reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the use of sock puppets on Twitter and Facebook, as well as defensive and offensive tactics employed by anti-disinformation operatives. They mention techniques like doxxing and deception, and the use of merchandise sites to gather information. The speaker also talks about checking potentially malicious content sites, takedowns, and ensuring machine security.

John McAfee explains that using Gmail for email provides privacy, or rather a lack of it, despite people believing in encrypted systems like ProtonMail or encrypted messaging like Signal. He argues that encryption was designed thirty-five years ago to prevent a man-in-the-middle attack between transmission and receipt, but there is no longer a need for such protection because there is no man in the middle anymore. He states that smartphones are the surveillance devices preferred by governments worldwide and that malware installation is easy to accomplish. McAfee claims that visiting Pornhub can result in someone listening to you, because a drive-by of a website can set the download of unauthorized applications as a flag. He asserts that with the first click, malware can be installed, and this malware can both watch inputs before they are encrypted and read outputs after they are encrypted. He concludes that encryption is a worthless piece of shit and old technology marketed as a safe system. He emphasizes that there is no safety and no privacy anymore. He explains his personal choice of Gmail for one reason: Gmail is the last company that requires a government subpoena to provide information, and their lawyers have thirty days to review the subpoena. He says that thirty days is enough for him, and that he changes his email every fifteen days. He urges the audience to wake up, stating that there is no more privacy and that people are being sold a useless bill of goods with encryption. Thank you for listening.

The disinformation industry distorts reality with online propaganda. Hanan's team boasts about past successes, with tools like AIMS to weaponize social media. Their bots are sophisticated, appearing human with multiple platform accounts. They create fake personas for various purposes. The team claims to have worked in countries worldwide and can hack Telegram and Gmail. Hanan exploits vulnerabilities in the global signaling system, SS7.

Good morning. John McAfee here. Let’s talk about privacy. If you think encrypted systems like ProtonMail or Signal offer you privacy, you’re mistaken. Encryption was designed to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks, but that’s no longer the issue. Your smartphone is the primary surveillance tool for governments worldwide. Malware can easily be installed just by visiting certain websites, allowing attackers to monitor your inputs and outputs, rendering encryption ineffective. I use Gmail because it requires a subpoena for information, giving their lawyers 30 days to review it. That’s enough time for me to change my email frequently. Wake up—privacy is a myth, and encryption is outdated technology being falsely marketed as safe. Thank you for listening.

In China, a method is described for making social media posts appear to generate widespread attention. The technique involves flipping a switch and having one monitor display a collage of many phone screens at once. The setup is built from ordinary smartphones, and assembling it is portrayed as easier than one might expect. The process begins by stripping the phones down to their circuit boards, after which the components are gathered in a single location. The boards are then connected to power and internet access. With the appropriate software, this arrangement can operate a large number of phones simultaneously. Once running, the system is capable of controlling dozens of phones at the same time. This multi-phone control enables the creation of multiple accounts and the artificial boosting of engagement metrics. In practice, the setup can be used to inflate activity on social media by generating more likes and follows than would occur naturally. The description emphasizes that the trick relies on a coordinated, large-scale use of decoupled devices—reconfigured and networked together—to simulate genuine user behavior across many accounts. The core claim is that the combination of hardware (a network of converted smartphones) and software (that coordinates and automates actions across the devices) can mimic organic activity and amplify posts. The technique is framed as an efficient way to amplify reach, leveraging the visual effect of many screens and the automation potential of software to manage numerous accounts in parallel. The discussion highlights that the setup makes it possible to run dozens of phones at once, implying scalability and ease of deployment beyond a small pilot. Overall, the described approach centers on transforming standard smartphones into a coordinated, scalable system for artificial engagement, enabling the rapid creation of multiple accounts and the systematic boosting of likes and followers on social media posts. The emphasis is on the practical steps to repurpose ordinary devices, the centralized hardware arrangement, and the software-driven control that drives mass-like activity.

