reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The CDC and NVSS changed death certificate reporting in violation of federal law. Two days later, the HHS increased reimbursement for hospitals and doctors who listed everything as COVID, making it the most lucrative diagnosis. There are reports of patients being starved and denied water, possibly to increase the use of Remdesivir. The range of fraudulent death certificates is estimated to be between 88.6% and 94.0%. Reimbursement for a diabetic patient labeled as COVID is 3 to 6 times higher. Hospitals had to go along with this to stay in business. Doctors who spoke up were threatened with license revocation and faced censorship. This is seen as collusion and murder for profit.

In 2020, only 2% of hospitalizations were related to Covid, with an average duration longer than other cases. Intensive care unit admissions were at 5%. This contradicts the perception that hospitals were overwhelmed with Covid patients. The numbers confirm that the fear and hysteria surrounding the virus were disproportionate. The consequences included increased suicides among young people and school closures. There may have been less harsh ways to handle the situation. It's unfortunate to say that the fear was exaggerated.

When someone dies with COVID-19, it's counted as a COVID-19 death, not just an infection. Doctors are being paid more for listing patients as COVID-19 cases, with $13,000 for a COVID-19 admission and $39,000 if the patient goes on a ventilator. Some believe this treatment approach is wrong and could harm many people.

Italy is described as being under total lockdown as coronavirus deaths continue to spike, with emergency rooms at or past breaking point. Authorities warn that Lombardy is running out of hospital beds and that morgue space has been exhausted, while army trucks transport bodies and new infections and deaths are reported daily. The president of the region asks for more military presence on the streets, with roadblocks and controls to limit movement without valid reasons. The transcript frames Italy as a new “ground zero,” noting almost twelve thousand five hundred cases at the time. A communications professor and former media and institutional figure, Alberto Contrini, is interviewed about why he believes Italy’s death toll rose. He says that fear propaganda included the use of large military trucks shown on TV carrying coffins, which he claims corresponded to one coffin per truck. He also claims that elderly people entering hospitals with other conditions were immediately declared COVID cases. Contrini attributes this to hospital reimbursement being reported as five times higher for COVID patients than for normal patients. He also alleges that incentives and payments led doctors to classify and treat patients in ways that increased COVID counts, including government payments per injection and “virologists” on television who he says were paid by pharmaceutical companies to promote a “massive propaganda.” He claims many doctors were suspended or marginalized for refusing these practices, and he describes legal actions by suspended doctors as ongoing. Contrini compares the Italian situation to the United States and says similar incentives and staging were used elsewhere, including treatment and reporting dynamics that he says manufactured death counts. He further suggests that, from his perspective as a media figure, the pattern of events implied opportunism evolving into something scripted before the outbreak reached Italy. He says other outbreaks were ignored by authorities despite doctors and scientists who believed they had effective approaches early. The transcript then shifts through multiple medical and investigative testimonies. Dr. Mariano Amici is described as having coordinated a study of over ten thousand patients who, he says, were all cured without a single death, treating COVID and other conditions successfully before protocols were imposed. He claims high death numbers were “made up,” images shown were not from COVID, and that the number of infected people was inflated by incorrect nose swab tests. He also claims incorrect treatments were used and that even patients who died from other causes were diagnosed as COVID to increase payment and change death rates. He says he found it “traumatizing” and that peers were pressured to comply with protocols and avoid losing their jobs. Rosanna Chiaverini Negri, described as a neurologist and holistic doctor, states she worked to write protocols to heal COVID patients and detoxify patients from “side effect” of what she calls an experimental genetic drug rather than a vaccine. She says she and others treated seventy thousand patients, with only ten hospitalized, and submitted medical records to Italian parliamentary bodies. She claims the media called the treatments witchcraft and that some doctors were suspended and had licenses removed. Raffaele Ragoli, an investigative journalist, says he went into a hospital on March 17 and saw conditions he describes as “hell.” He claims government policy required patients to stay home and take paracetamol, and that certain doctors used antibiotics against Ministry of Health guidance. He connects the narrative to mandatory vaccination policies and alleges that COVID was used to create fear and large-scale emergency measures that reduced rights. He also cites statements from WHO leadership about future pandemics and suggests biolabs and biological research are ongoing. He later asks whether the virus itself was actually responsible for the concentrated “explosion” seen in Bergamo and whether death patterns continued across Italy. Giovanni Trambusti, an electrical engineer focused on data processing and statistical analysis, describes downloading raw mortality data from ISTAT month by month to compare announced COVID numbers with real mortality. He claims mortality was highly concentrated in northern areas such as Bergamo and Brescia and “almost nothing” occurred elsewhere, and that the contagion did not move south even when people migrated south to avoid lockdown. He says he cannot explain the specific mechanism behind the northern concentration but insists that the numbers show an “explosion” in Bergamo. Dr. Pietro Gasparoni provides a hypothesis about the Bergamo surge. He describes alleged multiple meningitis cases in late 2019 and mass meningitis vaccination around January–February 2020, claiming that immune systems were low in the first two weeks after vaccination and made COVID infection spread more easily in that period. The transcript then emphasizes what it says are vaccine-related effects using mortality patterns. Trambusti is described as asserting that excess mortality in 2022 rose in regions where COVID deaths supposedly declined and suggests this indicates deaths were not from COVID. He claims a “fourteen-day trick” in death classification after vaccination, where deaths within fourteen days were categorized as if people were “unvaccinated,” producing a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” narrative while the vaccinated were allegedly misclassified. He also claims spikes in mortality by age group aligned with vaccine rollout. A cardiologist, Dr. Giuseppe Barbrow, is quoted about myocarditis and pericarditis beginning in early 2021 and affecting males particularly in ages twelve to thirty-six. He claims myocarditis is not “mild” and that myocarditis can persist and generate potentially fatal arrhythmias. The transcript claims a view that the increase was driven more by vaccination than natural infection. Finally, multiple vaccine injury accounts are included, describing paralysis, loss of mobility, myocarditis within hours or after doses, thrombosis, pericarditis, neurological symptoms, and inability to walk. The narrative repeatedly frames these injuries as resulting from the COVID vaccines and contrasts them with being told to comply with protocols and vaccination. The closing portion returns to calls for scientific debate and study replication in Italy, including a request for replication of the “Henry Ford study,” a randomized pragmatic study, and removal of mandatory obligations “vis a vis such evidence.” The transcript ends with the host thanking a team and those who enabled the trip and work producing the film and study.

