reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker wrote a book in 1975 about the 1956 Hungarian uprising using CIA files. The files revealed the uprising began as an anti-Jewish pogrom, not an anti-communist revolution. The Hungarian people viewed their 1950s government as Jewish, and the secret police (AVH) as a Jewish secret police. After the Red Army entered Hungary in 1945, Jews who had taken refuge in the Soviet Union were given important positions, including roles in the secret police. By 1956, Hungarians hated Jews, viewing them as responsible for their suffering. From 1940-1941, the NKVD, with largely Jewish officers, occupied countries under the Hitler-Stalin pact, liquidating middle-class entrepreneurs, priests, businessmen, and intellectuals. When Hitler's armies invaded, they found the local population already retaliating against the Jews. The speaker was accused of antisemitism for writing about this, but believes historians must report their discoveries.

Speaker 0 expresses a view that the government is full of liars, accusing both sides of the political spectrum of dishonesty. The conversation then shifts to a provocative claim: "They insisted Hitler was bad and he was not. You don't think Hitler was bad? No. Not at all. There was no holocaust." This remark represents a stark reversal of widely accepted historical consensus, asserting that there was no Holocaust. The speaker describes a surprising personal justification for this belief, saying, "I've I've seen evidence. I my aunt Georgie was in a prison camp and she told me about it and there was no torture, there was no killing." The claim places emphasis on the anecdote of the speaker’s aunt, Georgie, who allegedly was "in a prison camp" and told the speaker about it, specifically asserting that "there was no torture" and "there was no murder." The speaker then elaborates that the aunt was "a Jew in in Germany," which adds a personal and ethnic dimension to the claim, suggesting that a Jewish person in Germany would have firsthand experience of the camp. In continuing, the speaker reiterates the assertion: "There was no torture. There was no murder." The description of the alleged camp life offered by the aunt includes contrasting details such as "films," "an orchestra," "movies," and "a soccer team," painting a picture of a benign environment within the context of a Nazi-prison setting. A further provocative assertion is included: "A Jew started the SS." This statement is presented as part of the aunt’s account or the speaker’s interpretation of the camp’s history, introducing a controversial claim about the origins of the Schutzstaffel. Overall, the speaker challenges the widely accepted historical record by claiming that Hitler was not bad, that there was no Holocaust, and that the aunt’s testimony describes a benign camp life with cultural and recreational elements, culminating in the assertion that a Jew started the SS. The dialogue thus presents a sequence of controversial statements grounded in the speaker’s belief based on an account from their aunt Georgie.

Speaker 0 presents a claim about a crime against white people committed by Jews, noting it has received little attention in the mainstream press and is not widely depicted in media or entertainment. The transcript asserts that the crime is sex slavery of white women, captured by Jewish gangs and forced to work in brothels in Israel and elsewhere. It asserts that articles about white slavery rarely identify Jews as the perpetrators, instead using euphemisms like Russian gangs or Russian organized crime, and that journalists avoid naming Jews to preserve employment. The narrative explains the enticement into sex slavery starts with poverty created in part by the collapse of a Jew-created communist system in Eastern Europe, followed by privatization and predatory business practices by reformers described as often Jewish. It claims this leads to widespread poverty in Russia, Ukraine, Moldova, and other countries, with women advertising for marriage to Western men on matchmaker sites as an escape. It states many breadwinners earn less than $30 a month, making promises of easy housework or waitress jobs overseas appealing, and that many end up in Israel where sex slavery is especially common and often tacitly approved by authorities. It asserts Jewish gangs maintain worldwide networks, selling enslaved women to brothels in Europe, Turkey, and Asia, and that many victims are tricked or coerced after passport seizures. The transcript recounts individual stories: - Laura Matveyava: recruited under the pretense of easy housework in Germany; in Hamburg, passports were confiscated; she was forced into prostitution, imprisoned in brothels masquerading as bars/nightclubs, and escaped after six months. She states most other slaves wanted to escape but feared beatings and deportation. - Irina (Ukraine): brought to Haifa, passport burned, told she is property and must work until she earns her way out; she initially refused but was beaten and raped until submission. - Mariana: lured by promises of work in Israel, worked in a brothel associated with seven days a week service; she describes isolation, monitoring, and attempts to escape. - Valentina: describes horrible conditions, venereal diseases, bars on windows, guards, and eventual escape attempt. - Ilona and Yana: describe details of being sold to pimps, multiple clients daily, beatings, and forced work in massage parlors and bars across Israel. The text cites authorities and organizations: - Amnesty International criticized Israel for tolerating the sex slave industry and for failing to prevent, investigate, and punish violations against trafficked women. - Estimates are cited: 500,000 white women enslaved in Russia alone; 100,000 Russian women smuggled out in one year; 200 sex slave brothels in Tel Aviv; white women described as the most lucrative commodity by some sources. - Israeli police and officials are depicted as complicit or indifferent, with examples including a former Israeli police officer owning a pimp operation and a Haifa police official describing large profits from trafficking. - The UN is cited as admitting that selling sex slaves is the fastest growing organized crime business, with white women as the majority of victims; the Sydney Morning Herald is quoted calling white women the most lucrative commodity. The speaker concludes by condemning the Jewish media for obscuring these crimes and urges the audience to remember and not trust them, asserting that many white women are enslaved and exploited, and that this issue is neglected by Western media.

