reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Milk is banned in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Japan, and the EU because cows were given the synthetic hormone RBGH to increase milk production. Public awareness led to consumer backlash, causing many manufacturers to discontinue its use. This demonstrates the impact of consumer action.

Max Kane gives a tour of Amos Miller's cooler in Pennsylvania, showcasing nutrient-dense food detained by the government. The raw milk, butter, cheese, kefir, and other products are deemed unsafe. The detentions have been ongoing for a month, affecting a variety of items like salsa, granola, and fermented vegetables. The situation reflects traditional food-making practices before industrialization. A court rally is scheduled for February 29th to address the issue.

Walmart's milk is derived from cows treated with rBST, a synthetic growth hormone. This may be a contributing factor to children entering puberty at increasingly younger ages. Therefore, consumers should avoid purchasing this milk.

The speaker explains why they don't pasteurize their milk, stating that raw milk from grass-fed cows, produced in a clean environment, has a different pH and quality. This milk is biologically active, containing enzymes that aid digestion, offering more nutritional benefits. In contrast, milk from confined dairy cows fed grain has higher bacteria levels due to pH changes. Pasteurization, while killing harmful bacteria in this milk, also destroys beneficial enzymes, rendering the milk inert and harder to digest. The speaker claims that raw milk from grass-fed cows contains beneficial cultured bacteria, similar to yogurt, making it good for you. Furthermore, this raw milk has a longer shelf life than pasteurized milk because it doesn't sour in the same way.

Speaker 0 discusses the idea that the immune system is adaptive to threats and connects this to the consumption of raw milk. He references studies conducted in Europe, stating that children who drink raw milk do not get the flu and do not get the common cold, saying that “those are viruses.” He notes that these effects were observed over ten years of study, implying a long-term pattern rather than a short-term anomaly. The speaker contrasts raw milk with vaccines, suggesting that the former changes from year to year not through vaccination but because the cows adapt to that year’s environment and that year’s viruses, thereby creating antibodies for the new strain every year. He asserts that “raw milk changes every year” due to this environmental and viral adaptation in cows, and that mother nature’s blueprint supports this process. Based on this, he argues for valuing farming practices over pharmaceutical interventions, stating that the United States has a compromised gut microbiome and immune system, which makes people susceptible to fear. He emphasizes not giving in to fear, describing fear as a manipulative tool that arises from concerns about the gut microbiome and immune health. The speaker laments the situation as “sad,” urging a shift toward natural, farm-based approaches as preferable to pharmaceutical reliance, and advocating a perspective aligned with “be farmers over pharmacies.” The overarching message is that raw milk, by virtue of yearly adaptive changes in cows and their environment, may confer immune benefits that differ from those provided by vaccines, and that cultural and public health narratives should not be driven by fear but by an appreciation of natural processes and farming practices.

90% of US cheese contains genetically modified rennet from Pfizer, speeding up production and increasing profits. This GMO rennet is not labeled as such due to being deemed safe, raising concerns about its effects on health. Research suggests potential toxicity and allergenicity. Look for cheeses made with traditional rennet or vegetable rennet to avoid genetically modified options.

The video discusses the numerous benefits of raw milk, particularly in the form of kefir, for the human gut. It highlights how raw milk can repair damage caused by antibiotics and other harmful substances, and how it supports the gut microbiome and immune system. The safety and cleanliness of raw milk are emphasized, along with the importance of state standards and the need for the FDA to acknowledge its safety. The video also touches on the innovation and intentionality behind farm practices, including the production of truly raw cheese. Personal testimonies highlight the positive impact of raw milk on health, and the importance of prioritizing prevention and whole food nutrition.

Most people are unaware that the milk sold in supermarkets is pasteurized, which kills the enzymes that cause spoilage. This allows the milk to last for months. Pasteurization is done for financial reasons. Smart individuals believe that raw foods are superior, but the government opposes this because raw foods don't make you sick like processed foods do. Processed foods are preserved because they are already dead.

