TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The CDC and NVSS changed death certificate reporting in violation of federal law. Two days later, the HHS increased reimbursement for hospitals and doctors who listed everything as COVID, making it the most lucrative diagnosis. There are reports of patients being starved and denied water, possibly to increase the use of Remdesivir. The range of fraudulent death certificates is estimated to be between 88.6% and 94.0%. Reimbursement for a diabetic patient labeled as COVID is 3 to 6 times higher. Hospitals had to go along with this to stay in business. Doctors who spoke up were threatened with license revocation and faced censorship. This is seen as collusion and murder for profit.

In 2020, only 2% of hospitalizations were related to Covid, with an average duration longer than other cases. Intensive care unit admissions were at 5%. This contradicts the perception that hospitals were overwhelmed with Covid patients. The numbers confirm that the fear and hysteria surrounding the virus were disproportionate. The consequences included increased suicides among young people and school closures. There may have been less harsh ways to handle the situation. It's unfortunate to say that the fear was exaggerated.

When someone dies with COVID-19, it's counted as a COVID-19 death, not just an infection. Doctors are being paid more for listing patients as COVID-19 cases, with $13,000 for a COVID-19 admission and $39,000 if the patient goes on a ventilator. Some believe this treatment approach is wrong and could harm many people.

The PCR test, commonly used for COVID-19, involves a nasal swab. According to Kary Mullis, the Nobel Prize-winning scientist who created the test, it can detect almost anything if amplified enough. However, Mullis himself stated that the PCR test should not be used to diagnose diseases, as it only detects fragments of illness. Many laboratories worldwide run the test at high amplification levels, leading to a high rate of false positives. Even Anthony Fauci acknowledged that results beyond 33 cycles are likely not infectious material. The New York Times reported that 90% of PCR tests were not indicative of active illness. Lowering the amplification cycles resulted in significant reductions in case numbers. In the past, PCR tests have caused false positives, such as in a whooping cough pseudoepidemic. Some criticize Fauci for misleading the public.

In Germany, all individuals who are diagnosed with Covid-19 and subsequently pass away are counted as Covid-19 cases, regardless of whether they had underlying health conditions. The crucial factor is the positive Covid-19 test result. The distinction between cases with or without underlying conditions is determined later on. Therefore, all cases that test positive for Covid-19 and result in death are reported as Covid-19 fatalities.

In 2020, the ATIH collected and analyzed hospital data, revealing that only 2% of hospitalizations were due to Covid. These Covid-related hospitalizations lasted an average of ten days, with 5% in intensive care. Contrary to the perception of overwhelmed hospitals, the numbers show that the fear and hysteria surrounding the pandemic were disproportionate. The consequences of lockdowns, such as increased suicides among young people and school closures, could have been avoided with less drastic measures. It is important to acknowledge that the fear surrounding Covid was exaggerated.

The definition of people dying from COVID is simple. If someone is diagnosed with COVID at the time of their death, it is counted as a COVID death. This means that even if someone was already in hospice and given a few weeks to live, but also had COVID, it would be counted as a COVID death. Similarly, if someone died from a different cause but had COVID at the same time, it would still be listed as a COVID death. It's important to note that being listed as a COVID death doesn't necessarily mean it was the cause of death, but rather that the person had COVID at the time of death.

Dying of COVID-19 in the hospital is seen as a failure because hospitals are meant to save lives. Surprisingly, there were very few deaths at home from COVID-19, raising questions about what went wrong in hospitals that led to so many deaths there. There were no reports of people dying at home from COVID-19 in the United States, where most deaths occurred in hospitals.

The PCR test, used to determine COVID-19 cases, amplifies RNA fragments to detect the virus. However, the high amplification can also detect traces of dead virus or remnants from other coronaviruses. Scientists recommend not testing over 30 cycle thresholds to avoid false positives. When labs reduced the cycles, case numbers significantly decreased. False positives can occur almost half the time, especially in populations with low COVID-19 prevalence. In the past, PCR tests have caused false epidemics. The test requires skilled technicians and careful handling, but it is currently being conducted on a large scale with hastily trained personnel. Therefore, it is important to question the accuracy of reported case numbers.

The stimulus bill intended to help hospitals overrun with COVID patients created an incentive to record something as COVID. Hospitals are in a bind because if a hospital is half full, it's hard to make ends meet. Checking a box can yield $8,000, and putting a patient on a ventilator for five minutes can bring $39,000. The alternative could be firing doctors. This situation presents a tough moral quandary.

