TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses declassified documents from the Biden administration designating potential violent domestic extremists. These documents allegedly identify individuals as likely to turn to violence based on ideologies connected to opposing Biden administration policies. Examples include opposition to COVID vaccine and mask mandates, concerns about forced vaccination of children in schools, and disagreement with Biden's border policy. The speaker connects these documents, issued in December 2021, to President Biden's 2022 speech warning that Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans pose a threat to the republic. They also link it to alleged FBI directives to social media companies to censor Americans to prevent the spread of domestic violent extremism. The speaker concludes that this represents the weaponization and politicization of the intelligence community against the American people.

Speaker asserts that the displayed events are not January 6 but include 05/31/2020 in front of the White House, when the president was ushered into a bunker; 07/27 in Portland, described as Antifa rioting; more rioting in Salt Lake City; and 06/01/2020 on the streets of DC. "Where was the hotline?" The speaker argues, "This is what domestic terror looks like." Noting "This is not a school board meeting," they say "There is no hotline for any of these rights, and we are gonna have a hotline that's going to report parents for caring about their children's education." They claim, "the DOJ would rather investigate a thousand more people from January 6 than any single person in these photos. What a shame." Concluding, "This is no longer the department of justice. It is the department of subjective justice."

John Sable, founder of Patriot Voice and a disabled Navy veteran, is suing the ADL for including him in their glossary of extremism and hate. Sable claims the ADL didn't research him and relied on salacious articles to justify his inclusion, negatively impacting his and his partner's finances. He says the ADL has power over financial institutions and social media, leading to cancellation of his accounts. Sable believes the ADL has a left-wing bias and targets conservatives, especially during the Biden administration, and trains the FBI. He is concerned about the ADL's influence on government institutions and intelligence agencies. Sable advises others targeted by similar organizations to take legal action. His lawyer notes that the ADL tried to dismiss the case, but two major defamation claims remain, related to the "Hate in the Lone Star State" article and the glossary. Sable and his lawyer argue that the ADL presents its list as factual, not opinion, and that this has damaged Sable's reputation and career prospects. They believe the ADL acts as a forward scout for the government, targeting ideological enemies. They hope the lawsuit will open the door for others to take action against similar organizations.

"The PYM has cosponsored 450 anti West rallies in The United States." "Al Quds, one of PYM's partners, hosted the largest anti West rally in Toronto showcasing a swastika interlaced with the Star of David." "Nadia Tanus have called for the destruction of the West. To strike at the heart of empire." "Lina Assi has a history of hatred toward Western values." "Laila is a Palestinian terrorist and activist associated with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine." "Palestine Legal is a legal aid organization supporting the movement for Palestinian freedom in The US, and they've received over 2,000 requests for legal support just last year." "And guess who funds Palestine legal? None other than George Soros through the Tide Center." "The Tide Center administered 24,500,000 in USAID grants." "They landed on an NGO called Honor the Earth who specializes in dismantling settler colonialism and racial capitalism."

They oppose the NAACP and Project 2025, aiming to restrict voting rights, ban abortion, prosecute political foes, cut social security, Medicare, and education funding. They threaten healthcare coverage, prevent Medicare from negotiating drug prices, and favor the wealthy with tax breaks.

Speaker 0 says they will pursue charges in this case and see various crimes that have occurred, with the FACE Act mentioned as one predicate. He notes that the Biden DOJ used the Klan Act conspiracy charges tacked onto the FACE Act in cases of protests outside abortion clinics to bring longer sentences, and that there are a number of tools available. He asks who funded the operation and what other crimes may have occurred, including possible use of wires or the mails, and whether anyone crossed state lines—all potential predicates for additional federal charges. Speaker 1 responds, saying he pulled up the Klan Act, the 1871 Enforcement Act (Force Act) designed to counter the Ku Klux Klan and protect African American voting rights, and provides an explanation of its context. He describes the Klan Act as a law that makes it illegal to terrorize citizens or violate their civil rights, or to conspire to violate civil rights. He explains it is often used against law enforcement but now used against others as well. When anyone conspires to violate protected civil rights, the Klan Act can be used to bring a conspiracy charge. He explains that the Biden administration has treated actions as a violation of the Klan Act and a conspiracy to violate civil rights, turning a potential misdemeanor under the FACE Act into a felony under the Klan Act. He cites the example of potential actions by “three grandmas” praying outside an abortion clinic being treated as a conspiracy to violate the civil rights of women seeking abortions. Speaker 0 adds that President Trump pardoned the pro-life protesters in those cases. He notes he recently defended successfully in the Eleventh Circuit a case called Ora Pesa, involving Jane’s Revenge protests against crisis pregnancy centers in Florida, where the court upheld the Klan Act criminal enhancement to the FACE Act. He acknowledges this is technical, but emphasizes that FACE Act is just the starting point, with additional charges such as material support for disruptive activities, conspiracy to violate civil rights, and potentially the use of other instrumentalities to commit crimes. He asserts that some involved individuals have identified themselves, stating Don Lemon claimed he knew what would happen inside the facility and proceeded to “commit journalism,” implying involvement in a criminal conspiracy. Speaker 0 concludes that they are gathering facts and that this is a very serious matter. He warns that come next Sunday, no one should think they can get away with this in the United States. He states that everyone in the protest community should know that the fullest force of the federal government will come down to prevent this from happening and to put people away for a long time.

