reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the recent election results, describing the anticipated "Red Wave" as more of a "red ripple." Key races remain undecided, particularly in Georgia, where a runoff between Herschel Walker and Rafael Warnock is expected, and in Arizona, where Kari Lake is trailing Katie Hobbs but with significant votes still to be counted. Florida's Ron DeSantis exceeded expectations, winning by 20 points, while John Fetterman won comfortably over Dr. Oz in Pennsylvania. The GOP is still projected to take the House, but Democrats performed better than expected, losing some seats but gaining others. Political analysts Charles C.W. Cooke and Jeremy Peters join to dissect the results. Cooke argues that the election was a disaster for Republicans, given the political environment, and emphasizes the importance of candidate quality, noting that weak candidates like Walker and Oz lost winnable races. Peters highlights that the election reflects a divided electorate, with voters rejecting both parties' extremes. He notes that abortion rights significantly influenced voter turnout, particularly in states like Michigan. The discussion shifts to Trump’s influence on the GOP, with Cooke suggesting that Trump’s candidates underperformed and that Republicans may be ready to move on from him. DeSantis is viewed as a potential future leader, having successfully governed Florida and appealing to a broader voter base. The conversation also touches on the implications of the election for Biden's agenda, with Republicans poised to investigate various issues if they control the House. As the show concludes, local reporters provide updates on the ongoing counts in Arizona and Georgia, emphasizing the complexities of ticket splitting among voters. The hosts and callers express mixed feelings about the election outcomes, with many Republicans calling for a change in leadership and strategy moving forward.

Megyn Kelly opens the show expressing her optimism following the recent election results, highlighting staffing announcements from Donald Trump that particularly excite her regarding immigration. She critiques the left and corporate media for their miscalculations and anticipates forthcoming revelations about Kamala Harris's campaign failures, suggesting her team will blame President Biden for their shortcomings. Kelly predicts that Biden's team will retaliate by leaking damaging information about Harris. The discussion shifts to the Democratic Party's failures, with Kelly referencing a Washington Post piece analyzing why Biden and Harris lost to Trump. The consensus points to Biden's poor leadership and Harris's inability to connect with voters. Kelly notes that while campaign managers are being blamed, Harris herself has not faced direct criticism, indicating a reluctance to hold her accountable. The conversation highlights the disconnect between the Democratic Party's messaging and the concerns of voters, particularly regarding inflation and immigration. Emily Jashinsky and Eliana Johnson join Kelly to dissect the Democratic Party's issues, emphasizing that the party's failure to address voters' priorities—like the economy and immigration—contributed to their electoral losses. They argue that Harris's campaign was plagued by ineffective messaging and a lack of connection to the electorate. Jashinsky points out that Harris's focus on cultural issues alienated many voters, while Johnson stresses that the party's elite connections hindered their understanding of the electorate's needs. The hosts discuss the implications of Trump's recent appointments, particularly Tom Homan as border czar, and the significance of immigration as a priority for the new administration. They express excitement about potential changes in Senate leadership, with a focus on Rick Scott as a candidate who aligns with Trump's agenda. The conversation concludes with reflections on the Democratic Party's identity politics and the challenges they face in reconciling their messaging with the concerns of average voters, particularly regarding cultural issues like transgender rights. Kelly emphasizes the need for the Democratic Party to address these issues honestly to regain voter trust, while also acknowledging the ongoing divisions within the Republican Party as they navigate leadership elections and align with Trump's agenda.

The podcast hosts critically discuss Kamala Harris's apparent presidential aspirations, expressing strong skepticism given her past electoral failures and perceived inauthenticity. They argue that Harris's political approach, characterized by poll-tested statements and a lack of genuine engagement in current political struggles, disqualifies her in the eyes of the Democratic base. The hosts contend that the base is increasingly disillusioned with traditional party elites and media, evidenced by the rising support for populist figures like Zohran Mamdani and Graham Platner, who are seen as more actively fighting for their constituents. A significant portion of the discussion focuses on a perceived shift in the Democratic Party's platform between 2012 and 2014. Analysis of party documents reveals a drastic decrease in mentions of economic terms like "jobs," "middle class," and "economy," while terms related to cultural and identity issues such as "equity," "LGBT," and specific racial groups saw massive increases. The hosts argue that this pivot towards cultural identity politics, initially used by liberals to counter populist movements, has alienated working-class voters and led to the adoption of unpopular policy positions, contributing to electoral losses. The hosts express doubt that the Democratic Party has learned from these mistakes, contrasting their data-driven, centrist approach with Donald Trump's success in selling a forceful, narrative-driven story despite holding unpopular positions. They highlight upcoming elections, including the midterms and the 2028 presidential race, as crucial tests for the party's future direction and its ability to embrace a more populist, economically focused message that resonates with a broader electorate, rather than relying on established "machines" and consultants.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing Tucker Carlson's departure from Fox News, highlighting the ongoing fallout and the media's attempts to undermine him. Guests Michael Brendan Dougherty and Noah Rothman share insights on the situation, noting that Carlson's private messages, including disparaging remarks about colleagues, contributed to his termination. They discuss how Fox News management, particularly communications head Irina Briganti, has a history of targeting employees who leave the network, suggesting a pattern of destructive behavior towards former staff. Dougherty mentions that Carlson's legal battles over his contract and potential non-compete clauses will be significant, indicating that Fox is preemptively shaping public perception against him. Rothman adds that Carlson's unpredictable nature and refusal to align with Fox's editorial direction may have led to his firing, especially as the network shifts away from supporting Trump. The conversation shifts to Abby Grossberg, a former producer who has made allegations against Carlson, with the hosts expressing skepticism about her claims and the timing of her media appearances. They argue that her complaints reflect a broader issue of workplace culture at Fox rather than direct culpability for Carlson's firing. The discussion then transitions to the implications of Carlson's exit on Fox's ratings, noting a significant drop in viewership since his departure. The hosts speculate on the future of cable news and the challenges Fox may face in recapturing its audience without Carlson's unique influence. Finally, they touch on Joe Biden's re-election announcement and the Democratic Party's strategy, emphasizing the lack of substantive accomplishments in Biden's presidency and the challenges he faces due to his age. The hosts critique the party's reliance on negative campaigning against Republicans rather than promoting Biden's achievements, suggesting that this approach may not resonate with voters.