reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In Bucks County, the line for voting wraps around the building. Many people have been waiting for hours. One woman, who arrived at 1 PM, expressed frustration about not being able to return on Tuesday due to babysitting obligations, highlighting a sense of disenfranchisement. Another voter, Cindy Deaner, has been waiting since 9 AM and feels frustrated as well. She cannot vote on Tuesday because of work commitments. The situation reflects a broader issue of inadequate staffing at polling places, leaving many voters unable to cast their ballots. Despite the long wait, some are determined to vote, while others have already left due to the lengthy lines.

In Bucks County, the line for voting wraps around the building, with many people waiting for hours. Some individuals express frustration about the long wait, with one person stating they arrived at 9 AM and are still waiting at 1:30 PM. Others mention they cannot return to vote on Tuesday due to work obligations, feeling disenfranchised. Despite the long wait, some are determined to cast their votes. Concerns are raised about the lack of staffing at the polling place, suggesting that officials were aware of the need for more personnel but failed to act. Many have already left the line due to the wait, highlighting the issue of accessibility for voters.

I went to vote for the first time in California, bringing my proof of address and ID. Arriving at a polling place in San Diego, I found a long line and noticed the building's rundown appearance. I spoke with the man in front of me, who was also voting for the first time and had just decided to support Trump. The line kept growing, and I registered to vote on the spot without needing to show ID. I received a green conditional voter registration envelope for my ballot. By the time I left around 4 PM, the line had grown significantly, and I had waited an hour. Those still waiting would likely wait about two hours. I put on my sticker and officially voted in California.

**Spanish Summary:** Un grupo está registrando votantes hispanos en Phoenix. Una señora ya está registrada por su trabajo. Otra persona puso que quería votar en una aplicación, pero está esperando la residencia. Planea votar por Kamala Harris y nació en Cuba. Otra persona es residente y ya está registrada para votar por su trabajo. Otra persona no es ciudadana y ya llenó la registración. Alguien dice que el primer día van a empezar a sacar gente. **English Translation:** A group is registering Hispanic voters in Phoenix. One woman is already registered through her job. Another person indicated they wanted to vote on an application but is waiting for residency. They plan to vote for Kamala Harris and were born in Cuba. Another person is a resident and is already registered to vote through their job. Another person is not a citizen and has already filled out the registration. Someone says that on the first day, they will start removing people.

On Monday, a large number of applications were submitted, many dated from June. These were delivered to the election bureau on the last day of registration, and one of the forms belonged to someone specific. There are various issues surrounding this situation.

I'm at the Levittstown voting center, where the line is wrapped around the building and barely moving. The staff isn't rushing things, and people are waiting a long time. Some have been in line for about 3 hours, while others have waited even longer—4 hours, 6 hours, and even 6 and a half hours. There are chairs set up for those waiting, and some have brought pizza and drinks to pass the time. Despite the long wait, everyone is determined to hold their place in line.

A group of about 12 foreigners arrived to vote. Younger individuals assisted them in filling out their voter information. They managed to bypass a two-hour line and approached a polling official. However, there was an issue with one woman's name not being in the system. The group suggested they could change it on the spot, raising questions about how that could be done.

A group discusses voting issues as some individuals express frustration over being unable to vote. One person mentions needing to bring someone to vote by 4:00 PM, but another insists that voting is closed. They argue about the right to vote until 4:30 PM, with one person claiming that the line was cut off at 1:45 PM due to high volume. Accusations of voter fraud arise, with claims that the process is unfair. The conversation escalates as individuals demand accountability and express disbelief over the situation, insisting that everyone in line should be allowed to vote until the official closing time.

A person attempted to vote early, but the scanner was broken. Staff said they would scan the ballot later, after everyone left, and offered to put it in a box. The person declined and said they would return another day.

My friend tried to help her nephew get a driver's license in Pompano Beach, Florida, but they were turned away twice and told to return at 6 am. When they arrived early, they found a large group of Somali illegal immigrants, mostly military-age men, waiting. They were not allowed to film the scene. The speaker criticized the situation and mentioned the ease of obtaining a driver's license for voting purposes. They also blamed Kamala Harris for allowing these people into the country.

I woke up this morning determined to vote, feeling it was important to participate in the election. At the Episcopal Church in Cape Coral, Florida, I waited in line for about 30 minutes. When I presented my ID, the representative informed me that I had already voted by mail, which I denied. I expressed my concerns about mail-in voting being easily manipulated. The representative called someone for assistance, and after about 15 minutes, they were able to delete the erroneous vote. I was finally allowed to vote, but I felt anxious and confused, especially since I had just registered a week and a half ago. It’s unsettling to think that my vote could have been intercepted, and I’ll never know who I supposedly voted for by mail.

