TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker stumbled upon the involvement of the CIA in vaccine production, specifically with Pfizer and Moderna. They discovered that Resilience, a biotechnology company, partnered with Moderna and received significant funding from the US government, Department of Defense, and other organizations. The speaker also highlighted connections between Resilience's team members and the intelligence community, as well as ties to big banking. They expressed concerns about the influence of these individuals and organizations in the production of vaccines and emphasized the need for transparency and control. The speaker also mentioned the involvement of Illumina and the connections between various board members.

In 2015, a 153-page agreement between Moderna and the US government reveals collaboration with Dr. Barrick on mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates. The NIH co-owns the vaccine, as shown in the agreement. This predates current events and raises questions about ulterior motives.

Speaker 0 argues that anyone can file a complaint with a law enforcement authority for murder conspiracy and demand arrests and prosecutions. He points to a 2013 press release claiming that DARPA awarded Moderna Therapeutics up to $25,000,000 to develop messenger RNA therapeutics, noting that DARPA is the Pentagon and claiming the Pentagon bought, paid for, and envisioned these mRNA shots. He contends Fort Detrick was involved in developing COVID-19 at the UNC BSL-3 and asserts the Pentagon is on both sides of the argument, developing the weapon and the alleged vaccines. Speaker 1 asks whether there is any liability shield for deploying a biowarfare weapon and whether the narrative about congressional liability for Pfizer is a SIOP. Speaker 0 agrees that civil liability is separate from criminal liability, stating in his book Resisting Medical Tyranny that executives at companies developing these mRNA shots are guilty of murder and conspiracy to commit murder. He cites a Portugal report claiming that upwards of 300,000 Americans had been murdered by the mRNA Franken shots and invokes the JAB resolution, describing it as a Nuremberg crime against humanity and a violation of the Nuremberg Code. He defines a Nuremberg crime against humanity as murder, extermination, and other inhumane acts committed against civilians. Speaker 1 asks about liability for government officials who approved the vaccines. Speaker 0 says FDA officials who approved the shots could be indicted for murder and conspiracy to commit murder, noting the FDA’s involvement in developing COVID-19 as an offensive biological warfare weapon at UNC BSL-3, including a cited contract listing National Center for Toxicological Research and FDA as contributors. He claims the FDA, which approves the vaccines, was involved in this development. Speaker 1 questions the CDC and media accountability, noting the CDC’s recommendation of the vaccines and media promotion of boosters. Speaker 0 says the CDC, including Director Milensky (appointed by Biden, from Harvard Medical School), is complicit, and claims the CDC has a history dating back to the Reagan administration of handling offensive biological warfare projects, including shipping weaponized agents to Saddam Hussein with implications for U.S. troops after Gulf War I. Speaker 1 asks whether there are lawmakers with intel on gain-of-function biowarfare. Speaker 0 mentions Senator Rand Paul as having a strong understanding, but asserts that some lawmakers were threatened and obstructed after consulting him, recounting an experience with Walter Jones of the House Armed Services Committee who briefly engaged but then did not follow up, implying threats prevented action. Speaker 1 asks how citizens should respond, and Speaker 0 advocates reporting to sheriffs, district attorneys, and state attorneys, noting progress with a Collier County health freedom declaration. They discuss enforcement mechanisms, seizure, and incineration of stockpiles, and trial and sentencing for those responsible. Speaker 0 condemns China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology as a bioweapons lab, alleging it was a Chinese counterpart to Fort Detrick, with the Chinese president seeking his own BSL-4 program and an offensive biowarfare arsenal. Speaker 1 notes U.S. funding and international bioweapons labs, including Ukraine and Taiwan, and ends by referencing Lindsey Graham and a speaker labeled as a professor Boyle.

The top agencies leading Operation Warp Speed were the NSA and the Pentagon, not public health agencies like HHS, CDC, or NIH. The vaccines were developed by NIH and manufactured by military tractors, with Pfizer and Moderna being paid to put their names on them. The speaker believes that Operation Warp Speed is not new, as it has been happening since 1980 at Fort Detrick, a bioweapons lab. They claim that the government has been involved in unethical practices, such as injecting the military with HIV in the 1990s.

