reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Багато скандалів з семитиці. Важко ставитися до бійців, яких ловлять примусово. Я мала три діда на позиціях, один зупинився там, де не можна було, і я майже його розстріляла. Не розуміла, як вони можуть воювати, не знаючи, як користуватися зброєю. Один навіть сам себе підірвав, вкручуючи гранату. Translation: Many scandals with the semitics. It's hard to deal with forcibly caught fighters. I had three grandfathers on positions, one stopped where he shouldn't have, and I almost shot him. I didn't understand how they could fight without knowing how to use weapons. One even blew himself up while screwing in a grenade.

During World War II, brutal massacres were carried out by the communists in various countries, including Poland and Russia. Stalin ordered the execution of thousands of Polish officers, while the Jewish secret police chief, Lavrentia Beria, sent millions of people to slave labor camps. The Kading Forest Massacre resulted in the execution of over 10,000 Polish officers. The Soviet report blamed the Germans for this massacre, but evidence suggests that it was actually committed by Stalin's NKVD. The German bombings of German cities, the rape and murder of German civilians, and the mistreatment of German prisoners of war are also discussed.

Intercepted messages of the SS indicate very large numbers were dealt with. In 1942 and 1943, in the four camps Operation Reinhard on the Eastern front along the River Gruk, the camps Sovevor, Belzec, Majonek, and Treblinka. The chief in Dublin, a man called Otila Blavoshnik, liquidating a total of 1,250,000.00 in 1942 and probably about the same number in 1943. So he got about 2,800,000.0 in in those two operations. Added to that, the shootings in on the Eastern Front and in Poland in '19 in the pre in the previous years, and finally, declaration of the Jews in Slovakia and Hungary in in 1944. And you you come to a figure that's, give or take, close to the figure that the Jews themselves now spout.

During World War II, the Germans ran prison and labor camps, including Auschwitz in Poland. The Holocaust, the genocide of 6 million Jews and 5 million non-Jews, is said to have taken place there. However, some people question the evidence and claim it has never been proven. The Auschwitz main camp, now a tourist attraction, is presented as a gas chamber and crematorium, but there are doubts about its authenticity. The gas chamber is a reconstruction, and there are discrepancies in the information provided by tour guides and experts. The Soviet Union, which provided much of the evidence, has a history of propaganda and deception. The debate about the Holocaust continues.

Zuby posed a question about what people in Germany were like after 1945. The response: after the occupation of Germany, the Soviets engaged in the biggest mass rape in recorded human history, with the majority of assaults committed in the Soviet occupation zone. Estimates of the numbers of German women raped by Soviet soldiers have ranged up to 2,000,000. According to historian William Hitchcock, in many cases, women were the victims of repeated rapes, some as many as 60 to 70 times. At least a 100,000 women were believed to have been raped in Berlin based on surging abortion rates in the following months and contemporary hospital reports, with an estimated ten thousand women dying in the aftermath. Female deaths in connection with the rapes in Germany overall are estimated at two hundred and forty thousand. Antony Beaver describes it as the greatest phenomenon of mass rape in history. Soviet soldiers raped German females from eight to 80 years old. The speaker then questions why this isn’t learned about in countless World War II lessons in high school, and notes that if you’re in high school watching, you should ask your history teacher why you don’t know about any of this, anticipating the teacher’s likely response of, oops. Sorry, lol.

I went out with my protector who claimed to be my adopted godson and helped confiscate property from Jews. It may sound like a traumatic experience, but it didn't bother me at all, even as a child. I didn't feel any guilt.

During World War 2, the Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin al-Husseini, had a significant presence in Germany. He was given a high rank in the SS and a monthly allowance to establish an Arab bureau in Berlin. Himmler put him in charge of Arabic broadcasting, where he called for an Arab uprising against the British and incited violence against Jews. The Mufti considered the British, Americans, and Jews as enemies, particularly targeting Jews for destruction. He even managed to cancel plans to let thousands of Jews escape to Palestine. As Germany suffered heavy casualties, Himmler began recruiting Muslims from the Balkans to join the fight.

From 1923 to 1933, German nationalists were targeted by Jewish communists and terrorists, resulting in numerous deaths and injuries. Acts of terror continued, including the burning of the Reichstag in 1933. Hitler and Hindenburg took action, arresting communist leaders and issuing emergency decrees. The Night of the Long Knives in 1934 saw the execution of individuals planning a coup against Germany. In 1938, a Polish Jew murdered a German diplomat, triggering riots against Jewish and communist businesses. Goebbels ordered the violence to stop, and Hitler expressed his anger. The Kristallnacht events were often portrayed as spontaneous anti-Semitic riots, but the history books fail to mention the repeated acts of terror that provoked German resentment. A secret deal called the Transfer Agreement allowed German Jews to migrate to Palestine with their assets intact. Hitler supported Jewish immigration to Palestine until the war prevented further collaboration.