The speakers discuss the difficulty of finding raw milk and the legal restrictions surrounding it. They mention that some people have been arrested for having whole milk, which they find preposterous considering the ease of buying whiskey. The reasons for pasteurization and homogenization are discussed, including health concerns and shelf life. The speakers mention a small raw food club that was raided for sharing raw milk. They question the priorities of federal agents and highlight the benefits of raw milk, such as better taste and easier digestion. The conversation also touches on the French tradition of unpasteurized cheese and the overall health of the French population.

A PopSugar article questions the safety of beef tallow in skincare, citing its lack of FDA approval. The speaker argues that historical use by various cultures suggests safety, regardless of FDA approval. The article mentions a lack of clinical studies confirming tallow's benefits, but the speaker claims that pharmaceutical companies lack incentive to study tallow due to its unpatentable nature. The article warns of a theoretical risk of mad cow disease, which the speaker dismisses as a scare tactic, given the low risk of contracting it from beef and the separation of proteins (the infectious agent) from fats during tallow rendering. The speaker concludes that tallow is safe, rich in beneficial vitamins, and has a history of traditional use, contrary to the article's recommendation of pharmaceutical-grade moisturizers.

In this video, Mark McAfee, owner of the largest raw dairy farm in the world, discusses the benefits of raw milk, particularly in the form of kefir, for gut health. Raw milk contains antibodies and immune system support found in colostrum, nourishing and protecting the gut. Despite FDA restrictions on claims about its healing properties, numerous studies support its benefits for gut health and immune function. The speakers also highlight the safety and cleanliness of raw milk, emphasizing its differences from commercially processed milk. They discuss the importance of state standards and regulations, as well as the positive impact of raw milk on conventional dairy farmers' livelihoods. The production of raw cheese and its unique qualities are also discussed. The video concludes by emphasizing the need for better education and understanding of raw milk's benefits in human nutrition.

In the 1930s, milk production became more industrialized. State government supported the move toward pasteurization and passed laws making raw milk nearly impossible to obtain. But you'll never guess who was one of the forerunners for this pasteurization movement: the Rockefellers. In 1933, Rockefeller Dairy patented new and expensive industrial machinery with the purpose of pasteurizing milk. The Rockefellers needed demand for their machinery, and they sought it by making pasteurization mandatory by law. With wide governmental contacts and wealth, the Rockefellers managed to lobby a new law. This law stated that all milk should henceforth be pasteurized. This caused outrage among small farmers, who protested the law. These farmers had no way of affording the expensive pasteurization machinery, which was now required by law.

Raw milk's restricted access contrasts sharply with alcohol's legality and widespread availability, despite alcohol contributing to over 100,000 deaths annually in the U.S. This disparity suggests health and safety are not the primary concerns driving raw milk regulations, implying ulterior motives behind its prohibition.

We don't pasteurize our milk because our cows eat grass and live in a clean environment. This affects their bloodstream's pH and the milk quality, making it biologically active with enzymes that aid digestion, offering more benefits. In contrast, confined dairy cows eat grain, altering their pH and increasing harmful bacteria in their milk. Pasteurization, or boiling, kills everything, but also removes the good elements, making it harder to digest. Raw milk from these cows would be dangerous. Our grass-fed cows have beneficial bacteria, similar to yogurt, which is healthy. Interestingly, our milk has a longer shelf life than pasteurized milk because it doesn't sour like conventional milk when it goes bad.

Many people are scared of the idea of trusting strangers and different countries with our food. However, not too long ago, people used to produce their own food without relying on grocery stores. It is now more socially acceptable to trust others with our groceries, but this concept still scares people. They are confused and don't understand the importance of this. It is about our health, control, power, self-sufficiency, and independence.

Raw milk is banned in many places due to safety concerns, yet neon blue energy drinks are considered safe for children. This raises the question of whether the issue is truly about safety or about control. Obtaining milk directly from the source and feeding one's family without relying on a barcode poses a problem because it means no longer being a customer. This loss of customer status is the real threat.

