TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The recently released report by John Durham, after a 4-year investigation, reveals that the FBI hastily pursued allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, disregarding evidence that would have led them to drop the case. Durham suggests that confirmation bias played a significant role in the FBI's acceptance of uncorroborated information. He criticizes former FBI leaders James Comey and Andy McCabe for discounting information that didn't support the narrative of collusion. However, the report does not bring any additional charges against Comey or others as Trump had expected. It is important to note that President Biden allowed this investigation to continue along with another one involving Hunter Biden. Durham concludes that while no criminal allegations are made, the actions of the FBI and Justice Department fell short of professional standards.

The New York attorney general and Manhattan district attorney are teaming up to investigate the former president once he loses his immunity. They plan to sue him and challenge his legitimacy. They want to follow his money and bring him down. While the outcomes are uncertain, they have a good track record. The former president has insulted them, but they are determined to fight back and resist his influence. They believe he is crazy, losing control, and his days are numbered.

Breaking news from the Southern District of Florida (SD-FL): two junior assistant US attorneys have resigned after being asked to participate in a broad investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. A source familiar with internal concerns tells MSNBC that US Attorney Jason Redding Quinones called a division-wide meeting this afternoon to address the resignations and the investigation. The reporting notes that at least 30 subpoenas were sent out late Friday by SD-FL to individuals including former CIA chief John Brennan and former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. In addition to the resignations, it is reported that one of the junior ASAs who resigned felt unable to participate because doing so would violate their ethical responsibilities. The resignations are notable because it would be unusual for junior ASAs to be pulled into such a major investigation. Significantly, the subpoenas were signed by SD-FL’s number three, the executive assistant US attorney, rather than by a career prosecutor in leadership. This is presented as abnormal, with a comparison made to past instances where leadership signatures were absent from such actions, such as Lindsay Halligan signing indictments in the Northern District of Virginia due to a lack of available career prosecutors. The developments prompted SD-FL US Attorney Quinones to convene a unit-wide meeting of two to three dozen prosecutors in the major crimes division. The scope of the ongoing investigation remains unclear, but it is connected to the broader claim—involving Trump administration officials—that former Obama and Biden administration officials undertook to undermine the candidacies and presidencies of Donald Trump. The report also notes that President Trump has explicitly called for the jailing of Barack Obama and referenced other individuals in relation to the investigation. Subpoenas have been issued, and at least two SD-FL assistant US attorneys have resigned so far. In summary, two junior ASAs resigned after being asked to participate in a high-profile investigation tied to claims of Russian interference in 2016, with subpoenas issued to notable former officials, and the sign-off on those subpoenas coming from the office’s number-three official, prompting an internal meeting at SD-FL.

Inspector General Horwitz was questioned about the DOJ's review of the January 6th Capitol events, a review announced in 2021 but paused due to ongoing criminal cases. The review was restarted last year, and a draft report is under review. The report will include the number of confidential human sources operating on Capitol grounds on January 6th, but Horwitz declined to state the number, citing the draft status and classification review. The report is unlikely to be released before the upcoming election and its release may not occur before the next inauguration. The report will address whether confidential human sources followed DOJ protocols and include information about travel reimbursements. Horwitz stated he couldn't disclose details due to the draft status and classification concerns.

The DOJ is moving to end cases against Donald Trump before he takes office, citing a policy that prevents prosecuting sitting presidents. There was speculation that special counsel Jack Smith would push to complete the cases, but the DOJ believes there’s no chance for trial before Trump’s inauguration. Legal complexities and appeals make it unlikely these cases can proceed. Trump’s lawyers may have influenced this decision by requesting the cases be dropped. While there are ongoing appeals related to the classified documents case involving other defendants, Trump himself will not be part of these proceedings. This means he likely won't face accountability for serious federal charges, leaving unresolved questions about his potential guilt.

Over the past 3 years, Representative questioned FBI Director Wray and Attorney General Garland about federal assets at the Capitol on January 6th, but received no answers. The Inspector General announced a review of the DOJ response in 2021, paused it due to ongoing criminal cases, and reinitiated it last year. The report will include information on the number of confidential human sources operating on Capitol grounds on January 6th, but the exact number is not available yet due to the draft form and classification review. The report's release is not expected before the election, and possibly not before the next inauguration. The report will expose the presence of confidential human sources at the Capitol, and whether DOJ CHS protocols were followed. Representative inquired about the failed FBI investigation of the January 6th pipe bomb, citing lost information, deleted Secret Service texts, and corrupted cell phone data. The FBI allegedly lacks video footage of the DNC from January 6th. The Inspector General couldn't rule out the involvement of confidential human sources in the pipe bomb incident.

