TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

During the Covid crisis, there were questions about the need for a parliamentary inquiry into the side effects of the Covid vaccine. The speaker believes in transparency and states that the scientific community is transparent. Patients who have been vaccinated are monitored, and there have been no significant alerts among the 19 million vaccinated individuals. Some women have reported menstrual issues, but these cases are not significant compared to the overall number of vaccinated people. The Covid vaccine has been widely used worldwide and has a lot of experience behind it.

Wir hatten in Deutschland im Jahr 2020 historisch niedrige Krankenhausbelegungen und keine außergewöhnlichen Atemwegserkrankungen. Die Sterblichkeit stieg erst 2021 an. Schweden schnitt ohne Masken und Lockdowns besser ab. Die Politik reagierte mit übertriebenen Maßnahmen, isolierte Alte und verursachte Existenzschäden. Gerichte und Medien versagten bei der Überprüfung. Es gab eine Kriminalisierung von Kritikern und eine Verharmlosung von Impfschäden. Es werden Fragen zur Regierungshandlung während der Pandemie gestellt. Bestseller reflektieren die Stimmung. Ein Untersuchungsausschuss wurde abgelehnt, daher ist Aufklärung wichtig. Translation: We had historically low hospital occupancy rates in Germany in 2020 and no extraordinary respiratory diseases. Mortality only increased in 2021. Sweden performed better without masks and lockdowns. The government responded with exaggerated measures, isolating the elderly and causing economic damage. Courts and media failed to review. There was a criminalization of critics and a downplaying of vaccine injuries. Questions are being raised about government action during the pandemic. Bestsellers reflect the mood. An inquiry was rejected, so clarification is important.

Speaker 0 accuses 'you and the other leaders of your death cult, particularly as it relates to COVID case rates tied to severity of lockdowns,' and says there has not yet been 'a corresponding something remotely resembling a mea culpa' or accountability. Speaker 1 notes that 'people's lives are still affected,' including 'Kids whose schooling has been delayed for years, that may be permanent, where they're having long term effects, psychological harm, depression, drug abuse,' and adds that 'Sweden... did better than we did by far. They had actually almost no excess mortality through the entire pandemic. It's incredible. The best in Europe. And they didn't do the lockdowns.' He urges planning for the next time that is 'more human' and maintaining 'lots and lots of tools' to understand and counter new viruses, while warning that 'What we don't have is a social structure that responds to that information in a rational way' and that societies are 'prone to panic' and may 'sacrifice children, the poor, the working class,' so pandemic plans must be structured to not ever do that again.

The speaker argues that public health authorities deserve credit for the large decline in measles deaths in America that occurred before the first measles vaccine was introduced. They reference data they say is available on the CDC website, noting that between 1900 and 1960–1962 the mortality rate for measles declined by over 98 percent, a trend that existed before the vaccine's introduction in 1963. The speaker stresses that this decline was not caused by the vaccine, since there was no measles vaccine in the early period. They propose several public health factors as contributors to the decline, including nutrition and sanitation, clean water, sewage management, and basic living conditions such as ensuring natural light in tenement buildings. They also highlight quarantine practices and the practice of advising sick individuals to stay at home and rest, even if not the kind of enforced stay-at-home measures discussed in other contexts. The speaker notes that, in the years immediately before vaccination, roughly 400 Americans died per year from measles, averaging about one death per 500,000 people, illustrating that mortality was still a real concern even as the downward trajectory was already underway. The speaker acknowledges that measles can still be lethal in certain contexts and that there were pockets of the United States in the early 1960s that resembled conditions in less developed parts of the world. They emphasize that the declining mortality rate continued after the vaccine was introduced in 1963, describing the trajectory as ongoing and implying that vaccine influence is not the sole or definitive cause of the earlier decline. When addressing contemporary public health messaging, the speaker notes that public health authorities today often claim that measles caused the decline and that the measles vaccine caused the decline in mortality, but they allegedly do not discuss the other public health efforts that contributed. The underlying point is that attribution of the decline is contested, and the role of broad public health measures should be acknowledged alongside vaccination. The speaker repeatedly stresses that the data cited are uncontroversial and data-driven, and that the discussion centers on attribution and emphasis rather than disputing the data itself.

