reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speakers discuss the latest spending bill, criticizing the Republican-controlled House and Senate for increasing spending despite promises of cuts. They highlight that the government is quietly buying its own debt, signaling underlying economic problems. They claim this is because people are not investing in long-term bonds. The speakers point out that conservative measures were removed from the bill after being used to gain initial support. They cite Thomas Massey's statements on the broken promises and Elon Musk's criticism of the bill as "political suicide" for the Republican Party. They discuss Trump's attacks on Massey for voting against the bill, including a negative ad campaign. They defend Massey as standing for the Constitution and principles. They promote an upcoming conference featuring Douglas MacGregor, who warns of potential war with Iran. They advocate for volunteerism as a core principle of liberty.

"it's not antisemitic to talk about this, and it's not antisemitic to question any foreign country's government secular government, including Israel." "We fund a lot of other countries' borders better than we fund our own." "it's over $800,000,000,000,000, actually, close to 900,000,000,000,000 is the total bill." "the 500,000,000 for Israel." "They already received $3,400,000,000 annually every single year through the State Department." "Taiwan for 500,000,000 and for Jordan for 500,000,000 as well." "There's 15,000,000 in there for AIDS prevention education activities." "America's broke. We're $37,000,000,000,000 in debt." "we just can't pay for the world anymore." "Not being an isolationist. That's actually being smart and serving the people that that pay for all of this stuff and have been chained into 37,000,000,000,000 in debt." "And that's not being mean to foreign people and foreign countries, but America's broke."

The speakers discuss the latest spending bill, criticizing the increase in spending despite Republican control of the House, Senate, and presidency. They highlight the government's quiet buying of its own debt as a sign of deeper economic problems, suggesting it reflects concerns about refinancing longer-term bonds. They point out that promised conservative measures were removed from the House bill in the Senate version, calling it a bait and switch. Thomas Massey is praised for standing against the bill, while Trump is criticized for attacking Massey and funding negative ads against him. Elon Musk's opposition to the bill is also noted, with Musk claiming it will destroy jobs and harm the country. The speakers emphasize the importance of supporting principled individuals like Massey and advocate for a voluntary society based on individual liberty, warning against the dangers of authoritarianism and excessive government power. They announce an upcoming conference featuring Colonel Douglas MacGregor, focusing on peace.

