reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Stein says, Bibi, Rabin's blood is on your hands. An assassin has taken yet another world leader away from us. It was just after the biggest peace rally in Tel Aviv. NARRATOR: Rabin's widow blamed Netanyahu for contributing to her husband's death. The fascination of Yitzhak Rabin has also produced shock in the Palestinian community. And said so on worldwide television. Your husband pointed the finger at mister Netanyahu and said, you must stop this incitement. To what extent do you blame mister Netanyahu and the Likud for what has happened? I do I do blame them. The rally in Kikazion in Jerusalem that showed him in the uniform of a Nazi. So mister Bibi Netanyahu, now he can say from here to eternity that he didn't support it and didn't agree with it, but he was there, and it didn't stop it. Netanyahu's

They call themselves Netanyahu, but it's just a stolen name, a Hebrew mask plastered over a European exile's face. His real name was Milakowski, born of Ashkenazi lineage from Poland. Benjamin Netanyahu has neither the blood nor the land nor the language of those he claims to represent. It is the Judaism of a colonizer from elsewhere who put on the prophet's robe to hide the scent of ashes. What he represents today is not a people, it is a machine, a political, military, ideological machine, a machine of steel and contempt. He never spoke Arabic. He never shared bread with a Palestinian. He never had to bury a child beneath the rubble of an Israeli airstrike. Today, under his rule, Gaza is a graveyard for children.

The documentary traces Benjamin Netanyahu’s career through a web of security crises, personal power, and ongoing legal jeopardy, arguing that his decisions have been driven by a perceived need to survive corruption investigations while mobilizing fear and factional support to stay in power. It begins with a stark claim: nothing concentrates Netanyahu’s mind like the sound of the prison gate, and that his actions over the last five years were focused on that possibility, with the corruption trial becoming a dominant factor in decision making. The engine, according to interviewees, is the corruption cases, and Netanyahu’s attitude toward the law, with “Anyone that dare to touch mister Netanyahu is doomed.” After October 7, the war became another instrument to stay in power. Several speakers observe that Netanyahu survived in a state of war, in instability, and during divisions among Israelis, noting that a “forever war” benefits him by making people feel constantly endangered and in need of his leadership. A political analyst adds that the trial “took all of us hostage,” while others describe how Netanyahu’s inner circle—referred to as a “sugar daddy” network—provided resources not supported by the state, ensuring political operations despite legal trouble. The relationship between Netanyahu and powerful business figures emerges as central. Arnold Milchan, an Israeli-born Hollywood producer who amassed wealth and influence, is described as a crucial conduit to the prime minister, with Netanyahu and his wife Sarah allegedly receiving gifts valued at a quarter of a million dollars. Milchan’s favors to Netanyahu and the suspicion that Milchan was bribing the prime minister are part of the ongoing breach of trust indictment, which centers on Netanyahu’s access to Milchan and possible protection or preferential treatment in return. The documentary also covers Shaul Alovich (Shai Alovich) and Yair and Sara Netanyahu’s media and political influence, including a controversial arrangement in which Netanyahu secured control of the Walla news site in return for signatures enabling Alovich to access cash. The witnesses describe the Netanyahu circle pressuring finance and tax laws to benefit Milchan and other allies, sometimes invoking American pressure and visa issues in the background. Key personal dynamics are highlighted. Sarah Netanyahu is portrayed as a powerful decision-maker who selects advisers, schedules, and policy, with accounts of her alleged mistreatment of workers and involvement in a sex scandal known as the “hot tape” scandal. The documentary suggests that Netanyahu’s fear and need to appear in control intensified after 2015, a turning point when his political team believed he could prevail regardless of public accountability, leading to a deterioration in judgment and trust. The narrative then shifts to Netanyahu’s long-established stance on terrorism and security, portraying him as an expert on terrorism and defender of Israel, whose televised performances built his popularity. This posture is juxtaposed with his handling of Hamas: the state’s support for Hamas, the flow of money to Hamas via Qatar at Netanyahu’s instruction, and the belief that Israel could control the level of hatred by direct support or management of Palestinian authorities are all presented as part of a strategy that backfired, culminating in October 7. The documentary asserts that his Gaza policy—keeping Hamas in Gaza to weaken the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank—failed catastrophically, and that support for hardline right-wing figures like Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich within his coalition has pushed Israel toward a more expansive, militarized approach, including settlement expansion and punitive actions in the West Bank. Public reaction is depicted as deeply divided. Weeks of demonstrations against judicial reform showed a country split, with protesters fearing that reform would castrate the judiciary and undermine democracy, while Netanyahu and his supporters argued reforms were essential, insisting that the investigations themselves forced drastic measures. The civilian toll of the war—over 15,000 deaths in Gaza at the time of filming, and ongoing hostages—adds urgency to calls for action, with hostage families pressing the government for results and accusing Netanyahu of prioritizing political survival over ending hostilities and securing captives’ release. In conclusion, the documentary presents Netanyahu as a leader who has navigated crises by leveraging fear, strengthening coalition ties with far-right figures, and pursuing judicial changes that he argues are necessary for national security, while his opponents insist the reforms are designed to shield him from legal jeopardy. The film ends by reiterating that the war and the political crisis are intertwined, with the region’s chaos shaping Netanyahu’s tactical choices and the public’s willingness to endure them.

