TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker notes that there is fear people want Trump to have done something gross with women, but 'I really don't believe wanna be clear. I do not believe that. Yeah. Not covering for Trump. I just don't think that's true.' They insist there is no indication, saying they've spoken to people 'close to Epstein, very close to Epstein, who've told me off camera, in private, no, it's not. Trump never did that shit.' The speaker adds, 'So I don't think it's about that.' They question why 'no one talking to Les Wexner?' and end with 'And' (truncated). The focus remains unclear.

The speaker states they anticipate criticism for their following opinion. They claim that neither Elon Musk nor Donald Trump has ever had consensual sex with a woman, nor sex for which they didn't have to pay, either with money or gifts. The speaker concludes with "Have a great day."

The speaker states they had no involvement with "the disgusting stuff" and blocked the person responsible from their club upon discovery. They question why this person isn't publicly refuting the allegations, asserting there's nothing incriminating about Donald Trump in the files, "as far as I know." The speaker claims to know the contents of the files and insists they contain no damaging information regarding Trump.

The speaker claims that there was a scandal where their campaign was spied on, but the other person disagrees and says there is no evidence. The speaker insists that there is evidence everywhere and wants it to be put on the show. The other person explains that they can't put on unverified information. The speaker continues to assert that their campaign was spied on and that it was caught. They accuse the other person of knowing this but not wanting to acknowledge it. The other person denies knowing anything about it.

My wife's boyfriend, a Trump supporter, has been a source of distress for me. However, with the help of a biased judge, I managed to silence Donald J. Trump. This might lead to my wife ending her relationship with her boyfriend. It was difficult for me to endure her passionate chants of "Make America Great Again" while they were intimate, as I sat in the corner, feeling overwhelmed.

Russia had a moment like Pussy Riot. What do you think of Trump's similar moment? I don't want to comment on that due to the many controversies surrounding the presidential campaign.

I could be a dog catcher and was voted for president twice. But someone interrupts, asking to talk about Jeffrey Epstein and the Lolita Express. The conversation gets interrupted again, but the speaker mentions feeling sad about Arkansas.

The speaker stated that when Hillary Clinton was "caught," he decided not to pursue the matter extensively because she is the ex-wife of a president, and he felt it would be "terrible." He said he "let her off the hook" and is happy he did so.

The speaker defends himself against allegations and claims to have nothing to hide. He offers to release all evidence to prove his innocence. The interviewer brings up the association with Jeffrey Epstein, to which the speaker explains that he and his wife had massages at Epstein's house but denies any wrongdoing. He mentions that many prominent individuals also had massages there and that his friendship with Epstein was purely academic. The speaker argues that having a massage does not make him guilty and that the person making the allegations has admitted to possible mistaken identification. He concludes by stating that he and his wife are innocent.

The speaker defends himself against allegations and claims to have nothing to hide. He offers to release all evidence to prove his innocence. The interviewer brings up the association with Jeffrey Epstein, to which the speaker explains that he and his wife had massages at Epstein's house, but denies any wrongdoing. He mentions that many prominent individuals also had massages there and that his friendship with Epstein was purely academic. The speaker argues that having a massage does not make him guilty and that the person accusing him has admitted to possible mistaken identification. He asserts his innocence and states that neither he nor his wife are guilty.

Pick it out, read it, and answer. Public place, you did it. Is this the best or the worst? The best. Probably the Obama thing. What is your wife talking about? We heard a lot in there. Who should get back in? We're not gonna discuss that. Secret Service, come here. Hi, look at y'all. We're not talking about it. That's an awesome answer. Not the White House. We were not at the White House. He was not elected yet. Anyway, moving on. I'm in trouble now. No, you're good.

The speaker informed President Trump in January 2017 about unverified information alleging he was with prostitutes in a Moscow hotel and that Russians had videotaped it. The speaker did not mention specific details. Trump interrupted and denied the allegation strongly, asking if he looked like someone who needed prostitutes. The interviewer stayed in the Presidential Suite at the Ritz Carlton in Moscow. He asked if anyone from the speaker's office ever investigated the room, and the speaker said no, not while he was director. The interviewer then asked the speaker if he had any questions about the room. The interviewer stated the bedroom is long enough for someone to be at a safe distance from the activity, out of the "splash zone."