If Trump wins, DOJ won't stop ongoing cases. Cases in Florida and DC could continue until January if Trump is reelected. Garland would still lead DOJ for a while after inauguration. Trump is using the Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity to delay his sentencing in New York until September. Uncertain how things will unfold in the coming months.

This Friday is significant as it marks the day grand jury indictments may be announced. It’s preferable to avoid the Ides of March next week for such announcements. There are expectations for more indictments, particularly concerning criminal conspiracy involving U.S. persons and Russians. The investigation was ongoing during my tenure, focusing on potential collaboration between U.S. individuals and Russian entities. I anticipated that some individuals would face issues with the Department of Justice, and several have already been indicted or pled guilty. If any Trump family members are to be indicted, it would likely occur at the conclusion of Mueller's investigation, as such actions could jeopardize the special counsel's office's future.

The DOJ and FBI must report to congressional committees, with strong leadership from Republicans to enforce valid subpoenas. This requires a coordinated effort, similar to how Russiagate was addressed, involving multiple agencies like DOD, CIA, NSA, and others. The American public supported Donald Trump, and a collective approach is essential moving forward. Regarding Senate confirmations, the traditional process allows presidential candidates to present their cabinet as a package in early January. This has been done by previous presidents, including Joe Biden. The goal is to ensure Trump receives the same opportunity without creating unnecessary obstacles, emphasizing the need for uniform application of the Constitution in Washington, D.C., as the public desires.

The Department of Justice is facing significant concerns, particularly regarding its handling of Donald Trump. Many within the DOJ are apprehensive about his potential return to power, recalling the intense scrutiny and legal battles he faced during his presidency, especially related to the Russia investigation. There’s a perception that the Democrats, through internal conflicts, orchestrated a coup against Biden, leaving him surprised about his political future. The discussion highlights Trump's criticism of the DOJ's National Security Division, which he believes fabricated the Russia allegations. The narrative suggests that dismissing his grievances about the DOJ's actions is unreasonable.

A recent memo from the acting FBI director, Brian Driscoll, revealed a list of FBI agents involved in the January 6th investigation, ordered by the deputy attorney general. This situation is unprecedented, as incoming administrations typically do not exert political control over the FBI. The memo indicates a potential purge of experienced agents, including those overseeing national security and criminal investigations, many of whom have been linked to cases that Donald Trump opposed. Additionally, political operatives have been placed in the FBI director's office, raising concerns about their influence on ongoing decisions. The implications of these changes could significantly impact the FBI's operations and integrity.

Some Democratic members of Congress are preparing for the possibility of litigation. They're considering if they have the best teams possible to carry out their work. Some Republicans may say that Democrats are weaponizing the Justice Department, citing Trump's trial as an example. But in the United States, we are judged by a jury of our peers. Trump was found guilty in court on 34 felony charges. It's hard to make a partisan argument against that.

Why isn't FBI Director Chris Wray publicly defending his department's actions regarding the January 6th investigation? His resignation implies a lack of apolitical integrity within the FBI, suggesting that each presidential administration dictates priorities, rather than upholding a consistent, unbiased approach. This leaves the impression that wrongdoing occurred. The prioritization of the January 6th investigation over other crucial cases, like those involving child sex trafficking and serial killers, has negatively impacted agents' morale. However, some pushback exists; DC judges, including those appointed by both Republican and Democratic presidents, have openly criticized the Department of Justice's actions, refusing to allow these cases to be dismissed. Their outspokenness provides a counterpoint to the perceived silence from other quarters.

Donald Trump is facing multiple legal investigations, including criminal cases in Florida, Georgia, and related to the January 6th incident. There are also civil lawsuits, such as the defamation suit by E. Jean Carroll. The timeline is uncertain, but the goal is to conclude these trials before the next election. Joe Biden is not exempt from legal issues either, as Republicans have initiated a formal impeachment inquiry against him. They allege bribery and violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Hunter Biden, Joe Biden's son, is also facing legal troubles, including firearms and tax offenses. The outcome of these cases could potentially impact the Democratic race.

Questions have arisen regarding President Biden's handling of classified documents found in his garage, leading to an investigation by the Justice Department. Meanwhile, there have been ongoing efforts to target Trump, with the intention of preventing him from running for president again. However, it is important to note that Biden himself has not been indicted. The focus of the investigation seems to be on Trump, as Biden's DOJ has taken action against him. Stand with President Trump in opposition to Biden's actions.

