reSee.it - Related Video Feed

New York Times investigation says the last known missile fired by the United States in the Afghan war on August 29, which the Biden administration called a righteous strike, might have killed 10 innocent people, including seven children and a USA worker. The report shows video of Zamari Ahmadi loading canisters of water into his trunk to bring to his family, while the US military was surveilling him and thought those jugs could be explosives and that Ahmadi was communicating with Isis. The US launched a hellfire missile, obliterating the car in a dense residential neighborhood. Witnesses say Ahmadi had multiple passengers and was not related to Isis; the Times tallies 10 innocent people killed. Amadi had worked as an electrical engineer since 2006 for a California based aid and lobbying group, and his family insists he was innocent and applied for a refugee settlement in the United States.

A woman named Agaza killed her two children. She was hit by a bombing and was asked to leave, but she refused and held her children hostage.

We have witnessed countless children killed in a single strike, with screams for help. The US is aware of war crimes but continues to supply arms. Rules are being ignored, leading to a descent into chaos. The message to families of Palestinian civilians killed with US weapons in Gaza is left unanswered. Translation: We have seen many children killed in one attack, with cries for help. The US knows about war crimes but still gives weapons. The rules are being ignored, leading to chaos. There is no response to the families of Palestinian civilians killed in Gaza with US weapons.

The speaker describes a precision strike on a multistory building that targeted a specific apartment. The target was two 4-day-old babies, their mother, and their grandmother. The father was away obtaining birth certificates at the time of the strike. The speaker claims the strike utilized a low-yield JDAM missile and laser targeting, requiring reconnaissance and infrared scanning to identify the occupants. They assert the attackers knew the identities of those inside, including the newborns. The speaker alleges the strike was retaliation against Dr. Juman Arfa, the mother, for posting on Facebook about snipers targeting children. The speaker states the victims' birth certificates had just been obtained, and the father discovered their deaths at the hospital. The speaker concludes the attack was intentional, and the White House is waiting for the perpetrators to investigate themselves.

On September 6th in Konstantinivka, Ukraine, a missile struck a market, killing 16 people and injuring 30 others. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky blames Russian terrorists for the attack, and the international community supports his claims. The New York Times conducted a thorough investigation, analyzing evidence found at the scene and studying surveillance footage. They discovered that the missile came from Ukraine, not Russia, based on the direction it was launched from and the fragments found near the impact site. Additionally, journalists from the New York Times recorded a conversation moments before the attack, in which a loud noise resembling a missile launch can be heard. Burn marks near a nearby village further support the theory that a missile battery was recently installed.

Thousands of Palestinians killed in Gaza, investigation launched after finding ID card in rubble. CNN tracked survivors, analyzed satellite imagery, and consulted experts to piece together events of a deadly night. Israeli military dropped 2,000 pound bomb on warehouse where civilians sought refuge, failing to adequately warn them. Family members killed, but some survived without knowing others' fate. Story reflects brutality of war in Gaza.

Israeli warplanes targeted a house, killing all the family members inside. Witnesses claim the victims were shot at close range by Israeli soldiers. The destruction caused by the Israeli military's missile strikes and artillery shelling is extensive, leaving industrial plants and residential buildings in ruins. The Israeli soldiers have withdrawn, leaving behind scenes of devastation. The roads are destroyed, preventing ambulances from recovering decomposing bodies.

State Department spokesperson and a reporter clash over lack of evidence for Russian propaganda claims. Another exchange questions US military's assessment of civilian casualties in Syria raid. Administration admits mistake in drone strike that killed civilians. Journalists must ask questions to hold officials accountable and protect civilians, reflecting American values.

