TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I've been following Candace Owens' investigation into a wild conspiracy about the French president. Owens claims President Macron is married to a trans woman who is actually his father. After a year of research, Owens points to three pieces of evidence. First, there are no records of Macron's wife, Brigitte, ever existing as a young woman. No birth certificate, and her school years don't add up. Second, Owens found an old article about Macron's father disappearing in the seventies, and resurfacing looking different. Family photos show a resemblance between Macron's father after he returned and Macron's current wife, Brigitte. The theory suggests Macron's father transitioned into Brigitte, then married his own son. Macron's team is allegedly trying to suppress the story.

A European state leader asked the speaker to stop talking about COVID vaccines, but the speaker refused. The speaker then questioned why the leader was paid $12 million a year by Vanguard, despite having no knowledge or involvement in medicine. The speaker suggested that Vanguard and Pfizer pay the leader to promote their drugs, mentioning that Vanguard is an investor in China's Sinopharm.

The text has been adopted, but the suspense lies in whether there is a majority without the votes of the National Rally. It shouldn't even be a question. Emmanuel Macron's narrative shouldn't necessarily be ours. We don't have to accept it. But if there is a majority with the National Rally's votes, we start again. It's significant. Do we realize what we're talking about? Our job is also to highlight the gravity of this arithmetic. There is no democracy in the world where the results are read without considering all the votes. If that's how it is, I'll go to Brussels and request an Article 7 procedure for violation of the rule of law against France. Let's imagine for a moment that we are here, talking in these terms, in Hungary. Translation: The text has been adopted, but the suspense lies in whether there is a majority without the votes of the National Rally. It shouldn't even be a question. Emmanuel Macron's narrative shouldn't necessarily be ours. We don't have to accept it. But if there is a majority with the National Rally's votes, we start again. It's significant. Do we realize what we're talking about? Our job is also to highlight the gravity of this arithmetic. There is no democracy in the world where the results are read without considering all the votes. If that's how it is, I'll go to Brussels and request an Article 7 procedure for violation of the rule of law against France. Let's imagine for a moment that we are here, talking in these terms, in Hungary.

The speaker shares their experience with the Johnson vaccine, stating that they had four surgeries since January of this year. They mention being vaccinated because they were a deputy and didn't want to give the impression of not doing their job. They were unaware that President Macron and many government officials were not vaccinated. The speaker wanted to set an example but advised against copying them. They mention other world leaders getting vaccinated and state that they did it because they are somewhat known and wanted people to see how they were doing. They mention that they mentioned getting sick during the election campaign but no one listened. The speaker experienced severe side effects and almost died. They question the campaigns to push people to get vaccinated, especially with vaccines that are not well understood.

The speaker shows childhood photos and discusses the theory that Brigitte Macron lived as a man for 30 years. They argue that it would be easy for her to debunk the theory by showing photos of her early years. The speaker claims that the French press is involved in covering up the alleged truth. They argue that if the theory is true, it would have significant implications for France and suggest that an investigation should be conducted. The speaker also discusses the lack of evidence for Brigitte Macron's ex-husband and presents a theory that Jean-Michel Trogneux, who became Brigitte Macron, had children with his niece. They criticize the media for not addressing the allegations and claim that journalists are planning to reveal more about the situation.

Speaker 0: Are we going to buy masks or not? Speaker 1: Wearing masks is useless for the general population. Speaker 2: Masks are only useful when you are sick. Speaker 3: Don't wear masks or gloves. Speaker 4: I have banned the sale of masks. Speaker 1: Don't rush to buy masks, it's pointless. Speaker 0: I don't know how to use a mask. Speaker 3: Masks are useless for the public. Speaker 4: There is no shortage of masks. Speaker 2: We have millions of masks in stock. Speaker 0: There is no shortage, we have them. Speaker 2: Stop lying to the French. Speaker 4: I don't think I'm lying. Speaker 0: I don't lie, it's nonsense.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they got the vaccination and if they are okay. Speaker 1 confirms they got vaccinated and that it worked. Speaker 0 then mentions trusted sources and compares it to finding out about the moon landing or aliens. Speaker 1 responds by saying that Speaker 0's statement is idiotic and lacks rational thought. Speaker 1 concludes by saying that nobody in the room gained anything from listening to it.

