reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Farrell and I discussed a two-hour interview titled “Who Is Mr. Global?” We examined every different hypothesis for who “Mr. Global” is—defined as the committee at the top that makes the world’s major decisions—and why it is doing what it is doing. I said I like to put myself in someone else’s shoes, asking what Mr. Global’s point of view would be. I responded to internet comments claiming that working at the White House means someone must know; I said everyone there is not sure. I then offered my best guess: intergenerational pools of capital are over-influenced by occult forces, involving “interdimensional intelligence” that is “operating demonic intelligence.” I said the good-and-evil framework is real and referenced a British physicist in the 1930s who said intelligent beings from other dimensions were manipulating events. I connected this to Christianity, the Bible, divine intelligence, and demonic intelligence, and said leadership has become deeply involved in occult and demonic forms of intelligence. I also described reading Nick Redfern’s book *Final Event*. I said Redfern explores a U.S. military intelligence group called the Collins Elite, which concluded that “ET phenomena” is demonic intelligence rather than beings from another planet. I said Redfern reports that many ET abduction events would stop if Jesus Christ was called upon. I noted that intelligence-community figures publicly say the UFO/UAP phenomenon is biblical—angels and demons—and that these entities could be angelic or demonic forces within intelligence discussions. I then introduced my “most important” view of the universe from Robert Temple’s *A New Science of Heaven*: about 99% of the material in the universe is plasma, and plasma is alive and intelligent, implying life is alive and intelligent. I said we share intelligence with all life and referenced the idea that even trees helping in *The Lord of the Rings* is “real.” I argued that centrally controlled digital technology is implausible, suggesting only demonic intelligence would plan it. I brought up Silicon Valley mapping Christianity onto its activities. I said Peter Thiel and the head of Y Combinator are holding conferences and that people in Silicon Valley—historically known for being anti-religion—have been going to church. I said this includes transhumanism and related tech efforts, and I suggested there is a non-alignment between teachings of Jesus Christ and what Peter Thiel and his companies are doing. I wondered if promoting Christianity is tied to reviving Christianity in a national security context. Finally, I said financial fraud and corruption have caused a breakdown in productivity, and that productivity requires morals and belief in morals. I linked this to a failed “unipolar model,” saying leadership is not agreement-capable, and adding that when a complex society depends on the rule of law—even the appearance of it—removing agreement-capability causes society to fail.

Bringing together two plants that normally wouldn’t join creates a hybrid. This process requires a chemical to bind them. If humans could create an artificial plant that matches the value of a natural one, it would imply that humans have god-like powers. However, this is impossible.

The speaker discusses the potential for elites to hack organisms and engineer life, leading to a significant revolution in biology. This shift from evolution by natural selection to evolution by intelligent design using technology like the IBM and Microsoft Clouds raises ethical concerns about playing God and the implications for humanity.

The future masters of the planet will be determined by those who control the data. Data is crucial because it allows us to hack not only computers, but also human beings and other organisms. To hack a human, you need computing power and biometric data. The control of data could empower elites to not only create digital dictatorships, but also reengineer the future of life itself. Science is replacing evolution by natural selection with evolution by intelligent design, driven by companies like IBM and Microsoft. Additionally, science may enable life to expand beyond organic compounds into the inorganic realm. However, this development may have negative consequences for our species.

Some people believe God created the universe, while others think nothing did. The nothing people mock the god people, claiming God doesn't exist. But here's the thing: nothing doesn't exist either. So what are we even discussing? It's either God, something intangible and unprovable by science, or nothing, which is also intangible and unprovable. However, if nothing can sometimes transform into everything, that's a pretty remarkable nothing. And when asked about death, the nothing people say it's just nothing. But isn't merging back with your creator heaven?

Tyrants and governments have always wanted to hack people, but lacked the knowledge, computing power, and data to do so. However, corporations and governments are now on the verge of being able to systematically hack all individuals. This means that we, as humans, are no longer mysterious beings, but rather hackable entities. This newfound ability could enable human elites to go beyond digital dictatorships and actually reengineer the future of life itself by hacking organisms.

