reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 1 discusses Christopher Krebs, former head of CISA, claiming: Krebs weaponized his position against free speech in the election context and in the context of the COVID-19 presidential memorandum, and that he might have instructed the Department of Justice and other parts of government to investigate what Krebs participated in while head of CISA. Speaker 1 asserts they did not know Krebs personally, but that he came out right after the election, which was a “rigged election, badly rigged election.” He claims the country’s outcomes included open borders and millions entering the country, and asserts that “Russia and Ukraine, that would have never happened,” and that “October 7 would have never happened,” followed by the Afghanistan withdrawal with “13 dead, but so many killed, actually. I mean, so many so many killed outside of the 13 soldiers, hundreds of people killed.” He says, “and maybe, I don’t know, never,” but mentions it, that Krebs was saying the election was great, adding that “it’s been proven that it was not only not great.” He cites lawyers and law firms signing on, “giving us hundreds of millions of dollars,” and claims the election was proven by legislatures not approving, and other forms from “the all of the different, scamming operations,” describing it as a very corrupt election in which COVID was used to cheat. Speaker 1 contends Krebs claimed, “we’ve proved this is the most secure election in the history of our country,” describing the result as a disaster. He insists they should adopt “paper ballots, same day voting, voter ID,” and proposes adding a certificate showing citizenship before voting—“a citizen piece of paper that says you’re a citizen before you can vote.” He reiterates support for voter ID, paper ballots, and same-day voting. He describes events: if you don’t have same-day voting, they change the air, move boxes, and then don’t bring the boxes back, implying a lack of safety in elections. He asserts that elections must have borders and, ideally, a free press, which he claims we do not have, calling the press dishonest. Speaker 1 concludes that Krebs is a “fraud” and a “disgrace,” and says, “We’ll find out whether or not he was right,” promising that Krebs “has a big price to pay” if the election wasn’t safe, labeling Krebs as “a bad guy.” He also states he has no idea who Krebs is, though acknowledges Krebs “was in the room at some point,” and ends by noting that the last two points are important for the country.

The speaker criticizes the lack of action against those who cheated in the election, focusing instead on targeting those who report or question the cheating. They claim that this will be remembered as a bigger disgrace than the Russia hoax. The speaker emphasizes the importance of honest elections and strong borders, stating that without them, there is no country. Currently, they believe that the country is lacking in these aspects.

The speaker expressed shock at the level of ignorance and misinformation displayed regarding democracy. As a former civics teacher, the speaker was pained listening to some individuals and believes there's a need to invest more in civics education. The speaker found it disgusting that they had to receive an education on democracy and democratic values from two convicted felons. The speaker asserted that the election must have order and that the election office is top notch, referencing Al Schmidt's similar sentiment. The speaker urged everyone to educate themselves on the process and then made a motion to adjourn.

The speaker expresses disappointment in the corruption and rot within the FBI and DOJ, stating that no amount of face paint or whitewashing can fix it. They argue that the accuracy and veracity of various documents and reports were irrelevant to the FBI's identification of Donald Trump as a public enemy. The purpose of the investigation was not to prove Russian collusion, but to destroy Trump's presidency. The speaker believes that this corruption has destroyed America's faith in institutions and eroded the justice system. They question how long the country can survive under a two-tiered system of justice. The witness, Mr. Durham, responds that the nation cannot stand under those circumstances.

They stopped counting votes on election night to determine how many mail-in ballots to add, which the speaker believes was fraudulent. The speaker insists it was a planned event, claiming it wouldn't happen in Texas. They express concern over the authenticity of mail-in ballots and assert that anyone could have filled them out. The other person questions the validity of these claims, but the speaker stands by their belief based on personal experience.

The speaker claims the Obama campaign spied on their campaign and was caught red-handed, possibly committing treason. They allege this has never happened before, or at least no one has been caught. The speaker believes spying occurred and that President Obama, Joe Biden, Comey, Brennan, Clapper, and Lisa Page all knew about it. They claim to have documented evidence in texts and other forms. The speaker describes this as a terrible act that should never happen again to a president and calls it a setup and a political crime of the century. They await the consequences for those involved.