Google, Palantir, Microsoft, Apple, Meta, X, Oracle, Amazon, what do all these companies have in common? Well, they're making a bag off the Palestinian genocide. These four companies, Google, Oracle, Amazon, and Microsoft run data centers for the Israeli military, storing the massive amount of surveillance data they track Palestinians. It's the infrastructure for the genocide. They feed that data, store it in these data centers, providing the compute for Palantir's AI killing systems, their algorithms that they've entered into a massive warfare deal with Israel for. It's allowed the systematic destruction of Palestinian civilization in Gaza. That's Palantir. They've netted hundreds of billions since entering this deal. They provide the means. Who provides the weapons? Well, of course, everyone knows this answer. It's The United States taxpayer. It's our war company. So add them in there too. On top of this, you have Google, X, and Meta all taking money from Israel, all taking money from Netanyahu's propaganda arm to push propaganda to Americans, denying the genocide, denying war crimes, denying masturbation in Gaza. Most recently, drop site news exposed Google and X, Google taking 45 mil, X taking 2 mil, from Netanyahu's office to deny masturbation in Gaza. This started just days after Israel began cutting off all aid to the Gaza Strip for over eighty straight days. This is complicity at the top level. I didn't forget about Apple. Of course, they run their largest R and D center in Israel, complicit in apartheid and occupation. They also match employee donations to the IDF and groups linked to the IDF. They're funding war criminals. Let's take let's take our attention away from Israel and look back home. Every single one of these companies are run by Zionists. Every single one of them. They've all donated to Trump because if they get in his good graces, Trump will let them do whatever they want. Trump loves letting billionaires do whatever they want. In fact, that's why only five companies control 90% of The US media market. It's true. That doesn't include social media, but we'll get to that in a second. Five companies, none of The US outlets are willing to call it a genocide or call out Israel's crimes. That's because their editorial boards are controlled by Zionists. This is not some conspiracy theory. It's factual. You cannot go to CNN, let alone any conservative site. But CNN, Reuters, Washington Post, New York Times, none of them none of them are calling it genocide. They're all covering up. They're all playing the propaganda game for Israel. Now let's turn our attention to the social media because that's not included in the 90%. We have the top three, the big three, Meta, X, and TikTok. And TikTok's an interesting case. But first of all, Meta blacklist pro Palestinian activist. I'm blacklisted on Meta for my free speech criticizing Israel. They've also hired hundreds of ex IDF soldiers from the intelligence unit, unit a two hundred, to run their moderation team. That's why this is all happening. They put Zionists in charge of their free speech policy. That's similar to what TikTok has done. They got lobbied by the ADL. They were pressured by the US government, surely, by this bipartisan bill to ban TikTok because of hosting anti Israel content like mine and many people, to hire an ex IDF soldier and put her, Erica Mendel, in charge of their hate speech policy, which she changed, and those changes went into effect on September 13. Since then, every single one of my videos criticizing Israel, making connections, talking about how literally, everything I'm talking about in this video, that's what has been getting pulled off the For You page or just getting banned out right now. The censorship is super ramped up, they're trying to sell TikTok US to Larry Ellison, who is the CEO of Oracle, the one who runs the data centers. You know, Larry Ellison once offered Netanyahu a seat on the board of Oracle. Yeah. Yeah. That's right. They're buds. They're like that. He's gonna con he's a Zionist, magabillionaire. Right? Whatever. And he's going to censor everyone once he owns it. So we got two things for TikTok. Met we covered MetaX. Elon Musk, he banned his own chatbot, Grok, when it started telling people there was genocide in Gaza. He's disgusting, and, you know, obviously, he took the money from Israel to run propaganda ads. So that's just great. That covers about everything. Welcome to The United States Of Israel, guys. Welcome to The United States Of Israel. We haven't even touched we haven't even touched on what our government has done under Biden. They arrested 3,200 student activists and professors who protested the genocide peacefully on college campuses, calling on their schools to divest their massive endowment funds worth billions from all these complicit companies I'm telling you about right now. But the schools wouldn't do it. They wouldn't do the right thing and stand with humanity. And, you know, there's a lot you can talk about under Biden. He, conducted most of this genocide, oversaw the destruction of every single one of Gaza's hospitals, amongst other things, while lying about a ceasefire even though he never pressured Israel for a ceasefire once. Now Trump, you know, he ramps it up even more, and they're talking about taking away US citizens' passports if you criticize the state of Israel. They are deporting student activists like Mahmoud Khalil, who, you know, is pro Palestinian. He stands in solidarity with them. They're pulling funding from schools that allow allow anti Israel or pro Palestinian protests that are peaceful. They're pulling funding. Both parties were involved in passing that bill to ban TikTok, which has led us to where we are now with Larry Ellison. So, you know, we can we can blame both parties for that. Let's look at the parties a little more closely, though, and who funds them. APAC. APAC spent over 100,000,000. They're just one part of the massive prosely lobby. They spent 100,000,000 and elected into power a super majority of Zionists into congress. They supported a super majority of Zionists in 2024 and got them elected. Almost every single one except like two, I believe. That's why no one in government is gonna say no to giving Israel as many weapons as they ask for. That's why they're gonna do everything they want to to suppress criticism of Israel, do all these things that I just described, enable these companies to make a bag off the Palestinian genocide? Why do only 20 of our 435 congress members say it's genocide when half of American voters are saying it's genocide? And just look at the Democrat party, what is it? 77% of their base says it's genocide? 92% of their base wants to stop sending weapons to Israel? And yet they can't even they can't even criticize Israel. The party won't stop weapons to Israel. They won't even vote on that policy on their platform. This is a pretty good picture, like, the wide view of what is happening. You have all the billionaires aligned with Israel, whether they be Christian or Jewish Zionist. You have every single big tech company supporting Israel in some way, fueling the systems they are using to commit genocide, taking money for propaganda. You have all our media institutions doing the same thing and running cover for them. And you have all of our politicians as well. This isn't some conspiracy theory. This is real life. You have to admit that there might be there might be a problem when you have four and a half percent of congress saying genocide while 50 plus percent of American voters are saying it's genocide. What's going on? We've lost our sovereignty. It's not a joke. It's not hyperbole. We go to war against Iran on Israel's behalf. We change our laws prevent criticism of Israel. We're trying to ban boycotting Israel to throw American citizens in jail. The DOJ has been given the power to denaturalize anyone they see fit and explicitly those who are critical of the state of Israel. This is this is great. Trump also threatened to not do a deal with Canada because they're recognizing Palestine. We're sanctioning the international courts. We're threatening to pull out of the UN if they kick Israel out. Both of us on the left and right need to unite and rid Zionist influence out of America. This is insane. They don't care about what we think. They don't care about our interests or our human morals or the fact it's our tax dollars funding all of this. Every single one of these genocide profiteers must be held accountable. Our politicians, the companies, and the billionaires. You can support my work by clicking the link in my bio, which will let you subscribe to my Substack. Thank you and free Palestine.

