TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Tomorrow, all of the Kennedy files will be released. People have been waiting decades for this release. Tulsi Gabbard and others were responsible for putting the files together.

They claim that the execution of the president was ordered by the policy committee of the Bilderberg Group in The Hague in Geneva, Switzerland, and was carried out by agents of the secret government in Dallas. The man who actually administered the coup de grace was the driver of the car, William Greer. They assert that Greer turned with an assassination pistol in his left hand and shot the president point blank in the head over his right shoulder. They reference a film in beautiful living color that allegedly shows this with your own eyes. They assert that you can see in the film that Greer fired the shot. They claim it is the Zupruder film, and that it was incredible that the event had been hidden from the public for all these years, but that the same film has been shown on television for all these years, yet they say television has always zoomed in on Kennedy and cut the driver out so you can never see it. They state that the Zupruder film was never shown to the Warren Commission and that they never saw it. In summary, the assertion is that the assassination was ordered by a high-level policy group and executed by secret-government-backed agents, with William Greer as the shooter, captured in a living-color film that has been publicly broadcast in a distorted way, and that this critical footage was never presented to the Warren Commission.

In this video, the speaker discusses the JFK documents and the role of ODNI in blocking their release. They interview Richard Grenell, the former head of ODNI, who claims there is nothing significant in the documents. The speaker questions why the documents are still being withheld and suggests that Grenell may be compromised or misinformed. They also mention Tucker Carlson's reporting on J. Edgar Hoover's involvement in spreading disinformation about the JFK assassination. The speaker calls for accountability and urges viewers to question their leaders. The video ends with a reminder that democracy relies on holding leaders accountable.

There is doubt that the newly released JFK files contain any revelatory information. The speaker believes there was not a single gunman. The magic bullet theory is dismissed as impossible. The speaker states that everybody heard a shot from the grassy knoll. It is unlikely the full truth will ever be known because this was the final news dump. The speaker doubts the CIA will ever admit involvement, even though a lot of people wanted them to be involved.

Speaker 0: Did you hear Trump's take on the JFK assassination, why he didn't release the files? Yeah. I know what Trump's take is. He said that if you knew what I know, you wouldn't tell people either, which is crazy. Well, and What does that mean? That's his position on the UAP thing as well Yeah. Actually. And that's a lot of people's position on it. I mean, you know, Trump is saying, of course, the CIA had knowledge of it. That is known. I mean, I mean, the whole it sounds like it's so funny. There's so many levels and there's so much I don't understand. But the whole JFK conspiracy industry, and it really is an industry, more books written on that than almost any historical topic, is is filled with wackos. Right? There are a lot of wackos in there. But it obscures that fact obscures the larger fact which is the facts themselves tell an unbelievable story. Yeah. And so whatever. I could get into it at great length. But yeah. Yeah. They're they're still classifying documents sixty one years later. Both Trump and Joe Biden have, in violation of my read of federal law, kept those documents secret. There's no living person connected to the Kennedy assassination. It was a couple generations ago. There's no one person whose whose secrets are being protected. It's an institution or maybe countries. There may have been countries involved too. I mean, don't know the answer, but there's clearly something worth protecting. And I know that when I I spoke to someone who'd seen the documents, okay, two years ago and I got I got one fact out of him, which is, yes, the CIA was involved. And by CIA, CIA is a huge organization, but James Jesus Angleton, the head of the operations directorate, had knowledge of this, which I think is well known. But that that's the view of someone who saw the documents. So I thought that was news, so I went on TV and said that. The next day, I'll never forget it, I went quail hunting, and I was driving back and I got a phone call from Mike Pompeo's lawyer. Mike Pompeo was the Secretary of State, but before then he was the Director of the CIA. And in that position, he plotted the murder of Julian Assange, so he is a criminal as far as I'm concerned. But his lawyer called me and said, you know, you should know that anyone who tells you the contents of classified documents has committed a crime. He's threatening me. It's in my car. I'll never with my dog sitting next to me. I'll never forget this. And I said, are you really saying that to reveal that the US government had a role in the murder of a democratically elected president to say that out loud, that's the crime? What about the actual crime which is murdering a president? Like, you're covering up for that, Mike Pompeo. He had no no response at all. And so Mike Pompeo is the one who pressed Trump to keep those documents secret. And so it's like, what's crazy to me is not just that Pompeo did that. I think Pompeo was a really sinister person and a and a criminal. I think that. I think that because the facts suggest that. He was caught. Yahoo News, Mike Issachoff wrote a long piece on this several years ago. His employees went to Mike Issachoff and said, hey. Mike Pompeo was plotting to murder Julian Assange who's never even been charged with a crime in The United States as CIA director. That's illegal. You're not allowed federal employees are not allowed to just kill people they don't like. Okay? Just to set the baseline here. So that's who Mike Pompeo is, but he somehow intimidated Trump into not releasing this. Well, okay. That's all bad. Right? I think it's criminal behavior. What's crazy is how Mike Pompeo is treated. He's treated as like a republican pooh bah in good standing. He fully expects to become the secretary of defense in a Trump administration, which is like completely insane. Why would you get criminal and give him nuclear weapons? Okay. That's my view. I think it's a common sense view. And like he goes to fundraisers and dinners and everyone's like, hey, Mike Pompeo. It's like, no. You're the guy who kept information the public has right to know secret. You're the guy who plotted the murder of someone who committed no crime. You are the outlaw. You are the bad guy. But no. He's treated as like, you know, like a pillar of republican Washington. I think that's I think it's mind bending to watch that.