The conversation centers on controversial claims about political figures and their spouses, and how these claims intersect with media coverage and political strategy. - The speakers discuss Candace Owens’ allegations about “Macron’s wife,” presenting a complex and sensational backstory: Macron reportedly has a wife who was younger and whom he met when she was a teacher, with contradictory accounts about her gender history (initially claimed to be a man who transitioned, then said to be his father who transitioned and returned). They describe a 25-year age difference and ongoing public appearances in which Macron’s wife is said to speed him up in public, with video footage cited of her at events, described as a man by the speakers. - They note that, despite the sensational backstory, Candace has made specific legal moves, including warnings about lawsuits and the involvement of expert gynecologists and witnesses regarding where she was at certain times. Candace, according to the speakers, proposed a simple DNA test: a cheek swab that would settle the matter quickly, suggesting NDA or DNA arrangements, and claiming if she’s wrong she would admit it. The counterpart pushes for a public clinic, a rapid and definitive test, and questions the motives behind the other side’s requests for extensive testimony. - The dialogue touches on the broader credibility and motivations of those involved. One speaker mentions meeting Candace recently and describes her as highly intelligent and aligned on many beliefs, while noting that high-level US intelligence reportedly confirms there is a French operation connected to Macron. There is reference to “a French operation” and “Macron head out on her,” with speculation about whether information is purposeful misinformation or suppression. - They discuss media figures and sources, including Gannon, Paul Watson, and Charlie Kirk, with a stance that while the claims are damaging to Trump overall, they still seek truth and acknowledge that some information appears to be being covered up. They acknowledge distrust and the sense that “something’s being covered up,” but stop short of making definitive judgments about truthfulness. - The discussion expands to broader political consequences. They contrast the alleged French operation and internal controversies with Donald Trump’s situation regarding Epstein, noting that Trump’s handling of related disclosures has been criticized, though the participants affirm that Trump is not implicated in Epstein per the victims’ statements. They highlight a tension between pursuing controversial narratives and maintaining focus on elections. - Toward the end, they discuss the potential strategic impact on public discourse and electoral politics, suggesting that real-time distractions from these allegations could influence public attention. They acknowledge that while the France-related allegations are “real” to some extent, the central political question remains: what is happening with elections and related geopolitical concerns, including mentions of Venezuela as a proximate political issue.

A lady in Canada recently held a press conference urging people to get vaccinated and wear masks. The speakers discuss their observations on the vaccine situation, including the loss of jobs for those who choose not to get vaccinated. They mention that the vaccine doesn't prevent transmission or guarantee protection from the virus. They also criticize the use of masks, stating that cloth and surgical masks are ineffective. The speakers express their disbelief and question the lack of scientific evidence supporting these measures. They speculate about the motives behind these decisions.

France is a country known for its scientific excellence and intellectual rigor. The speaker criticizes the influence of certain individuals, like Didier Raoult, who gained money and followers during the pandemic. They question whether Raoult's actions meet the criteria for sectarianism and express concern about the number of people who may refuse a protective vaccine due to false beliefs spread by such individuals. The speaker highlights the negative impact of the controversial use of hydroxychloroquine and emphasizes the need for lawmakers to protect vulnerable citizens and prevent future crises caused by self-proclaimed experts.

The speaker questions the lack of truthful reporting and the suppression of facts by the media. They urge journalists to fulfill their role by accurately reporting the facts provided by the Ministry of Health. They discuss the adverse effects of vaccines and the need for thorough investigation and transparency. The speaker criticizes the government for neglecting its responsibility to protect its citizens and calls for accountability. They emphasize the importance of journalists in stopping the vaccine campaign and demand evidence of the benefits outweighing the risks. The speaker highlights the need for independent verification and the responsibility of the media to guide the nation's future.

The video discusses a conspiracy theory surrounding Brigitte Macron, the wife of French President Emmanuel Macron. The theory suggests that Brigitte was born a man named Jean Michel and transitioned to become Brigitte at the age of 30. The video presents alleged evidence, including photos and inconsistencies in Brigitte's life story. It also mentions the legal actions taken by Brigitte against journalists who reported on the theory. The video suggests that the theory is being covered up by the media and raises questions about potential blackmail and control over the Macron couple. Protests in France demanding the truth about the situation are also mentioned.

Denis Agréche, a French doctor, shares an interview with the Minister of Health, Mr. Brande, conducted by Roger from Sud Radio. They discuss the need for transparency regarding the serious adverse effects of COVID vaccines. Mr. Brande claims there are no alerts or concerns, but Denis disagrees, citing the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety. He accuses Mr. Brande of lying and provides evidence of serious cases, such as myocarditis and hypertension, linked to the vaccines. Denis hopes that one day Mr. Brande will have to answer for his statements in court, comparing him to the disgraced politician Cahuzac.

The speaker questions the sincerity of governments claiming to have the people's interest at heart, stating that throughout history, political elites have never genuinely cared about the well-being of regular people. They advise not to trust any government blindly and always question their motives. The speaker expresses their refusal to be vaccinated with an untested drug, emphasizing the lack of scientific evidence regarding its benefits and long-term side effects. They assert that no one can grant them freedom, as they are already a free person. They challenge the European Commission and the German government, stating that they will not be coerced into getting vaccinated.

The speaker claims the media attacked them after they began reporting a story, leading to their firing. They cite the case of Isabella Ferrera, an independent journalist investigating Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte, who was found dead, with the media claiming suicide despite a friend's doubts. Another independent journalist, Natasha Ray, who has cancer, was sued by Brigitte Macron, not over the claim that Brigitte was born a biological male, but over errors when speaking to Amandin Roy, who was also sued for invasion of privacy. Xavier Poussard, the journalist who originally exposed the claim that Brigitte Macron was lying about her identity, has faced harassment, including financial audits and searches of his mother's home. Poussard has not been sued for defamation because his work has been thorough.