I was shocked and sickened by the reaction of the ghoulish and really repulsive reaction of the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, to Charlie's death. He basically made it all about him and redirected the grief toward support for his project. "Benjamin Netanyahu is not the same as the nation of Israel at all." "BB's defenders, on the Internet will call me a liar or a kook, but that's a fact." "what he said was completely untrue." "Charlie didn't hate Jews. He loved Jews. He loved the state of Israel. He loved going there." "He did not like Bibi Netanyahu, and he said that to me many times." "He felt that Bibi Netanyahu was a very destructive force." "He was resentful that he believed Netanyahu was using The United States to prosecute his wars for the benefit of his country." "Shortly after that speech, there was a very intense attack on Charlie; he had $100,000,000 worth of donors." "Two days before he died, he lost a $2,000,000 donation because he had publicly pledged to bring me to the next Turning Point Conference in December." "They put out a flyer basically saying that I was going to be at this event giving a speech."

The documentary traces how Benjamin Netanyahu’s five-year leadership has been shaped by an intertwined mix of legal peril, personal power, and hard-line security strategies. It opens with the contention that the threat of prison has relentlessly focused Netanyahu’s decisions, with the corruption trials and the October 7 war serving as two central pressures that have driven his governance. One analyst asserts that the engine of his politics is the corruption cases, and that a perception of immunity from the law has underpinned his endurance in office even as investigations proliferated. Multiple speakers describe Netanyahu as someone who “does not respect the law” and who treats any challenge to him as a threat to his rule. They argue that the October 7 attack and its aftermath were leveraged as instruments to stay in power, with the country kept in a “forever war” that creates a constant sense of danger and dependency on his leadership. A political analyst from Channel 13 contends that Netanyahu “took all of us hostage in this trial.” The narrative introduces a network of personal and political patrons surrounding Netanyahu. Arnold Milchan, an American-based Hollywood producer with ties to the prime minister, allegedly facilitated gifts and favors in exchange for political access, raising charges about “breach of trust.” Shaul Alovich, a powerful Israeli tycoon, is described as a figure who could secure or extract critical favors from Netanyahu, including gaining control over the news site Walla in exchange for a signature that Alovich needed for financing. The far-reaching influence of such relationships is framed as evidence of a broader pattern in which “government officials are not allowed to take gifts” and where Netanyahu’s circle repeatedly sought to bend or bypass formal limits. The role of Sarah Netanyahu is highlighted as a decisive force in the Prime Minister’s circle. She is portrayed as a major decision-maker who selects advisers and policy directions, sometimes described as running the country alongside Netanyahu. The documentary also revisits a 30-year-old sex scandal involving Netanyahu and how it allegedly shaped his relationship with Sarah and his political strategy. The program introduces a long-running tension between Netanyahu and the Israeli judiciary, culminating in a 2023 push for judicial reform. It is argued that the reform aimed to “break the bones of the system” by altering how judges are chosen, the structure of the police, and the powers of the attorney general, thereby allowing Netanyahu greater leeway to handle his legal predicament. Supporters and critics are shown debating whether the reform is primarily about shielding Netanyahu from prosecution or about broader democratic changes. Public demonstrations against the reform are described as the largest in Israel’s history, with tens of thousands of protesters expressing strong opposition. The documentary also delves into Netanyahu’s relationships with fringe right-wing partners Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, describing the coalition as “the country’s most far-right ever government.” It portrays Smotrich and Ben-Gvir as driving forces for expansionist policies in the West Bank and for a hard-line approach to security and policing, including provocative rhetoric about annexation and ethnicity. The influence of the right on security policy is linked to actions in the West Bank and to a broader strategy that includes controversial measures against Arab citizens within Israel. On the Gaza front, the program presents a devastating toll: thousands of Palestinians killed in Gaza, with escalating casualty figures cited (ranging from 15,000 to 25,000 in various passages). Hostage families express desperation for the return of their loved ones, arguing that hostages must come home before any broader war aims. In this view, the war’s continuation and the handling of hostages are central tests of Netanyahu’s leadership, and critics argue that the pursuit of “total victory” against Hamas has produced a costly and unsustainable cycle, while some participants question whether military pressure alone can secure a durable peace or hostage releases. The documentary closes by noting the perceived disconnect between Netanyahu’s claims of expertise on terrorism and the real-world outcomes of his policies, suggesting that while he speaks to international audiences about leadership and security, the domestic and regional consequences of his strategies have produced deep-seated resentment, ongoing conflict, and a politicized judiciary that remains a flashpoint in Israeli politics.