Two speakers discuss U.S. policy on Israel, lobbying, and domestic politics. Speaker 0 says she’s pro-Israel and defender of Israel’s right to defend itself and of American Jews on campuses, but has no loyalty to any lobby group and has refused trips to Israel. She notes rising pressure to stay in a stance, saying, 'you're not allowed to' move off the lily pad. Speaker 1 explains APAC’s influence in Washington: 'APAC takes every single that they can, freshman, member of Congress, their first year... they take them on a very special trip to Israel' and that Israel receives '3.8 billion dollars in funding for Israel' annually, with an exception allowing purchases from Israeli defense contractors. He contrasts Israel’s economy with the U.S. debt and asks why Americans fund Israel. They emphasize America First, say 'any anti Israel people are welcome here,' and mention Judge McFadden's flag ruling about Israel.

The speaker states that the promise was to put America first, and believes there are still voices in the administration, such as J.D. Vance, Tulsi Gabbard, and RFK Junior, who could prevail. However, they were not persuasive in this case, but somebody was. The speaker claims that APAC, the Israeli lobby in congress, is very persuasive. The speaker observes that their colleagues' social media feeds all look the same, tweeting the same message about supporting Israel.

The conversation centers on claims that Israel and pro-Israel organizations have a major influence on the U.S. government and U.S. politics, including support for wars in the Middle East and outcomes affecting American servicemen and U.S. spending. Jeb Ball describes a viral moment at a Turning Point USA event in North Dakota where Glenn Beck filled in for Charlie Kirk (described as having died). Ball says he asked Beck a question about why the U.S. still supports Israel, citing allegations that Israel influences U.S. politics through APAC, involves the U.S. in Middle East wars, and is connected to the USS Liberty incident, which he says was not taught in school. He states Beck did not let him finish and instead shifted to talking about radical Islam. Casey Allen asks Ball what encouraged him to speak up and react that day. Ball says he was initially not planning to attend, bought a ticket about an hour before the event, and went after being encouraged by his father to regret not doing something rather than regretting doing nothing. Ball says his question was cut off quickly and that, in his view, freedom of speech exists only for topics people in power want to discuss, while Israel-related or “real issues” are shut down. Ball then discusses how young people around him are changing their views: he says friends who previously dismissed Israel-related claims as conspiracyists now ask questions and engage more, and he portrays the issue as not strictly left-right, but as becoming more widely questioned among younger people. The discussion expands to broader political and cultural grievances. Ball and Casey talk about immigration, tariffs, inflation, and what they describe as economic capture by large corporations and elites. On immigration, Ball says illegal immigrants should be removed and supports stopping immigration for at least ten years. He argues mass immigration harms workers, communities, and the American middle class, benefiting corporations. Casey adds a point about deportation causing work shortages, while citing an unemployment rate and claiming deportation would affect only a portion of the workforce; the conversation continues with both framing it as a question of priorities and labor impacts. They also discuss tariffs as restoring American manufacturing, deindustrialization, and currency effects from money printing. Ball references the end of the gold standard in 1971 and claims quantitative easing and expanded money supply benefit large corporations and billionaires at workers’ expense. They further discuss “technocracy” and what they portray as interlinked corporate and political power, with mentions of partnerships involving Trump and figures like Bill Gates and Zuckerberg. The conversation includes discussion of Elon Musk’s involvement in media and platforms, particularly his actions related to Twitter, and Ball describes Musk as “shady,” while also citing a view that platform access can allow discussion of topics previously restricted. Ball raises an extended theory that media “liberalization” and increased amplification of far-right figures could serve “social engineering” ends and ultimately justify harsher platform restrictions after a disruptive event. He also references alleged threats against pro-Israel influencers and says related actions occurred in Europe and Canada. He claims censorship and surveillance are increasing, and he connects this to a fear of false-flag events as well as the Israel conflict being portrayed as able to trigger major incidents. Casey asks about the “Sampson option,” which Ball says he has heard of, describing it as a plan where Israel would “flip a switch” and the U.S. would “go down with them” if the U.S. does not keep Israel alive. They frame this as a major national security threat they say is not seriously discussed. The conversation includes references to Operation Midnight Hammer and alleged U.S.-Iran bombing claims, which Ball says many people around him reacted to with support despite his belief that Trump campaigned against wars. Casey and Ball connect this to what they see as persistent U.S. intervention aligned with Israel’s interests, and they discuss Netanyahu’s visits and lobbying efforts as a driving influence. Ball and Casey then discuss Christian Zionism and evangelicals. Ball claims many evangelicals view support for Israel as a religious/spiritual obligation and that people who question it are treated as disloyal or demonic. They claim Christian Zionism did not originate in the Bible and instead was influenced by politicians. Ball describes social and generational differences in the South and in places like North Dakota, saying the concern is less among his younger peer group but more among older people. The conversation moves to U.S. elections and the GOP direction. Ball expresses hope that the Republican Party could shift and says he does not think J.D. Vance will be the nominee, suggesting possible alternatives like Steve Bannon or Rand Paul/Thomas Massie (with the transcript mentioning Massie repeatedly). Ball claims Israel-related politics and donor influence may drive candidates’ positions and that Massie’s stance resonates with voters in Kentucky. He says he expects pressure on candidates opposing what he describes as Zionist politics, including through wealthy donors. They discuss AI regulation, arguing that AI and automation should be regulated to protect workers and small businesses, and they claim federal efforts were included in Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” but removed due to unpopularity. Ball emphasizes that big tech and major corporations have major stakes in AI policy. A major portion of the transcript is devoted to Epstein-related claims and alleged connections between Epstein, Mossad, politicians, and Trump. Ball argues Epstein was an international agent, claims political blackmail, and says Epstein should be released and that the public should know what happened. They discuss allegations about funding relationships and mention people Ball associates with Epstein’s wealth sources. Ball also claims Tulsi Gabbard has access to Epstein-related files and that releasing them would be highly damaging, so they will not be released. The transcript later discusses the assassination attempts on Charlie Kirk and Trump, with Ball drawing parallels. Ball describes similarities: young alleged perpetrators without a public history, limited disclosed details, and a lack of transparency (including mentioning “no autopsy”). Ball claims reactions and subsequent political developments benefited Trump, and he asserts that Thomas Crooks acted with help from federal elements. Ball also claims he doubts details about public accounts of Crooks and mentions questions about missing or absent imagery and process. The conversation continues with Ball speculating about staging and operational capabilities. Toward the end, the discussion returns to censorship and social media bans. Ball says platforms may wait for a triggering event to justify crackdowns, and he advises caution in what people post while still encouraging people to speak. He also discusses alleged accounts and bans in right-wing influencer circles and claims that policies against “Holocaust denial” and “anti-Israel/anti-Zionism sentiment” were used to justify shutting down accounts. He emphasizes that even if platforms are restricted, he believes voices and ideas cannot be fully removed. The transcript closes with a broader theme of generational change, calls for younger people to speak out based on facts and rationality, and a hope that the next political cycles will reflect growing opposition to Israel lobby influence and establishment capture.

