reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In the United States, medical doctors control cancer research, leading to poor outcomes. Funds raised for breast cancer research through events like 5k runs are not used for nutritional, homeopathic, acupuncture, or naturopathic research. Instead, all the money goes towards drugs and surgery, which the speaker claims are ineffective. The speaker suggests that if every girl in the country took 200 micrograms of selenium, breast cancer could be reduced by 82%. However, this is not happening because the US medical industry prioritizes profit and people are unaware of this.

The speaker discusses the relationship between profits and cancer treatment in the United States. They mention a study that found chemotherapy to be ineffective 97% of the time, but it is still used because doctors profit from it. The speaker explains how doctors receive financial incentives for prescribing chemotherapy drugs. They argue that the pharmaceutical industry has control over cancer treatment and that the medical system prioritizes drugs and surgery over alternative approaches. The speaker suggests that funding for cancer research should also go towards nutritional, homeopathic, acupuncture, and naturopathic research. They criticize the for-profit nature of the medical industry and its impact on patient outcomes.

Sugar fuels cancer, as it operates as a fermentation system reliant on it. Despite Otto Warburg receiving a Nobel Prize for his findings, the focus shifted back to chemotherapy and radiation, which do not cure cancer. This approach leads to disease management rather than finding a cure. The financial incentive lies in treating chronic conditions rather than curing them, as the profit comes from those who require ongoing treatment rather than from healthy individuals or those who have passed away.

According to the speaker, MD-directed treatments are the third leading cause of death in the United States. They claim that 15,000 Medicare patients die each month due to these treatments, yet no one is held accountable. The speaker suggests that society has been misled into believing that medical doctors are infallible. They explain that in the early 1900s, various medical practices coexisted, but after the Flexner report, the medical profession gained dominance through political and financial alliances. The speaker emphasizes that this is a significant problem, as MD-directed pharmaceutical medicine is responsible for numerous deaths. They also criticize the reliance on medical insurance, which supports a flawed system. The video concludes with a mention of a nutritional deficiency test available for a small fee.

This video highlights the challenges and controversies surrounding cancer treatment. Despite the millions of people diagnosed with cancer each year, the medical industry continues to profit greatly from conventional treatments like chemotherapy and radiation, which have limited success rates and harmful side effects. Alternative therapies such as the Hoxsey and Gerson therapies have shown promising results, but they have been suppressed and labeled as quackery by the medical establishment. The pharmaceutical industry's financial influence controls medical schools, research, and publications, preventing natural remedies from receiving a fair chance. Nutritional therapy, including Doctor Gerson's therapy, is opposed by medical associations due to its threat to pharmaceutical profits. Other alternative therapies like mistletoe and shark cartilage have also shown promise but are not widely recognized or recommended. Many potential cancer cures have been ignored or dismissed without proper scientific evaluation, leaving patients without effective treatment options. The fear of cancer and the lack of accessible and effective treatments continue to be significant challenges in society.

Sugar is the main fuel for cancer, as it operates on a fermentation system driven by sugar. Despite this knowledge, the focus shifted to chemotherapy and radiation instead of finding a cure. The current approach to cancer involves managing the disease and maintaining symptoms, which is where the money lies. The profit is not in healthy or deceased individuals, but in those who can be convinced they have a chronic condition requiring ongoing treatment.

Every early cancer detection is customer creation and fraud, with no proof that it cures anyone. The cancer industry is a $300,000,000,000 industry driven by money, with each patient bringing in between $3,000,000 and $7,000,000. If a patient doesn't have cancer, they may be given it. Cancer is not an illness but an accumulation of symptoms. Cancer rates have increased from seven percent in 1900 to fifty-six percent today, and including "the thing we cannot talk about," it's ninety-two percent. The speaker claims to have cured 66,000 cancer patients.

The speaker claims that the Rockefellers control major drug companies through their influence on directors and officials. They aim to control all aspects of biology, including hormones, glands, and genes, as part of their goal of social control and eugenics. Since 1910, John D. Rockefeller has dominated the medical industry in the US, controlling hospitals, physicians, and medications. This has led to skyrocketing healthcare costs, making it unaffordable for most Americans. Cancer treatment is particularly expensive, with an average cost of $120,000. The speaker suggests that doctors often offer costly treatments with little chance of success, leading to financial gain for the medical industry. All these monopolies are interconnected and controlled by a group of elitists known as the world order people.

Chemotherapy drugs are prescribed by doctors because they profit directly from them. Doctors buy it for $5,000, sell it for $12,000 to patients, insurance pays $9,000, and doctors keep the $4,000 difference. Chemotherapy's success rate is only 3%, yet it's used for profit. The pharmaceutical industry controls us, diverting funds from breast cancer events to drugs and surgery, neglecting other research like nutrition, homeopathy, acupuncture, and naturopathy.

