TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The World Economic Forum is often dismissed as a conspiracy theory, but the Federal Liberal Party seems to be copying its policies. Scott Morrison's trusted digital identity bill is a direct copy of the World Economic Forum's global digital identity project. This bill aims to shift the global economy towards an access model, where you rent goods and services instead of owning them. It essentially means a life via subscription. While they claim it will help sustainability, it actually leads to a closed loop economy where the rich get richer and you have less. It's like a form of slavery.

Speaker 0 describes digital identity as not just a passport on your iPhone but something that entails “just about everything the government would like to know about you.” He cites a Dutch media example where the CEO of one of the largest Dutch banks proposed a “personal carbon credit,” calling it a “carbon wallet.” He notes this aligns with plans some say the World Economic Forum has for us. She suggested that if everyone gets an individual personal carbon credit, rich people who “wanna go on holiday a little too often” could buy personal carbon credit from others who “can’t afford buying plane tickets or eating meat too often,” thereby swapping credits. Speaker 1 elaborates with a concrete scenario: if Bill Gates or Leonardo DiCaprio’s carbon footprint becomes too large, “some peasant living in his hovel upcountry somewhere” could sell his carbon allowance to Leonardo DiCaprio, so DiCaprio can park his yacht in Saint Tropez for a couple of extra days. The exchange is described as “Exactly right,” illustrating that the rich would buy from the poor in order to indulge in travel or activities that emit more carbon. Speaker 0 concludes that “the rich will get richer, the poor will get poorer,” and notes that these ideas are being stated openly as if they’re not controversial. He characterizes the concept as neo feudalism, labeling it as such.

Right now, we are in a political war between the mega rich and everybody else. And the question is, if you're the mega rich, how are you going to control the many when you are few? The way you're gonna do it was with programmable money, but programmable money doesn't click in and work well unless you've got everybody on the grid. You need to be able to track them. You need to be able to watch their behavior. You need to be able to influence their behavior, and then you've got complete control. It's digital money that can be integrated with a social credit system. So it says, if you didn't take your vaccine shot this month, we're gonna turn off your money. That is a coup d'etat. That is the end of human liberty in the West.

They fear a push towards centralized digital currency and a social credit score system controlled by those in power. The potential use of a vaccine app for control is concerning. The effectiveness and financial gains from recent events are alarming. The idea of a social credit system like in China, where dissent can limit your access to basic needs, is frightening. Self-censorship becomes a means of survival.

In China, the government controls citizens' spending through a social credit system linked to bank accounts. Programmable money is being tested in countries like Sweden and Canada. This technology could soon track and limit individual carbon usage, with penalties for exceeding limits including fines automatically deducted from bank accounts.

The speaker discusses the potential for central bank digital currency to enable social controls by linking to credit cards and bank accounts. Dissenters could be silenced by having their accounts shut down. Control could extend to limiting meat consumption through quotas at the cash register. This level of control is likened to living on a "prison planet."

Digital identity is more than just a digital passport; it encompasses extensive personal information. Recently, a Dutch bank CEO proposed a personal carbon credit system, suggesting that wealthy individuals could buy carbon credits from those who can't afford luxuries like travel or meat. This means that affluent people could offset their carbon footprints by purchasing allowances from less fortunate individuals. The implication is that the rich would continue to thrive while the poor struggle, highlighting a neo-feudalistic system. This idea was presented without any acknowledgment of its controversial nature.

In China, the government controls citizens' spending through a social credit system linked to their bank accounts. Programmable central bank currencies are being tested in countries like Sweden and Canada. Nearly half of the world's nations are exploring this technology. Programmable money could lead to personal carbon limits, with penalties for exceeding them. Individuals could be charged for surpassing their carbon allowance, automatically deducted from their bank accounts. This system could track and control all financial transactions based on carbon usage.