During the attack at Dar Yassin, many Arabs died, including women, children, and the elderly. The Jewish fighters killed around 110 Arabs, and their bodies were mutilated. Houses were targeted with hand grenades, and women and children were killed. Some bodies were thrown down wells, and their jewelry was stolen, with fingers and earlobes cut off.

Camps in Poland were set up to help Jews immigrate. The Nazis called it the "final solution" to move Jews from Europe to the East, Palestine, or Madagascar.

There is a dark matter still in the world today: human ritual sacrifice, an ancient practice, and it has been something for which Jewish extremists have often been accused throughout time. Understandably, many people are skeptical of this bizarre accusation that has the Jewish people for at least two thousand years. After all, why would fanatical Jews in the past and perhaps even to this very day commit human sacrifice? Many people do not like to even think about the topic, believing it to be pure anti-Jewish propaganda. Likewise, the Jews themselves are quick to say that such claims are lies handed down through the centuries. However, there are two sides to this issue. One side believes Jewish ritual murder is not merely anti-Jewish propaganda, but a fact that has had a terrible impact on society since it began. Perhaps some viewers may doubt what is uncovered in this video, but an honest glimpse into this matter may make you think. Likewise, an in-depth and fair examination will make most skeptics into true believers. It is true that many of the people who conducted research into these matters were branded by Jews with the epithet of anti-Semite. A term used by Jews to stifle discussion on any topic that criticizes them. Certainly, however, if someone who is branded an anti-Semite by Jews says the sky appears blue on a sunny day, is it any less blue just because the so-called anti-Semite said it was? This is usually the case with respect to these matters. While some people who investigated these matters were really anti-Semites, it was the fact that human sacrifice was practiced by Jews that caused many of these people to become anti-Semites. After uncovering the secret among the Jewish cult in times past, how could a Gentile feel otherwise? After all it is not the anti-Semite who commits the foul act of human sacrifice, now commonly referred to as Jewish ritual murder. Yet Jews sought to make the Gentiles who reported these crimes appear worse than the Jews who committed them. Most historians know and admit that human sacrifice has occurred in the past amongst various sects. The Aztecs’ blood-stained temples attest to this. Many innocents met their fate that way with their hearts plucked from their bodies. The practice called in India where women would sacrifice themselves in flames is still practiced today in obscure parts where some of India's 1,000,000,000 mostly Hindus live. In Mexico, even just a few years ago, a strange cult was uncovered that had sacrificed many people, including American college student Mark Kilroy. The same is true of Africa and various parts of South America today. If you merely comb the Internet, you’ll realize that, yes, there are some groups who still engage in barbaric practices such as human sacrifice. So what are the facts about the Jews? Have they also engaged in such terrible acts in the past? And could there be some proven sect amongst Jews, extremists no doubt, who to this very day still commit the wicked crime of ritual murder. Most Jews have asked about ritual murder will vehemently deny any knowledge of it, of course. And they’re probably telling you the truth. If there are Jewish hate mongers who engage in these acts and there is strong evidence to indicate such, it is probably only a small number of them. So if this is indeed the case, one question still remains. What makes these crimes stand apart from other cruel acts committed by man against man in the past? The answer to this question is not a pretty one. Based on numerous reports from the past to modern times, the main difference is the degree of cruelty. Reports say children sacrificed in Jewish occult rights were tortured to death in the most cruel and heartless ways imaginable. After the ceremony, Jews reportedly dried the child’s blood, often absorbing it into paper, for their various occult rights. Aside from claims of Jewish ritual murder being carried out in an extremely vicious manner, there’s one other difference that sets this crime apart from others. When such crimes are uncovered, not only the local Jewish groups, but Jews from all over the entire world seek to conceal it. In the past, Jews have even set aside a special fund to cover up such acts. However, by doing this they become as a police might say, an accessory after the fact. From time to time, there have been brave and honest Jews who would deviate from their kinsfolk and admit to the truth of these crimes. While such honesty was not common amongst Jews, it still occurred on occasions. For this reason alone, indictment against all Jews cannot be made. Indeed, some Jews, young and old, have admitted these crimes in front of court, written about them in books, discussed them in debates, and so forth. For the most part, however, Jews typically deny such accusations. They have even developed a phrase for this type of accusation, blood libel. This term is often used as a rallying cry amongst Jewish groups.