The speakers express concern about the limited reporting of adverse reactions to vaccines. They highlight a report suggesting that only 5% of adverse reactions are recorded in the database. Despite this, they emphasize the safety of the COVID vaccine and assure viewers that it is safe. They also compare the number of adverse event reports for all vaccines in New Zealand, which is typically around 1500 a year, with the low number of deaths reported following vaccination.

Wir hatten historisch niedrige Klinikbelegungen in Deutschland 2020, weniger schwere Atemwegserkrankungen, und die Sterblichkeit stieg erst 2021. Schweden schnitt besser ab als Deutschland laut WHO. Die Pandemie basierte auf Massentests mit schwankenden Ergebnissen. Politik reagierte mit Lockdowns, Schulschließungen, und isolierte Alte. Kritiker wurden kriminalisiert, Medien folgten dem PCR-Narrativ. Es gab keine Gefahr, aber die Politik schürte Angst. Warum die Kehrtwende zu Massnahmen? Warum Zwangsimpfungen? Bestseller reflektieren die Stimmung. Ein Untersuchungsausschuss wäre angemessen gewesen. Vielen Dank. Translation: We had historically low hospital occupancy rates in Germany in 2020, fewer severe respiratory illnesses, and mortality only increased in 2021. Sweden performed better than Germany according to the WHO. The pandemic was based on mass testing with fluctuating results. Politics responded with lockdowns, school closures, and isolating the elderly. Critics were criminalized, media followed the PCR narrative. There was no danger, but politics fueled fear. Why the turnaround to measures? Why forced vaccinations? Bestsellers reflect the mood. An investigative committee would have been appropriate. Thank you very much.

During a discussion, the speaker expresses surprise that there is a lack of information on vaccinated hospitalizations, ICU visits, and deaths at a national level. The other speaker agrees, acknowledging the challenges in data collection and the importance of providing complete information to the public. The first speaker then mentions the extensive paperwork they have to fill out for patients but notes that data on vaccinated patients and the effectiveness of hospitalizations, ICUs, and deaths was not collected. The second speaker clarifies that while they were looking at that information for vaccine effectiveness studies, they did not receive aggregated data on vaccination and hospitalizations. They emphasize the need for accurate data reporting.

When discussing the issue of vaccination, the speakers express frustration and blame towards the unvaccinated. They argue that the unvaccinated are causing harm and should be shamed. Some suggest mandatory vaccination and higher healthcare costs for the unvaccinated. The speakers emphasize the importance of vaccination for the greater good and criticize those who spread misinformation. They also highlight the impact of COVID-19 on hospitals and the preventable deaths caused by the unvaccinated. Overall, the speakers call for accountability and urge everyone to prioritize public health.

