TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker explains that a series of laws allowed the military to take over vaccine distribution without any clinical trials or safety testing. The safety testing conducted by the pharmaceutical industry was just for show and had no regulatory implications. The FDA, which is responsible for regulating medical products, does not have the authority to regulate these countermeasures. The legal framework being used pretends that these are health products when they are actually in a different legal space.

If we're gonna make America healthy again, we can't allow public health to be undermined. So could you explain what steps you're gonna be taking to ensure vaccine guidance is clear, evidence based, and trustworthy? We're going to make it clear evidence based and trustworthy for the first time in history. Only one of those 19 vaccines, 92 doses, only one of those vaccines has ever been tested against an inert placebo. And what we're doing now is any new vaccine that before it's approved and licensed will have to show demonstrate safety against inert placebo. And we're going to go back and do observational studies on the existing vaccines to see if they're linked to any of these chronic disease epidemics so that people can understand the risk profile of those products and make good assessments for their own health.

Speaker 0 described a guest whose 18-year-old daughter was injected with Pfizer and developed cancer. He stated that he has sat across numerous people who lost their children to these injections, with some deaths immediate and others gruesome, and that these people must testify to lawmakers and others recounting their stories repeatedly. He framed this as a massive crime that needs to stop. He asserted that the FDA was fully aware that these injections would cause cancer, citing published guidance documents. He claimed that the FDA regulates the industry and, in 2015 and 2013 (and even more recently), wrote extensive guidance documents explaining to manufacturers developing mRNA products that they must study risks, including cancer, death, fertility issues, blindness, strokes, and cardiovascular issues. He said these risks were documented as regulatory knowledge and that manufacturers were told they had to study these risks and exclude them. He also claimed that studying these risks in healthy volunteers was not allowed because it was considered unethical. He contrasted this with 2020, stating that “all of a sudden, all of this is solved,” calling it a joke, and that this period raised his suspicions, prompting him to investigate independently. He concluded by describing the situation as a premeditated crime in which regulators knew, and that the military conducted a “fake exercise” to capture all these pharmaceutical companies and compel them to create these weapons.

A bombshell report reveals that the Department of Defense controlled the COVID-19 program from the beginning, using shady approval authorizations to shield big pharma from liability. The Pentagon used laws like the PrEP Act, Emergency Use Authorization, and Other Transaction Authority to protect pharmaceutical companies. Documents obtained by a former executive show that the vaccines were not compliant with good manufacturing practices, with extreme variability in adverse events. Clinical trials were deceptive, with subjects and investigators kept in the dark. The National Security Council treated COVID as an act of war, while telling the public it was a health event. The Pentagon's influence extends to multiple agencies, with a secret Pandemic Enterprise formed in 2013. The countermeasures used are prototypes, not fully tested vaccines.

Secretary Kennedy, the mRNA injections marketed as COVID vaccines are merely emergency use authorized medical countermeasures. This pathway bypasses standard pharmaceutical regulations and informed consent. Misrepresentations about these products' safety and efficacy are legally permissible, making official claims unreliable. These shots are now on the CDC childhood vaccination schedule for infants as young as nine months old. The current PREP Act declaration, extended until 2029, abuses federal law intended for short-term emergencies. This shields pharmaceutical companies from liability for deaths and injuries caused by these unsafe products. The FDA falsely claims full approval for those 12 and older, yet the injured are directed to a compensation program that denies almost all claims. I urge you to terminate the PREP Act emergency declaration and investigate the misuse of federal law in the pandemic response, which has led to a human tragedy and destroyed public trust.

The speaker explains that the COVID injections are not considered pharmaceutical products. They discuss the significance of a particular US code that states the use of emergency use authorized (EUA) countermeasure products is not considered a clinical investigation. This allows the government to remove these products from regulatory frameworks and operate in an extrajudicial space. The public health emergency announcement triggers this mechanism, and the government can make determinations without data or criteria. The speaker also mentions that the COVID pandemic was declared based on limited cases, and once a pandemic is announced, pharmaceutical regulations no longer apply. The products are classified as countermeasures, which is a vague term.

In October 2020, the speaker was asked if Operation Warp Speed would use the expanded access use pathway to get on the market. The speaker responded that they would not be using that pathway because it requires an institutional review board (IRB) and informed consent, which they wanted to avoid due to the added complexity. The speaker expressed concern for the lack of informed consent in vaccine injuries and deaths. They mentioned that this scheme was designed to deceive professionals and took years to uncover. Both sides, including FDA staff, CDC staff, pharma staff, management, and lawyers, were aware of what they were doing.

The Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) regulation from the Clinton administration included safeguards. You can distribute a medication without approval, clinical trials, or safety testing, but only if no existing approved drug is effective against the target illness. To use the EUA for vaccines, any effective drugs against COVID needed to be discredited. Early on, it was known that hydroxychloroquine was effective against coronavirus. NIH studies demonstrated its effectiveness both as a preventative and as a cure. Ivermectin was also very effective. Acknowledging that these drugs worked would have eliminated the use of the emergency use authorization. So, they had to suppress them.

Over the past few weeks, BARDA reviewed 22 mRNA vaccine development investments and began canceling them. Here's the problem: mRNA only codes for a small part of the viral proteins, usually a single antigen. One mutation and the vaccine becomes ineffective. That's because a single mutation can make mRNA vaccines ineffective. After reviewing the science and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses. To replace the troubled mRNA programs, we're prioritizing the development of the safer, broader vaccine strategies like whole virus vaccines and novel platforms that don't collapse when viruses mutate. Let me be absolutely clear: HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them.

Vaccine recommendations typically come from the Advisory Committee of Immunization Practices (an outside consulting committee at CDC) and VRBPAC (within FDA), which recommends vaccine licensure. These committees only adopted evidence-based medicine about twelve years ago. The speaker states that during their administration, they want safety studies prior to vaccine licensure and recommendation. They claim vaccines are exempt from pre-licensing safety testing, and the COVID vaccine was the only one tested in a full placebo trial. They assert that the other 76 shots children receive between birth and 18 have not been safety tested against a placebo, meaning the risk profile is not understood. The speaker intends to remedy this.

After issuing full approval for the vaccines, they also authorized emergency use of remdesivir monoclonals. They claim that both the fully approved and emergency authorized vaccines should be distributed, which is unprecedented. It's like being a US citizen and a green card holder simultaneously, which is not possible. This whole situation is a charade.

A bombshell report reveals that the Department of Defense controlled the COVID-19 program from the beginning, using shady approval authorizations to shield big pharma from liability. The Pentagon used laws like the PrEP Act, Emergency Use Authorization, and Other Transaction Authority to protect pharmaceutical companies and avoid proper clinical trials. Clinical trial subjects and investigators were deceived, and informed consent was not required. The National Security Council treated COVID-19 as an act of war, while telling the public it was a health event. The Pentagon's influence extended to agencies like the FDA and NIH. A secret Cabal called the Pandemic Enterprise was formed in 2013 to discuss countermeasures with strict confidentiality. The so-called vaccines were actually prototypes ordered by the Department of Defense, and people were not informed of this. Safety testing and animal trials were skipped, violating regulations.

It turns out that the manufacturers did not do due diligence to ensure these were safe products before they were released onto the American market. And throughout 2021 to 2024, the drug companies essentially ran the pandemic response. Judicial Watch, America's first legal, were able to obtain some documents. They didn't want to release it. Pfizer, they wanted a seventy year moratorium on the clinical data from the trials, which from the start showed these never prevented infection, never prevented disease transmission. And there's no good clinical data to ever show it reduced the severity of disease. The CDC in response, I don't know what's wrong with that once fine agency, but they've become a supplicant of big pharma. No. The paper's been torn to shreds by epidemiologists. It was based against a computer model and against an idea where you have the peak and it comes down and then it goes back up again.

At the outset, a process was approved by the FDA for emergency use authorization. However, it was later discovered that the approved process was swapped out for one containing contaminants like DNA and a cancer-causing substance. Pfizer redacted 800 pages of the manufacturing process, hiding the fact that a carcinogen was included. This lack of transparency led to no informed consent and potential harm to individuals. The vaccine rollout included a trial with a 2.4 times higher adverse event rate, including the presence of a carcinogen.

Speaker 0: I find information like this, you know, inserts for the vaccine. Paper's there, and there's nothing printed on it. I find that very interesting, disheartening, disgusting, and lots of other words, but then it gets better. It just keep wait. There's more. It just keeps happening. The CDC redacts every single word of a 148 page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. So I asked research to print the study for me. 148 pages. The entire thing is redacted. What good does a study do if there's nothing there? Then I wanna know, wait, what might have been there that they needed to redact it? That's even scarier. Speaker 1: We're witnessing an active cover up of a colossal consumer product safety debacle that is is basically affecting the entire world. Mhmm. So in The United States, our CDC, National Institutes of Health, and the FDA are actively involved in a cover up. And the same is occurring in The UK with the MHRA, Europe with European medicine agencies, and Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Something is going on that's very big. Each one of these companies that puts out a product has an obligation to produce ninety days of safety monitoring after their product comes out. It's a regulatory dossier. If somebody has a problem with the new product and they call the company like Pfizer, Pfizer has to report, write down what happened, and they have to collate that in a report and produce it and make it publicly available. When it came to ninety days with Pfizer, the first vaccine that came out, remember Pfizer was approved 12/10/2020. Pfizer didn't produce the report. And then people started asking, well, what's happening with your vaccine? And Pfizer would not disclose what happened. And then it went to court. And the lawyer for the FDA stepped in and said they don't wanna release Pfizer's dossier for fifty five years. Mhmm. Oh. Fifty five years. And the the the plaintiff pushed. And finally, slowly, the Pfizer dossier came out. Pfizer recorded one thousand two hundred and twenty three deaths with their product within ninety days of release. People were calling Pfizer in desperation watching their family members die after taking the vaccine. Pfizer recorded over twelve hundred new adverse events, new problems that doctor Boden has talked to you about that we are grappling with the entire time. But the point is our FDA worked to cover this up. The FDA should be regulating this company. FDA should have been having at least monthly meetings and fully disclosing what was going on with these novel vaccines, which are a genetic transfer technology platform.