A group of about 12 foreigners arrived to vote. Younger individuals assisted them in filling out their voter registration forms. They managed to bypass a two-hour line and approached a polling station. However, one woman was told her name wasn't in the system. The group suggested they could go back and change it, raising questions about how names could be altered.

They go to the New York City Board of Elections office at 200 Varick Street, 10th Floor, in New York, NY, planning to pose as a non-citizen, Canadian green card holder to see how far they can get in the voter registration process. They note that a clerk initially says you must be a citizen to fill out the registration, but another clerk claims they “accept anything that comes over the counter” and that there are people who have legal situations and registered when they weren’t a citizen. The first clerk’s behavior raises concern: he does not tell them it would be illegal to complete the application as a noncitizen, only that he wouldn’t recommend it. The participants press for clarity. The first clerk admits that “we can’t stop you from submitting the application and if it goes through, but most likely because they don’t do like a full background check,” and adds that “once in a while, you know, we have people who come in here and they have legal situations and they registered, they weren’t a citizen, boom, boom, boom.” The participants quote that as a direct admission that non-citizens are in fact registering to vote. One participant asks if they can fill out the form, and the clerk responds: “Up to you. That’s right. I can’t tell you what to do. You wanna fill that, fill it out. But everything is clear clearly stated, especially at this bottom, it says American citizens.” The participant asks if the clerk would report them; the clerk says “No. No. No. I’m not, no. I’m not that’s not my job to report anyone. My job is just to collect the application and put it and submit it to the department.” The clerk adds that they “accept anything that comes over the counter, you know.” Under New York election law, section 17-106, it is stated that “any election officer who willfully violates any provision of the election law relative to the registration of electors is guilty of a felony.” The participants note it would be a criminal offense for the worker to process their voter registration after admitting to being a noncitizen. They ask if they can take materials with them and the clerk confirms they can “take one of these.” The participants are told that they can fill out the form, and if it comes back or doesn’t, they will submit it; the clerk reiterates that they “can’t do our background check on you. We just collect it.” On leaving, they decide not to submit any application, since doing so would be illegal. They later return to gather more information, but the worker becomes suspicious, consults a coworker, and then changes his stance and refuses to accept the application. They observe that at these centers, there is no requirement to show ID, Social Security, or any proof of identification; all you have to do is sign an affidavit stating you are an American citizen. They describe this as a potential threat to the integrity of the U.S. electoral system. They conclude with the implication that non-citizen registrations have occurred and question how many such forms have been processed.

I'm going to do some sparring and check online. A question arises about bringing someone to vote at 4 o'clock. Voting is reportedly closed, but there's confusion because people believe they have the right to vote until 4:30. One person explains that the process is slow due to high volume, leading to a cutoff at 1:45. This prompts accusations of voter fraud, claiming that cutting the line is unjust. Despite the explanation that the cutoff is posted, the frustration continues, with claims that everyone in line should be allowed to vote until 4:30 on election day. Tensions rise as accusations of election fraud are exchanged, and the situation remains heated.

The process is slow and grueling, leading to the decision to close the line at 1:45 PM due to high demand. Many people were still waiting, but they had to stop accepting new voters at that time. This has sparked claims of voter fraud, although others dispute that notion. There are suggestions to contact voter protection services and county commissioners to voice complaints about the situation. The discussion revolves around the frustrations of voters and the implications of the line closure.

My wife and I went to vote in Morgan County, where we recently moved. We updated our voter registration, but when we arrived at the precinct, our names weren't in the system. Poll watchers and clerks mentioned they were experiencing more voting issues than ever, affecting both new and long-time residents. We were allowed to vote provisionally, but our names won't be counted in the tally for about a week. This raises concerns about the voting process, especially in a small, predominantly red county in Alabama. What does this mean for voting issues across the country? Let's discuss.

The speaker mentions a strange occurrence where a person named Michael appeared in the voter records, even when the speaker entered their Social Security number. They express confusion and ask for help to understand who made the mistake. Even after re-entering the Social Security number and address, the person in question is still not identified as a woman. The speaker concludes that Michael is likely the driver.

A group of about 12 foreigners arrived to vote. They were assisted by younger individuals to fill out their voter registration forms. Despite facing a two-hour wait, they managed to bypass the line. When one woman approached the voting station, officials couldn't find her name in the system. The group suggested they could change her name to resolve the issue, raising questions about how that could be done.