The speaker argues that AI excels at simulating anything that can be expressed mathematically, and since financial transactions can be expressed mathematically, AI can be used to monitor and influence financial behavior. The core concern is that with programmable money and close tracking of individuals, it becomes possible to turn money on and off and to use AI and surveillance systems to manage and control behavior. The speaker gives a provocative example: a question about what happens if authorities demand a transgender change for a child or threaten to turn off money, illustrating a system in which programmable money is integrated with surveillance and behavior-modification mechanisms. The proposed system would enable surveillance, tracking, and conditional access to money—financing incentives or penalties tied to behavior—and could be integrated with digital ID. The speaker argues that once programmable money is paired with digital identity, it amounts to complete control. This is framed as a problem because, on a global scale, there are divide-and-conquer tactics masking the underlying issue: a political struggle between the mega rich and everyone else. According to the speaker, the megacorporate or ultra-wealthy perspective would try to control the many when they are few, and programmable money is the tool to achieve that control. The claim is that for programmable money to function effectively, everyone must be on the grid, allowing the system to track and observe behavior and influence it, thereby exerting total control. The speaker emphasizes that this is not limited to wearables or an Internet of Bodies; it represents a coup d'etat and the end of human liberty in the West. Key points emphasized include: - AI’s strength in simulating mathematically expressible phenomena, including financial transactions. - Programmable money enabling on/off control of individuals’ finances when coupled with surveillance. - The potential for incentives and penalties to be tied to behavior through money. - The necessity of a digital ID to realize complete control. - The notion that such a system is tied to political and economic power dynamics between the mega rich and others. - The idea that universal inclusion on the grid is required for programmable money to work, leading to pervasive tracking and behavior influence. - The assertion that this would constitute a coup d'etat and threaten the end of human liberty in the West.

The CEO of a Dutch bank suggested the idea of a personal carbon credit, similar to a digital identity, which would allow people to buy and sell carbon allowances. This means that wealthy individuals could purchase carbon credits from those who don't use them, enabling them to continue their high-carbon lifestyles. This proposal has raised concerns about increasing wealth inequality, as the rich would benefit while the poor would suffer. This concept has been criticized as a form of neofeudalism.

The CEO of a Dutch bank suggested the idea of a personal carbon credit, similar to a digital identity, which could be bought and sold. This means that wealthy individuals could purchase carbon credits from those who don't use them, allowing them to continue their high-carbon lifestyles. This proposal would result in the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer, creating a neofeudalistic system. The concept is seen as a way to control carbon emissions but raises concerns about inequality.

The CEO of a Dutch bank suggested the idea of a personal carbon credit, similar to a digital passport, which would include various personal information. This aligns with the plans of the World Economic Forum. The CEO humorously proposed that wealthy individuals could buy carbon credits from those who cannot afford certain luxuries, such as frequent travel or meat consumption. This would allow the rich to offset their carbon footprint and continue their lavish lifestyles. The result would be a widening wealth gap, resembling a form of neo-feudalism.

The speaker expresses concern about the push towards a centralized digital currency and a social credit score system. They mention the possibility of connecting it to a health app and using another pandemic as a means to implement it. The speaker highlights the effectiveness and financial gains of such systems. They also mention the consequences in China, where a bad social credit score can restrict one's ability to buy a plane ticket, car, or get a loan. The fear of self-censorship is emphasized as people try to avoid being a part of this system.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is pushing for a personal carbon social credit system that tracks everything people do, buy, and eat. They are encouraged by the global acceptance of COVID-19 restrictions and plan to use this to further their control over society. The WEF is also promoting their 4th Industrial Revolution, which utilizes blockchain technology and central bank digital currencies to monitor all activities. They advocate for increased costs on carbon-intensive activities and reducing demand for certain things, potentially including meat, air travel, and family size. They want to set personal levels of acceptable emissions and redefine a fair share of emissions. These actions are part of a larger agenda to reshape society, with global censorship, taxation, and attacks on opposing governments and individuals. Despite these developments, many people remain unaware or refuse to acknowledge them.

The digital identity is expanding beyond a simple passport on a phone to include personal carbon credits. Wealthy individuals could buy credits from those who can't afford luxuries like travel or meat, leading to a new form of inequality. This system mirrors Neo-feudalism, where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

The speaker expresses concern about the push towards a centralized digital currency and a social credit score system. They mention the possibility of using another pandemic as a means to implement these changes. The speaker finds this prospect scary because it has been financially effective in the past. They highlight the example of China, where a bad social credit score can restrict one's ability to make purchases or obtain loans. The speaker emphasizes the importance of not self-censoring and avoiding such a system.