Good morning, Daniel. We’ve got a lot to cover today. A Ukrainian organization, Texty, funded by the US government, has published a list of Americans deemed enemies for opposing increased aid to Ukraine. This list includes many of our friends and colleagues, highlighting the troubling misuse of US funds. Furthermore, the US participated in an Israeli raid that killed over 270 Palestinians, raising serious questions about US authority and the proportionality of the response. Congress should demand answers about both these incidents. Thomas Massie’s claim that every Republican has an AIPAC “babysitter” influencing their votes reveals the extent of foreign lobbying. Public opinion is shifting against sending weapons to Israel, yet Congress remains unresponsive. Despite the bleak outlook, we remain hopeful and invite you to our Liberty Platform event on October 31st in Dulles, Virginia. We need to advocate for a non-interventionist foreign policy and bring our troops home.

Thomas Massie claims that Congress is influenced by foreign interests without registering as agents, raising concerns about election interference. This leads to the announcement of a film titled "Occupied," which has gained significant attention online. The discussion touches on the financial support to Israel, questioning where the money goes and who benefits. There are strong sentiments about the perceived control of the U.S. government by foreign interests, particularly regarding dual citizens. The conversation also addresses accusations of anti-Semitism when discussing these issues. A mention of Trump wearing a yarmulke is interpreted as a humiliation ritual, suggesting a loss of autonomy. The dialogue reflects deep frustrations about foreign influence and its implications for American sovereignty.

Israel's control over American politics is highlighted, with claims of buying Congress, the presidency, and the media. The speaker criticizes the American media for not condemning Israel's actions, accusing them of being owned by Israel. Benjamin Netanyahu is labeled as the world's most evil man, and Americans are urged to reflect on their country's actions. The speaker expresses disappointment in America's current state.

