TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Secretary of State Raffensperger sent a contractor to Fulton County, known for its voting issues. The contractor witnessed double scanning of ballots, unidentified individuals taking election materials, and discussions about disrupting the election. A 29-page report detailing errors, mismanagement, and chaos in the election was known to state officials since November. This contradicts Raffensperger's claims during a phone call with President Trump. It is unlikely that Raffensperger's office was unaware of the report.

A Georgia election official, who is a Democrat, discovered that none of the straight party Republican tickets in the recent runoff were being scanned. She contacted Dominion, the company responsible for the voting machines, and expressed her concern about the ballots going to adjudication instead of being counted. Dominion insisted that she just push the green button. Frustrated, she threatened to contact the local media. Dominion quickly sent someone to fix the issue. The Dominion representative acknowledged the problem and made a phone call. Ten minutes later, he returned and assured her that everything was fixed. It is important to note that the voting machines were not connected to the internet.

The discussion centers on the integrity of the 2020 election processes and how Georgia’s handling of audits and recounts could shape reforms for 2026. Speaker 0 argues that ensuring elections represent the will of the people is fundamental, noting that Trump and his allies made a spectacle in 2020 by pursuing audits and recounts and even the Capitol insurrection, yet Georgia, among other states, would not have allowed Trump to win even without Georgia’s results. They claim Democrats and progressives avoided touching the issue in 2024 despite Trump’s unexpected nationwide sweep, and criticize the inability to conduct a proper recount. Speaker 1 warns that Trump’s team is likely to present ballots and photographs from 2020 to claim irregularities, arguing that there were thousands of irregularities in Fulton County, with miscounts and ballot manipulation possible, though there is no evidence that these irregularities would have changed the Georgia result. They contend that irregularities occurred both ways and tended to offset, but many records were destroyed and the recount and audit lacked quality. The speaker asserts that 2026 must avoid untrustworthy machines and inadequate audit/recount processes. The speakers discuss the possibility that Trump’s supporters will use information from the DOJ to misrepresent the facts, stating that even if facts were presented, they would expose known errors in the certified processes. They allege that ballots were counted multiple times during the recount, including counting some ballots two or three times and even introducing fake test ballots to force outcomes. Marilyn is cited as noting that a Barack Obama appointee judge confirmed the unreliability of Dominion machines, and that a demonstration at DEF CON Voting Village showed how easily a Dominion machine could be hacked. Jessica is referenced as discussing Phil Davis, a pro-Trump election integrity figure who admitted that Biden won Georgia despite his broader views. The point is to emphasize that, even among election integrity experts with conservative leanings, there is belief that Biden won Georgia. The conversation returns to Raffensperger, who selected the machines and the audit/recount method, spending approximately $150 million on machines and avoiding transparency about errors. The guests argue that the law required a hand count at tables with representatives from both campaigns and the clerk, instead of a machine-only recount. Bypassing this process enabled the perception of fraud and contributed to the January 6 insurrection’s fuel in Georgia. A key lesson for 2026, they assert, is to implement a transparent process with hand counts and representative participation at counting tables, preventing the bypass of proper procedures and reducing the political pressure that distorts outcomes. They critique the atmosphere surrounding the 2020 aftermath as vilifying and pressure-filled, predicting a similar environment in 2026 unless genuine transparency and nonpartisan verification are pursued.

Georgia owes President Donald J. Trump an apology for election fraud. Evidence shows 17,852 votes were counted without ballot images, and 3,930 ballots were scanned and counted twice intentionally. The process involved randomly selecting and rescanning ballots on different days. This deliberate duplication was not an administrative error but human intervention, constituting election fraud. The speaker urges Secretary Raffensperger to investigate independently.

Votes in Georgia were counted three times using paper and machines. Concerns were raised about the lack of transparency and oversight in the vote review process, especially during adjudication. The speakers emphasized the importance of open-source voting programs to ensure transparency and prevent manipulation. They highlighted the need for concrete evidence and clear processes to build trust in the election system. Open-source systems were seen as a way to increase transparency and accountability in elections.