Speaker 1, a government official, expresses dedication to uncovering the truth about historical cover-ups, particularly regarding the JFK assassination. They express distrust in agencies like the FBI and emphasize the importance of transparency. They hope for the release of all relevant documents to the public. The speaker questions the motives behind past cover-ups and stresses the need for full honesty and accountability.

The speakers discuss the need for transparency regarding the January 6th events at the Capitol. They express concern about withheld videos showing violence and call for their release to the public. They believe the government is hiding the truth, comparing it to the Kennedy assassination. They mention instances of police brutality and the deaths of Roseanne Boylan and Ashley Babbitt. They argue that the truth will eventually emerge and emphasize the importance of allowing the public and media to objectively assess the evidence. They assert that democracy requires knowing what happened and appreciate efforts to uncover the truth.

The speaker is part of a senate bipartisan investigation into an assassination attempt. According to the speaker, the Secret Service and FBI are dragging their feet and not providing requested documents, such as 302s and interview transcriptions. Documents that are provided are heavily redacted and delivered the day of the interview, making them unusable. The speaker believes this behavior is suspicious and fuels conspiracy theories. They claim releasing the body for cremation before autopsy or toxicology reports further drives suspicion and conspiracy theories.

After a thorough investigation into the John F. Kennedy assassination, the initial congressional hearing was flawed regarding the single bullet theory. I believe there were two shooters. Hopefully, we can gain access to the SCIF before the files are released to the public to find more information.

The discussion shifts to the JFK assassination following news coverage of released documents. One revelation discussed is that James Angleton, the CIA counterintelligence chief, used Israelis to monitor Lee Harvey Oswald prior to the assassination. JFK was allegedly concerned with Israel acquiring nuclear weapons in the summer of 1963, and sent letters to David Ben-Gurion demanding inspections. Ben-Gurion resigned when pressed on the issue. The speaker asks if the current administration will acknowledge Israel's nuclear arsenal. The response states that 80,000 pages of unredacted records related to the Kennedy assassination have been released by order of President Trump, and that this is all the material. There will be no comment on speculation or conspiracy theories about the assassination.

In 1992, Congress passed the JFK Records Act, mandating the release of all records related to the assassination unless national security was at risk. The Assassination Records Review Board tried to get records released until 1998, but the CIA did not cooperate, claiming national security concerns. The speaker claims the CIA has revealed nothing of importance, despite evidence of illegal activities in foreign policy. The speaker asks the committee to reopen the investigation into President Kennedy's assassination, citing issues with the Warren Commission's findings. The speaker calls for reinvestigation of the crime scene, chain of custody of evidence, and Lee Harvey Oswald's connections to intelligence agencies. The speaker demands a true interrogation of the CIA, whose "muddy footprints" are all over the case. Quoting CIA member James Angleton, the speaker suggests some CIA members deserve to "end up in hell." The speaker concludes by saying the presidency belongs to the people and asks to be treated with respect.

The discussion shifts to the JFK assassination following the release of unredacted records ordered by President Trump. One revelation discussed is that James Angleton, the CIA counterintelligence chief, used Israelis as part of his intelligence gathering, including monitoring Lee Harvey Oswald prior to the assassination. Oswald was reportedly under surveillance for four years, from 1959 to 1963, with new documents pointing to an Israeli connection. JFK was allegedly concerned with Israel acquiring nuclear weapons in the summer of 1963 and sent letters to Ben Gurion demanding inspections. Ben Gurion resigned when pressed on the issue, and JFK was assassinated in November. The speaker states that 80,000 pages of unredacted records related to the Kennedy assassination are currently being released and that this is all the material. The speaker declines to comment on speculation and conspiracy theories about the assassination.