In the United States, the medical industry is driven by doctors, leading to poor outcomes for cancer patients. Despite fundraising efforts like breast cancer runs, none of the money goes towards nutritional, homeopathic, acupuncture, traditional Chinese medicine, or naturopathic research. Instead, it all goes towards drugs and surgery, which are ineffective. If women focused on selenium intake, breast cancer could be reduced by 82% in one generation. However, the profit-driven nature of the medical industry prevents this from happening. Many people are unaware of this and blindly trust high-tech medicine directed by medical doctors.

Sugar is the main fuel for cancer, as it operates on a fermentation system driven by sugar. Despite this knowledge, the medical community shifted towards chemotherapy and radiation treatments instead of focusing on sugar's role in cancer. As a result, there is no cure for cancer, only disease management and symptom maintenance. This approach is financially beneficial as it targets individuals with chronic conditions who require ongoing treatment. The money lies in this middle ground, not in dead or healthy individuals.

The speaker suggests that the medical field is controlled by big pharmaceutical companies, whom they compare to a mafia. They claim that these companies create medications that have harmful side effects and keep people dependent on doctors. The speaker also believes that the more one relies on medical treatments, the sicker they become. They mention chemotherapy as a lucrative treatment, but assert that there is a cure for cancer, which they attribute to God.

Therapeutic drugs are the only drugs doctors profit directly from. Chemotherapy is used because it's profitable, not effective. The pharmaceutical industry controls us. Funds raised for breast cancer don't support alternative treatments, only drugs and surgery that don't work.

The speaker claims that the Rockefellers control major drug companies through their influence on directors and officials. They aim to control all aspects of biology, from birth to death, including hormones, glands, and genes. The Rockefellers gained control of the medical industry in 1910, leading to the current allopathic system of medicine in the US. This control has resulted in skyrocketing healthcare costs, making it unaffordable for most Americans. Cancer treatment is particularly expensive, with an average cost of $120,000. The speaker suggests that doctors often offer costly treatments with little chance of success, benefiting financially while patients suffer. These monopolies are interconnected and controlled by a group of elitists known as the world order people.

There are laws that prevent doctors from trying alternative treatments for cancer, limiting them to only proven unsuccessful methods. The speaker suggests that if this restriction could be lifted, significant progress could be made. They also imply that the pharmaceutical industry profits from this situation, as there is a lot of money to be made from drugs.

Speaker 0 contends that the medical industry operates on a foundational lie. They claim that John D. Rockefeller bought all the major universities and major media companies early on, using his money to create his own curriculum for medicine. According to this view, the only way to obtain grants was to use that curriculum for medicine, and that curriculum was based on pharmacology. The assertion continues that pharmacology was rooted in the extraction of substances from oil, and that these medicines extracted from oil were discovered to be cancer-causing. It is claimed that those in power used their influence and media reach to debunk all forms of natural therapy. The statement then alleges that any doctor who dared speak up against them was completely discredited, had their lives destroyed, and some were assassinated and killed. The speaker adds a broader maxim: whatever you need in life will control you, and if you think you need your pills, you’ll be controlled by the pharmaceutical companies and the people who control them. The message concludes with an emotional reaction, “Anyway, fucking hell. Just calm down.”

Chemo drugs are the only ones doctors profit directly from. They buy it for $5,000, sell it to patients for $12,000, and insurance pays $9,000. Doctors keep $4,000. Chemotherapy is used because it makes money, not because it works (97% failure rate). The pharmaceutical industry controls us. Money raised for breast cancer doesn't go to alternative treatments or research, only drugs and surgery that don't work.

Therapeutic drugs are unique because prescribing doctors receive a direct profit from them. For example, a doctor purchases chemotherapy for $5,000, sells it for $12,000, and after insurance pays $9,000, the doctor keeps the $4,000 difference. This profit motive raises concerns about the efficacy of chemotherapy, which reportedly fails 97% of the time. If a car manufacturer had such a failure rate, they wouldn't survive. Additionally, fundraising for breast cancer often does not support alternative treatments like nutritional research or acupuncture; instead, it primarily funds drugs and surgeries that are ineffective.

Sugar is the main fuel for cancer, as it operates on a fermentation system driven by sugar. Despite this knowledge, the medical field has shifted towards chemotherapy and radiation, which we know do not cure cancer. Instead, we have disease management and symptom maintenance, as that is where the money lies. The focus is on the people in the middle who can be convinced that they have a chronic condition requiring ongoing treatment.

The speaker asserts that the modern medical establishment is disconnected due to its focus on treatment, billing, and a high-throughput model. They suggest shifting focus towards preventative measures like school lunch programs instead of medication. The speaker advocates for addressing food as medicine, gut health, the microbiome, and environmental toxins as causes of cancer, rather than solely relying on treatments like chemotherapy. They propose using cooking classes to manage diabetes, rather than just prescribing insulin. The speaker believes a new report calls for transforming healthcare from a reactionary system to a proactive one.

In the United States, the medical industry is driven by doctors, leading to poor outcomes for cancer patients. Despite fundraising efforts like breast cancer runs, none of the money goes towards nutritional, homeopathic, acupuncture, traditional Chinese medicine, or naturopathic research. Instead, it all goes towards drugs and surgery, which are ineffective. If every girl in the country took 200 micrograms of selenium, breast cancer rates could be reduced by 82%. However, the profit-driven nature of the medical industry prevents this from happening. Many people are unaware of this and blindly trust high-tech medicine directed by medical doctors.