During World War I, Germany faced chaos, poverty, and social issues, but experienced an economic boom and regained hope when the National Socialists came to power. However, envy and fear from other nations led to World War II, the deadliest war in history. Germany suffered terror bombing by the British, and the Soviet Union committed atrocities against German civilians. The Allied forces, including Americans and British, engaged in looting, rape, and killing, while German prisoners of war were mistreated and many died from starvation and neglect. Men in American camps were forced to drink their own urine, and the International Red Cross's efforts were rejected. Eisenhower's program of mistreatment resulted in the deaths of at least 1.5 million German prisoners. Denazification became a cover for rape, torture, and death, and the Morgenthau plan aimed to destroy Germany completely, causing widespread suffering. The expulsion of Germans from Eastern Germany led to around 2 million deaths. The suffering of the German people was largely ignored, while Allied leaders and their actions were shielded from criticism. The true horrors of war cannot be justified or ignored.

As a child, I questioned why the Germans committed atrocities during the Holocaust. The speaker believes the truth is hidden and suggests researching Benjamin Friedman's 1961 speech. They claim that Zionist Jews influenced World War I, leading to Germany's defeat and economic hardships. The speaker argues that Zionists prioritize establishing Israel over helping Jews during World War II. They draw parallels between historical events and current conflicts in Gaza, urging Jewish people to speak out against Zionism's actions. The speaker emphasizes the need for mass Jewish opposition to prevent further harm.

Stalin oversaw the expulsion of millions of Germans from their homes in Eastern Europe after World War II, resulting in the deaths of around 2 million women and children. Many more Germans died during similar expulsions in other countries. The atrocities committed during these expulsions, including beatings, looting, and starvation, were immense. Western leaders like Winston Churchill turned a blind eye to the suffering of the German population, leading to more deaths in the aftermath of the war than during the conflict itself.

During World War II, the Soviet Union was a military ally whose anti-Nazi propaganda was accepted and later integrated into historical accounts. One speaker states their belief that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. They then ask another speaker, the president of Iran and a scholar, if he believes that 6,000,000 Jews were killed by the Nazis, or if he thinks that is not true. The other speaker says he doesn't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed, and cautions that this statement is against the law in Germany, and could result in imprisonment.

Zuby posed a question about what people in Germany were like after 1945. The response: after the occupation of Germany, the Soviets engaged in the biggest mass rape in recorded human history, with the majority of assaults committed in the Soviet occupation zone. Estimates of the numbers of German women raped by Soviet soldiers have ranged up to 2,000,000. According to historian William Hitchcock, in many cases, women were the victims of repeated rapes, some as many as 60 to 70 times. At least a 100,000 women were believed to have been raped in Berlin based on surging abortion rates in the following months and contemporary hospital reports, with an estimated ten thousand women dying in the aftermath. Female deaths in connection with the rapes in Germany overall are estimated at two hundred and forty thousand. Antony Beaver describes it as the greatest phenomenon of mass rape in history. Soviet soldiers raped German females from eight to 80 years old. The speaker then questions why this isn’t learned about in countless World War II lessons in high school, and notes that if you’re in high school watching, you should ask your history teacher why you don’t know about any of this, anticipating the teacher’s likely response of, oops. Sorry, lol.