The discussion centers on contrasting narratives about the U.S.-Israel confrontation with Iran and what is actually happening on the ground and inside Iran. - Speaker 0 relays the “fog of war,” noting Western media claims that the U.S. and Israel are delivering a rapid victory in Iran, with leadership and navy wiped out and the war ending soon, referencing statements by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth that the war “should not be protracted” and will wrap up “very soon.” Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 push back, asking whether the war could spiral into a longer conflict and what the timeline may be, noting top general Dan Cain’s warning that the objectives will take time and that President Trump also suggested the operation could take weeks. - The program then goes to Tehran with Professor Syed Mohammed Morandi, a geopolitical analyst at the University of Tehran. Morandi explains the succession process after the death of the Ayatollah: the constitution provides a council of three that runs the government until the leader is chosen by the council of experts, which should happen in the next few days. In the meantime, the president, the head of the judiciary, and a representative from the Guardian Council run the state. He notes the councilors are being arranged to meet from abroad to avoid being targeted. - On the ground in Tehran, Morandi counters the idea that a rapid regime change is possible, detailing that U.S. and Israeli strikes have targeted Tehran and civilian infrastructure, including a claim that the government ordered people to leave the city and that an elementary school was bombed, killing about 165 girls in Minab. He describes a situation where rescue teams are struck again at the scene. He asserts that the U.S. and Israel are striking civilian targets and that there is a pattern of double tapping at sites like Fair Doce Square. - Morandi disputes U.S. claims of destroyed leadership and navy: he says that ships of the Iranian navy are in port, there are thousands of small speed boats prepared for asymmetrical warfare, and the U.S. has not touched them. He argues that the underground bases and missiles/drones remain intact, and that senior commanders were not all killed—only a handful. He notes that Iran is firing missiles at Israel and striking U.S. targets in the Persian Gulf, and that oil facilities and tankers could be attacked if escalation continues. He warns of an energy crisis if oil facilities are destroyed and notes that the price of energy has risen. - Regarding public sentiment inside Iran, Morandi states that there are no celebrations; instead, people are mourning. He describes gatherings across the country under missile fire, with demonstrations in Tehran despite security concerns. He shares that slogans included “We are prepared to die. We won’t accept humiliation. Death to Trump, death to Netanyahu,” and that millions were seen on the streets via his Telegram channel, though many left the city due to danger. He characterizes Western media portrayal as propaganda and says the sentiment on the ground is in opposition to U.S. and Israeli actions. - The host suggests that the Iranian perspective views this as a prolonged confrontation, with Iran prepared to sustain resistance for years because the United States is “completely unreliable.” Morandi notes that while negotiations have repeatedly failed, Iran aims to compel the U.S. and Israeli regime to recognize that military assault has consequences, including economic and political costs. - The program later notes that U.S. and Israeli figures frame the conflict as epically swift, while Morandi’s account emphasizes Iran’s resilience and long-term resistance, highlighting the discrepancy between Western media narratives and on-the-ground Iranian realities.

On September 6th, a tragic incident occurred in Constantineivka, Ukraine, where 16 civilians, including a child, were killed and 30 others injured. Initially, President Zelensky blamed Russian terrorists for targeting the market, and the international community condemned the attack. However, a thorough investigation by journalists from The New York Times reveals that the missile actually originated from Ukraine. Evidence includes on-site findings, analysis of surveillance footage, and the discovery of burn marks near a village northwest of Constantineivka. This revelation challenges previous accusations against Russia and raises questions about the true perpetrators of the attack.

The exchange centers on who is responsible for approving an asylum claim linked to an Afghan individual who was part of the Afghanistan evacuation and who was involved in a deadly incident in Washington, D.C. The dialogue is combative and procedural as members press for accountability and a straight answer. - Speaker 0 references a National Guardsman’s death in an incident involving the same individual, calling it an unfortunate accident, while Speaker 1 insists it was a terrorist act and asserts the guard member was shot in the head. The interaction escalates as Speaker 0 seeks clarification about who approved the asylum application for this person. - Speaker 0 asks plainly: “Who approved the asylum claim?” Speaker 1 responds that the asylum application was thoroughly filled out by information gathered by the Biden administration and that the asylum process was put into place under rules established by the Biden administration. Speaker 0 counters that, by implication, the Trump administration had changed the vetting process and the asylum had moved forward under those changes, prompting a dispute over attribution of responsibility. - Speaker 1 emphasizes that the evacuation of Afghanistan under Operation Allies Welcome was “thoroughly vetted by the Biden administration at that point in time” and insists that the individual’s asylum process followed the vetting and rules established by the Biden administration. Speaker 0 pushes back, pressing for a yes-or-no determination of who approved the asylum. - Speaker 2 offers a different framing, stating that the individual was vetted to serve as a soldier in Afghanistan and that this vetting standard was used by the Biden administration “as a ruse to bring him here.” He asserts that had standard operating procedures for special immigrant visas been followed, “none of the Allies Welcome people would have come to America,” attributing responsibility to President Biden. He also invokes a point of order and references a murder “that took place in DC,” insisting the prior description as “unfortunate” was inappropriate. - The dialogue includes interruptions and procedural motions: Speaker 2 asserts the comment about a murder was not a valid point of order; a separate speaker notes that the incident being discussed was not merely an “unfortunate incident” but a murder. - Throughout, the participants accuse each other of misattributing the asylum approval to the wrong administration and of altering vetting processes, with repeated demands for a straightforward answer about who approved the asylum application and persistent insistence that the Biden administration’s vetting and rules were the basis for the asylum decision. The exchange ends with procedural interjections and the continuation of the dispute over responsibility for the asylum approval and the accompanying tragic incident.

