reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In the exchange, Speaker 0 questions whether US citizens are being surveilled today and whether the photos and data of protesters are being collected and stored in some kind of database. The interlocutor, Speaker 1, repeatedly denies these possibilities. The dialogue centers on the idea of monitoring and database tracking of protesters or Americans. Speaker 0 begins by asking: “Are you surveilling US citizens today?” to which Speaker 1 responds: “No, sir.” The line of questioning then shifts to the handling of protesters: Speaker 0 asks whether “those people protesting,” who are exercising their First Amendment rights, have had photos taken and data collected and whether that information is being placed in any kind of database. Speaker 1 answers, “There is no database for protesters, sir.” This establishes the asserted position that protest-related data is not being accumulated in a dedicated database. The discussion then foregrounds a specific allegation from Maine: Speaker 0 references “one of your officers in Maine” who said to a person protesting, “we're gonna put your face in a little database.” The implied question is about the meaning and existence of such a “little database.” Speaker 1 reiterates: “No, sir.” He adds, “We don’t.” This underscores the claim that there is no database for Americans or protesters. Speaker 0 presses further by asking, “Then what do you think your ICE agent was doing to this individual when he said those statements?” In response, Speaker 1 acknowledges an inability to speak for the individual officer but reiterates the core assertion: “I can't speak for that individual, sir, but I can assure you there is no database that's tracking United States citizens.” He closes with a direct reaffirmation, “There is no database that's tracking United States citizens.” Throughout the exchange, the central claims remain consistent: there is no surveillance program targeting US citizens in the form of a database, and there is no database for protesters. The dialogue also highlights a contrast between specific statements attributed to an officer in Maine and the official denial of any such database, with Speaker 1 insisting that they cannot speak for the individual officer while maintaining that no tracking database exists for US citizens.

A congressperson is advocating for the release of Abrego Garcia, who they claim was unjustly detained. They state that they asked the Vice President of El Salvador for a meeting, phone call, or video call with Abrego Garcia, but all requests were denied. The congressperson plans to ask the American embassy to request a phone call between Abrego Garcia and his family. They claim the Trump administration is lying about Abrego Garcia, and that government lawyers admitted in court it was a mistake to detain him, but the lawyer was put on administrative leave for telling the truth. A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to bring Abrego Garcia home, and the Supreme Court voted nine to nothing for his return. The congressperson is asking the President of El Salvador to release Abrego Garcia. They are concerned about his health and want to ensure justice. The congressperson also mentions the Trump administration is reportedly paying El Salvador $15 million to house people sent from the U.S., and questions why U.S. taxpayers should pay to detain someone illegally abducted from the U.S. and charged with no crime.

Abrego Garcia's situation is unsustainable and unjust. Despite promising his family, a meeting with Abrego Garcia was not facilitated. A request to speak with him by phone to check on his well-being for his family was also denied, though it might be possible through the American embassy. The Trump administration is allegedly lying about Abrego Garcia, who was mistakenly taken due to an administrative error. The administration reportedly put the lawyer who admitted the mistake on administrative leave. A federal judge stated there was no legal authority to arrest, detain, or send him to El Salvador. The judge ordered the Trump administration to bring him home, and the Supreme Court voted nine to nothing to facilitate his return. The government of El Salvador is asked not to detain Abrego Garcia, who was illegally abducted and charged with no crime. There are concerns about his health, which is why a meeting was requested. The speaker will keep pressing for his release. Congress has a role in securing justice and may be unwilling to spend money to keep Abrego Garcia detained, especially considering the Trump administration may pay El Salvador $15 million to house people sent from the U.S.