The speaker advocates downsizing all assets and resources, especially for public figures who are fighting a public battle and have a social media presence. The key goal is to maintain anonymity by moving wealth into Bitcoin so others cannot know you have it. Keeping funds on centralized exchanges or in a nameable account makes them visible and traceable, which the speaker warns against. The recommended strategy is to transfer wealth into Bitcoin and ensure it remains untraceable by using cold storage in an air-gapped, multisignature wallet. The idea is that once funds are in Bitcoin, they effectively disappear from scrutiny and cannot be proven to belong to you if properly secured. To implement this, one should convert assets into Bitcoin and transfer them to a cold storage setup that uses air-gapped security and multisig authorization. The speaker emphasizes the risk of losing access by keeping assets in traditional, monitored locations; specifically, if you leave Bitcoin on a centralized exchange, it can be seen and tied to you. Finally, the speaker notes a harsh consequence: if you conduct this process and then lose the private keys, you lose all the Bitcoin. In other words, the method hinges on secure, private control of keys, and the trade-off is the possibility of total loss if the keys are misplaced.

In this video, the speaker talks about the importance of security and the tools that can help in the process. They mention compartmentalization as a way to separate personal and work life. They also emphasize the use of a persona as a disguise for research purposes. The goal is to lock down information to contain any potential impact. If something goes wrong, only the persona would be compromised. Overall, the speaker finds this topic very interesting.

The transcript argues that a group aligned with Peter Thiel and “tech oligarchs” is pushing to “turn the US government into a private corporation.” It says the country is “technically already” run as a multinational corporation, and that the goal is to formalize this into a national CEO system described as a dictator-style structure. The names “sovcorp” (“sovereign corporation”) or “govcorp” (“governing corporation”) are cited for this concept. It claims Palantir is being set up as a “beta A test” for that transformation. The transcript says Palantir has been handed the military and “our entire intelligence community,” and that under the current iteration of Trump it has also been handed “all of our agricultural data,” “all of our healthcare data,” and “IRS” data, presenting this as an expansion to “total” control. The transcript connects this to alleged ideological alignment between Palantir’s leadership and people who want “one company to replace the governing structure of the country,” stating this is “extremely concerning.” It further claims the New York Times says Palantir “knows already know everything about you,” characterizing Palantir as the “one-seeing eye,” and referencing “total information awareness” described as a “pyramid with the beam covering the earth.” It concludes that independent media publishes data “with the hope that people will wake up and do something about it,” but advises viewers who are concerned to “starve them of your data as much as possible.” The transcript identifies getting rid of a smartphone as the “most powerful thing,” while also saying that if a person “really need[s] one,” they can use alternatives, and that they “don’t need to have an Android or an Apple device on you.” It emphasizes that smartphones generate the most data for Palantir and says the plan fails if people “mass non-comply.”

The speaker says they have no Wi‑Fi, no Bluetooth, and no wireless devices in their house, arguing that people do not have to have wireless technology “pinging microwaves” throughout their home. They note that someone will object by saying it’s “not microwaves,” then respond by citing a book called *The Zapping of America* and a book described as *Microwaves and the Deadly Risk*, written by Paul B. Brodeur. The speaker claims the book explains how microwave technology was “created by Raytheon,” including “the first cell phone created by Raytheon” and “the first wireless technology created by Raytheon.” They further claim that the Department of Defense, described as “Raytheon,” wants people to have wireless technology in their house because it not only “cooks them” and causes health issues (they list autoimmune, “lots of smell, lots of taste, dizziness, brain fog”), but also because wireless technology allows people “to watch the people.” They state that when you have wireless, “people can see what’s in the house.” The speaker concludes by saying *The Sapping of America* by Paul Brodeur is recommended and adds that Brodeur is “a Frenchman,” encouraging viewers to look into the books.