The weaponization of the justice department is concerning. Under Joe Biden, the department suggested that traditional Catholics could be considered domestic terrorists and indicated that individuals protesting school board policies might be investigated for terrorism. This politicization of the justice department is alarming, and we should not exacerbate the situation by allowing anyone appointed to the federal government to demand a pardon upfront. This could lead to a troubling precedent where appointments come with the expectation of immunity alongside a salary.

The speaker asks the Attorney General if the Justice Department cultivates sources and spies in Latin Mass parishes and other Catholic parishes. The speaker references a document that explores developing tripwires and sources against traditionalist Catholics, including those who favor the Latin Mass. The Attorney General calls the document appalling, states the Justice Department does not investigate based on religion, and says the FBI has withdrawn the document and is looking into how this happened. The speaker claims the memorandum cites the Southern Poverty Law Center to identify Catholics as part of hate groups and asks if the FBI uses left-wing advocacy groups to target Catholics. The Attorney General denies the FBI targets Catholics and says the memorandum is inappropriate and doesn't reflect FBI methods, stating they shouldn't rely on single organizations without doing their own work. The speaker asks how many informants are in Catholic churches across America. The Attorney General doesn't know but doesn't believe there are any informants aimed at Catholic churches, citing a rule against investigations based on First Amendment activity. The speaker accuses the Justice Department of targeting Catholics for their faith views.

The Department of Justice will be put back in the business of justice, and the civil rights division will be doubled. Law enforcement will be directed to counter extremism. Social media platforms will be held accountable for the hate infiltrating their platforms because they have a responsibility to help fight against this threat to our democracy. Social media platforms will be held accountable as a community if they profit off of hate, act as a megaphone for misinformation or cyber warfare, or don't police their platforms.

The speakers are concerned about the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which they call the "Invest in Radical Activities Act," and the EPA's distribution of $3 billion in grants. They claim that much of this money is going to groups engaged in anti-American activities, including anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, anti-police, and anti-border security stances. Specific examples include the Climate Justice Alliance ($100 million), which has allegedly glorified Hamas and denies Israel's right to exist; the NDN Collective, which calls the U.S. a "so-called country" and advocates defunding the police and military; New York and New Jersey coalitions ($50 million) that view borders and citizenship as racist; Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs ($50 million) who want to abolish police and prisons; and the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights ($1.3 billion) who advocate defunding police, decriminalizing shoplifting, and abolishing prisons. They criticize the EPA's lack of oversight and accountability, noting that the agency claims political beliefs aren't considered in grant decisions. The speakers argue that money is fungible and that funding these groups frees up other funds for political activities. They are urging the EPA not to disperse the money and plan to defund these initiatives and increase oversight when they regain control of Congress.

- "the senate judiciary committee confirmed yesterday what many of us knew had been the case. Biden era officials at the Department of Justice and FBI, politically targeting, certain individuals." - "And look, there is no room for malicious prosecution or political witch hunts in our system of justice." - "As you mentioned, on the list of almost a 100 individuals and organizations, had Turning Point USA, our own Republican Attorneys General Association, that is our political arm, was also targeted." - "Everybody at home knows what was done to president Trump. This is wrong. It's unlawful, and we're gonna hold people accountable." - "So I don't have names yet. We're gonna start at the top, and we're gonna go as broad as we can." - "We're going to use every civil and criminal tool, including civil rights violations that are at our fingertips."