Afshin Ratansi hosts *Going Underground* from the UAE, saying that tomorrow Donald Trump will host Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, while Ratansi claims Gaza has been called out as genocide by the UK, U.S., and EU and that Saudi Arabia will not normalize relations with Israel. Ratansi connects this to the anniversary of John F. Kennedy’s assassination, referencing Charlie Hirsch’s *Samson Option* and claiming Kennedy tried to push Israel to open its Dimona nuclear weapons reactor for inspection while a separate clandestine apparatus, Operation Gladio, was already operating. Ratansi describes Gladio as NATO’s clandestine terrorism network run with the CIA and MI6, allegedly used to stage mass-murder atrocities blamed on the left to block legitimate parties in Cold War Europe and oppose Washington in the Global South, and claims Gladio “never truly ended.” Ratansi introduces Colonel Roxantana Watkins, a 30-year U.S. Air Force veteran who says she traced Cold War covert structures and believes they still shape the world. Watkins explains that Operation Gladio ran out of NATO and required NATO-aligned organizations to sign secret agreements to create stay-behind units in each country. She says the U.S. is a NATO country too and asks where its Gladio units were. She claims Gladio was used “everywhere,” including Iran before the overthrow of Mossadegh, Korea before the Korean War, and Vietnam “by the French.” Watkins says Gladio is a generic term and that actual programs had different names in each country—for example, Portugal’s “Jinter Press” and Turkey’s “Gray Wolves,” with Italy being the only country she says conducted an in-depth study that revealed the program existed under the name “Gladio.” Ratansi says Italy had the largest Communist Party in Europe after 1945 and that fake atrocities at railway stations discredited the left. Watkins agrees and says communism became a “boogeyman” attributed to the Soviet Union, while declassified CIA documents she cites discuss labor efforts assigned to the left. She says she stopped using “left and right” because it has no use in modern language, describing a model in which workers’ rights were abolished under Mussolini while labor organizing occurred alongside international corporations. She claims the National Cash Register took over transactions in Italy during Mussolini, and that James Jesus Angleton—father of CIA official James Angleton—was tied to the franchise owner, which she says enabled an intelligence network to control finances. Watkins says the system is orchestrated around “the international syndicate” of oligarchs controlling societies so they are not democratic. She links this to assassinations and overthrows when leaders become nationalistic and rely on resources to enrich their own people, citing Omar Gaddafi’s assassination and Venezuela’s situation. She then narrates the case of Patrice Lumumba in the early 1960s Congo, alleging Eisenhower and Nixon refused to meet him and that Belgium-linked arrangements would block Congo from enriching itself, leading Lumumba to refuse the deal and prompting his murder by “Operation Gladio Elements” controlled by Otto Skorzeny under Reinhard Gehlen’s German intelligence, the BND. Watkins argues that any prime minister or president “that stands up for their country” becomes a target. In response to whether Gladio aligned with Israeli interests, Watkins claims James Angleton sat at the Mossad desk in the CIA and at the Vatican’s desk, asserting that a “strategy of tension” governs Gladio, tracing it to the late 1800s with the Fabian Society and the idea of creating “left and right” camps to control people. She claims Israel is a strategy of tension concept controlling the Middle East, and says Taiwan was a pivotal friction point in Asia. Watkins says covert operations are funded with drug networks, citing Chiang Kai-shek in Taiwan as controlling over 80% of the opium trade in Asia, and describes Paul Helliwell’s alleged role in creating Castle Bank and using front companies for property purchases in Central Florida. She also claims the UK MI6 helped set up Colombia as part of the “crystal triangle” and that London set up Israel. Ratansi asks Watkins about Watkins’ reaction to the live-streamed assassination of Charlie Kirk. Watkins says Kirk’s persona encouraged people to talk to each other across divisions and that the apparatus “cannot have” that. She says the current Gladio rests on student youth movements worldwide and references “Optor in Serbia,” student movements, and George Soros funding, claiming college-age levels include recruiting foot soldiers for Mossad, MI6, and CIA. She compares it to FBI assassinating Fred Hampton after he built the “Rainbow Coalition,” saying authorities do not want people to come together. Ratansi raises poverty and opposition to Israel, including polls after Gaza and a SNAP pause during a government shutdown, and asks what happens if people rebel. Watkins responds that she argues the “42 million” figure is exaggerated and that the strategy includes cutting off funding so people rise up, using both conditions for radicals to evolve and “planned, targeted radicalizations.” She says during the shutdown she was surprised there was not a false flag to generate opposition, and claims Venezuela had multiple false-flag-style attempts in 2019 and 2020 that failed. Watkins says she tracked over 400 attempts to overthrow governments and documented 90 successful coups. Ratansi asks about the Jeffrey Epstein revelations and whether they would shock the public enough to overthrow oligarchic power. Watkins claims blackmail is “the grease” that makes operations work and says people like Jeffrey Epstein were part of enabling leverage, describing blackmail networks operating globally and citing examples involving underage videos and suicides after exposure. Ratansi asks whether Israeli power over the Trump administration is as strong as during the Biden administration. Watkins says Trump publicly called out Mary Madelson as funding various efforts and that Israel comes up frequently in Gladio research. She cites claims that the IDF created a one-year school for drug-network managers in Latin America and that Israel acted as a “cutout” for Reagan-era missile and weapons transfers, as well as involvement related to diamond mining in Africa despite Israel not owning diamond mines. She concludes that it is “very troubling” anytime Israeli support backs a politician, saying it implies significant pull over funding. Ratansi ends the show with condolences for people affected by what he calls ongoing UK-U.S. “armed genocide” across Palestine, and says the program will return on Saturday.

