reSee.it - Related Video Feed

"There's this new landlord group." "It's called Pied Piper Realty." "They go by PPG." "They're a group of investors who've bought over $9,000,000 worth of rental property in this town that I live in." "Because of them, some families are seeing their rent go up by even 50%." "So three bedrooms that were costing $650 a month are now $1,300 a month in rent." "This town's population, the town I live in, is less than 23,000 people." "These are not just numbers, this is people actually losing their homes." "I went to my city council meeting last night." "People are literally living in fear of being evicted." "Rather that's petitioning our local government officials to change it from a thirty day notice to a sixty or ninety day notice or enforcing inspections for any property that's rent is increasing by more than 10%."

The speaker discusses the symbolic significance of the increase in property tax in relation to Emmanuel Macron's political philosophy. Macron aims for a society where no one owns anything, as seen through his previous actions of abolishing the wealth tax and replacing it with a real estate tax. This ideology attacks citizens' ability to establish roots and make independent financial decisions. The speaker also highlights the contradiction between the government's claim of improving purchasing power during a period of inflation and the increase in taxation. Various taxes and levies, such as those on highways, airports, airfare, eco-contributions, non-road diesel, alcohol, and more, will burden the already struggling French population.

BlackRock has purchased £1,400,000,000 worth of UK homes, and Lloyds Bank aims to own 50,000 homes by 1930. Massive institutions are buying up UK homes, potentially leading to a society where homeownership is unattainable and people are forced to rent. The next fifteen to twenty years may represent the last opportunity to buy a home. Renters will not be able to negotiate with massive US private equity firms, where they are just a line item. Multinationals are buying up all of the homes in the UK.

Speaker stresses that the property tax situation is very important because it pinches many homeowners, especially seniors with paid-off homes purchased decades ago, who are now told their homes are worth much more and must pay increasingly higher taxes. This feels like paying rent to the government to enjoy their property, which is wrong, and the speaker says we need to do something about it.

Governments have an ESG agenda and use money to control the population. Public opinion is also a tool for control. Money is essential for navigating society, so limiting spending can influence behavior. For example, only 10% of wages can be used for petrol or buying meat. These measures are presented as beneficial for society.

The 15-minute city initiative by c40 cities will ban petrol and diesel cars, control food intake, and freeze bank accounts for non-compliance. The WEF and WBF are pushing this agenda globally, with London's mayor as the chair. This plan is concerning as it restricts freedom and could lead to a lifetime of limitations. It's a hidden agenda that needs more public awareness.

We are heading towards a future where freedom is at risk. By 2030, Britain may restrict travel and eliminate private transportation, requiring digital IDs and electronic money for all transactions. This level of control has been building for decades, and we must resist now to prevent becoming slaves to a cashless society.

When all else fails, they take you to war, and the climate hoax is an effective tool. In the name of saving the planet, they will take food, cars, gas boilers, and air travel. Land seized from farmers will be used for wind turbines and solar panels, which won't provide reliable energy, potentially leading to a new dark age. The production of turbines and panels uses oil, gas, and coal, requiring the mining of rare earth metals and minerals, destroying habitats and ecosystems. Mining for lithium, cobalt, cadmium, copper, and lead may increase by 2,000%. While coal mines are shut, other mines are opening to obtain materials for batteries. Child slaves give their lives for cobalt used in electric batteries. When turbines and solar panels reach the end of their lives, they can't be recycled and are buried in landfill sites, leaking lead, cadmium, and other toxins into the soil and water supply. This is driven by greed, benefiting the few and denying the many, after years of brainwashing people into thinking the Earth is about to catch fire.

The Dutch farmer protests are not anti-environmental, but a response to oppressive agricultural practices by companies like Monsanto and Bill Gates. Farmers use fertilizers due to financial pressure, not by choice. The Great Reset exploits green agendas to bankrupt farmers and seize their land. Support for farmers should come from the community, not globalist bodies, to make sustainable transitions together.

The government will soon send letters requiring homeowners to make costly improvements to their houses, while landlords will increase rent due to rising costs. This is a result of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, which aims to have all privately owned houses at energy class D by 2033 and zero emission homes by 2050. The estimated cost per house is around €100,000, making it unaffordable for many. This could lead to forced selling and a shift towards renting, eroding middle-class home ownership. It may also result in big companies seizing properties, creating a feudalistic system. This is seen as a control tactic rather than an environmental initiative, and disobedience is urged to protect ownership rights.

The EU is working on a draft law that could lead to the expropriation of older residential buildings that don't meet energy efficiency standards. By 2030, these buildings may no longer be used, meaning owners can't live in them or rent them out. This follows the logic of German economics minister Robert Hebeck, who believes certain industries may stop producing instead of going bankrupt. Landlords who own multiple apartment buildings but can't afford to renovate them energetically will no longer be allowed to rent them out, resulting in a loss of rental income and worthless real estate. This could lead to foreclosure and financial ruin. The state can easily forbid property use, leaving owners with no choice but to comply. Many owners of older buildings can't afford the necessary renovations, which can cost thousands of dollars. Energetic renovations are also seen as a scam. The speaker, who used to specialize in affordable housing, has sold all their properties and plans to start anew in a country with fewer climate initiatives. The prospects look bleak unless one starts a business focused on energy-efficient renovations.