The speaker discusses the COVID vaccine and accuses Dr. Fauci of working with the Wuhan lab and profiting from the vaccine. They mention the success of the vaccine and the money made from it. The speaker also mentions various individuals and organizations involved in the vaccine distribution. Towards the end, they mention a conference and someone being troubled by something. The transcript ends with Dr. Fauci being arrested and confusion about the situation.

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 vaccines were not developed by Moderna and Pfizer, but by the NIH, which owns 50% of the patents. They also assert that the vaccines were not manufactured by Pfizer or Moderna, but by military contractors. According to the speaker, Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on the vaccines, implying they originated from the pharmaceutical industry, when in reality, the speaker says, it was a military project from the beginning.

The vaccines were developed by the NIH, not Moderna or Pfizer. The patents are 50% owned by the NIH, and they were manufactured by military contractors. Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their names on the vaccines, but it was a military project from the start.

The speaker claims the DOD distributed COVID-19 vaccines and required absolute immunity, making it difficult to sue for damages without proving intentionality. They have a potential RICO claim, but litigation costs are prohibitive. They question why liability shields are needed if the vaccines are safe and effective. The speaker alleges EcoHealth Alliance and the CCP created SARS-CoV-2 in a Wuhan lab with the DOD or CIA's knowledge. They cite a study showing a 12 nucleotide sequence in a Moderna patent matching SARS-CoV-2, suggesting the disease was developed in the mid-2010s. The speaker presents military medical records showing a soldier receiving COVID-19 immunizations by Moderna in 2014, raising questions about the true history of COVID-19 and Operation Warp Speed. They claim the DOD and CIA were involved and asks to what extent and for how long. They also state they can show Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a study protocol based on oncolytic gene products for gene therapy shedding.

In 2015, a 153-page confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government is discussed. The agreement reveals collaboration between the NIH, Moderna, and Dr. Barrick on mRNA technology for a coronavirus vaccine. The government co-owns the vaccine candidates developed, raising questions about ulterior motives. This predates any current political affiliations.

The vaccines were not developed by Moderna or Pfizer, but by the NIH. The patents are owned by the NIH, and the vaccines were manufactured by military contractors. Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on the vaccines, but this was originally a military project.

In this video, the speaker discusses a confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government, spanning 153 pages. The agreement dates back to 2015, when the Frankenstein coronavirus was first discovered. The NIH and Moderna collaborated with Doctor Barrick, as shown on page 106 of the agreement. The NIH appears to be transferring mRNA technology to Doctor Barrick, while also jointly owning the mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed with Moderna. The speaker finds it surprising that the government co-owns the vaccine, especially considering they are now mandating its use. It is important to note that this agreement predates any current political context.

In this video, the speaker discusses a confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government from 2015. They mention the collaboration between the NIH, Moderna, and doctors Barrick and Xi regarding the Frankenstein coronavirus. The speaker highlights that the NIH appears to be transferring mRNA technology to doctor Barrick and points out that the government co-owns the mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed by the NIAID and Moderna. They emphasize that this information is not related to the Trump administration and express surprise at the government's ownership of the vaccine. The speaker suggests sharing this information quickly.

The speaker claims the DOD distributed COVID-19 vaccines and required absolute immunity, making the DOD the target for lawsuits, which would be difficult to win without the data they are hiding. They believe EcoHealth Alliance created SARS CoV-2 in the Wuhan lab with the DOD or CIA's approval, transferring the necessary technology to the CCP. A study showed a 12 nucleotide sequence in a Moderna patent from 2016 perfectly matched SARS CoV-2, suggesting the disease was developed in the mid-2010s. The speaker presents military medical records showing a soldier receiving COVID-19 immunizations by Moderna in 2014, suggesting the need to investigate the real history of COVID. They also claim to have Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a Komunardi approval agreeing to a study based on oncolytic gene products for gene therapy shedding.

This is a 153-page confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government from 2015. It reveals that the NIH collaborated with Dr. Barrick on the Frankenstein Coronavirus. The agreement states that the mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed by NIAID and Moderna are jointly owned by the government. It's surprising that the same government now mandating the vaccine actually owns it.