Netanyahu's extreme government has faced challenges in holding office, with five elections in four years due to the inability to form a stable majority. Last year, he formed a coalition with the far-right, resulting in the most right-wing government in Israeli history. Notable figures in his cabinet include Itamar Ben Gavir, convicted on multiple charges including supporting a terrorist organization, and Bezalel Smotrich, who denies the existence of Palestinian history and culture. Smotrich advocates for seizing land in the West Bank and driving Palestinians from their homes, despite settlements being deemed illegal. Netanyahu has given him a prominent role in settlement affairs.

The intensity grew, culminating in a massive protest. Tens of thousands crammed into the center of Jerusalem. In Netanyahu's conservative Likud party, there was concern about the growing tension in the crowds that night. There were moments when Netanyahu was advised that, you know, there are real nut cases in the national religious camp, that we see that we need to calm down, eve, even gesturally. The crowd was with him as he attacked Arafat. And then, as Rabin was leaving that's him coming down the ramp the man in the blue T shirt approached. Three shots from behind. The Israeli prime minister Yitzh ak Rabin, the architect of the Middle East peace process, has been assassinated. The assassin? A right wing Israeli Jew, Yigal Amir.

Netanyahu is allegedly mapping out today's massacre in a leaked video from 2001.

The Netanyahu regime is described as one of the most dangerous in contemporary human history. The Israeli regime in general is characterized as ethnosupremacist, viewing others as inferior. Netanyahu is seen as particularly brutal, murderous, and without red lines, similar to his right-wing allies. It is claimed that they would target nuclear programs regardless of potential radiation leaks and target civilian buildings to murder everyone and create terror. They allegedly bombed ordinary buildings, killing entire families unconnected to any administration. The Netanyahu regime is thus portrayed as a threat to the region and humanity.

And Netanyahu is a madman, and I repeat that to me. He's a madman. I met him years ago. I interviewed him when he was out of office, and, I thought he was a madman then. And I I think he's gotten worse and worse and worse. He's truly insane. I've never seen such a slaughter. And Netanyahu is a madman, and I repeat that to me. He's a madman. I met him years ago. I interviewed him when he was out of office, and, I thought he was a madman then. And I I think he's gotten worse and worse and worse. He's truly insane. I've never seen such a slaughter.