The Biden administration is accused of avoiding important questions while focusing on investigating parents at school board meetings and other controversial actions. They are criticized for allegedly giving special treatment to Hunter Biden and targeting President Trump for years with various investigations and actions, including spying on his campaign, the Mueller investigation, impeachment, and more.

The Department of Justice will be put back in the business of justice, and the civil rights division will be doubled. Law enforcement will be directed to counter extremism. Social media platforms will be held accountable for the hate infiltrating their platforms because they have a responsibility to help fight against this threat to our democracy. Social media platforms will be held accountable as a community if they profit off of hate, act as a megaphone for misinformation or cyber warfare, or don't police their platforms.

There are concerns about the Southern Poverty Law Center labeling groups as hate groups, leading to financial consequences and even violence. The center's extensive fundraising and offshore accounts raise questions about their true intentions. They target organizations like the Family Research Council and the Ruth Institute, while overlooking violent groups like Antifa. This has led to criticism of the center becoming a left-wing slander machine.

The Department of Justice will be put back in the business of justice, and the civil rights division will be doubled. Law enforcement will be directed to counter extremism. Social media platforms will be held accountable for the hate infiltrating their platforms because they have a responsibility to help fight against this threat to our democracy. Social media platforms will be held accountable as a community if they profit off of hate, act as a megaphone for misinformation or cyber warfare, or don't police their platforms.

The speaker says the ADL opened a center in Silicon Valley in 2017, run by a future Facebook executive, and employs software engineers and data scientists. The ADL monitors data and collaborates with platforms like Google, YouTube, Meta, Twitter, Reddit, Steam, Amazon, Apple, and Zoom. The speaker states the ADL has worked with Twitter since its founding, engaging with both the old and new leadership, including Elon. Another speaker claims the ADL has daily meetings with social media companies, including Zoom, to censor speech. They assert the ADL is not a civil rights group, but an intelligence organization operating in the U.S. for another country.

The speaker claims that Biden's Justice Department placed mothers on FBI and terrorist watch lists for advocating against certain school curricula. They state these mothers were labeled as terrorists for their activism. The speaker urges listeners to examine the Justice Department's actions. They then mention Biden's pardon of his son and his statement that the Justice Department has been politicized.

The Attorney General was questioned about a Justice Department document that discussed exploring tripwire and source development against traditionalist Catholics, including those favoring the Latin mass. The Attorney General called the document appalling and stated the FBI has withdrawn it and is looking into how it happened. The questioner claimed the memorandum cites the Southern Poverty Law Center, which identifies Catholics as part of hate groups, and asked if the FBI targets Catholics using left-wing advocacy groups. The Attorney General responded that the FBI is not targeting Catholics, the memorandum was inappropriate, and the FBI should not rely on any single organization without doing its own work. When asked how many informants are in Catholic churches, the Attorney General said he doesn't know and doesn't believe there are any aimed at Catholic churches, citing a rule against investigations based on First Amendment activity. The questioner accused the Justice Department of targeting Catholics for their faith views and called it a disgrace.

The speaker claims the Muslim Brotherhood aims to destroy America from within using groups like CAIR, MSA, and ISNA as fronts, referencing a 1991 plan. CAIR and ISNA were allegedly unindicted co-conspirators in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial, accused of funneling money to Hamas. The speaker references CAIR's 2025 plan to fund thousands of lawyers, journalists, and influencers, and elect 50 Muslim congressmen by 2040 to reshape America. The speaker contrasts loyalty to the US with supporting Palestinian causes and denouncing America. The speaker urges the US government to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and its front organizations as terrorist entities, citing bans in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Libya, Russia, Austria, Syria, Jordan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. The speaker calls for banning the Brotherhood, revoking CAIR and ISNA's tax-exempt status, and reopening the Holy Land case. The speaker urges listeners to visit actforamerica.org to support the "Stop the Stealth Jihad Now" campaign.

Joe Biden, the DOJ, and FBI are accused of being the biggest threat to America by creating hate crime hoaxes. They are believed to want to keep us divided and are seen as the real white supremacists. Their actions are said to aim at destroying us.