New evidence suggests that there was no voting machine election audit performed in Georgia, despite claims by the Secretary of State. This is concerning because Georgia played a crucial role in the 2020 election. A public comment during a state election board meeting revealed that there is little to no evidence that the audit actually took place. In addition, Georgia election workers are suing Giuliani and seeking to bar him from making public statements about the election. Surveillance footage shows workers scanning the same stack of ballots multiple times and continuing to count after observers had left. The video evidence and accounts from the 2020 election point to clear election fraud, yet there seems to be a lack of evidence to support further investigation.

I recently interviewed Chris Kress who emphasized the importance of looking at Georgia to understand election integrity. He repeatedly pointed to the events in Georgia as evidence.

A witness named Garland Favarito is about to testify about a Dominion machine in Ware County, Georgia. He claims that the machine flipped 37 votes from Trump to Biden. Although it may not seem like a significant number, it represents a large portion of the total votes in the small county. This testimony is important because it shows that vote flipping can happen and has evidence to support it. The argument is that if it can happen in Ware County, it can happen anywhere, like Augusta County, Fulton County, or even Maricopa County in Arizona. The Democrats are struggling to respond, with one senator claiming that it has already been debunked, despite the evidence being recently released.

The 2020 election had 9,000 updates, with 4 extreme updates that had a less than 1 tenth of one percent chance of happening. These updates were argued to be human errors, but if they were corrected, where is the evidence? Some claim that the spikes indicate heavily democratic precincts, but California doesn't show similar spikes. The strangest anomaly is a consistent ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time, which seems theoretically impossible. This pattern appears in many states, suggesting a computer algorithm called weighted race distribution is involved. Diebold voting machines, known for giving values to votes, have been linked to vote switching in past elections. Dominion Voting Systems acquired Diebold's software. Eyewitness and video evidence in Georgia shows a poll worker named Ruby in a backroom filled with absentee ballots.

A Georgia representative reported that a voter in Whitfield County experienced issues with a Dominion voting machine. The machine allegedly switched votes on the printed ballot, not reflecting the voter's selections for president, congress, or other races. The voter reported the issue to election workers and had to restart the process multiple times, with the same error occurring repeatedly. The representative also expressed concerns about states like Pennsylvania, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Michigan not fixing their election laws after 2020. Additional concerns include overseas voters receiving instructions via email on how to obtain and submit absentee ballots electronically, as well as the potential for illegal aliens to vote. The representative believes there is a good reason why people are skeptical and don't trust elections. They stated that everyone they talk to feels Donald Trump would win by a landslide if the election isn't stolen, citing betting markets, business sectors, and the prevalence of Trump signs in people's yards as indicators of his support.

There are concerns about fraud with Dominion Voting Machines due to security vulnerabilities. In Georgia, people are fighting to remove them from elections. A computer scientist showed how easy it is to manipulate the machines in court. There are worries about internet connectivity and foreign access to the machines. Dominion is suing those who accused them of cheating in the 2020 election, but facing challenges in court. Emails suggest foreign nationals accessed US voting machines. Questions remain about the security and integrity of Dominion Voting Machines.

Protecting the voting process in Georgia is crucial this election season. Independent experts are examining the state's new $107 million voting system, which includes a complex array of technology such as laptops, iPads, touch screens, and scanners. While Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger believes this system is more accurate than pen and paper, critics argue that paper records marked by voters are the ideal solution. The new machines faced issues during the June primary, including long download times, incorrect race displays, and power failures. Concerns have also been raised about the QR codes used for scanning votes and a last-minute software patch. Despite these concerns, the election will proceed with the ballot marking device system, and post-election audits will be conducted.

I received another certified letter from the state election board, proving that both the hand audit and certified machine count in Georgia violated election law. To those who fought for the truth, I say one word: vindicated. Thank you.