The vaccines were not developed by Moderna and Pfizer, but by the NIH, which owns 50% of the patents. Furthermore, the vaccines were not manufactured by Pfizer or Moderna, but by military contractors. Pfizer and Moderna were allegedly paid to put their stamps on the vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry, but it was supposedly a military project.

This video discusses a confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government, spanning 153 pages. It reveals that in 2015, the NIH collaborated with doctors Barrick and Shi on the Frankenstein Coronavirus. The agreement shows that the NIH transferred mRNA technology to doctor Barrick, and it states that the mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates are jointly owned by the NIAID and Moderna. The video highlights the irony that the government, which now mandates the vaccine, co-owns it. The speaker suggests sharing this information quickly, as its longevity is uncertain.

In this video, the speaker discusses a confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government, spanning 153 pages. The agreement dates back to 2015, the same time when a paper on the Frankenstein coronavirus was published by Doctors Barrick and Shee. The NIH and Moderna collaborated with Doctor Barrick, as shown on page 106 of the agreement. The NIH appears to be transferring mRNA technology to Doctor Barrick, while also jointly owning the mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed with Moderna. The speaker finds it surprising that the government co-owns the vaccine, and clarifies that this agreement is not related to any recent political events.

Speaker 0: I find information like this, you know, inserts for the vaccine. Paper's there, and there's nothing printed on it. I find that very interesting, disheartening, disgusting, and lots of other words, but then it gets better. It just keep wait. There's more. It just keeps happening. The CDC redacts every single word of a 148 page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. So I asked research to print the study for me. 148 pages. The entire thing is redacted. What good does a study do if there's nothing there? Then I wanna know, wait, what might have been there that they needed to redact it? That's even scarier. Speaker 1: We're witnessing an active cover up of a colossal consumer product safety debacle that is is basically affecting the entire world. Mhmm. So in The United States, our CDC, National Institutes of Health, and the FDA are actively involved in a cover up. And the same is occurring in The UK with the MHRA, Europe with European medicine agencies, and Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Something is going on that's very big. Each one of these companies that puts out a product has an obligation to produce ninety days of safety monitoring after their product comes out. It's a regulatory dossier. If somebody has a problem with the new product and they call the company like Pfizer, Pfizer has to report, write down what happened, and they have to collate that in a report and produce it and make it publicly available. When it came to ninety days with Pfizer, the first vaccine that came out, remember Pfizer was approved 12/10/2020. Pfizer didn't produce the report. And then people started asking, well, what's happening with your vaccine? And Pfizer would not disclose what happened. And then it went to court. And the lawyer for the FDA stepped in and said they don't wanna release Pfizer's dossier for fifty five years. Mhmm. Oh. Fifty five years. And the the the plaintiff pushed. And finally, slowly, the Pfizer dossier came out. Pfizer recorded one thousand two hundred and twenty three deaths with their product within ninety days of release. People were calling Pfizer in desperation watching their family members die after taking the vaccine. Pfizer recorded over twelve hundred new adverse events, new problems that doctor Boden has talked to you about that we are grappling with the entire time. But the point is our FDA worked to cover this up. The FDA should be regulating this company. FDA should have been having at least monthly meetings and fully disclosing what was going on with these novel vaccines, which are a genetic transfer technology platform.

Speaker 0 contends that the top organization that managed Operation Warp Speed and the pandemic was not a public health agency but the NSA, a spy agency, with the Pentagon as the second agency. He asserts that vaccines were developed not by Moderna and Pfizer, but by NIH, whose patents are owned 50% by NIH, and that vaccines were manufactured not by Pfizer or Moderna but by military contractors. He claims Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on those vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry. Speaker 1 responds by stating it’s not warp speed, but has been happening since 06/10/1980 when entering a Fort Detrick military installation, where the sign was turned around with then-president Richard Nixon. He says, “Oh, we’re just gonna cure cancer,” but asserts they turned the sign around on the bioweapons lab, making it a historic landmark at Fort Detrick where they had the gas chamber for the end and a plaque was placed when a new lab was built. He characterizes it as all part of a “plague of corruption” and claims that those involved are protecting themselves because the government, and they played the game. Speaker 1 further alleges that it does not matter whether it is Deborah Birx or Robert Redfield, because they injected the military with HIV in the nineties, and that they know it. He references “HIV p n l four three” and claims to know the plasmid and the exact one, asserting that he knows the people who were injected and that this data exists in his freezer.