Speaker 0 questions the idea that Doctor Fauci is involved in a plot to kill millions, seeking clarity on the claim. Speaker 1 says they are reasonable and that Fauci is not an innocent bystander; he is aware of what he’s doing, but the extent of involvement is not known to them. Speaker 2 cites the Center for Countering Digital Hate, stating Dirashad Bhattar is one of the top spreaders of COVID disinformation, once with more than a million followers. Bhattar allegedly claimed “More people are dying from the COVID vaccine than from COVID,” and that “the Red Cross won’t accept blood from people who have had the COVID nineteen vaccine.” He posted that “most who took COVID vaccines will be dead by 2025,” and promoted the overarching conspiracy that COVID was a planned operation as part of a secret global plot to depopulate the earth. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 2 believes the pandemic was planned; Speaker 2 confirms there is a suspicion of a plan to reduce the population, though Speaker 1 says they have no idea. Speaker 2 criticizes Bhattar, saying it would be laughable if it weren’t so dangerous and that Qatar (Qatar’s commentary) compares COVID and the vaccine to World War II and Doctor Anthony Fauci to Adolf Hitler. Speaker 1 pushes back by asking to what extent Fauci would be equated with Hitler. Speaker 3 asserts that lies cost lives in a pandemic, and that encouraging people not to vaccinate will cause people to lose their lives. Speaker 2 describes Qatar as encouraging distrust of life-saving vaccines and using false, twisted information and unproven conspiracies to do so. Speaker 0 asks if the COVID vaccine works. Speaker 1 states the vaccine is very effective at what it was designed for, but “it’s not preventing death. Certainly not.” Speaker 2 contradicts, claiming that Bhattar believes life-saving vaccines are more dangerous than the virus itself, and Speaker 1 asks why the vaccine would cause more deaths than the problem itself, noting 6,340,000,000 doses administered. Speaker 0 requests the completion of a sentence about what each vaccine is geared up for, but Speaker 1 says he’s not a vaccine developer and mentions “Scientific corruption.” Speaker 2 notes Qatar has been removed from Facebook and Instagram due to disinformation but remains on Twitter, Telegram, and his own site, filled with falsehoods. Speaker 0 recalls a September 5 retweet of a doctored AstraZeneca packaging photo suggesting the vaccine was made in 2018; Speaker 1 says the photo was perhaps fake, and questions why Speaker 0 would challenge the agencies that have caused deaths. Speaker 0 argues it’s reasonable to question agencies, noting Speaker 1 had 1,200,000 followers who received false information; Speaker 1 admits if a tweet with a doctor’s photo was sent in error, it was a mistake, and he cannot make mistakes on the numbers. Speaker 2 notes vaccine studies showing vaccines remain ninety percent effective in preventing hospitalization and death, while Qatar claims the vaccine is the danger. Speaker 1 counters that thousands are dying and the delta variant is “vaccine injured,” citing CDC data, which Speaker 0 disputes as not true. Speaker 1 asserts he does not want to be part of a mass genocide and suggests this era will be remembered as a worst time in history, even worse than World War II. Speaker 0 concludes by calling Speaker 1 crazy. Speaker 2 ends with a reference to North Carolina’s Board of Medicine reprimanding someone prior to COVID.

A Green Party politician from Brandenburg loses her temper in an online chat, launching into a tirade of insults against other participants. Despite the visible effects of the pandemic, such as depression, loneliness, learning setbacks, and suspected vaccine side effects, Barbara Domke, a prominent advocate for pandemic restrictions, responds to criticism with offensive remarks. The CDU expresses its disapproval of her insulting behavior towards voters. It is particularly surprising coming from the Greens, who often position themselves as moral authorities. Domke not only uses offensive language but also questions the negative consequences of COVID-19 measures. Virologists emphasize the importance of considering the pandemic's effects. However, Domke seems to disregard studies showing that 75% of children and adolescents still suffer from mental health issues due to the pandemic. Domke claims her statement about flooding others with studies was satire. She has since stepped down as a city councilor in Cottbus.

Some people love the vaccines, while others hate them. The speaker acknowledges that vaccines have saved lives, but also mentions concerns about their safety. Reports vary on the effectiveness and problems with the vaccines, but the speaker claims to have saved 100 million lives. They argue that those who get very sick and go to the hospital are usually the ones who haven't taken the vaccine. The mainstream media is accused of stifling information about adverse reactions. The speaker believes the vaccines have saved millions of lives but criticizes the media for pausing the Johnson and Johnson vaccine over a small number of cases.

In Deutschland gab es im Jahr 2020 und 2021 weniger schwere Atemwegserkrankungen als üblich. Die Sterblichkeit stieg erst ab 2021 an. Schweden schnitt besser ab als Deutschland. Die Regierung reagierte mit Lockdowns und Zwangsmaßnahmen, während Kritiker kriminalisiert wurden. Es gab eine Kehrtwende in den Maßnahmen, obwohl keine besondere Gefahr bestand. Die Politik zwang die Bevölkerung zur Impfung mit experimentellen Impfstoffen. Es gibt Bestseller, die die Ereignisse kritisch beleuchten. Ein Untersuchungsausschuss wurde abgelehnt, daher ist es wichtig, dass wir zur Aufklärung beitragen. Translation: In Germany, there were fewer severe respiratory illnesses in 2020 and 2021 than usual. Mortality only increased from 2021 onwards. Sweden performed better than Germany. The government responded with lockdowns and mandatory measures, while critics were criminalized. There was a turnaround in the measures, despite no significant danger. The government forced the population to get vaccinated with experimental vaccines. There are bestsellers that critically examine the events. An investigative committee was rejected, so it is important that we contribute to clarification.