Speaker argues the Israeli hard right government has a mandate to ethnically cleanse Gaza, saying, 'to they're gonna try to ethnically cleanse Gaza.' They claim they aim to remove '2,500,000 people from there.' He adds, 'there is they this idea that they need to have a true truce or a peace treaty, that's morally crap after you see women and children be burned alive and dragged to the streets.' He says, 'The whole country is a fortress' and you 'cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with an a r 15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier.' He states, 'The last nine months, Israel is on the brink of civil war' and notes protests against Netanyahu, who 'now has an emergency government and a mandate to lead.' He asks, 'Was there a stand down order?'

Stein says, Bibi, Rabin's blood is on your hands. An assassin has taken yet another world leader away from us. It was just after the biggest peace rally in Tel Aviv. NARRATOR: Rabin's widow blamed Netanyahu for contributing to her husband's death. The fascination of Yitzhak Rabin has also produced shock in the Palestinian community. And said so on worldwide television. Your husband pointed the finger at mister Netanyahu and said, you must stop this incitement. To what extent do you blame mister Netanyahu and the Likud for what has happened? I do I do blame them. The rally in Kikazion in Jerusalem that showed him in the uniform of a Nazi. So mister Bibi Netanyahu, now he can say from here to eternity that he didn't support it and didn't agree with it, but he was there, and it didn't stop.

Thousands filled central Jerusalem as protests intensified. In Netanyahu's Likud, there was concern about growing tension in the crowds that night. "There were moments when Netanyahu was advised that, you know, there are real nut cases in the national religious camp, that we see that we need to calm down, eve, even gesturally." The crowd was with him as he attacked Arafat. And then, as Rabin was leaving that's him coming down the ramp the man in the blue T shirt approached. Three shots from behind. The Israeli prime minister, Yitzh ak Rabin, the architect of the Middle East peace process, has been assassinated. The assassin? A right wing Israeli Jew, Yigal Amir.

The intensity grew, culminating in a massive protest. Tens of thousands crammed into the center of Jerusalem. In Netanyahu's conservative Likud party, there was concern about the growing tension in the crowds that night. There were moments when Netanyahu was advised that, you know, there are real nut cases in the national religious camp, that we see that we need to calm down, eve, even gesturally. The crowd was with him as he attacked Arafat. And then the government of Yitzhak Rabin. Then, as Rabin was leaving that's him coming down the ramp the man in the blue T shirt approached. Three shots from behind. The Israeli prime minister Yitzh ak Rabin, the architect of the Middle East peace process, has been assassinated. The assassin? A right wing Israeli Jew, Yigal Amir.

Benjamin Netanyahu is not the same as the nation of Israel at all. "Bibi is despised by many people, in Israel." There are "huge divisions within the Israeli government," and "parts of the intel world in Israel that do not support some things Benjamin Netanyahu has done recently." "his attempt to hijack Charlie's memory and use it for his own political ends, particularly because what he said was completely untrue." "Charlie didn't hate Jews. He loved Jews. He loved the state of Israel, loved going there." He "did not like Bibi Netanyahu, and he said that to me many times, and to people around him many times." "He felt that Bibi Netanyahu was a very destructive force." He was "appalled by what was happening in Gaza," and he "resented Netanyahu using The United States to prosecute his wars for the benefit of his country, and that it was shameful and embarrassing and bad for The United States."

The Netanyahu government is considered extremist, with dangerous policies that pose a threat to democracy and the people of Israel.

I think Bibi is completely evil and completely destructive, "hurting The United States" and "destroying his own country" and I think he imperils the world. They believe they're gonna try and blow up Al Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount to "build a third temple," risking "global war." They ask, "What's Lindsey Graham's excuse?" and "What's Ted Cruz's excuse?" They quote Cruz: "I was elected. My main goal was to help Israel." I came into congress with the stated intention of being the leading defender of Israel in the United States Senate. "I've worked every day to do that." "Really? Ted, how did you get on a platform ... my main goal is to help another country? This is deranged. Where's our self respect? I don't want you to think about it. You know, I'm not interested. I'm very interested in how American leaders could betray their own country. That enrages me."

A Facebook post by a minister of justice in Israel sparked controversy for calling Palestinians enemy combatants and advocating for harm to their mothers. Another prominent figure, the current minister of national security, has a history of supporting violence against Arabs. Despite portraying themselves as victims, Israel has been accused of creating a victim complex to justify their actions against Gaza.