I know every video that I make about this topic is going to get suppressed, but I literally do not care because I think it's that important. There is something seriously wrong here that needs to be looked at. It is being completely overlooked that there is a man who is part of our current administration who is in a long-term relationship and has a child with a model who he has been representing since she was a teenager and also appeared on Jeffrey's flight logs when she was just 17 years old. Here are the cliff notes I’m sharing to explain why this is very alarming. Paulo Zampoli works in our current administration, is on the board of the Kennedy Center, and has been a close friend and advisor and business partner to our sitting president since the 90s. He was the modeling agent who brought Melania to The United States to meet Donald Trump originally, and they would go on to be married. Right around the same time in the late nineties, both Paulo and Donald Trump would open their own modeling agencies, and both agencies would face claims and accusations of r word s a theft of wages, overcrowded apartments where the models would be housed, exploitation, and visa fraud. Paolo is a United Nations diplomat. From 2013 to 2014, he collaborated with Ghislain and Jeffrey’s fake oceanic nonprofit environmental organization Teramar, which allowed Jeffrey and Ghislain to make further connections and gain credibility through working with the United Nations. Through his modeling agency ID Models, he would go on to represent a Brazilian teenager named Amanda Angaro, the teenager who would appear on Jeffrey’s Flight Logs back in 2002 when she was just 17 years old. A few years after Amanda appeared on Jeffrey’s Flight Logs, Paulo would go on to date her and they would have a child together, and she would go on to also become a United Nations ambassador. They have been together romantically for nearly twenty years minus a brief moment in 2018 when they did break up. Amanda tried to leave Paulo in 2018 during Trump’s first term, but Paulo called in some favors and had her flagged through immigration so that she could not return to her home country with her son. Paulo also refused to pay her any kind of child support if she were to leave him. After this, they rekindled their relationship despite repeated allegations of infidelity and SA that Paulo has engaged in while in their relationship. Most recently, in June 2025, just a couple months back, around the time when the files became a topic of conversation again, Amanda was arrested in Miami alongside a Brazilian doctor. They were arrested for illegally operating a medical facility, grand theft, organized scheme to defraud, and illegally acquiring prescription medications to give their patients; they were allegedly offering invasive cosmetic procedures without any kind of licensing. When she was arrested, Amanda was placed on an immigration hold and set to be deported. That is the last thing we have heard about Amanda Ungaro, the longtime partner of someone who is sitting in this current administration, a longtime friend of the president who appeared on Jeffrey’s flight logs back in 2002, who is just being deported. And the day after Amanda was taken into custody, Paulo Zampoli posted this photo of himself and Pam Bondi on his social media, with no mention of Amanda at all. Amanda is no longer appearing in any of his photos afterwards. There’s been no photos with her since she was arrested, no visible concern for Amanda at all. I’m not saying Amanda didn’t do anything wrong; she is in the United States, and innocent till proven guilty. Obviously she is on the fast track to being deported, and that doesn’t make any sense from the standpoint that she is still a United Nations diplomat and should have a diplomatic passport and diplomatic immunity from arrest and prosecution in many cases. In many situations, local authorities don’t have the authority to disregard diplomatic privileges. It doesn’t make any sense how the United States is actively deporting a United Nations diplomat, and it’s not being talked about in mainstream media—regardless of the fact that she was on Geoffrey’s plane at 17 years old, went on to have a child with the agent who is supposed to be representing her, who is 15 years her senior. Putting that aside because that’s extremely relevant, the fact that they’re trying to deport a United Nations diplomat makes no sense at all. I really hope everyone sees the correlation between Donald Trump’s modeling agency, Paulo Zampoli’s modeling agency, John Casablancas’s modeling agency, Jean-Luc Brunel’s modeling agency, and how all of these men were friends of Geoffrey and each one happily gave Geoffrey access to the droves of young girls and women they had in their virtual ownership. We know for a fact that all of these men had very similar business models when it came to running modeling agencies: selling dreams to vulnerable young girls and young women, then illegally bringing them from overseas to the United States where these young girls and young women would work for them, live in housing they provided (typically overcrowded and run-down), and they would take up to 80% of these girls’ wages, leaving them at the mercy of the bosses. This wasn’t just international; it happened domestically as well. When it did happen internationally, and often domestically as well, these women and young girls would be required to attend events and parties to entertain the friends and associates of their bosses. Given the accusations against these men’s modeling agencies, it’s very plausible that a victim could be silenced, even if it means deportation when they hold the title of United Nations diplomat. I’m not saying Amanda isn’t guilty of those charges. I have no idea. There is absolutely something more to this situation. Go to the next video because I found a story that aired on the news nearly twenty years ago about Paulo Zempoli and his close friend Donald Trump, and you’re going to want to see it.

