reSee.it - Related Video Feed

After the 2016 election, Democrats claimed there was a problem with vote machines, but after the 2020 election, they said there was no problem. In previous elections, Democrats challenged results too. In 2001, Maxine Waters challenged George W. Bush's victory, and in 2005, Barbara Boxer challenged Ohio's electoral vote. In 2017, after Trump's win, Sheila Jackson Lee mentioned voting machine malfunctions. These objections were seen as naive or shameless, as they could disenfranchise Americans. Stacey Abrams, a Democrat who ran for governor of Georgia, claimed the game was rigged against voters. The claims of fraudulent votes, malfunctioning machines, and rigged elections are similar to what is being claimed now. Some defend the Dominion voting machines, while others acknowledge vulnerabilities to foreign interference.

Comms will continue to fuel the fire. We need everyone's support, regardless of political affiliation. Democrats had a 20,000 vote advantage in Dade County, but there were some irregularities in Milwaukee. There are valuable lessons to be learned from this campaign.

Do you believe votes were manipulated electronically in favor of Joe Biden? Yes, I do. I saw reports of votes switching from Trump to Biden—around 12,000 and 20,000 votes in two instances, with Trump's numbers decreasing exactly as Biden's increased. I suspected something was wrong, especially with claims of intelligence involvement. The Dominion Company, a Canadian firm, stored its records in Germany and Spain, raising concerns about foreign interference. It seems there may have been CIA involvement, as U.S. forces seized servers in Germany, which were linked to CIA operations. Now, those servers are with the FBI, which makes me uneasy, but at least they are in American hands.

Voting machines have been proven to be vulnerable to tampering and hacking. In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted or switched votes. The biggest seller of voting machines even violated cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making them attractive to fraudsters and hackers. Three companies control the majority of voting machines in the US. Antiquated machines in many states are particularly vulnerable. Demonstrations have shown how easily these machines can be hacked, with workers switching votes. Approximately 43% of American voters use machines with serious security flaws. Aging systems rely on unsupported software, making them even more susceptible to cyberattacks. A hack in just one swing state or a few counties could significantly impact a close presidential election.

The outcome of elections is often influenced by the mechanics of the election process and access to communication channels. Republicans face challenges in getting their message across as they have limited media outlets compared to Democrats. This affects their ability to win elections. Democrats have more control over the election machinery and the American media, giving them an advantage. It's not about ideology, but about who holds power. Republicans need to address these issues by investing in communication channels and advocating for fair election rules. The recent election in Pennsylvania highlighted the impact of early voting, with a majority of Democrats voting early compared to Republicans. These problems can be fixed, but first, they need to be acknowledged.

A report discusses the possibility that a firm owned by Venezuela could take over one of the United States’ top voting machine companies, sparking concerns that American democracy could be affected by Venezuelan interests. The report notes that Hugo Chávez’s Venezuela moved to the left and critics claim the deal puts democracy “for sale.” In Chicago, about 19,000 electronic voting machines were used in the city and Cook County’s primary on March 21, and the US company that makes the machines, Sequoia, had been bought in 2005 by Smartmatic, a private company primarily owned by Venezuelan businessmen. When Chicago encountered problems with the machines, a dozen Venezuelan employees were on hand to assist. Chicago officials expressed anger, with one stating that American elections ought to be run by American companies and American citizens, not Venezuelan nationals. Smartmatic is technically based in Boca Raton, Florida, but its president, Jack Blaine, testified to the Chicago City Council. Fewer than a dozen Smartmatic employees work in Florida; the majority are based in Venezuela. Watchdog groups question why US voting machines would be under the control of citizens of another country, particularly a country whose own election process is described as highly suspect. They view it as a national security issue, arguing that companies owned by non-US entities should not have access to US elections. The Treasury Department is expected to monitor sales of US companies to overseas investors where national security is a concern, such as in the Dubai ports deal. Some in Congress are demanding an investigation. Speaker 2 notes several unanswered questions about Smartmatic, including offshore ownership and murkiness, and says someone should know who owns it. They believe the government should know. There is concern about a potential risk to the democratic process. A request was made to the Secretary of the Treasury to review the ownership of Smartmatic/Sequoia; Treasury acknowledged awareness of the sale but could not confirm whether it had been reviewed. Some in Congress and voter watchdog groups urged a clearer explanation than what had been provided. There is criticism of the Treasury Department as allegedly incompetent, with claims that they have halted more than 1,500 reviews while not confirming whether the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States reviewed this voting-machine sale. The speakers express frustration at the lack of a clear answer, calling for action from officials, including possibly John Snow, and promising to continue pursuing the matter. Representatives and media figure Kitty are credited with advancing the inquiry and expressing appreciation for the congresswoman’s efforts, while urging White House involvement to provide an answer by Monday evening.