The C40 consortium, made up of 40 major cities, aims for citizens to only have 3 articles of clothing, 95% reduction in private car ownership, and limited flights. This could greatly impact industries and living standards. Some believe this green agenda may sacrifice the working class and poor for environmental goals.

The corporate elites met at the World Economic Forum in Davos to plan the future via a scheme called the great reset, which will drain bank accounts and strip the middle class of its equity. During COVID, the WEF dictated lockdowns that shifted $4 trillion to an oligarchy of corporate billionaires. Bankers and investment houses acquired homes, advertising that you will owe nothing and be happy. The speaker, an attorney who has fought corporate interests, claims familiarity with their impulses to commoditize lands, waters, homes, children, workers, and public health. The speaker says they have proven they can derail these schemes. Despite billions spent on propaganda to make people feel powerless, the speaker believes in the power of the people.

The transcript discusses the United Nations Habitat I Plan from the 1976 Vancouver Convention, which it says relocates people from farms and rural “wild lands” to cities or human settlements. The goal, it claims, is to concentrate populations in specific zones to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage, so people stay in their homes and may work there, minimizing car use, energy consumption, and water use. It asserts that the UN, being opposed to property rights, will first phase out single-family homes, pushing We the People into apartments and condos in mega cities near railroad tracks. The envisioned living would involve high-rise, “stack and pack” dwelling units built to UN-specified building codes, with guidance from Ickley, COGS, the ADA, and various NGOs aligned with sustainable development. The narrative contrasts this with “animals” roaming continental corridors, while humans live in transit villages and smart cities. Smart growth or new urbanism is described as ideology that questions the need for excess space, suggesting that a two-person couple in a three-bedroom house doesn’t need that extra space. The speakers claim there is a coordinated effort to make private transportation and home ownership as miserable as possible, portraying it as the duty of individuals to exist as global citizens with minimal private life. The plan is depicted as featuring high-rise, stacked living with smart meters and smart heating, enabling energy use to be tightly controlled. If energy use is high, “the energy police,” aided by neighbors and street surveillance, will intervene. A speaker emphasizes that concentrating people in a thousand-person buildings makes monitoring their behavior, location, and thoughts easier than in rural or suburban settings, with smart meters measuring all life activities via smart appliances. Water usage is targeted, with statements that those maintaining gardens or single-family homes—consuming more than a minimal daily water allowance—are unsustainable and should be removed from single-family residences. A participant argues that people with a couple of acres and their own water supply who can grow their own food are a threat to a collectivist society, implying that they will not rely on politicians for basic needs. The transcript ties these ideas to Agenda 21, claiming the plan aims to remove people from the country so corporations can grow all food, while simultaneously denying private living. It concludes by describing human settlements and food sheds as modern-day concentration camps, suggesting that with no cars or parking, all will walk and bike, becoming fit and healthy only insofar as the GM foods they are compelled to eat allow.

The speaker argues that five years ago the WEF claimed we would own nothing by 2030, tied to the UN Agenda 2030, with digital ID as a key component. They question how ownership has shifted toward non-ownership in that period. They point to homeownership: ownership in homes has remained flat over the last five years while rent has skyrocketed, with a claimed increase of 5,600,000.0. As a result, homeownership is expected to decline, and younger generations, particularly Gen Z, are described as priced out and the largest generation ever to be renting. The speaker claims many goods and services are moving to subscription models. They note that vehicles are adopting subscription features from brands like Toyota, Mercedes, and BMW, and that farming equipment from John Deere can be shut down if a subscription service is not maintained, with mechanics needed to fix issues tied to that service. Printer ink subscriptions are cited with HP, asserting that canceling the ink subscription would cause the printer to stop functioning. They argue that media, movies, and music have moved to streaming services, and ownership is eroded because items are stored in cloud rather than in the user’s possession. CDs and DVDs are gone, and gaming systems can be shut down if the user’s behavior is not acceptable. Software previously owned, such as Adobe Creative Suite, Quicken, and Microsoft Office, is now offered on a subscription basis, so users no longer own the software but pay to use it regularly. Ebooks are also hosted on Kindle, with a specific claim that in 2009 Amazon removed George Orwell’s books from some users’ digital libraries. The speaker asserts that such controls illustrate how digital content can be removed. They argue that digital ID would enable even broader control, allowing authorities to shut users down or deny access to services. The speaker emphasizes that incremental steps are leading toward owning nothing and paying regularly for access to services that were once purchased outright. They claim social media platforms can suspend users for things they disapprove of, reinforcing the potential reach of this agenda. The overall conclusion presented is that this is the direction of Agenda 2030 and how ownership is being eroded.