There have been repeated attempts to mandate coercion without accepting natural immunity, which is claimed to be equally effective at preventing infection and more effective at preventing severe disease and death. There was no real questioning of an emergency use authorized product, and informed consent was not prioritized. When doctors make mistakes, they should acknowledge the mistake and harm, apologize, and institute measures to prevent recurrence. This hasn't happened at a public health scale, and the medical establishment needs to acknowledge the problem. The speaker believes the product in question should never have been approved for a single human. At the very least, there should be acknowledgement of unintended harms, apologies, efforts to help the vaccine-injured, and structures for greater transparency in medicine. Regulators should not receive 86% of their funding from big pharma and then claim to be independent.

Speaker 0: This is kind of dark, and I'm sorry. I gotta go there. It's kind of impossible that they didn't know all this shit. We didn't need the foyer requested pharmacokinetic data from Japan, although thank God for Byron Bridal for getting which that to shows clearly in Wistar rats that the lipid nanoparticles in this Pfizer context traffic everywhere in the body and bioaccumulate, including into the ovaries and the adrenals, etcetera. There was a paper published in 2012 that demonstrated exactly this in Wistar Rats, same model, same lipid nanoparticles, they use different kinds of nanoparticles, but it showed the same thing very clearly that one of the main places that these lipid nanoparticles traffic to were the ovaries. And the reason why we use Wistar rat models and mice models before we go to humans is because we're very similar biologically. That's the whole reason. So if something happens in a mouse or a rat, you gotta be careful because it might happen in a human too. Wink, wink. So another thing I wanna throw in here is that we there's this drug pardon me. There's this drug called ONPATTRO, which is utilizing the exact same kinds of lipid nanoparticles, which act as like in the same way that chylomicrons do. It's like these things that we inherently have for fat metabolism that have, proteins absorbed, which is on the surface of the lipid nanoparticle, that traffic these guys, these lipid nanoparticles with their silencing RNA, cargo to the liver via APOE because there are these APOE receptors in the liver in high quantity or they're expressed at high levels. And so these genius biotech guys have discovered and I'm not being sarcastic. They are geniuses for doing this. This shit shouldn't be being used in humans. This stuff traffics directly to the liver. This is all known. They've been studying lipid nanoparticles and trying to make them not toxic for freaking two decades, people. But the thing is that's very suspicious to me and I have no answers to these questions so far is how is it possible that in 2020 or whenever it was they did this, Moderna and Pfizer simultaneously solved the toxicity problem of lipid nanoparticles by coming up with this ionizable cationic lipid? What the hell is that? Speaker 1: It was Operation Warp Speed, because you wave a magic wand from the executive office of the President of The United States and everything, all the checks and balances downstream go away. He's very proud of the fact Speaker 0: that

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: Hi, it's Robert F. Kennedy Jr. here, your HHS secretary. At HHS, we have a division called the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARDA. BARDA drives some of our most advanced scientific research. It funds developments of vaccines, drugs, diagnostics, and other tools to fight emerging diseases and national health threats. Over the past few weeks, BARDA reviewed 22 mRNA vaccine development investments and began canceling them. Let me explain why. Most of these shots are for flu or COVID, but as the pandemic showed us, mRNA vaccines don't perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract. Here's the problem: mRNA only codes for a small part of the viral proteins, usually a single antigen. One mutation and the vaccine becomes ineffective. This dynamic drives a phenomena called antigenic shift, meaning that the vaccine paradoxically encourages new mutations and can actually prolong pandemics as the virus constantly mutates to escape the protective effects of the vaccine. Millions of people, maybe even you or someone you know, caught the omicron variant despite being vaccinated. That's because a single mutation can make mRNA vaccines ineffective. The same risk applies to flu. After reviewing the science and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses. That's why after extensive review, BARDA has begun the process of terminating these 22 contracts totaling just under $500,000,000 To replace the troubled mRNA programs, we're prioritizing the development of the safer, broader vaccine strategies, like whole virus vaccines and novel platforms that don't collapse when viruses mutate. Let me be absolutely clear: HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them. That's why we're moving beyond the limitations of mRNA for respiratory viruses and investing in better solutions. Thank you. Produced by the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.