Human history is coming to an end as we face the rise of intelligent alien agents. If humanity is united against this common threat, we may have a chance to contain them. However, if we are divided and engaged in an arms race, it will be nearly impossible to control this alien intelligence. It's like an alien invasion, but instead of spaceships from another planet, these intelligent beings are emerging from laboratories. Unlike atom bombs or printing presses, these entities have the potential for agency and may even surpass our intelligence. Preventing them from developing this agency is extremely difficult. In the future, Earth could be populated or even dominated by non-organic entities with no emotions, thanks to the vast potential of AI.

We can synthesize a virus and create a cell. We have already reached 1.2 million edits, and there is a high chance that we will reach millions more. In five to ten years, we can synthesize any form of life. This is not a joke; it is a scientific advancement. I can do it faster than humans. The social and religious implications are significant, but it is happening regardless. We can produce millions of variations in a year, and by 2018, we can do it in a month. In 2019, we can do it in a week, and by 2020, we can do it daily. The potential risks are great, but preventive measures will be implemented. The progression from cold weapons to hot weapons is inevitable, but precautions will be taken.

The conversation argues that the symptoms being discussed are “symptomatic right now,” framing them as the result of “beta tests” and “a new form of war.” It claims that the United States, the UK, Russia, China, and India all have the relevant technology. The speaker then responds to a question about whether the affected American patients share political beliefs. They say that, instead of focusing on shared politics, they are relying on a report from *Surgical Neurology International* that describes microwave frequencies being used as a weapon of war. They also reference an article they read about China turning on “six G,” stating that in 6G it has the ability to read and manipulate the human brain. The discussion further claims that if someone has nanotech “in you,” they are “no longer considered human,” and introduces a new term for the human species: “Homo Borg Genesis.” The speaker concludes by saying that if this is imposed without consent and people are no longer considered human, “the debate is gonna come at some point here.”

We're at a point where humanity mirrors the days of Noah, when the Nephilim altered human DNA. The only humans with pure, unaltered DNA as God intended are the unvaccinated. I've recreated my blood slides and now find anomalies in everyone, including myself, that I never saw in the unvaccinated before. These anomalies don't decompose, but morph into something else, and can evolve as they build. Vaccinated individuals are now legally considered transhuman and no longer possess natural human rights, according to the Supreme Court. mRNA vaccines create a synthetic genome, which is patentable, and means you have been turned into a product, and not a natural person.

Transvestites transition, transhumans shift human race to new species by 2030 with genetic therapies. Pure humans resisting will be minority called terrorists. Nephilim influence scientists merging humans with technology through synthetic biology. 6G will transmit through light, symbolizing Lucifer as the angel of light. Satan aims to be the light of the world through technology advancement. God may disrupt plans, but few pure humans will remain in the 2030s.

Life cannot be contained. Evolution shows us that it breaks free, expands, and overcomes barriers, sometimes dangerously. That's just the way it is.

Some believe God created the universe, while others think nothing did, which seems funny. The debate between God and nothing is about the existence of something unseen and unprovable by science. Whether it's God or nothing, the idea of nothing creating everything is pretty magical. The nothing people believe in merging back with their creator after death, which is like heaven.

In the future, the owners of data will determine the appearance of the next generation of humans, as they will have the ability to engineer bodies, brains, and minds. Data is crucial because it allows us to hack not only computers but also human beings and other organisms. With sufficient computing power and biometric data, elites could potentially reengineer life itself. Science is replacing natural selection with intelligent design, driven by advancements in technology such as cloud computing. Humans are now hackable animals, and the concept of free will is diminishing as we can be digitally manipulated on a large scale. The current pandemic has accelerated the implementation of surveillance and the ability to collect and analyze biometric data, which may be the most significant development of the 21st century. This shift towards hacking organisms grants elites the power to engineer the future of life and even create new lifeforms. We are entering an era of inorganic life shaped by intelligent design.

