reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Stanislav Krapivnik, a former US army officer from Donbas, returns to discuss the escalation of NATO-Russia proxy warfare, the role of drones, and potential strategic escalations. The conversation centers on how Europe is contributing to deep strikes in Russia, especially against energy installations, and the resulting danger of a broader conflict. Key points and claims, as presented: - Drones and deep strikes: The EU, through its defense alignment, aims to overwhelm Russian air defenses and threaten strategic assets, including nuclear-capable targets, by using long-range drones. The objective is to degrade Russian defensive systems and the production rate of missiles, potentially opening the path to strikes on radars, early warning systems, strategic assets like bombers, and even nuclear submarines in port. - Nuclear war risk: The interviewee asserts that by mid-to-late summer there could be a zone of possible nuclear war if ground warfare arises or escalates due to Western actions. He notes that Russia’s anti-aircraft and early warning capabilities are limited to manageable scopes, with occasional corridors allowing strikes in, and that Europe’s current strategy could push the conflict toward a nuclear dimension. - Deterrence and first strikes: The discussion contrasts U.S. first-strike doctrine with other nations’ second-strike assurances. The speaker argues that in a blinded Russia, the logic for targeted first strikes becomes stronger for the other side, while lamenting that Europe’s leadership might be pushing toward a nuclear exchange. He cites studies suggesting that as few as 47 key targets could collapse the U.S. in a nuclear context, highlighting the fragility of a high-tech economy under nuclear disruption. - European psyche and policy: There is criticism of what the speaker describes as a mass psychosis in Europe, where warnings about striking Russia’s early radar or deterrent systems are dismissed in favor of defending Ukraine. The rhetoric suggests deep political and media reinforcement of pro-Ukraine narratives, with limited space for risk discussion about nuclear consequences. - Energy installations and economy: While drone strikes have targeted oil facilities, the speaker notes that most damage has been to storage facilities rather than critical infrastructure like pipelines or refineries. Refineries are large, and damage to some vessels can take longer to repair. Russia’s production has not been significantly reduced, but the attacks are accelerating a shift of energy facilities eastward toward Asia, while Europe faces higher oil prices on the spot market and potential disruptions to gas routes like TurkStream and Caspian Pipeline Authority, with broader economic impact on Southeastern Europe and Turkey. - Russia’s response and drone modernization: The Russian military has reorganized its drone capabilities, forming dedicated drone battalions and establishing new schools to standardize and professionalize drone operations. The move encompasses reconnaissance, kamikaze, bombing, and supply drones, with adjustments after initial disorganization. Ukrainians reportedly helped inspire and provide drone countermeasures, and Russia’s modernization integrates drones with air defenses. - Zelensky and Victory Day threat: The possibility of Zelensky threatening to strike Moscow’s Victory Day parade is discussed. The guest suggests Zelensky would want to be at the head of such a move, while acknowledging the uncertainty of who controls decisions in Kyiv and the level of Western involvement. The parade’s downscaled format is noted, but the broader question remains whether such a strike could occur. The guest asserts that Russian deterrence may have been eroded, and Western actors might not take credible deterrence seriously until an incident occurs. - Africa and Mali: Russia’s activities in Africa, especially Mali, are described as significant. Mali’s leadership under Asimi Goata is navigating between Western and Russian influence. Russian forces, including elements from the former Wagner group now under the Russian defense ministry, are described as rebuilding Mali’s military and supporting a campaign by jihadist groups. The situation includes rapid, mobile “flying columns” that can cause chaos but lack staying power against organized defenses. Russian drones and aviation (including ME-20 aircraft) are reportedly effective, and Mali is moving toward energy and resource development, including three nuclear power plants proposed by Russia to Elektrify the country. France’s position is framed as colonial, with Mali’s uranium, gold, and other resources creating strategic interest. Burkina Faso’s involvement and regional dynamics involving Niger are cited as part of a broader, expanding conflict network across Africa. - Global frontlines and war risk: The guest argues that multiple frontlines are forming—Ukraine, the Persian Gulf, and Western Africa—and that they could merge into a single broader conflict if not stopped. He asserts that the West is driving this escalation, and he characterizes Western public sentiment as often indifferent to Ukrainian casualties, focusing instead on political or financial gains from the conflict. - Frontline realities: On the ground, Ukraine has tactical successes but limited staying power due to heavy casualties and supply problems. Russian forces are reportedly stronger in Donbas, Kherson, and Sumy, while Ukrainian forces face difficult conditions, including open fields and heavy artillery advantages for the Russians. Drone warfare has prompted reorganized Russian drone corps, with improved training and standardized units. The discussion ends with a warning that the conflict has global implications, with fronts expanding and risks of a broader, possibly world-scale war if not curtailed. The interviewee emphasizes that the West’s actions are fueling escalation and that African theaters, particularly Mali, are becoming an integral part of the wider confrontation.