The speaker asserts that a significant amount of Holocaust evidence comes directly from the perpetrators admitting it, highlighting that much of the documentation and admissions come from those who carried out or facilitated the crimes. The point is framed as a rebuttal to Holocaust deniers, implying that denial ignores the primary sources and admissions from the perpetrators themselves. The speaker then critiques common perceptions of World War II education, arguing that there is a simplified or superficial understanding among many students. They describe a “cliff note version” of World War II that often circulates in general discourse, where the subject is reduced to a brief portion of a history class. In their view, World War II is “relegated to, like, a chapter and, like, sixth grade history,” representing a narrow and incomplete portrayal of the conflict. According to the speaker, this truncated education makes it easy for people to feel they have mastered the topic after just a brief exposure. They illustrate this frustration by noting that students may complete “two and a half days in history class,” and then feel they are an expert on World War II when, in reality, their understanding is minimal. The speaker contends that the superficial treatment of the war contributes to a broader misrepresentation of what actually happened. The implication is that a fuller, more nuanced understanding is needed rather than a cursory overview that reduces complex events to a few iconic moments. A specific example given is the tendency to emphasize well-known events or symbols, such as Normandy, Holocaust, and Hiroshima, with the effect that those topics become the focal points of the narrative. The speaker argues that this familiar triad is often treated as the entirety of the World War II story, limiting the audience’s awareness of the broader context and detail. In this context, the speaker mentions Nick Fuentes as someone who “will just relegate it down to cookies, you know, and ovens,” suggesting that such reductions oversimplify and distort the history. The phrase “the math doesn't add up” is used to imply that these oversimplifications fail to account for the complexity and scale of the events being discussed. Overall, the speaker emphasizes that a more comprehensive engagement with sources and events is necessary to understand the full scope of World War II and the Holocaust, rather than accepting a shallow, reductive narrative.

Jews are sensitive to criticism and censorship, shutting down discussions about them. They share their history but resist hearing about others' suffering, like what the US has inflicted. Hitler didn't harm as many as the US has.

Ukraine seems to be all about is called payback time. Ukrainians have been killing Jews for four hundred years. Ever since Komelniki in 1648 wiped out one third of European Jewry, and they've been doing a great job killing Jews. In fact, in World War two, they were more vicious than the Nazis. In fact, the Nazis had to say it, you know, they were well, we like the fact you're killing Jews. Let's show you how to be more efficient. So what's interesting is before the end of time, the banishment says, well, Ukraine has been especially active in killing Jews, so what I'm gonna do is destroy them.

Speaker 0: 6,000,000 number used lot many times before World War two by, like, newspapers. Is that true? I've seen that mentioned quite a bit with that being used. Speaker 1: If you wanna read up all on this, it's volume six of the Holocaust Hangposts here. It's the first Holocaust. Talks about all the many times that, particularly, New York Times was good at it, as I call it, the New York Times because it's owned and run by Jews. They were propagating the 6,000,000 number, and they were using first, the term Holocaust already during the czarist time in Russia before the first world war. 6,000,000 Jews are threatened. 6,000,000 Jews are dying. They're threatened by a holocaust. It goes into the first world war after the first world war with the Bolshevik revolution, the New York Times, the Jewish community in The United States to a large degree supporting the Bolshevist revolution, which was mainly a a Jewish supported revolution. Speaker 0: And Speaker 1: then you if that revolution collapses, the Jews are facing countrywide pogroms that would potentially wipe them out. So they knew it's either the the Bolshevik, revolution succeeds or we're gonna have a holocaust. And they were talking about that, in this context. When you support the Jews, 6,000,000 are about to die and so forth. It goes on. There is a straight line going from the eighteen eighties into the second world war Killing final five. 6,000,000 Jews are dying or threatened or being killed. So it's nothing new. The area, Russia, Poland, Germany has changed. The the villain, the czar, the white anti Bolshevik civil war people, or then Hitler and his acronies. Speaker 0: So what you’re saying is that— Speaker 1: So the ingredients to the story have changed, but not the story in general.