Trevor Coppola and Deborah Tavares discuss a NASA “war document” found on NASA’s website, emphasizing its significance and urging wide public awareness due to its content. Speaker 1 (Deborah Tavares) explains the document appeared on NASA’s site as a PowerPoint by Dennis Bushnell, the chief NASA scientist at Langley, presented July 2001, just months before 9/11. The title is future strategic issues, future warfare circa 2025. She notes the document claims, on page four, that the presentation is based on existing data, trends, analysis, technologies, with no “pixie dust,” and that the entire premise centers on robots, cyborgs, and humans—creating a conflict between stated “future” and reality at the time. She emphasizes she found shocking material on page 93. Speaker 0 (Trevor Coppola) asks about authorship and whether the public was intended to see it. Speaker 1 asserts that elites often telegraph their plans and that the NASA document was public but likely unseen by most, implying it was not widely noticed or absorbed. He/She highlights explicit statements on page 93: “capture torture Americans in living color on prime time,” followed by “terror attacks within the Continental United States using binary biologicals,” the use of an EMP, radiation frequencies against brains, and “conduct serious sigh war and collateral damage and exploitation.” The document also mentions “exploit CNN syndrome.” They reference a CIA-linked network and suggest the document involves global corporations and agencies (US Air Force, DARPA, CIA, FBI, Southern Command, Atlantic Command, Australian DoD) and that the planet is treated as a corporate realm (“USA Inc.”). They claim the document discusses beam weapons (page 45) and asserts humans are to be superseded by machines, noting fears that “humans have taken over and vastly shortened evolution” and that the bankers/global elites seek immortality and transhumanism. Speaker 1 describes other alarming concepts: microdust/microns as a weapon, a completely new legal warfare approach, and the use of frequencies (low and microwave) in warfare; reference to U.S. Army reports on smart meters and frequency targeting (site smartmetersmurder.com). They assert that frequencies will affect 100% of the population, with “canaries in the coal mine” experiencing health issues such as tinnitus, heart palpitations, skin rashes, sleep disturbances. They discuss how the elites shield themselves (cancer cures, chip mechanisms) and mention chemtrails/nanofibers as a phase in their plan, connecting this to broader depopulation and mind control aims. Speaker 1 questions how to shield the elites from their own weapons and connects the document to broader global manipulation, including social engineering, mass media control, and surveillance via metering and wireless infrastructure. They claim that the document reveals the intention to manage education, communications, and even the economy through telecommunication and metering. Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a multi-faceted strategy: to awaken the public through education of key source documents, not revolution but revelation, and to organize grassroots awareness. They reference the “Quiet Weapons Silent Wars” document (1954) and “Iron Mountain” as foundational texts, arguing they outline a strategy to control humanity and shape political systems, education, and culture. Speaker 1 promotes accessibility of sources: stopthecrime.net, linking to smartmetersmurder.com, and YouTube content by Barry Trower on weaponization of frequencies, highlighting disguised cell towers and new deployment tactics (church steeples, yucca shapes, etc.). They stress the necessity of recognizing the NASA document, moving beyond illusion to a reality defined by these texts, and propose that public education can drive solutions without violence. They warn of a reality in which technologies (drones, micro dust, beam weapons, and surveillance) could be used to take down the U.S. with minimal confirmation of fingerprints. The discussion ends with acknowledgments and a plan to direct listeners to stopthecrime.net for more information and related resources.

Disguises can be used to maintain anonymity. Dyeing hair and wearing different clothes are options. Masks are useful for disguises. Creativity is also helpful. Keeping a change of clothes in a backpack is a good idea. For example, if wearing a white shirt, a blue sweatshirt can be put on if things get chaotic. Having such items readily available is beneficial.

