reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses real-time election data from SIDL in multiple states, highlighting oscillations and deletions in vote counts. They question the accuracy of projections and media calls, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in the election process. The speaker also mentions legal challenges and concerns about the media influencing election outcomes.

Donald Trump is just 4 electoral votes shy of the 270 needed to win the presidency. Currently, Alaska shows Trump leading by nearly 15 points with 56% reporting, which would give him 3 electoral votes. Additionally, he is favored to win Maine's 2nd congressional district, potentially reaching the crucial 270. Key states like Michigan and Wisconsin are also leaning towards Trump, with significant leads reported. In Michigan, Trump is ahead by 324,000 votes with 83% reporting, and in Wisconsin, he leads by 108,000 votes with 96% reporting. Other battleground states, including Arizona and Nevada, show Trump with favorable margins. Despite the outstanding calls, all indicators suggest a Trump victory is imminent.

The speaker claims that real-time Edison data reveals election data manipulation. According to the speaker, Seidl receives raw election data directly from election officials in at least nine states. The speaker alleges that an additive process should show more votes, not deletions, in each interval report. However, a video of Edison reports allegedly shows pauses, oscillation, and deletions in total, in-person, and mail-in votes. The speaker claims this is the algorithm trying to figure out the math problem. The speaker points to North Carolina and Georgia counties as examples, noting Seidl directly contracts with Georgia. The speaker then plays a clip of someone discussing estimated vote percentages dropping, suggesting the reported results are not actual results. The speaker questions the calling of races with razor-thin margins, particularly Arizona, based on projections and alleged impossible data anomalies. The speaker asserts that historically, those counting votes called races, but now machines and news outlets do, deterring challenges.

Kamala Harris is unlikely to win key battleground states like Georgia, North Carolina, and Arizona. If she doesn't secure these, she must win Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin to reach 270 electoral votes. Current insights suggest she could win Pennsylvania but still lose the presidency if she fails in Wisconsin, where sources indicate she faces significant challenges. The narrative that winning Pennsylvania guarantees the election is misleading; she could win there and still lose overall due to Wisconsin. Recent polling shows a tight race in Pennsylvania, with Harris within the margin of error. Attention should be focused on Wisconsin, as its outcome may be crucial for the election.

We are awaiting more votes from the key battleground states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. Both campaigns are closely monitoring the situation as six top battlegrounds remain undecided. Stay tuned for the next significant update on the vote count.

3% of pre-election voting ballots were altered using HAMR and ScoreCard software, potentially impacting the national vote. An algorithm was used to adjust votes for Biden in specific areas, like Michigan where a glitch favored Trump by 55100 votes in one district. Similar issues are suspected in other states with thousands of ballots appearing for Biden, statistically implausible.

The speaker discusses cybersecurity concerns in the election system, alleging that votes are stored on servers in Germany and could be manipulated by hackers. They point to suspicious vote count changes in swing states and highlight vulnerabilities in the software that could allow for vote manipulation. The speaker questions the transparency of the election process and calls for investigations into potential fraud. In Georgia, a hand recount of all ballots was announced following demands from the Trump campaign.

Dominion, a company with Democratic ties, is suspected of potentially allowing late votes to be added to favor Biden. Lawsuits in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan are being closely watched for potential constitutional violations and vote discrepancies. The administration may have a chance of prevailing in these states.