There is a dark matter still in the world today: human ritual sacrifice, an ancient practice, and it has been something for which Jewish extremists have often been accused throughout time. Understandably, many people are skeptical of this bizarre accusation that has the Jewish people for at least two thousand years. After all, why would fanatical Jews in the past and perhaps even to this very day commit human sacrifice? Many people do not like to even think about the topic, believing it to be pure anti-Jewish propaganda. Likewise, the Jews themselves are quick to say that such claims are lies handed down through the centuries. However, there are two sides to this issue. One side believes Jewish ritual murder is not merely anti-Jewish propaganda, but a fact that has had a terrible impact on society since it began. Perhaps some viewers may doubt what is uncovered in this video, but an honest glimpse into this matter may make you think. Likewise, an in-depth and fair examination will make most skeptics into true believers. It is true that many of the people who conducted research into these matters were branded by Jews with the epithet of anti-Semite. A term used by Jews to stifle discussion on any topic that criticizes them. Certainly, however, if someone who is branded an anti-Semite by Jews says the sky appears blue on a sunny day, is it any less blue just because the so-called anti-Semite said it was? This is usually the case with respect to these matters. While some people who investigated these matters were really anti-Semites, it was the fact that human sacrifice was practiced by Jews that caused many of these people to become anti-Semites. After uncovering the secret among the Jewish cult in times past, how could a Gentile feel otherwise? After all it is not the anti-Semite who commits the foul act of human sacrifice, now commonly referred to as Jewish ritual murder. Yet Jews sought to make the Gentiles who reported these crimes appear worse than the Jews who committed them. Most historians know and admit that human sacrifice has occurred in the past amongst various sects. The Aztecs’ blood-stained temples attest to this. Many innocents met their fate that way with their hearts plucked from their bodies. The practice called in India where women would sacrifice themselves in flames is still practiced today in obscure parts where some of India's 1,000,000,000 mostly Hindus live. In Mexico, even just a few years ago, a strange cult was uncovered that had sacrificed many people, including American college student Mark Kilroy. The same is true of Africa and various parts of South America today. If you merely comb the Internet, you’ll realize that, yes, there are some groups who still engage in barbaric practices such as human sacrifice. So what are the facts about the Jews? Have they also engaged in such terrible acts in the past? And could there be some proven sect amongst Jews, extremists no doubt, who to this very day still commit the wicked crime of ritual murder. Most Jews have asked about ritual murder will vehemently deny any knowledge of it, of course. And they’re probably telling you the truth. If there are Jewish hate mongers who engage in these acts and there is strong evidence to indicate such, it is probably only a small number of them. So if this is indeed the case, one question still remains. What makes these crimes stand apart from other cruel acts committed by man against man in the past? The answer to this question is not a pretty one. Based on numerous reports from the past to modern times, the main difference is the degree of cruelty. Reports say children sacrificed in Jewish occult rights were tortured to death in the most cruel and heartless ways imaginable. After the ceremony, Jews reportedly dried the child’s blood, often absorbing it into paper, for their various occult rights. Aside from claims of Jewish ritual murder being carried out in an extremely vicious manner, there’s one other difference that sets this crime apart from others. When such crimes are uncovered, not only the local Jewish groups, but Jews from all over the entire world seek to conceal it. In the past, Jews have even set aside a special fund to cover up such acts. However, by doing this they become as a police might say, an accessory after the fact. From time to time, there have been brave and honest Jews who would deviate from their kinsfolk and admit to the truth of these crimes. While such honesty was not common amongst Jews, it still occurred on occasions. For this reason alone, indictment against all Jews cannot be made. Indeed, some Jews, young and old, have admitted these crimes in front of court, written about them in books, discussed them in debates, and so forth. For the most part, however, Jews typically deny such accusations. They have even developed a phrase for this type of accusation, blood libel. This term is often used as a rallying cry amongst Jewish groups.