In Germany, all individuals who are diagnosed with Covid-19 and subsequently pass away are counted as Covid-19 cases, regardless of whether they had underlying health conditions. The crucial factor is the positive Covid-19 test result. The distinction between cases with or without underlying conditions is determined later on. Therefore, all cases that test positive for Covid-19 and result in death are reported as Covid-19 fatalities.

In 2020, the ATIH collected and analyzed hospital data, revealing that only 2% of hospitalizations were due to Covid. These Covid-related hospitalizations lasted an average of ten days, with 5% in intensive care. Contrary to the perception of overwhelmed hospitals, the numbers show that the fear and hysteria surrounding the pandemic were disproportionate. The consequences of lockdowns, such as increased suicides among young people and school closures, could have been avoided with less drastic measures. It is important to acknowledge that the fear surrounding Covid was exaggerated.

The definition of people dying from COVID is simple. If someone is diagnosed with COVID at the time of their death, it is counted as a COVID death. This means that even if someone was already in hospice and given a few weeks to live, but also had COVID, it would be counted as a COVID death. Similarly, if someone died from a different cause but had COVID at the same time, it would still be listed as a COVID death. It's important to note that being listed as a COVID death doesn't necessarily mean it was the cause of death, but rather that the person had COVID at the time of death.

The PCR test, used to determine COVID-19 cases, amplifies RNA fragments to detect the virus. However, the high amplification can also detect traces of dead virus or remnants from other coronaviruses. Scientists recommend not testing over 30 cycle thresholds to avoid false positives. When labs reduced the cycles, case numbers significantly decreased. False positives can occur almost half the time, especially in populations with low COVID-19 prevalence. In the past, PCR tests have caused false epidemics. The test requires skilled technicians and careful handling, but it is currently being conducted on a large scale with hastily trained personnel. Therefore, it is important to question the accuracy of reported case numbers.

The stimulus bill intended to help hospitals overrun with COVID patients created an incentive to record something as COVID. Hospitals are in a bind because if a hospital is half full, it's hard to make ends meet. Checking a box can yield $8,000, and putting a patient on a ventilator for five minutes can bring $39,000. The alternative could be firing doctors. This situation presents a tough moral quandary.

The numbers of people who died of COVID are skewed because many unwell individuals were classified as suspected COVID without testing. Other health conditions seemed nonexistent during COVID, and care home residents who became unwell were automatically considered COVID positive. This caused frustration because the numbers don't accurately reflect COVID deaths. Deaths were classified as COVID positive, suspected COVID, or COVID-related, even with underlying health conditions. Scott Finnegan is Group General Manager for First and Lisa DiGiacomo is a director with Open Ministry Healthcare.