Speaker discusses Trump’s stance on JFK assassination files, saying Trump claimed that if you knew what I know, you wouldn’t tell people either, and notes that this is his position on UAP as well. He asserts that the CIA had knowledge of the JFK matter and that the conspiracy industry around JFK is an industry with many wackos, but emphasizes that the facts themselves tell an unbelievable story. He mentions that documents are still classified sixty-one years later and argues that both Trump and Joe Biden have kept those documents secret in violation of his reading of federal law. He states there is no living person connected to the Kennedy assassination, only an institution or possibly countries involved, and indicates there may be something worth protecting. He relays a conversation with someone who had seen the documents two years earlier, from whom he learned that yes, the CIA was involved, and notes James Jesus Angleton, head of the operations directorate, had knowledge of this. He says this was news to him and he discussed it on TV. The next day, while quail hunting, he received a phone call from Mike Pompeo’s lawyer, who, as then-CIA director and later Secretary of State, had plotted the murder of Julian Assange. The lawyer told him that anyone who reveals contents of classified documents has committed a crime, and the speaker recalls driving with his dog and asks if revealing that the U.S. government had a role in the murder of a democratically elected president constitutes the crime, while suggesting Pompeo is protecting the murder. The speaker says Pompeo had no response. The speaker asserts Pompeo pressed Trump to keep the documents secret and calls Pompeo sinister and criminal, citing that Pompeo was caught—referencing Yahoo News, Mike Issachoff’s piece—where Issachoff’s sources claimed Pompeo was plotting to murder Julian Assange, who had not been charged in the U.S. as CIA director. He states federal employees are not allowed to kill people they don’t like. He contends Pompeo pressured Trump to withhold information the public has a right to know and that Pompeo plotted the murder of someone who committed no crime. Finally, the speaker questions how Pompeo is treated in Republican Washington, noting he is treated as a respected figure and potential secretary of defense in a Trump administration, despite being described as criminal for keeping information secret and for plotting a murder. He finds it mind-bending that Pompeo is treated as a pillar of Republican Washington.

There is active pressure on elected officials to stop the disclosure of information, specifically regarding the JFK assassination. The source of this pressure is unknown, but it is not believed to be the CIA or John Ratcliffe. The question is posed: who is powerful enough to scare people into slow-walking disclosure, which is the same as preventing it? The purpose of this slow-walking is to continue hiding facts. It is questioned what force is acting on the US government and the new administration to prevent disclosure, especially considering the assassination of a president undermines democracy. Getting to the bottom of the JFK situation is deemed very important.

President John F. Kennedy was not killed by Lee Harvey Oswald. He was assassinated by Jews and their lackeys in the U.S. government and the CIA. The truth is evident despite attempts to hide it, with breadcrumbs leading to Jews and Israel, who are also supposedly behind 9/11 and the "scandemic." The release of JFK files by the Trump administration has revealed the role of Israel and the Jews in this assassination. The CIA ordered the U.S. government to erase any mention of Israel from the JFK files before releasing them. The released files show stamps from the CIA censoring sections mentioning Israel and Jews.

Today marks a new era of transparency in America with the creation of a House Oversight task force dedicated to declassifying federal secrets. Building on President Trump's executive order, our mission is to address the American people's reasonable questions about what their government is hiding. I'm honored to lead this task force, and we'll investigate the assassinations of JFK, RFK, and MLK, UAPs, USOs, the Epstein client list, the origins of COVID-19, and the 9/11 files. Our first hearing is set for March, focusing on the JFK assassination. We aim to cut through bureaucracy and stonewalling to deliver the truth the American people deserve. Trust through transparency begins now.

The speaker discusses the conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination of John F. Kennedy. They mention Rob Reiner's claim that JFK was shot by four shooters and question the official investigation. They also mention a CIA agent who confirmed the CIA's involvement in the assassination. The speaker highlights the lack of trust in the government and the existence of powerful forces within the US government that are beyond democratic control. They mention a Secret Service agent's account that challenges the lone gunman theory. The speaker concludes by calling for truth and honesty in the matter.