The speaker describes a family history of alleged ritualistic abuse and satanic practices, stating: “Also in worshiping the devil, participated in human sacrifice rituals rituals and cannibalism.” They assert an extensive family tree, claiming it “has gone back to, like, 1,700.” They contrast the outward appearance of their family with the reality inside, saying: “Does everyone else think it's a nice Jewish family? From the outside, appear to be a nice Jewish girl? Definitely. And you all are worshiping the devil inside the home? Right.” The speaker references broader involvement beyond their own family, noting: “There's other Jewish families across the country, not just my own family.” They describe rituals in which babies would be sacrificed and claim, “Who’s babies? There were people who bred babies in our family. No one would know about it. A lot of people were overweight, so you couldn't tell if they were pregnant or not.” They recount a childhood experience in which they were forced to participate: “When I was very young, I was forced to participate in that in which I had to sacrifice an infant. And the the purpose of sacrifice is to what? Is to bring you what? What are you sacrificing for? For power.” The response given to the question about the purpose of sacrifice is: “Power.” The speaker also discloses personal abuse within the narrative, stating: “Mhmm. I was molested. I was raped several times.” They then describe their mother’s current life and public image, asserting: “And what's your mother doing? She lives in the Chicago Metropolitan Area. She's on the Human Relations Commission of the town that she lives in, and she's an upstanding citizen. Nobody would suspect her.”

To illustrate the scale under Himmler, the speaker cites two documents. In the 1941 invasion of Russia, four army groups were followed by an Einsatzgruppe and multiple Einsatzkommandos, about 10–15 four‑wheel vehicles, with officers, an ammunition truck and a food wagon. They visited towns where Jews had been rounded up with the help of local Jewish councils and were liquidated by the Einsatzkommandos. A document from the Cowan (Kaunas) archives, directed from Riga, is read: a telegram to Anzaskommando 3 in Reval and Anzaskommando 3B in Kovno, asking for immediate report on executions by category and by women and children. Jaeger’s reply lists up to 02/01/1942 numbers for Anzaskommando 3A: Jews 136,421; communists 1,064; partisans 56; mentally sick 653; Poles 44; Russians 6,268; Gypsies 5; Armenians 1; overall 138,272; women 55,556; children 34,464. "that's probably as many children as we killed in Dresden in one hour in 1945." "I think myself that those are genuine documents." and "one aspect of the killing operations that Timna commanded."

I survived Auschwitz at 13, the sole survivor in my family. We were close to the gas chambers, smelling the burning bodies. The Holocaust is profitable, with Germany paying over $200 billion to Jews. Some receive $1,000 monthly. Few know Jewish ships brought slaves to America.

Speaker 0 urges historical perspective, noting the wartime Soviet alliance and that their anti-Nazi propaganda was accepted by the Allies; as victors, the Soviets "got to commit their propaganda to the history books as fact." He says current knowledge of Stalin's despotism and the KGB's deception, and the camps Majdanek, Belzec, Kelno, Treblinka, and Sobibor, have required relying on Soviet sources. "I believe in the inarguable fact that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and Nazis." He asks Speaker 2 if he believes that figure. Speaker 2 replies, "But I don't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed. Now be careful. I I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German somebody that's in German state, you could have me thrown into prison before I leave Germany."

But after a time, these operations changed in character. From about September 1941 onwards, they began taking the women and children too. And Himmler justified this in a very famous speech in October 1943 in Poznan, where he said, a lot of you SS generals in front of me understand why we were killing the Jews, but you don't understand why we were killing the women and children too. He said, well, you've to realize that women are just as lethal as men in partisan warfare. And as for the children, there's no point leaving them alive, and they're going to come back two years two generations later to take their revenge on us.

The Holocaust is a sensitive topic, used to guilt white people and criticize European nationalism. The secret lies in Russia. Jewish communists slaughtered millions of Christians and Chinese. Jews claim they're hated for their success, ignoring their role in massacres and corrupt banking practices. The Holocaust serves a dual purpose: to instill guilt in European children and anger in Jewish children, creating sympathy and rage, respectively. The Russian Revolution was, in reality, a Jewish revolution financed by Western Jewish bankers, who betrayed the Christian Whites. Key figures like Karl Marx, Lenin, and Trotsky were Jewish. These atrocities are missing from history books, allowing Jews to manipulate narratives. There's little physical evidence for the Holocaust, relying on witness testimonies, yet dissent is suppressed.

"Bankers control everything." They discuss World War II stats: "They broadcasted the number 6,000,000 for about the first twenty years from '19 I think it's, like, 1915 to 1939." They contrast with Red Cross stats: "271,000" and claim "Red Cross is owned by the Rothschilds." "That number has been revised many times." They state "the Christians which were taken out in World War two. That is 90,000,000. 90,000,000. Think about that." They observe "the Jewish population actually increased, which makes no sense." They mention "Eisenhower death camps, so most people don't know about that one. Those were American camps in Germany." They cite "World Book of Facts and Almanac," "revised in the nineteen sixties and seventies," noting "it wasn't revised while the truth was coming out. It was revised after. And that's kinda how they always do it."