The speaker claims to have been targeted for assassination three times and suggests that the police are involved. They mention a friend named Xavier Merlin who was killed after the Bataclan attack and believed to have known important information. The speaker also mentions an individual named Merah who was intercepted by the Americans while training for jihad and then allowed to return to France. They accuse the French government of assassinating this person. The speaker claims to have written detailed accounts of their assassination attempts and brought them to the Russian embassy for safekeeping. They urge people to wake up and take action before it's too late.

Speaker 0 expresses shame in being German and accuses others of betraying the country. Speaker 1 argues that there is no such thing as a nation or knowledge, and therefore no betrayal of the nation. Speaker 2 asks Speaker 1 about their knowledge on a specific topic. Speaker 1 reiterates their support for mandatory vaccination. Speaker 2 reminds Speaker 1 of their promise of no mandatory vaccination. Speaker 1 defends their stance, stating that it is about public health and being truthful. Speaker 2 argues that being liberal often leads to political downfall. Speaker 1 clarifies that they support mandatory vaccination but believe it should be proportionate. Speaker 2 calls for mandatory vaccination in Germany. Speaker 1 assures that there will be no forced vaccination or violation of rights. They believe a solution will be found through a process that may lead to mandatory vaccination.

Speaker 0: Stop, Sandrine, stop. I am wrongly single. I have three children, raising them alone. Do you know why my husband died? Do you know when he died? In January, after the third dose, sudden cancer, gone in three days. Now my children are alone. They have no parents, no father especially, because they still have me. Okay, now in September, you're going to vaccinate our children, make them take this poison. Don't laugh, please, because that's the insolence you're showing. Okay, exactly. I am trembling, you can't imagine how much I hate you, Mr. Macron, when you were my husband, please, the father of my children. Because of a shitty third dose.

I came to meet Emmanuel Macron and talk about his lies. He lied about Covid, the war, and retirement. He has put the country in chaos. I got vaccinated because he said he was vaccinated, but now people, including lawmakers, are saying he isn't. I want to ask him if it's true. Mr. Macron, can you answer? He will probably say he will go through the process without empathy. I don't think he cares about the French people. There is a deputy in the National Assembly who says he isn't vaccinated, so we want to know the truth. Are you vaccinated or not? If you don't want to answer, the French people will judge.

The speaker warns against manipulating patients and emphasizes the importance of safe vaccines. They mention having written a book advocating for safe vaccines and criticize the government's stance on vaccination. The speaker shares a personal experience of being vaccinated and still contracting COVID-19, highlighting the need for revaccination. They accuse big pharmaceutical companies of manipulating the population and influencing politicians. The speaker refers to a book that challenges official COVID-19 statistics and argues that the increase in deaths is due to age rather than the disease itself. They also mention cases of medical abuse and negligence in hospitals. The speaker estimates around 160,000 deaths in France, attributing them to pre-existing conditions and lack of treatment.

The speaker presents a video clip from a German television show allegedly showing French President Emmanuel Macron and the German Foreign Minister concealing something on a table. The video appears to show Macron with a tissue and the Foreign Minister with a small spoon. The speaker questions what they are hiding, pointing out the actions of concealing the items in their hands. The speaker suggests the items are being removed from the table while the two are talking for the cameras. The speaker speculates about the nature of the hidden items and their potential connection to strained relations with Russia, ultimately suggesting Macron was simply littering a napkin.

Le ministre de la santé affirme que le vaccin Covid ne provoque pas la maladie de Krost-on-Jacob. Les parlementaires ont le droit de s'exprimer librement, mais doivent respecter les faits scientifiques. Une plainte est déposée contre le ministre de la santé pour ses propos.

I assure you that if I had any doubts, you would ask for a replacement. It is my duty and responsibility to have confidence in this vaccine and get vaccinated. I say this solemnly, otherwise there will be delays in vaccination, and the French people will be less protected, prolonging the health crisis.

The speaker questions whether the government was guessing or lying when they said that vaccinated individuals couldn't get the virus. The other speaker, who was part of the previous administration, acknowledges that there was evidence of natural reinfection during the global pandemic and that the vaccine was based on natural immunity. They suggest that the vaccine may not necessarily outperform natural infection. The first speaker then asks if the government was lying when they said the vaccine couldn't transmit the virus, to which the second speaker responds that it was more of a hopeful belief. The first speaker concludes that the government's statements were not truthful, leaving the options of guessing, lying, or hoping as possible explanations.

I want to announce an action I have decided to take against Jean Lassalle. As you may have seen in several videos, Lassalle claims to have evidence that the President and government members are not vaccinated. This is crucial for us, as victims' families. Macron locked down the country, encouraged vaccination, and suspended unvaccinated healthcare workers. He even expressed a desire to annoy the unvaccinated. That's why I have initiated legal action against Lassalle. Many bailiffs have refused to get involved due to fear. However, an official will be going soon. If Macron is found to be unvaccinated and lied to the French people, it would be an absolute scandal. I urge Lassalle to speak up because there are deaths, injuries, and a scandal surrounding Covid. It's concerning that some bailiffs refuse to visit Lassalle, which raises questions about the Covid situation. Thank you.