The scene has been consistent since around 3:30 this afternoon, with people lined up and sitting in chairs. The wait time is approximately three hours, with some individuals reporting they've been in line since 6:20. While some voters have expressed frustration and left rather than wait, many are determined to stay and cast their votes.

I went to vote and found out someone with my exact name and birthday in the same state has already voted. When they scanned my license, it showed I had voted, but I haven't. My name is unique, and the only difference was the address. This seems strange, especially since I'm not registered to vote, which might explain the issue. Overall, it feels sketchy.

My wife and I went to vote in Morgan County after updating our voter registration. Upon arrival, we found our names missing from the system. Poll workers mentioned they were experiencing significant issues with both new and long-time voters. We were allowed to vote provisionally, but our votes won't be counted for several days. This raises concerns about how this might affect the overall voting process. If this is happening in a small, predominantly red county in Alabama, what issues might be occurring nationwide? Let's discuss.

The speaker noticed irregularities with the ballot numbers and names on absentee and mailing ballots. The numbers were almost consecutive, and some envelopes lacked a date. When the speaker questioned this, they were met with resistance. The ballot numbers were all from the same area, with similar signatures and no date stamp. None of these details were entered into the system, and they were being manually entered. The speaker suspected something was amiss but didn't challenge further to avoid being kicked out.

Key points from the testimonies: - There is a contention that ballots were run through the counting process multiple times, possibly thousands, with Speaker 0 noting statements that ballots could have been counted up to 30,000 times. When examining the poll book and comparing it to the votes cast, it is asked whether the numbers would align with the total votes from Detroit. - Speaker 2 asserts that the poll book is "completely off," with Speaker 3 estimating an error of over 100,000 in the poll book. A Downriver resident explains arriving at 3:40 a.m. due to 38,000 ballots that were “ride here” and “sitting over there and getting counted,” framing this as an eye-opening revelation about hypocrisy. - Security measures are described as unusual: Speaker 3 notes that windows are being taped up so challengers cannot see in, or out, raising questions about transparency. - Speaker 4 describes observing that none of the names on ballots were being scanned from the ballots into electronic poll books; instead, names appeared only on supplemental sheets. They note electronic poll books were updated on Sunday, November 1, implying that thousands of new ballots would have had to be registered on November 2 or 3. The speaker began writing down names after ballots were scanned but was obstructed by five individuals, including a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredentialed person, a Democrat challenger, and a top ABCB leader, according to their affidavit. The speaker questions whether 30,000 to 40,000 new voters could have been legally signed up in two days. - Speaker 5 reports ballots that do not belong to anybody and do not appear in voter registration. They describe ballots with no names attached and note attempts to reevaluate them by placing them in a box. Multiple ballots show several different numbers. - Speaker 6 explains that, on the tables, ballots are accompanied by a computer screen showing which ballot it is. Sometimes a ballot has no name, but the registration file shows a person born in 1921 registered long before that year (1900), suggesting anomalies. The speaker asks what is wrong with being born in 1921, while Speaker 5 emphasizes a registration dating to 1900. - Speaker 7 lists egregious items: not allowed to perform duties, GOP challengers obstructed, procedures not followed, backdating ballots from November 4 to November 2, and data entered into computers for mail-in ballots with dates of birth like 01/01/1900, absent from electronic poll books or paper supplement books prior to that. They claim dead people were voting and reference a list of 17,327 Michigan voters over 80 who voted in 2020 and were found in obituaries online. This speaker calls the election described as the most important in their lifetime and in the republic’s history. - Representative Johnson is also mentioned, with a prompt to question the turnout rate, hinting at a purported turnout of 120%. Overall, the testimonies allege discrepancies between poll books and ballots, improper registration, backdated or misdated ballots, ballots lacking identifying information, obstructions to challengers, and possible participation of non-existent or deceased voters, culminating in claims of a highly irregular election process.

I went to vote, but they wouldn't let me. They claimed they didn't understand me because I was speaking English. Then they asked for ID, which I found outrageous. I couldn't believe they would ask for identification. They even said they were going to call the police on me.

Hi, it's Heather with Early Boat Action at Quakertown. A boater here has to leave because of a long wait. They arrived at 3:15 and have been waiting for nearly three hours. The process has changed, and now it's taking about an hour to get their paperwork back. It's their daughter's birthday, and they have dinner reservations in New Jersey, so they can't stay in line. They plan to vote on Tuesday instead and hope the process goes smoothly then. They express appreciation for the staff, praising their professionalism and helpfulness during this experience. They hope to connect again under better circumstances.