Many people who died with a COVID diagnosis were already in a fragile state, where even a minor infection could be fatal. However, it is questionable whether these infections should be considered the cause of death. For example, if we started registering every urinary tract infection that pushed a frail person over the edge, we would have an epidemic of urinary tract infections. The same kind of illogical attribution happened with COVID, where 3,000 expected deaths in hospices were attributed to the virus. This raises the question of what a death certificate should actually indicate: the specific cause of death on a particular day, or the overall cause of death within a certain timeframe.

The transcript describes Italy under “total lockdown” during the coronavirus outbreak, with emergency rooms at or past breaking point and authorities warning of hospital bed shortages and morgue overflow, including reports of army trucks removing bodies and new infections and deaths reported daily. It asserts Italy had the highest death toll anywhere in the world at that time, attributing the situation to a significant elderly population and an overstressed health system. It then shifts to claims about how COVID deaths were reported. The transcript says ninety-nine percent of those who died from the virus had other illness, and that only twelve percent of death certificates showed direct causality from coronavirus while eighty-eight percent involved at least one pre-morbidity, often multiple. It also frames “excess death” as deaths above or below an average baseline. The transcript further claims Italy’s high death toll was influenced by age structure, the health system’s strain, and reporting practices. A series of interviews follows. The host interviews Alberto Contrini, described as a professor of communications and a former institutional media figure involved in discussions about propaganda during COVID. Contrini says Italy launched a “massive fear campaign,” referencing Bergamo and military trucks reportedly conveying coffins, but Contrini says each truck held one coffin. He also claims elderly patients entering hospitals with other pathologies were immediately declared COVID, attributing this to financial incentives: the transcript says hospitals received refunds five times higher for COVID patients than normal patients, encouraging diagnoses to be coded as COVID even when multiple conditions existed. Contrini also links the transcript’s claims to similar patterns described for the United States and says virologists on TV were paid by pharmaceutical companies to promote “massive propaganda.” He claims many doctors were financially incentivized (citing government payments per injection) and says dissenters were marginalized, including suspended doctors and ongoing legal actions. The transcript highlights a moment where Contrini describes asking Dr. Bassetti about contracts with pharmaceutical companies and says Bassetti removed his earphones and left. The transcript then interviews Dr. Mariano Amici, described as a COVID treating doctor. Amici claims that in a study of over ten thousand patients, his group “cured” over ten thousand people with “not even once” a single death, treating not only COVID patients but also patients of other concerns. He says the “explosion” of deaths was “made up,” describing alleged use of non-COVID images on national TV, claims about inaccurate nose swab tests, and assertions that people were misclassified as dying of COVID when they died from other causes such as car accidents. Amici claims he was “traumatized” by the situation and says protocols prevented doctors from treating patients, calling the protocol a “death protocol.” The transcript presents him as saying some doctors had successful early treatment approaches using steroids and antibiotics and later had those tools taken away. Next, the transcript interviews Rosanna Chiaverini Negri, a neurologist who describes herself as working to write protocols and detoxify side effects from a COVID “Name it vaccine” that she characterizes as an experimental genetic drug. She claims that early use of antibodies from healed people and heat is curative within “three days,” and says they treated “seventy thousand” patients with only “ten” hospitalized, bringing documentation to Italy’s Parliament and Senate. She says press coverage attacked the work and that some practitioners were suspended and had licenses removed. Raffaele Ragoli, described as an investigative journalist, says he went into a hospital on March 17 and saw what he characterizes as “hell,” including a policy to “stay home, wait, and just take paracetamol,” and guidance that he says discouraged standard treatments. The transcript says Ragoli attributes the perceived need for a declared pandemic to the WHO, including a claim that the WHO needed thousands of deaths to declare a pandemic and that there was a lack of cure. Ragoli says Italy was chosen as a front runner for a mandatory vaccination program, and he claims WHO strategy is influenced by organizations “on top” of governments and by entities including “Bill Gates” and major financial institutions. He also claims Tedros Ghebreyesus stated that the next pandemic would come, not if. Giovanni Trambusti, described as an electrical engineer specializing in data processing and statistical analysis, says he downloaded raw mortality data from ISTAT and compared it month by month to what was announced in media and government. He claims deaths were highly concentrated in northern areas (especially Bergamo and Brescia) and “almost nothing” in other parts of Italy. He attributes the lack of spread south to an alleged migration from north to south ahead of lockdowns, and says he sees “the numbers aren’t adding up.” The transcript then includes Dr. Pietro Gasparoni, described as treating vaccine injury. Gasparoni claims a mechanism involving immune suppression after “mass vaccination of meningitis combined with the flu vaccine” following meningitis cases in November 2019, leading to an immune-system low period and then a “COVID explosion” during January–February 2020. He references reported meningitis cases and quotes emergency responses described in the transcript around Sarnico and surrounding municipalities. The transcript also describes myocarditis and pericarditis claims through a cardiology interview with Dr. Giuseppe Barbuto, saying myocarditis first appeared in early 2021 and that 12–36-year-olds (especially males) were higher risk. The transcript states a claim that myocarditis was exclusively found in vaccinated people and cites other studies as supporting that vaccines, rather than natural infection, caused the increase. It says “mild myocarditis” is false and that myocarditis can last for years. Finally, it features multiple “vaccine injured” testimonials, including Amelia Padovano and others, describing severe post-vaccination symptoms and disability, including facial paralysis, paralysis and inability to walk, myocarditis/pericarditis, thrombosis, neurological problems, and related losses. The transcript ends with additional claims about pressured suppression of debate and the desire for scientific replication and closed-door discussions, including calls to remove vaccine mandates and conduct a randomized pragmatist study.

