks Mikey, Charlie’s chief of staff, claiming based on a few seconds of clips that he allegedly has a nonchalant or calm reaction to Charlie’s murder. They describe this as a “extremely disgusting attack.” - Speaker 1 recounts what happened: they were at the scene when a shooting occurred. The loud crack is heard; they turn and see Charlie has been shot. They realize there is a shooter on the scene. They decide to get out of there rather than be shot, noting Charlie had a security team that leapt into action to get Charlie out. - Speaker 0 notes their own actions: he, too, considered getting into the car, but decided against it. He was ahead of Mikey as they left. He recalls a moment where he paused to assess the situation, then saw Mikey, who was profoundly freaked out. Mikey’s lip was quivering, and he said, “I need to call Erica,” then took his phone and began calling Erica. Speaker 0 also called his own mom, saying there had been a shooting and that he was okay. - They describe Mikey’s later actions: after the initial shock, Mikey took charge like a “general directing a battle,” coordinating hospital transport and information flow, and directing people where to go. When they learned Charlie had died, Mikey told them, “now none of you can say anything that you've heard because it is Erica is not going to hear about this from anyone except me.” - Speaker 2 asks if Mikey could be involved in a conspiracy to murder Charlie. Speaker 1 responds that such accusations are vile and describes how some people online fuel such narratives, comparing the mindset to getting a “high” from dangerous or provocative content. - The speakers emphasize Mikey’s heroic actions: Mikey was distressed but stepped up to direct people and communicate with Erica and others. Speaker 0 notes that he, too, was traumatized after learning of Charlie’s death and rushed to be with Erica and the team. - They address the specific allegation that Mikey was on the phone immediately during the incident; they state he was not on the phone but was taking social videos to share with their group chats. He would send updates to Charlie’s social media during the event while the crowd was changing, then, overwhelmed by the noise and shock, he put his fingers in his ears but his phone remained in his hand as he moved away. - They describe the scene as a cordoned-off area with a narrow gap that people used to exit, where Mikey walked briskly or ran as he processed the trauma and continued to direct actions. They reiterate Mikey “turned into a general on a field marshaling the troops.” - Speaker 1 closes by urging readers who propagate narratives attacking Mikey to reconsider, stating that such narratives are bad and gross and a choice that shouldn’t be made.

Caller reports a male drowning at the back of the property. Rescue swimmers are attempting to reach him. They request an ambulance and mention a rescue swimmer getting a boat. The caller asks for a better number to call back once they have more information. The dispatcher confirms sending an ambulance and will contact the fire chief for further instructions. The caller describes the drowning victim as a 40-year-old male on a paddleboard, wearing all black and no life vest. The rescue swimmers have found the paddleboard and hat but not the victim. Additional resources are being sent to the scene.

The speaker claims weather data is missing around the time a yacht sank, suggesting a potential "freak weather event." They allege that data is skipped on a weather tracking website, similar to what happened with the Iranian helicopter crash. The speaker says that on August 17th, the data skips from the 17th to the 19th, after the boat sank, preventing analysis of potential weather manipulation. The speaker then uses Zoom Earth to support their claim, stating that the platform also freezes. They show that on August 18th, the frames move until 3:45 AM, then freeze for six hours, resuming only after the yacht sank. The speaker concludes that the data points are unavailable, as the platform freezes before the event.

The speaker directs viewers to fireaid.org to search for grant round two and find Cal Volunteers. The speaker identifies Cal Volunteers as Newsom's nonprofit. Upon viewing the Cal Volunteers page, the speaker observes that the individuals pictured do not appear to be fire victims. The speaker notes that their clothes do not look burned out. The speaker concludes that Cal Volunteers did not need fire aid money.

The speaker is discussing the search for a PCR report from August 10, 2019, but it cannot be found in the fire department database. They speculate that the person may have been taken directly to the morgue. The speaker mentions having photographs of the person in the hospital. They discuss the possibility of the fire department personnel taking the person somewhere else, but the computer system does not have any record of it. The speaker acknowledges that the information they received from the fire department differs from what the computer system shows. They express confusion about why the record is missing.

The speaker confirms that they gave Timothy a warm bath the night before he passed away. This information was not previously disclosed to anyone involved in the case, including the police officers. The speaker is asked if they put Timothy in the bathtub and confirms that they did. The video abruptly ends with a discussion about trash in the community.

The speaker refutes the authenticity of a supposedly leaked video related to MH370. According to someone at the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, the video's telemetry doesn't match that of US government satellites. More critically, the speaker claims the video uses cloud footage from a known photo bank. The photographer of the cloud image has confirmed its origin. When confronted about the identical clouds, Ashton Forbes, who promoted the video, allegedly gave an inadequate and vulgar response. The speaker cites Mick West (Metabunk) and Mixer, who has a background in CGI, as providing persuasive arguments against the video's authenticity. The speaker anticipates aggressive attacks from Ashton Forbes for rejecting the theory and concludes the video is likely a hoax.

The video discusses the issue of missing children in Maui, Hawaii following a devastating fire. The speaker questions why there is a lack of reporting and government response to the situation. They suggest that there may be a cover-up happening in the media and social media platforms are suppressing information. The speaker also highlights the concerns raised by the community and the need for answers. The video mentions the Red Hill underground fuel storage facility and its historical significance. The speaker acknowledges their lack of production quality but emphasizes the importance of getting the information out. The video does not provide evidence but presents information for further investigation. (150 words)

The speaker references an episode where The Baron Coleman expands on Camp Huachuca, suggesting that the beep on the base could have been involved. The speaker states they did research in response to that suggestion and found a compelling video from The Baron Coleman. They note that there is actually video of Vance on the base, which indicates it could not have been Vance on the base. The speaker acknowledges they are getting ahead of themselves and plans to discuss more about this tomorrow. They describe The Baron Coleman’s video as very compelling.

