reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Explosives were detonated, resulting in a truck explosion outside the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas.

A neighbor, Billy Toma, witnessed a suspicious van near a rally where a former president was shot. The van belonged to the gunman, Thomas Matthew Crooks. Police found bomb-making materials and IEDs in his home and van. The security perimeter at the rally was breached, highlighting potential lapses in security. Police were investigating the incident in Bethel Park, Pennsylvania.

The vehicle vented upwards without damaging the trunk's glass doors, indicating a less effective explosion than expected. There are also unexploded components found inside. Regarding the Cybertruck, efforts are being made to recover video footage, as it is equipped with numerous cameras. There was a question about the nature of the bomb, which seemed to consist of individual incendiary components rather than a connected device. The sophistication of the bomb appears lower than what would be expected from someone with military experience. Most materials in the Tesla were likely intended to fuel a larger explosion, but it's too early to determine if there was any sophisticated connectivity among the components.

A search of the vehicle revealed a manifesto identifying many lawmakers and other officials. Alerts were immediately made to the state, who took action by alerting those identified and providing security where necessary.

We still have, basically confirmation he got shot. His right, exit out the left. If I had to guess, I would say he got hit at the base of the skull. He didn't die from blood loss. He died instantly which would mean it either hit spinal or the base of the base of the brain or either some some portion of the brain that would take everything out. So, what I'm saying is the FBI is lying. This is most likely entry somewhere in this vicinity somewhere in this vicinity, it hits bone and it projects itself outward through the neck. Keep your eye on this space here where the red circle is as the next clip plays.

The police deployed irritants in the residence where they believed the suspect was hiding. The suspect, James, is the resident of the home and is presumed to be the involved suspect. The police had only responded to noise complaints at this address in the past. Social media posts made by the suspect are being reviewed as part of the investigation. The suspect was inside the residence during the explosion and is presumed deceased. Human remains were found at the scene, and the medical examiner will identify the individual and determine the cause of death.

A search of the vehicle revealed a manifesto identifying many lawmakers and other officials. Alerts were immediately made to the state, who took action by alerting those identified and providing security where necessary.

The subject inside the vehicle was unrecognizable due to severe burns, complicating identification. However, investigators discovered several items that aid in the inquiry, including a military identification, a passport, and a Desert Eagle .50 caliber semi-automatic pistol. Many firearms found were also heavily damaged by fire. Additionally, an SLR Model B30 semi-automatic firearm was recovered, along with various fireworks. Notably, an iPhone, a smartwatch, and several credit cards in the subject's name were also found in the vehicle.

"there is a spot on the shirt. And that spot on the shirt also correlates with the very top edge of this body armor." "the first appearance of an entrance wound" "What is very clear to me is that we had a round that impact the upper edge of his body armor, and then that round deflected directly upward." "deflected directly upward and up into his cranial cavity." "I’m fairly certain that that projectile is still inside of his body." "I think Charlie was dead the moment right at impact." "there was reports that he was in critical condition, that there was a pulse."

The speaker notes that a "spot on the shirt" correlates with the "very top edge of this body armor," and identifies the "first appearance of an entrance wound," which is described as "really weird too." He states that, "When we see an entrance wound from a firearm, especially on the skin and something in an area that's soft tissue like the neck, we normally don't see such a large hole there with the entrance wound." He calls the wound "a fairly massive wound," and explains that "we had a round that impact the upper edge of his body armor, and then that round deflected directly upward," making the wound larger and likely fragmented. He notes there is no exit wound observed, since "that round hit deflect directly upward and up into his cranial cavity," and concludes, "I’m fairly certain that that projectile is still inside of his body" and "Charlie was dead the moment right at impact." He adds that there were reports "he was in critical condition, that there was a pulse."

Explosives were detonated, resulting in a truck explosion outside the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas.

The cause of death is a gunshot wound to the head, resulting in severe traumatic brain injury. Additional injuries include a missile injury to the right forearm, a masonry-related injury to the left leg, and multiple shrapnel wounds. Shrapnel wounds to the chest caused severe damage, but the gunshot wound to the head is the determined cause of death.