The speaker expresses concern over the 4.8 million votes cast in the election and suggests that it could have been manipulated. They believe that the same issues occurred in various communities, regardless of size, and that it was an organized crime involving dirty voter rolls, ballot boxes, and mail-in ballots. The speaker claims to have spent the last 15 months developing these findings and concludes that it was an organized crime committed against Americans.

Christopher Krebs, the former head of CISA, is described as having weaponized his position against free speech in the election context and in relation to a presidential memorandum involving the Department of Justice and other areas of government to investigate some “malign acts” he participated in while at CISA. The other speaker responds, saying he does not know Krebs well, but notes Krebs appeared after the election and characterizes the election as rigged. He asserts the country’s problems followed from that election, including open borders with millions entering the country, and references broader geopolitical and security events such as Russia and Ukraine, the October 7 incident, and Afghanistan, describing the withdrawal as resulting in 13 dead and many others killed and injured. He contends Krebs claimed the election was great, but he argues it was not, citing lawsuits and lawyers signing hundreds of millions of dollars in support, and claims that legislative processes and various schemes demonstrated a corrupt election where COVID was used to cheat. The speaker claims that Krebs asserted the election was the most secure in history, which he calls a disaster. He advocates for paper ballots, same-day voting, voter ID, and a citizen certificate or piece of paper proving citizenship prior to voting. He argues for voter ID, paper ballots, and same-day voting, and claims that delays in ballot boxes and air-conditioning changes affected election processes. The speaker asserts that the election was not safe and that the press has been dishonest, describing the press as not free. The speaker adds that Krebs sat back as a member who appeared to be a Republican and claimed the election was safe from the start, but the speaker believes daily papers report increasing fraud. He states that Krebs is a fraud and a disgrace and asserts there will be an investigation into whether Krebs was right, with Krebs facing consequences if the election was not safe. He concludes that Krebs is a bad guy. The final remark notes that the last two points are very important for the country, emphasizing the questions around Krebs’s role and the integrity of the election, and indicating a determination to determine whether Krebs was correct about the election’s safety.

A woman yelled at the speaker, accusing them of implanting things in her and tracking her. The speaker is surprised by the misinformation and the difficulty in trusting the government and collaborating with it. They advise the younger generation to pay attention to and reverse these trends, emphasizing their importance.

Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden are accused of corruption and law-breaking. Biden has learned from Obama and Clinton that liberal Democrats are not prosecuted. They also learned from Donald Trump, an outsider who challenged the system. The corrupt machine is now making a desperate effort to destroy their most dangerous opponent. Speaker 1 claims to be the victim of a witch hunt and ridiculous indictments, with the intention of interfering in the upcoming election. They believe they are the only one who can stop their enemies and protect freedom. The speaker urges people to save the country in the 2024 election.

The speaker expresses concern about the increasing politicization of the DOJ and FBI, stating that it has led to a dangerous accumulation of power. They assert that this cycle of power and politics needs to be halted. The speaker then accuses Christopher Wray and Mary Garland, the leaders of the FBI and DOJ respectively, of corruption, claiming that this is a widely known fact among the American people.

The speaker expresses frustration and accuses the person they are speaking to of protecting the Bidens. They criticize the FBI for lack of transparency and trustworthiness, comparing it unfavorably to the past. The speaker accuses the person of whitewashing corrupt conduct and concludes by stating that the people who work for the FBI deserve better than them.

Biden consistently received high numbers of votes while Trump received none, which the speaker deems statistically impossible. They claim that the Secretary of State should be aware of this incorrect information, as it has been publicly available for months. The speaker challenges the media and anyone who denies the existence of election fraud, stating that there is evidence and those who claim otherwise are lying.

The speaker asserts that fraudsters complain the loudest and with fake righteous indignation, calling it a tell. They cite a striking example: $2,000,000,000 awarded from the federal government to Stacey Abrams’ NGO, which the speaker says basically didn’t exist. They question, “Why?” and note that there are many such cases like that.

The speaker expresses admiration for the opening monologue and finds it incredible. They are perplexed by the lack of action taken despite hearing such things. They believe that if regular individuals were involved in similar actions, they would face severe consequences. They consider the actions of the president, vice president, and others to be treasonous, surpassing mere theft. The speaker recalls their time in the military when treason was a serious offense.