One group sought vengeance for the Holocaust, believing 6,000,000 Germans should die to avenge the 6,000,000 Jews murdered. They called themselves the Jewish avengers, or Nakam. Their targets were the populations of Nuremberg, Hamburg, Frankfurt, and Munich, not just individual Nazis. Yehuda Maimon, an Auschwitz survivor, was in charge of logistics. Their plan, called Plan A, was to poison the water supplies of these four major cities. Kovner wanted Germans to experience indiscriminate murder, as the Jews had.

To illustrate the scale under Himmler, the speaker cites two documents. In the 1941 invasion of Russia, four army groups were followed by an Einsatzgruppe and multiple Einsatzkommandos, about 10–15 four‑wheel vehicles, with officers, an ammunition truck and a food wagon. They visited towns where Jews had been rounded up with the help of local Jewish councils and were liquidated by the Einsatzkommandos. A document from the Cowan (Kaunas) archives, directed from Riga, is read: a telegram to Anzaskommando 3 in Reval and Anzaskommando 3B in Kovno, asking for immediate report on executions by category and by women and children. Jaeger’s reply lists up to 02/01/1942 numbers for Anzaskommando 3A: Jews 136,421; communists 1,064; partisans 56; mentally sick 653; Poles 44; Russians 6,268; Gypsies 5; Armenians 1; overall 138,272; women 55,556; children 34,464. "that's probably as many children as we killed in Dresden in one hour in 1945." "I think myself that those are genuine documents." and "one aspect of the killing operations that Timna commanded."

Children with disabilities, including Down syndrome, cardiac anomalies, and cerebral palsy, were targeted for killing. Public health nurses deceived families, promising the best care for their children if they were given up. Nurses administered fatal overdoses and took children outside to hasten their deaths. The speaker became interested in understanding how nurses justified these killings. Propaganda promoting the idea of killing for the state's benefit was widespread, even in children's schoolbooks. German law required midwives and physicians to report infants with birth defects, who were then placed in institutions. The infants were frequently moved to different institutions without parental consent. It is crucial for nurses to be aware of this history to prevent its recurrence.

I went out with my protector who claimed to be my adopted godson and helped confiscate property from Jews. It may sound like a traumatizing experience, but it didn't bother me at all, even as a child. I didn't feel any guilt.

But after a time, these operations changed in character. From about September 1941 onwards, they began taking the women and children too. And Himmler justified this in a very famous speech in October 1943 in Poznan, where he said, a lot of you SS generals in front of me understand why we were killing the Jews, but you don't understand why we were killing the women and children too. He said, well, you've to realize that women are just as lethal as men in partisan warfare. And as for the children, there's no point leaving them alive, and they're going to come back two years two generations later to take their revenge on us.

German anti-partisan reprisals were usually effective in reducing partisan activity in Western Europe, but failed in the Soviet Union. Judy Battalion writes of the extensive involvement of Jewish women in resistance efforts against Germany during World War II, expressing surprise that she had never heard these stories before. According to the speaker, the extensive involvement of Jewish women in resistance efforts has been intentionally kept quiet. If the murderous female participation in these organizations were widely known, people would understand that Jews were interned in camps and ghettos because German authorities considered Jewish civilians a serious threat to German military operations during World War II, not simply because Hitler hated Jews.

In the last four years of war, Germany faced enormous battlefield casualties and a desperate need for fighting men. Heinrich Himmler begins recruiting Muslims from the Balkans with enthusiastic help from the Grand Mufti, Amin al-Husseini. The Mufti helps raise the Bosnian Muslim 13th SS division, Khansjar, along with other units that the Mufti calls his Arab legion. Altogether, the Grand Mufti helps recruit 30,000 men for the Nazi war machine. Ironically, in Nazi racial theory, Arabs are considered an inferior racial stock and not eligible for SS membership. Himmler treats foreign SS units with contempt as second-class citizens. But after an extensive physical examination for the Mufti, he makes an exception, with Hitler’s approval. The personal physician of the Grand Mufti evaluated him and said, “he is not an Arab. He’s a Caucasian, almost an Aryan. So we can expect that he will be a really reliable ally for us.” The SS division Hansjar is deployed to hunt down underground resistors in Yugoslavia and acts as an internal security force in Hungary. The division is responsible for a series of atrocities against partisans and Jews. In April 1945, as Allied troops push into Germany in the final battles of the war in Europe, the story of the Mufti’s Muslim regiments takes a final twist. Among the Nazi troops making their last suicidal stand near Hitler’s bunker are 100 men of the Mufti’s Arab Legion. With the Allied victory, the war ends. But the influence of Nazi Germany on the Middle East is far from over.