Israel's control over American politics is highlighted, with claims of buying Congress, the presidency, and the media. The speaker criticizes the American media for staying silent on Israel's actions, accusing them of allowing genocide. Benjamin Netanyahu is labeled as evil, with America being portrayed as sacrificing itself for Israel. The speaker expresses disappointment in America's current state and calls for reflection on its values.

The speaker believes 95-99% of Congress should be tried for treason for allowing Israel and its money to control everything in the United States. They claim the U.S. does not have control over itself because Congress is controlled by a foreign nation that does not have America's best interests in mind. The speaker cites a vote to cut $500 million from going to Israel, alleging it goes towards bombing kids, and claims 455 people voted to keep it, while only six voted against it. Marjorie Taylor Greene is praised for opposing the funding. The speaker asserts Israel controls the United States 100% and suggests people should investigate how much money each congressperson has taken from APAC, which they describe as an Israeli funding service. They also allege most members of Congress are probably on the Epstein list.

Speaker claims: "Israel has an overwhelming lobby over the United States government, and we have unconditionally supported them." He cites "BB Netanyahu came to our congress in the nineties, told us a list of countries that we need to take out. Some were Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, etcetera." He adds "Through those wars, we have lost trillions of dollars" and "We have lost American servicemen." He asserts "They don't teach about the USS Liberty, where Israel literally came, blew up an American ship because they want us to get in their war with, Egypt and they don't teach that in school." He asks "Why is there this societal taboo around criticisms of Israel? For example, APAC doesn't have to register as a foreign lobby, but like the Australia lobby does. And the it just That should be changed. I That should be corrected." Finally, "Look. I I am not gonna say Israel should have any special privileges. None."

Speaker 0 raises a question about accountability for Israel and mentions Jeffrey Epstein’s dealings with Mossad. Speaker 1 asks, without specifics, whether there are forces that tried to influence him to stop what he’s doing now. Speaker 0 responds that they wouldn’t vote for foreign aid and foreign war funding, and they were upset because he said no. He states: “I’m not voting to fund the Ukraine war ever,” and “Israel’s doing just fine. We don’t need to give them a penny, not a single penny, nor do we need to give it to any other country, but they get mad at me for that.”

The transcript centers on a retrospective beginning with a Casablanca exchange at the end of World War II, where Roosevelt told Churchill that the war wasn’t fought to reestablish British eighteenth-century methods, and Churchill asked what Roosevelt meant. Roosevelt answered with a definition of a system that takes more out of a country than it puts back in. Roosevelt died before the war ended, and the result, as described, was the triumph of British eighteenth-century methods or a system that takes more out than it puts in. The speaker then argues that since World War II, the United States has deteriorated: manufacturing employment fell from 31% of the population in 1950 to 8% today, and when including other goods-producing sectors (agriculture, mining, transportation), the share dropped from 55% to less than 20%. The speaker contends that good-paying jobs, industry, infrastructure, and family farms disappeared, and economic sovereignty was stripped by “British eighteenth-century methods of financialization and free trade,” leading to imports of food and “cheap crap” and an exploding trade deficit. The claim is made that Donald Trump is reversing this trend, with tariffs described as a powerful weapon that the global elites hate, and that they are working to rebuild the U.S. manufacturing base and economic independence. Support for this claim includes concrete numbers: in November, 136 new factories were started, along with 78 processing plants and 199 new warehouses. The narrative emphasizes that, beyond physical growth, there is a reawakening of a productive spirit among the population, especially the youth. An example is given from blue Massachusetts, where young people respond to opportunities in vocational training and productive jobs instead of pursuing liberal arts degrees with heavy debt. The speaker also highlights the Trump administration’s broader vision, including a merger between Trump’s Truth Social and TAE Technologies, described as signaling a revolutionary development: cheap, clean, limitless fusion power that could drive the economy forward and propel humanity into the solar system. The broader strategic claim is that, on the eve of 2026—the two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of American independence—there is an unprecedented opportunity. Trump is described as dismantling the postwar imperial system, ending perpetual wars, rebuilding American manufacturing, and treating nations as sovereign partners rather than pawns on a chessboard. However, the British establishment is portrayed as resisting this transformation, intending to turn back the clock by leveraging assets in Congress, the media, and intelligence agencies to create chaos and turn Trump supporters against one another. The speaker urges listeners not to fall for it and to keep their eye on the strategic picture.