At the Tucson airport, a sign indicates that non-US citizens without passports should enter a specific line. Surprisingly, TSA allows an arrest warrant as a valid form of ID for illegal aliens. If an arrest warrant can secure a domestic flight for them, it raises the question of why it can't lead to their arrest. As a member of Congress with TSA pre-check, I must verify my identity. If my airline ticket lists my name as Wesley J Hunt, I cannot board the plane, highlighting the inconsistency in the system.

The individual in question used a false name and address. No passports have been issued to a male of that name, fitting the provided description and age profile, in Mainland Europe, America, or South America. There is no record of a Peter Bergman in any of those locations.

An individual is being arrested on a warrant for their arrest and for being in the country illegally. They are asked if they are taking any medication. The mission is described as arresting bad guys and ensuring the safety of the arresting officers.

An illegal alien from El Salvador, if returned to the U.S., would be arrested and deported again because there's no withholding order for a member of a foreign terrorist organization, and the gang he belongs to doesn't exist in El Salvador anymore. Even with a withholding order, he could be deported to a different country like Egypt. The speaker questions if the media knows the difference between a deportation order and a withholding order. A deportation order means a judge has ruled the individual must be deported and has no right to remain in the U.S. His only options are deportation to his home country or another country. The speaker claims the media seems to believe he could return to the U.S. and live there illegally, which is not an option. His only choices are to live in El Salvador or another country because he entered the country illegally.

Speaker 0 describes a national targeting center that identifies individuals who have committed crimes, either in this country or in their home country, including those with criminal charges or convictions. He states that many of these individuals are already in jails or prisons in various states, and he emphasizes the request to local law enforcement to turn these people over to federal authorities. As an example, he notes that they have asked Governor Walz and Mayor Fry to hand over criminals they have in jail, alleging that 490 murderers, rapists, and drug traffickers have been released onto the streets instead of being transferred. Speaker 1 comments that some individuals have multiple names, creating a challenge. He explains that the problem includes people who enter illegally, may not have a social security card or a passport, and for whom there is no database in their home country because it is not a friendly country. Speaker 0 adds that some individuals have lied on their paperwork to enter the country, then overstayed and failed to appear for immigration court hearings after being notified. He mentions DUIs and other incidents as part of the context. He clarifies that their approach is to target those who have committed criminal acts, and if they encounter a TDA member in an apartment with 12 other people, they will ask those other people who they are and what their identity is, just as in any other law enforcement operation. He asserts that people misunderstand that they are doing the same thing law enforcement has done for years under the Biden administration, without changes to their methods in these situations. Speaker 0 reiterates that they ask everyone present who they are and why they are affiliated, especially when surrounded by criminals, and emphasizes that their actions are consistent with established law enforcement practices.

The speakers discuss an arrest due to an outstanding immigration warrant. The detainee questions the process and duration of custody. They express frustration over perceived leniency towards unknown immigrants compared to their treatment. The officer explains the arrest warrant's basis and the detainee's lack of disclosure on their application. The detainee criticizes the officer's approach and immigration policies. The conversation ends with the officer stating they cannot comment on government decisions regarding warrants. Translation: The speakers talk about an arrest related to an immigration warrant. The person arrested questions the process and how long they will be held. They express frustration about the treatment of unknown immigrants compared to their own. The officer explains the reasons for the arrest and the person's lack of disclosure. The person criticizes the officer's actions and immigration policies. The conversation ends with the officer stating they cannot comment on government decisions regarding warrants.