The speaker discusses election fraud in Chicago, explaining that there are three levels of fraud: precinct level, mid level, and the highest level involving the Chicago Board of Election. They believe that corrupt individuals can manipulate the central tabulator, which is not connected to the internet, by running algorithms. The speaker mentions a lawsuit filed in 2016 that resulted in three key individuals leaving their positions at the Chicago Board of Elections. They recount a recount experience that they believe was fraudulent, with votes being manipulated in favor of Hillary Clinton. Overall, the speaker expresses their belief in the existence of a fraudulent scheme in Chicago elections.

I just saw a voting setup where you don’t go inside; you stay in your car while they bring the voting machine to you and push the buttons for you. There were only Democrats working there, which raises concerns about the integrity of the election process. I’ve never witnessed anything like this before. It makes me question how trustworthy the elections are, especially if they claim Kamala Harris won South Carolina. Something significant is happening in America, and we need to pay attention before it’s too late.

The integrity of democracy hinges on who counts the votes, not just who casts them. Voter fraud has a deep-rooted history in American politics, often linked to organized efforts by political machines. This includes instances of ballot manipulation, coercion, and systemic issues with absentee voting. Historical examples highlight how elections can be influenced through intimidation and fraud, leading to outcomes that undermine the will of the people. Recent elections have seen similar patterns, with allegations of irregularities and questionable practices surrounding mail-in ballots and voter registration. The system is vulnerable, and without proper oversight, the potential for fraud persists, raising concerns about the true nature of democracy in America. Ultimately, the narrative suggests that the electoral process is susceptible to manipulation, calling for reforms to ensure fair and transparent elections. The integrity of democracy hinges on who counts the votes, not just who casts them. Voter fraud has a deep-rooted history in American politics, often linked to organized efforts by political machines. This includes instances of ballot manipulation, coercion, and systemic issues with absentee voting. Historical examples highlight how elections can be influenced through intimidation and fraud, leading to outcomes that undermine the will of the people. Recent elections have seen similar patterns, with allegations of irregularities and questionable practices surrounding mail-in ballots and voter registration. The system is vulnerable, and without proper oversight, the potential for fraud persists, raising concerns about the true nature of democracy in America. Ultimately, the narrative suggests that the electoral process is susceptible to manipulation, calling for reforms to ensure fair and transparent elections.

We've been trying to elect good candidates in local elections but keep losing by narrow margins. After a recent election, we suspected cheating, especially after hearing claims about fraud in Detroit. While checking the voting list for a recall, I found friends who had been registered to vote without their knowledge, despite never voting. This pattern continued when I looked into my own voting history after moving to Ohio, where I was also registered back in Detroit without consent. I discovered many others in similar situations, including someone who had never voted but was used in multiple elections. We obtained a massive list of voters from the clerk's office to investigate further.

Speaker 0 asks for reassurance that the upcoming election won't be rigged or stolen. Speaker 1 responds by mentioning that having Democrats in charge of the voting machines in Ohio is helpful. However, they also acknowledge that both Republicans and Democrats have manipulated elections in the past. Speaker 1 explains that those in power tend to try to tilt things in their favor.

I witnessed multiple instances where a person was inserting USBs into the voting machines without being observed. I reported this to the deputy sheriff and the Clerk of Elections. I personally saw it happen over 24 times, and there are other witnesses, including Democrat poll watchers. I was told that a few USBs are usually left in the machines after each election, but I later found out that this was not true. 47 USB cards are now missing. When I demanded to see the live vote count, it showed an increase of 50,000 votes for Vice President Biden. As an American and a patriot, I find it shocking that this could happen.

Four years ago, there were concerns about uncounted votes in Illinois. A computing error in Franklin County gave extra votes to George Bush. This raises questions about the accuracy and integrity of our election system, not just in Ohio but also in other states. It is important to address these issues to maintain the legitimacy of our elections, especially when promoting democracy in other countries. The objection is raised in Ohio, but similar situations have occurred in Michigan and Arizona. This debate should continue to shed light on the irregularities observed. The golden rule of politics, treating others as you would like to be treated, should guide our actions regardless of the election outcome.

If an election is close, Commonwealth will win by cheating, fortifying, and stealing ballots. Elections are not perfectly clean, but changes were done in plain daylight. To improve elections, run them like other Western democracies: one-day voting, practically no absentee ballots, and stronger voter ID. This used to be more common in the U.S., but has decayed over the last 20-30 years. Results were available on election day 30-40 years ago, which no longer happens.

