reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Amir Farsud, who suffers from constant agony due to a back injury, has applied for medically assisted dying (MAID) because he can't find affordable housing. He survives on Ontario disability support payments of just over $1200 a month. Farsud meets the criteria for MAID, as his physical suffering cannot be relieved. His doctor has already signed off on the application, and he is waiting for a second doctor to do the same. Farsud doesn't want to die, but being homeless is not an option for him. He hopes to access MAID in about a month.

The speaker expresses concerns about MAID, highlighting issues with the drug sodium thiopental used in the procedure. They discuss the potential drowning effect of the drug and criticize the lack of transparency in the process. The speaker questions the ethics of MAID, pointing out the financial motivations behind it and the impact on vulnerable individuals. They emphasize the need for honesty and moral integrity in these practices.

When medically assisted dying (MAID) became legal in Canada in 2016, it was limited to those facing imminent death, but accessibility expanded in March. Critics argue that MAID devalues the lives of people with disabilities, particularly those living in poverty. The Netherlands has monthly reviews of assisted dying cases, while Canada only publishes annual statistics. Last year, MAID accounted for 3.3% of deaths in Canada, with cancer as the leading cause. Although many seek MAID, the federal government emphasizes safeguards to ensure eligibility is carefully considered. Canada is set to further expand MAID eligibility to include individuals with mental disorders, potentially increasing its prevalence to about 4% of all deaths, similar to Belgium and the Netherlands.

Since 2016, euthanasia has been legal in Canada, with plans to extend it to mental health conditions next year. In June 2019, Alan Nichols, 61, requested euthanasia after being hospitalized in Chilliwack and died by lethal injection. His brother, Gary, shares that while assisted dying can be compassionate, its loose application can put families in difficult situations. Before hospitalization, Alan faced challenges from a benign brain tumor diagnosed at age 12, which led to surgeries that impaired his right side and hearing. Despite these challenges, he lived a relatively normal life, engaging in daily activities, and was not completely incapacitated. Gary emphasizes that Alan's life was still worth living, raising concerns about the criteria for euthanasia.

Dan Dix opens by presenting a stark portrait of Canada, praising compassion and healthcare but asserting a dark secret: ninety thousand lives have been killed through Canada’s medical assistance in dying program (MAiD) since legalization in 2016. He asserts this number is an estimate based on what is known and that the true figure could be higher, noting that doctors are sometimes under pressure to propose MAID even when patients do not raise it. He frames MAiD as a system that is accelerating, claiming it has become the leading cause of death in some provinces and that, in 2024, nearly five percent of all deaths in Canada were due to MAID—one in every twenty deaths. Dix argues the scope has expanded beyond terminal illness to include poverty, mental health, or simply feeling like a burden. He alleges veterans with PTSD, disabled individuals, and people who cannot afford housing are being offered MAID. He contends this is not compassionate care but a “conveyor belt to death” sold as dignity, and accuses the government of not fully disclosing the data. He provides anecdotes, saying he knows a man who was offered MAID three times during a single hospital visit, clarifying that the person wanted help, not an option to end his life. He characterizes Canada’s euthanasia regime as a machine “chewing up the vulnerable, the poor, and the broken, and spitting out body bags,” and asserts the world is watching, labeling Canada as “progressive” while describing the situation as a dystopian nightmare. In addressing what should be done, Dix encourages discussion, sharing the video, and demanding answers about why Canada is promoting death as a solution to suffering. He emphasizes the 90,000 figure as representing real people with families and futures. Dix references his video featuring Angelina Ireland from the Delta Hospice Society, describing how the government allegedly took her property for refusing to participate in MAID and allegedly sent “death cult activists” to shut her down. He asserts that there is resistance to MAID and calls for support for that movement. He promotes audience action: share the video, join the fight for life, and support his efforts via donations at pressfortruth.ca/donate, with options for one-time PayPal donations, monthly contributions, e-transfer to Dan@pressfortruth.ca, or mail to his P.O. box. Dix concludes by urging viewers to choose life over death, promising more video reports, and signing off with a call to subscribe, like, share, and stay tuned. He closes with a reiteration of “truth” as the guiding message.