During World War II, Jews were interned in camps and ghettos because they were considered hostile to Germany, with many actively participating in partisan activities against German troops. Jewish civilians joined partisan units, engaging in sabotage and intelligence missions. The Third Reich interned Jews to counter these operations. Jewish historian Dr. Judy Battalion notes the unexpectedly large number of Jewish women involved in resistance efforts, uncovering numerous accounts of female fighters. Many Jewish women employed stealth and disguises to kill Germans. Neuta Teitelbaum, disguised as an innocent young girl, assassinated a high-ranking Gestapo officer. Teitelbaum also killed another German.

During World War II, people from various countries supported Germany, challenging anti-Hitler propaganda. Nuremberg racial laws in Germany restricted Jewish rights and intermarriage. Similar laws existed in the USA and Liberia. Israel also enforces discriminatory laws, favoring Jews over non-Jews. Despite misconceptions, Hitler did not hate all Jews and even protected some. Many Jews served in the German military, including high-ranking officers. History shows complexities, with Jews fighting alongside Germans against Bolshevism. The German army had diverse volunteers from around the world. Contrary to popular belief, some individuals with Jewish heritage were honored and respected in National Socialist Germany.

After World War II, Germany faced a dark period with the Soviet occupation resulting in mass rapes of German women. Historians estimate up to 2 million women were assaulted, with some enduring repeated rapes. In Berlin alone, around 100,000 women were raped, leading to an estimated 10,000 deaths. Overall, approximately 240,000 women died due to these atrocities. This mass rape is considered the greatest in history. It is shocking that this aspect of history is not widely taught in schools, so students should question why this information is often overlooked.

As a child in Hebrew school, I learned about the Holocaust and questioned why the Germans acted as they did. My father's explanation of anti-Semitism didn't resonate with me, as I believed there should be a motive for such actions. The truth is often obscured. Benjamin Friedman’s 1961 speech sheds light on this. During World War I, Zionist Jews convinced England not to surrender, promising support if they granted Palestine. This led to over 100,000 American casualties and Germany's defeat. The Treaty of Versailles crippled Germany, and when they discovered the Zionists' secret deal, they felt betrayed. Friedman compares this to a hypothetical situation where Americans would feel similarly if a group secretly aided an enemy during a war. This illustrates the resentment that grew in 1920s Germany, although it did not lead to immediate harm against Jews.

The transcript asserts that Stalin’s plan to dominate Eastern Europe was aided by Eisenhower and Marshall due to their focus on invading Europe from England rather than advancing from the European “soft underbelly.” It claims that by July 1944, communists had advanced into Poland and Germany. It attributes the instigation of Soviet Red Army violence against German civilians to Ilya Ehrenberg, described as Stalin’s Jewish chief propagandist and a prominent member of the Soviet-sponsored Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee. According to the speaker, Ehrenberg urged mass rape and murder of German civilians as the Red Army approached German territory. The transcript cites Ehrenberg’s involvement with propaganda against Germans, including gloating statements about German women and references to Jews “around Roosevelt,” asserting that Ehrenberg sought extermination and genocide of the entire German people. It notes that Ehrenberg encouraged mass rape and killing, with leaflets declaring Germans “are not human beings” and containing messages such as “Nothing gives us so much joy as German corpses.” It mentions leaflets air dropped on troops near Danzig, allegedly composed by Ehrenberg and signed by Stalin, with the directive: “Kill them all.” The text quotes orders and exhortations to Soviet troops: “Men, old men, children and women, after you have amused yourself with them. Kill,” “Nothing in Germany is guiltless, neither the living nor the yet unborn,” and “Break the racial pride of the German woman. Take her as your legitimate booty.” It further claims that a massive violence followed, described as “an unimaginable orgy of violence and rape” that would become one of the ghastliest episodes in human history. Finally, the transcript asserts a quantitative outcome: “At least 2,000,000 German women young and old were gang raped, sodomized and beaten often in view of their children or family members.”