Deborah Tavares and Trevor Coppola discuss a NASA war document found on NASA’s website, a 2001 PowerPoint by Dennis Bushnell, Chief NASA Scientist at Langley Center, titled “future strategic issues, future warfare circa 2025.” They emphasize that the document, which was public online, presents a stark conflict between a stated current reality and the future it envisions, focusing on robots, cyborgs, and humans. Key claims highlighted from the document: - On page 93, the document reportedly states: “capture, torture Americans in living color on prime time,” followed by references to terror attacks within the Continental United States using binary biologicals, taking down critical infrastructure, and using an EMP, radiation frequencies against brains, and serious cyber and collateral damage; it also mentions exploiting “CNN syndrome.” - The document lists that networks and agencies involved include the US Air Force, DARPA, the CIA, the FBI, Southern Command, Atlantic Command, Australian Department of Defense, and other agencies, and notes a global dimension involving corporations and banks operating as governments (“USA Inc.”). - It describes that humans are increasingly viewed as limited or diminishing in value: “humans are too large… too slow… and have rapidly decreasing to negative value,” with a push toward reliance on large logistical trains and technologies. - It discusses the use of beam weapons, frequencies, low and microwave frequencies, and a plan for warfare that would affect 100% of the human population with these frequencies; some will be “canaries in the coal mine” due to health maladies such as ringing in the ears, heart palpitations, skin rashes, and sleep disturbances. - The document references microdust as a weapon—“micron sized mechanized dust … distributed as an aerosol and inhaled into the lungs,” which bores into lung tissue and executes pathological missions. - It anticipates the use of frequencies to target enemies (humans), including the role of smart meters and the electrical grid, and mentions an allied US Army report on the use of frequencies to target the enemy. - It also notes that elites shield themselves via advanced technologies and that transhumanism is of interest; chemtrails and nanofibers are discussed as part of multi-phase attacks, including environmental manipulation and population control strategies. - The discussion connects these ideas to broader conspiratorial frameworks, including the Iron Mountain report, the New World Order, and the Bilderberg group, asserting that elite planners aim to control education, political systems, and media to advance their goals; the “silent weapons” document (1954) is described as outlining a strategy to control the population through social engineering and warfare without public release. - They reference the “artificial womb” concept, which would provide a protective shell around people, and predict a future where education, work, and information are telecommunicated, enabling rewriting of history and suppression of higher consciousness through fluoride, aspartame, dyes, and other toxins. - The discussion connects these themes to current technologies: concealed cell phone towers (disguised as trees, church steeples, yuccas, or roadside signs), the proliferation of towers near campuses (with a cancer cluster at San Diego State University cited as suspected evidence), and the notion that frequencies and towers will be used to take down infrastructure and influence populations. - They propose actions: education through key documents (the NASA war document, silent weapons, Iron Mountain, and related works) and broad public awareness via stopthecrime.net and smartmetersmurder.com; they caution against revolution, arguing that revelation is needed to avoid martial law and further suppression. Practical pointers given include: stopthecrime.net as a hub, with links to smartmetersmurder.com and related YouTube content by Barry Trower on frequency weaponization, and a call to scrutinize how wireless infrastructure and environmental programs are deployed. The conversation closes with agreement on the importance of disseminating this information to spur a grassroots response.

The speaker says they do not have Wi‑Fi, Bluetooth, or any wireless devices in their house, arguing that there is no need for wireless technology to “ping” microwaves throughout the home. They reference a recurring claim that wireless technology is not microwaves, then respond by pointing to a book titled *The Zapping of America*, described as “microwaves and the deadly risk,” written by Paul B. They state that the book argues all wireless technology is microwaves and that it was created by Raytheon, citing the first cell phone and first wireless technology as being created by Raytheon. The speaker then claims that the Department of Defense wants people to have wireless technology in their houses because, they say, it “cooks them” and causes health issues including autoimmune issues, loss of smell, loss of taste, dizziness, and brain fog. They also claim that with wireless technology, people can “watch the people” and see what is in a house. The speaker recommends the book *The Zapping of America* by Paul Broder and suggests viewers look into Paul Broder, describing him as possibly French.

In China, a method to make social media posts go viral involves a setup of many smartphones. The process uses regular phones stripped down to their circuit boards, which are gathered together and connected to power and the internet. With the right software, this arrangement can run and control dozens of phones simultaneously. Using this system, one can create multiple accounts and artificially boost likes and follows.