During World War II, people from various countries supported Germany, challenging anti-Hitler propaganda. Nuremberg racial laws in Germany restricted Jewish rights and intermarriage. Similar laws existed in the USA and Liberia. Israel also enforces discriminatory laws, favoring Jews over non-Jews. Despite misconceptions, Hitler did not hate all Jews and even protected some. Many Jews served in the German military, including high-ranking officers. History shows complexities, with Jews fighting alongside Germans against Bolshevism. The German army had diverse volunteers from around the world. Contrary to popular belief, some individuals with Jewish heritage were honored and respected in National Socialist Germany.

After World War II, Germany faced a dark period with the Soviet occupation resulting in mass rapes of German women. Historians estimate up to 2 million women were assaulted, with some enduring repeated rapes. In Berlin alone, around 100,000 women were raped, leading to an estimated 10,000 deaths. Overall, approximately 240,000 women died due to these atrocities. This mass rape is considered the greatest in history. It is shocking that this aspect of history is not widely taught in schools, so students should question why this information is often overlooked.

In the early 1900s, various articles in The New York Times mentioned the plight of 6,000,000 Jews facing famine, disease, and death in Central and Eastern Europe. The articles highlighted the horrifying conditions and the need for a billion-dollar fund to help these individuals. This was years before Hitler's rise to power, showing the longstanding struggles of the Jewish population. Additionally, Russia was reported to have faced the extermination of 6,000,000 Jews through massacre in 1931. These articles shed light on the tragic circumstances faced by millions of Jewish people.

The transcript presents an extensive compilation of claims from a group of speakers arguing that the established Holocaust narrative is false or exaggerated and that many historical incidents have been misrepresented or fabricated by Allied propaganda, Soviet influence, and Jewish-led organizations. The speakers frame Holocaust revisionism as a legitimate scholarly effort rather than denial, asserting that revisionists do not dispute that Jews and others suffered and died in the war, but dispute the scale, methods, and specifics of extermination. Key asserted points and claims - Holocaust definition and revisionism - The Holocaust is described as a belief that 6,000,000 Jews were murdered primarily by gassing in “shower rooms,” a narrative the speakers say is amplified by Hollywood, media, and schools. A growing movement of scientists, historians, engineers, journalists, and free-speech activists is portrayed as revisionist, though often branded as “Holocaust deniers” to discourage discourse. Revisionists are said not to deny persecution, deprivation of civil rights, deportation, internment, forced labor, or deaths in camps and ghettos, including deaths from disease; they also say that many victims died in ways other than genocide and that many victims’ dignity is not denied. - Internment and civilian camps in the United States - After Pearl Harbor, over 100,000 people of Japanese descent on the Pacific Coast were interned by Executive Order 9066; the text claims this restricted freedoms, required identity cards, and denied compensation or war reparations. The narrative includes accounts of interned individuals describing camp life, guard presence, and harsh conditions. - General wartime devastation and context - The war is described as a conflict that would not have occurred if “international jury” had not declared war on Germany in 1933, with emphasis on typhus, subversion, and crowded camps as drivers of disease and death. The speakers stress that millions died across battlefields, ships, and cities, and that propaganda surrounding German crimes obscures Allied or Soviet misdeeds. - Claims about typhus, gas chambers, and cremation - Typhus epidemics are said to explain many deaths in camps; Cyclone B (hydrogen cyanide) is claimed to have been used for delousing and pest control rather than execution, with several speakers arguing that gas chambers as homicidal devices did not exist or were technically infeasible. They assert there is no scientific proof of gassing, no German documents proving extermination plans, and that cremation and delousing procedures served health purposes rather than execution purposes. - Expert testimonies and forensics are cited (e.g., Leuchter, Rudolf, Lift, Lindsay) to support the claim that the gas chambers could not have functioned as execution facilities, noting technical impossibilities such as lack of explosion-proof features, gasketed doors, or proper gas delivery systems. - Specific camp narratives and testimonies - The camps are described as having been centers of labor, medical care, and even cultural activity, with accounts of weddings, births, nurseries, orchestras, libraries, theater performances, and recreational activities. Some testimonies describe attempts to maintain humanity and morale under harsh conditions, including a piano in Block 1, children’s art, and soccer games. - Several testimonies challenge the image of mass exterminations, claiming instead that most deaths resulted from disease, starvation, and Allied bombing, and that Red Cross and Vatican inquiries found no evidence of homicidal gas chambers. - A number of survivor testimonials are presented as quotations or paraphrases challenging the notion of mass murder in gas chambers, with some individuals denying personal knowledge of gas chambers or mass killings. - Documentary, legal, and scholarly disputes - The Institute for Historical Review (IHR) and other revisionist scholars are described as measuring and challenging the established narrative, sometimes facing legal or financial pressure. The transcript cites various researchers and forensics teams (e.g., Leuchter, Krakov, Farison, Groff, Farison, Larsson) as having concluded that homicidal gassings were not technically feasible in the cited facilities. - It is claimed that many postwar figures and witnesses provided testimonies or stories later recognized as unreliable or fabricated, including famous Holocaust survivors whose accounts are presented as inconsistent or false. Names and cases (e.g., Herman Rosenblatt, Anne Frank, Elie Wiesel) are invoked to illustrate alleged fraud or manipulation, though these claims contradict well-established historical records. - Propaganda, media, and the so-called “Holocaust industry” - The text asserts that the Holocaust narrative is used as a tool to enforce globalist policy, promote multiculturalism, and suppress nationalist sentiments among white Europeans. It claims that ongoing denazification efforts, legal penalties for questioning the Holocaust, and control over media and online platforms are designed to suppress dissent and promote a one-sided portrayal. - There is a claim that “atrocity propaganda” and black propaganda have been used to shape public perception, with references to Sefton Delmer and Allied psychological warfare, and accusations that postwar trials and media representations were heavily biased or manipulated. - Population counts, mortality figures, and documentary evidence - Several sections contest the veracity of the commonly cited death tolls, the reliability of Red Cross and other international communications, and the authenticity of diaries and eyewitness testimonies. The transcript asserts that the Nuremberg trials did not use physical or technical evidence to establish gas chamber existence and that some documents used as proof were mistranslated or contextualized wrongly. - The piece repeatedly emphasizes that millions of Jews did not die in the camps, that the “6,000,000” figure is a symbolic or religious number, and that high-profile Holocaust narratives are part of a constructed orthodoxy. - Final framing - The speakers position Holocaust revisionism as a defense of free speech and historical inquiry, arguing that questioning the official narrative is essential to truth. They claim laws against denial suppress inquiry and that truth should stand on its own merits without legal protection. They also suggest that conflicting accounts, forged documents, and political agendas have shaped the popular memory of World War II. Note on structure and tone - The transcript interweaves personal testimonials, expert opinions, documentary references, and polemical assertions. It repeatedly contrasts “revisionists” with conventional accounts, often asserting that mainstream portrayals are driven by propaganda, financial interests, or political goals. The overall thrust is to challenge the conventional understanding of the Holocaust, question the evidentiary basis for extermination claims, and highlight alleged inconsistencies in survivor narratives and official records.