Over 1,500,000 fraudulent votes counted, and the spread is less than 82,000 votes. These fraudulent votes come from dead voters, ballots that were received before they were supposedly mailed out, and over 330,000 electronic spikes from the voting machine. 205,000 over votes, meaning there were 205,000 more votes than registered voters, and 682,000 ballots that were illegally processed without any oversight whatsoever. More than 1,500,000 votes in Pennsylvania is apparently what it took for Joe Biden to steal the state. Georgia has a similar phenomenon that Democrats are failing to account for. 66,248 underage voters voted in Georgia. 10,315 dead people voted. 2,500 convicted felons voted. Nearly 200,000 votes were fraudulently inserted into the vote instantaneously. 4,500 votes come from unregistered voters. These numbers show a clear pattern that a variety of types of fraud occurred in this election and that Democrats are desperately trying to cover it up. They're going to great lengths to change the narrative of the election fraud in an effort to run up the clock to 01/20/2020. In addition to president Trump's team, many independent groups have completed research on the fraud and the results are staggering. Totaling across the country, millions of votes were fraudulently covered up, changed, or deleted in favor of Joe Biden. The governors and secretaries of state have actively participated in the cover up. Removing information from their website that is normally easily accessible to the public and depriving conservatives a chance to audit or review the results are just some of their tactics. In Arizona, the final result is only a difference of 10,457, yet 36,400 non citizens voted in the state. Arizona also experienced phantom spikes from the voting machines to the tune of roughly 50,000 additional votes going to Joe Biden. These numbers come from information that is publicly available, whether from the secretary of state's website before the content was removed or from the raw data that was pushed out on election night.

We received close to 75 million votes, possibly even more. However, we lost the election by a small margin. Let's take Pennsylvania as an example. The results were in our favor at 10 o'clock, but then there was a sudden significant drop. It's truly unfortunate and disheartening.

Over 1,500,000 fraudulent votes were counted in Pennsylvania, where the spread is less than 82,000 votes. These votes include dead voters, ballots received before mailing, and 330,000 electronic spikes from voting machines. There were 205,000 overvotes and 682,000 ballots illegally processed without oversight. In Georgia, 66,248 underage voters, 10,315 dead people, and 2,500 convicted felons voted. Nearly 200,000 votes were fraudulently inserted instantaneously, and 4,500 votes came from unregistered voters. Democrats are allegedly trying to cover up this fraud. Millions of votes were fraudulently covered up, changed, or deleted nationwide in favor of Joe Biden. Governors and secretaries of state have allegedly participated in the cover-up, removing information from websites. In Arizona, 36,400 noncitizens voted, while the final result is a difference of 10,457 votes. Arizona also experienced phantom spikes from voting machines, adding roughly 50,000 votes for Joe Biden.

In the early hours of November 4, 2020, Joe Biden received major vote spikes in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, putting him in the lead. These spikes occurred during a 5-hour window when counting reportedly had stopped. The updates in question did not follow typical patterns and were particularly extreme. For example, in Michigan, Biden received 141,258 votes compared to Trump's 5,968 votes in a single update. A similar situation occurred in Wisconsin, where Biden went from trailing by over 100,000 votes to taking the lead with a single update. In Georgia, Biden received 136,155 votes while Trump only received 29,115 votes in another update. These spikes were larger than the margin of victory in all three states. Critics argue that these spikes were human errors, but there is no evidence to support this claim.

Silk presents evidence of alleged election fraud in the 2020 US election. Statistical anomalies in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia are highlighted, with sudden spikes in votes for Biden during the early hours of November 4th. These spikes are deemed abnormal and extreme, potentially impacting the election outcome. Eyewitness and video evidence from Georgia is shown, suggesting the mishandling of absentee ballots. Cybersecurity experts claim that Dominion Voting Machines were vulnerable to manipulation through unencrypted VPN connections. Forensic audits of the machines in Michigan reveal high error rates and potential fraud. The transcript concludes by urging viewers to download and share the video as evidence of election irregularities.

Data analysts found unexplained ballot drop-off in key swing states after the 2024 election. In Arizona, there was an 80,000 vote drop-off in the presidential race; Trump won by 40,000. Georgia saw a 110,000 vote drop-off; Trump's margin was under 30,000. Wisconsin had 60,000 fewer presidential votes; Trump won by roughly 25,000. Nevada's drop-off was around 45,000 votes; Trump's margin was only 15,000. Pennsylvania had over 90,000 fewer votes for president; Trump won by 50,000. Kamala Harris was on the losing end of the drop off in every state. Over 40% of US counties used ES&S voting machines in 2024. ProVNV, a federally certified testing lab, approved last-minute software changes to these machines, labeled "de minimis," affecting ballot scanners, audit logs, and reporting software. A Rockland County, New York lawsuit demands discovery of machine logs, poll tapes, and ballots. ES&S is a private company that builds and sells voting machines. ProVNV is a private lab that approves changes to voting equipment.