The dialogue centers on accusations and revelations about political operatives and influence campaigns. Key points include: - A list of individuals named as problematic figures: Jack Kosobiak, Gabe Hoffman, Mike Cernovich, and Laura Loomer. Gabe Hoffman is described as “running hops on people” and as “a bad guy,” with a claim that these people are “evil” and unregistered foreign agents that the speaker will be watching closely. - A claim of infiltration and surveillance: one speaker asserts that someone close to them was likely there to infiltrate, and that “these people” attempted to set up someone they know and love, with the speaker vowing to monitor everything they do. - Allegations of role in broader disruptive actions: one speaker says, “We conduct riots and color revolutions and, you know, steal elections, and we overthrow governments we don't like. And I was part of that.” - The origin of operational concepts: one speaker mentions IIA, describing it as social media psychological warfare that began in 2007. - A sense of punitive consequence and manipulation: another speaker states that “they’re all being punished because they thought that what those important people told them was gonna happen,” and recalls being present during a plan to trash the capital, noting a lack of preparedness and security knowledge. - Reactions to claims about being controlled: one speaker says it pisses them off that others claim they’re being handled, with another agreeing that such claims have been heard before. - A warning tone about danger and preparation: one speaker warns that it is “very dangerous” that people are out there giving others hope, describing “a storm coming like nothing you have ever seen,” and asserting that not a single person is prepared for it. - Personal and on-site context: there are mentions of returning to a site to get a burner phone and use ghost accounts, and of attempting to coordinate around Breva, indicating ongoing, weaponized online activity and counter-movement tactics. Overall, the speakers blend accusations of manipulation and clandestine influence with admissions of involvement in disruptive actions, interspersed with warnings of impending upheaval and calls for vigilance.

The speaker urges rapid downsizing of wealth and assets, especially for anyone who will have a public presence or an active social media profile. The core instruction is to get wealth out of the traditional system and keep it on a minimal, flexible footing so a person can stay “light on your feet” as they fight this good fight. The emphasis is placed on anonymity and mobility: if you have public visibility and your assets are traceable, you are vulnerable. A central recommendation is to move wealth into Bitcoin and to do so in a way that makes it effectively invisible to others. The speaker asserts that once wealth is converted into Bitcoin, “it's in Bitcoin. Right? So nobody knows you have it. Nobody can fucking prove that you got it.” The concern is exposure through centralized avenues: “it's on a centralized exchange in an area where they can obviously see that it's in your name.” The implication is that public names and on-chain records can reveal ownership and make one a target. To protect anonymity, the speaker prescribes using cold storage, an air-gapped multisig wallet setup. The process involves transferring funds into a secure Bitcoin storage solution that is not connected to the internet or any easily traceable accounts. The description suggests creating a robust, private system that resists easy attribution or retrieval by others. The narrative uses a stark metaphor about risk and loss: you might “go on a boat ride and you fucking lose your private keys and it sucks. You lost all your Bitcoin. Oh, well.” This underscores the consequence of losing access credentials in a highly secure storage arrangement—the assets could be irretrievable. Overall, the message centers on two intertwined ideas: (1) reduce and compartmentalize wealth to maintain mobility and privacy, especially for public figures, and (2) use Bitcoin and advanced storage methods (cold storage, air-gapped multisig) to keep wealth hidden from prying eyes, with the acknowledgement that missteps (like losing private keys) result in total loss. The speaker repeats the imperative: “Gotta get your fucking wealth out of the system,” reinforcing the urgency of downscaling and re-holding wealth in a way that minimizes exposure.

The speaker discusses the activities of a group called CTIL (Cyber Threat Intelligence League) and their efforts to combat misinformation and disinformation on social media platforms. The whistleblower reveals that CTIL used Python code to scrape records from Twitter and tracked incidents of disinformation. They also worked on counter messaging, encouraging mask-wearing, and building an amplification network. The speaker mentions that some CTIL members took extreme measures to conceal their identities. The group's activities received little attention until now, but Wired published an article about CTIL, highlighting their work against misinformation. The speaker concludes by mentioning the upcoming testimony to Congress and refers to Matt Taibbi's perspective on the matter.

"keep your phone out of reach and off." "Now remember information itself is a distraction and your phone is arguably the number one source for incoming information." "To avoid that then turn off all notifications." "Then keep the phone in a cupboard, the other room or the car that way it won't gnaw at your attention." "Lastly you want as few gadgets, sources of distraction as possible." "Ideally you don't have a phone, a TV, and a tablet in sight so instead we want to simplify." "We want to just get rid of these things." "Here's a helpful way to remember this heuristic. Have less to ignore so you can focus more."