The speaker states the Taliban was killing American soldiers with snipers, so the speaker got involved with the Taliban. Abdul is the head of the Taliban, and the speaker told Abdul to stop, or there would be problems. The speaker sent Abdul a picture of his house. For 18 months, no one was killed. Mike Pompeo negotiated a good agreement for the U.S. to withdraw without losing soldiers or leaving Americans or $85 billion in equipment behind. The speaker claims the agreement required certain actions, but "they" didn't do them, so the agreement was terminated. The speaker believes "these people" executed the worst withdrawal, causing the most embarrassing moment in American history. The speaker believes Russia attacked Ukraine because of the perceived incompetence of "she and her boss."

In August 2021, the chaotic withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan led to the Taliban's swift takeover of Kabul. Amidst the turmoil, a suicide bomber attacked Abbey Gate at the airport, killing 13 American service members, including Marine Lance Corporal Kareem Nakuoi, who saved several Afghan families. Years later, during Biden's State of the Union address, Steve Nakuoi, Kareem's father, shouted his son's name to remind the president of the tragedy. Following his outburst, he was arrested but treated well by the police. Steve expressed his frustration over the lack of acknowledgment from Biden regarding the fallen soldiers and shared his ongoing quest for answers about his son's death. He emphasized the importance of honoring the sacrifices made by service members and their families.

Breaking news: 'President Joe Biden has reportedly located those responsible for the deaths of American troops in Kabul.' In the White House War Room, General Mustard says: 'our great leader, President Joe Biden, has done it. He vowed to take care of those monsters' and 'the deadliest force.' He calls the culprit 'a true monster with complete disregard for human life' who 'needs to be wiped off this earth.' He adds: 'Let me send the coordinates any minute now and then blamo drone strikes. Drone him to kingdom come.' A speaker compliments: 'Mission accomplished, competent, compassionate, cognitive, no dementia in sight, just an all around well rounded president.' The claimed coordinates: 'The coordinates are the the White House' and 'The people responsible are located at the White House.' There is confusion: 'Oh, man. What? No. Why? I don't wanna be droned.' The group argues: 'the troops were killed because they were in a Taliban controlled Afghanistan' and 'it's not like they were killed with like American weapons' and 'So you're tellin' me this is all Joe Biden's fault.'

The Israelis were using American weapons in Gaza, likely targeting civilians intentionally. Dropping 6,000 bombs daily, they killed 35,000 civilians. The speaker, an intelligence officer, was troubled by the indiscriminate targeting of Palestinian civilians made possible by US weapons. Translation: The Israelis used American weapons in Gaza, likely targeting civilians intentionally. Dropping 6,000 bombs daily, they killed 35,000 civilians. The speaker, an intelligence officer, was troubled by the indiscriminate targeting of Palestinian civilians made possible by US weapons.

US intelligence has gathered information that Russian intelligence officers offered to pay bounties to Taliban fighters for killing American soldiers. Multiple news outlets, including NBC News, the New York Times, AP, Washington Post, CNN, Wall Street Journal, and ABC News, have reported on this. The White House is facing another Russia scandal, with accusations of the president disregarding intelligence reports about the bounties. Some individuals express their disgust and concern, particularly as parents of soldiers deployed in the Middle East. However, the Biden administration now states that the intelligence on Russian bounties is inconclusive, and the military previously had difficulty corroborating this information.

He has witnessed numerous children killed in one attack, calling for help. The US knows war crimes are happening but still supplies arms. Despite this, there's no reason to change how we assist Israel. By doing this, we're disregarding rules and causing immense suffering. What do you say to the families of Palestinian civilians killed by US weapons in Gaza? Translation: The speaker highlights the high number of children killed in a single strike and questions the US's continued supply of arms despite knowing about war crimes. The speaker also raises concerns about the impact of these actions on Palestinian families in Gaza.

Apache helicopter gunships fired on cars driving towards Gaza, with pilots reportedly aware some vehicles carried captives. Some pilots allegedly joined local WhatsApp groups to help select targets due to a lack of guidance. At least 70 vehicles were hit by attack helicopters. Concerns were raised about engaging targets without proper identification, with one person stating it's impossible to distinguish between Hamas gunmen, civilians, or hostages from the helicopter. Firing big rounds into a group of people will likely kill everyone, knowingly putting civilians at risk.