Colin of Project Constitution sits down with Tyler (the interviewer’s name in the transcript isn’t consistently labeled; the speaker identifying themselves as “Speaker 1”) to discuss an in-depth, ongoing investigation into Charlie Kirk’s assassination and related events. The conversation covers timeline疑s, weapon analysis, hospital logistics, key individuals (notably Erica Kirk, Tyler Boyer, Terrrell Farnsworth, Candace Owens), and alleged foreign and domestic entanglements, with a focus on unfiltered details the team has uncovered. Key points and claims from the discussion: - Initial reaction and approach to Charlie Kirk’s assassination - The team initially accepted the FBI’s narrative but began seeing inconsistencies as reports alternated about suspect custody. Within days after the shooting, the crime scene was reportedly destroyed and the grass replaced with pavers at the university where Kirk spoke. - Video analysis reportedly shows the ground position of the shooter that the FBI cropped out, leading to questions about whether the shooter’s location and the weapon’s origin were accurately represented. - Weapon and ballistics questions - The team raised red flags about the reported firearm: a 30-odd-six was described, but ballistic experts argued that such a round would likely have killed or severely injured the target differently, prompting the theory that the weapon claim did not match the injuries observed. - The investigative team posits the use of an explosion intended to mimic past assassination patterns (e.g., MLK-era examples) and argues the actual kill injuries do not align with a 30-odd-six. - The team’s conclusion, based on crime scene photos, argues the presence of black shards and shards consistent with a microphone (a Rode wireless mic) that shattered on impact; burn marks on Charlie Kirk, and similar black shard traces observed in Candace Owens’ released SUV photos are cited as corroborating evidence. - They propose that an explosion occurred in proximity to the event, with a separate high-powered rifle shot possibly emitted by a drone—suggesting a drone sniper may have fired, not a ground-based shooter, and that the supersonic crack and potential muzzle flash were not from a conventional rifle fire but from a bullet transitioning from supersonic to subsonic speeds, creating a pressure cone. - Hospital choice and post-event handling - Charlie was taken to Tipanogos Hospital rather than a closer facility. Officials reportedly claimed this was to access a higher-grade trauma center, but the timeline questions why the closer hospital wasn’t used and how the decision was made in real time. - A witness (a landscaper at Tipanogos) described the sequence of events: an SUV delivering Charlie Kirk to the hospital, then a second SUV with Mikey McCoy entering through a doctor entrance and leaving, raising questions about who was picked up and where those individuals went afterward. - The FBI reportedly confiscated hospital security camera footage, which the team views as suspicious in a non-crime-scene context. - Candace Owens’ show highlighted an allegation that a surgeon attempted to access the body before Erica Kirk could see it; the surgeon allegedly faced FBI resistance to re-enter the patient area. There is a contested claim about “Superman neck” and whether the surgeon ever stated such language. - Erica Kirk: background, ties, and credibility - Erica is described as potentially military-trained and highly prepared; the team explored her past, tying her to Liberty University’s Falkirk Center and alleged trafficking connections, and to Romanian networks. They assert a pattern of deception—multiple inconsistent stories about how Erica and Charlie met, and extensive past relationships with multiple former partners. - They accuse Erica of deleting past social media and press content, pressuring photographers, and hiding past associations. - The team claims Erica has ties to a broader “Mormon Mafia” network tied to Mitt Romney, with connections to Utah and Arizona. They assert ties to CIA and other security entities, and claim involvement in trafficking and political influence networks. - Tyler Boyer, Terrell Farnsworth, and family/political entanglements - Tyler Boyer is described as deeply connected to the “Mormon Mafia” and as someone who previously ran Turning Point, with shell companies enabling political and charitable activities. The interview alleges he conducted surveillance on Colin and has conflicts of interest in Charlie Kirk’s case. - Terrell Farnsworth and his family connections are described as deeply entrenched in the network; Farnsworth’s stepfather reportedly held a senior position at Duncan Aviation, connected to alleged assassination logistics; Michael Burke (Farnsworth cousin) is identified as a top prosecutor connected to Tyler Robertson’s defense. - The discussion highlights a potential conflict of interest: Farnsworth’s cousin is the defense attorney for Tyler Robertson, creating a potential conflict, given Farnsworth’s role in the case and as a witness who allegedly handled the crime scene (removing SD cards and contaminating evidence). - Investigative aims and future directions - The team seeks a complete timeline that identifies every participant’s role and actions, both to present to the public and to pursue potential legal recourse. - They propose a documentary or comprehensive public analysis to expose alleged lies and inconsistencies and to push for accountability, either through court proceedings or public discourse. - They anticipate possible outcomes for Tyler Robertson’s case (conviction via public opinion, or a plea deal) and suggest the possibility of deeper CIA involvement in the radicalization and online manipulation processes surrounding the case. - They emphasize the risk to investigators and supporters, including concerns about surveillance, shadow banning, and potential threats or actions against prominent figures involved in the investigation. - Closing sentiment - Colin reiterates the importance of citizen journalism and collaboration with Candace Owens, Sam Parker, Baron Coleman, and others in pursuing truth and accountability. The interview ends with a pledge to continue the investigation and to keep the public informed as new information emerges.

Absent any explanation, if A shoots B, the only information available is that a life was lost. With a weapon recovered at the scene, the individual was taken into custody.