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about Donald Trump having his own "pussy riot moment," similar to Russia's. Speaker 1 declines to comment, citing the prevalence of "pussies" around the presidential campaign on both sides and expressing concern about sounding indecent due to English not being their first language.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1, a mother of two daughters, about Trump's "grab them by the pussy" comment. Speaker 0 asks if that language makes Speaker 1 feel that Trump is not her guy. Speaker 1 responds that she would "rather be grabbed by the pussy than have a pussy for president" and that she is happy with that language, claiming everyone uses rude language behind closed doors. She then brings up Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. Speaker 0 reiterates she is talking about the current president-elect, not the past. Speaker 1 says she is not offended by Trump's comments from 8 years ago and tells Speaker 0 to deal with her own issues. Speaker 0 asks if anyone is remotely concerned about the nature of Trump. Speaker 1 responds that America needed someone with a strong lead who would stand up for white and black people, bring back jobs, allow Americans to have weapons, and ensure a conservative Supreme Court. She states that is why pollsters, broadcasters, commentators, and pundits were wrong.

Speaker 0 is being accused of spreading a Russian plan, but this claim is dismissed by both parties and former heads of the CIA. The accusation is considered garbage and not believed by anyone, including Speaker 0's friend Bernie.

Russia had its own pussy riot moment. "What do you think of Donald Trump's pussy riot moment?" "Well, I don't know whether this would English is not my mother tongue, I don't know whether I would sound, I mean, decent." "There are so many pussies around your presidential campaign on both sides that I prefer not to comment about this." "Oh my goodness." "I wasn't expecting that."

What do you want? The Lord caught up with me. How did this happen? I’m facing charges for election subversion, retaining classified information, and payments to an adult film star. I don’t know what to do. Just say it wasn’t you. The feds found my top secret documents on the bathroom floor, and now I’m indicted for election interference. I tried to hide them from what they were about to see. How can I get away with this when they don’t take cash payments?

The speaker states they will be politically incorrect and issues a trigger warning. They question the claim that a wealthy man, married to a supermodel, would sexually assault E. Jean Carroll in a Tiffany's store. The speaker highlights that the alleged incident occurred at the height of the man's career, with no prior accusations for twenty years, and only surfaced when he ran for president. The speaker dismisses the accusation as "complete rubbish and political nonsense."

The speaker states they had no involvement with "the disgusting stuff" and blocked the person in question from their club upon learning about it. They question why this person isn't publicly refuting the allegations. The speaker claims to know the contents of the files and asserts there is nothing incriminating about Donald Trump in them, "as far as I know."

Speaker 0 accuses the man of lying, noting he claims he only ever met him once while they had lived next to him for twenty-some years. Speaker 1 explains that, with his wife present, they apologized, left, and decided they will never be in the room with that disgusting person again—social, business, or philanthropy—because that guy was there. Speaker 0 adds that it’s a disgrace how this guy has a job today, calling him a proven liar advising the president of the United States every day, and says they’re done with these people.

Donald Trump is accused of inappropriate behavior towards women. The speaker finds it disrespectful to women who are victims of rape. They recall a past encounter with Trump involving lingerie. The speaker expresses anger and panic, mentioning death threats. They ponder the possibility of DNA evidence on the lingerie. The conversation shifts to Trump's statement about the accuser not being his type. The speaker challenges the perception of rape as sexy. The discussion pauses briefly.

What if a bomb dropped on your head right now? They disrespected Biden and Obama, but they respected me. Putin went through a lot with me, including a phony witch hunt where they used him and Russia. It was a phony Hunter Biden, Joe Biden scam involving Hillary Clinton and shifty Adam Schiff. It was a Democrat scam, and Putin had to endure it. We didn't end up in a war. He was accused of so much, but he had nothing to do with it. It all came out of Hunter Biden's bathroom and bedroom. They claimed the laptop from hell was made by Russia, but the whole thing was a scam, and Putin had to put up with it. He was wrongly accused of everything.

The speaker defends the use of explicit language by saying that it is common behind closed doors and that real men use even ruder language. They argue that Trump's comments were made in a private conversation years ago and point out the scandals involving Bill Clinton. The other speaker tries to shift the focus to the future and expresses concern about the president-elect's behavior. The first speaker dismisses these concerns and emphasizes the need for a strong leader who will prioritize the interests of all Americans, including white people. They criticize the media and pollsters for underestimating Trump's support.

Speaker 1 mentions ridiculous theories about Melania's statement, joking about a time traveler. They suggest a conspiracy involving the Democratic party using TEMO for a hit. Speaker 0 interrupts, ending the conversation.

The speaker denies that a picture shows someone with Epstein and Maxwell, claiming it's "not even him" and "doesn't even look like him." They assert the face is shorter and the chin is longer, suggesting it's "just some other guy." The speaker questions the nature of the relationship depicted. They mention someone ran away and accused them of not doing research about Mark Carney, and that his dog defecated without the waste being cleaned up.