This is a crucial moment for the Harris campaign to reach 270 electoral votes. They are focusing on the blue wall states: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan, where they have the best chances. Currently, two of these states are leaning red. The campaign remains hopeful but is also considering possibilities in the Sun Belt. In North Carolina, Trump leads by 142,000 votes with 85% reporting. While there are still outstanding votes in urban areas that could favor Democrats, the situation resembles 2016 more than 2020. The Harris campaign is analyzing the remaining votes to strategize, but the outlook in North Carolina appears more favorable for Trump at this stage.

The majority of election jurisdictions in the US use outdated software that is vulnerable to hacking. States like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Florida, Iowa, Indiana, Arizona, North Carolina, and even Georgia (despite recent legislation) are at risk. If a small percentage determines the election outcome and people perceive it as unfair, it could seriously damage our democratic system. Experts argue that without a thorough forensic analysis, it is impossible to confirm that no votes were altered in the 2016 election. Additionally, 43% of American voters use machines with security flaws, and some companies refuse to disclose their cybersecurity practices. Five states lack a paper trail, making it impossible to verify the accuracy of voting machine results.

President Trump and his legal team are investigating irregularities in the 2020 election. They have two main avenues to secure his second term: state legislatures and the Supreme Court. State legislatures have the authority to select the correct electors for their states, and hearings have been held to address concerns about the selection of electors. President Trump needs three states to invalidate Democrat electors or select Republican electors. The Supreme Court is another option, with cases from Pennsylvania, Arizona, Wisconsin, and possibly Georgia potentially combining. Congress could also play a role if electors are uncertain or contested. Many citizens are questioning why local leaders are preventing access to voting machines, and they are encouraged to contact their state and local leaders for transparency.

In Antrim County, a software glitch caused a 6,000 vote swing from Republicans to Democrats. The county clerk admitted to the error, leading to a manual recount of all ballots. It was discovered that 47 other counties in Michigan use the same software and should review their results for discrepancies. Transparency and openness are essential for the people of Michigan.

The speaker claims that the current election is the most consistently tight general election ever, particularly in seven key battleground states: Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. The margins in these states average only 1 or 2 points, based on polling data. The speaker states that the average error for statewide polling in battleground states since 1972 is 3.4 points. Therefore, an average error across these states could cause all of them to swing in one direction.

Several states, including Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Georgia, requested their election materials back from Mike Pence. These requests were made by various individuals and committees within the states. Contrary to reports, it was not Donald Trump pressuring Pence to not open the envelopes. Pence actually returned the materials to the states. This decision seems foolish because once the envelopes were opened, there would have been a challenge.

The speakers discuss election night, noting no surprises and very close races in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. Public polling indicated a close race, and early results confirm this. The Harris campaign aimed to increase voter turnout to counteract Trump's expected rural votes. Some believe the Harris campaign was flawless, with strong get-out-the-vote efforts, while Trump's rallies were not well-attended. Reproductive rights are a key issue for young women voters. Trump's vote share increased in rural counties compared to 2020. North Carolina and Georgia were called for Trump. Trump also gained ground in key Pennsylvania counties. The Republican Party will control the Senate. The Harris campaign acknowledged the need to count all votes. The mood at the Harris event grew somber as results came in. The focus shifted to the "blue wall" states, which remained uncalled. Pennsylvania was later called for Trump, presenting an insurmountable challenge for Harris. Trump declared victory, stating they overcame obstacles thought impossible.

Votes in Michigan were miscounted due to software errors, favoring Democrats over Republicans. This affected 47 counties using the same software. Antrim County had to manually count all ballots. Other counties should review their results for discrepancies. Michigan residents deserve transparency in the election process.

The speaker discusses how the vote total may have been altered through the HAMMER program and ScoreCard software, affecting the election outcome. They mention a computer glitch in Michigan that favored President Trump, suggesting similar issues in other states. They question the sudden appearance of thousands of ballots for Biden, deeming it statistically improbable.