During COVID, I was on the board of my kids' school and initially supported a strict lockdown policy. However, I now realize that keeping kids out of school for longer had a greater negative impact than the risks. We all operated with imperfect information, including myself, the CDC, and the governor. Let's learn from this and hold each other accountable while showing grace and forgiveness. Unfortunately, about 1 in 5 US adults are unwilling to get vaccinated, making them the global runner-up in vaccine hesitancy. This means roughly 56 million Americans are 11 times more likely to die from COVID than the rest of the population. It's embarrassing that some Americans are playing Russian roulette with their lives and the lives of others. Despite this, America's healthcare response to COVID has been a victory, thanks to the vaccines.

The speaker expresses skepticism about the number of COVID patients in hospitals and claims that most patients are vaccinated. They urge the media to tell the truth and ask for support. Another speaker, identified as a nurse, asks if they are seeing the same people in the hospital. The first speaker responds by mentioning serious adverse effects, specifically myocarditis in 20-year-olds, which can lead to cardiac transplants. They highlight the low organ donor rate in Australia. The conversation ends with a request for clarification.

Wir hatten in Deutschland im Jahr 2020 historisch niedrige Klinikbelegungen, weniger schwere Atemwegserkrankungen und keine erhöhte Sterblichkeit. Schweden schnitt besser ab als Deutschland laut WHO. Die Regierung reagierte mit harten Maßnahmen, während Gerichte, Medien und Wissenschaft versagten. Es gab Kriminalisierung von Maßnahmenkritikern, fehlende Prüfung der Verhältnismäßigkeit der Maßnahmen und Panikmache. Es werden Fragen zur Regierungshandlung in der Pandemie gestellt, wie die Verabreichung experimenteller Impfstoffe und das Fehlen eines Untersuchungsausschusses. Bestseller-Bücher reflektieren die Stimmung der Bevölkerung. Anklagen gegen die Regierung werden erhoben. Translation: We had historically low hospital admissions, fewer severe respiratory illnesses, and no increased mortality in Germany in 2020. Sweden performed better than Germany according to the WHO. The government responded with harsh measures, while courts, media, and science failed. There was criminalization of critics of the measures, lack of examination of the proportionality of the measures, and fear-mongering. Questions are being raised about government actions during the pandemic, such as the administration of experimental vaccines and the absence of a parliamentary inquiry. Bestselling books reflect the mood of the population. Charges against the government are being made.

The speaker argues that the reported cases are not actual cases, but rather positive tests. They claim that the measurement of cases can be manipulated and that the current focus on unvaccinated individuals will inflate the number of cases. They also state that the Omicron variant is mild and does not overwhelm hospitals, resulting in a low number of deaths. The speaker expresses skepticism towards the information being presented.

The speaker praises the doctor for being a reliable source of information during the pandemic. They mention that the doctor discussed the origins of the virus, the effectiveness of vaccines and masks, and always provided objective and science-based information. The speaker then brings up a conspiracy theory about the doctor getting someone kicked off Twitter for questioning the COVID vaccine. The doctor chooses not to comment directly on the accusation and expresses concerns about social media platforms not being able to police threats made against individuals. The speaker clarifies that their own experience with COVID and vaccines has been positive. The doctor reiterates their concern about threats being made against people's safety on social media platforms.

There is a discussion about how public trust in vaccination has changed since the pandemic. The speaker notes that years ago there were “five people in the world who were prepared to talk about the thorny issue of vaccination.” Post COVID, however, “half the adult population of the world are now saying, hold on, we don't trust you. You lied to us. It's not what you told us, safe and effective.” This skepticism extends to vaccines given to children, with the question, “Does this apply to all the other vaccines you're putting into my kids?” The speaker then asserts that “safety studies haven't been done,” suggesting that important research behind vaccines is incomplete or lacking. This leads to the claim that “they've created this mess for themselves.” Despite the frustration, the speaker emphasizes the moral weight of deception, stating, “it's really tough to lie. I mean, lying gets you into real trouble.”