The numbers of people who died of COVID are skewed because many unwell individuals were classified as suspected COVID without testing. Other health conditions seemed nonexistent during COVID, and care home residents who became unwell were automatically considered COVID positive. This caused frustration because the numbers don't accurately reflect COVID deaths. Deaths were classified as COVID positive, suspected COVID, or COVID-related, even with underlying health conditions. Scott Finnegan is Group General Manager for First and Lisa DiGiacomo is a director with Open Ministry Healthcare.

Many people who died with a COVID diagnosis were already in a fragile state, where even a minor infection could be fatal. However, it is questionable whether these infections should be considered the cause of death. For example, if we started registering every urinary tract infection that pushed a frail person over the edge, we would have an epidemic of urinary tract infections. The same kind of illogical attribution happened with COVID, where 3,000 expected deaths in hospices were attributed to the virus. This raises the question of what a death certificate should actually indicate: the specific cause of death on a particular day, or the overall cause of death within a certain timeframe.

Hospital deaths from COVID-19 are seen as a failure, as hospitals are meant to save lives. Surprisingly, there were very few deaths at home from COVID-19, raising questions about what went wrong in hospitals that led to so many deaths there.

Hospitals are receiving bonus payments for COVID cases, leading to high mortality rates and lack of transparency for families. The CARES Act incentivizes hospitals with payments for COVID tests, diagnoses, admissions, remdesivir use, ventilator use, and even COVID-related deaths on death certificates. This system is seen as the Biden administration paying hospitals to harm patients, with estimated payments of $100,000 per patient. The situation is dire and needs to be addressed urgently.

We ended our previous episode with our COVID pyramid, build layer upon layer of lies, deceit, fraud, scandals. Now, by now you’re wondering how so many hospitals, doctors, and health care workers went along with all of the above. We have reached the capstone of our nauseating COVID pyramid. Pyramid. We shall name the capstone M and M, money and murder in hospitals. Shocking as it may sound, we’ve seen it before. Remember the unjust administering the killer drug midazolam in The UK as shown in part 19? Well, The US and many other countries had their own version called remdesivir. Here’s what happened. Hospitals were given incentives, as in money, for each and every COVID casualty. According to whistleblowers, investigative journalists, lawyers, and specialists, Hospitals in The US have been receiving $13,000 for every admitted COVID patient. There have been financial extras for every COVID test, for every positive outcome. If patients were treated with the only prescribed drug, remdesivir, the hospital received yet another bonus: 20% of the entire hospital bill of the patient. Then for every patient put on a ventilator, the hospital received $39,000. And if that patient officially died of COVID nineteen, they got yet another $13,000. That’s a lot of money. According to attorney Thomas Renz and CMS whistleblowers, the hospitals receive approximately $100,000 per COVID casualty if the above protocol was followed. Now the thing is, the American hospitals received this money in advance based on the COVID predictions, based on the flawed models of people like Brooks. If the hospitals didn’t actually meet those models, they had to pay that money back at a later stage. And we’re talking millions of dollars here. So what happened? Everybody who was admitted to a hospital, for instance because of a car accident or because of cancer or diabetes or kidney failure, everybody got a PCR test to start with. Due to the ridiculous amount of cycles, there was an abundance of false positives. False positives equals positives equals COVID patients equals money. Hence, the sunrise in COVID patients. Then remdesivir left its detrimental mark just like midazolam had done in The UK. You see, remdesivir is not a new drug. It was used in 2018 during the West African Ebola outbreak. It was known to have severe adverse effects such as kidney damage, liver damage, and even death. Yet in 2020, Anthony Fauci directed that remdesivir was to be the drug hospitals used to treat COVID nineteen, hence the incentives. So what happened next? Those poor patients only got worse, after which they were put on a ventilator. After all, that was yet another bonus of many thousands of dollars pouring straight into the pockets of the hospitals. Now the problem with ventilators is that the patient is put into an induced coma. His or her breathing is taken over by a machine that puts extra pressure on the lungs called barrow pressure. In the case of damaged lungs due to for instance pneumonia, those lungs will only get worse. The chances of that patient recovering, of being able to be taken off the ventilator and to start breathing by himself are very, very small. Combined with organ failure as a result of remdesivir, the chances of that patient ever leaving the hospital alive are next to nothing.