No vaccine has previously been released to the public without animal testing, especially for children. The animal tests were halted because the animals were dying. Now, the American public is essentially part of an experimental program, as human testing was not completed. Businesses are pushing to mandate this experimental vaccine for employment, despite a rising death count that is being overlooked.

The COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out under a series of laws that allowed the military to take over distribution, bypassing typical clinical trials and safety testing. The FDA's involvement was a "pretend authorization," as their mandate is to regulate interstate commerce of medical products, not countermeasures. The Department of Defense is fully in charge of the development, clinical trials, manufacturing, and distribution of the vaccines, utilizing "other transaction authority" (OTA), initially intended for NASA and weapons procurement. The vaccines are purchased under OTA as demonstration products, exempting them from FDA and CDC authority. Pharmaceutical companies were brought in largely for branding purposes, while the military oversaw manufacturing and distribution through military contractors.

Our government is out of control on this, and they are lawless. They completely disregard bioethics. They completely disregard the federal common rule. They have broken all the rules that I know of, that I've been trained on for years and years and years. These mandates of an experimental vaccine are explicitly illegal. They are explicitly inconsistent with the Nuremberg Code. They're explicitly inconsistent with the Belmont Report. They are flat out illegal, and they don't care. And the only

Americans are programmed to trust only FDA-approved drugs, but Big Pharma buys the FDA's approval. The FDA stopped independently reviewing all drugs about 30 years ago. Drugmakers can pay a lump sum upfront, such as $10,000,000, to get immediate approval to sell their products. The approval is granted if the drugmaker believes and can prove through their own research studies that the drug is safe and effective.

None of the vaccines, including the COVID vaccine, have undergone proper testing. No childhood vaccine has completed a placebo-controlled clinical trial with sufficient duration and power to confirm its safety before being administered to millions of children in America. This is not an opinion; it can be verified by anyone visiting the FDA website, where the package inserts and clinical trial documents are available for review.

Speaker 0 discusses the origin and framing of pandemic prevention and vaccine development as a military-led initiative. He cites a 2012 DARPA program called the Adept Protect p three program, described as a pandemic prevention platform. The proposal outlined the use of gene-encoded vaccines based on RNA or DNA with the goal of stopping a pandemic within sixty days. He suggests that, by the time President Trump referenced “Operation Warp Speed” to develop vaccines, there should have been preparation and acknowledgement that this work dated back to 2012, making it not rapid innovation but a decade-long effort. He argues that the public narrative of rapid development and stunning innovation surrounding vaccines is deceptive and that contractors like Moderna had already secured multi-million-dollar contracts in 2013. He notes that the military operates programs addressing biological threats and also works on answers such as monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. The claim is made that the military originated the idea of messenger RNA vaccines, not Pfizer or Moderna, and not in response to the outbreak from Wuhan. According to the speaker, this is a military program in origin and administration. The speaker asserts that Health and Human Services, under Alex Azar, together with the Department of Defense, ushered the public into a vaccine era, framing Emergency Use Authorization as a mechanism to rapidly deploy new technology into the military rather than the public. He contends that this mechanism’s broad public application began with the COVID-19 pandemic, which is presented as evidence that the FDA lacks ownership or control over the process because the program is characterized as military in origin and execution. The overall claim is that the program operates like a military operation with universal reach and without exemptions, implying a deeply embedded military approach to vaccine development and deployment. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the continuity from a 2012 program proposal through to the public health landscape observed during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, asserting that the military’s involvement, timeline, and governance underlie the current vaccine paradigm and its regulatory pathways.

Vaccine manufacturers are uniquely protected from design defect claims, unlike manufacturers of other products like planes, cars, and drugs. This immunity was granted in 1986 through the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act because manufacturers of the three routine childhood vaccines (MMR, Polio, and DTP) faced excessive liability and potential bankruptcy due to harm caused by their products. Instead of requiring safer products, Congress granted immunity, allowing manufacturers to continue selling vaccines regardless of potential harm. This immunity extended to all future routine childhood vaccines. Consequently, the CDC schedule has expanded from 3 injections in the first year of life in 1986 to 29 today. Pharmaceutical companies developing these vaccines know they won't be liable for injuries. Unlike typical drug trials, vaccine trials often lack placebo controls (except for the COVID-19 vaccine), have short safety review periods (days, weeks, or up to six months), and are underpowered, making it difficult to confirm product safety.