The speaker states that the deception went beyond a campaign, involving the sitting President of the United States. They suggest the country was potentially at risk due to the president's impairment, and people were aware of it while publicly denying it. The speaker questions who was making decisions on behalf of the country behind the scenes. They emphasize the importance of understanding why this happened and assert that the situation cannot be ignored.

The speaker says the fraudsters complain the loudest and with fake righteous indignation, and that is a tell. They describe these people as crazy. They point to examples like the $2,000,000,000 to Stacey Abrams’ NGO that basically didn’t exist and suddenly gets $2,000,000,000 awarded from the federal government. She asks, why? and notes that there are many such cases like that.

The speaker suggests that the American public questions why certain things are being concealed. They compare it to the ongoing cover-up of the Kennedy assassination, which they believe is unnecessary since it has been over 50 years and everyone involved is deceased. The speaker believes that the current state of the country is driven by power, control, money, greed, and corruption, which they find disgraceful.

The speaker expresses concern about the fear people have of their own government and criticizes the Department of Justice for their handling of investigations. They mention the Durham report and the slow progress on investigations related to Hillary Clinton and Hunter Biden. The speaker also raises concerns about corruption in the Obama administration and the lack of action from the Biden administration. They believe that the Department of Justice is covering up information and allowing foreign propaganda to influence the country. The speaker concludes by asking if the Department of Justice believes that only eligible US citizens should be voting in elections.

The speaker accuses certain individuals of being malicious and trying to make people hate Donald Trump. They argue that these individuals control the information people receive and deny them the ability to make their own decisions. The speaker believes that the election was rigged, claiming that corona was used as an excuse to manipulate the voting process. They describe how the counting of votes was halted overnight, and when it resumed, Joe Biden suddenly had a significant lead. The speaker expresses frustration and disbelief at these events, questioning how it could be possible.

The speaker claims to have found documents related to Jim Comey that were not where they should have been. The speaker says these documents are unflattering to Comey. The speaker asserts that Comey disgraced the FBI numerous times with his role in crossfire hurricane and other abominations. The speaker finds it stunning that Comey continues to attack their leadership when they are cleaning up the mess Comey created and continue to find things from his era.

The speaker accuses Christopher Krebs, former head of CISA, of weaponizing his position against free speech during the election and COVID-19. The speaker suggests Krebs may have participated in malign acts while at CISA, warranting investigation. The speaker claims the 2020 election was rigged and blames it for open borders, the Russia-Ukraine war, and the Afghanistan withdrawal. The speaker disputes Krebs' claim that the election was secure, citing lawyers, legislatures, and "scamming operations" as evidence of corruption and the use of COVID to cheat. The speaker advocates for paper ballots, same-day voting, voter ID, and proof of citizenship to ensure safe elections. The speaker criticizes the press and insists Krebs is a "disgrace" who will "pay a big price" if the election wasn't safe. The speaker denies knowing Krebs.

The speaker believes Donald Trump will win the election, regardless of personal preference. They claim the "vibe shift" is profound, with numbers and early voting favoring Trump. More importantly, there's a return to freedom of expression. The speaker asserts that the previous election was rigged because critical information about a candidate was hidden from the public. They believe this cannot happen again, regardless of what actions are taken in the coming weeks. The speaker suggests people will not accept claims of popularity for figures like Kamala Harris, whom they criticize for lacking job experience and inconsistent pronunciation of her name. They also express frustration with someone raised in Montreal lecturing them about America. The speaker concludes that people have had enough.

When questioning the events of January 6th, it became clear that there were lies being told. The speaker believes the media should be ashamed for covering up these lies. They argue that the actions of certain individuals, like Jacob Chansley, were not insurrectionist and should not have resulted in imprisonment. The speaker expresses anger at the lack of remorse shown by those responsible for the false narrative surrounding January 6th.

The speaker contends that the war is a conflict that should never have begun and attributes its initiation to the 2020 US presidential election being rigged. They assert that the war would not have started if that election had not been rigged. They declare that it was a rigged election and assert that “Everybody now knows that. They found out.” The speaker further states that “People will soon be prosecuted for what they did.” They describe the situation as breaking news, though they add that it should be breaking news as well. The speaker reiterates that “Those are rigged elections.”