In this video, the speaker discusses the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and raises concerns about a potential intentional or accidental release of a respiratory pathogen. They mention that Moderna's patent applications were modified to include this justification for creating a vaccine before the virus even existed. The speaker claims that there was a premeditated plan to use the coronavirus to push for a universal vaccine template. They also highlight a statement from a 2015 National Academy of Sciences proceeding, suggesting that this act was a form of domestic terrorism and a financial fraud. The speaker emphasizes the importance of investigating the premeditation behind these events.

The speaker questions the theory that the origin of SARS-CoV-2 was a bat and pangolin in a Wuhan market. They mention that Moderna modified patent applications in 2019 to include the justification for a vaccine against a non-existent respiratory pathogen. The speaker emphasizes the premeditated nature of the alleged plan to create a universal vaccine template using coronavirus. They claim that this plan was discussed in September 2019 and intended to generate profit. The speaker accuses this act of being an act of domestic terrorism and biological and chemical warfare on humanity, as admitted in a 2015 National Academy of Sciences publication. The motive behind this act is said to be financial gain.

In 2015, a 153-page agreement between Moderna and the US government reveals collaboration with Dr. Barrick on mRNA tech for a coronavirus vaccine. The NIH co-owns the vaccine candidates with Moderna. This predates current events and raises questions about government involvement in vaccine ownership.

In 2015, a 153-page confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government reveals collaboration with Dr. Barrick on mRNA coronavirus vaccines. The NIH co-owns the vaccine candidates with Moderna. This predates current events and raises questions about ulterior motives.

This document is a 153-page confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government dating back to 2015. At that time, researchers were working on a new coronavirus. Notably, the NIH and Moderna collaborated with Dr. Barrick, whose signature appears on the material transfer agreement. The NIH is transferring mRNA technology to Dr. Barrick, but it's important to note that the mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates are jointly owned by the NIAID and Moderna. This agreement predates the Trump administration's initiatives, highlighting that the government co-owns the vaccine it is now mandating. This information is crucial and should be shared quickly.

Speaker 0 discusses the origin and framing of pandemic prevention and vaccine development as a military-led initiative. He cites a 2012 DARPA program called the Adept Protect p three program, described as a pandemic prevention platform. The proposal outlined the use of gene-encoded vaccines based on RNA or DNA with the goal of stopping a pandemic within sixty days. He suggests that, by the time President Trump referenced “Operation Warp Speed” to develop vaccines, there should have been preparation and acknowledgement that this work dated back to 2012, making it not rapid innovation but a decade-long effort. He argues that the public narrative of rapid development and stunning innovation surrounding vaccines is deceptive and that contractors like Moderna had already secured multi-million-dollar contracts in 2013. He notes that the military operates programs addressing biological threats and also works on answers such as monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. The claim is made that the military originated the idea of messenger RNA vaccines, not Pfizer or Moderna, and not in response to the outbreak from Wuhan. According to the speaker, this is a military program in origin and administration. The speaker asserts that Health and Human Services, under Alex Azar, together with the Department of Defense, ushered the public into a vaccine era, framing Emergency Use Authorization as a mechanism to rapidly deploy new technology into the military rather than the public. He contends that this mechanism’s broad public application began with the COVID-19 pandemic, which is presented as evidence that the FDA lacks ownership or control over the process because the program is characterized as military in origin and execution. The overall claim is that the program operates like a military operation with universal reach and without exemptions, implying a deeply embedded military approach to vaccine development and deployment. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the continuity from a 2012 program proposal through to the public health landscape observed during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, asserting that the military’s involvement, timeline, and governance underlie the current vaccine paradigm and its regulatory pathways.