The conversation centers on serious concerns about medical assistance in dying (MAID) in Canada, with Dr. York Sang offering observations from his experience as a retired vascular surgeon and professor. The discussion covers how MAID is carried out, what drugs are used, how death is defined and monitored, and broader systemic issues in Canadian healthcare and autopsy practices. Key points raised - Realities of MAID versus expectations: The hosts note that MAID is not quick or necessarily painless, and that its dignity is attributed to one drug that causes paralysis, making death appear orderly to onlookers rather than to the patient. Dr. Sang agrees that, based on a large Canadian cohort, the process is not always quick or painless, and its perceived dignity largely stems from the paralytic drug used. - Drug regimens and their administration: The described MAID protocol commonly uses a sequence mirroring execution methods: a sedative (a large dose of a benzodiazepine, such as midazolam), followed by an anesthetic (propofol), then a paralytic, and finally a cardiotoxic agent to cause death. The typical MAID drug kit is presented as a standard set, with most patients receiving the sedative, anesthetic, and paralytic, but only about a quarter receiving a cardiotoxic “kill shot” (e.g., potassium chloride or a high-dose local anesthetic to cause fatal rhythm disruption). Approximately 90% of patients receive the sedative, anesthetic, and paralytic; about 25% receive the cardiotoxic agent. The time to death varies widely, with an average around nine minutes but ranges from one minute to over two hours; about a quarter die after more than an hour, according to the cited data. - Training and oversight concerns: Dr. Sang and Odessa discuss that most MAID providers are not anesthesiologists, and that a small minority of doctors—predominantly family physicians, rural GP-anesthetists—provide MAID without specialized training in anesthesia or MAID pharmacology. They argue that 79% of MAID providers had little to no formal training in the drugs used. This raises questions about monitoring, recognition of pain or distress, and ensuring consistency in death certification. - Monitoring and definitions of death: A major thread is the lack of continuous monitoring during MAID and the reliance on clinical death (no heart sounds, no breathing). Dr. Sang notes that the brain is likely still functioning for several minutes after clinical death, suggesting that the patient may still experience distress or wakefulness prior to the official death declaration. There is debate over whether brain activity should guide the determination of death, with some arguing for brain-wave monitoring to avoid premature cessation of artificial support. - Autopsy and post-mortem questions: The discussion references historical concerns from Dr. Joel Zivitt (a Canadian-turned-U.S.-based anesthesiologist) about deaths in the U.S. execution context and why autopsies were performed there. He reported that many blood samples showed anesthetic levels below surgical anesthesia at the time of death, and autopsies revealed pulmonary edema in a large majority of examined cases, raising questions about whether the anesthesia dosing and drug combinations may contribute to distressing end-of-life phenomena. - The pool of providers and ethics: The conversation touches on the notion that MAID is driven by a small, possibly specialized group of physicians, with concerns about whether some providers “hold back” from giving a full, lethal cocktail or whether systemic issues (time pressures, workload) influence practice. Dr. Sang emphasizes that the problem is not that MAID is necessarily too available, but that its execution lacks standardized training, monitoring, and ethical safeguards. - The broader policy and culture context: BC and Quebec are highlighted as leading provinces in MAID uptake, with BC representing nearly seven percent of all deaths due to MAID—almost double the national average. The participants discuss how expanding indications, including discussions about younger individuals or even pediatric cases, are part of ongoing debates in Canada, contrasted with other Western jurisdictions that push back against broader MAID access. - Alternatives: Dr. Sang advocates for palliative care as the preferable approach for terminal illness, noting that opioids (e.g., morphine) and comfort-focused care can offer relief without MAID. A striking point raised is that in the discussed MAID data, zero-point-six percent of patients received any narcotics during MAID. In summary, the dialogue presents a critical view of MAID implementation in Canada, focusing on drug cocktails and their administration, the adequacy of training and monitoring, the meaning and verification of death, and calls for greater emphasis on palliative care and autopsy-based scrutiny to ensure end-of-life practices align with patients’ comfort and dignity. The conversation also situates these concerns within broader provincial trends and policy debates around MAID’s expansion.

As a result of a vaccine injury, Speaker 0 says they were forced into medical retirement at age 46, ending a career they loved without the ability to choose when or how it would end. Speaker 0 describes the situation as dynamic and evolving, “not well understood,” and says the journey led them to the United States in 2023 and again in 2024 to seek private medical care and specialized diagnostics. Speaker 0 reports selling their dental practice, using crowdfunding, and eventually undergoing brain surgery with a biopsy to relieve brain compression. They state that the brain surgery alone cost $148,000. Speaker 0 says no one in Canada helped them, claiming that Canadian clinicians would see the onset of the injury and reject referrals, and that it took years of self-advocacy to receive diagnoses. Speaker 0 says they have been diagnosed with numerous neurological and immune-mediated conditions, and that these conditions continue to progress rapidly. They state that, for many Canadians, without early recognition in medical care the prognosis is poor. Speaker 0 says they and others are still living with the consequences of the past six years, including exhaustion, division, distrust, and damage that never truly healed. They say there has been no acknowledgement, no meaningful support, no medical care where promised, and no accountability. Speaker 0 compares the situation to a society that “refuses to learn from its past,” stating it eventually “relives what it failed to confront.” They describe ongoing living impacts: vision loss; nerve damage; loss of feelings throughout their face and limbs; ongoing white matter brain lesions; difficulty maintaining an upright position; balance impairment; and relentless neurological pain. Speaker 0 states that sharp electric shocks, burning sensations, “zapping” pain, and numbness occur every minute of every day for five years, along with brain inflammation due to an immune response that has never resolved. They also report ongoing cystic masses in multiple organs, including their brain, and say they spend 90% of their life homebound and are bedbound.