Democrats have long criticized the vulnerability of voting machines and the potential for hacking. They argue that all voting machines need to be examined to ensure they are secure. They specifically mention Dominion voting machines as being susceptible to hacking. They claim that these machines can be easily hacked and that the results of elections have been questioned for a long time. They also highlight the issue of outdated and vulnerable machines in some states. However, they are accused of only raising these concerns when they lose elections. Republicans have also challenged election results in the past. The overall message is that there are doubts about the integrity of elections and the influence of powerful interests.

I just saw a voting setup where you don't go inside; you pull up in your car, and they bring the voting machine to you. They push the buttons for you, and I noticed there were only Democrats working there. This raises serious concerns about the integrity of our elections. I can't trust the process after witnessing this. It feels strange to have someone else handling the voting while you sit in your car. Something significant is happening in America, and we need to pay attention before it's too late. If they announce Kamala Harris won South Carolina, I can understand how that happened.

Four years ago, there were concerns about uncounted votes in Illinois. A computing error in Franklin County gave extra votes to George Bush. This raises questions about the accuracy and integrity of our election system, not just in Ohio but also in other states. It is important to address these issues to maintain the legitimacy of our elections, especially when promoting democracy in other countries. The objection is raised in Ohio, but similar situations have occurred in Michigan and Arizona. This debate should continue to shed light on the irregularities observed. The golden rule of politics, treating others as you would like to be treated, should guide our actions regardless of the election outcome.

There is evidence of thousands of ballots being moved between states at night to manipulate voting machines and commit fraud, as President Trump received an overwhelming number of votes. This disrupted the algorithm designed to reduce Trump's votes and increase Biden's. Evidence of this manipulation has been found in multiple counties and states across the country. Anyone willing to examine the facts can see the truth of what occurred. More information is available on our website at defendingtherepublic.org.

All votes in The United States Of America are counted in The United States Of America. There is no evidence that any machine has been manipulated by a foreign power. Recounts are consistent with the initial count, confirming that the systems used in the twenty twenty election performed as expected. The American people should have 100% confidence in their vote. A lawyer representing the president claimed that Dominion voting machines ran an algorithm to take votes from President Trump and flip them to President Biden. Votes in Georgia were cast on paper, counted by a machine, and recounted by hand, with consistent outcomes. If there was an algorithm flipping votes, it didn't work. The more likely explanation is that there was no algorithm and that security controls protected the systems from misbehavior.

Speaker 0 welcomes George Soros, emphasizing the need for active participation in America's future. Speaker 1 acknowledges that both Republicans and Democrats have manipulated elections in the past, highlighting the tendency of those in power to tilt things in their favor. Speaker 0 adds that voter fraud organizations have been extensive and inclusive in American politics.

Votes in Michigan were miscounted due to software errors, favoring Democrats over Republicans. This affected 47 counties using the same software. Antrim County had to manually count all ballots. Other counties should review their results for discrepancies. Michigan residents deserve transparency in the election process.

Google's influence on elections is a concern for many. The speaker, who leans left politically, is troubled by the fact that a private company like Google can undermine democracy without any restrictions. They give an example of how Democrats in Florida received reminders to vote on Google's homepage, while conservatives did not. They believe this is a blatant display of power. The speaker also suggests that Trump beat the cheat in both the 2016 and 2020 elections, highlighting the small margin of victory in key swing states. They claim that if Google's influence is factored out, Trump would have won 11 out of 13 swing states in 2020.

Up to 13 states' Board of Elections voter registration roles are coded with secret algorithms that allow for hidden, unreal votes. This coding system is like a national security coding system. In Ohio, there is a mathematical formula embedded within the state board of election voter role that permits someone within the board of election to vote as many mail-in votes as they want to rig and steal an election without it being known. The speaker is in Ohio demanding a proof of concept.

Four years ago, there were concerns about uncounted votes in Illinois. The senator from New York commended the senator from California for raising objections and allowing the discussion of these issues. A computing error in Franklin County awarded extra votes to George Bush, raising questions about the accuracy and integrity of the election system. These issues were not limited to Ohio, as other states also faced similar situations. The legitimacy of our elections is being challenged, which is concerning given our efforts to promote democracy worldwide. The objection raised in Ohio is just one example of the irregularities observed. The debate will continue thanks to the objection from California. The golden rule in politics is emphasized, regardless of the election outcome.

In Ohio, having Democrats in charge of the machines is beneficial. However, it's important to be honest about the fact that both Republicans and Democrats have manipulated elections in the past. When people are in power, they tend to try to sway things in their favor.