Speaker 0 discusses one of the best books, The Recipe for Living Without Disease by Ajanas, and shares that they’ve been eating raw meat for eight months after discovering this work. They claim that Ajanas had diabetes, skin issues, angina, and autism, and that all of these were completely reversed by a raw food diet. They argue that people heat, cook, irradiate, and process their food and then wonder why they have health issues. They assert that there is so much bacteria in food, and that because you are made up of bacteria, cooking or irradiating food makes it sterile and “makes you sick.” The point is made more deeply by noting Eskimo diets: they allegedly ate 99% raw meat from caribou, fish, seal, moose, bear, and whale, and had no disease at all until cauldrons and processed foods were introduced to their area. The speaker mentions Doctor Potinger, who reportedly had 900 cats fed all raw meat and raw milk; none of these cats had health issues, did not need dewormers, and were healthy, whereas giving them processed kibble produced negative outcomes. They then provide examples of raw foods: raw fruit, raw meat, raw butter, raw cream, raw dairy, raw vegetables, and raw milk, labeling raw as “great things.” The overarching claim is that raw foods lead to better health and that “raw is the law,” with personal testimony that raw consumption makes people feel very good.

Milk is banned in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Japan, and the EU because cows were given the synthetic hormone RBGH to increase milk production. Public concern led to reduced milk consumption and some manufacturers discontinued its use.

We don't pasteurize our milk because our cows eat grass and live in a clean environment. This creates milk that is biologically active, containing enzymes that aid digestion, offering more health benefits. In contrast, confinement dairies feed their cows grain, altering the cow's pH and increasing harmful bacteria in the milk. Pasteurization, while killing these bacteria, also destroys beneficial elements and makes the milk harder to digest. Our grass-fed cows produce milk with good bacteria, similar to what you'd find in yogurt. Interestingly, our milk lasts longer than pasteurized milk because it doesn't spoil. Instead, it naturally ferments, turning into kefir, yogurt, and eventually cheese. So, while it changes over time, it doesn't go bad as long as it's kept at the right temperature.

I switched to almond milk 7 years ago when I discovered I was lactose intolerant. I noticed my symptoms cleared up when we ran out of regular milk at home. So, I started drinking almond milk and didn't think much of it. However, I still felt bloated and unwell even with a small amount of milk. That's when I considered trying raw milk. The first time I had it, I stared at the glass for 10 minutes, thinking I hadn't had milk in ages. Surprisingly, I had no issues with it. The difference between raw and pasteurized milk is significant. It turns out I'm only intolerant to pasteurized milk.

Milk produced in the US is banned in Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and the EU due to the growth hormone RBGH given to cows. This hormone is deemed harmful to health, leading to its ban in these countries. Despite Europe banning RBGH years ago, US regulatory authorities still approve its use annually.

People drink raw milk because it helps their immune systems adapt to threats. Studies in Europe show that children who consume raw milk are less likely to catch the flu or colds over a decade. Unlike vaccines that change yearly, raw milk evolves as cows adapt to their environment, producing antibodies for new strains. This natural process highlights the importance of prioritizing nature over pharmaceuticals. In America, the gut microbiome is suffering, and fear often drives health decisions. It's crucial to move away from fear-based thinking regarding health.

The other part of it is the reason people drink raw milk is so their immune systems are adaptive to threats. The studies in Europe are very clear about that. The kids that drink raw milk don't get the flu and don't get the cold. Those are viruses. Every year they don't get that for ten years of the study. They're not taking a vaccination that changes every year. They're taking raw milk that changes every year because the cows adapt to that year's environment and that year's virus and creates antibodies for the new strain every year. So Mother Nature's blueprint has got this going on, and she's right. We just have to appreciate that and be farmers over pharmacies here. And America is such a bad way with our gut microbiome and immune compromise that fear is an easy thing to manipulate. So we have to not go there with the fear. It's just sad.

The speaker questions the assumption that raw milk consumption is inherently unsafe. They state that approximately 760 people in the US get sick from raw dairy annually, and two deaths were reported between 1993 and 2012. This is compared to leafy greens, which allegedly cause around 2.3 million illnesses each year in the US. Raw milk purportedly contains more bioavailable nutrients and supportive enzymes that are destroyed during pasteurization, making it easier to digest. The speaker also claims that cows producing raw milk are typically grass-fed, resulting in healthier and happier animals. They conclude by encouraging listeners to drink raw milk.

Research suggests children who consume raw milk, as opposed to pasteurized milk, experience a lower incidence of asthma, allergies, ear infections, eczema, and respiratory infections. Raw milk is claimed to offer greater immune system support because pasteurization destroys many immune factors.