I won the election, but I didn't get the job because of cheating. The election was stolen from us. I don't think it's dangerous to use words like "rigged" and "stolen" because we have evidence to back it up. I won't concede because our democracy is being eroded. Thousands of voters in Georgia had their voices stolen and their votes may not be counted in 2020. If an election is rigged, it should not be conceded. The election was stolen from Georgia voters and the process was unfair. I refuse to call it a loss. I can't prove I would have won, but Brian Kemp's actions affected the outcome. He is the legal governor, but not the legitimate one. The election was tainted and thousands of voters were disenfranchised. I still stand by my decision not to concede. The election was not fair, right, or proper. Brian Kemp dismantled our democracy, making free and fair elections impossible.

The speaker states that 37 votes were flipped from President Trump to former Vice President Biden in Ware County. This was discovered by Dr. Earl Martin, who provided certified election results and published hand count results as evidence. The elections director of Ware County confirmed this in writing. The speaker suggests a forensic examination of the machines, but the Secretary of State sent a letter prohibiting it.

US Army forces seized a computer server in Frankfurt, Germany, which some believe was manipulated by US intelligence. Reports suggest that the server contains the real results of the 2020 US election, showing a landslide victory for President Trump with 410 electoral college votes. A Virginia congressional candidate shared an electoral map based on this data, including California and Minnesota as Trump's wins. Congressman Louie Gohmert claims that vulnerabilities in the Dominion Voting System allowed the theft of the real election results. The data from the server could provide compelling evidence of how many votes were switched from Republican to Democrat. It is alleged that this evidence is enough to overturn the election and expose voter fraud by the Democratic party.

- The discussion centers on Fulton County’s ballot-seizure case and the implication that the affidavit relied on was built from recycled conspiracy theories by a known conspiracy figure. It is asserted that the judge was not told these issues had already been relitigated, and that the administration appears intent on applying the same approach elsewhere. - Question raised: can these efforts be stopped, given the underlying pattern and what the other side is pursuing? And what is their plan for 2026 if they lack the 2020 conspiracies to lean on? - Jen notes her role as counsel in the Fulton County matter and declines to comment further on the specifics. - Jessica forecasts that Trump-aligned actors will pull out 2020 ballots and photos, arguing that the numbers don’t add up and that the machines were faulty and the people fudged because, allegedly, in Fulton County they did. She emphasizes that there is no evidence that the irregularities would have changed the outcome in Georgia, but acknowledges there were thousands of irregularities, with records destroyed and chain-of-custody issues, and that the recount and audit were of poor quality. She warns that in 2026 the same approach could be used again with untrustworthy machines and flawed audits, and warns that even if actual facts are shown, they would highlight known errors. - Marilyn adds the point that a Barack Obama-appointee judge confirmed the unreliability of the machines and notes a demonstrator at DEFCON Voting Village showed how easily a Dominion machine can be hacked. She cites a view that Biden still won Georgia, despite the “fudged audits,” and argues that the intent behind the questionable procedures was to obscure errors. - Jessica identifies Raffensperger as the official who chose the machines and funded the expansive spending on them, suggesting he did not want critical issues to be exposed. She asserts that the process was designed to avoid scrutiny and that the results were obtained by running ballots through the machine multiple times to adjust numbers, including using test ballots to influence results. - The conversation concludes with a focus on the importance of recounts and audits, and the need for a transparent process in 2026. Jessica argues that Georgia’s issues stemmed from an audit with bogus processes and a recount conducted through machines rather than a hand count at counting tables with observers from both campaigns and the clerk. She asserts that the transparency of the counting process could have mitigated much of the controversy and that the lesson for 2026 is to implement a transparent system.