Speaker 0 states that the Journal of Death and Dying, in 2025, published Health Canada's plans to save money by shifting to MAID (medical assistance in dying) rather than palliative care. The plan projects savings from 2027 to 2047 amounting to $1,273,000,000,000 by providing fourteen point seven million Canadians with MAID. The breakdown of those fourteen point seven million Canadians includes: - Over nine million projected to be elderly. - Over four million projected to be mentally ill and suicidal. - Over three hundred thousand projected to be Indigenous. - The remainder described as addicts, homeless, and others. Speaker 0 emphasizes that Canada is running a program and intends to expand it, including a mentally ill only qualification beginning in 2027. They note that the statistics are "disgusting" to them and direct listeners to check the SAGE journal, or the Journal of Death and Dying, for the detailed breakdown, stating that the sources go through the numbers. They also mention that they have covered these figures on their series as well.

It's crazy. They'll do it if you're just depressed. They'll do it if you don't like being overweight. It's awful. It's a lot of the vaccine injured are doing it. They're going to Switzerland to Canada for this. The Canada numbers are bananas. More than fifteen thousand people received medical assisted assistance in dying in Canada in 2023. Yes. What is it in 2024 now? Imagine 2025, where they're this is crazy. 15,000 people, they've helped them die instead of, like, help them live. Instead of, we used to call suicide hotline. Hey. Don't do it, Bob. And now Canada's, like, come on in. Press 1 if you want the suicide and see appointment for you.

People are going to Switzerland and Canada for medical assistance in dying, including vaccine-injured individuals. In Canada, over 15,000 people received medical assistance in dying in 2023. The speaker questions this, suggesting that the focus should be on helping people live instead of facilitating death. They compare it to suicide hotlines that aim to prevent suicide. The speaker suggests exploring options to improve people's health and well-being, addressing hormone levels and other physical issues that may contribute to depression.

Margaret Ricus, a 64-year-old living in Langley, BC, developed regional pain syndrome after a sidewalk accident in 2005. This nervous condition causes constant burning pain in her hand, disrupting her life and hobbies. The pain requires fentanyl, pregabalon, and nebula nebula for management, but after her family doctor left, she struggled to find a physician to prescribe them due to concerns about opioid prescriptions. Ricus believes the government has overreacted, affecting legitimate pain patients. She was essentially offered MAID (Medical Assistance in Dying) instead, which she equates to denying other essential medications. Ricus opposes MAID due to her faith, her love for her family, and her role in her church. She hopes to find a doctor who will prescribe her medication so she can live to see her grandchildren grow up.

In 2016, Canada and California legalized medical assistance in dying. Despite having similar populations, California has seen only 893 cases of assisted suicide, while Canada has reported over 50,000. This stark difference raises concerns about Canada's approach, which some view as predatory. Critics argue that instead of providing palliative care, Canada is expanding eligibility for assisted dying to vulnerable groups, including children as young as 12, the mentally ill, homeless individuals, and addicts.

Before we start, I want to say something that cannot be said enough. Even now, people are unnecessarily dying because the Dutch authorities do not allow a reliable and effective medicine. This is a serious and major scandal. I have mentioned it several times before, but it cannot be emphasized enough. This is terrible and it reflects the situation we are in.

There is concern over the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario suggesting psychiatric medication for unvaccinated individuals. This recommendation is seen as unethical and a dangerous path to labeling those who choose not to get vaccinated as mentally ill. This slippery slope is alarming. The speaker is thanked for their courage and support from the people of Canada.

The speaker discusses concerns about Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) in Canada, highlighting issues with the drug sodium thiopental and its potential for causing drowning during the procedure. Autopsies reveal troubling details about the process, contradicting claims of a painless death. The speaker also mentions cases of families being denied access to autopsy reports. These revelations raise questions about the ethics and transparency of MAID practices in Canada.