I've got updates on a second story by Jeffrey Tishauer from the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) about Tom Homan and me. This guy claims to be an investigative reporter, but he's really an Antifa activist. The SPLC is like the National Enquirer of the left, and it's an oxymoron for them to talk about truth. Jeffy's doing another hit piece, trying to tie in DEI and my employer with unrelated stuff. He's mad because I called him out. I work with various groups, even helped open an African American-led GOP office. Plus, this "Nazi hunter" is targeting normal people and groups like Moms for Liberty. Tishauer is lying. I didn't meet Tom Homan at Trump's inauguration. He's also twisting my words about confronting Venezuelan gang members. He is lying about my views regarding January 6th, too. This whole thing is ridiculous.

The FBI allegedly identified traditional Catholics as a threat to America, claiming those who attend Latin mass are antisemitic and homophobic, based on information from the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). The FBI reportedly retracted the document after a whistleblower published the report. The SPLC continues to list radical traditional Catholic hate groups on its hate map, alleging antisemitism is an inextricable part of their theology. The Ruth Institute, a Catholic organization, was branded an anti-LGBTQ+ hate group for restating the Catholic Church's position on sexuality. The speaker suggests that if quoting the catechism qualifies the Ruth Institute as a hate group, the entire Catholic Church should be considered one. The Biden administration has reportedly consulted with the SPLC on domestic terror threats, and the speaker questions why President Biden, who identifies as Catholic, relies on an anti-Catholic organization.

A journalist asks if there’s someone who can be spoken to about hearing, and is directed to the other side of the park. The exchange turns into a broader set of allegations about a man named Naftali Aaron Kranz and the organization Get Free. The speaker claims Naftali Kranz is a paid protester through Get Free. They present LinkedIn posts recruiting for paid protesters for the company, described as Get Free’s “part time mobilization support contractor.” The speaker asserts Get Free bills itself as a grassroots organization while Naftali and others are allegedly paid to protest. They claim Get Free aims to “undo white supremacy” and that one of the best ways to do that, in Naftali’s view, is to celebrate vandalism, citing Crown Heights, where someone threw an egg at a stranger’s cyber truck and placed dog feces on it. The speaker contends Naftali attended an abolish the police rally but was not the leader, instead blending in among other recruits, and that he works with the DSA, explaining why the speaker met him at a DSA Tax the Rich rally. On LinkedIn, the speaker says Naftali frequently posts about paid protester roles, urging people to join to “help us expand our effort to win reparations across the country,” with recruitment across Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore. They describe a nine-week contract, part-time, paying $3,400 in stipends biweekly, seeking someone excited about experimentation who will recruit people and train them to drive turnout at events. The speaker also says Naftali is part of Jews Against Trump and urges donations to bail funds to “bail immigrants out of concentration camps,” adding a claim that a Jewish person who calls an immigration detention center a concentration camp has a serious mental illness, and criticizing colleges like NYU, the Democrat party, and mainstream media as brainwashing. The speaker asserts Nicole Cardi is at the top of the Get Free Movement and claims she says the George Floyd protests were the reason Biden won the 2020 election. They argue that protest NGO groups are about getting Democrats elected, and that donations to Get Free are funneled through ActBlue, which the speaker says is under investigation by the Department of Justice for foreign contributions. The speaker alleges ActBlue has funneled billions to activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, which is said to be orchestrating resistance to ICE agents in Minneapolis. Indivisible is claimed to have paid protesters and received over 7,600,000 dollars from the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros.

The Republican party is perceived as a party of hate by Democrats. However, Andrew Jackson and Franklin D. Roosevelt, both Democrats, were responsible for the Trail of Tears and Japanese internment camps, respectively. Ulysses S. Grant, a Republican, outlawed the KKK. The Klan was started after Reconstruction by Southern Democrats. Republicans championed women's rights, and Susan B. Anthony was a Republican. In 1964, Democrats opposed the Civil Rights Act, which was passed due to House Republicans. The speaker anticipates hateful comments and insults, asserting they lead with facts, while liberals lead with emotion.

The Biden family is accused of being corrupt, engaging in extortion, bribery, influence peddling, and tax fraud. It is claimed that executive branch agencies of the Biden administration are involved and have been weaponized to cover up these crimes. This is not a conspiracy theory, but supported by evidence. The hearing aims to expose this corruption and government cover-up. A federal court has affirmed that the White House, Department of Justice, and FBI coerced social media platforms to censor conservative viewpoints.