The transcript argues that smartphone design and settings are highly intentional and may be aimed at managing health risks related to radiation exposure. It claims that a phone’s settings can show how far it must be kept away from the body to “prevent cancer,” highlighting an “RF exposure” section. The speaker describes navigating the phone interface: going to Settings, then General, then scrolling to Legal and Regulatory, and clicking the item at the very bottom labeled “RF exposure,” which stands for radio frequency exposure. They say the phone displays a required separation distance from the body, claiming the speaker’s device lists about “five millimeters separation off of your body,” compared to the size of a pencil eraser. They state that this coverage is meant to reduce risk from using the phone against the body, specifically saying it is “covered when you get brain cancer because you put your phone to your head.” The speaker emphasizes using speaker phone rather than holding the phone to the head. The transcript also claims that a newly released study found that the further the phone is away from the body, “the better,” and it links this to higher rates of testicular cancer in young men, alleging that placing phones near the testicles contributes to increased risk. It further claims that when phones were smaller and women put them in their breast, there were cases of breast cancers matching “the shape of that lithium battery in there.” Finally, the speaker advises keeping phones off the body, not putting phones to the head, and avoiding use in conditions like driving “down a road in a metal tube,” where the phone supposedly works harder to find a cell signal and emits more electromagnetic fields.

The speaker says they use an iPhone, claiming “everybody I know” and “everybody at the CIA” uses an iPhone. They explain that when iPhones were unusual and hard to find, they used Android phones, and that all staff were assigned Androids; they also mention that they were originally assigned Nextels, described as walkie-talkie devices. The speaker recounts taking a Nextel to Bulgaria, where it beeped all night and people tried to send walkie-talkie-style messages, leading them to turn it in. They say the group transitioned to iPhones because Android phones are “so hard to crack,” and they advise against using Android devices. The speaker associates the risk with “the Chinese, the Russians, the Iranians, the Cubans,” and “most importantly, the Israelis,” and urges not to “do an android.” They then broaden the point beyond phone choice, suggesting people should consider what other aspects of life expose their secrets. They conclude by recommending that people assume “these bad guys are everywhere,” since, they say, they actually are everywhere. The speaker’s key takeaway is to make stealing personal secrets as hard as possible, and they close with a directive: “number one on your things to do today list, drop that android,” repeating “drop that Android.”

Don't trust, verify. In the next 5-10 years, deepfakes will make it hard to distinguish real from fake. Shift your mindset to verify things through experience and intuition. Devices are affecting our brain connections, so rely on personal verification.

For secure cell phone usage, follow these tips: If you need to contact someone in Europe, set your phone to German language and use only German apps, sending voice messages instead of typing. Avoid Chinese language and apps, regardless of the phone you use. In the UK, buy a phone there and communicate in English, again using voice messages instead of typing. Avoid connecting to WiFi and keep each phone in a separate location with different language settings. To ensure safety, periodically switch to new phones and discard the old ones.

The speaker introduces antennasearch.com to find cell phone towers near homes and suggests switching cell phones to LTE instead of 5G to boycott a system that is allegedly poisoning people. The speaker claims safety tests are inadequate and that the rapid rollout of 5G since 2020 is causing radio wave sickness, which was allegedly removed from medical books in the 1920s. Symptoms of radio wave sickness purportedly include fevers, chills, shortness of breath, fatigue, headaches, loss of smell, insomnia, pain in the chest, dizziness, muscle pain, hypertension, strokes, and thyroid issues. The speaker states that cell phone tower companies are immune to lawsuits and references a 1971 US Navy document that supposedly acknowledged the damages of this technology. The speaker eliminated WiFi, Bluetooth, and smart meters and now uses a wired internet connection.

Signal is recommended for secure communications. For organizing, relationship-building with press and officials, and sharing information, Blue Sky is suggested as an alternative to Twitter and Facebook, which are not trusted due to their ownership. Blue Sky is considered more independent and less likely to be taken over by harmful elements. Signal is preferred for private communications, while Blue Sky is better for coordinating between groups.