Diagnoses of COVID-19 carried out with 78 different swabs, none of which were validated, assessed, or pre-authorized; their unreliability has been certified by the European Commission and the Istituto Superiore di Sanità. The complaint comes from Codacons and the Italian Association for the Rights of the Patient, filed with the prosecutors’ offices of Palermo, Catania, Siracusa, Ragusa, Caltanissetta, Enna, Agrigento, Trapani, and Messina. The request is to carry out appropriate investigations for crimes of aggravated fraud for obtaining public funding, caused alarm, ideological falsehood, and involuntary manslaughter. In a joint statement, a group of internationally renowned experts and researchers asserted that the results of the swabs are completely unreliable and that continuing to use swabs to derive data used to determine proclamations on the state of emergency, individual or group quarantines, and to impose restrictions and lockdowns—from schools to businesses and families—has almost no scientific basis. Specifically, Professor Stefano Scoglio, who coordinated and carried out the study, stated that COVID-19 swabs produce up to 95 to 100 percent false positives, as certified by the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, which, the note released by Codacons reads, means there is still no specific marker of the virus and therefore no standard that could render the swabs reliable. Beyond the high number of falsely positive swabs, the note also suggests a possible large hospital business being hidden. According to former head of the Civil Protection Guido Bertolaso, hospitals do not deprive themselves of COVID patients because of the high compensation provided for hospitalizations.

'the hospitalization and the death numbers were were almost a complete fiction because the government was paying hospitals to report that they had COVID hospitalizations and deaths.' 'The official number is one point two million, but secretary Kennedy's right.' 'If in order to be diagnosed with COVID, it was possible to have a prior test... and you entered the hospital for something else, and then you were still counted as a COVID case.' 'Most of the people who died from COVID had at least four comorbidities. That was according to CDC.' 'We paid hospitals tens of thousands of dollars per COVID patient.' 'COVID was obviously a deadly disease. It killed many people.'

At UZ in Ghent, they have taken a radical approach. Contrary to what some may think, the majority of patients in intensive care are now experiencing breakthrough infections, not unvaccinated individuals as before. The patients currently in intensive care at GZH have all been vaccinated.

In this video, a question is posed to Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx about concerns regarding the misreporting of deaths due to COVID-19. Dr. Birx explains that in the United States, the reporting of COVID-19 deaths has been straightforward and accurate. However, in some other countries, deaths caused by COVID-19 may be categorized as heart or kidney issues if the person had preexisting conditions. In the US, if someone dies with COVID-19, it is counted as a COVID-19 death. The questioner raises doubts about the accuracy of this reporting, but no further discussion is provided in the video.

America is counting all deaths with COVID-19 as COVID-19 deaths, not just those caused by the virus. Doctors claim they are incentivized to label patients as COVID-19 cases for financial gain, with $13,000 paid by Medicare for each COVID-19 hospital admission and $39,000 if the patient goes on a ventilator. This has led to concerns about misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment.

Vaccinated individuals are not less likely to get infected with COVID, but may have milder symptoms. Vaccines were introduced late in the pandemic, and data on vaccine status in hospitals may be inaccurate. Reports show a significant number of deaths following vaccination, raising concerns about vaccine safety globally. Calls have been made to remove these vaccines from the market due to their perceived dangers. Translation: Vaccinated people may still get COVID but might have less severe symptoms. Vaccine safety is being questioned due to reports of deaths following vaccination. There are concerns about the accuracy of hospital data on vaccine status.

Dr. Fauci and Dr. Brooks discuss concerns about the misreporting of deaths due to COVID-19. They mention that in the past, when testing was not widely available, some countries recorded deaths caused by the virus as heart or kidney issues instead of COVID-19. However, in the US, if someone dies with COVID-19, it is counted as a COVID-19 death. There are concerns raised by coroners about the accuracy of this reporting. The conversation ends with a question about whether this reporting method skews the data.

They changed how death certificates report COVID deaths by moving comorbidities to a less important section. Normally, the oldest condition is listed as the cause of death, even if COVID was contracted. This led to 96% of COVID death certificates listing an average of 4 comorbidities as contributing factors instead of the actual cause.

The PCR test, used to detect the presence of the SARS CoV-2 virus, has come under scrutiny for its reliability and potential for false positives. The test amplifies RNA fragments to identify the virus, but it can also detect traces of dead virus or remnants from other coronaviruses. Testing at high cycle thresholds can result in false positives, especially in populations with low COVID-19 prevalence. Scientists recommend not testing over 30 cycle thresholds to reduce false positives. Lowering the cycle thresholds has led to significant reductions in reported cases. The misuse and misinterpretation of the PCR test has contributed to inflated case numbers and unnecessary panic.