I was shocked and sickened by the reaction of the ghoulish and really repulsive reaction of the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, to Charlie's death. Basically made it all about him and all about his country immediately trying to take the energy, the sadness, the grief that people felt over Charlie's murder and redirect it towards support for whatever project he's involved in. Benjamin Netanyahu is not the same as the nation of Israel at all. Bibi is despised by many people in Israel. There are huge divisions within the Israeli government. I mean, are certain parts of the intel world in Israel that do not support some things that Benjamin Netanyahu has done recently. Charlie didn't hate Jews. He loved Jews. He had tons of friends who were Jews. He loved the state of Israel. Loved going there. He did not like B. B. Netanyahu, and he said that to me many times, and he said to people around him many times. He felt that Bibi Netanyahu was a very destructive force. He was appalled by what was happening in Gaza. He was above all resentful that he believed Netanyahu was using The United States to prosecute his wars for the benefit of his country, and that it was shameful and embarrassing and bad for The United States, and he resented it. There's no question that BB's defenders on the internet will call me a liar or a kook, but that's a fact. Enough text messages exist that I think it can probably be verified in pretty short order.

A Facebook post by a minister of justice in Israel sparked controversy for calling Palestinians enemy combatants and advocating for their mothers' deaths. Another prominent figure, the current minister of national security, has a history of supporting violence against Arabs. Despite portraying themselves as victims, Israel has been accused of creating a victim complex to justify their actions against Gaza.

Former Deputy Director of National Intelligence, Beth Sanner, suggests that President Biden should firmly establish what Israel cannot do in the West Bank to prevent the collapse of a two-state solution. In the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, columnist Oded Basharat accuses two members of Netanyahu's cabinet, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and Minister of National Security Itamar Ben Gavir, of exploiting the Hamas attacks to advance their anti-Arab agenda. Smotrich, a far-right politician, has been accused of planning terrorist attacks and purging the West Bank of its Palestinian population. Ben Gavir, an openly racist member of a far-right party, has celebrated the murder of Palestinians and has been criticized for his treatment of Hamas prisoners. The presence of these extremists in the Israeli government raises questions about Netanyahu's stance on their actions and policies.

Speaker says 'the Israeli hard right government has a mandate' and that 'they're gonna try to ethnically cleanse Gaza' by 'removing 2,500,000 people from there.' They claim 'they have a mandate to go seek justice and revenge' and that a peace treaty would be 'morally crap after you see women and children be burned alive and dragged to the streets.' The speaker notes, 'The whole country is a fortress,' and that 'I've been to that Gaza border' where 'you cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with AR-15 or automatic machine gun.' They claim 'the last nine months, Israel is on the brink of civil war' with protests against Netanyahu for redefining the constitution; now 'Netanyahu has emergency government and mandate to lead.' They ask, 'Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order? Six hour?'

those are the words of a man, with an international arrest warrant for war crimes and crimes against humanity. I'm speaking of Netanyahu. He is a mass murderer. He is a killer. He commits war crimes, and he has control over American foreign policy and over American domestic policy now. The US government is run by Israel, by the Israeli government. Why and how? It's little hard to say, but it is the unbelievable fact that this brazenness, this recklessness, this cruelty, this arrogance from this extremist Israeli government controls American policy vis a vis, speech in The United States now. It's, it's shocking but true.

Three shots from behind. The Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, the architect of the Middle East peace process has been assassinated. The assassin, a right wing Israeli Jew, Yigal Amir. Truly shocking news from The Middle East tonight. Israel's prime minister Yitzhak Rabin has been assassinated. Evening spent dreaming of peace turns into a national nightmare. Outside the hospital, the crowd began to chant. Phoebe is a murderer. The sign says, Bibi, Rabin's blood is on your hands. The assassin has taken yet another world leader away from us. It was just after the biggest peace rally in Tel Aviv. Rabin's widow blamed Netanyahu for contributing to her husband's death. Nation of Yitzhak Rabin has also produced shock in the Palestinian community. And said so on worldwide television. Speaker 1: Your husband pointed the finger at mister Netanyahu said, you must stop this incitement.