The speaker, initially uninterested in the JFK assassination due to its association with conspiracy theories, has since learned enough to believe "there's something actually there." Trump issued an executive order to release files on the JFK, Bobby Kennedy, and MLK assassinations, but the files have not been released. The speaker believes the CIA was involved in some way, but doesn't think protecting the CIA is the reason for the delay, especially after the Church Committee hearings. The speaker questions who is being protected and if a foreign government is involved, stating there is active pressure on elected officials to stop the disclosure. The speaker questions who is powerful enough to scare people into slow-walking the disclosure, as slow-walking the disclosure is the same as not providing the disclosure. The speaker believes it's important to get to the bottom of the JFK assassination.

The speaker discusses the JFK documents and the role of ODNI in blocking their release. They interview Richard Grenell, former head of ODNI, who claims there is nothing significant in the documents. The speaker questions why the documents are still being withheld and suggests that Grenell may be compromised or misinformed. They also mention Tucker Carlson's reporting on J. Edgar Hoover's involvement in spreading disinformation about the JFK assassination. The speaker emphasizes the importance of holding leaders accountable for their lies.

The discussion centers on newly declassified CIA files and old JFK assassination records, with a key claim that Israel was involved in JFK’s assassination. The main points asserted are: - CIA files allegedly show that James Arlington, a top CIA officer, had connections to Israel intelligence and subverted President Kennedy’s policy to prevent Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons. Arlington was praised by Mossad head Emmett as “the biggest Zionist of them all.” - Arlington allegedly hid documents from the Warren Commission about the Kennedy assassination. Shortly before his death, Arlington purportedly stated, “the better you lied and the more you betrayed, the more likely you would have been promoted.” The file, previously released in 02/17/18 and 2022 in redacted form, is now unredacted. - The material is presented as proof that “Israel assassinated JFK,” and the speaker expresses disbelief about why Israel would act this way. - In a separate thread, Speaker 1 discusses anti-Semitism online, plans to battle it, and proposes creating a division within the State Department to handle technology and revamp the office to be highly prominent. - Speaker 2 questions how a US official could advocate censorship of citizens, arguing that it would be illegal and contrasting it with free speech. References are made to the Biden administration, the US government, and the potential firing of an official for statements. - Speaker 0 returns to a broader claim that American citizens are losing their First Amendment rights to expose truths about Israel. The argument is that exposing such truths would provoke a countrywide revolt, and a critique is leveled at those who would silence speech. The speaker urges compliance as a way to avoid tyranny, suggesting that “you’re gonna pass this burden … onto your children,” and concludes with “Trust me. You can comply your way out of tyranny.” Overall, the transcript juxtaposes declassified material and theories about Israel’s involvement in JFK’s assassination with discussions about censorship, speech rights, and governmental efforts to regulate or revamp technology-related oversight in the State Department, all framed by a provocative stance on silencing discourse about Israel.

Our first investigation will be announced soon and will cover a thorough investigation into the John F. Kennedy assassination. Based on what I've seen so far, the initial hearing held in Congress was faulty regarding the single bullet theory. I believe that there were two shooters, and we should find more information as we gain access to the SCIF, hopefully before the files are released to the public.

There is active pressure on elected officials to stop the disclosure of information, specifically regarding the JFK assassination. It is unknown who is exerting this pressure, but the speaker does not believe it is the CIA or John Ratcliffe. The speaker questions who is powerful enough to scare people into slow-walking disclosure, which they equate to preventing disclosure altogether. The speaker believes it is a fair question to ask what force is acting on the US government to prevent disclosure, especially considering the gravity of a president's assassination. Getting to the bottom of the JFK situation is considered very important.

The discussion shifts to the JFK assassination following the release of unredacted records ordered by President Trump. One person states that Jefferson Morley of JFK facts analyzed the released documents on Bill O'Reilly's show, revealing that James Angleton, the CIA counterintelligence chief, used Israelis to monitor Lee Harvey Oswald for four years prior to the assassination. They add that JFK was concerned with Israel acquiring nuclear weapons in 1963, demanding inspections from Ben Gurion, who then resigned. The speaker asks if the current administration will acknowledge Israel's nuclear arsenal. Speaker 0 confirms the release of 80,000 pages of unredacted records related to the Kennedy assassination and states that all material is now available. They decline to comment on speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination.

There is active pressure on elected officials to stop the disclosure of information, specifically regarding the JFK assassination. The source of this pressure is unknown, but it is not believed to be the CIA or John Ratcliffe. The question is, who is powerful enough to scare people into slow-walking disclosure, which is the same as preventing it? The purpose of this slow-walking is to continue hiding facts. What force is acting on the US government and the new administration to prevent disclosure? It is a fair question because the president of the United States was murdered, which overturned the vote of the people. It is important to get to the bottom of the JFK assassination.