Speaker 0 expresses clear personal hesitation about vaccines, stating that they are not jabbed and would not touch the experimental mRNA and gene therapy experiments, asserting there is a lot of concern about these technologies from many medical people. They reference political figures and media narratives, saying Kennedy in the United States will expose much of this material and that Donald Trump is keen to see it as well. Speaker 0 then recalls personal health concerns related to vaccination, mentioning friends who have experienced myocarditis, blood clots, strokes, and other problems after receiving the COVID jab, and emphasizes the idea of long-term effects being unknown. Speaker 1 counters by saying they still believe in vaccinations, but notes that no one on that side would discuss possible problems with vaccines, and they themselves got vaccinated multiple times and are now open to the idea that there might have been problems. They acknowledge the complexity of the issue and state they do not object to vaccines inherently. Speaker 0 clarifies their stance further, stating they are not a medical expert but their instinct was not to have the vaccine, and they acknowledge how difficult it was to avoid it since the state appeared to force people to receive it. Speaker 1 adds that their own vaccination status includes having been vaxxed several times, and they feel okay today, though they recognize the complexity of the situation and that long-term effects are uncertain. Speaker 0 then discusses the notion that the state and public health authorities pressured people to vaccinate, naming the NHS, Matt Hancock, and portraying the messaging as a duty to vaccinate “because you might kill granny,” mentioning Trudeau and the World Economic Forum Brigade as part of the broader narrative. Speaker 0 proposes an alternative approach: those who are vulnerable should isolate themselves. They reference Anders Tegnell’s approach in Sweden, which did not impose lockdowns. They claim Sweden’s economy hardly missed a heartbeat, in contrast to “ours,” and argue that the pandemic greatly disrupted young people’s lives and education, with knock-on effects described as huge. Speaker 0 concludes that those who made the lockdown decisions are not ready to admit they got it wrong, for a host of reasons.

The speakers express concern that only a small percentage of adverse reactions to vaccines are reported. Despite this, they assure viewers that the COVID vaccine is safe. They highlight that prior to the COVID vaccine rollout, an average of 1500 adverse event reports were received each year for all vaccines in New Zealand, resulting in one or fewer reported deaths annually.

There was a lack of transparency about vaccine side effects, leading to underreporting. Mandating vaccines was a mistake; personal choice should have been allowed since they don't prevent infection and have side effects. Translation: Lack of transparency and underreporting of side effects, along with mandating vaccines, were mistakes. Personal choice should have been allowed due to the vaccines not preventing infection and having side effects.

The speaker questions the source of the claim that 20 million lives have been saved. They ask for data and studies to support this number. The response is indirect and the meeting is about to end when the speaker jumps back in to clarify that the 20 million lives saved refers to all vaccines, not just mRNA vaccines. The speaker is unable to ask for further clarification. They find it suspicious that this number is being thrown around without proper explanation. They suggest that these numbers are made up.

Speaker 0 assures that reported side effects of the vaccine are expected and not concerning. They urge people to report any unusual reactions. Speaker 1 emphasizes the importance of transparency and unbiased investigation into outbreaks following vaccination. They question the accuracy of recording underlying causes of death related to COVID-19. Speaker 0 dismisses these concerns, stating that spreading doubts about vaccine safety during a pandemic is dangerous and undermines public health. Speaker 1 finds the minister's response concerning and ends the conversation.

The speakers express concern about the limited reporting of adverse reactions to vaccines. They mention a report suggesting that only 5% of adverse reactions are recorded in the database. Despite this, they assure viewers that the COVID vaccine is safe. They highlight that prior to the COVID vaccine rollout, the average number of adverse event reports for all vaccines in New Zealand was 1500 per year, with one or fewer deaths reported annually.

On COVID, there's a perception that credit isn't given where it's due. While the vaccines were developed quickly, they don't prevent infection or transmission and may have serious side effects. In hindsight, would anything be done differently? Studies on the vaccines are ongoing, and results will emerge over time. It's important to note that Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women, but reports indicated that over half of the 458 pregnant women who received the vaccine experienced adverse events. The ongoing studies will help clarify these concerns.