After a 4-year investigation, the justice department released a 300-page report on the FBI's failures. Members of Congress will bring in John Durham to review the findings. The investigation confirms what we already knew from a previous inspector general report: the FBI did not uphold their duty to follow the law in certain events and activities related to the crossfire hurricane and intelligence operations.

We must remain focused on conducting our work properly, adhering to rules without letting partisan preferences influence our approach. In the investigations involving the president-elect, we strived to uphold these principles. Regarding the FBI's search for classified documents at Trump's home, we only resort to search warrants when all other avenues, like voluntary returns and subpoenas, have been exhausted and obstructed. There has been no interaction with the Biden White House concerning investigations into Trump. The FBI also investigated President Biden for classified documents and his son Hunter, who faced legal issues. This job often angers powerful individuals, but the rule of law dictates that investigations are driven by facts and legal standards, not political pressures.

The FBI allegedly maintains a list of over 5,000 employees involved in the January 6 investigation, though US Attorneys are reportedly not included. Some individuals are purportedly being treated poorly for performing their assigned duties related to the investigation. These duties involved investigating facts and applying them to legal standards as guided by prosecutors. This work is described as non-political.

The report has been released and it may not have fully satisfied some Republicans, but it does provide some level of exoneration for Donald Trump.

The Justice Department released a report revealing the FBI had 26 confidential human sources in DC on January 6th, with four entering the Capitol and 13 entering the restricted area. Questions arose regarding the discrepancy between this information and previous testimonies given under oath by FBI Director Ray. Concerns were raised about whether these sources instigated events, similar to the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot. The media is accused of downplaying the report's significance, while Republicans claim the events were an inside job. The report's implications for January 6th defendants are discussed, particularly regarding potential pardons and whether confidential human sources are exempt from prosecution. Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley questioned why the confidential human sources who entered the capital were not charged. Trump may pardon January 6th defendants. Tulsi Ganford may become the next DNI.

The uproar over the anti-Trump partisan Mueller operation suggests that the Garland Justice Department may be hiding something. Special prosecutor Jack Smith and his team are targeting Trump and other Republicans with unprecedented investigations. It is important for Smith to be held accountable and for transparency to be maintained. The American people deserve to know the truth.

Inspector General Horwitz was questioned about the DOJ's review of the January 6th Capitol events, a review announced in 2021 but paused due to ongoing criminal cases. The review was reinitiated last year, and a draft report is under review. The report will include the number of confidential human sources operating on Capitol grounds on January 6th, but Horwitz declined to state the number, citing the draft status and classification review. The report's release is hoped for in the next couple of months, but likely after the upcoming election. Horwitz confirmed the report will address whether confidential human sources followed DOJ protocols and include information about travel reimbursements. He stated he couldn't disclose details due to the draft status, pending responses from the DOJ and FBI, and classification concerns.

The Trump administration has executed a significant purge at the FBI, dismissing all six senior executives and multiple heads of field offices. This includes the leader of the Washington DC office, which was involved in prosecuting Trump, and several federal prosecutors linked to the January 6 investigations. These officials are career law enforcement professionals, not political appointees, and their removal could severely impact the FBI's ability to address terrorism and crime nationwide. Additionally, the acting deputy attorney general has requested a list of FBI employees involved in January 6 cases, affecting personnel across various field offices. This upheaval leaves local offices in disarray and raises concerns about the future of federal law enforcement.

It is unknown if lawsuits against Donald Trump will lead to impeachment. Trump has come close to criminality, and the greatest risk to him is Special Counsel Bob Mueller. The risk is that Trump obstructed justice by firing Comey with corrupt motives after Comey refused to drop the Flynn investigation. There is disagreement over whether Mueller can pursue criminal charges against Trump. The DOJ and president's lawyers historically take the position that a president cannot be criminally charged. It is an unsettled question that could end up in the Supreme Court. At a minimum, Mueller can charge Trump as an unindicted co-conspirator and seek permission from the grand jury to issue a report to Congress of the illegal conduct.

President Trump was almost jailed by his own Justice Department in his first term, due to figures like Jack Smith and Lisa Monaco. There should be a grand jury investigating the entire apparatus, as the problem is systemic, not just personnel-related. The FBI should be taken apart brick by brick, and its headquarters should be up for sale. The FBI's culture rewards corruption and cowardice in ethics and morality. The FBI has the best PR operation in Washington, D.C., making them untouchable, with no one in Congress willing to defang or cut their funding. Members of Congress are intimidated.