Speaker 0 asks if Democrats risk playing into the president's hands by focusing on the Kilmaro Burgo Garcia case. Speaker 1 responds that they don't know of any Democrat who defended Garcia. They claim Garcia was falsely arrested and removed from the country. They allege "they" are making up things about Garcia, such as associating him with MS 13 or claiming he coordinated the January 6 attack, even though he has never been prosecuted or convicted of any crime.

I was the last person to board the plane with my regular passport. I went through immigration and they held onto my passport illegally. I told my lawyers to retrieve it. While on the plane, an immigration officer approached me and said the president wanted me off the plane because they were going to arrest me. They returned my money and my mom arrived in a wheelchair. They still held onto my passports without any arrest warrant. I can't stay idle, so I waited for another half hour until they detained me. This is all part of the leftist politics that want to turn Honduras into Venezuela, Nicaragua, or Cuba.

The speaker thanks the press office for releasing information on ICE arrests and asks why similar information isn't released for deportations to El Salvador. The response states that the Department of Homeland Security released the information. The individuals deported to El Salvador are foreign terrorists, and these deportations are counterterrorism operations, unlike the arrests and removals conducted daily by law enforcement. The speaker notes that the details provided were not released by the adjuster. The response clarifies that the deportation was a counterterrorism operation involving foreign terrorists, not illegal immigrants convicted of crimes in American communities, emphasizing that these are distinct categories with different definitions.

Leonel Oleo Moreno, a sergeant from Digesín, previously known as DIN, was sent by the government to sabotage law-abiding Venezuelans in this country. He lied about his age, falsified documents, and tarnished the image of good Venezuelans here. He was paid by the government to cause this disaster. Another individual is being monitored, and once the information is confirmed, they will be exposed and detained. Leo, the sergeant from Digesín, will provide more updates soon. Translation: Leonel Oleo Moreno, Sergeant Leo Moreno from Digesín, previously known as DIN, was sent by the government to sabotage law-abiding Venezuelans in this country. He lied about his age, falsified documents, and tarnished the image of good Venezuelans here. He was paid by the government to cause this disaster. Another individual is being monitored, and once the information is confirmed, they will be exposed and detained. Leo, the sergeant from Digesín, will provide more updates soon.

The reporter asked if there have been any negotiations between the U.S. and El Salvador regarding the release or facilitation of the release of Abrego Garcia. The response stated that El Salvador does not intend to smuggle a designated foreign terrorist back into the United States, as he is an El Salvadorian national and that is his home country. The administration intends to comply with what President Bukele said of El Salvador: he does not intend to send that individual back. The reporter followed up to clarify if that meant there have been no talks. The response reiterated that the President of El Salvador has made his position clear.

An Afghan national, who worked for the CIA in Afghanistan, was arrested for allegedly planning an election day terror plot. He was brought to the US after the collapse of Afghanistan. The reporter states that the agency claims it was through the SIV program, but the State Department denies this, stating he was never issued an SIV or immigrant visa and was paroled into the US by DHS. The reporter asks the secretary how the man was brought to the US, what screening he underwent, and what he applied for. The secretary declines to answer, stating he is there to discuss disaster relief efforts. The reporter presses, noting conflicting information from the agency and State Department. The reporter asks for assurance that appropriate steps have been taken to secure the country against threats, questioning whether the man was radicalized before or after entering the US.

Answering questions about El Salvador, an Administration Official stated that El Salvador is responsible for Abrego Garcia. However, El Salvador's President Bukele said they would not do anything with him. The official clarified that Bukele stated he would not smuggle a foreign terrorist back into the U.S. Abrego Garcia, an MS-13 gang member engaged in human trafficking, illegally entered the country, so deportation to El Salvador was the only option. He will not live peacefully in Maryland because he is a foreign terrorist and MS-13 gang member. Bukele confirmed this in the Oval Office. Garcia returned to El Salvador to face consequences for his gang affiliation and human trafficking. The official expressed dismay at the media's focus on this alleged human trafficker and MS-13 gang member.