Thousands of Canadians diagnosed with injuries from COVID vaccines have gone years without support, including nurse Lori Irving. Irving said she was required to be vaccinated to work, but now lives with latent autoimmune diabetes that doctors say was caused by a COVID vaccine. She said Manitoba’s health system took too long to diagnose her condition, and she missed a three-year deadline to apply for support. More than 3,500 people have sought help from Canada’s vaccine injury program, but only 252 have successfully navigated the program’s red tape to receive assistance. Shannon Dupont described the process as a “nightmare,” saying payments are sometimes months behind and that at one point the program owed her more than $15,000 for prescriptions. Conservative MP Dean Allison announced he will host four days of testimony on Parliament Hill in September, where people can share their stories and frustrations. He said Canadians agree on a principle that people harmed by COVID vaccines deserve compensation, support, transparency, and timely assistance. He said the responsibility includes recognizing injuries, listening to survivors, and caring for them. The program’s stated goal, as described in the coverage, is that by hearing from injured people, the government will be motivated to improve the program for those denied support. According to the Public Health Agency of Canada, more than 3,000 claims are still being processed after the agency took over the program from a third party at the start of April.

Amir Farsud has applied for medically assisted dying (MAID) due to constant agony from a back injury and the impending sale of his rooming house, leaving him unable to find affordable housing. Surviving on over $100 a month from Ontario disability support, he faces the reality of homelessness. Although he meets the criteria for MAID due to his physical suffering, his true motivation stems from the fear of being homeless. His doctor has signed off on the application, and he is awaiting a second approval, with a potential access to MAID in about a month. Despite his pain, Farsud expresses a desire to live, emphasizing that he does not wish to die.

When medically assisted dying (MAID) became legal in Canada in 2016, it was limited to those facing imminent death. Accessibility expanded in March, raising concerns about the devaluation of life for people with disabilities living in poverty. The rapid increase in requests for MAID, particularly among those in financial distress, has surprised many. Unlike the Netherlands, Canada lacks regular reviews of assisted dying cases, although it does provide annual statistics. In the last year, MAID accounted for 3.3% of all deaths in Canada, with cancer being the most common reason. The federal government emphasizes enhanced safeguards, asserting that two doctors would unlikely approve MAID if a person's suffering could be alleviated through available treatments. Canada is set to further expand eligibility to include those with mental disorders, aligning with practices in Belgium and the Netherlands.

Danielle Smith's new gender and pronoun policy is causing controversy. The Alberta Medical Association released an open letter stating that the decision to seek gender affirming care should be between a person and their doctor. They also mentioned that puberty blocking agents are not irreversible and have benefits. The surgeries targeted by the program were not happening, as bottom surgery is not available in Canada for patients under 18. Concerns were raised about creating a private registry of physicians providing gender affirming care as it is seen as a surveillance measure. The government did not consult with a child and youth advocate, and other medical associations have also opposed the program. The Alberta government sent out a poll asking whether parental consent should be required for abortions for those under 18, which is seen as an attempt to strip rights from young people. This puts trans kids at risk for political gain.

As a psychiatrist in community mental health, I've seen how MAID affects my patients. Some express a desire to stop treatment, feeling they can choose to die instead. This shift undermines our efforts to support their recovery; we're now focused on preventing MAID as much as preventing suicide. I recall a patient, Ray, 62, with metastatic lung cancer, who had long sought MAID. When I confirmed his eligibility, I witnessed a physical transformation in him—his shoulders relaxed, and he smiled for the first time. He decided to proceed with MAID, and during the process, he expressed gratitude, saying, "I think you saved my life." This highlights the importance of providing care for those who truly need and want it.

A woman shares a heartbreaking story about a 13-year-old girl who had cancer and was convinced by doctors and nurses at a hospital in Edmonton, Alberta to end her own life using medical assistance in dying (MAID). The girl's parents had left her briefly to get some supplies when this happened. The mother, who had come to the hospital the day after her daughter's death, was devastated and felt helpless because the girl had signed the consent form. The speaker expresses anger towards the healthcare system and advises parents to keep their children away from hospitals. They also mention an article from CBC that claims MAID will save a significant amount of money in healthcare expenses.

The government is aggressively expanding the MAID program to include mental health disorders for euthanasia. A 27-year-old woman with autism and ADHD was approved for MAID and euthanized despite her father's efforts to stop it. There are concerns that vaccine-injured individuals will be pushed towards MAID. Canadians are complacent about these changes, which now include allowing children to make end-of-life decisions without parental consent. Canada has the loosest standards for euthanasia globally. The UK is also facing similar terrifying developments.