In this video, the speaker addresses a false claim circulating on social media about marines finding 250 corpses with bullet holes on Maui and the arrest of a FEMA deputy administrator. The speaker emphasizes the importance of verifying information before sharing it. They advise using search engines and reputable sources to research the claims and the people behind them. The speaker expresses concern about the spread of misinformation and urges viewers to be responsible adults by conducting proper research before posting or sharing information. Despite potential censorship on TikTok, the speaker stresses that the video has been up for four hours and has over 9,000 shares, but the information is completely false.

The autopsy showed the bullet was fired at a downward angle, indicating someone else shot him while he was sitting down. The speaker and her husband plan to create a virtual reality video for court to demonstrate what happened. The victim had another head injury, evidenced by a fallen dustbin, toothpick, and blood in the sink around 10:10 PM, his last browser history. The speaker believes he was attacked from behind while brushing his teeth, possibly electrocuted or paralyzed, then held up and shot. The speaker believes the gunshot wound was not the cause of death because the bullet didn't touch the brain, only causing unconsciousness. She suspects he may have been suffocated. The speaker called the apartment at 12:15 PM on the 23rd, and it rang once before going to voicemail, leading her to believe the killers were still there. She suggests using geofencing to determine who was at the complex and calls for a thorough investigation.

- "I just tracked down the internal documents from Utah Valley University that shows the exact type of security cameras that were used, and we got a lot of questions." - "This is their own internal document showing us the roof access point and exactly how the cameras were mounted at the university where Charlie Kirk was assassinated." - "The Utah Valley University telecommunication distribution guide of 06/01/2022." - "A complete video surveillance system shall be provided." - "Cameras shall be fixed with ten eighty p HD IP cameras, and this is attached to a meeting date of 08/06/2024." - "There are ten eighty p HD cameras that were surveilling this man on probably multiple different locations throughout that campus."

Caller reports a male drowning at the back of the property. Rescue swimmers are attempting to reach him. They request an ambulance and mention having boat access. The dispatcher confirms sending an ambulance and contacts the fire chief for further instructions. The caller asks for a callback number and provides instructions for the ambulance. The gender and description of the drowning person are given. The rescue swimmers are unable to locate him, but they have found his paddle board and hat. It is confirmed that he was not wearing a life vest. Additional resources are dispatched to the scene.

Caller 1 reports a male drowning at the back of the property. Rescue swimmers are attempting to reach him. Caller 1 requests an ambulance and mentions a rescue swimmer getting a boat. Caller 1 asks for a better number to call back. Caller 2 confirms that the party has not been located and asks for a description. Caller 1 describes the man as a 40-year-old black male wearing all black on a paddleboard. The paddleboard and hat have been found, but not the man. Caller 1 confirms he was not wearing a life vest. Caller 2 informs that help is on the way.

Captain Leonardo Vega and his team assessed the situation based on video evidence and official reports. The boat is identified as a national eduardoño-type vessel, commonly used in the Taganga–Santa Marta area, Parque Tairona, La Guajira, equipped with two motors for fishing. This type of vessel is described as a national-brand eduardoño. Regarding Alejandro’s disappearance, the timeline begins with the family’s report and their stated times. They indicate that Alejandro told relatives he would go fishing on September 14. Subsequent videos show that he does not appear, and the vessel is Colombian, leading to the deduction that, with high probability, the companion aboard was bombarded. Captain Vega acknowledges the broader repercussions of the case and notes that there are two versions circulating publicly. The vessel’s departure point is La Guajira, with the family indicating he left at dawn on September 14 for fishing. The vessel’s condition appears to show the motor damaged or the boat stagnant, raising questions about whether Alejandro was dragged into international waters or if the boat remained in Colombian waters. The team explains that, based on the video evidence and the timing after the video’s release, no more than 48 hours had elapsed since the departure. This short timespan implies that a boat of this type could not have traveled beyond 200 miles into international waters within that period. Consequently, they contend that the evidence suggests the boat did not traverse to distant international waters within the reported timeframe.

The speaker discusses inconsistencies in photos of Derek Chauvin, the officer involved in the George Floyd case. They compare different angles, skin hue, hairline, and other facial features to argue that the photos do not represent the same person. They emphasize the importance of original source evidence and question the authenticity of the photos. The speaker also mentions the lack of videos and small channels discussing the topic. They conclude that some photos may be of Chauvin, but others are questionable. Overall, they provide a thorough analysis of the photos.

The speaker claims proof exists on fireaid.org. They instruct the listener to search for "grant round two" and scroll to "Cal volunteers," which they identify as Newsom's nonprofit. The speaker questions the appearance of the Cal volunteers, stating they don't look like fire victims and appear to have nice clothes, implying they didn't need fire aid money.

Speaker 0: Only 2 out of the 89 souls lost in the recent incident have been identified so far. Speaker 1: We are finding the remains of these individuals through a fire that melted metal, so we have to use rapid DNA to identify them. All 89 victims are currently referred to as John and Jane Does. We understand the urgency to move quickly, but we also need to ensure accuracy. The remains are fragile and have been disturbed by the large number of people at the scene. Please give us time to contain the situation as we have 89 notifications to make. We have experienced similar pain before and we are committed to doing this right, even if it takes time.

The speaker mentions that videos of the events on January 6th are easily accessible on the internet. They encourage viewers to find these videos themselves, as they believe they may contain information that contradicts the prevailing narrative about that day. The speaker suggests that the situation was more complex than commonly portrayed.