The speakers discuss the potential for war between Iran and Israel, with one noting the US embassy in Iraq evacuated nonessential personnel and military bases were told to evacuate non-military personnel. One speaker expresses disappointment that Trump, who campaigned on preventing new wars, seems to be leading the US toward conflict. One speaker claims Trump could stop the conflict by telling Israel they are on their own, withholding intelligence and support. They lament American troops being in danger for no reason. The speakers criticize Trump for acting like Biden, merely expressing disapproval without taking action. They claim Congress is completely in Israel's pocket, despite public opinion, especially among younger Republicans, being unfavorable towards Israel. One speaker cites a post from Tom Cotton about Iran seeking nuclear weapons, likening it to the lead-up to the Iraq War.

The discussion centers on how politicization of intelligence has manifested in different eras, comparing past and present administrations. Speaker 0 asks whether the politicized weapons claims about Iraq and the CIA’s statements in the 1990s can be compared to today’s politicization of intelligence under John Ratcliffe and Tulsi Gabbard as head of DNI, arguing it is much worse now because of the mediocrity of those in control of key agencies. Speaker 1 counters by recalling the 1980s, noting that there was significant politicization of the Soviet threat to justify Reagan’s defense buildup, and adds that this is why he testified against Robert Gates in 1991. He asserts that politicization is bad, and insists that the current situation is worse than in the past. Speaker 1 explains: “It’s Because I look at the people who are ahead of these groups. Come on. Let’s be serious.” He targets the leadership of the director of national intelligence, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and the CIA, saying, “Have you ever seen a cabinet in The United States of such mediocrity, of such venality?” He emphasizes his background, stating, “I haven’t,” and that nothing compares to what is going on now, warning that “a lot of damage is being done to The United States and to the constitution of The United States and to the importance of separation of powers and the importance of rule of law and the importance of checks and balances. This is very serious stuff.” Speaker 0 attempts to steer toward historical figures like Robert Maxwell, but Speaker 1 dismisses that concern as off point, insisting he is making a point about Israel. The exchange then shifts to U.S. support for Israel, with Speaker 1 asserting that “Israel gets what it wants from The United States. It gets it from democratic presidents and from republican presidents.” He also criticizes Barack Obama for signing what he calls “that ten year $40,000,000,000 arms aid agreement,” arguing that Obama “never should have signed” it “because they treated Obama so shabbily in the first place.”

Speaker 0 contends that the world economy is severely damaged and worsening, blaming Israel’s influence, Trump’s policies, and BlackRock. They say Trump reversed the downturn but that his current behavior worsens the situation, describing him as a degenerate gambler who keeps betting with the people’s money. They warn that the global economy is being sunk by these decisions and that any recovery would be unlikely if he does not shut down the current course. Speaker 1 argues a simple plan: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and they won’t have one. They claim the president didn’t want to go that far, but there is no pressure from elsewhere. They assert victory will come, stating that militarily they have already achieved a complete victory in theory, with Iran’s navy effectively nullified and ships sunk by the U.S. They emphasize Iran’s strategy hinges on closing the Strait of Hormuz, not their blue-water navy. They note Iran has now made larger financial demands—a claim of $500,000,000,000 in reparations—describing these as part of a broader disaster. They accuse globalists and BlackRock of engineering the war to derail the Trump recovery, leading to inflation, fertilizer shortages, and a planetary downturn. They say there is no way to reverse this and warn that threats of further strikes against Iran could worsen the situation. They also accuse media and political figures of misrepresenting the war’s trajectory, and criticize those who supported the war for claiming to have been right. They suggest the debt situation is dire, with the national debt approaching or exceeding GDP in service, calling this a banana republic scenario. They describe a coming period of permanent austerity and a “great reset” via a central bank digital currency system, and contrast this with the supposed prior plan that could have rebuilt the economy. Speaker 2 adds that the United States holds all the cards if escalation occurs, but the goal is to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and restore open access without mines in the water or tolls. They emphasize the aim to return to the previous open state of the strait. Throughout, Speaker 0 revisits earlier warnings about the start of the war, insisting Schmoyle (Schmoy/ Schmoyle) had warned this would derail the global recovery. They recall personal discussions with Tucker Carlson about Trump’s assessment of the war’s consequences, noting that Trump claimed “everything I do always turns out okay,” even as the analyst contends the consequences have been severe. They reiterate that the “globalist trap” and the Iran war were designed to undermine the U.S. and world economy, with the goal of bringing about a prolonged austerity and a global cashless system. They describe demonstrably worsening indicators—stocks, oil, and rates rising; inflation accelerating; fertilizer shortages; and a deepening recession—arguing these dynamics confirm the planned malaise. They reference headlines about inflation, the Iran confrontation, and potential sleeper cells, and they criticize the left, Democrats, neocons, and “MAGA knob polishers” for supporting the war. They reiterate that the globalists’ objective is to derail the U.S. and Western economies and to push toward a controlled, austerity-driven global order, while claiming the administration’s responses are failing to reverse the trend.