Democrats mistakenly received votes meant for Republicans in Michigan due to a software glitch, causing a 6,000 vote swing. The county clerk admitted to the error, prompting a hand count of all ballots in one county. It was discovered that 47 counties used the same software, raising concerns about similar discrepancies. Transparency and scrutiny are needed in Michigan's election process. Translation: Due to a software error, votes were incorrectly assigned to Democrats instead of Republicans in Michigan, leading to a significant swing in votes. This mistake has raised concerns about the accuracy of the election results in 47 counties that used the same software. Transparency and careful review of the results are necessary for the people of Michigan.

Speaker 0 presents a video focused on data and evidence of alleged irregularities in the 2020 election, asserting that there has been no comprehensive place to see widespread fraud until now. He states the video is “pure data” and invites viewers to consider the statistical anomalies in three states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia) in the early hours of 11/04/2020, when Biden received major vote spikes after trailing Trump. - He analyzes 8,954 individual vote updates and identifies a clear statistical pattern across nearly all updates, with four notably aberrant updates: two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia, all occurring in the same five-hour window in the middle of the night when counting reportedly stopped in some places. - In Michigan, a 06:30AM update shows Biden at 141,258 votes to Trump’s 5,968, described as the most extreme update in all datasets across all states, followed by a noticeable ratio change in nearby updates. In Wisconsin, a single update allegedly moved Biden from trailing by over 100,000 votes into the lead. In Georgia, a 01:34AM Eastern Time update shows Biden at 136,155 to Trump’s 29,115. They claim these four spikes exceed the states’ margins of victory, making the spikes not only abnormal by percentage but also by magnitude. They conclude that if these four unlikely updates had not happened, the presidency could have been different. - Detractors are cited as arguing human error, but the video questions where evidence of corrections is, and notes that California shows only one anomalous update in percentage, not enough magnitude to shift outcomes. - A “consistently identical ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time” is highlighted as allegedly impossible, with a Florida example showing 100 identical ratios over several days. The video asserts a computer algorithm is involved, termed a weighted race distribution, associated with Diebold voting machines (known as early as 2001), implying values rather than simple counts. - In California, a single update is shown with Biden receiving about 65% and Trump 32% for one vote, raising questions about how one vote could go to more than one candidate. Speaker 0 then links these patterns to alleged connections between Diebold and Dominion Voting Systems, claiming Dominion acquired ESNS in 2010, which had previously acquired Diebold, and that Dominion’s software is licensed from Smartmatic. They also note that forensic audits show errors and that the mainstream narrative claims these issues are misinformation. They reference NBC News and PBS findings on how easy it is to hack voting machines or cast fake votes. Next, Speaker 0 notes eyewitness and video evidence from Georgia: poll worker Ruby allegedly was filmed in the backroom with absentee ballots, and at 10:30PM on November 3, media and poll watchers were told to leave, yet Ruby and others remained, pulling ballots from under a table and distributing them to counting stations. They describe Ruby running the same stack of ballots to the machine three times, observing a large Biden surge after 01:34AM Georgia time, and question whether a ballot can be counted more than once, citing Coffey County, Georgia as an example of someone claiming to scan the same batches repeatedly. Speaker 0 references Raquel Rodriguez, arrested for election fraud in Texas over video evidence of ballot harvesting, and asserts that cybersecurity evidence indicates Dominion and Edison Research used an unencrypted VPN with easily accessible credentials allowing foreign access, asserting that China, Iran, and other countries accessed the servers, contradicting claims that Dominion machines were not connected to the Internet. They mention Dominion’s association with a Chinese-registered domain, and board members with Chinese nationality, alleging conflicts of interest through corporate ownership and licensing from Smartmatic. Speaker 0 highlights that Antrim County, Michigan audits found high error and adjudication rates in Dominion, with an 68 o 5% error rate far above federal guidelines, missing logs for 2020, and reprogramming of election event designer cards during the safe harbor period. They point to subpoenas and the lack of access to logs, and to affidavits from poll workers claiming illegal activities, non-equal treatment of observers, counting without proper oversight, shredding ballots, and other irregularities. Speaker 7 concludes with a claim that many Americans distrust the 2020 election and urges viewers to download and share the video, demand election reform, and notes that the video’s credits will continue with data readers, while warning of erasure or fact checks by tech platforms.