Hospital deaths from COVID-19 are seen as a failure, as hospitals are meant to save lives. Surprisingly, there were very few deaths at home from COVID-19, raising questions about what went wrong in hospitals that led to so many deaths there.

Hospitals are receiving bonus payments for COVID cases, leading to high mortality rates and lack of transparency for families. The CARES Act incentivizes hospitals with payments for COVID tests, diagnoses, admissions, remdesivir use, ventilator use, and even COVID-related deaths on death certificates. This system is seen as the Biden administration paying hospitals to harm patients, with estimated payments of $100,000 per patient. The situation is dire and needs to be addressed urgently.

We ended our previous episode with our COVID pyramid, build layer upon layer of lies, deceit, fraud, scandals. Now, by now you’re wondering how so many hospitals, doctors, and health care workers went along with all of the above. We have reached the capstone of our nauseating COVID pyramid. Pyramid. We shall name the capstone M and M, money and murder in hospitals. Shocking as it may sound, we’ve seen it before. Remember the unjust administering the killer drug midazolam in The UK as shown in part 19? Well, The US and many other countries had their own version called remdesivir. Here’s what happened. Hospitals were given incentives, as in money, for each and every COVID casualty. According to whistleblowers, investigative journalists, lawyers, and specialists, Hospitals in The US have been receiving $13,000 for every admitted COVID patient. There have been financial extras for every COVID test, for every positive outcome. If patients were treated with the only prescribed drug, remdesivir, the hospital received yet another bonus: 20% of the entire hospital bill of the patient. Then for every patient put on a ventilator, the hospital received $39,000. And if that patient officially died of COVID nineteen, they got yet another $13,000. That’s a lot of money. According to attorney Thomas Renz and CMS whistleblowers, the hospitals receive approximately $100,000 per COVID casualty if the above protocol was followed. Now the thing is, the American hospitals received this money in advance based on the COVID predictions, based on the flawed models of people like Brooks. If the hospitals didn’t actually meet those models, they had to pay that money back at a later stage. And we’re talking millions of dollars here. So what happened? Everybody who was admitted to a hospital, for instance because of a car accident or because of cancer or diabetes or kidney failure, everybody got a PCR test to start with. Due to the ridiculous amount of cycles, there was an abundance of false positives. False positives equals positives equals COVID patients equals money. Hence, the sunrise in COVID patients. Then remdesivir left its detrimental mark just like midazolam had done in The UK. You see, remdesivir is not a new drug. It was used in 2018 during the West African Ebola outbreak. It was known to have severe adverse effects such as kidney damage, liver damage, and even death. Yet in 2020, Anthony Fauci directed that remdesivir was to be the drug hospitals used to treat COVID nineteen, hence the incentives. So what happened next? Those poor patients only got worse, after which they were put on a ventilator. After all, that was yet another bonus of many thousands of dollars pouring straight into the pockets of the hospitals. Now the problem with ventilators is that the patient is put into an induced coma. His or her breathing is taken over by a machine that puts extra pressure on the lungs called barrow pressure. In the case of damaged lungs due to for instance pneumonia, those lungs will only get worse. The chances of that patient recovering, of being able to be taken off the ventilator and to start breathing by himself are very, very small. Combined with organ failure as a result of remdesivir, the chances of that patient ever leaving the hospital alive are next to nothing.