Sugar is the main fuel for cancer because it operates on fermentation. Despite this, the medical community has shifted focus away from this knowledge and towards chemotherapy and radiation, which are not effective in curing cancer. Instead, they focus on managing the disease and maintaining symptoms. This approach is financially beneficial as it targets those who can be convinced they have a chronic condition requiring ongoing treatment.

The speaker outlines a version of the biological colonialism argument, referencing Jeffrey. The argument traces five hundred years of wealth accumulation by powerful nations: European ships with soldiers and guns arrive in the New World, take gold, enslave people, force labor in gold mines, and thereby make Europe and the UK rich. This pattern continues through neo-colonialism with unfair trade deals and, more recently, with the backing of the US military to compel third-world nations to produce goods for low cost, sustaining Western wealth. The speaker asserts that when there were no new lands left to conquer, the ruling class redirected exploitation toward the middle class in the United States and developed nations, extracting wealth through iatrogenic injury. According to the speaker, this modern form of exploitation involves the entire population injecting their children 72 times during childhood and encouraging further COVID shots for others, resulting in lifelong injury. The speaker claims that autism and other chronic illnesses generate substantial lifetime care costs, estimated at 5,000,000 to 7,000,000 dollars per child, with these costs benefiting the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital-industrial complex, and the ruling class. A concrete example is given: a middle-aged woman in Orange County, California who receives a COVID shot and develops myocarditis. Over the next five to ten years, her healthcare costs are projected to reach about 2,000,000 dollars, paid by insurance, government programs, and her family, circulating to pharma and doctors. The speaker contrasts this with the older colonial model of extracting wealth from a laborer in a gold mine, where at most about 20,000 dollars of labor could be harvested from a person. In the current model, the speaker argues that the same person could be drained of approximately 2,000,000 dollars through iatrogenic injury and healthcare costs over a decade, ultimately culminating in the person’s death. The core claim is that Western allopathic medicine has become a machine to extract wealth from the middle, working, and lower classes in the United States, enriching the pharmaceutical industry and the ruling class through iatrogenic injury. The speaker states that this crisis was already present with autism and other chronic illnesses before the COVID era but expanded in scale during the COVID epidemic, the response to it, and what they describe as junk science surrounding COVID shots.

According to the speaker, 50% of pediatricians' revenue comes from vaccines, with insurance companies like Blue Cross offering bonuses for high vaccination rates, potentially influencing doctors' recommendations. The speaker claims that pediatricians may dismiss families who want alternative vaccine schedules to protect these bonuses. The speaker alleges that 80% of doctors now work for corporations focused on revenue over patient care, creating pressure to generate funds due to medical school debt. The speaker suggests the entire system is incentivized to keep people sick, not necessarily deliberately, but through financial incentives. Insurance companies allegedly profit more from a sick population because they collect money as friction, taking a cut of revenues. The speaker claims that doctors, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies also benefit financially from people being sick, creating systemic pressure regardless of individual intentions.

The transcript presents a provocative framing of cancer treatment decisions and the influence of alternative medicine advocates. It opens with a claim that chemotherapy is widely recommended for cancer patients because oncologists receive a four to six percent commission for each treatment, implying a financial incentive behind standard cancer care. The speaker then contrasts this with the stance of a prominent monarch, referred to as the king of the United Kingdom, who is not going to undergo chemotherapy. This contrast is used to question why others would pursue chemotherapy when a high-profile leader would refuse it. Following this, the dialogue introduces a figure described as a “great fan” and loyal promoter of alternative medicine, who is depicted as consistently opposed to chemotherapy. This individual is characterized as someone who believes strongly in natural remedies, herbs, potions, and related approaches rather than conventional medical treatments. The speaker suggests that this person’s position aligns with a broader skepticism toward chemotherapy as a conventional option. The conversation then pivots to encourage readers or listeners to explore a specific book: A World Without Cancer, The Story of B 17 by G. Edward Griffin. The transcript explicitly mentions the book as a recommended source of information, signaling that it presents an alternative view on cancer and treatment. Within the discussion of alternatives, seeds containing “B 17” are highlighted as potential natural solutions. The seeds named include apricot seeds, cherry seeds, and plum seeds, with the claim that all contain B17, which is framed as a natural remedy in place of radiation and in opposition to what the speaker characterizes as an industry’s commission-based approach. Throughout, the speakers emphasize a preference for natural or non-traditional remedies over the conventional chemotherapy route. The language conveys skepticism about chemotherapy, suggesting a conflict of interest in the standard medical system, and promotes B17-containing seeds as a viable alternative, linking them to both the non-use of chemotherapy by the king and the endorsement of a book that supports these views. The overall message presented is that chemotherapy is driven by financial incentives, while there are natural, seed-based alternatives advocated by proponents of natural medicine, with a notable emphasis on the book by G. Edward Griffin as a source of justification.