This is about an ICE arrest attempt involving Roberto Carlos Munoz Guatemala, a convicted sex offender, on an immigration order. Per the Department of Justice, on 06/17/2025, law enforcement officers attempted to arrest him. The officers were trying to carry out ICE’s responsibilities, and this situation is described as part of what ICE officers are trying to do. The person referenced is the same officer who had been dragged during an ICE arrest just this past June and who reportedly got seriously injured. The narrative states: this officer is the same one now being demonized as a murderer by protesters, while the speaker asserts he was the one who stopped Munoz Guatemala along with his fellow ICE agents. The suspect was uncooperative and refused to follow instructions. After warning him several times, an agent—identified as the same agent involved in yesterday’s shooting—broke the back window of the suspect’s car so that the vehicle could be opened from the inside. The man accelerated his car. The account notes that the video shows it’s the same agent; the man had a mask on yesterday, but the speaker claims the same hair. As the suspect sped away, the agent’s arm became trapped between the seat and the car frame. The agent is on the driver’s side toward the back, so the footage does not show him being dragged, but it is asserted that he was dragged for more than 100 yards while the driver of the car weaved back and forth in an attempt to shake him from the vehicle. The speaker states the driver was completely immune to the thought of running over him or causing other damage. The agent was eventually jarred free from the car but suffered significant injuries to his arms and hand.

The discussion centers on the Afghanistan withdrawal and the vetting of evacuees who boarded planes. The opening exchange frames the withdrawal as a historic evacuation led by the Department of Defense and the Department of State. The senator asks specifically how many of the evacuees were vetted before they got on the plane. The official responds by stating it is the policy to vet and screen evacuees for the United States. When the senator presses for a numerical figure, the official first indicates uncertainty about Afghanistan-specific cases but reiterates the policy. The senator clarifies the question: for those who got on the C-17s and other planes, how many were vetted before they boarded, by American officials? The official replies that for those brought to the United States, it is their policy to vet and screen 100% of them. The senator pushes for a precise, testable number, asking if the answer is a sworn 100%. The official reiterates the policy and adds that all of the individuals who arrived in the United States have been screened. The senator presses further, asking for the exact percentage, and the official begins to provide a quantified estimate: well over 99% of them were fully screened and vetted before they boarded a flight. The senator seeks sources for that information, but the official continues, noting that if any were not screened before boarding, they would have been screened and vetted while in flight, and if any derogatory information was found, they would be placed in immigration enforcement proceedings and removal. The senator then asks directly, under oath, whether the 99% figure refers to all people who got on the planes in Afghanistan. The official clarifies that precision is important and notes that the question being asked concerns planes from transit countries, the third country scenario, rather than the specific Afghan departures being discussed at that moment. The senator emphasizes the focus on people who got on the planes and left the chaotic airport, asking again for the percentage vetted before they got on those planes. The official ultimately asserts that he cannot speak to those planes from transit countries, but reiterates that the discussion about those who arrived in the United States involves screening and vetting, and that those arrivals have been screened. The exchange ends with the senator acknowledging the limitation, and the official indicating that he cannot provide a detailed accounting for the transpiring circumstances of planes from transit countries, while maintaining that those who arrived in the United States were screened.

The speaker clarifies the mayor's arrest, stating the mayor was inside the facility, warned repeatedly to leave, and arrested after refusing. The arrest occurred inside, and he was cuffed after walking out. The speaker defends the HSI team, asserting they acted correctly. The speaker alleges some individuals had publicly stated intentions to enter the facility. The speaker claims the mayor broke the law and "grandstanding" won't help. The speaker confirms that the three individuals were not assaulted.