Diagnoses of COVID-19 carried out with 78 different swabs, none of which were validated, assessed, or pre-authorized; their unreliability has been certified by the European Commission and the Istituto Superiore di Sanità. The complaint comes from Codacons and the Italian Association for the Rights of the Patient, filed with the prosecutors’ offices of Palermo, Catania, Siracusa, Ragusa, Caltanissetta, Enna, Agrigento, Trapani, and Messina. The request is to carry out appropriate investigations for crimes of aggravated fraud for obtaining public funding, caused alarm, ideological falsehood, and involuntary manslaughter. In a joint statement, a group of internationally renowned experts and researchers asserted that the results of the swabs are completely unreliable and that continuing to use swabs to derive data used to determine proclamations on the state of emergency, individual or group quarantines, and to impose restrictions and lockdowns—from schools to businesses and families—has almost no scientific basis. Specifically, Professor Stefano Scoglio, who coordinated and carried out the study, stated that COVID-19 swabs produce up to 95 to 100 percent false positives, as certified by the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, which, the note released by Codacons reads, means there is still no specific marker of the virus and therefore no standard that could render the swabs reliable. Beyond the high number of falsely positive swabs, the note also suggests a possible large hospital business being hidden. According to former head of the Civil Protection Guido Bertolaso, hospitals do not deprive themselves of COVID patients because of the high compensation provided for hospitalizations.

'the hospitalization and the death numbers were were almost a complete fiction because the government was paying hospitals to report that they had COVID hospitalizations and deaths.' 'The official number is one point two million, but secretary Kennedy's right.' 'If in order to be diagnosed with COVID, it was possible to have a prior test... and you entered the hospital for something else, and then you were still counted as a COVID case.' 'Most of the people who died from COVID had at least four comorbidities. That was according to CDC.' 'We paid hospitals tens of thousands of dollars per COVID patient.' 'COVID was obviously a deadly disease. It killed many people.'

At UZ in Ghent, they have taken a radical approach. Contrary to what some may think, the majority of patients in intensive care are now experiencing breakthrough infections, not unvaccinated individuals as before. The patients currently in intensive care at GZH have all been vaccinated.

In this video, a question is posed to Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx about concerns regarding the misreporting of deaths due to COVID-19. Dr. Birx explains that in the United States, the reporting of COVID-19 deaths has been straightforward and accurate. However, in some other countries, deaths caused by COVID-19 may be categorized as heart or kidney issues if the person had preexisting conditions. In the US, if someone dies with COVID-19, it is counted as a COVID-19 death. The questioner raises doubts about the accuracy of this reporting, but no further discussion is provided in the video.

America is counting all deaths with COVID-19 as COVID-19 deaths, not just those caused by the virus. Doctors claim they are incentivized to label patients as COVID-19 cases for financial gain, with $13,000 paid by Medicare for each COVID-19 hospital admission and $39,000 if the patient goes on a ventilator. This has led to concerns about misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment.

Vaccinated individuals are not less likely to get infected with COVID, but may have milder symptoms. Vaccines were introduced late in the pandemic, and data on vaccine status in hospitals may be inaccurate. Reports show a significant number of deaths following vaccination, raising concerns about vaccine safety globally. Calls have been made to remove these vaccines from the market due to their perceived dangers. Translation: Vaccinated people may still get COVID but might have less severe symptoms. Vaccine safety is being questioned due to reports of deaths following vaccination. There are concerns about the accuracy of hospital data on vaccine status.

Dr. Fauci and Dr. Brooks discuss concerns about the misreporting of deaths due to COVID-19. They mention that in the past, when testing was not widely available, some countries recorded deaths caused by the virus as heart or kidney issues instead of COVID-19. However, in the US, if someone dies with COVID-19, it is counted as a COVID-19 death. There are concerns raised by coroners about the accuracy of this reporting. The conversation ends with a question about whether this reporting method skews the data.

They changed how death certificates report COVID deaths by moving comorbidities to a less important section. Normally, the oldest condition is listed as the cause of death, even if COVID was contracted. This led to 96% of COVID death certificates listing an average of 4 comorbidities as contributing factors instead of the actual cause.

The PCR test, used to detect the presence of the SARS CoV-2 virus, has come under scrutiny for its reliability and potential for false positives. The test amplifies RNA fragments to identify the virus, but it can also detect traces of dead virus or remnants from other coronaviruses. Testing at high cycle thresholds can result in false positives, especially in populations with low COVID-19 prevalence. Scientists recommend not testing over 30 cycle thresholds to reduce false positives. Lowering the cycle thresholds has led to significant reductions in reported cases. The misuse and misinterpretation of the PCR test has contributed to inflated case numbers and unnecessary panic.