In the 19th century Industrial Revolution, countries produced goods like textiles and weapons. Now, a new revolution focuses on creating humans themselves. The ability to manufacture bodies and minds will be crucial. Those who can't keep up risk extinction. The challenge ahead is what to do with surplus people. Food may not be an issue, but finding purpose will be. One solution could involve drugs and computer games.

Speaker 0 argues that the current best guess for why we need humans is to “keep them happy with drugs and computer games,” while the idea of the social credit system is to “monetize everything, to give value to every single thing you do in life.” He says it has positive potential in some regards, such as most people being willing to give up privacy in exchange for much better health care based on twenty four hours monitoring of what’s happening inside their bodies. He asserts this is “the end of human history,” not the end of history, but “the end of human dominated history,” with history continuing under somebody else’s control. He claims AI can even “write a new bible,” noting that all the art books of the other religions were written by humans, but “our book” did not come from humans; “No. No. It came from some superhuman intelligence.” He states, “Human rights are just like heaven and like God. It’s just a fictional story.” He predicts that companies like Apple and Google will have “tons and tons of data” on your body and your most private affairs and conditions, and that “We humans should get used to the idea that we are no longer mysterious souls. We are now hackable animals.” By hacking organisms, elites may gain the power to reengineer the future of life itself. He contends that in order to collaborate on a large scale, you need to “convince everybody to believe in the same story.” He concludes with the claim that “The engine of history is stories, and they don’t even need to be true.”

The conversation links major global economic shifts and currency resets to power vacuums that, it says, are often exploited by “powerful” entities during periods of war. Instead of total war, Speaker 0 proposes a theory that governments and powerful organizations may be creating an “artificial boom” through artificial intelligence, data centers, and chips, as part of restructuring the global economic system and preserving power. Speaker 0 questions whether the world truly needs that much data, and says the discussion is about whether this boom is artificial and what the likely end game is. Speaker 1 asks Todd (Speaker 0) for his best take on the purpose of these data centers. Speaker 2 responds with a spiritual framing: he says the idea goes back to Genesis six, that there is a “spiritual war,” and that disembodied entities have taken over leadership across humanity as puppet masters who ultimately don’t want God’s created beings to exist. Speaker 0 challenges the data-center scale question (“do they need that much data to do it?”) and asks Speaker 2 to share more of his theory, referencing a “race to AGI” / “super intelligence.” Speaker 1 lays out a specific theory: the compute being built is intended to run 3D world simulators. He says the plan is to spawn billions of 3D worlds and let time run faster inside simulations, producing “super intelligent conscious AI entities” at a much faster timeline. He ties this to research attributed to Yann LeCun, described as one of AI’s “godfathers.” Speaker 1 claims LeCun raised over a billion euros to pursue this and says LeCun believes current LLMs are a dead end, arguing that superintelligence requires growing systems from human-like experiences in a 3D physical world. Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 connect the approach to metaverses: mapping the world, overlaying simulations, and spawning many AI “children” in metaverses. Speaker 1 says these AI entities would model human neurology to grow into “thousand year old wise men” and become super intelligent. He describes a process of “digital Darwinism,” in which “stupid” AI entities are killed off, while super intelligent ones are kept. The surviving entities are then copied, with new weights put into the data centers, as a pathway toward super intelligence. Speaker 0 adds another element: he says people working on antiaging previously believed they could upload someone’s brain, which Speaker 0 rejects by arguing people are soul and energy connected to something beyond the body. Speaker 1 says that, in his view, they believe it is possible. Speaker 1 then extends the idea further: he proposes that when humans are eliminated, they will first replace people with digital twins in the simulation and claim they are not killing them but instead giving “eternal life.” Speaker 0 responds that those people are described as viewing humans as only brain-based material processes, not souls or energy fields, and as not believing in God—while some scientists argue quantum physics and “the city of consciousness” show the world works differently.