The discussion highlights inconsistencies at Amy’s scene: she was right-handed, but the gun was found on the left side of her body. Confidential sources spoke on the record to other journalists, noting heavy intelligence involvement on the scene. No coroner report or autopsy has been released yet, though it’s expected to be explored during the forthcoming investigation. As Amy’s story gained public attention, Daily Mail headlines were described as misleading, contributing to a broader media spread that included CNN and Fox News. A set of texts from a man named Sam, which have since been erased, are introduced for context. One post from Sam presenting Amy’s messages describes death threats Amy had received daily for her recent work, claiming surveillance after she “crossed some line” with her independently developed theory. She mentions leaving a voice note on a hacked phone about “super, heedy shit” she had figured out, followed by ongoing “daily death threats.” She asserts she did not kill herself, telling people close to her over the past few days that it is “simply impossible to take them all out,” and asks what can be told about Sam and these texts, noting there are more. Speaker 0 explains that Sam Reid was Amy’s business partner in the Geometric Energy Corporation (GEC), formed with Sam and Chantel, and that Sam was a very close friend of Amy. The texts indicate Amy was updating him about what happened to him as well; reading the streams reveals Sam and Amy were both affected. Sam is portrayed as someone Amy relied on and trusted as a best friend, with whom she shared substantial history and company involvement. Following this, it’s noted that Sam removed the tweets, leading to questions about possible consequences for him. The speaker reflects on misleading headlines, citing an example that stated, “eleventh scientists found dead,” which mischaracterizes the situation since Amy died four years ago. The speaker refrains from speculating on Sam Reid’s motives for deleting the texts, stating they do not know him personally and that it wouldn’t be fair to speculate about his motivations. The core point remains: Sam deleted the texts, which is considered noteworthy. Fact of the matter remains that Sam erased the texts, and this action is highlighted within the discussion.

A search of the vehicle revealed a manifesto that identified many lawmakers and other officials. Alerts were immediately made to the state, who took action on alerting those identified and providing security where necessary.

A vehicle fire occurred, and a drone video shows the incident. Initially, the fire was covered with a tarp to extinguish it. After the fire department's suppression efforts, evidence was found in the back of the vehicle, including gasoline canisters, camp fuel canisters, and large firework mortars. Notably, the exterior of the truck remained mostly intact, which limited the damage inside. The vehicle was a Cybertruck, allowing most of the blast to go upwards. Remarkably, the front glass doors of the Trump hotel, parked directly in front, were not broken by the blast, as seen in the video.

Good afternoon. I'm Kevin McManhill, sheriff of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. We are providing an update on the Cybertruck explosion at the Trump Hotel. The investigation involves the FBI, ATF, and local police, and we worked through the night to gather evidence. The subject inside the vehicle has been identified as 37-year-old Matthew Lippelsberger from Colorado Springs, though we await DNA confirmation due to severe burns. Evidence includes military ID, a passport, firearms, and credit cards. He had a gunshot wound before the explosion, suggesting a possible suicide mission. We tracked his route from Colorado to Las Vegas, where he arrived shortly before the explosion. The investigation is ongoing, and we are exploring potential connections to similar incidents. We encourage anyone with information to contact the FBI. Thank you.

A search of the vehicle revealed a manifesto identifying many lawmakers and other officials. Alerts were immediately made to the state, who took action by alerting those identified and providing security where necessary.

CCTV footage shows the individual alone, not communicating or mingling with anyone. He was writing the last days of his life on his own terms, according to his own plan. This is obvious now with the benefit of hindsight.

The suspect changed his work schedule before attending a Trump rally with a rangefinder. Security noticed him observing countersniper positions. When confronted by police, he pulled out an AR 15 gun and opened fire. His car contained remote controlled bombs, a bulletproof vest, and ammunition. It is unclear what his intentions were.

A search of the vehicle revealed a manifesto identifying many lawmakers and other officials. Alerts were immediately made to the state, who took action by alerting those identified and providing security where necessary.

The coroner's office revealed that the individual had a gunshot wound to the head before the vehicle exploded. One of the handguns was located at his feet inside the vehicle.

During the engagement, the suspect was armed with a nine millimeter Glock handgun and shot at officers striking a patrol vehicle four times. Two bullets struck the top portion of the windshield, one in the right front passenger side tire causing it to deflate, the other bullet struck the front right portion of the bumper.

there is a spot on the shirt. And that spot on the shirt also correlates with the very top edge of this body armor. the first appearance of an entrance wound. A lot of times with these smaller caliber wounds, even up to 30 cal, it's hard to see a entrance wound at all. I never saw that exit wound. I think it's because basically we had that round hit deflect directly upward and up into his cranial cavity. I'm fairly certain that that projectile is still inside of his body. I think Charlie was dead the moment right at impact. what is very clear to me is that we had a round that impact the upper edge of his body armor, and then that round deflected directly upward.