- Trump is described as completely dependent on two pillars: the central banking system and the Fed for day-to-day provision to run the government. However, this group is claimed to be reporting to the Netanyahu syndicate, with Netanyahu and his syndicate asserted as in total control day to day. - The speaker asserts that Netanyahu, during the pandemic, was “killing more Israelis than Palestinians,” implying a harsh evaluation of Netanyahu’s actions. - The claimed dynamic is that Netanyahu wants Trump to engineer a war with Iran, and it appears that they are attempting to do so. The speaker cautions that they do not see a winning outcome, suggesting that if a real war is pursued without boots on the ground, there would be losses. - It is suggested that any such loss could make the neocons more powerful economically, implying a link between military action and economic plunder by neocons. - The speaker outlines strategic options: since the East-West strategy failed and Russia was not imploded, the alternative is to shift to a North-South approach by targeting Canada, Greenland, and Panama. This is presented as the next step for reshaping global strategy, given the failure of the East-West approach. - Trump is described as “educating the American people about what you need to keep the model going,” indicating a role in informing or guiding public understanding of the underlying framework or system. - The overall plan is characterized as a program to plunder their own populations and, by extension, plunder around the world, with a current focus on plundering the United States big time. The speaker asserts that this is the trajectory of the “syndicate.” - In sum, the transcript presents a narrative in which Trump relies on a Fed-centered financial system controlled by a Netanyahu-led syndicate, which allegedly drives aggressive geopolitical moves (notably toward Iran) and global plundering, with strategic shifts from East-West to North-South as part of an ongoing plan.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss being pro-Israel and defending Israel’s right to defend itself, while defending American Jews on campuses, and they insist they’re not defending any lobbyist group, including AIPAC. They describe being approached to visit Israel and declining due to family and work, noting growing pressure to stay aligned. They explain that APAC takes freshmen on trips to Israel and that Israel receives 3.8 billion dollars annually, with Israel able to buy from Israeli defense contractors. They contrast Israel’s debt (less than 400,000,000,000) with the US debt (37,000,000,000,000) and question why the US funds Israel. They cite Judge McFadden’s ruling about burning flags: 'burn any flag in The United States Of America, except you can't burn the Israeli flag in'. They advocate America first amid high costs of living, insurance, and housing. An ad for Birch Gold Group invites text m k to the number 989898.

Speaker 0 argues that the Israeli war for the greater Israel project is the catalyst for the collapse of American power worldwide due to unconditional U.S. support. He says the United States is on a road to an economic crisis, a financial catastrophe not experienced since the 1930s, and that until it becomes that bad, people will not voice their views in Washington. He contends that the Senate, the House, and the White House are all firmly in the grip of the lobby. He predicts that when the collapse comes, which he expects sometime this year, it will be “god awful hell to pay for the Israelis, and it’s going to be the end of this administration, and probably the end for most of the people on the hill.” He describes a movement from abundance—oil, cash, and everything—to scarcity, forecasting that the living standard won’t be enjoyed for long and that the country will resemble Great Britain after World War II: hopelessly in debt, retreating forces abroad to cut expenses, and unable to recover. He warns of a larger war and asks how long a blockade will last before others force it to end, whether it could become a global event, noting that the secretary of war has stated there will be a global blockade. He cites General Kane discussing boarding ships and blockading vessels coming out of the Persian Gulf and heading into the Strait of Malacca, calling the idea “stupidity on stilts” and predicting it will turn a current conflict into a global phenomenon and likely a global war. He insists there will be no good outcomes for the United States or its people, and that he does not blame Americans for their complacency, acknowledging that Americans are human beings and will only respond when hurt immediately or when they see clear pains such as shortages. Speaker 1 agrees, saying many people are not intentionally burying their heads in the sand, but they will awaken when they notice changes on grocery shelves, at the gas pump, inflation rising, housing prices falling, mortgage rates increasing, and all the pressures tied to lack of food on the table. He hopes for waking up beforehand but does not anticipate it. He then shares a recent, disturbing note from Natalie: Benjamin Netanyahu posted on social media about Lebanon, showing bombs hitting infrastructure across Lebanon.

Since 2021, Congress has voted on 22 resolutions for Israel, including denouncing antisemitism and supporting Israel. The congressperson stated they voted no on the last resolution and present on the one before that because they were getting sick of it. Republicans in Congress are always talking about Israel, and it feels like something has changed. Members of Congress constantly proclaim their faith and loyalty to Israel, stating that Israel is their greatest ally. The congressperson questions what about America and Americans, given the $37 trillion in debt and the struggles of younger generations to afford rent, housing, insurance, cars, and find good-paying jobs. They live paycheck to paycheck with stacked credit card bills and feel hopeless about realizing the American dream. Yet, in Congress, everyone is chasing and proclaiming their loyalty to a foreign country.