Directed EMP weapons have been developed, and the founder of Palantir, an AI platform used by the military, has played a significant role in revolutionizing warfare. The capability to neutralize drones was available at any moment.

All drones are produced by Changhome Factory, a Chinese military-controlled factory, with assembly lines in Iran, Saudi Arabia, and possibly other countries. The speaker highlights the importance of understanding Russia's involvement in the Ukraine war and the Middle East. They question whether China supplies weapons to Russia, but clarify that the CCP doesn't directly provide weapons since all their weapon technologies come from Russia. Russia has its own weapon manufacturers in China, making it unnecessary for the CCP to supply weapons. The speaker emphasizes that these are strategic games and mentions Miles Guo's whistleblowing about CCP sending Rocket Force troops to Russia for the Ukraine war.

Speaker 0 discusses China’s newest radar systems and their potential impact on battlefield reliability, suggesting that the US’s long-held advantages could become obsolete. The segment centers on emerging technologies such as quantum radar, which, according to the presentation, would make even the stealthiest aircraft lose its most potent capability. Speaker 1 states that China may have just flipped the game on stealth technology. A new six g powered system backed by cutting edge photonics can generate over 3,600 radar illusions and even jam and communicate simultaneously. It is designed to target frequencies used by advanced jets like the F-thirty five, potentially exposing them to detection. With the ability to link 300 plus platforms in real time, this innovation could reshape the future of aerial operations. The question raised is whether this marks the end of stealth as we know it. To dive deeper, the presenters set out the following points: China’s latest radar technology is described as a significant international development with the potential to alter how stealth capabilities are perceived and utilized in modern warfare. The six g powered system is highlighted for its photonics-driven capabilities, enabling it to create a large number of radar illusions while simultaneously jamming and communicating. The system’s targeting of frequencies associated with advanced jets, including the F-35, is presented as a key factor in its potential to expose otherwise stealthy platforms to detection. A further capability emphasized is the system’s capacity to link more than 300 platforms in real time, suggesting a highly integrated and coordinated network that could redefine aerial operations. The discussion implies that these features collectively could challenge established stealth advantages and prompt a reevaluation of modern air superiority strategies. The phrase “quantum radar, which could make even the stealthiest aircraft lose its most potent capability” is repeated as a framing device for the advanced technology under consideration. The overall message is that China’s developing radar and photonics-enabled systems, combined with networked platform linkage, are positioned to alter the balance in aerial combat and provoke questions about the durability of stealth in future warfare.

Ukrainians at the NATO Innovation Summit stated 30% of their casualties were from drone strikes. In the Kursk offensive, drones account for the majority, if not almost all, of Russian tank and vehicle losses. FPV drones are currently operated in a one v one fashion. In the next few years, drone warfare will evolve to one v many. Command and data links, essential for drone operation, are becoming more vital. Countermeasures exist to jam or deny these links. The goal is to make drones more autonomous, enabling one operator to control many drones simultaneously.

Three mystery drones are in the air, and it's quite strange. What’s going on?

Speaker 0 discusses Whitney Webb's article about HHS Protect and a program called Tiberius provided by Palantir. He claims this is the same Tiberius program believed to be using Gaza to identify drone strike targets, described as the "Homos targets." He states the program was used for Operation Warp Speed to assign people behavior scores, indicating whether they got vaccines, wore masks, or practiced distancing, and that it could reveal location data, ethnicity, finances, and people they have been around. The Tiberius program, he says, would use that information to assign a behavior score. He adds that hospitals sent data such as case mix index and ventilator usage, and that this data was used to target countermeasure strikes—deciding where to send ventilators, remdesivir, and vaccines that people were not taking. He calls this the "Volunteer Tiberias program" and argues that the nefarious aspect is amplified by the existence of drones in America, noting that police in his state and county have had contracts since 2011 to obtain drones and are using them. He mentions a firearms response team acronym, FIT, which would deploy a drone to engage with persons suspected of having firearms instead of sending a police officer, framing it as safer for officers but potentially dangerous for drones. Speaker 0 clarifies whether these are armed or observational drones, speculating they are currently observational. He references a peer-reviewed article about deploying COVID countermeasures with drones delivering packages, including vaccines. He suggests it wouldn’t be hard, noting the military already has LMAMS (low observable munitions or autonomous flying drones) capable of autonomous swarms, which could be used as weapons or to deliver drugs. He closes by tying these points to the possibility of drones playing a role in enforcing countermeasures and distributing medical or military payloads.