According to the speaker, in Ware County, the system flipped 37 votes from President Trump to former Vice President Biden. This was discovered by Dr. Earl Martin, a Waycross City Commission candidate. Certified election results from the county and published hand count results confirmed that 37 votes were shorted from President Trump and added to Joseph Biden. The speaker claims they obtained written confirmation from the elections director of Ware County, and included this in an unrebutted affidavit. The speaker states that a suggested forensic exam has not been done. Instead, the speaker claims the secretary of state sent a threatening letter to the counties to tell them not to allow forensic exams on Dominion machines.

All votes in The United States Of America are counted in The United States Of America. There is no evidence that any machine has been manipulated by a foreign power. Recounts are consistent with the initial count, confirming that the systems used in the twenty twenty election performed as expected. The American people should have 100% confidence in their vote. A lawyer representing the president claimed that Dominion voting machines ran an algorithm to take votes from President Trump and flip them to President Biden. Votes in Georgia were cast on paper, counted by a machine, and recounted by hand, with consistent outcomes. If there was an algorithm flipping votes, it didn't work. The more likely explanation is that there was no algorithm and that security controls protected the systems from misbehavior.

Biden aimed to flip the election, and Georgia's Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, provided an update. With about 2% of votes remaining, Georgia saw a record turnout of 4.7 million voters, surpassing 2016's 4.1 million. The average wait time was just 2 minutes. Raffensperger noted that he doesn't expect the remaining votes to change the outcome, based on current results and where the outstanding votes are located. Analysts suggest the remaining votes are from heavily Democratic areas, which may slightly affect the margin but not the overall results. The counties are working diligently to finalize the count today.

Contrary to the current political narrative, the speaker emphasizes that voting machines are not connected to the Internet, making them secure. However, in 2018, there were instances of electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleting or switching votes. The speaker mentions that even hackers with limited knowledge and resources were able to breach these machines easily. They also highlight concerns about remote access software making the machines vulnerable to fraudsters and hackers. The speaker clarifies that Dominion, the company in question, has no involvement in switched or deleted votes, and has no ties to communism or China. However, there are indications that some machines may be connected to the Internet, despite being designed as closed systems.

Contrary to the current political narrative, the speaker emphasizes that voting machines are not connected to the internet and the Department of Homeland Security claims the 2020 election was secure. However, in 2018, there were instances of electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleting or switching votes. The speaker mentions that hackers were able to breach these machines easily, even with limited knowledge and resources. They also mention the concern of remote access software making the machines vulnerable to fraudsters and hackers. The speaker then addresses the controversy surrounding Dominion, stating that there were no switched or deleted votes involving their machines and that the company has no ties to communism or China. However, there are concerns that some machines may be connected to the internet despite being designed as closed systems.

Georgia officials, including Governor Kemp and Secretary Rassenberger, are criticized for their involvement with Dominion Voting Systems. The speaker claims that Kemp's chief of staff now works for Dominion. Despite pre-election challenges and allegations of a cover-up, the goal is to implement a new voting system by 2020. Dominion's experience and history in the state are discussed, with Georgia being praised for its secure election by Christopher Krebs. However, others blame Kemp, Rassenberger, and Carr for the destruction in the country. Overall, the systems used in the 2020 election performed as expected.

In the upcoming election, 100% of votes in Georgia will be recorded on security paper with the state seal. President Trump implied that delayed vote tabulation indicates potential wrongdoing, citing a lack of paper ballots as a problem and claiming results could take 7 days. However, over 96% of voting nationwide will be on paper ballots. In Georgia, a new law (SB 189) mandates that results for all early votes and early accepted ballots, potentially 70-75% of the total, be reported by 8 PM on election night. The remaining delay involves overseas ballots, with final numbers expected by Friday. Georgia aims to ensure fast, accurate, and secure elections.

We counted Georgia's election ballots three times, confirming no consequential fraud. Despite issues with ballot images and scanning errors, the recount showed similar results to the original count. Doubts remain about double scanning and counting of votes, suggesting potential fraud. The Secretary of State's office conducted an exhaustive investigation, but concerns persist about the accuracy of the results. The Georgia State Election Board is commended for their diligence and transparency in addressing election issues.