- "Germany is our public enemy number one. It is our object to declare war without mercy against her." - "A worldwide Jewish boycott of German goods began." - "20,000 Jews protested at New York City Hall." - "Samuel Untermeyer, speaking on behalf of international jury, declared war on Germany with an economic boycott." - "The front page of the March 24 London Daily Express carried the headline Judea declares war on Germany." - "Jewish leaders were quoted as calling for a holy war against the German people." - "In August 1933, Samuel Untermeyer talked about a planned annihilation and extermination of Jews underway and also about a war that must be waged against Germany to stop it." - "In a hysterical radio broadcast, Untermeo called for the Jews to destroy Germany in a sacred war denouncing the Germans as cruel, savage beasts and ingrates."

I was in the army, tough Israeli. 6 soldiers testified to indiscriminate violence in Palestine. They shot without distinction, targeted all males 16-50, and killed those who looked at them. Palestinians were killed fleeing a school, treated homes as souvenir shops, and destroyed property. Soldiers were bored, drew on walls, stole money, and burned down houses after use. Despite objections, commanders ordered destruction.

As a child in Hebrew school, I learned about the Holocaust and questioned why the Germans acted as they did. My father's explanation of anti-Semitism didn't resonate with me, as I believed there should be a motive for such actions. The truth is often obscured. Benjamin Friedman’s 1961 speech sheds light on this. During World War I, Zionist Jews convinced England not to surrender, promising support if they granted Palestine. This led to over 100,000 American casualties and Germany's defeat. The Treaty of Versailles crippled Germany, and when they discovered the Zionists' secret deal, they felt betrayed. Friedman compares this to a hypothetical situation where Americans would feel similarly if a group secretly aided an enemy during a war. This illustrates the resentment that grew in 1920s Germany, although it did not lead to immediate harm against Jews.