Directed EMP weapons were discussed, highlighting their potential to disable drones at any moment. The conversation also touched on the founder of Palantir, a significant AI platform utilized by the military, which has transformed modern warfare.

El ejército chino demostró las capacidades de sus drones FPV, destacando sus grandes enjambres capaces de operar conjuntamente. **English Translation:** The Chinese army demonstrated the capabilities of its FPV drones, highlighting their large swarms that can work together.

Drones: A year ago, Ukraine had more drones, but now drone numbers are roughly at parity. Both sides launch a similar number of drones. Russia uses fiber optic drones more actively, which are immune to Western electronic warfare systems. These drones render jamming antennas useless. The army is actively using unmanned systems, including remotely controlled carts that can carry ammo, food, evacuate wounded soldiers, or carry explosives. Russia considers its approach to warfare as complex, dangerous, and highly professional.

There’s a looming situation involving unidentified flying objects and drones, reminiscent of a chaotic scenario like in "Independence Day." While it seems unlikely, strange occurrences often become reality. Recently, swarms of 20-foot drones have been spotted around military bases, and their ownership and control remain unclear. It’s concerning that the military may not be able to track the signals directing these drones. These drones could potentially be part of a new type of weapon, designed to operate without reporting back until their mission is complete. The uncertainty surrounding these incidents raises significant questions about security and surveillance.

Drones have been appearing over military bases, coordinating simultaneous operations across multiple locations. These drones, some resembling quadcopters with multiple blades, are believed to be collecting intelligence for a large-scale attack, possibly involving multiple countries. Despite military protocols, there are limitations on responding to these drones, including FAA regulations preventing them from being shot down without approval. The drones are thought to operate autonomously, using advanced technology to evade detection and gather detailed scans of military assets. Concerns arise about the implications of this activity, with some speculating it could be a deep state operation to justify stricter drone regulations. The military is actively developing countermeasures but feels overwhelmed by the persistent drone presence.

This is the next generation of LA set products, designed for group attacks. Instead of a remote control, a special launch system for multiple drones has been developed. With 20-30 of these launch systems, a swarm of drones can be launched, making it impossible to hide. There is also an individual launch container that doubles as transportation. The drones can be launched from these containers and directed towards the target. This technology allows for easy coordination and selection of targets within the drone swarm. It has already been tested in previous generations.

China is about to reveal something never seen before, giant autonomous underwater drones. At Beijing's upcoming parade, at least six massive submersibles, including the AGX zero zero two, will make their public debut. These drones stretch nearly 20 meters and could transform the future of undersea technology. Analysts believe they may operate for long periods, carry advanced sensors, and even signal a shift toward new types of ocean exploration and surveillance. To dive deeper, click the link to watch our full video and don't forget to like, share, and subscribe. Also, you can visit our website, spaceinues.com. Thank you for watching. See you there.

Speaker 0 reports that while attention was on US aircraft carriers, China quietly broke the air blockade in Asia over the past forty-eight hours. The claim is that 16 Chinese Y-20 military cargo planes took off, then vanished from radar, turning their transponders off and flying completely dark. Their destination is stated as Iran. According to multiple intel sources cited in the transcript, what these planes carried was not food or humanitarian aid but advanced electronic warfare systems. The systems are described as the kind built to blind US carrier-based F-35 jets. The assertion is that China may have provided Iran with technology to jam American aircraft right in the middle of the Persian Gulf standoff. The sequence is summarized as: 16 aircraft, zero radio signals, and a full airborne supply chain delivered under America’s nose. The transcript emphasizes the supposed significance of this development, suggesting that if true, the balance of power over the Middle East could have shifted without widespread notice. The final framing centers on the potential implications: the real question posed is what action the United States will take next, given the alleged delivery of electronic warfare capability to Iran and the covert nature of the operation. The account stresses that this development allegedly occurred while global attention was focused on US aircraft carriers, implying it represents a strategic surprise with potentially far-reaching consequences for regional and global security dynamics.

Recent reports indicate a rise in drone activity near 17 U.S. military bases close to Chinese-owned farmland. These sightings have been observed near bases in Hawaii, as well as installations in Utah, California, Maine, and Florida.