Alright, a dozen or so people exited a van outside Piedra, assisted by two NGO workers. These are illegal aliens. This is happening in broad daylight, while unaccompanied children are moved at night. Many of the 500,000 unaccompanied children brought into our country are missing or dead from organ harvesting. The people are given neon bags by a Mexican NGO and are headed to Terminal A, likely for Frontier Airlines to travel into the interior. I found two illegals escorted by a faith-based NGO out of Mexico and Texas. One was dropped at Delta. Another dozen jumped off the van and one with arrest papers is heading into TSA. Airport employees received memos about my journalism. I'm recording a male from Colombia. He couldn't provide ID, so they sent him to another line, possibly headed to Atlanta via Dallas. He was escorted through the gate without showing ID. This is Kamala Harris's America, with TSA escorting illegals into our country.

An officer is arresting a person on suspicion of modern slavery. The officer informs the person of their rights, including the right to remain silent. The person states they are a judge in their country and have immunity, also claiming to have a diplomatic passport. The officer asks if they have immunity in the arresting country and the person confirms, stating they are a diplomat. The officer says they will need to see the passport and speak to the embassy. The person then states they came to the country as a student and do not need to work.

An individual is advocating for Mr. Abrego Garcia, who they claim was unjustly taken. They state they asked the Vice President for a meeting, phone call, or video call with Mr. Abrego Garcia to assess his well-being and relay information to his family, but all requests were denied. They plan to ask the American embassy to facilitate contact. They allege the Trump administration is lying about Abrego Garcia, and that government lawyers admitted in court he was mistakenly taken due to an administrative error, but instead of correcting the error, the lawyer was put on administrative leave. A federal judge ruled there was no legal authority to arrest, detain, or deport him to El Salvador, and the Supreme Court ordered his return. They are urging the President of El Salvador to release Abrego Garcia, who was illegally abducted from the U.S. and charged with no crime. They also mention the U.S. government intends to pay El Salvador $15 million to house people sent from the U.S., and question why U.S. taxpayers should fund the imprisonment of someone illegally taken from the U.S.

An administration official stated that El Salvador is responsible for Abrego Garcia, but El Salvador's President said they will not do anything with him. The question is, who is responsible for this man and where will he end up? The official responded that President Bukele said he will not smuggle a foreign terrorist back into the U.S. Abrego Garcia is an MS-13 gang member who engaged in human trafficking and illegally entered the country. Deporting him to El Salvador was always the plan. He will not live peacefully in the U.S. because he is a foreign terrorist and MS-13 gang member. President Bukele confirmed this. He will face consequences in El Salvador for his gang affiliation and human trafficking. The official expressed dismay at the media's focus on this alleged human trafficker and MS-13 gang member.

Speaker 0 argues that the individual is late, then urges going into the capital, which is described as incitement and premeditated. The speaker asserts the person is on video stating, “we need to breach the capital” and says this is very relevant because people ended up doing it. The claim is that the individual is instigating violence, trying to provoke or catalyze illegal acts so that the government can arrest those involved, describing undercover federal assets as honeypots that goad people into committing crimes to enable arrests of people law enforcement wanted to arrest anyway. The speaker then questions if the DOJ or federal law enforcement is seeking an insurrection, conspiracy, or acts of violence aimed at undermining an act of Congress, and asks why they aren’t looking into this person, suggesting that a lack of interest implies he may be part of the government or federal law enforcement. The implication is that there could be a reason for not pursuing him other than him being unaffiliated, namely that he is working with law enforcement. Ted Cruz is described as addressing this in a Senate hearing, with the speaker plan to read a report from the New York Post. The report is quoted: “magically, mister Epps disappeared from the public posting. According to public records, mister Epps has not been charged with anything. No one has explained why a person videoed, urging people to go to the capital, a person whose conduct was so suspect, the crowd thought he was a fed, would magically disappear from the list of people the FBI was looking at.” The overall claim is that Mister Epps, who encouraged people to go to the capital, vanished from FBI attention without explanation, despite being photographed urging action and being suspected by the crowd of being a federal agent.