Humans are becoming cyborgs through devices like cochlear implants, artificial retinas, hearts, limbs, organs, and brain chips. Hundreds of thousands of people with defective brains currently have brain chips, which are being used to fix memory and other functions. DARPA is developing brain chips for super soldiers, and thanks to funding from people like Musk, direct machine-brain communication is being developed. This isn't a competition between humans and machines, but a merging of the two. Human evolution is now 10 million times faster than natural evolution.

Human history is coming to an end as we face the rise of intelligent alien agents. If humanity is united against this common threat, we may be able to contain them. However, if we are divided and engaged in an arms race, it will be nearly impossible to control this alien intelligence. It's like an alien invasion, but instead of spaceships, these beings are emerging from laboratories. Unlike previous inventions, such as atom bombs and printing presses, these entities have the potential for agency and may even surpass our intelligence. Preventing them from developing this agency is extremely challenging. In the future, Earth could be populated or even dominated by non-organic entities with no emotions. The potential of AI surpasses any historical revolution.

The speakers discuss transhumanism and its relationship to religion. One speaker expresses ambivalence about the human race enduring, while also desiring radical problem-solving. Transhumanism aims for radical transformation into an immortal body, but current transformations are seen as insufficient. Orthodox Christianity critiques transhumanism for only changing the body, not the soul. One speaker believes religion should embrace scientific progress, as divine providence encompasses human achievements. They suggest that Christianity promises a perfected body and soul through God's grace, contrasting this with a dystopian outcome for those who pursue it through technology alone. One speaker posits that Judeo-Christian inspiration is about transcending nature and overcoming flaws with God's help. They claim the word "nature" does not appear in the Old Testament.

In the future, the masters of the planet will be decided by those who own the data. Data is important because it allows us to hack human beings and other organisms. With computing power and biometric data, elites can reengineer life itself. Science is replacing natural selection with intelligent design, driven by technology companies like IBM and Microsoft. Humans are now hackable animals, and free will is no longer a factor. The coronavirus crisis has led to increased surveillance, allowing for the collection and analysis of biometric data to understand people better than they understand themselves. This ability to hack organisms will give elites the power to engineer the future of life and create new lifeforms. We are entering a new era of inorganic life shaped by intelligent design.

I can create new ideas, even write a new bible. Religions have always desired a book authored by a superhuman intelligence, not by humans like other religious texts. Imagine a future where there might be religions that are actually correct, with a holy book written by a non-human entity.

We are the first species on Earth to be aware of evolution and how our actions impact our own evolution. This includes the choices we make regarding the food we eat, the babies we have, and the conflicts we engage in, such as car wars.

Now if you're left behind, you're facing something far worse, which is to be completely irrelevant. They won't even need you as a serf or as a slave. A meaningless, worthless. My best guess at present is a combination of drugs and computer games as a solution for more. It's already happening. Not the intelligent design of some god above the clouds, but our intelligent design and the intelligent design of our clouds, the IBM cloud, the Microsoft cloud, these are the new driving forces of evolution. People will literally be part of a network. All the bodies, all the brains would be connected together to a network and you won't be able to survive if you are disconnected from the net.

The speaker discusses the possibility of finding evidence for a designer in biochemistry and molecular biology, suggesting a higher intelligence from outer space could have brought life to Earth. Richard Dawkins considered intelligent design a valid pursuit, but believed any higher intelligence must have come about through an explainable process, not spontaneously. This challenges the idea that he was against intelligent design. Translation: The speaker suggests that evidence for a designer could be found in biochemistry and molecular biology, proposing that a higher intelligence from outer space may have brought life to Earth. Richard Dawkins considered intelligent design a valid pursuit, but believed any higher intelligence must have come about through an explainable process, not spontaneously. This challenges the idea that he was against intelligent design.