Dmitry Sims junior hosts lieutenant general Abty Alaudinov, hero of Russia, hero of the Chechen Republic, hero of the Donetsk People’s Republic, commander of the Akhmet Special Forces, and deputy head of the main military political directorate of the Russian Ministry of Defense. The conversation centers on the current phase of the conflict, Russia’s strategy, the role of Western support, and comparisons with Israeli actions in Gaza and other theaters. Key points and claims: - Russia’s combat capability and strategy - Alaudinov states that “overall, all troops of the Russian Federation’s Ministry of Defense are engaged in active offensive operations across all sectors where we’re positioned,” with the most intense fighting around Pokrovsk, seen as the key point to break through to operational space. He notes progress in sectors where the Ahmad (Akhmet) special forces operate and emphasizes a broader offensive plan while maintaining an “active defense” to engage the entire front line and stretch the enemy’s resources. - He asserts that “only Russia is advancing” along the 1,000-kilometer line of contact and attributes slower offensive tempo to preserving personnel and avoiding a sharp breakthrough that could trigger NATO involvement. He argues the primary damage comes from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) on both sides, and contends a rapid thrust would yield enormous losses. - Perceived signs of enemy strain - The speaker describes Ukraine as gradually crumbling under pressure, with Pokrovsk, Kupiansk, and the surrounding agglomeration “gradually falling apart.” He claims Russia liberates one or two settlements daily and that NATO support—drones and equipment—has not changed the overall dynamics; Ukraine cannot hold the front despite the influx of foreign weapons. - Western/NATO support - Alaudinov asserts that NATO testing is ongoing on Ukraine with drones, weapons, electronic warfare, etc., and that Trump’s shifting rhetoric does not reduce the flow of weapons or support. He contends that American support persists even as political statements change, and he notes deep American-NATO involvement via think tanks, satellites, and arms supplies that reach the front. - Drones and the changing nature of war - He emphasizes drones as the central element of modern warfare, while not negating the continued relevance of artillery and tanks. He argues: “a tank worth millions of dollars can be destroyed by a drone that costs $500,” and stresses the need to compete economically in war, deploying cheaper, effective unmanned systems to exhaust the enemy’s resources. - He claims Russia has a layered drone system for deep reconnaissance and strike with various warhead levels, ranges, and maneuverability, enabling operations from closest to farthest sectors and allowing “all targets” to be hit today. He asserts Russia is ahead of NATO in unmanned aviation. - Mobilization and tactics - Refuting Western depictions of “meat assaults,” he notes Russia conducted only one mobilization (300,000) and has continued advancing, while Ukraine has mobilized for years and still struggles. He attributes Ukraine’s resilience to nationalist formations behind mobilized troops, and he suggests that without NATO support, Ukraine would not sustain the front for many days. - Mercenaries and comparisons to Israeli actions - He characterizes Western mercenaries as having arrived with false expectations and being killed off in large numbers; Ukrainians are described as having strong spirit, but NATO soldiers lack endurance in the same way. Israeli mercenaries are described as capable in some contexts but not decisive against Russia. - On Gaza and the Israeli army, Alaudinov accuses Israel of “a fascist state” with tactics that spare no one, arguing Russia fights only those who fight with weapons and does not target women, children, or elders. He contrasts this with alleged Israeli actions in Gaza, saying Israel has no tactics and destroys civilians. - Nuclear considerations and doctrine - He asserts Russia is a nuclear power with substantial combat experience and advances in missiles like Zircon that could sink carriers, arguing NATO did not account for Russia’s capabilities when initiating the conflict. He presents a broader critique of Western policy and the so-called “deep state,” alleging far-reaching political dynamics involving Israel, Epstein, and compromise among Western leadership. - Closing perspective - The discussion closes with the host thanking Alaudinov for the detailed analysis of the operation and broader geopolitical commentary, including views on Israel, Gaza, Iran, and U.S. roles.

El ejército chino demostró las capacidades de sus drones FPV, destacando sus grandes enjambres capaces de operar conjuntamente. **Translation:** The Chinese army demonstrated the capabilities of its FPV drones, highlighting their large swarms that can work together.

El ejército chino demostró las capacidades de sus drones FPV, destacando sus grandes enjambres capaces de operar conjuntamente. **English Translation:** The Chinese army demonstrated the capabilities of its FPV drones, highlighting their large swarms that can work together.

El ejército chino demostró las capacidades de sus drones FPV, destacando sus grandes enjambres capaces de operar conjuntamente. **Translation:** The Chinese army demonstrated the capabilities of its FPV drones, highlighting their large swarms that can work together.