Housing prices and interest rates have doubled, making homes unaffordable due to large companies like BlackRock buying up properties. Nearly 30% of new home purchases are by investors, not individuals. This shift from ownership to renting erodes community ties and turns citizens into subjects. Homeownership fosters community involvement and care for neighbors, police, firefighters, and teachers.

The speaker, along with former senators, reveals that the Albanese Labor government has changed property titles from freehold to leasehold, effectively taking ownership of homes. They provide evidence of this language change and urge Albanese to address the issue publicly. The speaker emphasizes that this is not a conspiracy theory, but a real situation where people's properties have been stolen by the government. They call for accountability and action.

In 2023, private equity firms, specifically BlackRock, accounted for 44% of single-family home purchases. This trend is impacting people's ability to buy homes, as BlackRock aims to create a world where ownership is impossible. They want to control what you can purchase by putting everything on debt. This means you may not own a home, a car, or even the clothes you wear. Their goal is to destroy permanence and the family structure, aiming to atomize and dehumanize individuals for easier control.

A woman named Tiffany shared a video about private equity firms buying up single family homes. In 2023, these firms purchased 44% of all single family homes in America, potentially leading to them owning 60% by 2030. This trend threatens the middle class's ability to own homes, with future generations likely to rent from a few companies. Without reform, private equity firms could soon own the majority of single family homes in the country, posing a significant problem for all Americans.

Real estate prices in France are causing concern, with interest rates reaching 5%, the highest in 15 years. This means that households have lost around €100,000 in borrowing capacity over the past two and a half years. Additionally, energy efficiency is now a factor in obtaining a mortgage, with banks requiring more personal contribution for poorly insulated properties. For investors, banks may no longer consider rental income for highly energy inefficient properties, making it difficult to secure a loan. While high interest rates are expected to eventually lower prices, there is currently a divide between expensive cities experiencing price corrections and coastal areas where prices continue to rise. Overall, the real estate market is expected to face significant challenges in the near future.

I've examined the C40 consortium agenda, which includes major global cities pushing for extreme measures. They propose limiting citizens to three articles of clothing per year, drastically reducing private car ownership by 95%, and allowing only one short-haul flight every three years. This would severely impact the travel and tourism industries, particularly in Europe. The overarching aim seems to be an 85% reduction in Western living standards, deemed necessary for a sustainable planet by certain globalist groups. This agenda appears to prioritize bureaucratic ambitions and radical leftist goals, potentially sacrificing the working class and the poor in the process.

The UN's 30 by 30 agenda aims to seize 30% of all land and water on Earth, disregarding private property rights. The European Union is implementing it, and California and Joe Biden are using similar language, mentioning conserving 30% of lands and waters by 2030. The speaker claims this isn't about conservation but about taking, facilitated in the US by the sustains act, which allows the government to receive private funds for conservation programs. This act assigns value to environmental services provided by privately owned land, such as pollination, photosynthesis, and clean air/water, monetizing them through partnerships between private investors and the government, without landowner consent. The speaker asserts this is a seizing of American assets aligned with the UN's goals, without public consent or input. Representatives, according to the World Economic Forum, are now solely responsible, without needing to consult the public.

The financial system is seen as the main problem, with finance meant to enslave through debt like mortgages. Even if you buy a house, the bank technically owns it. This system benefits a small group controlling everything with money.

As of January 1st, property owners in Mexico City must declare information about residential properties exceeding a certain value to the Finance Secretariat. This includes occupancy status, who lives there, and rental agreements. This new measure is seen as a violation of privacy and property rights, as it compels citizens to share private family matters with the authorities. It is also viewed as a targeted attack on the middle class, as it only affects properties above a specific value and excludes commercial, industrial, and agricultural lands. There are concerns that the government intends to misuse the collected data to increase property taxes, create new taxes, or even confiscate vacant properties. Similar policies were implemented in authoritarian regimes like Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Cuba, Venezuela, and Bolivia.

Speaker 0 argues that COPPA and related policy proposals wrongly take individual rights away from homeowners. He says the idea that a homeowner must consult with the building department and provide a six-month period for another party to make an offer is outrageous and constitutes government overreach, which he describes as 100% true. He states that this is “absolutely maniacal” and questions how this body operates when it comes to individual citizens, calling the measure overreach at its best. He identifies as a homeowner and asserts that no one will tell him or others who have worked hard to own a three- or four-family home that they must submit the ability to sell their house first to the building department and then offer it to a nonprofit, especially when a neighbor across the street may want to buy it and they must wait six months. He further adds that it is ridiculous and that everyone in the room should be terribly embarrassed for stripping veterans bills today from today's hearings. He asks why the men and women of the country deserve better treatment and asserts that the city has failed to come through for veterans, stating that the veterans bills were stripped totally off the record for today. He ends by calling the situation absolutely ridiculous and expresses shame: “Shame. Shame on all of you.”