Speaker 0: Control structure for taking over The United States and the rest of the world has been revealed. Please check this out. Speaker 1: The biggest part of the great reset that you're all missing is the carbon credit scan. And what is the carbon credit scan? This is where they're telling you where they want to monitor, track and trace every so called kilogram of CO2 that you emit. And they say the global average needs to be two tons per person per year and you're using 16 tons per person per year, which means your activity has to go down by 800%. So how do they plan to do that? Well, first of all, they got the new first Mastercard in the world that is going to show a carbon allowance for every single purchase you buy. And to make sure that everything has a so called carbon credit, food. When you buy food now, if it's vegan, it's gonna show you this nice low score of only one kilogram, 1.3 kilograms of CO2 per serving. Now meat will be off the charts, so that's gonna be a no no. Check this out. If you go to a restaurant, even an Italian pizza place, they're gonna show you the amount of CO2 for your dish. So literally everything you eat, everything you buy, is your clothes made of leather, that's going to cost more CO2 because it came from a cow. So every single thing you do is going to be tracked. Why? Because they want to put limits on how much you can spend monthly. They're telling you you're using 16 tons a year and they want you to use two tons a year. What does two tons look like? Well, check this out. Say you wanted to fly from Toronto to Amsterdam and now Google, by the way, Google Flights shows the carbon emissions on that flight. That flight from Toronto to Amsterdam is four seventy eight kilograms of CO2. That's almost 25% of your yearly allowance. But don't worry, if you go over your limit, they're going to charge you $170 for every kilogram, for every kilogram of carbon credits you need. This is how they're going to control where you go, how you're going to get there, what you can buy, what you can eat, who you can see. And now imagine that in a world without cash. And imagine that in a world where the government gets to control every single transaction. And this is why they're constructing fifteen minute cities, aka prison camps, because when they put these carbon credit allowances into these cities, they're gonna have you on perpetual lockdown like they did with COVID without having a virus. Thank you, everybody.

The lust to control other human beings is a story as old as time. There's a very strong drift in the direction of globalization, of the ultimate centralization of control in the hands of unelected officials at supernational organizations. They want all of the resources of the world in their pocket. The bigger picture is that an attempt is underway now to collapse liberal democracy and replace it with global technocracy. This is a coup. They're saying we can control with rules. We don't need currency anymore. It's like an inverted prison. You are supposedly free to roam about, but everything you want to access is behind lock and key. The potential for social control is gigantic and potentially irreversible. All three strategies are built on the premise of a climate crisis caused by carbon dioxide.

The concept of digital identity goes beyond a simple passport on your phone. It encompasses all the information the government wants to know about you. Recently, the CEO of a major Dutch bank suggested the idea of a personal carbon credit, similar to the plans proposed by the World Economic Forum. This would allow wealthy individuals to buy carbon credits from those who can't afford luxuries like frequent vacations or meat consumption. In essence, it would create a system where the rich get richer, resembling a form of neo-feudalism.

The CEO of a Dutch bank suggested the idea of a personal carbon credit, similar to a digital passport, which would track and limit individuals' carbon footprints. This proposal would allow wealthy individuals to buy carbon credits from those who cannot afford to travel or consume meat frequently. This system would perpetuate wealth inequality, creating a neofeudalistic society. The implications of this concept were discussed openly in the media, without any sense of controversy.

The same individuals who claim to care for public health and the environment are actually harming both. Their push for electric vehicles and AI data centers requires extensive mining, threatening ecosystems in Latin America and Africa for resources like nickel and cobalt. This process also demands significant water, which they aim to privatize through carbon markets, effectively commodifying essential life resources. The concept of carbon credits originated from a banker linked to past financial scandals, illustrating a pattern of exploiting crises for profit. Instead of saving the planet, these actions are detrimental. We must reclaim our role as creators and supporters of one another, and work to eliminate those who are damaging our world.

The CEO of a Dutch bank suggested the idea of a personal carbon credit, similar to a digital passport, which would include various personal details. This aligns with the plans of the World Economic Forum. The CEO humorously proposed that wealthy individuals could buy carbon credits from those who cannot afford luxuries like frequent travel or meat consumption. This would allow the rich to offset their carbon footprint and continue their lavish lifestyles. The result would be a widening wealth gap, with the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. This concept has been criticized as a form of neo-feudalism.

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen advocates for digital IDs and a global digital infrastructure, claiming it can boost emerging economies. Nigel Farage criticizes this as a dangerous move towards global government control and wealth redistribution. He highlights the potential risks of personal data falling into the wrong hands. The discussion also touches on the development of individual carbon footprint trackers and the programmability of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) for targeted policy functions. The speakers express concerns about loss of privacy, potential debanking based on political opinions, and the surrendering of sovereignty to international organizations. They emphasize the importance of democratic nation states cooperating and trading together while preserving liberty and freedom.

The World Economic Forum's biggest fear is that people will not comply and will fight for freedom by making individual decisions. Digital control is key to enforcing mandates and controlling lives. The speaker claims that issues like carbon emissions and experimental injections are secondary to the desire to control people from the outside in. A digital process that restricts movement, behavior, and decisions with the click of a button would mean the end of individual autonomy.

The speaker discusses the European Union's vision for digital identity and the use of vaccine passports as a precursor. They suggest that digital identity combined with Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) could lead to increased control and monitoring of individuals. For example, if someone uses CBDCs to make a purchase, their carbon emissions could be deducted from their account. The speaker believes this could result in a society with limited freedom. They encourage viewers to visit the World Economic Forum (WEF) website to find information about personal carbon allowances, which they claim supports their argument.